請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/95070完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳沛隆 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Pei-Lung Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳韻如 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yun-Ru Chen | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-27T16:13:23Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-28 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-08-27 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-08-06 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1.Northrup, H., et al., Tuberous Sclerosis Complex, in GeneReviews((R)), M.P. Adam, et al., Editors. 1993: Seattle (WA).
2.Sancak, O., et al., Mutational analysis of the TSC1 and TSC2 genes in a diagnostic setting: genotype--phenotype correlations and comparison of diagnostic DNA techniques in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex. Eur J Hum Genet, 2005. 13(6): p. 731-41. 3.Northrup, H., et al., Updated International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Diagnostic Criteria and Surveillance and Management Recommendations. Pediatr Neurol, 2021. 123: p. 50-66. 4.Hong, C.H., et al., An estimation of the incidence of tuberous sclerosis complex in a nationwide retrospective cohort study (1997-2010). Br J Dermatol, 2016. 174(6): p. 1282-9. 5.Jozwiak, S., et al., Usefulness of diagnostic criteria of tuberous sclerosis complex in pediatric patients. J Child Neurol, 2000. 15(10): p. 652-9. 6.Miloloza, A., et al., The TSC1 gene product, hamartin, negatively regulates cell proliferation. Hum Mol Genet, 2000. 9(12): p. 1721-7. 7.Luo, C., et al., Perfect match: mTOR inhibitors and tuberous sclerosis complex. Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2022. 17(1): p. 106. 8.Reyna-Fabian, M.E., et al., First comprehensive TSC1/TSC2 mutational analysis in Mexican patients with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex reveals numerous novel pathogenic variants. Sci Rep, 2020. 10(1): p. 6589. 9.Northrup, H., D.A. Krueger, and G. International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus, Tuberous sclerosis complex diagnostic criteria update: recommendations of the 2012 Iinternational Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Conference. Pediatr Neurol, 2013. 49(4): p. 243-54. 10.Richards, S., et al., Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med, 2015. 17(5): p. 405-24. 11.Tyburczy, M.E., et al., Mosaic and Intronic Mutations in TSC1/TSC2 Explain the Majority of TSC Patients with No Mutation Identified by Conventional Testing. PLoS Genet, 2015. 11(11): p. e1005637. 12.Ye, Z., et al., Mosaicism in tuberous sclerosis complex: Lowering the threshold for clinical reporting. Hum Mutat, 2022. 43(12): p. 1956-1969. 13.Julie Loft Nagel, M.P.S., Lisbeth Birk Møller, Lotte Andreasen, Anette Bygum, Mosaicism in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: A Case Report, Literature Review, and Original Data from Danish Hospitals. European Medical Journal Dermatology, 2021(9(1)): p. 98-105. 14.Klonowska, K., et al., Comprehensive genetic and phenotype analysis of 95 individuals with mosaic tuberous sclerosis complex. Am J Hum Genet, 2023. 110(6): p. 979-988. 15.Graffigna, G., C. Bosio, and I. Cecchini, Assisting a child with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC): a qualitative deep analysis of parents' experience and caring needs. BMJ Open, 2013. 3(12): p. e003707. 16.Hironaka, L.K. and M.K. Paasche-Orlow, The implications of health literacy on patient-provider communication. Arch Dis Child, 2008. 93(5): p. 428-32. 17.Samia, P., et al., Parental Understanding of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex. J Child Neurol, 2015. 30(10): p. 1281-6. 18.Kopp, C.M., et al., Behavior problems in children with tuberous sclerosis complex and parental stress. Epilepsy Behav, 2008. 13(3): p. 505-10. 19.Both, P., et al., Tuberous sclerosis complex: Concerns and needs of patients and parents from the transitional period to adulthood. Epilepsy Behav, 2018. 83: p. 13-21. 20.Anderson, M., E.J. Elliott, and Y.A. Zurynski, Australian families living with rare disease: experiences of diagnosis, health services use and needs for psychosocial support. Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2013. 8: p. 22. 21.Cockerell, I., et al., Renal manifestations of tuberous sclerosis complex: patients' and parents' knowledge and routines for renal follow-up - a questionnaire study. BMC Nephrol, 2018. 19(1): p. 39. 22.李昭萱, 結節硬化症: REDCap 資料庫的建立以及次世代定序基因檢測. 臺灣大學分子醫學研究所學位論文, 2018. 2018: p. 1-92. 23.MutationMapper. 2024/07/03; Available from: https://www.cbioportal.org/mutation_mapper. 24.Litzkendorf, S., et al., Use and importance of different information sources among patients with rare diseases and their relatives over time: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 2020. 20(1): p. 860. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/95070 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 結節性硬化症為罕見的單一基因異常體染色體顯性遺傳疾病,目前已知是由 TSC1 或 TSC2 基因致病變異導致,造成mTOR 路徑的抑制作用喪失,使細胞過度活化而在多個器官中形成錯構瘤(hamartoma)。依錯構瘤生長的位置不同導致患者會出現多樣的臨床表徵。目前臨床上診斷結節性硬化症患者的方式,除了臨床表徵診斷外,也同時利用基因檢測方式採取患者的周邊血液檢體進行次世代定序。然而,仍有少數臨床診斷為結節性硬化症的患者其基因檢測卻無明顯確診之證據。可能的原因包含:檢測的技術方法、剪接位點變異在較深的內含子、或是患者存在低比例鑲嵌型致病變異等,都是潛在影響確診結節性硬化症的因素。隨著時間推移、基因檢測技術的發展或是對變異位點有新的註解,TSC1 或 TSC2 基因中新的致病性變異仍在不斷被發現,並導入臨床診斷。本研究將過去臨床確診結節性硬化症的患者之基因檢測重新再分析。利用比較LOVD和ClinVar國際資料庫與使用人工智慧平台GenDiseak協助分析,並依據ACMG guideline綜合判讀之策略,試圖為個案找出致病性變異。
本研究發現在基因檢測的判讀上,目前尚無法僅依賴單一個資料庫來做參考,仍需綜合參考其他資料庫以進行判讀;搭配資料庫重新分析55位TSC個案過去之基因檢測,發現有7位(13%)個案有提升一級判讀等級,顯示重新分析過去的基因檢測結果仍有其必要性。然而經由MPSA的分析方法,有機會透過高通量分析的方式,驗證variant是否會影響剪接,以協助提高變異位點被辨識的機會,針對發現的變異位點,設計minigene功能性測試系統來確認此剪接位變異位點,將繼續進行驗證。此外鑲嵌型患者血液及唾液兩種不同組織樣本中鑲嵌比例無顯著差異。 除了基因檢測的探討外,在臨床照護端製作疾病照護手冊,為TSC個案和家屬提供疾病相關之醫療與生活照護的參考資訊,讓患者能夠更瞭解與管理自己的疾病,進而減少醫病壓力並提高照護品質。本研究綜合科學基礎研究與臨床資訊蒐集分析,希望未來能對結節性硬化症的理解與治療提供新見解。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a rare autosomal dominant genetic disorder caused by mutations in the TSC1 or TSC2 genes. These mutations lead to a loss of inhibition in the mTOR pathway, resulting in overactivation of cells and the formation of hamartomas in multiple organs. Depending on the location of these hamartomas, patients can exhibit a wide range of clinical manifestations. Clinically, TSC is diagnosed not only through the identification of clinical symptoms but also through genetic testing using next-generation sequencing of peripheral blood samples. However, there are still a few patients clinically diagnosed with TSC who do not have clear evidence from genetic testing. Potential reasons for this include the technical methods used in testing, splicing site mutations in deep introns, or the presence of low-percentage mosaic pathogenic mutations, all of which can affect the diagnosis of TSC. Over time, as genetic testing techniques advance and new annotations of mutation sites are made, novel pathogenic variants in the TSC1 or TSC2 genes continue to be discovered and integrated into clinical diagnoses. This study aims to reanalyze the genetic testing results of patients previously clinically diagnosed with TSC. By comparing data from international databases LOVD and ClinVar and using the artificial intelligence platform GenDiseak for analysis, we seek to identify pathogenic variants according to the ACMG guidelines.
This study found that in the interpretation of genetic testing, it is currently not feasible to rely on a single database alone; instead, a comprehensive reference to multiple databases is required. By reanalyzing past genetic tests of 55 TSC cases with updated databases, we found that 7 cases (13%) had an upgraded interpretation classification, highlighting the importance of reanalyzing previous genetic test results. However, through the MPSA analysis method, there is an opportunity to validate whether variants affect splicing via high-throughput analysis, thereby improving the chances of identifying variant sites. For the detected variant sites, a minigene functional test system will be designed to confirm these splicing variant sites and further validation will continue. Additionally, there is no significant difference in the mosaicism proportion between blood and saliva samples in mosaic individuals. In addition to exploring genetic testing, we have created a disease care manual for clinical care to provide TSC patients and their families with medical and lifestyle care information. This aims to help patients better understand and manage their condition, thereby reducing stress and improving the quality of care. This study integrates basic scientific research with the collection and analysis of clinical information, aiming to provide new insights into the understanding and treatment of tuberous sclerosis in the future. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-27T16:13:23Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-27T16:13:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘要 ii ABSTRACT iv 圖 次 ix 表 次 xi 第一章 研究背景與動機 1 1.1 結節性硬化症流行病學 1 1.2 結節性硬化症的致病機轉 1 1.3 結節性硬化症的診斷標準 2 1.3.1 臨床診斷標準 2 1.3.2 基因診斷標準 4 1.4 結節性硬化症現有資料庫 5 1.4.1 萊頓開放變異資料庫(LOVD) 5 1.4.2 ClinVar 資料庫 5 1.4.3 REDCap 資料庫 - NTUH 6 1.5 研究目的 6 第二章 研究方法 10 2.1 研究對象 10 2.1.1 受試者來源 10 2.1.2 受試者檢體來源與收案篩選標準 10 2.2 研究方法 11 2.2.1 受試者 DNA 萃取 11 2.2.2 偵測 DNA 品質 12 2.2.3 次世代定序(Next-Generation Sequencing, NGS) 12 2.2.4 聚合酶連鎖反應(PCR)及傳統定序(sanger sequencing) 14 2.2.5 Minigene assay 14 2.2.6 變異位點致病性的判讀準則 15 2.3 個案基因檢測資料分析 16 2.3.1 比較 LOVD 與 ClinVar 資料庫 16 2.3.2 臨床確診個案基因檢測資料重新分析 16 2.4 鑲嵌型患者血液與唾液檢體分析比較 17 2.4.1 受試者篩選條件 18 2.5 結節性硬化症衛教照護手冊 18 第三章 研究結果 19 3.1 結節性硬化症基因變異點在 LOVD 及 ClinVar 資料庫的差異 19 3.1.1 LOVD 資料庫 19 3.1.2 ClinVar 資料庫 21 3.1.3 LOVD 與 ClinVar 差異 23 3.2 次世代定序 fastq 檔重新分析結果統計 24 3.2.1 台灣人工智慧實驗室 GenDiseak 平台分析結果 24 3.2.2 大規模平行剪接基因檢測(MPSA) 分析結果 32 3.3 鑲嵌型患者變異位點分析 35 3.4 提供患者疾病照護手冊 36 3.5 基因檢測檢出率 37 第四章 討論 39 第五章 結論 41 參考文獻 43 附錄 45 附錄一、TSC2 PCR primers表格 45 附錄二、TSC個案基因檢測結果與ACMG guideline判讀等級 45 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | GenDiseak | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 鑲嵌型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 疾病照護手冊 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 次世代定序 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 疾病資料庫 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 結節性硬化症 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 剪接位點變異 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Mosaicism | en |
| dc.subject | Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) | en |
| dc.subject | Diseases Database | en |
| dc.subject | Next-generation sequencing (NGS) | en |
| dc.subject | Splicing mutation | en |
| dc.subject | Disease care handbook | en |
| dc.subject | GenDiseak | en |
| dc.title | 次世代定序資料重新分析以釐清 TSC1 及 TSC2 基因變異位點之致病性 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Reanalysis of next-generation sequencing (NGS) data to clarify the pathogenicity of variants in TSC1 and TSC2 | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 楊偉勛;范碧娟 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Wei-Shiung Yang;Pi-Chuan Fan | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 結節性硬化症,疾病資料庫,次世代定序,剪接位點變異,鑲嵌型,疾病照護手冊,GenDiseak, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC),Diseases Database,Next-generation sequencing (NGS),Splicing mutation,Mosaicism,Disease care handbook,GenDiseak, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 46 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202402312 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-06 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 分子醫學研究所 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2029-07-22 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 分子醫學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.75 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
