Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 醫學院
  3. 臨床醫學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/95435
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳思原zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorShee-Uan Chenen
dc.contributor.author莊子璇zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorTzu-Hsuan Chuangen
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-06T16:32:24Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-28-
dc.date.copyright2024-09-06-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.date.submitted2024-03-29-
dc.identifier.citationAl Hadithy AFY, Ivanova SA, Pechlivanoglou P, B Wilffert, A Semke, O Fedorenko, E Kornetova, L Ryadovaya, J R B J Brouwers, A J M Loonen
Anderson S, Bankier AT, Barrell BG, de Bruijn MH, Coulson AR, Drouin J, et al. Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome. Nature 1981;290: 457-465.
Bakri N, Ibrahim S, Osman N, Hasan N, Jaffar F, Rahman Z, Osman K. Embryo apoptosis identification: Oocyte grade or cleavage stage? Saudi J Biol Sci. 2016;23:S50-55.
Barnes FL, Victor AR, Zouves CG, Viotti M. Mitochondrial DNA quantitation-making sense of contradictory reports. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:2149-2150.
Bellezza I, Giambanco I, Minelli A, and Donato R. Nrf2-Keap1 signaling in oxidative and reductive stress. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2018;1865:721-733.
Bonomi M, Somigliana E, Cacciatore C, Busnelli M, Rossetti R, Bonetti S, Paffoni A, Mari D, Ragni G, Persani L. Blood Cell Mitochondrial DNA Content and Premature Ovarian Aging. PLoS One 2012;7:e42423.
Bodri D, Kawachiya S, Sugimoto T, Serna JY, Kato R, and Matsumoto T. Time-lapse variables and embryo gender: a retrospective analysis of 81 live births obtained following minimal stimulation and single embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:589-596.
Boucret L, Chao de la Barca JM, Morinière C, Desquiret V, Ferré-L’Hôtellier V, Descamps P, et al. Relationship between diminished ovarian reserve and mitochondrial biogenesis in cumulus cells. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1653–1664.
Chiang JL, Shukla P, Pagidas K, Ahmed NS, Karri S, Gunn DD, Hurd WW, Singh KK. Mitochondria in Ovarian Aging and Reproductive Longevity. Ageing Res Rev. 2020;63:101168.
Chomyn A and Attardi G. MtDNA mutations in aging and apoptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;304:519-529.
Chuang TH, Hsieh JY, Lee MJ, Lai HH, Hsieh CL, Wang HL, Chang YJ, Chen SU. Concordance between different trophectoderm biopsy sites and the inner cell mass of chromosomal composition measured with a next-generation sequencing platform. Mol Hum Reprod. 2018;24:593-601.
Chuang TH, Chang YP, Lee MJ, Wang HL, Lai HH, Chen SU. The incidence of mosaicism for individual chromosomes in human blastocysts is correlated with chromosome length. Front Genet. 2021a;11:565348.
Chuang TH, Wu ZH, Kuan CS, Lee MJ, Hsieh CL, Wang HL, Lai HH, Chang YJ, Chen SU. High concordance in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy between automatic identification via Ion S5 and manual identification via Miseq. Sci Rep. 2021b;11:18931.
Chuang TH, Chen CY, Kuan CS, Lai HH, Hsieh CL, Lee MJ, Liang YT, Chang YJ, Chen CY, Chen SU. Reduced mitochondrial DNA content correlates with poor clinical outcomes in cryotransfers with day 6 single euploid embryos. Front Endocrinol. 2023;13:1066530.
De Boer KA, Jansen RRS, Leigh DA & Mortimer D. Quantification of mtDNA copy number in the human secondary oocyte. Human Reproduction 1999;14:91–92.
Diez-Juan A, Rubio C, Marin C, Martinez S, Al-Asmar N, Riboldi M, Díaz-Gimeno P, Valbuena D, Simón C. Mitochondrial DNA content as a viability score in human euploid embryos: less is better. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:534-541.
Dumollard R, Carroll J, Duchen MR, Campbell K, and Swann K. Mitochondrial function and redox state in mammalian embryos. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2009;20:346-353.
Ebert KM, Liem H, Hecht NB. Mitochondrial DNA in the mouse preimplantation embryo. J Reprod Fertil 1988; 82:145–149.
El-Shourbagy SH, Spikings EC, Freitas M, St John JC. Mitochondria directly influences fertilization outcome in the pig. Reproduction 2006;131:233–245.
Fragouli E, Spath K, Alfarawati S, Kaper F, Craig A, Michel CE, Kokocinski F, Cohen J, Munne S, and Wells D. Altered levels of mitochondrial DNA are associated with female age, aneuploidy, and provide an independent measure of embryonic implantation potential. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005241.
Fragouli E, McCaffrey C, Ravichandran K, Spath K, Grifo JA, Munné S, and Wells D. Clinical implications of mitochondrial DNA quantification on pregnancy outcomes: a blinded prospective non-selection study. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:2340-2347.
Flynn JM and Melov S. SOD2 in Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Neurodegeneration. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013:62:4-12.
Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1999;11:307–311.
Garrido C, Galluzzi L, Brunet M, Puig PE, Didelot C, and Kroemer G. Mechanisms of cytochrome c release from mitochondria. Cell Death Differ. 2006;13:1423-33.
Harvey JA. Mitochondria in early development: linking the microenvironment, metabolism and the epigenome. Reproduction. 2019; 1;157:R159-R179.
Iwata H, Goto H, Tanaka H, Sakaguchi Y, Kimura K, Kuwayama T, Monji Y. Effect of maternal age on mitochondrial DNA copy number, ATP content and IVF outcome of bovine oocytes. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2011;23:424-432.
Kameyama Y, Filion F, Yoo JG, Smith LC. Characterization of mitochondrial replication and transcription control during rat early development in vivo and in vitro. Reproduction 2007;133:423–432.
Kang E, Wu J, Gutierrez NM, Koski A, Tippner-Hedges R, Agaronyan K, Platero-Luengo A, Martinez-Redondo P, Ma H, and Lee Y et al. Mitochondrial replacement in human oocytes carrying pathogenic mitochondrial DNA mutations. Nature. 2016;540:270-275.
Kushnir VA, Ludaway T, Russ RB, Fields EJ, Koczor C, Lewis W. Reproductive aging is associated with decreased mitochondrial abundance and altered structure in murine oocytes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:637–642.
Laborde E. Glutathione transferases as mediators of signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation and cell death. Cell Death Differ. 2010;17:1373-1380.
Lai HH, Chuang TH, Wong LK, Lee MJ, Hsieh CL, Wang HL, Chen SU. Identification of mosaic and segmental aneuploidies by next-generation sequencing in preimplantation genetic screening can improve clinical outcomes compared to array-comparative genomic hybridization. Mol Cytogenet. 2017:10:14. doi: 10.1186/s13039-017-0315-7.
Lai HH, Kuo EE, Li RS, Chuang TH, Huang YC, Hsieh JY, Chang TA, Huang YL, Hsieh WT, Su YR, and Liu M. Using an Interpretable Machine Learning Model to Predict Corifollitropin Alfa Protocol. Fertility & Reproduction. 2023;5:50-60.
Loo G, Saelens X, Gurp M, MacFarlane M, Martin SJ, and Vandenabeele P. The role of mitochondrial factors in apoptosis: a Russian roulette with more than one bullet. Cell Death Differ. 2002;9:1031-1042.
May-Panloup P, Chrétien MF, Jacques C, Vasseur C, Malthièry Y, et al. Low oocyte mitochondrial DNA content in ovarian insufficiency. Hum Reprod 2005;20:593–597.
May-Panloup P, Desquiret V, Morini`ere C, Ferr´e-L’Hˆotellier V, Lemerle S, Boucret L, Lehais S, Chao de la Barca JM, Descamps P, Procaccio V, Reynier P. Mitochondrial macro-haplogroup JT may play a protective role in ovarian aging. Mitochondrion. 2014;18,1–6.
McKenzie D, Bua E, McKiernan S, Cao Z, Aiken JM, and Wanagat J. Mitochondrial DNA deletion mutations: a causal role in sarcopenia. Eur J Biochem. 2002;269:2010-2015.
Motta PM, Nottola SA, Makabe S, and Heyn R. Mitochondrial morphology in human fetal and adult female germ cells. Human Reprod 2000;15:129-147.
Pasquariello R, Ermisch AF, Silva E, McCormick S, Logsdon D, Barfield JP, Schoolcraft WB, Krisher RL. Alterations in oocyte mitochondrial number and function are related to spindle defects and occur with maternal aging in mice and humans. Biol Reprod. 2019;100:971-981.
Poe BG, Navratil M, and Arriaga EA. Absolute quantitation of a heteroplasmic mitochondrial DNA deletion using a multiplex three-primer real-time PCR assay. Anal Biochem. 2007;362:193-200.
Ravichandran K, McCaffrey C, Grifo J, Morales A, Perloe M, Munne S, Wells D, Fragouli E. Mitochondrial DNA quantification as a tool for embryo viability assessment: retrospective analysis of data from single euploid blastocyst transfers. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:1282-1292.
Rodríguez-Nuevo A, Torres-Sanchez A, Duran JM, De Guirior C, Martínez-Zamora MA, and Böke E. Oocytes maintain ROS-free mitochondrial metabolism by suppressing complex I. Nature. 2022;607:756-761.
Ross D and Siegel D. Functions of NQO1 in Cellular Protection and CoQ10 Metabolism and its Potential Role as a Redox Sensitive Molecular Switch. Front Physiol. 2017;8:595. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00595
Ross D and Siegel D. The diverse functionality of NQO1 and its roles in redox control. Redox Biol. 2021:41:101950. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2021.101950.
Santos TA, El Shourbagy S, St. John JC. Mitochondrial content reflects oocyte variability and fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:584–591.
Shibata T, Ohta T, Tong KI, Kokubu A, Odogawa R, Tsuta K, Asamura H, Yamamoto M, and Hirohashi S. Cancer related mutations in NRF2 impair its recognition by Keap1-Cul3 E3 ligase and promote malignancy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008 9;105:13568-13573.
Scott RT, Sun L, Zhan Y, Marin D, Tao X, Seli E. Mitochondrial DNA content is not predictive of reproductive competence in euploid blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;41:183-190.
Shoubridge EA and Wai T. Mitochondrial DNA and the mammalian oocyte. Curr Top Dev Biol 2007;77:87-111.
Singh A, Misra V, Thimmulappa RK, Lee H, Ames S, Hoque MO, Herman JG, Baylin SB, Sidransky D, Gabrielson E, Brock MV, Biswal S. Dysfunctional KEAP1-NRF2 interaction in non-small-cell lung cancer. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030420.
Smits M, Schomakers B, Weeghel M, Wever E, Wüst R, Dijk F, Janssens G, Goddijn M, Mastenbroek S, Houtkooper R, and Hamer G. Human ovarian aging is characterized by oxidative damage and mitochondrial dysfunction. Hum Reprod. 2023;38:2208-2220.
Treff NR, Zhan Y, Tao X, Olcha M, Han M, Rajchel J, et al. Levels of trophectoderm mitochondrial DNA do not predict the reproductive potential of sibling embryos. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:954–962.
Tsai MS, Hwang SM, Chen KD, Lee YS, Hsu LW, Chang YJ, Wang CN, Peng HH, Chang YL, and Chao AS et al. Functional network analysis of the transcriptomes of mesenchymal stem cells derived from amniotic fluid, amniotic membrane, cord blood, and bone marrow. Stem Cells. 2007;25:2511-2523.
Victor AR, Brake AJ, Tyndall JC, Griffin DK, Zouves CG, Barnes FL, and Viotti M. Accurate quantitation of mitochondrial DNA reveals uniform levels in human blastocysts irrespective of ploidy, age, or implantation potential. Fertil Steril 2017;107:34-42.
Victor AR, Griffin DK, Gardner DK, Brake A, Zouves C, Barnes FL, and Viotti M. Births from embryos with highly elevated levels of mitochondrial DNA. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;39:403-412.
Viotti M, Victor AR, Zouves CG, and Barnes FL. Is mitochondrial DNA quantitation in blastocyst trophectoderm cells predictive of developmental competence and outcome in clinical IVF? J Assist Reprod Genet 2017;34:1581-1585.
Wai T, Ao A, Zhang X, Cyr D, Dufort D, Shoubridge EA. The role of mitochondrial DNA copy number in mammalian fertility. Biol Reprod. 2010;83:52-62.
Wang HL, Lai HH, Chuang TH, Shih YW, Huang SC, Lee MJ, Chen SU. A Patient Friendly Corifollitropin Alfa Protocol without Routine Pituitary Suppression in Normal Responders. PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0154123.
Wang J, Shi J, Hui L, Wu D, Jin X, Zhao N, Huang W, Xia Z, Hu G. Association of genetic polymorphisms in CYP2E1, MPO, NQO1, GSTM1, and GSTT1 genes with benzene poisoning. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110:1213-1218.
Wells D, Ravichandran K, McCaffrey C, Grifo J, Morales A, Perloe M, et al. Mitochondrial DNA quantification-the devil in the detail. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:2150–2151.
Wonnapinij P, Chinnery PF, Samuels DC. The distribution of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy due to random genetic drift. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;83:582-593.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/95435-
dc.description.abstract背景說明: 在早期胚胎發育階段,粒線體為細胞重要的能量工廠且呈現明顯的動態變化。而基於胚胎粒線體相關檢測於試管嬰兒療程(IVF)執行的困難度,過去臨床研究主要討論利用胚胎著床前檢測所計算而得的粒線體相對含量於植入胚胎選擇的可行性。然而,早期囊胚滋養層單點切片所得的粒線體含量之於該顆胚胎的意義、與其他胚胎參數的關聯、以及和早期懷孕之間的貢獻度均仍待商榷。因此將粒線體含量應用於選胚實務前,應先針對胚胎粒線體含量和可能之互動因子進行全面分析以確認其角色。

研究設計、規模、持續時間: 本研究共以三階段評估粒線體完整性及其含量應用:初始階段篩選20個不同不孕背景的胚胎用以檢測粒線體DNA(mtDNA)、相關氧化還原基因、凋亡因子細胞色素c (Cytochrome c, Cyt c) 的潛在缺陷或產量變化,因其變動均可能代償性影響粒線體含量。第二階段於NGS程序建立mtDNA比率演算法以計算胚胎切片內相對粒線體含量,並通過分析2,500餘個人類囊胚的滋養層(TE)切片檢體,以評估粒線體含量和各種IVF特徵之間的相互作用,包括和先進的形態動力學參數之關聯。最終階段回溯分析2,283個染色體套數正常的單一囊胚解凍植入(Single euploid embryo cryotransfer, eSET)療程結果,旨在評估粒線體含量對早期懷孕的影響和權重。

參與者/材料、設置、方法: 研究用胚胎檢體依其特定目的分為四群: 粒線體品質測試(n=20)、mtDNA比率演算法的建立(n=150)、粒線體含量與IVF特徵的相關性(n=2,135)、以及粒線體含量對生殖結果的貢獻度(n=2,283)。最初會先對具有各種個體特徵的胚胎進行mtDNA、相關氧化還原基因、粒線體調控細胞凋亡物質Cyt C篩檢,評估以上參數是否和胚胎本質相關聯、進而影響粒線體含量變化;接以建構mtDNA含量演算法並驗證,以確保單點切片所得之粒線體含量的再現性、可靠性和代表性;續用於演算大量檢體的粒線體含量以評估其與胚胎特徵之間的相互作用;最終使用邏輯回歸和機器學習(ML)模型總結粒線體含量在選胚植入中的效益。

主要結果: 粒線體品質相關分析顯示在卵子捐贈者(借卵:年輕健康女性)和IVF族群(自卵:高齡或有其他難孕指標婦女)內、外觀好或不好的胚胎中,mtDNA (4577bp deletion)、氧化還原基因(Nrf2、Keap1、Nqo1)或Cyt c產量均無發現顯著的突變或差異。然而,大規模的粒線體含量與IVF特徵回歸分析顯示,控制多項母體或胚胎參數後粒線體含量與囊胚的時間軸參數具有高度相關性,包含擴張性囊胚的形成天數 (day of expanded blastocyst formation),分群之95%信賴區間(CI): [自卵] -0.55~-0.23、[借卵] -0.49~-0.14,p<0.01; 擴張性囊胚的形成時間 (timing of expanded blastocyst formation) ([95%CI]: -0.24~-0.01,p=0.04); 和胚胎性別 ([95%CI]: 0.24~1.71,p=0.01)。經控制有相互作用的囊胚時間軸因子由邏輯回歸或ML模型評估,粒線體含量對早期懷孕終點影響均不顯著(勝算比,OR: 0.98-1.00; 曲線下面積,AUC差異<0.01,p=0.54)。由此得知影響懷孕的貢獻度主要來自於與粒線體含量有互動的囊胚時間軸因子,而非其本身。

限制: 本研究主要限制於胚胎樣本的不可重複利用與回溯分析本質,致使直接與粒線體品質或功能相關的實驗無法於胚胎本身執行,代以利用胚胎衍生物或胚胎切片放大產物間接替代,因此無法完全排除胚胎切片所經全基因體放大(Whole genome amplification, WGA)衍生的Allele drop-out (ADO)、或來源切片的母源DNA汙染(maternal contamination)之可能性。此外回溯分析主要受資料來源實驗室的內定規範(如切片胚胎等級要求)、電子病歷所載之格式化紀錄等限制,於數據中所產生的偏態分布影響。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractStudy question: To explore the correlation between mitochondrial quantity and the blastocyst developmental potential as well as its contribution to early pregnancy.

What is known already: During the early embryo development, mitochondria, the cellular powerhouse, demonstrates a distinctively kinetic change pattern. Past research primarily focused on the viability of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content for embryo selection, considering its accessibility in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) within IVF programs. Yet, its quantity implications, associations with other biological aspects, and true contribution to early pregnancy remain ambiguous. Therefore, a comprehensive investigation into mitochondrial content of a single trophectoderm biopsy in early-stage blastocyst is imperative before clinical implementation.

Study design, size, duration: Three stages were established to evaluate mitochondrial quantity and its applications. The initial stage involved screening 20 selected embryos to detect potential defects in mtDNA, associated redox genes, and the proapoptotic factor, cytochrome c (Cyt c), encompassing individuals with diverse infertility issues. In the second stage, an mtDNA ratio algorithm to calculate relative mitochondrial content through NGS procedure was established, analyzing a pool of trophectoderm (TE) biopsies over 2,500 embryos to assess interactions between mtDNA quantity and various IVF features, including advanced morphokinetic parameters. The last stage applied 2,283 single euploid blastocyst cryotransfers aimed at demonstrating the impact and significance of mitochondrial quantity on reproductive outcomes.

Participants/Materials, Setting, Methods: The examined embryo cohort was allocated for specific purposes: mitochondrial quality assays (n=20), establishment of relative mtDNA content algorithm (n=150), correlation between mtDNA content and IVF features (n=2,135), and assessment of mitochondrial parameter contribution to reproductive outcomes (n=2,283). Initially, screening for mitochondrial DNA quality and associated redox genetic anomalies was conducted across embryos with various individual characteristics. Subsequent validation of the mitochondrial quantity calculation algorithm ensured the reliability, repeatability, and representativeness of a single TE biopsy. Then the interactions between mtDNA ratios and numerous IVF features were assessed. Finally, the utility of mitochondrial parameters in embryo selection was evaluated using both logistic regression and machine-learning (ML) models.

Main Results: The investigation into mitochondrial quality unveiled no variants or significant alterations in mtDNA (4577 bp deletion), redox genes (Nrf2, Keap1, and Nqo1), or Cyt c across both good and poor embryos derived from either the oocyte donors (a young and healthy population) or IVF cases (women of advanced maternal age and those with other adverse indications). However, mitochondrial quantity (mtDNA ratio) exhibited strong dependence on specific blastocyst timeline factors: the day of expanded blastocyst formation ([95% Confidence intervals, CI] self oocyte: from -0.55 to -0.23; oocyte donors: from -0.49 to -0.14, p<0.01), timing of expanded blastocyst formation ([95% CI] from -0.24 to -0.01, p=0.04), and gender of embryo ([95% CI] from 0.24, to 1.71, p=0.01). Despite these interactions, the mtDNA ratio did not notably impact reproductive outcomes, as assessed by logistic regression (Odds ratio, OR: 0.98~1.00) or ML models (Area under curve, AUC: improvement <0.01, p=0.54). Therefore, factors contributing to embryo competence and successful pregnancy appear to be primarily linked to time-dependent blastocyst variables rather than mitochondrial quantity.

Limitation, reasons for caution: The primary limitations of present study lie in the sample availability and the retrospective nature. Assessing mitochondrial quality faces constraints in direct function evaluation due to embryo feasibility. Therefore, fundamental bias of allele drop-out (ADO) or possible maternal contamination during the whole genome amplification (WGA) in the NGS procedure cannot be completely excluded. Additional influence to the data analysis could be derived from the precondition for biopsied embryos at the operation laboratory and the formatted electronic medical records.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-09-06T16:32:24Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-09-06T16:32:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontentsAcknowledgment 2
中文摘要 3
Abstract 6
List of content 9
List of figures 12
List of tables 13
1. Introduction 14
1.1 Mitochondria in germline 14
1.2 Mitochondria dysfunction in reproduction 15
1.3 Application of mtDNA content in IVF 16
1.4 Controversy in application of mtDNA content 17
2. Aims and rationale 19
3. Study design 19
3.1 Assessment of mitochondrial quality 19
3.2 Assessment of mitochondrial quantity 20
3.3 Stationary features and mtDNA ratio 21
3.4 Morphokinetic features and mtDNA ratio 21
3.5 Embryo selection and mitochondrial parameters 22
4. Materials and methods 23
4.1 Assessment of mitochondria quality 23
4.1.1 Evaluation of mutations in mtDNA and related redox genes 23
4.1.2 Cytochrome c assay for spent media 24
4.2 Assessment of mitochondria quantity 26
4.2.1 Approach of NGS (Pipeline for ploidy and mtDNA ratio) 26
4.2.2 Reproducibility 29
4.2.3 Repeatability 30
4.2.4 Reliability 31
4.2.5 Representativeness: Intra-embryo validation 32
4.2.6 Representativeness: Embryo-environment validation 33
4.3 Association of IVF features and mtDNA ratio 34
4.3.1 Study subjects for IVF features 34
4.3.2 Variables derived from COS 35
4.3.3 Embryonic variables derived from IVF culture 36
4.4 Association of reproductive outcomes and mtDNA ratio 37
4.4.1 Study subjects of eSET 37
4.4.2 Maternal variables derived from FET 38
4.4.3 Embryonic variables for selection 38
4.5 Statistical method for associate analysis 39
4.6 Machine learning method for priority weighting 39
5. Results 41
5.1 Assessment of mitochondria quality 41
5.1.1 Sequence of related redox genes 41
5.1.2 Gel electrophoresis of mtDNA4577 42
5.1.3 Cytochrome c of spent culture media 43
5.2 Assessment of mitochondria quantity 44
5.2.1 Pipeline for ploidy and mtDNA ratio 44
5.2.2 Reproducibility of established mtDNA ratio pipeline 45
5.2.3 Repeatability of mtDNA ratio using cell lines 46
5.2.4 Reliability of mtDNA ratio using qPCR 46
5.2.5 Representativeness of mtDNA ratio from a single biopsy 47
5.2.6 Representativeness of mtDNA ratio from spent media 47
5.3 Association IVF features and mtDNA ratio 48
5.3.1 Description of maternal features by population 48
5.3.2 Description of maternal features by quartiles of mtDNA ratio 49
5.3.3 Association of maternal features and mtDNA ratio 49
5.3.4 Description of stationary IVF features by quartiles of mtDNA ratio 50
5.3.5 Association of stationary IVF features and mtDNA ratio 51
5.3.6 Description of the embryo cultured in the time-lapse system 52
5.3.7 Association of morphokinetic features and mtDNA ratio 53
5.4 Association of mtDNA ratio and final reproductive outcomes 54
5.4.1 Description of Maternal and embryo features derived from eSET 54
5.4.2 Association of mtDNA ratio and reproductive endpoints 55
5.4.3 Weighting of mtDNA ratio in early pregnancy 56
6. Discussion 57
6.1 Mitochondria quality and early-stage embryos 57
6.2 Mitochondria quantity and early-stage embryos 60
6.3 Applicability of mitochondrial parameters in embryo selection 64
6.4 Limitations 66
7. Conclusions 66
8. Funding 67
9. Reference 68
10. Figures 76
11. Tables 112
12. List of Abbreviation 135
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject擴張性囊胚形成天數zh_TW
dc.subject擴張性囊胚的形成時間zh_TW
dc.subject粒線體zh_TW
dc.subject胚胎著床前染色體非整倍性篩檢zh_TW
dc.subject次世代定序zh_TW
dc.subject胚胎形態動力學zh_TW
dc.subjectNext-generation sequencing (NGS)en
dc.subjectMitochondriaen
dc.subjectDay of expanded blastocyst formationen
dc.subjectEmbryo morphokineticsen
dc.subjectPreimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A)en
dc.title試管嬰兒療程中粒線體含量與胚胎潛能之相關性zh_TW
dc.titleAssociation of mitochondrial quantity and embryo competence in in-vitro fertilization programen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear112-2-
dc.description.degree博士-
dc.contributor.coadvisor陳倩瑜zh_TW
dc.contributor.coadvisorChien-Yu Chenen
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee王弘毅;林亮音;黃泓淵;陳啟煌zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeHung-Yi Wang;Liang-In Lin;Hong-Yuan Huang;Chi-Huang Chenen
dc.subject.keyword粒線體,擴張性囊胚形成天數,擴張性囊胚的形成時間,胚胎形態動力學,胚胎著床前染色體非整倍性篩檢,次世代定序,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordMitochondria,Day of expanded blastocyst formation,Embryo morphokinetics,Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A),Next-generation sequencing (NGS),en
dc.relation.page136-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202400824-
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)-
dc.date.accepted2024-04-01-
dc.contributor.author-college醫學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept臨床醫學研究所-
dc.date.embargo-lift2029-03-28-
顯示於系所單位:臨床醫學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-112-2.pdf
  未授權公開取用
4.59 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved