請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96087
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 羅竹平 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Chu-Ping Lo | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張華育 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Hua-Yu Chang | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-14T16:08:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-15 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2024-10-14 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2024-09-27 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部分
汪采薇 (2023)。台灣企業永續績效與公司風險及股票流動性(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北大學金融與合作經營學系碩士論文。 官生平 (2023)。ESG績效揭露國際標準現況與發展。品質月刊,59(3),36-46。 林軒誼 (2023)。ESG揭露與股票流動性(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中科技大學流通管理系碩士論文。 張舜芬 (2023)。ESG評等對台灣公開發行公司風險之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學財務管理學系碩士論文。 郭怡萱 (2020)。ESG績效對公司風險之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學財務管理學系碩士論文。 陳彥芳 (2018)。企業社會責任與公司風險之關聯(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學財務金融學系碩士論文。 游琇螢 (2019)。ESG 分數對公司績效表現與風險的影響—以台灣市場為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學財務金融學系碩士論文。 詹場、黃照鈜、邱健嘉、柯文乾 (2021)。強制出具企業社會責任報告書對流動性及風險之影響。會計評論,72,35-79。 蕭莉芃、陳維慈、林灼榮 (2020)。企業社會責任績效對財務風險的影響。臺大管理論叢,30(2),257。 ESG是什麼?ESG怎麼做?與CSR哪裡不同?中小企業導入永續經營5步驟(2024年7月4日)。商業週刊。https://www.businessweekly.com.tw/carbon-reduction/blog/3010720 SDGs一次看懂:聯合國17項永續發展目標內涵是什麼?如何實踐?(2023年3月25日)。ESG 遠見電子報。https://esg.gvm.com.tw/article/24729 TESG永續發展指標介紹 (2021年1月1日)。台灣經濟新報。https://www.tejwin.com/news/tesg-%E6%B0%B8%E7%BA%8C%E7%99%BC%E5%B1%95%E6%8C%87%E6%A8%99%E4%BB%8B%E7%B4%B9/ 台灣經濟新報 (1990年4月)。https://www.tejwin.com/about/ 企業揭露ESG績效,先搞懂GRI、SASB、TCFD國際揭露準則 (2022年5月26日)。ESG 遠見電子報。https://esg.gvm.com.tw/article/5183 二、英文部分 Aljifri, K., & Hussainey, K. (2007). The determinants of forward‐looking information in annual reports of UAE companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(9), 881-894. Amihud, Y. (2002). Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of financial markets, 5(1), 31-56. Anwer, Z., Goodell, J. W., Migliavacca, M., & Paltrinieri, A. (2023). Does ESG impact systemic risk? Evidencing an inverted U-shape relationship for major energy firms. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 216, 10-25.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Bassen, A., & Senkl, D. (2011). ESG-environmental, social, governance issues. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 71(5), 506. Benlemlih, M., & Girerd‐Potin, I. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial risk reduction: On the moderating role of the legal environment. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 44(7-8), 1137-1166. Benlemlih, M., Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2018). Environmental and social disclosures and firm risk. Journal of business ethics, 152, 613-626. Bourveau, T., & Schoenfeld, J. (2017). Shareholder activism and voluntary disclosure. Review of Accounting Studies, 22, 1307-1339. Bouslah, K., Kryzanowski, L., & M’zali, B. (2013). The impact of the dimensions of social performance on firm risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(4), 1258-1273. Brenkert, G. G. (1998). Trust, morality and international business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(2), 293-317. Bruna, M. G., Dang, R., Scotto, M. J., & Ammari, A. (2019). Does board gender diversity affect firm risk-taking? Evidence from the French stock market. Journal of Management and Governance, 23, 915-938. Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of business ethics, 83, 435-451. Diamond, D. W., & Verrecchia, R. E. (1991). Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capital. The journal of Finance, 46(4), 1325-1359. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2004). The capital asset pricing model: Theory and evidence. Journal of economic perspectives, 18(3), 25-46. Feng, S., Zhang, R., & Li, G. (2022). Environmental decentralization, digital finance and green technology innovation. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 61, 70-83. Freeman, R. E., & Phillips, R. A. (2002). Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Business ethics quarterly, 12(3), 331-349. Freudenreich, B., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Schaltegger, S. (2020). A stakeholder theory perspective on business models: Value creation for sustainability. Journal of business ethics, 166(1), 3-18. Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic management journal, 30(4), 425-445. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 1251-1271. Hunjra, A. I., Mehmood, R., & Tayachi, T. (2020). How do corporate social responsibility and corporate governance affect stock price crash risk?. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(2), 30. Jo, H., & Na, H. (2012). Does CSR reduce firm risk? Evidence from controversial industry sectors. Journal of business ethics, 110, 441-456. Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. the Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785-1824. McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of management Journal, 31(4), 854-872. Meckling, W. H., & Jensen, M. C. (1976). Theory of the Firm. Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Plumlee, M., Brown, D., Hayes, R. M., & Marshall, R. S. (2015). Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence. Journal of accounting and public policy, 34(4), 336-361. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard business review, 80(12), 56-68. Qiu, Y., Shaukat, A., & Tharyan, R. (2016). Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. The British Accounting Review, 48(1), 102-116. Ross, S. A. (1978). The current status of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM). The Journal of Finance, 33(3), 885-901. Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jordan, B. D. (2017). Essentials of corporate finance. McGraw-Hill. Sassen, R., Hinze, A. K., & Hardeck, I. (2016). Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Europe. Journal of business economics, 86, 867-904. Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic management journal, 29(6), 569-592. Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic management journal, 29(6), 569-592. Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The journal of finance, 19(3), 425-442. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96087 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 近年來,全球對環境、社會與公司治理(ESG)的重視逐漸提升,許多企業也愈加關注永續發展的議題。本研究旨在探討國內ESG績效評分,以及環境(E)、社會(S)、公司治理(G)各構面的評分對公司風險的影響。其中,公司風險衡量變數分別為總風險、系統性風險、非系統性風險、股票流動性風險,研究對象選取2020年至2023年間我國上市公司。而ESG績效分數取自台灣經濟新報(Taiwan Economic Journal, TEJ),該評分標準是遵循國際SASB準則,並且依照我國產業特性給予永續績效分數。實證結果為ESG揭露績效評分和公司總風險、系統性風險呈現顯著負向關係;在三大因子中,環境和公司治理方面的評分對公司總風險、系統性風險呈現顯著的負相關,顯示企業環境、公司治理績效分數越高,總風險和系統性風險會下降。揭露ESG績效分數使得大眾得以獲得公開透明的非財務資訊,資訊不對等的程度下降,以及企業越積極投入公司治理、改善公司管理及經營結構,兼顧其他利害關係人利益並保障股東權益,將有助於提升公司風險承擔能力。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In recent years, the global emphasis on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) has been steadily increasing, and many companies are becoming more focused on sustainability issues. This study aims to explore the impact of domestic ESG performance scores, as well as the scores of the Environmental (E), Social (S), and Governance (G) dimensions, on corporate risk. The variables used to measure corporate risk include total risk, systematic risk, unsystematic risk, and stock liquidity risk. The research subjects are publicly listed companies in Taiwan from 2020 to 2023. ESG performance scores are sourced from the Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ), with the scoring standards based on international SASB guidelines and adjusted for the characteristics of Taiwanese industries to assign sustainability performance scores. The empirical results show a significant negative relationship between ESG disclosure performance scores and both total risk and systematic risk. Among the three factors, the Environmental and Governance scores exhibit a significant negative correlation with total risk and systematic risk, indicating that higher corporate performance scores in these dimensions lead to a reduction in total risk and systematic risk. Disclosing ESG performance scores allows the public to access transparent non-financial information, reducing the degree of information asymmetry. Furthermore, as companies become more actively involved in corporate governance, improve their management and operational structures, balance the interests of other stakeholders, and protect shareholders' rights, their ability to manage corporate risk is enhanced. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-10-14T16:08:09Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-10-14T16:08:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘 要 ii Abstract iii 目 次 iv 表 次 v 圖 次 vi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 5 第三節 研究架構 5 第二章 文獻回顧 7 第一節ESG相關理論 7 第二節ESG和公司風險 8 第三章 研究設計與方法 17 第一節 樣本資料 17 第二節 變數定義 18 第三節 實證模型 23 第四章 實證結果與分析 25 第一節 敘述性統計 25 第二節 相關性分析 28 第三節 實證結果 31 第五章 結論與建議 45 參考文獻 47 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | ESG績效評分對臺灣上市公司風險的影響之實證分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of ESG Performance Scores on the Risk of Listed Companies in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 113-1 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 雷立芬;許淑媖 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Li-Fen Lei;Su-Ing Hsu | en |
dc.subject.keyword | ESG績效評分,公司總風險,系統性風險,非系統性風險,股票流動性風險, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | ESG Performance Scores,Total Risk,Systematic Risk,Idiosyncratic risk,Stock Liquidity Risk, | en |
dc.relation.page | 50 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202404426 | - |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2024-09-30 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-113-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.06 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。