請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96256完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林維真 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Weijane Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李孟儒 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Meng-Ju Lee | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-28T16:26:06Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-11-29 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-11-28 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-11-14 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
平山令明 (2020)。香氣的科學（黃怡筠譯）。晨星出版。 吳京一、童麗珠 (2017)。簡介工作記憶及其腦內機制。科學教育月刊，(398)，2-12。https://doi.org/10.6216/sem.201705_(398).0001 吳英美 (1998)。視障讀者對有聲書的需求調查─以彰化師大圖書館為例。書苑季刊，38，16-25。 李冠逸、林君臻、楊筑安 (2017)。 台灣人熟悉的嗅聞氣味初探 [An Exploration of Familiar Odors in Taiwan]。 臺灣職能治療研究與實務雜誌，13(2)，61-70。https://doi.org/10.6534/jtotrp.201712_13(2).0001 李貴連、嚴貞 (2008)。「五感」設計模式之建構初探－以食品類包裝設計為例。設計研究，8，156-164。 https://doi.org/10.30178/sjyj.200807.0019 杞昭安 (2014)。視障輔具圖解。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系出版。 身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定辦法 (2013，9月2日)。全國法規資料庫。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0080065 身心障礙者權益保障法 (2021，1月20日)。全國法規資料庫。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0050046 林巧敏 (2016a)。公共圖書館提供身心障礙讀者服務問題之探討 [A Study on Public Library Services for People with Disabilities in Taiwan]。大學圖書館， 20(2)，33-55。https://doi.org/10.6146/univj.20-2.03 林巧敏 (2016b)。圖書館身心障礙讀者服務指南研究。國立臺灣圖書館委託研究報告。 林巧敏 (2016c)。臺灣地區圖書館身心障礙讀者服務現況與意見調查 [Survey of Current Conditions and Opinions on Providing Library Services for People with Disabilities in Taiwan]。國家圖書館館刊，2， 99-126。 林巧敏 (2018)。從網站管理者視角分析圖書館網頁無障礙檢測結果 [An Evaluation on Library Websites Accessibility: From a Webmaster's Perspective]。圖資與檔案學刊，(93)，107-135。https://doi.org/10.6575/jila.201812_(93).0005 林巧敏 (2019)。視障及聽障者取用圖書館網頁資訊之無障礙分析[Assessing Library Web Accessibility for Visually or Hearing Impaired People]。圖書資訊學刊，17(1)，83-116。https://doi.org/10.6182/jlis.201906_17(1).083 林巧敏 (2021)。圖書館身心障礙讀者服務。元華文創。 林巧敏、賀迎春 (2015)。公共圖書館視障資源與服務現況調查 [A Study of the Resources and Services for Visually Impaired Patrons in Taiwan's Public Libraries]。圖書資訊學刊，13(1)，69-98。 https://doi.org/10.6182/jlis.2015.13(1).069 林光宇 (2005)。物理解題動畫作為高中生課後輔助教材之成效探討。﹝碩士論文。國立陽明交通大學理學院網路學習所﹞國立陽明交通大學機構典藏。http://hdl.handle.net/11536/80227 林依榕 (2023，8月8日)。土石流是什麼味道？唯一能靠「嗅覺」預警的危機 若聽到「1字＋火光閃電」，農業部：別遲疑！跑！ 今周刊新聞。https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/183027/post/202308080012/ 林怡文 (2012，1月13日)。一「嗅」萬千的巧妙。科學人。https://sa.ylib.com/MagArticle.aspx?id=1900 林聰吉 (2010)。我國視障圖書政策之分析：人權保障的觀點。臺灣圖書館管理季刊，6(2)，27-34。 林寶貴 (2016)。視覺輔具。全國特殊教育資訊網。https://special.moe.gov.tw/article.php?paid=167 泛科學。[科科抱抱]。(2018, March 10)。泛科ＴＶ【土石流來，不來？】（上篇）｜如果台灣沒有土石流會怎麼樣？ [Video]。YouTube。 https://youtu.be/V3CwDGiunDI?si=CfLavcrz_Ocez77p 邱瑩庭 (2015)。不同類別視障學生科學學習模式與學習需求之研究。﹝碩士論文。國立彰化師範大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/xms5fh 信望愛文教基金會(2023)。地理基礎講義-崩壞作用。地理種子教師團隊。https://www.learnmode.net/flip/book_reader/6622 高雄市正義中學 (2024)。高雄市正義中學112學年度第一學期高中部選修地科-地質環境第三次段考試題。歷屆試題。https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1g9MjLZhfWRAL45CVSICEzIpDscukiuaT 張愷倫、胡申瑜、歐聖榮 (2015)。花香對生理與心理情緒反應之探討－以梔子花為例 [Influences of Flower Scent on Respondents' Physiopsychological Responses: An Example of Gardenia]。造園景觀學報，20(4)， 43-59。 張瀚文 (2000)。視障者資訊尋求行為之調查研究：以臺灣省私立盲人重建院為例。中華圖書館學會會報，64，127-139。 張瓊文 (2011)。多媒體教材融入教學對國中生歷史學習成就。﹝碩士論文。稻江科技暨管理學院﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/k53s4h 張瓊方 (2005)。多媒體教學對在職教師數位教材製作成效之探討。﹝碩士論文。國立臺灣師範大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/tsz467 曹翠英 (2022)。圖書館對身心障礙者的閱讀服務：以國立臺灣圖書館為例。國家圖書館館刊，(2)，7-27。 章忠信 (2006)。聽覺與視覺障礙者合理使用著作之檢討。中原財經法學，17，57-97。 章忠信 (2020，7月6日)。視障者接觸著作之合理使用規定及其實務。http://www.copyrightnote.org/paper/pa0078.pdf 許民陽、吳惠雯、王郁軒 (2009)。以學生爲學習主體的國小高年級土石流防災課程教學研究[A Study on a Learner-centered Teaching Program of Debris Flow Disaster Prevention for High Graders in a Primary School]。課程與教學，13(1)，233-260。 郭怡汝 (2021，8月27日)。能看也能聞！首創氣味體驗盒，荷蘭莫瑞泰斯皇家美術館帶你重回17世紀。博物之島。https://museums.moc.gov.tw/Notice/NewsDetail/b31fa6ef-68d6-4113-b2e3-1ee31d42458b 陳怡佩 (2006) 。視覺障礙兒童及青少年的資訊需求。臺灣圖書館管理季刊，32-43。 陳美嘉 (2019，4月18日)。高市圖推明盲共讀閉眼睛閱讀開啟豐富想像。今日新聞。https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E9%AB%98%E5%B8%82%E5%9C%96%E6%8E%A8%E6%98%8E%E7%9B%B2%E5%85%B1%E8%AE%80-%E9%96%89%E7%9C%BC%E7%9D%9B%E9%96%B1%E8%AE%80%E9%96%8B%E5%95%9F%E8%B1%90%E5%AF%8C%E6%83%B3%E5%83%8F-103357699.html 彭佳宣 (2014) 。認知負荷理論運用於多媒體教學之啟示。國家教育研究院電子報，96。https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/edm.php?eg_name=%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E4%BA%A4%E6%B5%81%E9%81%93&edm_no=96&content_no=2330 曾如成。[台視新聞]。(2023, August 8)。聞到「土石流味」 加油站女員工拯救所有人 [Video]。YouTube。 https://youtu.be/PEQCXWkV7xo?si=VrK1fz-f4ozr5c1x 曾怡惇 (2009)。視障生參與化學實驗課初探。國小特殊教育，(47)，14-23。https://doi.org/10.7034/sees.200906.0014 曾怡惇、廖焜熙 (2011)。盲生化學實驗課合作教學行動研究 。特殊教育學報，(33)，1-28。https://doi.org/10.6768/jse.201106.0001 曾品方、廖英秀、謝春貞、郭靜如 (2020)。圖書資訊利用教育教學綱要圖書館利用的修訂說明。圖書教師電子報，72。 黃明居 (2016)。圖書館資訊科技與應用。國家圖書館秘書室（主編），中華民國一○五年圖書館年鑑（pp. 187-206）。臺北市：國家圖書館。 新竹縣二重國中 (2024)。113環境知識競賽題庫&影片。https://ecjh.hcc.edu.tw/p/406-1009-434558,r1961.php?Lang=zh-tw 楊尚樺 (2017)。視障地理教具之創新設計研究─ 以台灣立體地圖為例。﹝碩士論文。國立臺中教育大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3mfhwe 葉乃靜 (2017)。特殊版本圖書資源合作共享制度規劃之研究。國立臺灣圖書館委託研究。 農業部農村發展及水土保持署(無日期)。土石流特徵。土石流及大規模崩塌防災資訊網。2024年4月30日，取自https://246.ardswc.gov.tw/Info/Debris_Introduction 圖書館法 (2015，2月4日)。全國法規資料庫。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0010008 廖涵儀 (2007) 。中途失明視覺障礙者的感覺訓練。屏師特殊教育，14，20-28。 臺北市政府教育局 (2014)。視覺障礙學生的認識與輔導策略。融合教育現場教學手冊，29-34。 趙勻廷 (2020) 。嗅覺訓練。臨床醫學月刊，86(3)，528-532。https://doi.org/10.6666/ClinMed.202009_86(3).0095 趙欣怡 (2019)。誰的攝影藝術？建構視障觀眾多感官影像詮釋之無障礙科技展示方法 [Whose Photography Art? Development of Image Interpretative Methods and Accessible Displays for the Visually Impaired and Blind]。博物館學季刊，33(3)，43-69。https://doi.org/10.6686/MuseQ.201907_33(3).0003 歐陽麗真、林佳芬 (2012，6月8日)。學前課程應用多媒體輔助教學之行動研究。2012 第八屆知識社群國際研討會，臺北市，臺灣。 衛生福利部統計處 (2023，11月30日)。身心障礙者人數按類別及縣市別分。身心障礙統計專區。https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dos/cp-5224-62359-113.html 薛理桂、林巧敏 (2012)。視障圖書資源服務現況與相關法規之探討 [The Study on Current Situations and Relevant Regulations of Library Services for Visually Impaired People]。大學圖書館，16(2)， 20-39。https://doi.org/10.6146/univj.2012-16-2.02 韓筱瑄 (2021)。擴增回饋設計對視障學習者圖像閱讀理解之影響。﹝碩士論文。國立臺灣大學﹞。華藝線上圖書館。 Ackerman, D. (2007) 。感官之旅－感知的詩學（莊安祺譯）。時報文化。 Herz, R. (2009)。氣味之謎：主宰人類現在與未來生存的神祕感官（李曉筠譯）。方言文化。 Herz, R. (2023)。嗅覺之謎（李曉筠譯）。堡壘文化。 英文文獻 Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11. https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002 Alarfaj, A. A., Aldrweesh, A. K., Aldoughan, A. F., Alarfaj, S. M., Alabdulqader, F. K., & Alyahya, K. A. (2023). Olfactory dysfunction following COVID-19 and the potential benefits of olfactory training. Journal of clinical medicine, 12(14), 4761. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144761 Alary, F., Duquette, M., Goldstein, R., Elaine Chapman, C., Voss, P., La Buissonnière-Ariza, V., & Lepore, F. (2009). Tactile acuity in the blind: A closer look reveals superiority over the sighted in some but not all cutaneous tasks. Neuropsychologia, 47(10), 2037-2043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.014 American Library Association (2006, June 30). Library Bill of Rights. ALA. http://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/librarybill Archer, N. S., Bluff, A., Eddy, A., Nikhil, C. K., Hazell, N., Frank, D., & Johnston, A. (2022). Odour enhances the sense of presence in a virtual reality environment. PloS one, 17(3), e0265039. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265039 Arshamian, A., & Larsson, M. (2014). Same but different: the case of olfactory imagery. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00034 Arshamian, A., Gerkin, R. C., Kruspe, N., Wnuk, E., Floyd, S., O’Meara, C., Garrido Rodriguez, G., Lundström, J. N., Mainland, J. D., & Majid, A. (2022). The perception of odor pleasantness is shared across cultures. Current Biology, 32(9), 2061-2066.e2063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.062 Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-559. Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2 Beaulieu-Lefebvre, M., Schneider, F. C., Kupers, R., & Ptito, M. (2011). Odor perception and odor awareness in congenital blindness. Brain Research Bulletin, 84(3), 206-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2010.12.014 Bensafi, M., & Rouby, C. (2007). Individual differences in odor imaging ability reflect differences in olfactory and emotional perception. Chemical senses, 32(3), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjl051 Bordegoni, M., Carulli, M., Shi, Y., & Ruscio, D. (2017). Investigating the effects of odour integration in reading and learning experiences. ID&A INTERACTION DESIGN & ARCHITECTURE (S), 32, 104-125. Braun, A. (2016). The sensory compensation hypothesis. In The speaker identification ability of blind and sighted listeners: An empirical investigation (pp. 27-29). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15198-0_1 Braun, M., Pradana, G., Buchanan, G., Cheok, A., Velasco, C., Spence, C., Aduriz, A., Gross, J., & Lasa, D. (2016). Emotional priming of digital images through mobile telesmell and virtual food. International Journal of Food Design, 1, 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1386/ijfd.1.1.29_1 Brumley, M. R., & Robinson, S. R. (2010). Experience in the perinatal development of action systems. In Oxford handbook of developmental behavioral neuroscience. (pp. 181-209). Oxford University Press. Burgess, M. (2016, May 20). We got sprayed in the face by a 9D television. WIRED. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/9d-television-touch-smell-taste Bushdid, C., Magnasco, M. O., Vosshall, L. B., & Keller, A. (2014). Humans can discriminate more than 1 trillion olfactory stimuli. Science, 343(6177), 1370-1372. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1249168 Butowt, R., Bilinska, K., & von Bartheld, C. S. (2023). Olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19: new insights into the underlying mechanisms. Trends in Neurosciences, 46(1), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2022.11.003 Cain, W. S. (1982). Odor identification by males and females: Predictions vs performance. Chemical Senses, 7, 129-142. Carmigniani, J., Furht, B., Anisetti, M., Ceravolo, P., Damiani, E., & Ivkovic, M. (2011). Augmented reality technologies, systems, and applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 51(1), 341-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-010-0660-6 Carmody, T. (2013, February 22). Trick out your tongue and taste the sensory-augmented world with Tongueduino. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2013/2/21/4014472/trick-out-your-tongue-taste-the-world-with-tongueduino Cho, J. D. (2021). A study of multi-sensory experience and color recognition in visual arts appreciation of people with visual impairment. Electronics, 10(4),470. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10040470 Cho, J. D., Quero, L. C., Bartolomé, J. I., Lee, D. W., Oh, U., & Lee, I. (2021). Tactile colour pictogram to improve artwork appreciation of people with visual impairments. Color Research & Application, 46(1), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22567 Choi, N., Yamanaka, T., Takemura, A., Kobayashi, T., Eto, A., & Hirano, M. (2022). Impact of indoor aroma on students’ mood and learning performance. Building and Environment, 223, 109490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109490 Chu, S., & Downes, J. J. (2000). Odour-evoked autobiographical memories: Psychological investigations of Proustian phenomena. Chemical Senses, 25(1), 111-116. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/25.1.111 Çomoğlu, Ş., Orhan, K. S., Kocaman, S. Ü., Çelik, M., Keleş, N., & Değer, K. (2015). Olfactory function assessment of blind subjects using the Sniffin’ Sticks Test. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 153(2), 286-290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599815583975 Cornell Kärnekull, S., Arshamian, A., Nilsson, M. E., & Larsson, M. (2016). From perception to metacognition: Auditory and olfactory functions in early blind, late blind, and sighted individuals. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01450 Covaci, A., Zou, L., Tal, I., Muntean, G.-M., & Ghinea, G. (2018). Is multimedia multisensorial? - A review of mulsemedia systems. ACM Comput. Surv., 51(5), Article 91. https://doi.org/10.1145/3233774 Cuevas, I., Plaza, P., Rombaux, P., Collignon, O., De Volder, A. G., & Renier, L. (2010). Do people who became blind early in life develop a better sense of smell? A psychophysical study. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 104(6), 369-379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1010400607 Cuevas, I., Plaza, P., Rombaux, P., De Volder, A. G., & Renier, L. (2009). Odour discrimination and identification are improved in early blindness. Neuropsychologia, 47(14), 3079-3083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.07.004 Dilks, D.D., Dalton, P., and Beauchamp, G.K. (1999). Cross-cultural variation in responses to malodors. Chem. Senses, 24, 599. Djajadiningrat, T., Overbeeke, K., & Wensveen, S. (2002). But how, donald, tell us how? on the creation of meaning in interaction design through feedforward and inherent feedback. Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, London, England. https://doi.org/10.1145/778712.778752 Doty, R. L., Applebaum, S., Zusho, H., & Settle, R. G. (1985). Sex differences in odor identification ability: A cross-cultural analysis. Neuropsychologia, 23(5), 667-672. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(85)90067-3 Doucé, L., & Janssens, W. (2013). The presence of a pleasant ambient scent in a fashion store: The moderating role of shopping motivation and affect intensity. Environment and Behavior, 45(2), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511410421 Ebadi, S., & Ashrafabadi, F. (2022). An exploration into the impact of augmented reality on EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9745-9765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11021-8 Edirisinghe, C., Podari, N., & Cheok, A. D. (2022). A multi-sensory interactive reading experience for visually impaired children; a user evaluation. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 26(3), 807-819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-018-1127-4 Engen, T. (1982). The perception of odors. New York: Academic Press. Engen, T. (1991). Odor sensation and memory. New York: Praeger. Epple, G., & Herz, R. S. (1999). Ambient odors associated to failure influence cognitive performance in children. Developmental psychobiology, 35(2), 103–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2302(199909)35:2<103::aid-dev3>3.0.co;2-4 Erskine, S. E., & Philpott, C. M. (2020). An unmet need: Patients with smell and taste disorders. Clinical Otolaryngology, 45(2), 197-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13484 Fantin, L., Ceyte, H., Ramdane-Cherif, Z., Jacquot, M., & Hossu, G. (2020). French Vividness of Olfactory Imagery Questionnaire: A potential tool for diagnosing olfactory loss by assessing olfactory imagery? [Brief Research Report]. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.606667 Feng, A., Chen, Y. V., Li, R., & Ding, L. (2019). How smell can help visually impaired in health and well-being – a cognitive experiment. The Design Journal, 22(1), 371-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1595426 Ferdenzi, C., Delplanque, S., Barbosa, P., Court, K., Guinard, J.-X., Guo, T., Craig Roberts, S., Schirmer, A., Porcherot, C., Cayeux, I., Sander, D., & Grandjean, D. (2013). Affective semantic space of scents. Towards a universal scale to measure self-reported odor-related feelings. Food Quality and Preference, 30(2), 128-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.04.010 Fernandez, A., Fernandez, P., López, G., Calderón, M., & Guerrero, L. A. (2015). Troyoculus: An augmented reality system to improve reading capabilities of night-blind people. Ambient Assisted Living. ICT-based Solutions in Real Life Situations, Cham. Forster, B., Eardley, A. F., & Eimer, M. (2007). Altered tactile spatial attention in the early blind. Brain Research, 1131, 149-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.11.004 Gagnon, L., Ismaili, A. R. A., Ptito, M., & Kupers, R. (2015). Superior orthonasal but not retronasal olfactory skills in congenital blindness. PLOS ONE, 10(3), e0122567. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122567 Gallace, A., Ngo, M. K., Sulaitis, J., & Spence, C. (2012). Multisensory presence in virtual reality: possibilities & limitations. In G. Ghinea, F. Andres, & S. Gulliver (Eds.), Multiple Sensorial Media Advances and Applications: New Developments in MulSeMedia (pp. 1-38). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-821-7.ch001 Garzón, J. (2021). An overview of twenty-five years of augmented reality in education. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 5(7), 37. https://www.mdpi.com/2414-4088/5/7/37 Gerkin, R. C., & Castro, J. B. (2015). The number of olfactory stimuli that humans can discriminate is still unknown. eLife, 4, e08127. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08127 Gilbert, A. N., Crouch, M., & Kemp, S. E. (1998). Olfactory and visual mental imagery. Journal of Mental Imagery, 22, 137–146. Grosofsky, A., Haupert, M. L., & Versteeg, S. W. (2011). An exploratory investigation of coffee and lemon scents and odor identification. Perceptual and motor skills, 112(2), 536–538. https://doi.org/10.2466/24.PMS.112.2.536-538 Gulas, C. S., & Bloch, P. H. (1995). Right under our noses: Ambient scent and consumer responses. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10(1), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249272 Hackländer, R. P. M., & Bermeitinger, C. (2018). Olfactory context dependent memory: direct presentation of odorants. Journal of visualized experiments: JoVE, (139), 58170. https://doi.org/10.3791/58170 Han, P., Su, T., Qin, M., Chen, H., & Hummel, T. (2021). A systematic review of olfactory related questionnaires and scales. Rhinology, 59(2), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin20.291 Hedner, M., Larsson, M., Arnold, N., Zucco, G. M., & Hummel, T. (2010). Cognitive factors in odor detection, odor discrimination, and odor identification tasks. Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 32(10), 1062–1067. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803391003683070 Herz, R. (2001). Ah, sweet skunk! Why we like or dislike what we smell. Cerebrum, 3, 31–47. Herz, R. (2005). Odor-associative learning and emotion: Effects on perception and behavior. Chemical Senses, 30(suppl_1), i250-i251. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjh209 Herz, R. (2006). I know what I like: understanding odor preferences. The smell culture reader. Herz, R. (2009). Aromatherapy facts and fictions: A scientific analysis of olfactory effects on mood, physiology and behavior. International Journal of Neuroscience, 119(2), 263-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450802333953 Herz, R. S., & Bajec, M. R. (2022). Your money or your sense of smell? A comparative analysis of the sensory and psychological value of olfaction. Brain Sciences, 12(3), 299. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12030299 Herz, R. S., & Engen, T. (1996). Odor memory: Review and analysis. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 3(3), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210754 Herz, R., & von Clef, J. (2001). The influence of verbal labeling on the perception of odors: Evidence for olfactory illusions? Perception, 30(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3179 Herz, R., Schankler, C., & Beland, S. (2004). Olfaction, emotion and associative learning: Effects on motivated behavior. Motivation and Emotion, 28(4), 363-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-004-2389-x Hirsch, A. R. (1995). Effects of ambient odors on slot-machine usage in a las vegas casino. Psychology & Marketing, 12(7), 585-594. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220120703 Ho, C., & Spence, C. (2005). Olfactory facilitation of dual-task performance. Neuroscience Letters, 389(1), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2005.07.003 Hötting, K., & Röder, B. (2009). Auditory and auditory-tactile processing in congenitally blind humans. Hearing Research, 258(1), 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2009.07.012 Howorth, S. K., Rooks-Ellis, D., Flanagan, S., & Ok, M. W. (2019). Augmented reality supporting reading skills of students with autism spectrum disorder. Intervention in School and Clinic, 55(2), 71-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451219837635 Hummel, T., & Nordin, S. (2005). Olfactory disorders and their consequences for quality of life. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 125(2), 116-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480410022787 Hummel, T., Kobal, G., Gudziol, H., & Mackay-Sim, A. (2007). Normative data for the “Sniffin’ Sticks” including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 264(3), 237-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006-0173-0 Hummel, T., Sekinger, B., Wolf, S. R., Pauli, E., & Kobal, G. (1997). ‘Sniffin’ Sticks': Olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chemical Senses, 22(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/22.1.39 Hung, S.-W., Chang, C.-W., & Ma, Y.-C. (2021). A new reality: Exploring continuance intention to use mobile augmented reality for entertainment purposes. Technology in Society, 67, 101757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101757 Hwang, A. H.-C., Oh, J., & Scheinbaum, A. C. (2020). Interactive music for multisensory e-commerce: The moderating role of online consumer involvement in experiential value, cognitive value, and purchase intention. Psychology & Marketing, 37(8), 1031-1056. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21338 Kadowaki, A., Sato, J., Bannai, Y., & Okada, K. i. (2007). Presentation technique of scent to avoid olfactory adaptation. 17th International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence (ICAT 2007) , Esbjerg, Denmark, 97-104. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4414621 Kesim, M., & Ozarslan, Y. (2012). Augmented reality in education: Current technologies and the potential for education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 297-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.654 Kolarik, A. J., Raman, R., Moore, B. C. J., Cirstea, S., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Pardhan, S. (2020). The accuracy of auditory spatial judgments in the visually impaired is dependent on sound source distance. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 7169. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64306-8 Kothgassner, O. D., Goreis, A., Kafka, J. X., Van Eickels, R. L., Plener, P. L., & Felnhofer, A. (2019). Virtual reality exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD): a meta-analysis. European journal of psychotraumatology, 10(1), 1654782. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2019.1654782 Kupers, R., & Ptito, M. (2014). Compensatory plasticity and cross-modal reorganization following early visual deprivation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 41, 36-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.08.001 Larsson, M., Finkel, D., & Pedersen, N. L. (2000). Odor identification: Influences of age, gender, cognition, and personality. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 55(5), 304-310. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/55.5.P304 Lee, C.-I., Xiao, F.-R., & Hsu, Y.-W. (2020). AR book-finding behavior of users in library venue. Applied Sciences, 10(20), 7349. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/20/7349 Li, S., Chen, J., Li, M., Lin, J., & Wang, G. (2017). ColorOdor: Odor broadens the color identification of the blind. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053186 Liu, C., Huot, S., Diehl, J., Mackay, W., & Beaudouin-Lafon, M. (2012). Evaluating the benefits of real-time feedback in mobile augmented reality with hand-held devices. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Austin, Texas, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208706 Liu, Y., Stiles, N. R. B., & Meister, M. (2018). Augmented reality powers a cognitive assistant for the blind. eLife, 7, e37841. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37841 Lo Valvo, A., Croce, D., Garlisi, D., Giuliano, F., Giarré, L., & Tinnirello, I. (2021). A navigation and augmented reality system for visually impaired people. Sensors, 21(9), 3061. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/9/3061 Løkken, I. M., Campbell, J. A., Kucirkova, N. I., & Dale, P. (2023). Experiment protocol: Exploring the sense of smell in digital book reading. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100285 Magill, R., & Anderson, D. I. (2010). Motor learning and control. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing. Majchrzak, D., Eberhard, J., Kalaus, B., & Wagner, K.-H. (2017). Do visually impaired people develop superior smell ability? Perception, 46(10), 1171-1182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006617717942 Manzini, I., Frasnelli, J., & Croy, I. (2014). Wie wir riechen und was es für uns bedeutet : Grundlagen des Geruchssinns [How we smell and what it means to us: basic principles of the sense of smell]. HNO, 62(12), 846–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-014-2925-2 Mattos, J. L., Schlosser, R. J., Storck, K. A., & Soler, Z. M. (2017). Understanding the relationship between olfactory-specific quality of life, objective olfactory loss, and patient factors in chronic rhinosinusitis. International forum of allergy & rhinology, 7(7), 734–740. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21940 Mayer, R. E.(2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press. Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 357-371. Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. (pp. 31-48). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816819.004 Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning, 2nd ed [doi:10.1017/CBO9780511811678]. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678 Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 2nd ed. (pp. 43-71). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.005 McKie, R. (2017, October 28). Virtual reality headsets could put children’s health at risk. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/oct/28/virtual-reality-headset-children-cognitive-problems Mikułowski, D., & Brzostek-Pawłowska, J. (2020). Multi-sensual augmented reality in interactive accessible math tutoring system for flipped classroom. Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 16th International Conference, ITS 2020, Athens, Greece, June 8–12, 2020, Proceedings, 12149, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49663-0_1 Millar, S. (2004). Reading by Touch in Blind Children and Adults. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of Children’s Literacy, 437-457. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1731-1_23 Millot, J.-L., Brand, G., & Morand, N. (2002). Effects of ambient odors on reaction time in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 322(2), 79-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(02)00092-7 Moinuddin, A., Goel, A., & Sethi, Y. (2021). The role of augmented feedback on motor learning: A systematic review. Cureus, 13(11), e19695. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19695 Monnery-Patris, S., Rouby, C., Nicklaus, S., & Issanchou, S. (2009). Development of olfactory ability in children: sensitivity and identification. Developmental psychobiology, 51(3), 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20363 Moss, M., Earl, V. , Moss, L. and Heffernan, T. (2017). Any sense in classroom scents? Aroma of rosemary essential oil significantly improves cognition in young school children. Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science, 7, 450463. https://doi.org/10.4236/aces.2017.74032 Murphy, C., & Cain, W. S. (1986). Odor identification: The blind are better. Physiology & Behavior, 37(1), 177-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(86)90402-6 Niedenthal, S., Fredborg, W., Lundén, P., Ehrndal, M., & Olofsson, J. K. (2023). A graspable olfactory display for virtual reality. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 169, 102928. https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102928 Nordin, S., & Brämerson, A. (2008). Complaints of olfactory disorders: epidemiology, assessment and clinical implications. Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology, 8(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0b013e3282f3f473 Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press. Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Journal of Psychology , 45(3), 255-287. Parhizkar, B., & Badioze Zaman, H. (2009). Development of an Augmented Reality Rare Book and Manuscript for Special Library Collection (AR Rare-BM). Visual Informatics: Bridging Research and Practice, Berlin, Heidelberg. Petancevski, E. L., Inns, J., Fransen, J., & Impellizzeri, F. M. (2022). The effect of augmented feedback on the performance and learning of gross motor and sport-specific skills: A systematic review. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 63, 102277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102277 Ranasinghe, N., Koh, K. C. R., Tram, N. T. N., Liangkun, Y., Shamaiah, K., Choo, S. G., Tolley, D., Karwita, S., Chew, B., Chua, D., & Yi-Luen Do, E. (2019). Tainted: An olfaction-enhanced game narrative for smelling virtual ghosts. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 125, 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.11.011 Romantshik, O., Porter, R., Tillmann, V., & Varendi, H. (2007). Preliminary evidence of a sensitive period for olfactory learning by human newborns. Acta Paediatrica, 96(3), 372-376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.00106.x Rondinelli, R. D., Genovese, E., Katz, R. T., Mayer, T. G., Mueller, K. L., Ranavaya, M. I., & Brigham, C. R. (2008). AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (6th ed.). American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/978-1-57947-888-9 Savela, N., Oksanen, A., Kaakinen, M., Noreikis, M., & Xiao, Y. (2020). Does augmented reality affect sociability, entertainment, and learning? A field experiment. Applied Sciences, 10(4), 1392. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/4/1392 Schaal, B., Hummel, T., & Soussignan, R. (2004). Olfaction in the fetal and premature infant: functional status and clinical implications. Clinics in Perinatology, 31(2), 261-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2004.04.003 Schifferstein, H. N. J. (2006). The perceived importance of sensory modalities in product usage: A study of self-reports. Acta Psychologica, 121(1), 41-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.06.004 Schunk, D. H. (1996). Learning theories: An educational perspective (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill. Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 411-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.006 Shen, J., Dong, Z., Qin, D., Lin, J., & Li, Y. (2020). iVision: An assistive system for the blind based on augmented reality and machine learning. Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Design Approaches and Supporting Technologies, Cham. Shepherd, I. (2001). Providing learning support for blind and visually impaired students undertaking fieldwork and related activities. Sophie Chang, C.-H., Kuo, C.-C., Hou, H.-T., & Ying Koe, J. J. (2022). Design and evaluation of a multi-sensory scaffolding gamification science course with mobile technology for learners with total blindness. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107085 Sorokowska, A. (2016). Olfactory performance in a large sample of early-blind and late-blind individuals. Chemical Senses, 41(8), 703-709. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjw081 Sorokowska, A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). No sensory compensation for olfactory memory: Differences between blind and sighted people. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2127. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02127 Sorokowska, A., Nord, M., Stefańczyk, M. M., & Larsson, M. (2022). Odor-based context-dependent memory: Influence of olfactory cues on declarative and nondeclarative memory indices. Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 29(5), 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.053562.121 Sorokowska, A., Sorokowski, P., Karwowski, M., Larsson, M., & Hummel, T. (2019). Olfactory perception and blindness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Research, 83(8), 1595-1611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1035-2 Sorokowski, P., Karwowski, M., Misiak, M., Marczak, M. K., Dziekan, M., Hummel, T., & Sorokowska, A. (2019). Sex differences in human olfaction: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 242. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00242 Spangenberg, E. R., Crowley, A. E., & Henderson, P. W. (1996). Improving the store environment: Do olfactory cues affect evaluations and behaviors? Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299606000205 Spence C. (2020). Scenting the anosmic cube: On the use of ambient scent in the context of the art gallery or museum. i-Perception, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669520966628 Spence, C. (2015). Just how much of what we taste derives from the sense of smell? Flavour, 4(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13411-015-0040-2 Spence, C. (2020). Scent and the cinema. i-Perception, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669520969710 Spence, C. (2021). Scenting entertainment: Virtual reality storytelling, theme park rides, gambling, and video-gaming. i-Perception, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695211034538 Stevenson, R. J., & Case, T. I. (2005). Olfactory imagery: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(2), 244-264. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196369 Stogbauer, J., Wirkner, K., Engel, C., Moebus, S., Pundt, N., Teismann, H., Loffler, M., Hummel, T., Beule, A. G., & Berger, K. (2020). Prevalence and risk factors of smell dysfunction - a comparison between five German population-based studies. Rhinology, 58(2), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin19.181 Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285. Tan, J. (2012, November 26). SCENTsory entertainment: The engineering behind Smell-o-vision. Illumin Magazine. https://illumin.usc.edu/scentsory-entertainment-the-engineering-behind-smell-o-vision/ Tang, Q., Guo, G., & Zeng, M. (2021). The effect of peppermint odour on fatigue and vigilance in conditional automated vehicle. International Journal of Vehicle Performance, 7(3-4), 266-278. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVP.2021.116060 Terner, K., Nagy, L., & Jávor, T. (1987). Taste threshold determinations on dyspeptic patients and on blind controls. International journal of clinical pharmacology research, 7(6), 507-511. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/3440642 Thangaleela, S., Sivamaruthi, B. S., Kesika, P., Bharathi, M., Kunaviktikul, W., Klunklin, A., Chanthapoon, C., & Chaiyasut, C. (2022). Essential oils, phytoncides, aromachology, and aromatherapy— a review. Applied Sciences, 12(9), 4495. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/9/4495 Tomiczek, C., & Stevenson, R. J. (2009). Olfactory imagery and repetition priming: The effect of odor naming and imagery ability. Experimental psychology, 56(6), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.56.6.397 Verbeek, C., Leemans, I., & Fleming, B. (2022). How can scents enhance the impact of guided museum tours? towards an impact approach for olfactory museology. The Senses and Society, 17(3), 315-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2022.2142012 Wang, X., Zhang, C., Xia, X., Yang, Y., & Zhou, C. (2019). Effect of gender on odor identification at different life stages: a meta-analysis. Rhinology, 57(5), 322–330. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin19.005 Washburn, D. A., Jones Moore, L., Satya, R. V., Bowers, C. A., & Cortes, A. (2003). Olfactory use in virtual environment training. Modeling & Simulation Magazine, 2, 19-25. Wittrock, M. C. (1989). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24, 345-376. World Health Organization. (2020). World report on vision. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241516570 Wu, H.-K., Lee, S. W.-Y., Chang, H.-Y., & Liang, J.-C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024 Wyatt, T. D. (2010). Pheromones and signature mixtures: defining species-wide signals and variable cues for identity in both invertebrates and vertebrates. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 196(10), 685-700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-010-0564-y Xiao, W., Sun, Z., Yan, X., Gao, X., Lv, Q., & Wei, Y. (2021). Differences in olfactory habituation between orthonasal and retronasal pathways. The Journal of Physiological Sciences, 71(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12576-021-00822-0 Yim, M. Y.-C., Chu, S.-C., & Sauer, P. L. (2017). Is augmented reality technology an effective tool for E-commerce? An interactivity and vividness perspective. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 39(1), 89-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2017.04.001 Zatorre, R. J., Jones-Gotman, M., Evans, A. C., & Meyer, E. (1992). Functional localization and lateralization of human olfactory cortex. Nature, 360(6402), 339-340. https://doi.org/10.1038/360339a0 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96256 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 視障學生在地理學習中面臨多重挑戰，尤其是傳統以視覺為主的教學模式，對於視障生的地理學習相當不利。針對此問題，本研究旨在探討擴增嗅覺回饋的應用，以期改善視障學生的地理學習成效。基於氣味與記憶的關聯性，本研究在地理教學活動中引入嗅覺刺激，期望通過多感官學習模式提升視障學生的學習效果，並藉由氣味聯結增強內容記憶。本研究選取與日常生活及防災教育密切相關的土石流作為學習主題，採用實驗法探究擴增嗅覺回饋對視障學生學習效果及嗅覺心像能力的影響，並在實驗後進行訪談了解學生對於氣味融入學習環境的看法。
本研究邀請了14名國、高中視障學生參與，且嗅覺能力表現均正常。在地理學習的活動中，實驗組加入模擬土石流的環境氣味進行多感官地理學習，並與無氣味刺激的控制組進行比較。由於樣本數及個人對氣味的感知和偏好等存在差異，研究結果顯示擴增嗅覺回饋對地理學習成效及嗅覺心像能力的提升並不顯著。 然而，根據訪談結果表示，擴增嗅覺回饋可支持視障學生的多感官學習，尤其在提升學習興趣、理解力及記憶力方面。在圖書館等自學空間中，擴增嗅覺回饋輔助閱讀有助於提升讀者的理解力和沉浸感，顯示出嗅覺輔助學習的潛力。 本研究為圖書館及學校視障教育應用上提供擴增嗅覺回饋輔助閱讀與學習成效的初步參考，未來可進一步擴展至其他學科進行相關研究。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Visually impaired students face multiple challenges in geography learning, particularly due to traditional visual-centric teaching methods that are significantly disadvantageous for them. This study aims to explore the application of augmented olfactory feedback to improve the geographical learning outcomes of visually impaired students. Based on the relationship between scent and memory, the research introduces olfactory stimuli into geography teaching activities, with the hope of enhancing learning effectiveness through a multi-sensory learning model and strengthening content memory through scent associations. The study focuses on landslides, a topic closely related to daily life and disaster prevention education, employing an experimental method to investigate the impact of augmented olfactory feedback on the learning outcomes and olfactory imagery abilities of visually impaired students. Interviews were conducted after the experiment to understand students' perspectives on the integration of scents into the learning environment.
Fourteen visually impaired students from junior and senior high schools were invited to participate, all demonstrating normal olfactory abilities. In the geography learning activities, the experimental group engaged in multi-sensory geography learning with simulated environmental scents of landslides, compared to a control group with no olfactory stimuli. Due to variations in sample size and individual perceptions and preferences for scents, the results indicated that augmented olfactory feedback did not significantly enhance geography learning outcomes or olfactory imagery abilities. However, interview results suggested that augmented olfactory feedback can support multi-sensory learning for visually impaired students, particularly in enhancing learning interest, comprehension, and memory. In self-study environments like libraries, augmented olfactory feedback can assist reading, helping to improve readers' comprehension and immersion, highlighting the potential of scent-assisted learning. This study provides preliminary references for applying augmented olfactory feedback to assist reading and learning effectiveness in visually impaired education within libraries and schools, with the potential for further expansion into other subjects for related research. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-11-28T16:26:06Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-11-28T16:26:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 i
Abstract ii 圖次 vi 表次 vii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 4 第三節 研究範圍 5 第四節 名詞釋義 5 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 多媒體學習認知理論與視障者的學習 7 第二節 氣味、情緒與記憶 15 第三節 圖書館視障讀者服務 29 第三章 研究方法 35 第一節 研究設計 35 第二節 研究對象 40 第三節 研究工具 40 第四節 研究流程 45 第四章 研究結果與討論 49 第一節 研究參與者描述 49 第二節 視障生的學習成效 53 第三節 視障生的嗅覺心像能力 55 第四節 視障生的土石流防災態度 60 第五節 視障生地理學習經驗及難易度認知 62 第六節 視障生圖書館使用意願及影響因素 64 第七節 問題與發現 65 第五章 結論與建議 68 第一節 研究結果與發現 68 第二節 研究限制與未來建議 69 參考文獻 70 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.title | 擴增嗅覺回饋輔助視障生之 地理學習成效-以土石流為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | How Augmented Olfactory Feedback Assists Visually Impaired Students’ Learning of Mudslide in Geography | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 岳修平 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | Hsiu-Ping Yueh | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 徐式寬;張千惠 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Shihkuan Hsu;Chien-Huey Chang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 視障學生,擴增嗅覺回饋,地理學習,嗅覺心像,多感官學習,聯想學習,氣味記憶, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Visually impaired students,Augmented olfactory feedback,Geography learning,Olfactory imagery,Multisensory learning,Associative learning,Odor memory, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 86 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202404596 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-11-14 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2029-11-14 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 圖書資訊學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.29 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。