Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 電機資訊學院
  3. 資訊工程學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94445
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳彥仰zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorMike Y. Chenen
dc.contributor.author張宇承zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorYu-Cheng Changen
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-15T17:33:29Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-16-
dc.date.copyright2024-08-15-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.date.submitted2024-08-05-
dc.identifier.citationYifei Cheng, Yukang Yan, Xin Yi, Yuanchun Shi, and David Lindlbauer. 2021. SemanticAdapt: Optimization-Based Adaptation of Mixed Reality Layouts Leveraging Virtual-Physical Semantic Connections. In The 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Virtual Event, USA) (UIST ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 282–297. https://doi.org/10.1145/3472749.3474750
Ashley Colley, Juho Rantakari, and Jonna Häkkilä. 2014. Augmenting the Home to Remember: Initial User Perceptions. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication (Seattle, Washington) (UbiComp ’14 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1369–1372. https://doi.org/10.1145/2638728.2641717
Stephen DiVerdi, Daniel Nurmi, and Tobias Höllerer. 2003. ARWin-A Desktop Augmented Reality Window Manager. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR ’03). IEEE Computer Society, USA, 298.
Barrett Ens, Juan David Hincapié-Ramos, and Pourang Irani. 2014. Ethereal Planes: A Design Framework for 2D Information Space in 3D Mixed Reality Environments. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA) (SUI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2659766.2659769
Barrett Ens, Eyal Ofek, Neil Bruce, and Pourang Irani. 2015. Spatial constancy of surface-embedded layouts across multiple environments. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, United States, 65–68.
João Marcelo Evangelista Belo, Anna Maria Feit, Tiare Feuchtner, and Kaj Grønbæk. 2021. Xrgonomics: Facilitating the creation of ergonomic 3d interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11.
João Marcelo Evangelista Belo, Mathias N Lystbæk, Anna Maria Feit, Ken Pfeuer, Peter Kán, Antti Oulasvirta, and Kaj Grønbæk. 2022. Auit–the adaptive user interfaces toolkit for designing xr applications. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16.
Steven Feiner, Blair MacIntyre, Marcus Haupt, and Eliot Solomon. 1993. Windows on the world: 2D windows for 3D augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 6th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 145–155.
Andreas Fender, Philipp Herholz, Marc Alexa, and Jörg Müller. 2018. Optispace: Automated placement of interactive 3d projection mapping content. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, United States, 1–11.
Andreas Fender, David Lindlbauer, Philipp Herholz, Marc Alexa, and Jörg Müller. 2017. Heatspace: Automatic placement of displays by empirical analysis of user behavior. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, New York, NY, United States, 611–621.
Shogo Fukushima, Takeo Hamada, and Ari Hautasaari. 2020. Comparing World and Screen Coordinate Systems in Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays for Text Readability while Walking. In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). IEEE, USA, 649–658. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR50242.2020.00093
Ran Gal, Lior Shapira, Eyal Ofek, and Pushmeet Kohli. 2014. FLARE: Fast layout for augmented reality applications. In 2014 IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented reality (ISMAR). IEEE, IEEE, USA, 207–212.
Raiful Hasan and Ragib Hasan. 2022. Pedestrian safety using the Internet of Things and sensors: Issues, challenges, and open problems. Future Generation Computer Systems 134 (2022), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2022.03.036
Inc. Hepta Platforms. 2024. Heptabase, A note-taking tool for visual learning. https://heptabase.com/
Nate Hill. 2023. 3D WebView: the ultimate cross-platform web browser for Unity. https://developer.vuplex.com/ webview/overview
Samat Imamov, Daniel Monzel, and Wallace S Lages. 2020. Where to display? how interface position aects comfort and task switching time on glanceable interfaces. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, IEEE, USA, 851–858.
Apple Inc. 2023. Design considerations for vision and motion - WWDC23 - videos. https://developer.apple.com/ videos/play/wwdc2023/10078
Meta Inc. 2024. Cast to a screen with Meta Quest. https://www.meta.com/en-us/help/quest/articles/in-vr-experiences/ oculus-features/cast-with-quest/
Meta Inc. 2024. Interaction SDK Overview. https://developer.oculus.com/documentation/unity/unity-isdk-interaction- sdk-overview/
Shaun K. Kane, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Ian E. Smith. 2008. Getting o the Treadmill: Evaluating Walking User Interfaces for Mobile Devices in Public Spaces. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1145/1409240.1409253
Elisa Maria Klose, Nils Adrian Mack, Jens Hegenberg, and Ludger Schmidt. 2019. Text Presentation for Augmented Reality Applications in Dual-Task Situations. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, USA, 636–644. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8797992
Wallace S. Lages and Doug A. Bowman. 2019. Walking with Adaptive Augmented Reality Workspaces: Design and Usage Patterns. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Marina del Ray, California) (IUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301275.3302278
Hyunjin Lee, Sunyoung Bang, and Woontack Woo. 2023. Eects of coordinate system and position of AR notication while walking. Virtual Reality 27, 2 (2023), 829–848.
David Lindlbauer, Anna Maria Feit, and Otmar Hilliges. 2019. Context-aware online adaptation of mixed reality interfaces. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology. ACM, New York, NY, United States, 147–160.
Jiazhou Liu, Arnaud Prouzeau, Barrett Ens, and Tim Dwyer. 2020. Design and Evaluation of Interactive Small Multiples Data Visualisation in Immersive Spaces. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, USA, 588–597. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR46266.2020.00081
Feiyu Lu and Doug A. Bowman. 2021. Evaluating the Potential of Glanceable AR Interfaces for Authentic Everyday Uses. In 2021 IEEE Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, USA, 768–777. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR50410.2021.00104
Feiyu Lu, Shakiba Davari, Lee Lisle, Yuan Li, and Doug A. Bowman. 2020. Glanceable AR: Evaluating Information Access Methods for Head-Worn Augmented Reality. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, USA, 930–939. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR46266.2020.00113
Feiyu Lu and Yan Xu. 2022. Exploring Spatial UI Transition Mechanisms with Head-Worn Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 550, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102. 3517723
Allison Martin. 2006. Factors inuencing pedestrian safety: a literature review. TRL Wokingham, Berks, UK. PPR241.
Florian Müller, Joshua McManus, Sebastian Günther, Martin Schmitz, Max Mühlhäuser, and Markus Funk. 2019. Mind the Tap: Assessing Foot-Taps for Interacting with Head-Mounted Displays. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300707
Florian Müller, Martin Schmitz, Daniel Schmitt, Sebastian Günther, Markus Funk, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2020. Walk The Line: Leveraging Lateral Shifts of the Walking Path as an Input Modality for Head-Mounted Displays. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376852
Benjamin Nuernberger, Eyal Ofek, Hrvoje Benko, and Andrew D Wilson. 2016. Snaptoreality: Aligning augmented reality to the real world. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, United States, 1233–1244.
Joris Peereboom, Wilbert Tabone, Dimitra Dodou, and Joost de Winter. 2023. Head-locked, world-locked, or conformal diminished-reality? An examination of dierent AR solutions for pedestrian safety in occluded scenarios. ResearchGate ResearchGate (06 2023).
Xun Qian, Fengming He, Xiyun Hu, Tianyi Wang, Ananya Ipsita, and Karthik Ramani. 2022. Scalar: Authoring semantically adaptive augmented reality experiences in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, United States, 1–18.
Ashwin Ram and Shengdong Zhao. 2021. LSVP: Towards Eective On-the-go Video Learning Using Optical Head- Mounted Displays. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 5, 1, Article 30 (mar 2021), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448118
Rufat Rzayev, Paweł W Woźniak, Tilman Dingler, and Niels Henze. 2018. Reading on smart glasses: The eect of text position, presentation type and walking. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, United States, 1–9.
Marc Satkowski, Rufat Rzayev, Eva Goebel, and Raimund Dachselt. 2022. ABOVE & BELOW: Investigating Ceiling and Floor for Augmented Reality Content Placement. In 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). IEEE, USA, 518–527. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR55827.2022.00068
Philip Stoker, Andrea Garnkel-Castro, Meleckidzedeck Khayesi, Wilson Odero, Martin N Mwangi, Margie Peden, and Reid Ewing. 2015. Pedestrian safety and the built environment: a review of the risk factors. Journal of Planning Literature 30, 4 (2015), 377–392.
Nicholas DA Thomas, James D Gardiner, Robin H Crompton, and Rebecca Lawson. 2020. Look out: an exploratory study assessing how gaze (eye angle and head angle) and gait speed are inuenced by surface complexity. PeerJ 8 (2020), e8838.
Maarten Van Someren, Yvonne F Barnard, and J Sandberg. 1994. The think aloud method: a practical approach to modelling cognitive. London: AcademicPress 11 (1994), 29–41.
Leena Ventä-Olkkonen, Jonna Häkkilä, and Kaisa Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila. 2014. Exploring the Augmented Home Window: User Perceptions of the Concept. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Melbourne, Victoria, Australia) (MUM ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677972.2677994
Jacob O Wobbrock, Leah Findlater, Darren Gergle, and James J Higgins. 2011. The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 143–146.
Chen Zhou, Katherine Fennedy, Felicia Fang-Yi Tan, Shengdong Zhao, and Yurui Shao. 2023. Not All Spacings are Created Equal: The Eect of Text Spacings in On-the-go Reading Using Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 720, 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548. 3581430
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94445-
dc.description.abstract行動電話使得用戶能在不同的移動情境中瀏覽資訊。然而,在高移動性情境如步行時,手機存在多種使用上的挑戰,特別是安全性和螢幕尺寸有限的問題。雖然擴增實境(AR)被提出來解決這些問題,但先前的研究除了在文字可讀性和通知設計以外,尚未在真實的步行條件下探討 AR 介面設計。本文呈現了首次在野外步行時探索AR瀏覽介面設計及其延伸使用。我們首先在不同環境中與 12 位 UI 設計師進行設計會議,設計了三種應用程式類型:文字型、影片型和混合型的視窗大小、距離、不透明度、錨定類型和位置。結果顯示,交通程度顯著影響設計的視窗大小,而內容類型顯著影響視窗大小、距離、不透明度和垂直位置。為了獲取更多的真實世界使用見解,我們進行了為期多日的觀察性研究,包含 5 名參與者,並觀察到參與者平均每 3.3 分鐘切換一次視窗佈局,其動機包括安全性考量和不同視覺注意力的需要。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractMobile phones have enabled users to browse information in varying mobility contexts. For high-mobility settings such as walking, however, phones pose several usability challenges, particularly safety and limited screen sizes. While Augmented Reality (AR) has been proposed to address these issues, prior work has yet to investigate AR interface design in real-world walking conditions beyond text readability and notification design. This paper presents the first exploration of AR browsing interface design and extended usage while walking in the wild. We first conducted design sessions with 12 UI designers while walking in varied environments to design the window size, distance, opacity, anchor type, and placement for three categories of apps: text, video, and mixed content. Results show that traffic level significantly affects the designed window size, whereas content type significantly affects window size, distance, opacity, and vertical placement. To gain further insights from real-world usage, we conducted a multi-day observational study with 5 participants and observed that participants on average switched among window layouts every 3.3 minutes, for reasons such as safety and the level of extended visual attention.en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-15T17:33:29Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-08-15T17:33:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝 ii
摘要 iii
Abstract iv
1 Introduction 1
2 Related Work 4
2.1 WalkingUserInterface 4
2.2 Augmented Reality Layout Placement and Adjustment 6
3 AR Window Layout Design Parameters 8
4 User Study 1: Investigating the effect of traffic levels and content types 10
4.1 Design and Methodology 10
4.1.1 Content type 11
4.1.2 Traffic Levels 12
4.2 System Implementation 12
4.3 Participants and Procedures 14
4.4 Study Conditions 15
4.5 Study Results 15
4.5.1 Perceived size 16
4.5.2 Distance 17
4.5.3 Opacity 17
4.5.4 Placement in FOV 18
4.5.5 AnchoringMode 19
4.5.6 Participants’ Primary Goal and Design Consideration 19
4.6 Discussion of Research Questions 20
4.6.1 How does application content type affect interface design? 20
4.6.2 How does surrounding traffic level affect interface design? 21
5 Common Design Patterns 23
5.1 Quantitative Result 24
5.2 Qualitative Result. 24
5.2.1 Safety Consideration 25
5.2.2 Focus Consideration 25
6 User Study 2: Observations from extended usage in real-world walking contexts 27
6.1 System Design and Implementation 27
6.2 Study Design, Procedure, and Setup 28
6.3 Study Results 29
6.3.1 Mode-switching behaviors 29
6.3.2 DesignDifferencesBetweenModes 30
7 Discussion 33
7.1 AR experience with different content types on-the-go 33
7.2 AR experience with different placement on-the-go 34
7.3 Design Recommendations 35
7.4 Limitations and Future Work 36
7.4.1 Study Design Limitations 36
7.4.2 Technical Limitations 37
8 Conclusion 39
Bibliography 40
Appendices 46
Result of Statistical Test and Descriptive Statistics 47
.1 Traffic Level 47
.2 Content Type 47
Window properties of clustering result 49
Heatmaps of all participants’ designs from Study 1 50
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject步行使用者介面zh_TW
dc.subject擴增實境zh_TW
dc.subject使用者介面設計zh_TW
dc.subjectUser Interface Designen
dc.subjectWalking User Interfaceen
dc.subjectAugemted Realityen
dc.title設計擴增實境瀏覽介面於現實步行場景之經驗zh_TW
dc.titleExperience from Designing Augmented Reality Browsing Interfaces for Real-world Walking Scenariosen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear112-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee鄭龍磻;余能豪;蔡欣叡zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeLung-Pan Cheng ;Neng-Hao Yu;Hsin-Ruey Tsaien
dc.subject.keyword步行使用者介面,擴增實境,使用者介面設計,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordWalking User Interface,Augemted Reality,User Interface Design,en
dc.relation.page50-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202402365-
dc.rights.note未授權-
dc.date.accepted2024-08-08-
dc.contributor.author-college電機資訊學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept資訊工程學系-
顯示於系所單位:資訊工程學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-112-2.pdf
  未授權公開取用
11.79 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved