Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 財務金融學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96623
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳業寧zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorYeh-Ning Chenen
dc.contributor.author周茵茵zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorYin-Yin Chouen
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-20T16:15:08Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-21-
dc.date.copyright2025-02-20-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2025-01-20-
dc.identifier.citationAgrawal, A., Jaffe, J. F. & Karpoff, J. M. (1999). Management Turnover and Governance Changes Following the Revelation of Fraud. The Journal of Law & Economics, 42, 309–342.
Alton, R. G. & Mark, D. V. (2001). Do Depositors Care About Enforcement Actions? Journal of Economics and Business, 53, 283-311.
Arnold, M. & Engelen, P. J. (2007). Do Financial Markets Discipline Firms for Illegal Corporate Behaviour? Management & Marketing, 2, 12.
Baucus, M. S. & Baucus, D. A. (1997). Paying the Piper: An Empirical Examination of Longer-Term Financial Consequences of Illegal Corporate Behavior. The Academy of Management Journal, 40, 129–151.
Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217.
Bhagat, S., Brickley, J. A. & Coles, J. L. (1994). The Costs of Inefficient Bargaining and Financial Distress. Journal of Financial Economics, 35, 221–247.
Chava, S., Agnes Cheng, C. S., Huang, H. & Lobo, G. J. (2010). Implications of Securities Class Actions for Cost of Equity Capital. International Journal of Law and Management, 52, 144–161.
Davidson, W. N., Worrell, D. L. & Lee, C. I. (1994). Stock Market Reactions to Announced Corporate Illegalities. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 979–987.
Dietrich, A. & Wanzenried, G. (2014). The Determinants of Commercial Banking Profitability in Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Countries. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 54, 337–354.
Fich, E. M. & Shivdasani, A. (2007). Financial Fraud, Director Reputation, and Shareholder Wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 86, 306–336.
Griffin, P. A., Grundfest, J. A. & Perino, M. A. (2004). Stock Price Response to News of Securities Fraud Litigation: An Analysis of Sequential and Conditional Information. Abacus 40, 21–48.
Haslem, B. (2005). Managerial Opportunism During Corporate Litigation. The Journal of Finance, 60, 2013–2041.
Hogsett, R. M. & Radig, W. J. (1994). Employee Crime: The Cost and Some Control Measures. Review of Business, 16, 9–14.
K ̈oster, H. & Pelster, M. (2017). Financial Penalties and Bank Performance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 79, 57–73.
Karpoff, J. M., Lee, D. S. & Martin, G. S. (2008). The Cost to Firms of Cooking the Books. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43, 581–611.
Koku, P. S. & Qureshi, A. A. (2006). Analysis of the Effects of Settlement of Interfirm Lawsuits. Managerial and Decision Economics, 27, 307–318.
Manthos D. D., Panagiotis K. S. & Chris T. (2019). Supervisory Enforcement Actions and Bank Deposits. Journal of Banking & Finance, 106, 110-123.
Murphy, D. L., Shrieves, R. E. & Tibbs, S. L. (2009). Understanding the Penalties Associated with Corporate Misconduct: An Empirical Examination of Earnings and Risk. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44, 55–83.
Pereira, J., Malafronte, I., Sorwar, G & Nurullah, M. (2019). Enforcement Actions, Market Movement and Depositors’ Reaction: Evidence from the US Banking System. Journal of Financial Services Research, 55, 143–165.
Schnatterly, K. (2003). Increasing Firm Value Through Detection and Prevention of White-Collar Crime. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 587-614.
Song, C. & Han, S. H. (2017). Stock Market Reaction to Corporate Crime: Evidence from South Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 143, 323–351.
Tibbs, S. L., Harrell, D. L. & Shrieves, R. E. (2011). Do Shareholders Benefit from Corporate Misconduct? A Long-Run Analysis. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8, 449-476.
Zeidan, M. J. (2013). Effects of Illegal Behavior on the Financial Performance of US Banking Institutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 313–324.
余紀瑩(2019),金管會裁罰案件對金控公司股票報酬率的影響,碩士學位論文。
林欣儀(2021),金管會裁罰案件對銀行業股票報酬率之影響,碩士學位論文。
連郁涵(2022),重大裁罰案件對上市金融業股價報酬及財務績效之影響,碩士學位論文。
蔣佩君(2023),金管會裁罰銀行業行員舞弊案件後對公司股價之研究,碩士學位論文。
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96623-
dc.description.abstract本研究以1993年至2022年底臺灣銀行為樣本,探討金管會裁罰對銀行業務表現及市場反應的影響。研究結果顯示,無論罰款的金額、次數或嚴重程度,受罰銀行當月的稅前淨利率和存款變動率皆呈現下降趨勢,惟未達經濟顯著性。但觀察期拉長至三年,裁罰次數與稅前淨利率及存款變動率呈現顯著負相關,顯示裁罰對銀行的長期影響為負面,符合理論預期。此外,罰款原因與銀行業務表現無顯著關聯,但當罰款金額較高或罰則較嚴重時,多類裁罰原因將對稅前淨利率有負顯著加乘效果。

市場反應分析顯示,裁罰公告後會出現正累積平均異常報酬,尤其在處罰較輕的情況下,說明罰款公告消除不確定性且懲罰低於預期,市場反應正面,為Köster和Pelster (2017) 的結論提供實證支持。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study analyzes the impact of penalties imposed by Taiwan's Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) on banks' operational performance and market reactions, using data from Taiwanese banks between 1993 and 2022. The empirical result shows that penalized banks tend to experience a decline in both pre-tax profitability and deposits in the month the penalty is imposed. However, these immediate effects are not economically significant. Over a longer observation period of three years, the number of penalties is significantly negatively correlated with changes in pre-tax profitability and deposit levels, suggesting a long-term negative impact, which is consistent with theoretical expectations.

In terms of market reactions, the analysis reveals a positive cumulative abnormal return following penalty announcements, especially in cases of lighter penalties. This suggests that the announcement reduces uncertainty, and the penalties may be less severe than anticipated, leading to a positive market response. These findings provide empirical support for the conclusions of Köster and Pelster (2017).
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-02-20T16:15:08Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2025-02-20T16:15:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員審定書 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
第壹章 緒論 1
第貳章 文獻回顧 3
第一節 裁罰對其業務表現影響 3
第二節 裁罰對股價影響 4
第三節 本研究貢獻 6
第參章 研究設計 8
第一節 研究假說 8
第二節 研究方法 10
第三節 樣本選取與實證資料來源 16
第肆章 實證結果與分析 17
第一節 裁罰對業務表現影響分析 17
第二節 裁罰對股價影響分析 39
第三節 穩健性測試 47
第伍章 結論 53
參考文獻 55
附錄 58
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject獲利zh_TW
dc.subject累積平均異常報酬率zh_TW
dc.subject銀行業務表現zh_TW
dc.subject裁罰案件zh_TW
dc.subject金管會zh_TW
dc.subjectCumulative abnormal returnen
dc.subjectFinancial Supervisory Commission (FSC)en
dc.subjectPenaltyen
dc.subjectBank performanceen
dc.subjectProfitabilityen
dc.title金管會裁罰案件對銀行業務與股價表現的影響zh_TW
dc.titleThe Impacts of Regulatory Penalties on Bank Performanceen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear113-1-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee林軒馳;陳韋達zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeHsuan-Chih Lin;Wei-Da Chenen
dc.subject.keyword金管會,裁罰案件,銀行業務表現,獲利,累積平均異常報酬率,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordFinancial Supervisory Commission (FSC),Penalty,Bank performance,Profitability,Cumulative abnormal return,en
dc.relation.page78-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202500166-
dc.rights.note未授權-
dc.date.accepted2025-01-20-
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept財務金融學系-
dc.date.embargo-liftN/A-
顯示於系所單位:財務金融學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-113-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
3.33 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved