請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/95885
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 莊裕澤 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Yuh-Jzer Joung | en |
dc.contributor.author | 吳國全 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Kuochuan Wu | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-19T16:11:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-20 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2024-09-19 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2024-08-13 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
一、中文部分 1. 湯明哲,2011,策略精論基礎篇,台北,旗標出版社。 2. 林建煌,2022,消費者行為(7版),台北,華泰文化。 二、英文文獻 1. Grand View Research. 2023. Unified Endpoint Management Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Component (Solution, Services), By Organization Size (SMEs, Large Enterprises), By Vertical, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023 - 2030. Grand View Research. 2. Porter, M. E. 1979. Competitive Strategy. Harvard Business Review. 3. Chandler, A. D. 1962. Strategy and Structure. The MIT Press. 4. Hill, C. W., Jones, G. R., and Schilling, M. A. 1993. Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach: Theory and Cases. Cengage Learning. 5. Drucker, P. F. 1954. The Practice of Management. New York: Harper & Row. 6. Doran, G. T. 1981. There’s a S.M.A.R.T. Way to Write Management’s Goals and Objectives. Management Review, 70, 35-36. 7. Lieberman, Marvin & Montgomery, David. 1988. First-Mover Advantages. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9, 41-58. 8. Mankiw, N. G. 2009. Principles of Microeconomics. Cengage Learning. 9. Grant, R. M. 1991. The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, Vol. 33, 114-135. 10. Amburgey, T. L., and Kelly, D. 1991. Organizational inertia and momentum: A dynamicmodel of Strategic Change. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 591-612. 11. Osterwalder, A., and Pigneur, Y. 2010. Business Model Generation. Self-published. 12. Bock, A. J., and George, G. 2017. The Business Model Book: Design, build and adapt business ideas that thrive. Pearson Education Limited. 13. Zion Market Research. 2021. Unified Endpoint Management Market: Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends and Forecast, 2020-2026. Zion Market Research. 三、網路資料 1. Grand View Research Inc. 2023. Unified Endpoint Management Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Component (Solution, Services), By Organization Size (SMEs, Large Enterprises), By Vertical, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023 – 2030. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/unified-endpoint-management-market. 搜尋日期:2024年1月10日。 2. Cloudflare. 2024. Zero Trust 安全性,https://www.cloudflare.com/zh-tw/learning/security/glossary/what-is-zero-trust/. 搜尋日期:2024年5月4日。 3. Goetzmann, J.-F. 2019. Product Vision, Strategy, Roadmap. https://jefago.medium.com/product-vision-strategy-roadmap-175d638fe93c. 搜尋日期:2024年5月10日。 4. Strategyer AG. 2024. The Value Proposition Canvas. https://www.strategyzer.com/library/the-value-proposition-canvas. 搜尋日期2024年5月11日。 5. Ruddy Lee. 2016. 敏捷開發為何會比較快. https://ruddyblog.wordpress.com/2016/07/21/敏捷開發為何會比較快/. 搜尋日期:2024年5月11日。 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/95885 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究以A公司為例,探討後進者在統一端點管理(UEM)解決方案市場中的進入策略。UEM解決方案能幫助現代企業高效管理並保護日益增多的終端設備,已成為企業數位化轉型的關鍵。然而,該市場目前由微軟、VMware等廠商主導,後進者要在其中突圍並非易事。
本研究運用SWOT、五力模型等工具,深入剖析了A公司所面臨的內外部環境。研究發現,差異化競爭、聚焦細分市場是後進者制勝的關鍵。A公司應立足於自身資源禀賦,在產品功能、服務模式等方面尋求差異化,避免與行業巨頭正面對抗。借助與G公司的戰略合作,A公司可突破資源瓶頸,實現跨越式發展。 同時,本研究還探索了A公司的商業模式。通過梳理其價值主張、目標客戶、核心資源等關鍵要素,研究為A公司在UEM市場立足提供了系統路徑。研究認為,A公司應緊密貼合細分市場需求,提供極致用戶體驗;靈活採用訂閱、客製化等多元商業模式;借助雲端交付與優化系統,降低維運成本和服務差異化。 本研究對後進者在UEM乃至IT管理軟體市場的突圍之道提供了理論分析與實踐指引,對其他處於相似境遇的企業具有一定啟示意義。未來研究可進一步拓展案例維度,深入探索UEM市場的技術革新與商業模式變革,為這一充滿活力的新興領域提供更多學術助力與實踐啟發。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This study examines the entry strategies of latecomers in the Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) solution market, using Company A as an example. UEM solutions help modern enterprises efficiently manage and protect an increasing number of endpoint devices, which has become crucial for digital transformation. However, the market is currently dominated by vendors such as Microsoft and VMware, making it challenging for latecomers to break through.
Using tools such as SWOT analysis and Porter's Five Forces model, this research thoroughly analyzes the internal and external environments faced by Company A. The findings reveal that differentiated competition and focusing on niche markets are key to success for latecomers. Company A should leverage its own resource endowments and seek differentiation in product features and service models, avoiding direct confrontation with industry giants. Through strategic cooperation with Company G, Company A can overcome resource bottlenecks and achieve leapfrog development. Furthermore, this research explores Company A's business model. By examining key elements such as its value proposition, target customers, and core resources, the study provides Company A with a systematic path to establish itself in the UEM market. The research suggests that Company A should closely align with the needs of niche markets, deliver exceptional user experiences, flexibly adopt diverse business models such as subscriptions and customization, and leverage cloud delivery and system optimization to reduce operational costs and differentiate services. This study offers theoretical analysis and practical guidance for latecomers to break through in the UEM and IT management software markets, providing insights for other enterprises facing similar circumstances. Future research can further expand the case dimensions, deeply exploring technological innovation and business model transformation in the UEM market, offering more academic support and practical inspiration for this vibrant emerging field. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-09-19T16:11:57Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-09-19T16:11:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 論文審定書 i
感言與誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii ABSTRACT iv 目次 vi 圖次 viii 表次 x 第一章、 緒論 1 第一節、 研究背景與動機 1 第二節、 研究目的 4 第三節、 研究方法 4 第二章、 文獻探討 6 第一節、 策略規劃程序與競爭策略 6 第二節、 後進者優勢 9 第三節、 商業模式 13 第三章、 產業現況與市場 20 第一節、 統一端點管理解決方案 20 第二節、 統一端點管理技術與功能趨勢 22 第三節、 統一端點管理解決方案市場概況 27 第四節、 統一端點管理解決方案市場五力模型 31 第四章、 個案研究分析與討論 35 第一節、 A公司背景介紹與轉型契機 35 第二節、 UEM市場選擇 40 第三節、 A公司SWOT分析 44 第四節、 A公司作為後進者的優勢分析 48 第五節、 A公司以後進者進入UEM市場之策略規劃 50 第六節、 以商業模式畫布解析A公司進入UEM市場的商業模式 63 第七節、 A公司面臨的挑戰及未來展望 74 第五章、 結論與建議 78 第一節、 研究結論 78 第二節、 研究建議 79 參考文獻 81 一、中文部分 81 二、英文文獻 81 三、網路資料 82 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 統一端點管理解決方案產業之後進者進入策略之研究 — 以A公司為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Entry Strategy of Second Mover in Unified Endpoint Management Solution Industry — A Case Study of A Company | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 郭瑞祥 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | Ruey-Shan Guo | en |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 簡睿哲;黃俊堯;孔令傑 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Ruey-Jer Jean;Chun-Yao Huang;Ling-Chieh Kung | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 統一端點管理,SaaS,五力模型,SWOT分析,商業模式, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Unified Endpoint Management,SaaS,SWOT,Five Force Model,Business Model, | en |
dc.relation.page | 82 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202403567 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-14 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 碩士在職專班資訊管理組 | - |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2027-08-01 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 資訊管理組 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-2.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 6.83 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。