Skip navigation

DSpace JSPUI

DSpace preserves and enables easy and open access to all types of digital content including text, images, moving images, mpegs and data sets

Learn More
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Publication Year
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Advisor
  • Search TDR
  • Rights Q&A
    • My Page
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 園藝暨景觀學系
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9444
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield???ValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor陳右人(Iou-Zen Chen)
dc.contributor.authorHuai-En Kuoen
dc.contributor.author郭懷恩zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-20T20:22:54Z-
dc.date.available2009-02-03
dc.date.available2021-05-20T20:22:54Z-
dc.date.copyright2009-02-03
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.submitted2009-01-19
dc.identifier.citation朱亭錚. 2007. 臺灣草苺栽培之過去與前瞻. 國立臺灣大學園藝研究所碩士論文 p.85. 台北.
李心瑩. 1998. 利用低溫處理改變豐香品種草苺的生長發育期. 國立臺灣大學園藝研究所碩士論文. p.68. 台北.
李窓明. 1993. 台灣草苺產業演進四十年.台灣蔬菜產業演進四十年專集. 霧峰.台灣農業試驗所編印. p.315-328.
李窓明. 1994. 草苺育苗管理. 桃園區農業專訊8:15-17.
李窓明. 1995a. 台灣草苺種苗繁殖與育種研究. 蔬菜育種研討會專刊 桃園農業改良場編印. p.97-122-.
李窓明. 1995b. 育苗容器與介質對草莓生育、開花期與產量之影響. 桃園區農業改良場研究報告21:1-6.
李窓明. 1996. 草苺穴植管育苗新技術介紹. 桃園區農業專訊15:16-17.
李窓明. 2000. 草苺穴植管育苗日數對植株生育與產量之影響. 桃園區農業改良場研究彙報41:1-5.
李窓明. 2001. 草苺穴植管苗誘植時期對育苗數與果實產量之影響. 桃園區農業改良場研究彙報44:1-7.
李窓明. 2002. 草苺育苗親株於不同海拔培育對育苗數與果實產量影響. 桃園農改場研究彙報51:1-6.
李窓明. 2006. 草苺. 臺灣農家要覽. 豐年社 p.575-580. 臺北.
李窓明、吳秋芬. 1985. 短日、遮光、斷根處理對草莓開花期與產量之影響. 中國園藝31:232-239.
張廣淼. 2005. 草莓高架床育苗新技術. 農政與農情156:95-97.
溫淑玲. 1984. 溫度對春香草苺生長發育之影響. 國立臺灣大學園藝研究所碩士論文 p.21-24. 台北.
蔡月夏. 1990. 草莓利用冷凍機夜冷育苗效果之探討. 花蓮區農業改良場研究彙報6 35-43.
鄭正勇. 2008. 個人通訊.
羅秋雄. 2005. 作物施肥手冊.p.88-89. 行政院農業委員會農糧署. 南投.
伏原肇. 1997. とよのかの生理・生態と栽培技術. p. 319-354. 刊於 : 農業技術大系野菜編 3(イチゴ), 農産漁村文化協会. 東京.
Albregts, E. E. 1968. Influence of plant size at transplanting on strawberry fruit yield. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc 81:163-167.
Albregts, E. E. and C. M. Howard. 1985. Correlation of leaf number at transplanting to strawberry fruit yield. HortScience 20:415-416.
Albregts, E. E. and C. M. Howard. 1986. Effect of runner removal on strawberry fruiting response. HortScience 21:97-98.
Awang, Y. B. and J. G. Atherton. 1995. Effect of plant size and salinity on the growth and fruiting of glasshouse strawberry. J. Hort. Sci. 70:257-262.
Barritt, B. H. 1974. The effect of gibberellic acid, blossom removal and planting date on strawberry runner plant production. HortScience 9:25-27.
Battey, N. H., P. L. Miére, A. Tehranifar, C. Cekic, S. Taylor, K. J. Shrives, P. Hadley, A. J. Greenland, J. Darby, and M. J. Wilkinson. 1998. Genetic and environmental control of flowering in strawberry, p. 111-131. In: K. E. Cockshuli, D. Gray, G. B. Seymour and B. Thomas (eds.). Genetic and environmental manipulation of horticultural crops. CAB international, New York.
Bish, E. B., D. J. Cantliffe, and C. K. Chandler. 2001. A system for producing large quantities of greenhouse-grown strawberry plantlets for plug production. HortTechnology 11:636-638.
Bish, E. B., D. J. Cantliffe, and C. K. Chandler. 2002. Temperature conditioning and container size affect early season fruit yield of strawberry plug plants in a winter, annual hill production system. HortScience 37:762-764.
Braun, J. W. and W. J. Kender. 1985. Correlative bud inhibition and growth habit of the strawberry as influenced by application of gibberellic acid, cytokinin, and chilling during short daylength. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 110:28-34.
Crawford, T. D., D. G. Himelrick, J. L. Sibley, and J. A. Pitts. 2000. Effect of runner plantlet size on performance of strawberry plug plants. Small Fruits Rev. 1:15-21.
Darnell, R. L., D. J. Cantliffe, and D. S. Kirschbaum. 2003. The physiology of flowering in strawberry. Hort. Rev. 28:325-349.
Darrow, G. M. 1936. Interrelation of temperature and photoperiodism in the production of fruit-buds and runners in the strawberry. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 34:360-363.
Dennis, F. G. and H. O. Bennett. 1969. Effects of gibberellic acid and deflowering upon runner and inflorescence development in an everbearing strawberry. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 5:534-537.
Dennis, F. G., J. Lipecki, and C. L. Kiang. 1970. Effects of photoperiod and other factors upon flowering and runner development of three strawberry cultivars. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 95:750-754.
Durner, E. F., J. A. Barden, D. G. Himelrick, and E. B. Poling. 1984a. Photoperiod and temperature effects on flower and runner development in day-neutral, Junebearing, and everbearing strawberries. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 109:396-400.
Durner, E. F., J. A. Barden, D. G. Himelrick, and E. B. Poling. 1984b. Photoperiod and temperature effects on flower and runner development in day-neutral, Junebearing, and everbearing strawberries. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 109:396-400.
Durner, E. F., E. B. Poling, and J. L. Maas. 2002. Recent advances in strawberry plug transplant technology. HortTechnology 12:545-550.
Freeman, J. A. and H. S. Pepin. 1971. Influence of plant size, date of digging and duration of cold storage on the growth of strawberry plants. Can. J. Plant Sci. 4:267-274.
Guttridge, C. G. and H. M. Anderson. 1973. The relationship between plant size and fruitfulness in strawberry in Scotland. Hort. Rev. 13:125-135.
Hancock, J. F. 1999. Strawberries. CAB International, Wallingfer, UK.
Heide, O. M. 1977. Photoperiod and temperature interactions in growth and flowering of strawberry. Physiol. Plant. 40:21-26.
Hochmuth, G., D. Cantliffe, C. Chandler, C. Stanley, E. Bish, E. Waldo, D. Legard, and J. Duval. 2006. Fruiting responses and economics of containerized and bare-root strawberry transplants established with different irrigation methods. HortTechnology 16:205-210.
Izhar, S. 1997. Infra short-day strawberry types. Acta Hort. 439:155-160.
Jahn, O. L. and M. N. Dana. 1970a. Crown and inflorescence development in the strawberry, Fragaria X Ananassa. Amer. J. Bot. 57:605-612.
Jahn, O. L. and M. N. Dana. 1970b. Effects of cultivar and plant age on vegetative growth of the strawberry, Fragaria x ananassa. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 57:993-999.
Kabir, Z., S. A. Fennimore, J. M. Duniway, F. N. Martin, G. T. Browne, C. Q. Winterbotton, H. A. Ajwa, B. B. Westerdahl, R. E. Goodhue, and M. J. Haar. 2005. Alternatives to methyl bromide for strawberry runner plant production. HortScience 40:1709-1715.
Konsin, M., I. Voipio, and P. Palonen. 2001. Influence of photoperiod and duration of short-day treatment on vegetative growth and flowering of strawberry (Fragaria X ananassa Duch.). J. Hort. Sci. & Biotechnol. 76:77-82.
Lamb, E. M., P. J. Stoffella, and C. Powell. 2003. Winter strawberry production in greenhouses using soilless substrates: an alternative to methyl bromide soil fumigation. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc 116:98-105.
Lieten, F. 2000. Recent advances in strawberry plug transplant technology. Acta Hort. 513:383-388.
Lieten, P. 2002. The use of cold stored plant material in central Europe. Acta Hort. 567:553-560.
Melvin, N. W. 1993. Dormancy and plant hardiness, p. 386. Temperate-zone pomology:physiology and culture. 3rd ed., Portland, Oreg.
Mochizuki, T. and M. Okimura. 1995. Recent trends on strawberry cultivars and production technology in Japan. Acta Hort. 761:107-114.
Moisander, J., M. Herrington, D. Hutton, and N. Greer. 2006. Effect of micro-propagation on the health status of strawberry planting material for commercial production of strawberry runners for Queensland. Acta Hort. 708:271-273.
Morrow, E. B. and G. M. Darrow. 1939. Relation of number of leaves in November to number of flowers the following spring in the Blakemore strawberry. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 37:571-573.
Nishiyama, M. and K. Kanahama. 2000. Effect of temperature and photoperiod on the development of inflorescences in everbearing strawberry (Fragaria X ananassa Duch.) plants. Acta Hort. 514:261-267.
Nishiyama, M. and K. Kanahama. 2002. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on flower bud initiation of day-neutral and everbearing strawberries. Acta Hort. 567:253-255.
Oda, Y. and T. Yanagi. 1993. Effect of climatic condition on the floral initiation at the runner tip of everbearing strawberry cultivar (Fragaria X ananassa Duch.). Acta Hort. 345:67-72.
Pertuzé, R., M. Barrueto, V. Diaz, and M. Gambardella. 2006. Evaluation of strawbery nursery management techniques to improve quality of plants. Acta Hort. 708:245-248.
Poling, E. B. and J. L. Maas. 2000. Strawberry plug transplant technology. Acta Hort. 513:393-401.
Scott, D. H. and F. J. Lawrence. 1975. Strawberries, p. 71-97. In: J. Janick and J. N. Moore (eds.). Advances in Fruit Breeding. West Lafayette, USA.
Serçe, S. and J. F. Hancock. 2005. The temperature and photoperiod regulation of flowering and runnering in the strawberies, Fragaria chiloensis, F. virginiana, and F. x ananassa. Scientia Hort. 103:167-177.
Shaw, D. V. and K. D. Larson. 1999. A meta-analysis of strawberry yield response to preplant soil fumigation with combinations of methyl bromide-chloropicrin and four alternative systems. HortScience 34:839-845.
Smeets, L. 1982. Effect of chilling on runner formation and flower initiation in the everbearing strawberry. Scientia Hort. 17:43-48.
Sproat, B. B., G. M. Darrow, and J. H. Beaumont. 1935. Relation of leaf area to berry production in the strawberry. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 33:389-392.
Swartz, H. J., G. J. Galletta, and R. H. Zimmerman. 1981. Field performance and phenotypic stability of tissue culture-propagated strawberries. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 106:667-673.
Szczygiel, A., K. Pierzga, and B. Borkowska. 2002. Performance of micropropagated strawberry plantlets after planting in the field. Acta Hort. 567:317-320.
Tafazoli, E. and B. Shaybany. 1978. Influence of nitrogen, deblossoming, and growth regulator treatments on growth, flowering, and runner production of the 'Gem' everbearing strawberry. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 103:372-374.
Taylor, D. R. 2002. The physiology of flowering in strawberry. Acta Hort. 567:245-251.
Yanagi, T. and Y. Oda. 1993. Effects of photoperiod and chilling on floral formation of intermediate types between June- and everbearing strawberries. Acta Hort. 348:339-346.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9444-
dc.description.abstract本試驗目的為在不影響草苺正常開花與生產的前提下,找出培育母株苗作次年用育苗母株的適期與方法。八月初定植之‘桃園三號’草苺,於九月初開始以誘植法與扦插法培育走莖苗,至二月底,誘植法平均每株成活的苗數,以早期(九月至十月中) 0.93株與中期(十月中至十一月底) 0.70株較多,晚期(十二月至一月) 0.25株較少;扦插法則以中期1.25株較多,晚期0.45株次之,早期0.25株較少。培育成活率三個時期皆以誘植法較高(早期90%、中期96%、晚期100%),而扦插法則早期較低(53%),中期次之(74%),晚期較高(91%)。母株苗的株高以扦插法繁殖者較高,葉片數以中期較多,根冠數無顯著差異,根冠高度以誘植法繁殖者較高,根冠直徑以扦插法繁殖者以早期較大,呈現愈後期愈小的趨勢,而誘植法根冠直徑各時期差異不顯著,但呈現愈後期愈大的趨勢,母株疏除的花序以早期及中期較多,晚期較少。迴歸分析顯示根冠高度及葉片數為估算母株重量的良好指標。兩種繁殖方法對栽培植株之開花時間影響不大,但以扦插法處理者定植後產生較多的走莖、花序與母株苗數,花序上的小花數較多。不同繁殖方法與時期之母株苗,定植後的走莖數及總繁殖苗數差異不顯著,但成活的種苗數在誘植法以早期培育者36.1株 (86.0株/m2)較多,中期者27.3株 (65.0株/m2)次之,晚期25.8株 (61.4株/m2)較少;扦插法同樣以早期培育者38.1株 (90.7株/m2)較多,中期者32.3株 (76.9株/m2)次之,晚期者27.4株 (65.2株/m2)較少,而商業等級的種苗數,亦有早期培育者較多,晚期培育者較少之趨勢。扦插法的育苗母株的種苗產生較多葉片數,但各時期差異不顯著;根冠高度及根冠直徑,則繁殖方法與時期的效應皆不顯著。迴歸分析顯示,母株苗定植前的自然株高及第四片展開葉的葉柄長,可能為預估育苗母株育苗表現的指標。試驗結果顯示,於栽培期同時培育母株苗作次年的育苗母株,以早期扦插法繁殖母株苗較佳,不僅有較多的苗供繁殖,且對栽培植株開花的影響較少,且在定植後能產生較多的成活苗數及商業等級苗數。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn order to find the suitable seasons and methods to propagate strawberry runner plant as next year’s nursery stock plants, ‘Tayouan No.3’ strawberry stock plants were planted at early August, and stock plantlets were propagated from Sep. to late Feb. from layering and cutting method. The stock plantlets propagation seasons were divided as early (Sep. to mid-Oct.), mid-term (mid-Oct. to Nov.), and late (Dec. to next Feb.). Mean survival stock plantlets per stock plant from layering method was higher at early with 0.93 plant and mid-term with 0.70 plant, and lower at late with 0.25 plant; as cutting method, it was higher at mid-term with 1.25 plants, next at late with 0.45 plant, and lower at early with 0.25 plant. Stock plantlets survival rate was higher from layering method in all season (early 90%, mid-term 96%, and late 100%) but from cutting method with lower at early (53%), medium at mid-term (74%), and higher at late (91%). Stock plantlets was higher from cutting method had higher plant height and crown height. No matter to method, stock plantlets at mid-term had the most leaves. Stock plantlets propagated from cutting method had larger crown size at early and significantly got smaller at mid-term and late. However, there was no significant difference among all season from layering method, but the crown size was gradually larger since early through late. Numbers of inflorescences removed was more at early and mid-term, less at late. Crown height and number of leaves were the better index to predicted stock plantlets weight by regression analysis. Propagation method had less effect on flowering time of cultivated plants, but those stock plantlets propagated from cutting method had more runners, inflorescences, total survival stock plantlets, and more small flowers on the inflorescence. Runners and total propagated runner plants generated by stock plants were non-significant among all seasons and methods, however, survival runner plants from stock plants by layering were more at early with 36.1 plants (86.0 plants /m2), next at mid-term with 27.3 plants (65.0 plants /m2), and less at late with 25.8 plants (61.4 plants / m2); stock plants by cutting method had the same tendency, more at early with 38.1 plants (90.7 plants /m2), next at mid-term with 32.3 plants (76.9 plants /m2), last at late with 27.4 plants (65.2 plants /m2). Commercial standard runner plants also had the same trend with more at early season and less at late season. Runner plants from stock plants with cutting had more leaves than by layering, but crown height and crown size were non-significant among stock plants from different methods and seasons. Plant height and the petiole of 4th expanded leaf of stock plantlets before planting would be the better index to predict the stock plants appearances in nursery by regression analysis. It was suggested to propagate stock plantlets as next year’s nursery stock plant by using cutting method at early, not only for less effect on flowering of cultivated plants and more runners for propagation, but also for more survival runner plants and commercial standard runner plants after planting at nursery.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T20:22:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-98-R95628109-1.pdf: 794225 bytes, checksum: 6e956e30d67b9914eed2cc507581dd65 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2009
en
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 、前言 1
第二章 、前人研究 2
一、 草苺的栽培與育苗技術 2
(一) 草苺的栽培系統 2
(二) 臺灣的草苺栽培週期 2
(三) 草苺育苗母株來源對種苗生產的影響 2
(四) 草苺的育苗技術 3
二、 草苺開花與走莖發生調節之策略 6
(一) 草苺結果特性的分類 6
(二) 溫度與光週對草苺開花與走莖生成的影響 7
(三) 草苺開花與走莖發生調節之策略 9
第三章 、材料與方法 11
一、 繁殖方法與時期對培育草苺母株苗的效率與品質之影響 12
(一) 材料預備與管理 12
(二) 試驗設計、處理與調查 12
(三) 溫度資料的來源、計算與整理 14
二、 培育草苺育苗母株之時期與方法對種苗增殖倍率的影響 14
(一) 材料準備與管理 14
(二) 試驗設計、操作與調查 15
(三) 溫度資料的來源、計算與整理 15
(四) 草苺母株苗外觀性狀與育苗表現相關模型 16
第四章 、結果與討論 17
一、 繁殖方法與時期對草苺培育母株苗的效率與品質之影響 17
(一) 母株苗培育法與時期之效率比較 17
(二) 繁殖時期與方法對母株苗品質的影響 18
(三) 繁殖母株苗之方法對草苺栽培植株生長之影響 21
二、 培育草苺母株之時期與方法對種苗增殖倍率的影響 24
(一) 不同育苗母株來源之走莖數與育苗數 24
(二) 不同育苗母株來源培育種苗之品質 27
(三) 母株苗定植前特徵與育成種苗數之迴歸分析 29
第五章 、結論 30
第六章 、參考文獻 64
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title草苺育苗母株培育期與方法對種苗增殖倍率的影響zh_TW
dc.titleEffects of Strawberry Stock Propagation Seasons and Methods on Runner Plant Productionen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear97-1
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.coadvisor李國譚(Kuo-Tan Li)
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee鄭正勇(Cheng-Yung Cheng)
dc.subject.keyword扦插,誘植,育苗,高溫頻度,低溫溫量,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordcutting,layering,nursery,high,temperature,frequency,chilling unit,en
dc.relation.page66
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2009-01-19
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept園藝學研究所zh_TW
Appears in Collections:園藝暨景觀學系

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
ntu-98-1.pdf775.61 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved