請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96746完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 姚開屏 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Kai-ping Yao | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 冷芷涵 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Chih-Han Leng | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-21T16:22:03Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-03-08 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-02-21 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-12-12 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Abdul-Quader, A. S., Heckathorn, D. D., Sabin, K., & Saidel, T. (2006). Implementation and analysis of respondent driven sampling: Lessons learned from the field. Journal of Urban Health, 83(7 SUPPL.).
Arabie, P., Boorman, S. A., & Levitt, P. R. (1978). Constructing block models: How and why. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 17(1). Baggio, R. (2019). Weighted networks: the issue of dichotomization. International Journal of Tourism Sciences, 19(1). Baghaei, P., & Aryadoust, V. (2015). Modeling Local Item Dependence Due to Common Test Format With a Multidimensional Rasch Model. International Journal of Testing, 15(1). Batterton, K. A., & Hale, K. N. (2017). The Likert Scale What It Is and How To Use It. Phalanx, 50(2). Best, J. I., & Blakeslee, J. E. (2020). Perspectives of youth aging out of foster care on relationship strength and closeness in their support networks. Children and Youth Services Review, 108, 104626. Boccaletti, S., Latora, V., Moreno, Y., Chavez, M., & Hwang, D. U. (2006). Complex networks: Structure and dynamics (Vol. 424) (No. 4-5). Böckenholt, U. (2014). Modeling motivated misreports to sensitive survey questions. Psychometrika, 79, 515–537. Breiger, R. L., Boorman, S. A., & Arabie, P. (1975). An algorithm for clustering relational data with applications to social network analysis and comparison with multidimensional scaling. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 12(3). Brooks, S. P., & Gelman, A. (1998). General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7(4), 434–455. Cho, S. J., & Cohen, A. S. (2010). A multilevel mixture IRT model with an application to DIF. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35(3). Cohen, A. S., & Bolt, D. M. (2005). A mixture model analysis of differential item functioning (Vol. 42) (No. 2). Cook, L. L., & Eignor, D. R. (1991). IRT Equating Methods. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(3). Costa, L. D. F., Rodrigues, F. A., Travieso, G., & Boas, P. R. (2007). Characterization of complex networks: A survey of measurements (Vol. 56) (No. 1). Dekker, M. M., Blanken, T. F., Dablander, F., Ou, J., Borsboom, D., & Panja, D. (2022). Quantifying agent impacts on contact sequences in social interactions. Scientific Reports, 12(1). De Lange, D., Agneessens, F., & Waege, H. (2004). Asking Social Network Questions: A Quality Assessment of Different Measures. Metodološki zvezki, 1(2). de Sola Pool, I., & Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The Acquaintance Process. American Sociological Review, 26(6). Doreian, P., Kapuscinski, R., Krackhardt, D., & Szczypula, J. (1996). A brief history of balance through time. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 21(1-2). Fang, R., Landis, B., Zhang, Z., Anderson, M. H., Shaw, J. D., & Kilduff, M. (2015). Integrating personality and social networks: A meta-analysis of personality, network position, and work outcomes in organizations. Organization Science, 26(4), 1243–1260. Ferligoj, A., & Hlebec, V. (1999). Evaluation of social network measurement instruments. Social Networks, 21(2), 111–130. Frank, O., & Strauss, D. (1986). Markov graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(395), 832–842. Freeman, L. C. (1984). The impact of computer based communication on the social structure of an emerging scientific specialty. Social Networks, 6(3), 201–221. Freeman, L. C., & Freeman, S. C. (1980). A Semi-Visible College: Structural Effects of Seven Months of EIES Participation by a Social Networks Community. Eletronic Communication: Technology and Impacts, 77–85. Freeman, S. C., & Freeman, L. C. (1979). The networkers network: A study of the impact ofa new communications medium on sociometric structure. School of Social Sciences University of Calif. Garlaschelli, D., & Loffredo, M. I. (2004). Patterns of link reciprocity in directed networks. Physical Review Letters, 93(26 I). Glas, C. A.W., & Meijer, R. R. (2003). A Bayesian approach to person fit analysis in item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27(3), 217–233. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26–42. Golinelli, D., Ryan, G., Green, H. D., Kennedy, D. P., Tucker, J. S., & Wenzel, S. L. (2010). Sampling to reduce respondent burden in personal network studies and its effect on estimates of structural measures. Field Methods, 22(3). Gormley, I. C., & Murphy, T. B. (2007). A latent space model for rank data. In Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics) (Vol. 4503 LNCS). Gruenfeld, D. H., Mannix, E. A., Williams, K. Y., & Neale, M. A. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 1–15. Han, W. J., Huang, C. C., & Garfinkel, I. (2003). The importance of family structure and family income on family’s educational expenditure and children’s college attendance: Empirical evidence from Taiwan (Vol. 24) (No. 6). Hlebec, V., & Ferligoj, A. (2002). Reliability of social network measurement instruments. Field Methods, 14(3), 288–306. Hoff, P. D. (2005). Bilinear mixed-effects models for dyadic data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100(469), 286–295. Hoff, P. D., Raftery, A. E., & Handcock, M. S. (2002). Latent space approaches to social network analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(460), 1090–1098. Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1971). Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Small Group Research, 2(2). Huang, H. Y. (2016). Mixture random-effect IRT models for controlling extreme response style on rating scales (Vol. 7) (No. NOV). Huang, H. Y., Wang, W. C., Chen, P. H., & Su, C. M. (2013). Higher-Order Item Response Models for Hierarchical Latent Traits. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(8). Iacobello, G., Ridolfi, L., & Scarsoglio, S. (2021). A review on turbulent and vortical flow analyses via complex networks (Vol. 563). Ishwaran, H., & Rao, J. S. (2005). Spike and slab variable selection: Frequentist and bayesian strategies (Vol. 33) (No. 2). Jeon, M., Jin, I. H., Schweinberger, M., & Baugh, S. (2021). Mapping Unobserved Item Respondent Interactions: A Latent Space Item Response Model with Interaction Map. Psychometrika, 86(2). Jin, I. H., & Jeon, M. (2019). A Doubly Latent Space Joint Model for Local Item and Person Dependence in the Analysis of Item Response Data. Psychometrika, 84(1). Jin, K. Y., &Wang, W. C. (2014). Generalized IRT Models for Extreme Response Style. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74(1). Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4). Kang, I., Jeon, M., & Partchev, I. (2023). A Latent Space Diffusion Item Response Theory Model to Explore Conditional Dependence between Responses and Response Times. Psychometrika, 88(3). Krackhardt, D., & Handcock, M. S. (2007). Heider vs simmel: Emergent features in dynamic structures. In Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics) (Vol. 4503). Krivitsky, P. N. (2012). Exponential-family random graph models for valued networks. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 6. Krivitsky, P. N., & Butts, C. T. (2017, 8). Exponential-family Random Graph Models for Rank-order Relational Data. Sociological Methodology, 47(1), 68–112. Krivitsky, P. N., Handcock, M. S., Raftery, A. E., & Hoff, P. D. (2009). Representing degree distributions, clustering, and homophily in social networks with latent cluster random effects models. Social Networks, 31(3), 204–213. Leng, C.-H., Huang, H.-Y., & Yao, G. (2020). A social desirability item response theory model: Retrieve–deceive–transfer. Psychometrika, 85, 56–74. Lewandowski, D., Kurowicka, D., & Joe, H. (2009). Generating random correlation matrices based on vines and extended onion method. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 100(9). Li, R.-H., & Chen, Y.-C. (2016). The Development of a Shortened Version of IPIP Big Five Personality Scale and the Testing of Its Measurement Invariance between Middle-Aged and Older People. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 12(4), 87–119. Li, Y., Bolt, D. M., & Fu, J. (2006). A comparison of alternative models for testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30(1). Liu, Y. C., McNeil, S., Hackl, J., & Adey, B. T. (2022). Prioritizing transportation network recovery using a resilience measure. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 7(1). Luo, J., De Carolis, L., Zeng, B., & Jeon, M. (2023). Bayesian Estimation of Latent Space Item Response Models with JAGS, Stan, and NIMBLE in R. Psych, 5(2). Luo, T., Cao, Z., Wang, Y., Zeng, D., & Zhang, Q. (2022). Role of Asymptomatic COVID-19 Cases in Viral Transmission: Findings From a Hierarchical Community Contact Network Model. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 19(2). Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). bayestestR: Describing Effects and their Uncertainty, Existence and Significance within the Bayesian Framework. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(40). McAssey, M. P., & Bijma, F. (2015). A clustering coefficient for complete weighted networks. Network Science, 3(2). McCarty, C., Killworth, P. D., & Rennell, J. (2007). Impact of methods for reducing respondent burden on personal network structural measures. Social Networks, 29(2). Mitchell, T. J., &Beauchamp, J. J. (1988). Bayesian variable selection in linear regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404). Moody, J., McFarland, D., & Bender-DeMoll, S. (2005). Dynamic network visualization (Vol. 110) (No. 4). MW, der Linden, W. J. V., & Hambleton, R. K. (1997). Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92(439). Najafi, H., & Saghaei, A. (2021). Statistical monitoring for change detection of interactions between nodes in networks: With a case study in financial interactions network. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 50(20). Pattison, P., & Wasserman, S. (1999). Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: II. Multivariate relations. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 52(2), 169–193. Peng, S., Roth, A. R., & Perry, B. L. (2023). Random sampling of alters from networks: A promising direction in egocentric network research. Social Networks, 72. Plackett, R. L. (1975). The analysis of permutations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 24(2), 193–202. Robins, G., Pattison, P., Kalish, Y., & Lusher, D. (2007). An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29(2), 173–191. Robins, G., Pattison, P., & Wasserman, S. (1999). Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: III. Valued relations. Psychometrika, 64(3), 371–394. Runge, J. M., Lang, J. W., Chasiotis, A., & Hofer, J. (2019). Improving the Assessment of Implicit Motives Using IRT: Cultural Differences and Differential Item Functioning. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(4). Sampson, S. F. (1968). A Novitiate in a Period ofChange: A n Experimental and Case Study of Social Relationships (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Sewell, D. K., & Chen, Y. (2015). Analysis of the formation of the structure of social networks by using latent space models for ranked dynamic networks. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C: Applied Statistics, 64(4). Shortreed, S., Handcock, M. S., & Hoff, P. (2006). Positional estimation within a latent space model for networks. In Methodology (Vol. 2). Sijtsma, K., &Verweij, A. C. (1999). Knowledge ofsolution strategies and IRT modeling of items for transitive reasoning. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23(1). Snijders, T. A. B., Pattison, P. E., Robins, G. L., & Handcock, M. S. (2006). New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological Methodology, 36(1), 99–153. Squartini, T., Picciolo, F., Ruzzenenti, F., & Garlaschelli, D. (2013). Reciprocity of weighted networks. Scientific reports, 3(1), 2729. Stan Development Team. (2020). Stan Modeling Language User’s Guide and Reference Manual, Version 2.19.2. Interaction Flow Modeling Language. Turek, D., de Valpine, P., & Paciorek, C. J. (2024). nimbleHMC: An R package for Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling in nimble. Journal ofOpen Source Software, 9(99), 6745. Wasserman, S. (1980). Analyzing social networks as stochastic processes. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75(370). Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications Stanley Wasserman, Katherine Faust - Google Books. Applied Network Science. Wasserman, S., & Pattison, P. (1996). Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs and p. Psychometrika, 61(3), 401–425. Wentzel, K. R., Jablansky, S., & Scalise, N. R. (2018). Do Friendships Afford Academic Benefits? A Meta-analytic Study. Educational Psychology Review, 30(4). Wu, S.-C. (2017, 6). The Development of the Revised Learning and Study Strategies Inventory: High School Version. Psychological Testing, 64(2), 155–181. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96746 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究發展了一種用於分析對兩兩關係進行評級（rating relational data）的試題反應模型（item response theory model）。本研究假設此種資料是發送者（sender）使用小的量尺數目對與接受者的關係（receiver）進行評級。因此，我們將此網路資料定義為是由發送者和接收者建構的有向網路（directed networks）。該模型是基於評等量尺模型（rating scale model）並結合潛在空間模型（latent space model）構建的。本研究所提出之模型，將發送者和接收者投射在一維的潛在量尺上討論兩兩間的互惠關係（reciprocity），並同時在低維度量空間上比較個體間的同質性（homophily）。該模型是在貝氏框架（Bayesian framework）下建立的，並使用馬可夫鏈蒙特卡羅方法（Markov chain Monte Carlo methods）來逼近全條件後驗分佈（full conditional posterior distributions）。模擬研究顯示模型參數得到了滿意的估計。該模型的有效性已透過實徵研究得到證明，並且還表現出令人滿意的恢復完整網路（complete networks）的能力。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study developed a new item response theory model for rating relational data. The relational data is assumed to be rated using a rating scale with a small ordinal number. Thus, the network data is supposed to be directed networks constructed by senders and receivers. The model is built based on the rating scale model and incorporated with a latent space model. In the proposed model, senders and receivers are supposed to be compared on a one-dimensional scale for dyadic relationships and be compared on a low-dimensional metric space for homophily. The model is built under a Bayesian framework, and Markov chain Monte Carlo methods are used to approximate the full conditional posterior distributions. The simulation study demonstrates that the model parameters are satisfactorily recovered. The model's applicability has been proven by implementing it with empirical data, and it also exhibits a satisfactory ability to recover completed networks. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-02-21T16:22:03Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-02-21T16:22:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgements i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 1 Introduction P1 1.1 Literature Review P2 1.2 The Current Research P4 2 Model P6 3 Estimation Procedure P10 4 Simulation Study P12 4.1 Testing the Recovery Ability for Model Parameters P13 4.2 Testing the Recovery Ability for Reciprocity Index P18 4.3 Testing the Recovery Ability for Clustering Index P20 5 Empirical Study P23 5.1 Participants P23 5.2 Instruments P24 5.3 Descriptive Analysis P25 5.4 Model Analysis P27 5.5 Model’s Recovery Ability P34 6 Discussion and Conclusion P38 7 References P41 A Appendix P49 A.1 Model Estimation in NIMBLE P49 A.2 A Preliminary Study: Correlation between ρ and r(Y) P55 A.3 A Preliminary Study: Correlation between λ and c(Y) P56 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 社會網絡 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 試題反應理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 評等量尺模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 潛在空間模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 評等關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | rating relational data | en |
| dc.subject | social networks | en |
| dc.subject | latent space model | en |
| dc.subject | item response theory (IRT) | en |
| dc.subject | rating scale model (RSM) | en |
| dc.title | 擴展試題反應模型於分析評等量尺關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | An Item Response Model for Rating Relational Data | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 李宣緯 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | Hsuan-Wei Lee | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉振維;謝志昇;張硯評;江彥生 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chen-Wei Liu;Chih-Sheng Hsieh;Yen-Ping Chang;Yen-Sheng Chiang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 試題反應理論,評等量尺模型,評等關係,社會網絡,潛在空間模型, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | item response theory (IRT),rating scale model (RSM),rating relational data,social networks,latent space model, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 56 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202404665 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-12-12 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2029-12-12 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 此日期後於網路公開 2029-12-12 | 1.58 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。