請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/95204完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 荷世平 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Shih-Ping Ho | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃逸嫺 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | YI-Hsien Huang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-30T16:10:26Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-31 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-08-30 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-08-07 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
1. CSRone永續報告平台、政治大學信義書院、資誠聯合會計師事務所(2017)。2017 台灣永續報告現況與趨勢。 2. CSRone永續報告平台、政治大學信義書院、資誠聯合會計師事務所(2018)。2018 台灣永續報告現況與趨勢。 3. 蔡進錩(2022).木工刀具產業競爭策略之研究 –以A公司為例,東海大學高階經營碩士在職專班 碩士學位論文 4. 郭孟芸(2023) 整合氣候法制與企業ESG能源與碳排放績效評量制度-研析臺灣因應氣候變遷策略,國立台灣大學環工所 博士學位論文 5. 李擇明(2022)企業永續發展策略探討—以台達電子為例,國立臺灣大學管理學院商學研究所 碩士學位論文 6. 王筑卉(2022) ESG中環境面的揭露與績效對於銀行借款成本之影響,國立中山大學金融創新產業研究專班 碩士學位論文 7. 林芝后 (2009). 企業社會責任之略類型與分析. 國立臺灣大學管理學院商學研究所 碩士學位論文 8. 張聰捷等人(2018) 木工機械產業發展策略研究,管理學術研討會, 第十六屆, 2018 9. 台灣機械工業同業公會 (2024, February 27). 台灣機械產業發展白皮書. 10. 熊治民(2023)臺灣機械產業面對淨零排放趨勢的新成長機會,機械工業478期雷射應用與數位轉型技術專輯 11. 黃慕凱等人(2023). 製造業的淨零碳排數位轉型路徑,機械工業479期機械工業技術與產業資訊專輯 12. 國家發展委員會 (2022). 台灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明. 13. 國家發展委員會 (2022). 台灣淨零「12項關鍵戰略行動計畫」. 14. 國家發展委員會 (2022). 「淨零排放路徑112-115年綱要計畫」. 15. 環境部 (2023, November). 國家因應氣候變遷行動綱領. 16. 金管會 (2022). 上市櫃公司永續發展路徑圖. 17. 金管會 (2023). 上市櫃公司永續發展行動方案. 18. 金管會 (2023). 我國接軌IFRS永續揭露準則藍圖. 19. 上市上櫃公司治理實務守則 (2022). 20. 上市上櫃公司永續發展實務守則 (2022). 21. 申永順 (2017). 國際 CSR 發展典範轉移. 財團法人台灣永續能源研究基金會,2017 企業永續菁英培訓班(12/13 場次)課程簡報, P66. 22. 社團法人中華民國企業永續發展協會. (2015). 永續發展目標CEO指南. Retrieved from http://www.bcsd.org.tw/sites/default/files/node/news/1490.upload.5414.pdf (accessed on 2018/1/18). 23. 台灣工具機暨零組件工業同業公會. (2022, October 17). 工具機產業因應減碳永續經營參考手冊. 24. Financial Supervisory Commission, R.O.C. (Taiwan). (2023, August 17). 我國接軌IFRS永續揭露準則藍圖. https://www.sfb.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=95&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=multimessage_view.jsp&dataserno=202308170002&dtable=News English references 1. Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. (2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management PerspectivesVol. 22, No. 4 2. Baolong, Y. (2022). Do corporate social responsibility practices contribute to green innovation? The mediating role of green dynamic capability. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Vol. 61, No. 11, November 2015, pp. 2549–2568 3. Business & Sustainable Development Commission (BSDC). (2017). Better business, better world. Retrieved from http://report.businesscommission.org/uploads/Chinese.pdf 4. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons /July-August 1991 5. Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. BUSINESS & SOCIETY, Vol. 38 No. 3, September 1999 268-295 6. Carroll, A. B. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research, and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews (2010) 7. Carroll, A. B. (2016). Carroll's pyramid of CSR: Taking another look. International Journal of Management Reviews (2010) 8. Elkington, J. (1999). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone Publishing. 9. Chakravorti, B. (2017, March 14). How companies can champion sustainable development. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2017/03/how-companies-can-champion-sustainable-development 10. Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY VOL. 54, NO. 1 11. Derwall, J., Guenster, N., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K. (2005). The eco-efficiency premium puzzle. Financial Analysts Journal, 61:2, 51-63, 12. Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? 76 / CALI FOR N JAM A NAG EMEN T REVlEW 13. Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate susainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130-141. 14. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Vol. 60, No. 11, November 2014, pp. 2835–2857 15. Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Vol. 61, No. 11, November 2015, pp. 2549–2568 16. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 2015 Vol. 5, No. 4, 210–233 17. Global Reporting Institution, UN Global Compact, and World Business Council for Sustainable Development (GRI). (2016). SDG Compass. Retrieved from https://sdgcompass.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/SDG_Compass_Guide_Chinese.pdf 18. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural resource-based view of the firm. 19. Roger A. Kerin etl (1995). First - Mover advantage: A Synthesis, Conceptual Framework, and Research Propositions. Journal of Marketing Vol. 56 (October 19921. 33-52 20. Richard Makadok (1998). Can First-Mover and Early-mover advantages be sustained in an industry with low barrier to entry/ imitation? Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19, 683–696 (1998) 21. Riccardo Vecchiato (2015). Creating value through foresight: First-mover advantage and strategic agility. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 101 (2015) 25–36 22. Jim Andersen (2021). A rational natural-resource-based view on product innovation: The influence of green product innovation and green suppliers on differentiation advantage in small manufacture firms. Technovation 104 (2021) 23. Swen Nadkarni (2021). Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research. Management Review Quarterly (2021) 71:233–341 24. Industrial Machinery and Goods- Sustainability Accounting Standard (SASB version 2023.12). 25. King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2001). Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology Volume 5, Number 1 26. Mann, M., Byun, S.-E., & Li, Y. (2015). Realignment strategies in the US retail industry during a recessionary time: Dominant themes, trends, and propositions. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 43(8), 775-792. 27. Parguel, B., Benoît-Moreau, F., & Larceneux, F. (2011). How sustainability ratings might deter 'greenwashing': A closer look at ethical corporate communication. J Bus Ethics (2011) 102:15–28 28. PWC’s Global Investor Survey (Oct. 28, 2021). 29. Sustainable Development Goals Fund (SDGF). (2016). Universality and the SDGs: A business perspective. Retrieved from https://www.sdgfund.org/sites/default/files/Report-Universality-and-the-SDGs.pdf 30. The European Green Deal. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52019DC0640 31. The European Machine Tool Sector and the Circular Economy (2019 CECIMO). 32. Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (2023). 2023 Status Report. 33. Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Harper & Row. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/95204 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 台灣政府於2021年宣布「台灣2050淨零轉型」施政總目標後,減少碳排放與永續議題迅速成為各界關注焦點。大型企業如科技業、金融業已積極應對,但傳統中小企業在資金、規模與人才方面存在諸多挑戰,對永續策略與減碳作為的認識與實踐仍不充分。本文旨在系統地研究並分析國際及台灣永續發展趨勢,提供台灣木工機械業者參考指南,並分析探討採取積極永續作為的木工機械業者是否可透過永續策略建構企業優勢策略。
研究目的包括分析國際永續發展趨勢、台灣政府永續發展目標與產業關係、台灣機械產業永續策略與減碳作為,及透過優勢策略理論分析採取積極永續木工機械業永續發展策略與減碳作為。本研究方法包括文獻回顧、專家訪談及個案研究,探討木工機械業在國際規約及台灣政策引導下的現況。 研究結果顯示,國際及台灣永續發展趨勢對木工機械業者具有重要指引意義。以資源基礎觀點理論、動態能力理論及先進者優勢競爭策略理論分析,企業善用內外部資源以構建低碳永續轉型可以建立綠色競爭優勢。木工機械業者可透過積極參與國際永續倡議,採取科學基礎的減碳目標及策略,提升能源效率,並結合供應鏈管理與綠色創新,達成永續發展與競爭力提升的雙重目標。 研究指出,台灣木工機械業可通過綠色創新與永續策略提升競爭優勢,並建議政府在政策制定上進一步支持中小企業的永續轉型,提供技術與資金支持,以實現2050淨零轉型目標。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | After Taiwan government announced the "Taiwan 2050 Net Zero Transition" policy goal in 2021, reducing carbon emissions and sustainability issues rapidly became focal points of attention across various sectors. Large enterprises such as those in the technology and financial industries have actively responded, but traditional small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face numerous challenges in terms of funds, scale, and talent. Their understanding and implementation of sustainability strategies and carbon reduction measures remain insufficient. This paper aims to systematically study and analyze international and Taiwanese sustainability development trends, providing a reference guide for Taiwanese woodworking machinery industry players. This paper examines whether those who take active sustainable measures can build competitive advantages through sustainability practices.
The research objectives include analyzing international sustainability development trends, the relationship between Taiwanese government sustainability goals and the industry, sustainability strategies and carbon reduction measures in Taiwan's machinery industry, and analyzing the sustainability development strategies and carbon reduction measures of the woodworking machinery industry through the lens of competitive advantage theory. The research methods include literature review, expert interviews, and case studies to explore the current status of the woodworking machinery industry under the guidance of international regulations and Taiwanese policies. The research results show that international and Taiwanese sustainability development trends provide important guidance for woodworking machinery industry players. Enterprises may utilize resource-based view theory, dynamic capabilities theory, and first-mover advantage theory, combining internal and external resources to build competitive advantages on low-carbon transformation. Woodworking machinery industry players can actively participate in international sustainability initiatives, adopt scientifically-based carbon reduction targets and strategies, improve energy efficiency, and integrate supply chain management with green innovation to achieve the dual goals of sustainable development and enhanced competitiveness. The study shows that Taiwan's woodworking machinery industry can enhance competitive advantage through green innovation and sustainability strategies. It suggests that the government should further support SMEs' sustainable transition through policy-making, providing technical and financial support to achieve the 2050 net zero transition goal. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-30T16:10:26Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-30T16:10:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 次
誌 謝 i 中文摘要 ii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節、研究背景與動機 1 第二節、研究目的 2 第三節、研究方法與流程 3 第二章、文獻回顧 4 第一節、企業永續發展的理念與價值實現 4 一、企業永續概念之發展歷程 4 二、企業永續發展模式 6 三、企業社會責任與公司價值之關係 8 第二節、企業競爭策略理論 10 一、資源基礎觀點理論(Resource-Based View, RBV) 10 二、動態能力理論(Dynamic capabilities Theory) 10 三、先進者優勢理論(First Mover advantage Theory) 11 小結 13 第三章、國際永續發展現況與趨勢分析 15 第一節、國際公約演進 15 小結 18 第二節、全球 ESG 倡議組織與 ESG 評鑑機構 20 一、氣候議題相關倡議 20 二、投資人主導相關倡議 21 三、減碳相關倡議 21 四、機械設備業相關倡議 22 五、ESG 國際評比 23 第三節、國際永續報告準則 25 一、GRI(Global Reporting Initiative)準則 26 二、 SASB (Sustainability Accounting Standards Board)準則 27 三、 TCFD 準則 27 四、 CDSB Framework Application Guidance準則 28 五、ESRS報導準則 29 六、CBAM 歐盟碳邊境關稅 30 七、IFRS S1及S2 30 第四節、台灣永續發展策略趨勢 32 一、臺灣永續發展目標 32 二、上市櫃公司永續發展行動方案 33 三、 接軌IFRS永續揭露準則藍圖 35 四、台灣2050淨零轉型策略 36 五、2050台灣淨零排放路徑規劃 37 第五節、台灣製造業2050淨零戰略與路徑規劃藍圖 39 一、台灣製造業2050淨零戰略 39 二、台灣製造業2050淨零路徑規劃藍圖 40 第四章、台灣木工機械產業概況 41 第一節、台灣木工機械產業發展歷程 41 第二節、木工機械產業現況分析 43 第三節、台灣木工機械產業與永續發展 45 第五章、台灣木工機械業永續策略與減碳作為個案分析 49 第一節、木工機械業永續態勢綜觀 49 第二節、木工機械業永續實務發展分析 53 一、群聚效應未影響從事ESG 53 二、永續業務與企業經營型態關聯性低 53 三、木工機械產業國際化深 54 四、低碳轉型成本難以快速回收 55 五、自有品牌與代工廠在永續執行之差異 56 六、資本額與從事永續作為關聯性大 56 七、企業重視榮譽程度與ESG投入程度成正比 56 八、積極從事永續獲利反而較好 57 小結 58 第三節、採積極永續策略之個案公司探討 59 一、A公司之永續策略與減碳作為與SDGs及GRI之關聯性 59 二、B公司之永續策略與減碳作為與SDGs及GRI之關聯性 62 三、C公司之永續策略與減碳作為與SDGs及GRI之關聯性 64 第四節、採積極永續策略之個案公司競爭優勢之探討 69 一、以資源基礎觀點理論分析 69 二、以動態能力理論分析 72 三、以先進者優勢理論分析 73 第五節、採積極永續策略之個案公司綜合策略意涵 76 第六章、結論與建議 77 第一節、結論 77 第二節、後續研究建議 79 參考文獻 80 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 永續 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 減碳 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 產業永續轉型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 競爭策略 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 淨零 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Sustainability | en |
| dc.subject | Net Zero | en |
| dc.subject | Carbon Reduction | en |
| dc.subject | Industry Sustainable Transformation | en |
| dc.subject | Competitive Strategy | en |
| dc.title | 台灣木工機械業永續優勢策略探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study on Sustainability Advantage Strategies of Taiwan Woodworking Machinery Industry | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林正芳;許耀文 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Cheng-Fang Lin;Yau-wen Shiu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 永續,競爭策略,產業永續轉型,減碳,淨零, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Sustainability,Competitive Strategy,Industry Sustainable Transformation,Carbon Reduction,Net Zero, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 84 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202403016 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-09 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2029-08-01 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf 此日期後於網路公開 2029-08-01 | 4.57 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
