請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9493完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 孫岩章(En-Jang Sun) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sheng-Jr Tzeng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 曾勝志 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T20:25:15Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2010-08-02 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T20:25:15Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-02 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-07-29 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1.柯 勇。2008。台灣經濟果樹病害彩色圖鑑。藝軒圖書出版社。台北。
2.徐世典、張東柱、張清安、蔡進來、蔡東纂編。2002。台灣植物病害名彙。第四版。中華民國植物病理學會。 3.楊秀珠。1990。臺灣植物炭疽病菌種類之研究。日本北海道大學農學院農學博士論文。札幌。 4.劉顯達。1995。可可椰子栽培與病蟲害防治。國立屏東技術學院農業推廣委員會。屏東。 5.Aberdeen, J. E. C., and Patil-Kulkarni, B. C. 1969. The measurement of the concentration and distribution of Ceratocystis paradoxa (De Seynes) moreau in soil. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 20:843-856. 6.Alexopoulos, C. J., Mims, C. W., and Blackwell, M. 1996. Introductory Mycology. 4th edition. Wiley Far Eastern Limited, New Delhi. 7.Barnett, H. L., and Hunter B. B. 1972. Illustrated Genera of Imperfect Fungi. Burgess Pub. Co., Minneapolis. 8.Camargo, M., and Gimenes-Fernandes, N. 1997. Occurrence of fruit basal rot in common coconut in the high plain of São Paulo. Summa Phytopathologica 23(2):164-166. 9.Christen, P., Meza, J. C., and Revah, S. 1997. Fruity aroma production in solid state fermentation by Ceratocystis fimbriata: influence of the substrate type and the presence of precursors. Mycol. Res. 101:911-919. 10.Dade, H. A. 1928. Ceratostomella paradoxa, the perfect stage of Thielaviopsis paradoxa (De Seynes) von Höhnel. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 13:184-194. 11.Janisiewicz, W. J., and Korsten, L. 2002. Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 40:411-441. 12.Kiryu, T. 1939. Studies on the physiological characters of Ceratostomella paradoxa. Report Government Sugar Experiment Station, Taiwan. 6:21-37. 13.Ko, S. S., Kunimoto, R. K., and Ko, W. H. 2001. A simple technique for purifying fungal cultures contaminated with bacteria and mites. J. Phytopathol. 149:509-510. 14.Kumar, A., and Nambiar, K. K. N. 1990. Effect of certain physical and chemical factors on the germination of endoconidia and chlamydospores of Thielaviopsis paradoxa. Indian phytopathol. 43(3):460-462. 15.Liu, L., and Marcano, A. R. 1973. Sexual compatibility, morphology, physiology, pathogenicity and in vitro sensitivity to fungicides of Thielaviopsis paradoxa infecting sugarcane and pineapple in Puerto Rico. J. Agric. Univ. Puerto Rico 57:117-128. 16.Morgan, J. G. 1967. Ceratocystis fimbriata. No. 141 in: CMI Descriptions of Pathogenic Fungi and Bacteria. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Surrey, England. 17.Morgan, J. G. 1967. Ceratocystis moniliformis. No. 142 in: CMI Descriptions of Pathogenic Fungi and Bacteria. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Surrey, England. 18.Morgan, J. G. 1967. Ceratocystis paradoxa. No. 143 in: CMI Descriptions of Pathogenic Fungi and Bacteria. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Surrey, England. 19.Paulin-Mahady, A. E., Harrington, T. C., and McNew, D. 2002. Phylogenetic and taxonomic evaluation of Chalara, Chalaropsis, and Thielaviopsis anamorphs associated with Ceratocystis. Mycologia 94(1):62-72. 20.Rao, K. S. N., Sreekantiah, K. R., and Rao, T. N. R. 1972. Post-harvest infection of coconut kernel by Botryodiplodia theobromae and a note on the hydrolygic enzymes secreted by the fungus. Indian phytopathol. 24(4):815-819. 21.Rohrbach, K. G., and Phillips, D. J. 1990. Postharvest diseases of pineapple. Acta Hortic. 269:503-507. 22.Rossetti, V. 1955. 'Crostas Pretas' das folhas e 'Podridão Basal' dos frutos de coqueiro. O Biológico 21:54. 23.Reyes, M. E. Q., Rohrbach, K. G., and Paull, R. E. 2004. Microbial antagonists control postharvest black rot of pineapple fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 33:193-203. 24.Sastry, M. N. L., Patil-Kulkarni, B. G., Hegde, R. K., and Hiremath, P. C. 1989. Studies on the disease caused by Thielaviopsis state of Ceratocystis paradoxa (Dade) Moreau on arecanut, coconut and sugarcane 1. Morphological, cultural and cross inoculation studies of three isolates of Ceratocystis paradoxa. Mysore J. Agric. Sci. 23(1):44-48. 25.Simone, G. W. 2004. Thielaviopsis diseases. Pages 37-38 in: Compendium of Ornamental Palm Diseases and Disorders. Elliott, M. L., Broschat, T. K., Uchida, J. Y., and Simone, G. W., eds. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN. 26.Soares, M., Christen, P., Pandey, A., and Soccol, C. R. 2000. Fruity flavour production by Ceratocystis fimbriata grown on coffee husk in solid-state fermentation, Process Biochem. 35(8):857-861. 27.Steer, J., and Coates-Beckford, P. L. 1990. Role of Phytophthora katsurae, P. palmivora, Thielaviopsis paradoxa and Enterobacter sp. in budrot disease of coconuts in Jamaica. Oléagineux 45(12):539-545. 28.Streets, R. B. 1933. Heart rot of Date palm Aricono Agriculture. Experimental Station Technical Bulletin, 48:443-463. 29.Upadhyay, H. P. 1981. Monograph of Ceratocystis and Ceratocystiopsis. University of Georgia Press, Athens, USA. 30.Viana F. M. P., Freire F. C. O., Barguil B. M., Alves R. E., Santos A. A., Cardoso J. E., and Vidal J. C. 2002. Post-harvest basal rot of coconut fruits in the State of Ceará, Brazil. Fitopatologia Brasileira 27(5):545. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9493 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 可可椰子(Cocos nucifera L.)為熱帶地區重要經濟作物,然而採收後鮮果實的儲藏問題,一直以來皆困擾著相關行業從事者。作者於2005年間,發現採自屏東縣九如、長治、內埔等地之椰子果實,在採收數日後,開始自果頂或果實傷口出現果肉黑化、軟化之病徵,以及帶有特殊香味之病兆。自罹病果實內部可分離出一種於PDA平板培養基上菌落初期白色、一至二天後變黑,且散發強烈水果香氣之有隔真菌。該菌可產生兩種無性孢子,一種為自長形壺狀產孢梗開口冒出成長串之分生孢子,分生孢子短筒至長筒形、無色,成熟後為卵形,且略為厚壁,顏色轉為黑色,大小為8.5-16.0 × 4.7-6.7μm,其產胞梗大小為80.0-155.0 × 5.0-7.8μm;另一種為菌絲末端特化形成之卵形、黑色,排列成短鏈狀之厚膜孢子,大小為13.4-25.0 × 8.9-12.5μm。以分離所得菌株配對進行對峙培養,在兩個月後發現其中一組菌株配對產生淡咖啡色、球狀子囊殼,大小約280μm,有長約1100μm之黑色長喙;此子囊殼產生之子囊孢子為梭形,部分彎向一側,大小約12 × 3μm。依上述之形態特性,將此菌鑑定為Ceratocystis paradoxa (Dade) C. Moreau(無性世代:Thielaviopsis paradoxa (de Seynes) Höhn)。將此分離菌株接種於椰子果實上,可產生與最初發現相同之病徵,並且可再分離得到相同之菌株。此病原菌菌絲最適生長溫度為25-30℃,此時生長速度可達3.3cm/day,低於10℃或高於35℃時則幾乎不生長。在已知文獻中,此病原菌可在椰子樹上造成樹幹流膠病(stem bleeding)與心芽腐敗病(bud rot),另在1955年巴西曾有果實蒂腐病(fruit basal rot)之報導,且病源同為C. paradoxa,但建議本病害亦可稱為黑腐病(black rot)。在病害調查上,發現此病害週年均可發生,但採收後開始發病之日數,則依時序而異,尤其在6~10月間,採收後10天內之發病率可上升至2%。而在寄主範圍上,本菌株可在鳳梨果實上造成鳳梨黑腐病(病原菌亦為C. paradoxa)之病徵,故此二病害之病原應屬相同。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) is an important economic crop in tropical areas. Just like other fruits, the post-harvest diseases are big problems for farmers. Since 2005, coconut fruits harvested from Jiouru, Changjr, Neipu in Pintung county have showed a fruit rot disease. Principal symptoms are blackening of exocarp, mesocarp and then endocarp of coconut fruit. The affected fruit usually emitted fruit-type fragrant. A fungus was consistently isolated from the diseased fruits. Its colony on PDA plate was white in early stage but became black one or two days later. It emitred a strong fruity fragrance. This fungus produced two asexual spores. The first was phialospore-type conidia released in long chains from tip of long phialides. They were hyaline to mid-brown, cylindral to somewhat oval and thick-walled when mature, 8.5-16.0 × 4.7-6.7μm. The phialide had the size of 80.0-155.0 × 5.0-7.8μm. The second was chlamydospore formed in short chains from specialized hyphal tip, oval, black, 13.4-25.0 × 8.9-12.5μm. Dual cultures of all paired isolates on PDA with one piece of coconut exocarp induced the production of perithecia. Perithecia were brown, globose, 280μm in diameter, with a 1100μm long neck. Ascospores were ellipsoid, but some were unequally bent, 12 × 3 μm. According these characteristics, this fungus was identified as Ceratocystis paradoxa (Dade) C. Moreau (Anamorph:Thielaviopsis paradoxa (de Seynes) Höhn). Inoculation of all wild-type isolates on healthy coconut fruits reproduced the same black rot disease. The same pathogen was reisolated from the inoculated fruits. The temperature for hyphae growth of this fungus was 25-30℃, with the growth rate of 3.3cm/day. It cannot grow at temperatures lower than 10℃ or higher than 35℃. This pathogen was reported to cause stem bleeding disease in 2004 and bud rot disease of coconut in 1993, but a disease called fruit basal rot of coconut have been reported in 1955 in Brazil. With the same pathogen, we suggest this newly found disease can be also named as black rot. This disease accused on coconut fruits around all seasons, but is more serius in warm seasons, especially in the period from June to October. Disease incidence could reach 2% after 10 days of fruit storage. This black rot pathogen caused black rot disease of pineapple, while the pathogen from black rot of pineapple also caused black rot of coconut fruit, indicating that both diseases have the identical pathogen. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T20:25:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R95633013-1.pdf: 979569 bytes, checksum: b16c44f2707f40e319fbd67fec00045b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書...................................................................................................................i
誌謝...........................................................................................................................................ii 內容目錄..................................................................................................................................iii 表目錄......................................................................................................................................vi 圖目錄.....................................................................................................................................vii 中文摘要..................................................................................................................................ix 英文摘要..................................................................................................................................xi 第一章 前言.............................................................................................................................1 一、可可椰子的介紹....................................................................................................1 二、可可椰子果實收穫後的管理問題.......................................................................2 三、研究目的.................................................................................................................2 第二章 前人研究....................................................................................................................4 第三章 材料方法....................................................................................................................6 一、可可椰子採收後病害之調查...............................................................................6 二、可可椰子黑腐病病原菌株之分離及鑑定..........................................................8 三、可可椰子黑腐病分離株之病原性檢定..............................................................9 (一)分離株菌絲之病原性檢定.......................................................................9 (二)分離株孢子懸浮液之病原性檢定..........................................................9 (三)分離株菌絲對可可椰子中果皮切面之接種實驗................................9 四、可可椰子黑腐病菌株孢子發芽特性之觀察....................................................10 (一)可可椰子黑腐病菌株分生孢子發芽特性之觀察..............................10 (二)可可椰子黑腐病菌株厚膜孢子發芽特性之觀察..............................10 五、可可椰子黑腐病菌株有性世代之誘發............................................................11 六、溫度對可可椰子黑腐病菌株生長速度之影響...............................................11 七、溼度對可可椰子接種黑腐病菌後發病嚴重度之影響...................................11 八、可可椰子黑腐病菌株之寄主範圍測定............................................................12 (一)可可椰子黑腐病菌株對甘蔗苗之病原性檢定...................................12 (二)可可椰子黑腐病菌株對鳳梨果實之病原性檢定..............................12 第四章 結果...........................................................................................................................14 一、可可椰子收穫後病害之調查.............................................................................14 二、可可椰子黑腐病病原菌株之分離及鑑定........................................................16 三、可可椰子黑腐病分離株對可可椰子果實之病原性檢定結果......................20 (一)以分離株培養菌絲塊對可可椰子全果實進行接種之結果.............20 (二)以分離株孢子懸浮液對可可椰子全果實進行接種之結果.............20 (三)以分離株培養菌絲塊對可可椰子果實切片進行接種之結果.........22 四、可可椰子黑腐病病原菌株孢子發芽特性之觀察...........................................24 (一)可可椰子黑腐病病原菌株分生孢子發芽特性之觀察......................24 (二)可可椰子黑腐病病原菌株厚膜孢子發芽特性之觀察......................26 五、可可椰子黑腐病病原菌株有性世代之誘發....................................................28 六、溫度對可可椰子黑腐病病原菌株生長速度之影響.......................................29 七、溼度對可可椰子黑腐病發生之影響................................................................31 八、可可椰子黑腐病病原菌株之寄主範圍測定....................................................32 (一)可可椰子黑腐病病原菌株對甘蔗苗之病原性檢定..........................32 (二)可可椰子黑腐病病原菌株對鳳梨果實之病原性檢定......................33 第五章 討論...........................................................................................................................35 一、可可椰子採收後病害之調查..............................................................................35 二、可可椰子黑腐病病原菌株之分離及鑑定.........................................................35 三、可可椰子黑腐病分離株之病原性檢定.............................................................36 四、可可椰子黑腐病菌株孢子發芽特性之觀察.....................................................37 五、可可椰子黑腐病菌株有性世代之誘發.............................................................39 六、溫度對可可椰子黑腐病菌株生長速度之影響................................................40 七、溼度對可可椰子接種黑腐病菌後發病嚴重度之影響....................................40 八、可可椰子黑腐病菌株之寄主範圍測定.............................................................41 參考文獻.........................................................................................................................42 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 可可椰子果實蒂腐病之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Research on Fruit Basal Rot of Coconut | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蘇鴻基,柯文雄,沈湯龍 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 可可椰子,果實蒂腐病,收穫後病害,Ceratocystis paradoxa,Thielaviopsis paradoxa, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | coconut,fruit basal rot,post-harvest disease,Ceratocystis paradoxa,Thielaviopsis paradoxa, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 44 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-07-30 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 植物病理與微生物學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 植物病理與微生物學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-97-1.pdf | 956.61 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
