Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 生物產業傳播暨發展學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94760
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor王淑美zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorShu-Mei Wangen
dc.contributor.author王天妤zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorTien-Yu Wangen
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-19T16:09:48Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-20-
dc.date.copyright2024-08-19-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.date.submitted2024-08-05-
dc.identifier.citation王天妤、王淑美、李揚(2022年12月3日)。應用 BoD 模型建構企業 ESG 綜合指標:以臺灣食品加工產業為例。在方進義(主持),Session 1永續發展與效率〔研討會演講〕。台灣效率與生產力學會學術論文研討會,臺北市,臺灣。
行政院主計總處(2021)。中華民國行業標準分類(第11次修訂)。https://www.stat.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=3110&s=90015
行政院食品安全辦公室(2023)。食安五環。 https://www.ey.gov.tw/achievement/C373BCE23CFF4324
李揚、鐘棠祺(2015)。半導體產業之績效評估:跨國分析與比較。東吳經紀商學學報,89,61-88。
邱玉蟬、游絲涵(2016)。食品安全事件的風險建構與溝通:新聞媒體 VS. 政府。中華傳播學刊,30,179-220。
衛生福利部「食品安全衛生管理法」(1975年1月28日公布,2019年6月12日修正)。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=L0040001
財團法人中華民國消費者文教基金會(2016)。2015年十大消費新聞。https://www.consumers.org.tw/product-detail-2727020.html
產業價值鏈資訊平台(2010)。食品產業鏈簡介。https://ic.tpex.org.tw/introduce.php?ic=M000
農業部(2023)。邁向農業淨零排放。https://ccpo.moa.gov.tw/index.php
臺灣證券交易所「上市公司編製與申報永續報告書作業辦法」(2014年11月26日公布,2022年9月22日修正)。https://twse-regulation.twse.com.tw/TW/law/DAT0201.aspx?FLCODE=FL075209
Alareeni, B. A., & Hamdan, A. (2020). ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms. Corporate Governance, 20(7), 1409–1428. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2020-0258
Albitar, K., Hussainey, K., Kolade, N., & Gerged, A. M. (2020). ESG disclo- sure and firm performance before and after IR: The moderating role of governance mechanisms. International Journal of Accounting and Infor- mation Management, 28(3), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-09-2019-0108
Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., Zhang, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: theory and empirical evidence. Management science, 65(10), 4451–4469. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3043
Alexandratos, N., & Bruinsma, J. (2012). World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.288998
Alonso, M. E., González-Montaña, J. R., & Lomillos, J. M. (2020). Consumers’ concerns and perceptions of farm animal welfare. Animals, 10(3), 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030385
Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2013). The porter hypoth- esis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7, 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/res016
Atif, M., & Ali, S. (2021). Environmental, social and governance disclosure and default risk. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3937-3959. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2850
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
Barman, E. (2018). Doing well by doing good: A comparative analysis of esg standards for responsible investment. Advances in Strategic Management, 38, 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220180000038016
Belasri, S., Gomes, M., & Pijourlet, G. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and bank efficiency. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 54, 100612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2020.100612
Benton, T. G., & Bailey, R. (2019). The paradox of productivity: agricultural productivity promotes food system inefficiency. Global Sustainability, 2, e6. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2019.3
Buallay, A. (2022). Sustainability reporting in food industry: An innovative tool for enhancing financial performance. British Food Journal, 124(6), 1939-1958. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2021-0053
Caraka, R. E., Lee, Y., Kurniawan, R., Herliansyah, R., Kaban, P. A., Nasution, B. I., ... & Pardamean, B. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 large scale restriction on environment and economy in Indonesia. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 6(Special Issue (Covid-19)), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.22034/GJESM.2019.06.SI.07
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
Chen, P. C., Yu, M. M., Chang, C. C., Hsu, S. H., & Managi, S. (2015). The enhanced Russell-based directional distance measure with undesirable outputs: Numerical example considering CO2 emissions. Omega, 53, 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.12.001
Chiu, Y. H., Huang, K. Y., Lin, T. Y., & Chang, T. H. (2022). Government debt and fiscal execution efficiency. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(1), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3362
Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O'donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer science & business media.
COP28 UAE (2023). https://www.cop28.com/en/food-and-agriculture
Chung, Y. H., R. Färe and S. Grosskopf. (1997). Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 51, 229-240. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1997.0146
Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluat- ing corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994
Cordeiro, J.J. and Sarkis, J. (1997). Environmental proactivism and firm performance: evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts. Business Strategy and the Environment, 6(2), 104-114. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199705)6:2<104::AID-BSE102>3.0.CO;2-T
De Boeck, E., Jacxsens, L., Bollaerts, M., Uyttendaele, M., & Vlerick, P. (2016). Interplay between food safety climate, food safety management system and microbiological hygiene in farm butcheries and affiliated butcher shops. Food control, 65, 78-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.01.014
Engelhardt, N., Ekkenga, J., & Posch, P. (2021). ESG ratings and stock per- formance during the COVID-19 crisis. Sustainability, 13(13), 7133. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137133
Engida, T. G., Rao, X., Berentsen, P. B., & Lansink, A. G. O. (2018). Measuring corporate sustainability performance: The case of European food and beverage companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 734-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.095
FAO. (2022). Greenhouse gas emissions from agrifood systems. Global, regional and country trends, 2000-2020. FAOSTAT Analytical Brief Series No. 50. Rome, FAO. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/121cc613-3d0f-431c-b083-cc2031dd8826/content
FAO. (2023). Achieving SDG2 without breaching the 1.5C threshold A Global Roadmap – Part 1. https://www.fao.org/interactive/sdg2-roadmap/assets/3d-models/inbrief-roadmap.pdf
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Noh, D. W., & Weber, W. (2005). Characteristics of a polluting technology: theory and practice. Journal of Econometrics, 126(2), 469-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.05.010
Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2010). Directional distance functions and slacks- based measures of efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 320–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.031
Farrell, M. J. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency of Production. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 120(111), 253-281. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100
Feldman, G. A. (1997). Performance measure congruity and diversity in multi-task principal/agent relations. Accounting Review, 69(3), 429–453. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248233
Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of management studies, 39(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00280
Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston.
Forsund, F. R., & Sarafoglou, N. (2002). On the Origins of Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17(1/2), 23–40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41770070
Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and csr research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889
Groening, C., & Kanuri, V. K. (2013). Investor reaction to positive and negative corporate social events. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1852-1860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.006
He, Y., & Chen, W. (2023). Evaluation of sustainable development policy of Sichuan citrus industry in China based on DEA–Malmquist index and did model. Sustainability, 15(5), 4260. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054260
Hübel, B., & Scholz, H. (2020). Integrating sustainability risks in asset man- agement: the role of ESG exposures and ESG ratings. Journal of Asset Management, 21(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-019-00139-z
Inoue, Y., & Lee, S. (2010). Effects of different dimensions of corporate social responsibility on corporate financial performance in tourism- related industries. Tourism Management, 32(4), 790–804. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.06.019
Ionescu, G. H., Firoiu, D., Pirvu, R., & Vilag, R. D. (2019). The impact of ESG factors on market value of companies from travel and tourism industry. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25(5), 820-849. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2019.10294
Jamal, T., Zahid, M., Martins, J. M., Mata, M. N., Rahman, H. U., & Mata, P. N. (2021). Perceived green human resource management practices and corporate sustainability: Multigroup analysis and major industries perspectives. Sustainability, 13(6), 3045. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063045
Kapelko, M., Oude Lansink, A., & Guillamon-Saorin, E. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and dynamic productivity change in the US food and beverage manufacturing industry. Agribusiness, 37(2), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21645
Kim, S. & Li, Z. (F). (2021). Understanding the impact of ESG practices in corporate finance. Sustainability, 13, 3746. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073746
Kurznack, L., Schoenmaker, D., & Schramade, W. (2021). A model of long-term value creation. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1920231
Krasachat, W., & Yaisawarng, S. (2021). Directional distance function technical efficiency of chili production in Thailand. Sustainability, 13(2), 741. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020741
Kyrgiakos, L. S., Vlontzos, G., & Pardalos, P. M. (2021). Ranking EU agricultural sectors under the prism of alternative widths on window DEA. Energies, 14(4), 1021. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14041021
Leesatapornwongsa, F., Thawesaengskulthai, N., & Vaiyavuth, R. (2023). Developing a Sustainability Measurement for Innovation Performance for the Food Industry. Sustainability, 15(24), 16714. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416714
Lehoux, P., Silva, H. P., Denis, J. L., Miller, F. A., Pozelli Sabio, R., & Mendell, M. (2021). Moving toward responsible value creation: Business model challenges faced by organizations producing responsible health innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(5), 548-573. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12596
Lopes, C., Leitão, J., & Rengifo-Gallego, J. (2022). Place-branded foods with responsible and sustainable management: A la carte serving in regional restaurants. Sustainability, 14(11), 6615. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su14116615
López, M.V., Garcia, A. and Rodriguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones sustainability index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(3), 285-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9253-8
Lu, W. M., Wang, W. K., Hung, S. W., & Lu, E. T. (2012). The effects of corporate governance on airline performance: Production and marketing efficiency perspectives. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(2), 529-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.09.003
Maqbool, S., & Zameer, M. N. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: An empirical analysis of Indian banks. Future Busi- ness Journal, 4(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2017.12.002
Minutolo, M. C., Kristjanpoller, W. D., & Stakeley, J. (2019). Exploring envi- ronmental, social, and governance disclosure effects on the S&P 500 financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1083–1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2303
Nikmaram, N., & Rosentrater, K. A. (2019). Overview of some recent advances in improving water and energy efficiencies in food processing factories. Frontiers in nutrition, 6, 20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2019.00020
Nunes, J., da Silva, P. D., Andrade, L. P., Domingues, L., & Gasper, P. D. (2016). Energy assessment of the Portuguese meat industry. Energy Efficiency, 9, 1163-1178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-015-9414-7
OECD (1998). Eco-efficiency. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910
Pagotto, M., & Halog, A. (2016). Towards a circular economy in Australian agri‐food industry: An application of input‐output oriented approaches for analyzing resource efficiency and competitiveness potential. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(5), 1176-1186. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12373
Pandey, V., Vidal, N., Panwar, R., & Nafees, L. (2019). Characterization of sustainability leaders and laggards in the global food industry. Sustainability, 11(18), 5072. https://doi:10.3390/su11185072
Partalidou, X., Zafeiriou, E., Giannarakis, G., & Sariannidis, N. (2020). The effect of corporate social responsibility performance on financial per- formance: The case of food industry. Benchmarking, 27(10), 2701– 2720. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-11-2019-0501
Picazo-Tadeo, A. J., Beltrán-Esteve, M., & Gómez-Limón, J. A. (2012). Assessing eco-efficiency with directional distance functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 220(3), 798-809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.02.025
Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment‐competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Per- spectives, 9, 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R. (2011). The Big Idea: Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Rev. 89, 2–17.
Portela, M. C. A. S., Thanassoulis, E., & Simpson, G. (2004). Negative data in DEA: A directional distance approach applied to Bank branches. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(10), 1111–1121. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601768
Prasanna, S., Verma, P., & Bodh, S. (2024). The role of food industries in sustainability transition: A review. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04642-1
Qiu L., Yu R., Hu F., Zhou H., Hu H. (2023). How can China's medical manufacturing listed firms improve their technological innovation efficiency? An analysis based on a three-stage DEA model and corporate governance configurations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, 122684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122684.
Quan, C., Yu, S., Cheng, X., & Liu, F. (2022). Comprehensive efficiency evaluation of social responsibility of Chinese listed logistics enterprises based on DEA-Malmquist model. Operations Management Research, 15(3), 1383-1398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-022-00258-8
Raimo, N., de Nuccio, E., Giakoumelou, A., Petruzzella, F., & Vitolla, F. (2020). Non-financial information and cost of equity capital: An empirical analysis in the food and beverage industry. British Food Journal, 123(1), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2020-0278
Sandberg, H., Alnoor, A., & Tiberius, V. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance ratings and financial performance: Evidence from the European food industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 2471–2489. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3259
Seo, S., Jang, S. S., Miao, L., Almanza, B., & Behnke, C. (2013). The impact of food safety events on the value of food-related firms: An event study approach. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 33, 153-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.07.008
Sharfman, M., & Fernando, C. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 569–592. https: //doi.org/10.1002/smj.678
Telle, K. (2006). It pays to be green – A premature conclusion? Environ- mental and Resource Economics, 35(3), 195–220. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10640-006-9013-3
Titko, J., Stankevičienė, J., & Lāce, N. (2014). Measuring bank efficiency: DEA application. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(4), 739-757. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.984255
Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5
Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2014). Dynamic DEA with network structure: A slacks-based measure approach. Omega, 42(1), 124-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.04.002
Tsolakis, N., Anastasiadis, F., & Srai, J. S. (2018). Sustainability performance in food supply networks: Insights from the UK industry. Sustainability, 10(9), 3148. https://doi:10.3390/su10093148
Van Woerkum, C. M., & van Lieshout, I. M. (2007). Reputation management in agro‐food industries: safety first. British Food Journal, 109(5), 355-366. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700710746777
Weber, O. (2014). Environmental, social and governance reporting in China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23, 303–317. https:// doi.org/10.1002/bse.1785
Xie, X., & Li, K. (2022). Measuring total‐factor energy environment efficiency, energy‐saving and carbon emission‐reduction potential in China's food industry: Based on a meta‐frontier slacks‐based measure model. Food and Energy security, 11(1), e324. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.324
Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2224
Xue, R., Wang, H., Yang, Y., Linnenluecke, M. K., Jin, K., & Cai, C. W. (2023). The adverse impact of corporate ESG controversies on sustainable investment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 427, 139237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139237
Yu, X., & Xiao, K. (2022). Does ESG performance affect firm value? Evidence from a new ESG-scoring approach for Chinese enterprises. Sustainability, 14(24), 16940. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416940
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94760-
dc.description.abstract隨著全球永續浪潮興起,永續發展成為國際社會上至政策下至產業界的共同目標共識,ESG實踐也已然成為當代企業經營之關鍵議題,永續績效和市場績效之間的關聯愈趨緊密。故本研究以臺灣28間上市、上櫃的食品加工企業作為研究樣本,應用資料包絡分析方法(data envelopment analysis, DEA)當中的二階段併行的動態RDM DDF模型,計算食品加工企業的經營與安全效率、永續效率以及市場效率,並且分析經營與安全階段、永續階段各自對於市場階段之影響關係,藉以分析臺灣食品加工產業的永續發展現況,協助企業推動永續轉型。
研究結果發現,臺灣食品加工企業的經營與安全效率、永續效率和市場效率皆尚有諸多進步空間,28間企業當中僅有四間在三個階段皆達到最佳效率;並且整體而言企業在永續階段的表現最不穩定,產業平均永續效率在研究期間2017年至2022年呈現下降的趨勢。此外,研究進一步透過相關性分析檢視階段之間的影響性,證實經營與安全效率和市場效率,以及永續效率和市場效率之間皆存在正向的影響關係,企業的食品安全管理能力和永續投入將會反映在市場營運表現,影響其獲利能力和市場價值。因此,研究建議企業應將食安及永續相關投入納入公司本身的風險管理架構和經營決策考量,積極強化食安自主管理能力,同時重視ESG三面向的均衡投入並提高資源使用效率,藉以回應各方利害關係者的期待,建立正面的聲譽並且降低財務風險,據此增進市場競爭力,創造企業長期價值。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractWith the rise of global sustainability trends, sustainable development has become a consensus goal across international policy and industry sectors. ESG (environmental, social, and governance) practices have emerged as a critical issue in contemporary corporate management, increasingly linking sustainability performance with market performance. This study focuses on 28 publicly listed food companies in Taiwan, employing the Parallel Two-Stage Dynamic RDM DDF model within data envelopment analysis (DEA) to assess their operational and safety efficiency, sustainability efficiency, and market efficiency. The research further analyzes the impact of the operational and safety stage and the sustainability stage on the market stage to evaluate the current state of sustainable development within Taiwan’s food industry, aiming to assist companies in driving sustainable transformation.
The results reveal significant room for improvement in operational and safety efficiency, sustainability efficiency, and market efficiency among Taiwan's food processing companies. Only four out of the 28 companies reached the efficiency frontier in all three stages. Overall, the performance in the sustainability stage was the most unstable, with the average sustainability efficiency of the industry showing a declining trend from 2017 to 2022. Additionally, correlation analysis confirmed positive relationships between operational and safety efficiency and market efficiency, as well as between sustainability efficiency and market efficiency. Companies' capabilities in food safety management and sustainability investments are reflected in their market performance, influencing profitability and market value. Therefore, the study recommends that companies incorporate food safety and sustainability-related investments into their risk management frameworks and business decision-making processes. They should actively enhance autonomous food safety management capabilities, prioritize balanced investments across ESG dimensions, and improve resource use efficiency to meet stakeholder expectations, build a positive reputation, and reduce financial risks. This, in turn, will enhance market competitiveness and create long-term corporate value.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-19T16:09:48Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-08-19T16:09:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員審定書---------------------------------------------------------------------i
謝誌-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------ii
摘要----------------------------------------------------------------------------------iii
Abstract------------------------------------------------------------------------------iv
目次----------------------------------------------------------------------------------vi
圖次----------------------------------------------------------------------------------ix
表次-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------x
第一章、緒論------------------------------------------------------------------------1
第一節、研究背景與動機-----------------------------------------------1
第二節、研究目的-------------------------------------------------------6
第二章、文獻探討-----------------------------------------------------------------7
第一節、全球永續發展歷程-------------------------------------------7
2.1.1 永續發展趨勢--------------------------------------------7
2.1.2 經濟發展與永續發展-----------------------------------8
2.1.3 企業管理與永續發展-----------------------------------8
第二節、 ESG 績效與市場效率----------------------------------------11
2.2.1 ESG 評級指標市場現況-------------------------------11
2.2.2 ESG 績效與企業財務績效關係----------------------14
2.2.3 ESG 績效與企業市場價值關係----------------------16
第三節、食品加工產業的永續發展趨勢----------------------------18
2.3.1 食品加工產業與永續發展----------------------------18
2.3.2 食品加工產業的食品安全議題----------------------20
2.3.3 食品加工產業的永續效率----------------------------22
第三章、研究方法-----------------------------------------------------------------24
第一節、研究流程-------------------------------------------------------24
3.1.1 研究流程步驟-------------------------------------------24
第二節、研究方法------------------------------------------------------25
3.2.1 資料包絡分析法簡介----------------------------------25
3.2.2 DEA 模型與企業永續效率---------------------------26
3.2.3 方向距離函數之應用----------------------------------27
3.2.4 本研究實證模型----------------------------------------29
第三節、研究樣本-------------------------------------------------------33
3.3.1 研究樣本-------------------------------------------------33
第四章、研究結果-----------------------------------------------------------------37
第一節、食品加工產業之安全效率、永續效率與市場效率----37
4.1.1 經營與安全效率值-------------------------------------37
4.1.2 永續效率值----------------------------------------------42
4.1.3 市場效率值----------------------------------------------45
第二節、階段效率值與總效率值分析-------------------------------49
4.2.1 經營安全效率與市場效率----------------------------50
4.2.2 永續效率與市場效率----------------------------------55
第三節、分群分析-------------------------------------------------------60
4.3.1 依據生產形式之企業分群比較----------------------60
第五章、結論與建議--------------------------------------------------------------64
第一節、 討論與結論----------------------------------------------------64
第二節、研究限制與未來建議----------------------------------------69
參考文獻----------------------------------------------------------------------------71
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject食品加工產業zh_TW
dc.subject資料包絡分析zh_TW
dc.subject市場效率zh_TW
dc.subject永續效率zh_TW
dc.subject食品安全zh_TW
dc.subjectfood safetyen
dc.subjectmarket efficiencyen
dc.subjectfood industryen
dc.subjectdata envelopment analysisen
dc.subjectsustainability efficiencyen
dc.title臺灣食品加工產業之經營與安全效率、永續效率及市場效率研究zh_TW
dc.titleA Study on the Operational and Safety Efficiency, Sustainability Efficiency, and Market Efficiency of Taiwan's Food Industryen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear112-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee邱永和;林泰宇zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeYung-Ho Chiu;Tai-Yu Linen
dc.subject.keyword食品加工產業,食品安全,永續效率,市場效率,資料包絡分析,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordfood industry,food safety,sustainability efficiency,market efficiency,data envelopment analysis,en
dc.relation.page81-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202403047-
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)-
dc.date.accepted2024-08-08-
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept生物產業傳播暨發展學系-
dc.date.embargo-lift2029-08-01-
顯示於系所單位:生物產業傳播暨發展學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-112-2.pdf
  未授權公開取用
2 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved