請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96592完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 謝明慧 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Ming-Huei Hsieh | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林志芬 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Chih-Fen Lin | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-19T16:40:29Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-20 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-02-19 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-11-25 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部分
[1] 王長根與張麗萍,“中小企業品牌創新管理研究”,經濟科學出版社,(2014) [2] 王萍,“中小企業創新驅動與品牌建設”,復旦大學出版社,(2015) [3] 張健與李梅“,多品牌策略的企業發展路徑”,清華大學出版社,(2018) [4] 黃德昌與王俊傑,“策略創業:企業成長的新途徑”,中國經濟出版社,(2009)。 [5] 劉力與張莉,“品牌管理與策略擴張”,北京大學出版社,(2012)。 二、英文部分 [1] Aaker, D. A., “Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name”, New York: The Free Press, (1991). [2] Aaker, D. A., “Building Strong Brands”, Free Press, (1996). [3] Abimbola, T., & Vallaster, C., “Brand, organizational identity and reputation in SMEs: An overview”, Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 10(4), 341- 348, (2007). [4] Barney, J.,“Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120, (1991) [5] Berthon, P., Ewing, M. T., & Napoli, J., “Brand management in small to medium- sized enterprises”, Journal of Small Business Management, 46(1), 27-45, (2008). [6] Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M., “The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1-34, (1997). [7] Burgelman, R. A., “A Model of the Interaction of Strategic Behavior, Corporate Context, and the Concept of Strategy”, Academy of Management Review, 8(1), 61-70, (1983). [8] Covin, J. G., & Miles, M. P.,“Corporate Entrepreneurship and the Pursuit of Competitive Advantage”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 47-63, (1999). [9] Drucker, P. F., “Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles”, Harper & Row, (1985). [10] Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H., “The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage”, Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679, (1998). [11] Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A., “Dynamic capabilities: What are they? ”, Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121, (2000). [12] Gulati, R., “Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation”, Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397-420, (1999). [13] Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D.,Sirmon, D. G. & Trahms, C. A., “Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating Valuefor Individuals, Organizations, and Society”, Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(2), 57-75, (2011). [14] Hollensen, S., “Marketing Management: A Relationship Approach (3rd ed.)”, Pearson, (2015). [15] Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A. & Sirmon, D. G., “A Model of Strategic Entrepreneurship: The Construct and its Dimensions”, Journal of Management, 29(6), 963-989, (2003). [16] Kapferer, J. N., “The New Strategic Brand Management: Advanced Insights and Strategic Thinking”, Kogan Page, (2012). [17] Keller, K. L., “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity”, Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22, (1993). [18] Keller, K. L., “Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity”, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, (2003). [19] Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R., “Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant”, Harvard Business Review Press, (2005). [20] Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G., “Principles of Marketing (17th ed.)”, Pearson, (2017). [21] Krake, F. B. G. J. M., “Successful Brand Management in SMEs: A New Theory and Practical Hints”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 14(4), 228-238, (2005). [22] O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L., “Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206, (2008). [23] Rindova, V. P., & Kotha, S., “Continuous "morphing": Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function”, Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1263-1280, (2001). [24] Teece, D. J., “Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350, (2007). [25] Teece, D.J., Pisano,G.,&Shuen,A., “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533, (1997). [26] Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K.,“Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda”, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31-51, (2007). [27] Wernerfelt, B., “A resource-based view of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180, (1984). [28] Wong, H. Y., & Merrilees, B., “A brand orientation typology for SMEs: A case research approach”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 14(3), 155-162, (2005). [29] Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G., “Contextual Influences on the Corporate Entrepreneurship-Performance Relationship: A Longitudinal Analysis”, Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43-58, (1995). 三、網路部分 [1] Harvard Business Review, “Branding in the Digital Age”. [2] Small Business Administration (SBA), “Branding for Small Businesses”. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96592 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 中小企業為臺灣經濟發展的支柱,依照臺灣經濟主管部門中小及新創企業署發佈的《2023年中小企業白皮書》所調查,2022年臺灣中小企業家數超過163萬家,占全體企業達98%以上;就業人數為913萬,占台灣就業人數5成;銷售額超過28兆元,占比超過5成,出口額達到3.6兆元,年增率超過7%。惟中小企業在成立品牌以擺脫OEM模式競價困境和創造永續發展的過程中,經常遭遇以下兩大困境,因而無法提升企業競爭力:
一、資源(金)有限:中小企業在投資產品或技術時,必須透過有效的資源整合和策略分析用時間換取成長空間;而掌握豐富資源的大型企業,卻在資源調度上具有更高的風險承受力,更多元彈性的掌控投資時機點,先占利基市場。 二、人力有限:中小企業在人力的招募和留才上,多在員工情緒價值層面的投資才能與大型企業拉開差異,惟大型企業擅用的薪資待遇優勢,仍是當今臺灣勞動市場吸引人才應聘的主因,也因此大型企業壟斷優秀人力將不利於中小企業的生存。中小企業最快也最難維持的成長途徑就是成立品牌,好的品牌策略不僅可以加速大型集團與企業的成長,更能協助中小型企業快速深化國際影響力,透過品牌的行銷和營運,一次的異業合作便有機會使品牌拓展到國際視野,逐漸累積品牌力來 加速資日後營運資本。 本研究分析LS團如何透過內部跨品牌合作相繼發展臺灣品牌ZUNI、ENL和Zsel,並透過掌握市場需求由主流到個性化,再到個體化,讓品牌間透過傳承技術和資源,接力為下個品牌產出鋪墊,搭配傳統工藝的匠人精神,返璞歸真創作出有情緒價值的商品,使LS集團與消費者共創的商品願景成為企業成長的驅動力。 本研究雖整理並分析出LS集團旗下品牌ZUNI成功接力傳產鞋材的經驗和ENL在策略發展上相較ZUNI轉型的不足和修正建議,惟在成為中小企業可以複製的範本應用上,尚須要更多品牌案例的支持,且不同類型的商品亦有需微調的參數,未來可繼續在本研究的基礎上探討該集團後續品牌發展或他企業同質性品牌創業之間的案例探討,以期能整理出一套具有可操作性的品牌發展策略框架供中小企業做企業成長轉型的依據。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are the cornerstone of Taiwan’s economic development. According to the “2023 SME White Paper” released by the Small and Medium Enterprise Administration of Taiwan Ministry of Economic Affairs, there were more than 1.63 million SMEs in Taiwan in 2022, accounting for over 98% of all enterprises. These SMEs employed 9.13 million people, representing 50% of the national workforce. Their sales exceeded NT$28 trillion, accounting for over 50% of total sales, and their export value reached NT$3.6 trillion, with an annual growth rate of over 7%. However, SMEs often face two major challenges in establishing their own brands to escape the competitive pressures of the OEM model and achieve sustainable development, thus hindering their ability to enhance competitiveness:
1. Limited Resources (Capital): SMEs must effectively integrate resources and strategically analyze investments in products or technologies, using time to gain growth opportunities. In contrast, large enterprises, with their abundant resources, have higher risk tolerance and more flexible control over investment timing, allowing them to capture niche markets first. 2. Limited Human Resources: SMEs often need to invest in the emotional value of employees to differentiate themselves from large enterprises in recruitment and retention. However, the advantage of better salaries offered by large enterprises remains the primary reason for attracting talent in Taiwan’s labor market. Consequently, large enterprises’ monopolization of top talent poses a survival challenge for SMEs. The fastest yet most challenging growth pathway for SMEs is brand establishment. A good brand strategy can not only accelerate the growth of large corporations but also help SMEs quickly deepen their international influence. Through brand marketing and operations, a single cross-industry collaboration can expand the brand’s global visibility, gradually building brand strength to accelerate future operational capital. This study analyzes how the LS Group has successively developed Taiwan brands ZUNI, ENL, and Zsel through internal cross-brand collaboration. By capturing market demand—from mainstream to personalized, and eventually to individualization—the group has fostered a relay system where each brand builds upon the technology and resources of the previous one. This process is combined with traditional craftsmanship and an artisan spirit, returning to simplicity to create products with emotional value. The co-creation of products with consumers has become a driving force behind LS Group's growth. While this research organizes and analyzes ZUNI's success in carrying forward traditional shoe material production, as well as ENL's strategic development shortcomings and corrective suggestions compared to ZUNI, more brand case studies are required to create a replicable template for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Different types of products may also require adjusted parameters. Future research could further explore the development of subsequent brands within the LS Group or examine case studies of similar brand startups in other companies, with the goal of formulating an actionable brand development strategy framework that SMEs can rely on for business growth and transformation. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-02-19T16:40:29Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-02-19T16:40:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
致謝 II 中文摘要 III ABSTRACT IV 目次 VI 圖次 VII 表次 VIII 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 研究內容與框架 3 第二章 文獻探討 4 2.1 品牌及品發展策略 4 2.2 策略創業 7 2.3 資源基礎觀點(Resource-Based View, RBV) 15 2.4 動態能力理論 16 第三章 研究方法與設計 17 3.1 研究方法 17 3.2 資料搜集和分析 22 第四章 個案描述 24 4.1 LS集團組織和旗下品牌簡介 24 4.2 集團發展各階段 26 第五章 個案分析 31 5.1 1990~2002年OEM代工時期 31 5.2 2003~2019年品牌企業發展第二曲線時期 37 5.3 2020年以後多品牌發展時期 44 5.4 二次品牌發展的SWOT分析和LS集團品牌發展成功要素分析 53 第六章 結論與建議 56 6.1 研究結論 56 6.2 研究限制 59 參考文獻 61 圖次 圖 2-1 策略創業研究架構 8 圖 2-2 策略創業投入-過程-產出模型 9 圖 3-1 研究流程步驟圖 23 圖 4-1 LS集團沿革圖 25 圖 4-2 鞋材歷年業績 28 圖 4-3 鞋材和ZUNI 毛利對比圖 30 圖 5-1 OEM代工時期之策略創業投入階段 32 圖 5-2 OEM代工時期之策略創業過程階段 34 圖 5-3 OEM代工時期之策略創業產出階段 35 圖 5-4 OEM代工時期之策略創業發展歷程 36 圖 5-5 品牌企業發展第二曲線時期之策略創業投入階段 39 圖 5-6 品牌企業發展第二曲線時期之策略創業過程階段 41 圖 5-7 品牌企業發展第二曲線時期之策略創業產出階段 43 圖 5-8 品牌企業發展第二曲線時期之策略創業發展歷程 44 圖 5-9 多品牌发展时期之策略创业投⼊阶段 46 圖 5-10 多品牌發展時期之策略創業過程階段 49 圖 5-11 多品牌發展時期之策略創業產出階段 51 圖 5-12 品牌企業發展第二曲線時期之策略創業發展歷程 52 表次 表 5-1 ZUNI和ENL品牌發展SWOT分析 53 表 5-2 品牌發展成功要素分析 55 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 品牌 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 策略創業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 品牌發展 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Strategic entrepreneurship | en |
| dc.subject | Brand | en |
| dc.subject | Brand development | en |
| dc.title | 以策略創業觀點探討品牌策略之演化─以LS集團為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Exploring Brand Strategies Developing Process from Strategic Entrepreneurship Perspective-The Case of Enterprise LS Group | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鄭明;金立印;陳俊忠 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Ming Zheng;Liyin Jin ;Chun-Chung Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 品牌,品牌發展,策略創業, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Brand,Brand development,Strategic entrepreneurship, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 63 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202404585 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-11-25 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 臺大-復旦EMBA境外專班 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | N/A | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 臺大-復旦EMBA境外專班 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.5 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
