Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96119Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳譽仁 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yu-Jen Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 吳柏遠 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Pai-Yuan Wu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-14T16:06:19Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-11-15 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-11-14 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-10-27 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Amos, C., Holmes, G., & Strutton, D. (2008). Exploring the relationship between celebrity endorser effects and advertising effectiveness: A quantitative synthesis of effect size. International Journal of Advertising, 27(2), 209-234. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02650487.2008.11073052
Boush, D. M., Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (2009). Deception in the marketplace: The psychology of deceptive persuasion and consumer self-protection. Routledge. Chapter 3, "Deception in the Marketplace," pp. 34-56; Chapter 6, "Consumer Self-Protection," pp. 109-134. Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press. Chapter 1, "The Theory of Psychological Reactance," pp. 1-12; Chapter 2, "Determinants of the Magnitude of Reactance," pp. 13-38; Chapter 5, "Effects of Reactance on Persuasion," pp. 95-106. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Morris, K. J. (1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 805-818. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752-766. Childers, T. L., & Houston, M. J. (1984). Conditions for a picture-superiority effect on consumer memory. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(2), 643-654. Darke, P. R., & Ritchie, R. J. (2007). The defensive consumer: Advertising deception, defensive processing, and distrust. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(1), 114-127. DataReportal, Meltwater, & We Are Social. (2023, January 26). Number of internet and social media users worldwide as of January 2023 (in billions) [Graph]. In Statista. Retrieved March 21, 2023, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide/ Drumwright, M. E., & Murphy, P. E. (2009). The current state of advertising ethics: Industry and academic perspectives. Journal of Advertising, 38(1), 83-108. Eisend, M. (2006). Source credibility dimensions in marketing communication: A generalized solution. Journal of Empirical Generalisations in Marketing Science, 10(2), 1-33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228649951\\_Source\\_Credibility\\_Dimensions\\_in\\_Marketing\\_Communication-A\\_Generalized\\_Solution Eisingerich, A. B., & Bell, S. J. (2008). Perceived service quality and customer trust: Does enhancing customers' service knowledge matter? Journal of Service Research, 10(3), 256-268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670507310769 Emons, W. (1997). Credence Goods and Fraudulent Experts. The RAND Journal of Economics, 28(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555942 Erdogan, B. Z. (1999). Celebrity endorsement: A literature review. Journal of Marketing Management, 15(4), 291-314. Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1-31. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2004). Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega, 32(6), 407-424. Harrison, T. (2003). Understanding the behaviour of financial services consumers: A research agenda. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 8(1), 6-9. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fsm.4770102 Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635-650. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion; psychological studies of opinion change. Yale University Press. Chapter 2, "Credibility of the Communicator," pp. 19-55; Chapter 3, "Expertness and Influence," pp. 56-69. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1954-05952-000 Howcroft, B., Hamilton, R., & Hewer, P. (2007). Customer involvement and interaction in retail banking: An examination of risk and confidence in the purchase of financial products. Journal of Services Marketing, 21(7), 481-491. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040710824843 Jacoby, J. (1977). Information load and decision quality: Some contested issues. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(4), 569-573. Johar, J. S., & Sirgy, M. J. (1991). Value-expressive versus utilitarian advertising appeals: When and why to use which appeal. Journal of Advertising, 20(3), 23-33. Jordan, J., & Kaas, K. P. (2002). Advertising in the mutual fund business: The role of judgmental heuristics in private investors' evaluation of risk and return. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 7(2), 129-140. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall. Chapter 1, "Attention and Effort," pp. 1-12; Chapter 2, "Toward a Theory of Mental Effort," pp. 13-27. Kamins, M. A. (1990). An investigation into the "match-up" hypothesis in celebrity advertising: When beauty may be only skin deep. Journal of Advertising, 19(1), 4-13. Klapper, L., Lusardi, A., & van Oudheusden, P. (2020). Financial literacy and financial resilience: Evidence from around the world. 49(3), 589-614. DOI10.1111/fima.12283 Lafferty, B. A., & Goldsmith, R. E. (1999). Corporate credibility's role in consumers' attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the ad. Journal of Business Research, 44(2), 109-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00002-2 Lee, B. K., Ang, L., & Dubelaar, C. (2005). Lemons on the Web: A signalling approach to the problem of trust in Internet commerce. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(5), 607-623 Lee, S. P., & Moghavvemi, S. (2015). The dimension of service quality and its impact on customer satisfaction, trust, and loyalty: A case of Malaysian banks. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 8(2), 91-121. MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 48-65. Mitchell, A. A. (1986). The effect of verbal and visual components of advertisements on brand attitudes and attitude toward the advertisement. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(1), 12-24. Mitra, K., Reiss, M. C., & Capella, L. M. (1999). An examination of perceived risk, information search and behavioral intentions in search, experience and credence services. Journal of Services Marketing, 13(3), 208-228. Newell, S. J., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2001). The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 52(3), 235-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00104-6 Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311-329. Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers' perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39-52. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 69-81. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Communication and persuasion (pp. 1-24). Springer. Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades' evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243-281. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x Purohit, D., & Srivastava, J. (2001). Effect of manufacturer reputation, retailer reputation, and product warranty on consumer judgments of product quality: A cue diagnosticity framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(3), 123-134. Remund, D. L. (2010). Financial literacy explicated: The case for a clearer definition in an increasingly complex economy. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 44(2), 276-295. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1988). How do I feel about it? Informative functions of affective states. In K. Fiedler & J. Forgas (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and social behavior (pp. 44-62). Shapiro, S. P. (1984). The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology, 93(3), 623-658. https://doi.org/10.1086/228791 Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. Wang, Scheinbaum. (2017). Enhancing Brand Credibility Via Celebrity Endorsement Trustworthiness Trumps Attractiveness and Expertise. Journal of Advertising Research, 58(1), 16-32. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96119 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究探討金融顧問廣告中信任屬性與搜尋屬性對消費者參與意願的影響,並評估呈現方式(純文字 vs. 圖片加對話)和廣告可信度的作用。一般的觀念認為只要提供更多資訊,就能夠提升廣告效果(Emons, 1997; Mitra, 1999);但本研究發現在金融服務的場景中,附加資訊(如代言人圖片)的存在,可能會對描述信任與搜尋屬性的廣告產生不同的影響。
本研究借鑒了推敲可能性模型(Petty & Cacioppo, 1986)和線索診斷框架(Purohit & Srivastava, 2001),假設在純文字格式下,描述信任屬性的廣告相較於描述搜尋屬性的廣告會導致較低的可信度(H1)。研究同時提出廣告形式與屬性類型之間存在交互作用影響可信度(H2),其中在描述信任屬性的文字中加入代言人圖片會提高可信度(H2A),而在描述搜尋屬性的文字中加入代言人圖片則會降低可信度(H2B)。 三個假設在2(屬性類型:信任 vs. 搜尋)x 2(呈現方式:純文字 vs. 圖片加文字)的實驗設計中得以驗證。本文利用高品質數據平台Prolific進行調查,參與者被隨機分配接觸某一版本的金融服務廣告,展示不同組合的屬性類型和展示形式。研究結果得到廣告可信度(Appelman & Sundar, 2016;Kim & Sundar, 2012)及推敲可能性模型(Petty & Cacioppo, 1986)的研究支持,表明屬性類型、代言人圖片與展示形式之間的交互作用,顯著影響金融服務的消費者信任與決策。 本研究填補了文獻空白,探討金融服務廣告中屬性類型與展示形式如何影響消費者對可信度的感知和選擇。先前研究著重於信任屬性和搜尋屬性的特徵(Darby & Karni, 1973;Emons, 1997)以及代言人的重要性(Ohanian, 1990;Pornpitakpan, 2004),但少有研究檢視這些因素如何相互影響消費者的認知與意圖,尤其是廣告形式的調節作用。透過研究這些獨特的關聯,本研究為金融服務廣告的效果提供更細緻的洞察,具有理論和實務價值。 研究結果為金融機構提供寶貴建議,指出額外資訊(如代言人圖片)不一定能提高廣告效果,甚至可能對搜尋屬性廣告產生負面影響。透過多元回歸分析確定最佳的廣告屬性與展示形式組合,本研究有助於制定營銷策略,提高金融服務的消費者參與度。本文檢驗了廣告內容、代言人可信度與展示形式的互動,為金融服務廣告文獻(如Johnson & Peterson, 2014;Rajaobelina等,2019)提供了重要貢獻。 基於本研究結果,未來研究可檢視消費者的金融素養(Huston, 2010)、風險感知(Lee & Moghavvemi, 2015)及財務承諾對金融服務參與意願的影響。調查消費者特徵(如金融素養與參與度)(Laurent & Kapferer, 1985)、情境因素(如時間壓力)(Suri & Monroe, 2003)及決策重要性(Chaiken, 1980)的調節作用,將為不同廣告形式與屬性類型的有效性提供全面的認識,揭示感知財務承諾、風險感知等因素如何影響消費者決策,從而制定有效的廣告策略,緩解消費者疑慮,增強對金融服務的信任。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study investigates the impact of credence and search attributes in financial advisor ads on consumer willingness to engage, assessing the influence of presentation formats (text-only vs. pictures with dialogue) and ad credibility. Challenging the common belief that providing more information will always enhance ad effectiveness, no matter its attribute (Emons, 1997; Mitra, 1999), this study proposes that in the context of financial services, the presence of additional information, such as a spokesperson's picture, may have a differential effect on consumer willingness to use ads describing credence and search attributes.
Drawing upon the Elaboration Likelihood Model (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986) and the Cue Diagnosticity Framework (Purohit & Srivastava, 2001), this study hypothesizes that text-only ads describing credence attributes will lead to lower perceived credibility compared to ads describing search attributes (H1). The study also proposes an interaction between ad format and attribute type on perceived credibility (H2), where adding a spokesperson's picture alongside text describing credence attributes will lead to higher perceived credibility (H2A), while adding a spokesperson's picture to text describing search attributes will lead to lower perceived credibility (H2B). The hypotheses were examined in a 2 (attribute type: credence vs. search) x 2 (presentation format: text-only vs. picture with text) experimental design. This thesis analyzed responses from participants recruited through Prolific, who were exposed to one of four versions of an advertisement for the same financial service. The findings, supported by research on ad credibility (Appelman & Sundar, 2016; Kim & Sundar, 2012) and the ELM (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986), suggest that the interaction between attribute type, spokesperson presence, and ad format can significantly influence consumer trust and decision-making in the financial services context. This research addresses a significant gap in the literature by examining the combined effect of attribute type and ad format on perceived credibility and consumer choice likelihood in financial services advertising. While previous studies have investigated credence and search attributes (Darby & Karni, 1973; Emons, 1997) and spokespersons in advertising (Ohanian, 1990; Pornpitakpan, 2004), there is limited research on how these factors interact to influence consumer perceptions and intentions, particularly regarding the moderating role of ad format. The study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of advertising effectiveness in the financial services sector, offering valuable insights for both theory development and practical application. The findings offer valuable managerial insights for financial institutions, highlighting that a spokesperson's picture may not always enhance ad effectiveness and can negatively affect the perceived credibility of ads describing search attributes. By identifying optimal combinations of ad attributes and formats, this study guides the development of targeted marketing strategies that optimize consumer engagement in the financial services sector. The findings contribute to the growing body of literature on financial services advertising (Johnson & Peterson, 2014; Rajaobelina et al., 2019) by examining the interplay between ad content, spokesperson credibility, and presentation format. Building upon these findings, future research could examine the effects of consumer financial literacy (Huston, 2010), perceived risk (Lee & Moghavvemi, 2015), and financial commitment levels on willingness to engage with financial services. Additionally, investigating consumer characteristics and situational factors (Laurent & Kapferer, 1985; Suri & Monroe, 2003; Chaiken, 1980) could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the boundary conditions for different ad formats and attribute types in financial services advertising. This exploration would extend our understanding of how various factors influence consumer decision-making, providing deeper insights into effective advertising strategies. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-11-14T16:06:19Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-11-14T16:06:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgments i
摘要 ii Abstract iv 1. Introduction 1 2. Literature review and hypothesis development 6 2.1 Credence Attribute Goods and Financial Advertisement Services 6 2.2 Ads Format and Presentation 8 2.2.1 Consumer Skepticism, Distraction Cues, and Information Overload 10 2.3 Spokesperson Credibility, Source Credibility, and its Dimensions 14 2.4 Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness 18 2.5 Financial Services Advertising 20 3. Research Gap and Conceptual Framework 25 4. Methodology 31 4.1 Research Design 31 4.2 Sample and Data Collection 36 5. Results 38 5.1 Data Analysis 38 6. Discussion 45 6.1 General Discussion 45 6.2 Implications for Marketers and Managerial Insights 48 6.3 Study Limitation and Future Research Directions 50 7. References 55 8. Appendix 1 59 9. Appendix 2 61 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.title | 當圖像分散注意力時:透過研究屬性類型、代言人存在和廣告格式對感知可信度與消費者行為的影響,優化金融服務廣告效果 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | When Images Distract: Optimizing Advertising Effectiveness in Financial Services by Investigating the Impact of Attribute Type, Spokesperson Presence, and Advertisement Format on Perceived Credibility | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳瑀屏;林嘉薇 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yu-Ping Chen;Chia-Wei Lin | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 信任屬性,搜尋屬性,金融服務廣告,行銷策略,代言人可信度,感知可信度,廣告格式,推敲可能性模型, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Credence Attributes,Search Attributes,Financial services Advertising,Marketing Strategy,Spokesperson's Credibility,Perceived Credibility,Ad Format,Elaboration Likelihood Model, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 62 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202404495 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-10-28 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學系 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 國際企業學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-1.pdf Restricted Access | 938.96 kB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
