Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 應用力學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/95892
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor郭茂坤zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorMao-Kuen Kuoen
dc.contributor.author鄧依庭zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorYi-Ting Tengen
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-19T16:14:06Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-20-
dc.date.copyright2024-09-19-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.date.submitted2024-08-06-
dc.identifier.citation[1] J. García-Martín, J. Gómez-Gil, E. Vázquez-Sánchez, “Non- destructive techniques based on eddy current testing,” Sensors 11(3), 2525-2565, 2011.
[2] H. M. Sadek, “NDE technologies for the examination of heat exchangers and boiler tubes - principles, advantages and limitations,” Insight: Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring 48(3), 181-183, 2006.
[3] R. Bogue, “Robots in the nuclear industry: A review of technologies and applications,” Industrial Robot 38(2), 113-118, 2011.
[4] S. Tian, Z. Chen, M. Ueda, T. Yamashita, “Signal processing schemes for eddy current testing of steam generator tubes of nuclear power plants,” Nuclear Engineering and Design 245, 78-88, 2012.
[5] S. Chuang, “Eddy current automatic flaw detection system for heat exchanger tubes in steam generators,” Iowa State University Digital Repository 1997.
[6] A. N. AbdAlla, M. A. Faraj, F. Samsuri, D. Rifai, K. Ali, and Y. Al-Douri, “Challenges in improving the performance of eddy current testing,” Measurement and Control 52(1-2) 46-64, 2019.
[7] G. Van Drunen, V. S. Cecco, “Recognizing limitations in eddy-current testing,” NDT international 17(1), 9-17, 1984.
[8] S. J. Song, Y. K. Shin, “Eddy current flaw characterization in tubes by neural networks and finite element modeling,” NDT and E International 33(4), 233-243, 2000.
[9] L. Rosado, F. Janeiro, P. Ramos, and M. Piedade, “Defect Characterization With Eddy Current Testing Using Nonlinear-Regression Feature Extraction and Artificial Neural Networks,” IEEE Transactions On Instrumentation And Measurement 62(5), 1207-1214, 2013.
[10] B. Helifa, M. Féliachi, I. K. Lefkaier, F. Boubenider, A. Zaoui, and N. Lagraa, “Characterization of surface cracks using eddy current NDT simulation by 3D-FEM and inversion by neural network,” The Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal (ACES) 187-194, 2016.
[11] N. Yusa, E. Machida, L. Janousek, M. Rebican, Z. Chen, and K. Miya, “Application of eddy current inversion technique to the sizing of defects in Inconel welds with rough surfaces,” Nuclear Engineering and Design 235(14), 1469-1480, 2005.
[12] P. Xiang, S. Ramakrishnan, X. Cai, P. Ramuhalli, R. Polikar, S. S. Udpa, L. Udpa, “Automated analysis of rotating probe multi- frequency eddy current data from steam generator tubes,” International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics 12(3-4), 151-164, 2000.
[13] J. Grman, L. Syrova, “Application of recurrent neural network in the field of multifrequency eddy-current testing,” Annals of DAAAM and Proceedings of the International DAAAM Symposium 147-148, 2005.
[14] A. Bernieri, G. Betta, L. Ferrigno, M. Laracca, S. Mastrostefano, “Multifrequency excitation and support vector machine regressor for ECT defect characterization,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 63(5), 1272-1280, 2014.
[15] L. Yin, B. Ye, Z. Zhang, Y. Tao, H. Xu, J. R. S. Avila, and W. Yin, “A novel feature extraction method of eddy current testing for defect detection based on machine learning,” NDT and E International 107, 102108, 2019.
[16] G. D'Angelo, M. Laracca, S. Rampone, and G. Betta, “Fast Eddy Current Testing Defect Classification Using Lissajous Figures,” IEEE Transactions On Instrumentation And Measurement 67(4), 821-830, 2018.
[17] G. D'Angelo, M. Laracca, S. Rampone, “Automated Eddy Current non-destructive testing through low definition lissajous figures,” IEEE Metrology for Aerospace (MetroAeroSpace) 280-285, 2016.
[18] G. D'Angelo, S. Rampone, “Shape-based defect classification for non destructive testing,” IEEE Metrology for Aerospace (MetroAeroSpace) 406-410, 2015.
[19] M. Chelabi, T. Hacib, Y. Le Bihan, N. Ikhlef, H. Boughedda, and M. R. Mekideche, “Eddy current characterization of small cracks using least square support vector machine,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 49(15), 155303, 2016.
[20] Y. Tao, H. Xu, Z. Chen, R. Huang et al, “Automatic feature extraction method for crack detection in eddy current testing,” IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC) 1-6, 2019.
[21] D. J. Pasadas, P. Baskaran, H. G. Ramos, and A. L. Ribeiro, “Detection and classification of defects using ECT and multi-level SVM model,” IEEE Sensors Journal 20(5), 2329-2338, 2019.
[22] M. P. Arenas, T. J. Rocha, C. S. Angani, A. L. Ribeiro, H. G. Ramos, C. B. Eckstein, J. M. A. Rebello, G. R. Pereira, ”Novel austenitic steel ageing classification method using eddy current testing and a support vector machine,” Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation 127, 98-103, 2018.
[23] D. J. Pasadas, H. G. Ramos, B. Feng, P. Baskaran, A. L. Ribeiro, “Defect classification with SVM and wideband excitation in multilayer aluminum plates,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 69(1), 241-248, 2020.
[24] G. Chen, A. Yamaguchi, K. Miya, “A novel signal processing technique for eddy-current testing of steam generator tubes,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 34(3), 642-648, 1998.
[25] H. L. Libby, “Introduction to electromagnetic nondestructive test method,” Wiley-Interscience 258-268, 1971.
[26] Z. Liu, K. Tsukada, K. Hanasaki, M. Kurisu, “Two-dimensional eddy current signal enhancement via multifrequency data fusion,” Research in Nondestructive Evaluation 11(3), 165-177, 1999.
[27] L. Udpa, W. Lord, and S. S. Udpa, “Frequency domain methods for the analysis of multifrequency eddy current data,” NDT and E International 3(30), 181, 1997.
[28] L. A. N. M. Lopez, D. K. S. Ting, and B. R. Upadhyaya, “Removing Eddy-Current probe wobble noise from steam generator tubes testing using Wavelet Transform,” Progress in Nuclear Energy 50(7), 828-835, 2008.
[29] S. Thirunavukkarasu, B. P. C. Rao, T. Jayakumar, and B. Raj, “Techniques for processing remote field eddy current signals from bend regions of steam generator tubes of prototype fast breeder reactor,” Annals of Nuclear Energy 38(4), 817-824, 2011.
[30] S. Oh, G. Choi, D. Lee, M. Choi, and K. Kim, “Analysis of Eddy-Current Probe Signals in Steam Generator U-Bend Tubes Using the Finite Element Method,” Applied Sciences 11(2), 696, 2021.
[31] 陳彥誠, “設備監測及檢測之異常訊號辨識分類,” 長庚大學機械工程學系碩士論文,2021。
[32] 高永浩, “類神經網絡及機器學習應用於渦電流檢測金屬管缺陷訊號分析,” 國立臺灣大學應用力學研究所碩士論文,2022。
[33] OLYMPUS, Internet: https://www.olympus-ims.com/zh/insight/a-faster-way-to-inspect-heat-exchanger-tubes/
[34] Zhu, Jinsong, and Jinbo Song, “An intelligent classification model for surface defects on cement concrete bridges,” Applied Sciences 10(3), 972, 2020.
[35] J. Hansen, “The eddy current inspection method,” Insight 46(5), 279-281, 2004.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/95892-
dc.description.abstract本研究使用機器學習方法,對熱交換管渦電流非破壞檢測之一維訊號進行訊號處理及分析,渦電流檢測設備在單一頻率條件下,在缺陷處可產生阻抗的實部及虛部之兩組訊號變化。研究分為兩個主要部分:實驗和資料分析。實驗部分是收集資料,包括使用雙頻渦電流設備檢測銅鎳和鈦標準管的缺陷渦電流訊號,以及使用四頻設備檢測鈦標準管,以直接獲取四個頻率的缺陷渦電流訊號。本論文使用渦電流差異式探頭之訊號作為研究。
在資料分析部分,由於測量使用的管件每隔若干距離,有外部鐵磁性材料的支撐,這些支撐板會對渦電流訊號,造成非線性的訊號干擾,使檢測人員難以直接判讀訊號的缺陷類型。為解決此問題,本研究應用類神經網路對該訊號進行濾波處理,不僅能消除支撐環的訊號並保留完整的缺陷訊號,還能解決訊號漂移問題。
接著,由濾波後的訊號中,以物理模型所定義的各種特徵進行特徵提取,這些特徵主要從訊號之二維阻抗圖中提取,包括八字圖案的相位角、面積、半徑、寬度等。此外,我們也考慮到並非所有的特徵都是必要的,且某些特徵之間可能因存在高度的相依性,而降低辨別準確度,因此本研究通過單一特徵分類表現及特徵相關圖對各種特徵進行排序,以有效地精簡的特徵數目,達到準確且有效的缺陷評估。然後,將這些特徵輸入隨機森林分類器,對每個缺陷訊號進行學習分類,另外也通過神經網路進一步預測缺陷的深度。
此外,由於支撐環與缺陷重疊的相對位置不同,支撐環對缺陷訊號產生的非線性訊號影響會不同。我們利用少數取得的實際資料,以兩個特徵:缺陷種類和與支撐環相對位置,通過類神經網路學習,以模擬出各種缺陷與對應相對位置的渦電流訊號,該模擬器可做為協助訓練檢測人員判讀缺陷的資料庫。
最後,本研究考慮到未來有新的資料加入時,該模型需要重新學習建立新模型。為了減少重新學習以建立訓練模型之浪費,我們採用增量式學習方法,使其不需在重新完整訓練的情況下,僅採用少部分就資料並加入新資料進行訓練學習,有效學習新資料,更新舊模型。
本研究的主要目的是結合人工智慧與專家系統,使專家能依據原有的物理模型所定義的缺陷特徵,通過機器學習建立缺陷評估系統,以輔助其做更準確且有效地的缺陷判讀。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study uses machine learning methods to process and analyze one-dimensional signals in eddy current non-destructive testing of heat exchanger tubes. Eddy current testing equipment generates two sets of signal changes, the real and imaginary parts of impedance, at defect locations under single-frequency conditions. The research is divided into two main parts: experiments and data analysis. The experimental part involves data collection, including the use of dual-frequency eddy current equipment to detect defect signals in copper-nickel and titanium standard tubes, as well as the use of four-frequency equipment to detect titanium standard tubes, thereby directly obtaining defect eddy current signals at four different frequencies. This study focuses on the signals obtained from eddy current differential probes.
In the data analysis part, the tubes used in the measurements are supported by external ferromagnetic material plates at certain intervals. These support plates cause nonlinear signal interference with the eddy current signals, making it difficult for inspectors to directly identify defect types from the signals. To solve this problem, this study applies neural networks for filtering the signals. This approach not only eliminates the support ring signals and preserves the complete defect signals but also addresses the issue of signal drift.
Next, features defined by physical models are extracted from the filtered signals. These features are mainly derived from the two-dimensional impedance diagram of the signals, including the phase angle, area, radius, and width of the figure-eight pattern. Additionally, we consider that not all features are necessary, and the high interdependence among some features might reduce the accuracy of identification. Therefore, this study ranks the features through single-feature classification performance and feature correlation diagrams to effectively streamline the number of features, achieving accurate and efficient defect assessment. These features are then input into a random forest classifier to classify each defect signal. Moreover, neural networks are used to further predict the depth of defects.
Furthermore, due to the different relative positions of the support rings overlapping with the defects, the nonlinear signal impact of the support rings on the defect signals varies. Using a small amount of actual data, we employ two features—defect type and relative position to the support ring—and use neural networks to simulate the eddy current signals for various defects and their corresponding relative positions. This simulator can serve as a database to assist in training inspectors to interpret defects.
Finally, considering the future addition of new data, the model needs to relearn to establish a new model efficiently. To reduce the waste of retraining, we adopt incremental learning methods, allowing the model to learn new data effectively and update the old model without a complete retraining.
The main objective of this study is to combine artificial intelligence with expert systems, enabling experts to use defect features defined by physical models to establish a defect assessment system through machine learning, thereby assisting in more accurate and efficient defect interpretation.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-09-19T16:14:06Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-09-19T16:14:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii
摘要 iii
Abstract v
目次 viii
圖次 x
表次 xvi
第1章 緒論 1
1.1 前言 1
1.2 研究動機和目的 2
1.3 文獻回顧 3
第2章 渦電流理論與機器學習 5
2.1 熱交換管渦電流檢測概要 5
2.2 機器學習 9
第3章 研究架構與數據及模型建立 15
3.1 研究架構 15
3.2 訊號擷取 18
3.3 數據集建立 21
3.4 ANN濾波模型建立 26
3.5 物理特徵提取 28
3.6 隨機森林分類模型建立 31
3.7 ANN深度預測模型建立 32
3.8 ANN訊號模擬器模型建立 34
第4章 研究結果與討論 36
4.1 ANN訊號濾波結果分析 36
4.2 物理特徵選取 49
4.3 隨機森林分類結果 57
4.4 ANN缺陷深度預測結果分析 61
4.5 ANN 模擬器訊號結果分析 68
4.6 ANN 濾波器與深度預測之增量學習結果分析 75
第5章 結論與未來展望 85
5.1 結論 85
5.2 未來展望 86
參考資料 87
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.title機器學習於熱交換管渦電流缺陷訊號的處理及缺陷分類與預測zh_TW
dc.titleApplication of Machine Learning for Processing, Classification, and Prediction of Defect Signals in Eddy Current Inspection of Heat Exchanger Tubesen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear112-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee藍永強;廖駿偉zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeYung-Chiang Lan;Jiunn-Woei Liawen
dc.subject.keyword熱交換管,渦電流訊號,類神經網絡,濾波,隨機森林分類,缺陷深度預測,增量式學習,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordHeat exchanger tubes,Eddy current signals,Neural networks,Filtering,Random forest classification,Defect depth prediction,Incremental learning,en
dc.relation.page90-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202403610-
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)-
dc.date.accepted2024-08-10-
dc.contributor.author-college工學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept應用力學研究所-
dc.date.embargo-lift2029-08-10-
顯示於系所單位:應用力學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-112-2.pdf
  此日期後於網路公開 2029-08-10
14.19 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved