請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94444完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭龍磻 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Lung-Pan Cheng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張庭逸 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Ting-Yi Chang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-15T17:33:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-16 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-08-15 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-08-09 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1] P. Baudisch, H. Pohl, S. Reinicke, E. Wittmers, P. Lühne, M. Knaust, S. Köhler, P. Schmidt, and C. Holz. Imaginary reality gaming: ball games without a ball. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST ’13, page 405–410, New York, NY, USA, 2013. Association for Computing Machinery.
[2] bHaptics. bhaptics tactsuit x40, 2021. [3] F. Biocca. The Cyborg’s Dilemma: Progressive Embodiment in Virtual Environ- ments [1]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2):JCMC324, 09 1997. [4] V.BraunandV.Clarke.Usingthematicanalysisinpsychology.QualitativeResearch in Psychology, 3(2):77–101, 2006. [5] A. Cahen and M. Tacca. Linking perception and cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 2013. [6] L.-P. Cheng, Y. Chen, Y.-H. Peng, and C. Holz. Reality rifts: Wonder-ful interfaces by disrupting perceptual causality. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’23, New York, NY, USA, 2023. Asso- ciation for Computing Machinery. [7] A. R. Cheraghi, S. Shahzad, and K. Graffi. Past, present, and future of swarm robotics. In Intelligent Systems and Applications: Proceedings of the 2021 Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys) Volume 3, pages 190–233. Springer, 2022. [8] J.S.B.Evans.Intwominds:dual-processaccountsofreasoning.Trendsincognitive sciences, 7(10):454–459, 2003. [9] J. S. B. T. Evans. On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 13(4):321–339, 2007. [10] J. S. B. T. Evans and K. E. Stanovich. Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3):223–241, 2013. PMID: 26172965. [11] S. Goldstein, J. Campbell, and T. Mowry. Programmable matter. Computer, 38(6):99–101, 2005. [12] T. Hartmann and M. Hofer. I know it is not real (and that matters) media awareness vs. presence in a parallel processing account of the vr experience. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 3, 2022. [13] M. Hofer, T. Hartmann, A. Eden, R. Ratan, and L. Hahn. The role of plausibility in the experience of spatial presence in virtual environments. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 1, 2020. [14] M.E.LatoschikandC.Wienrich.Congruenceandplausibility,notpresence:Pivotal conditions for xr experiences and effects, a novel approach. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 3, 2022. [15] K. M. Lee. Presence, Explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1):27–50, 01 2006. [16] M. Lombard and T. Ditton. At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2):JCMC321, 09 1997. [17] Meta. First enounters, 2023. [18] P. Milgram and F. Kishino. A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 77(12):1321–1329, 1994. [19] M. Minsky. Telepresence. 1980. [20] M. Nunes. Jean baudrillard in cyberspace: Internet, virtuality, and postmodernity. Style, pages 314–327, 1995. [21] C. S. Oh, J. N. Bailenson, and G. F. Welch. A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, 2018. [22] M. I. Posner, M. J. Nissen, and R. M. Klein. Visual dominance: an information- processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological review, 83(2):157, 1976. [23] P. A. Rauschnabel, R. Felix, C. Hinsch, H. Shahab, and F. Alt. What is xr? towards a framework for augmented and virtual reality. Computers in Human Behavior, 133:107289, 2022. [24] L. Ropolyi. Virtuality and reality—toward a representation ontology. Philosophies, 1(1):40–54, 2015. [25] T. W. Schubert. A New Conception of Spatial Presence: Once Again, with Feeling. Communication Theory, 19(2):161–187, 04 2009. [26] R. Skarbez, F. P. Brooks, Jr., and M. C. Whitton. A survey of presence and related concepts. ACM Comput. Surv., 50(6), nov 2017. [27] R. Skarbez, M. Smith, and M. C. Whitton. Revisiting milgram and kishino’s reality- virtuality continuum. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 2, 2021. [28] M. Slater. A note on presence terminology. Presence connect, 3(3):1–5, 2003. [29] M. Slater. Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1535):3549–3557, 2009. [30] M. Slater. Immersion and the illusion of presence in virtual reality. British Journal of Psychology, 109(3):431–433, 2018. [31] M. Slater, D. Banakou, A. Beacco, J. Gallego, F. Macia-Varela, and R. Oliva. A sep- arate reality: An update on place illusion and plausibility in virtual reality. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 3, 2022. [32] M.Slater,A.Steed,J.McCarthy,andF.Maringelli.Theinfluenceofbodymovement on subjective presence in virtual environments. Human Factors, 40(3):469–477, 1998. PMID: 9849105. [33] M. Slater and S. Wilbur. A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(6):603–616, 12 1997. [34] S. A. Sloman. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological bulletin, 119(1):3, 1996. [35] E. R. Smith and J. DeCoster. Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychol- ogy: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and social psychology review, 4(2):108–131, 2000. [36] C. Stapleton, C. Hughes, M. Moshell, P. Micikevicius, and M. Altman. Applying mixed reality to entertainment. Computer, 35(12):122–124, 2002. [37] J. Steuer, F. Biocca, M. R. Levy, et al. Defining virtual reality: Dimensions deter- mining telepresence. Communication in the age of virtual reality, 33:37–39, 1995. [38] P. Touzalin-Chretien, S. Ehrler, and A. Dufour. Dominance of Vision over Proprio- ception on Motor Programming: Evidence from ERP. Cerebral Cortex, 20(8):2007– 2016, 12 2009. [39] M. Usoh, K. Arthur, M. C. Whitton, R. Bastos, A. Steed, M. Slater, and F. P. Brooks Jr. Walking> walking-in-place> flying, in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pages 359–364, 1999. [40] P.-Y. C. Wang, R. Rajesh, N. Y. X. Lee, A. S. S. Loose, N. Overdevest, N. Se- mertzidis, and F. Mueller. Dreamception: Towards understanding the design of targeted lucid dream mediation. In Extended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA ’24, New York, NY, USA, 2024. Association for Computing Machinery. [41] P. Wason and J. Evans. Dual processes in reasoning? Cognition, 3(2):141–154, 1974. [42] W. Wirth, T. Hartmann, S. Böcking, P. Vorderer, C. Klimmt, H. Schramm, T. Saari, J. Laarni, N. Ravaja, F. R. Gouveia, F. Biocca, A. Sacau, L. Jäncke, T. Baumgartner, and P. Jäncke. A process model of the formation of spatial presence experiences. Media Psychology, 9(3):493–525, 2007. [43] B.G.WitmerandM.J.Singer.MeasuringPresenceinVirtualEnvironments:A Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3):225– 240, 06 1998. [44] X. Xia, C. M. Spadaccini, and J. R. Greer. Responsive materials architected in space and time. Nature Reviews Materials, 7(9):683–701, 2022. [45] P. Zahorik and R. L. Jenison. Presence as being-in-the-world. Presence, 7(1):78–89, 1998. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94444 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 傳統上，對於使用者在沉浸式環境中主觀體驗的研究，通常集中於存在感，也就是身處於虛擬環境的感覺。我們建議將認知和感知分開，以便在現實與虛擬之間界限的日益模糊的未來，更好的理解更多樣化沉浸式體驗中使用者的主觀體驗。我們以「存在感」來描述使用者的感知體驗，並引入「認知狀態」，即指使用者相信自己正在與物理世界或虛擬世界互動的信念，來描述使用者的認知系統。我們假設使用者的認知狀態會在沉浸式體驗中轉變。我們設計了一個包含一系列高和低保真度感官線索的30分鐘密室逃脫體驗，來探究使用者的認知轉變及其誘發因素。通過對36名參與者的主題分析結果，我們概述了影響使用者認知轉變的六個因素：虛擬可信度、空間意識、感知、保真度、期望和任務順序，並提出了六條在設計沉浸式體驗上，建立使用者虛擬認知狀態的原則。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Traditionally, the study of users’ subjective experiences in immersive environments has typically focused on presence, which is the sense of being there. Considering the evolving forms of immersive experiences and the increasingly blurred boundaries between reality and virtuality, we suggest separating cognition and perception to better understand users’ subjective experiences. We retain “presence” to describe users’ perceptual experiences and introduce “cognitive state,” i.e., believing in either reality or virtuality, to describe the users’ cognitive systems. We hypothesize that users’ cognitive states will transition during immersive experiences. We design an experiment consisting of a series of sensory cues with high and low fidelity in a 30-minute escape room experience to probe the user’s cognitive transitions and the inducing factors. From the thematic analysis result of 36 participants, we outline the six factors affecting the user’s cognitive transitions: virtual plausibility, spatial awareness, sensation, fidelity, expectation, and task order, offering six guidelines for establishing users’ virtual cognitive state in an immersive experience. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-15T17:33:10Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-15T17:33:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgements ii
摘要 iii Abstract iv Contents v List of Figures viii List of Tables x Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Related Work 4 2.1 VR Framework 4 2.2 Presence 5 2.3 Dual Process Theory 6 2.4 Blurring Boundaries Between Reality and Virtuality 7 Chapter 3 From Presence to Cognitive State 9 Chapter 4 Method 13 4.1 Development Process of Experiment Design 13 4.2 Apparatus 15 4.3 Procedure 16 4.4 Fidelity of Sensory Cues and Tasks 19 4.5 Questionnaire and Interview 23 4.6 Participants 23 4.7 Data Analysis 24 Chapter 5 Results 25 5.1 Virtual Scenario 26 5.1.1 Impact of sensory cues on virtual scenario 27 5.1.2 Impact of emotions on virtual scenario 28 5.1.3 Impact of cognitive allocation on virtual scenario 28 5.1.4 The interaction between virtual scenario and fidelity 28 5.1.5 Unusual experiences 29 5.2 Spatial Awareness 30 5.2.1 Developing spatial awareness of virtual environment 30 5.2.2 Connection to real world 31 5.3 Sensory 32 5.3.1 Vision 32 5.3.2 Other cues 33 5.3.3 Providing sensory cues through devices 33 5.3.4 Creating interactability 34 5.3.5 Fidelity 35 5.4 Expectation 36 5.4.1 Sensory cues match/mismatch expectation 36 5.4.2 Task order 37 Chapter 6 Discussion 38 6.1 Virtual Plausibility 38 6.1.1 Unusual experience 39 6.1.2 Believing sensory cues come from virtual world 40 6.1.3 Allocate more users’ attention to virtual scenario 40 6.2 Spatial Awareness 40 6.3 Sensation 41 6.4 Fidelity 42 6.5 Expectation 43 6.6 Order of Tasks 43 6.7 Summary of Guidelines 44 6.8 Study Limitations 45 Chapter 7 Conclusion 46 References 47 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 認知 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 臨場感 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 沉浸式體驗 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 虛擬實境 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Presence | en |
| dc.subject | Immersive Experience | en |
| dc.subject | Cognition | en |
| dc.subject | Virtual Reality | en |
| dc.title | 理解沉浸式體驗中使用者的認知狀態轉變 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Living a Fantasy: Understanding the User's Cognitive State Transitions in Immersive Experience | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 詹力韋;程芙茵 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Li-Wei Chan;Fu-Yin Cherng | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 認知,臨場感,沉浸式體驗,虛擬實境, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Cognition,Presence,Immersive Experience,Virtual Reality, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 52 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202402686 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-11 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 電機資訊學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊工程學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 資訊工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf | 2.29 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。