請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94321完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 王皇玉 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Huang-Yu Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 鄭丰 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Feng Cheng | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-15T16:48:26Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-16 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-08-15 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-08-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
王皇玉（2018），〈跟蹤糾纏行為之處罰：以德國法制為中心〉，《臺大法學論叢》，47卷4期，頁2347-2392。 王皇玉（2020），〈跟蹤糾纏行為犯罪化之趨勢〉，《刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集》，22期，頁293-310。 王皇玉（2023），〈跟蹤騷擾防制法解析〉，《高雄律師會訊》，第15屆第112.07-09期，頁84-92。 吳珮瑀（2019），〈消沉經驗與自體疾患－Kohut自體心理學之應用〉，《應用心理研究》，70期，頁198-205。 法思齊（2013），〈美國反跟追法（Anti-Stalking Law）之研究──兼論我國相關法制之建構〉，《東吳法律學報》，24卷3期，頁1-47。 法思齊（2017），〈反跟追法之新挑戰──美國網路跟追法（Cyberstalking Law）之初探〉，《月旦刑事法評論》，5期，頁45-48。 林山田、林東茂、林燦璋、賴擁連（2020），《犯罪學》，修訂6版，三民。 林宜謙，〈德國與我國跟蹤騷擾法制之比較分析〉，《軍法專刊》，68卷4期，2022年8月，頁116-135。 林琬珊（2022），〈跟蹤騷擾防制法評析－過與不及的矛盾衝突〉，《台灣法律人》，11期，頁140-169。 紀欣（2009），《美國家事法》，修訂2版，五南。 張甘妹（1980），《犯罪學原論》，修訂再版，三民。 許福生（2018），《犯罪學與犯罪預防》，修訂2版，元照。 許福生（2021），〈跟蹤騷擾防制法爭點之評析〉，《警政論叢》，21期，頁1-52。 許福生（2022），《跟蹤騷擾防制法解析》，五南。 許華孚、吳吉裕、李宗憲、賴昱禔（2016），〈世界各國犯罪防治研究發展經驗之比較研究〉，《刑事政策與犯罪防治研究專刊》，11期，頁21-38。 黃壬聰（2000），〈尾隨的探討─尾隨者的類型和方法〉，收於林燦璋（編），《犯罪剖繪（二）─連續殺人犯罪偵查》，頁124-143，中央警察大學出版社。 黃士軒（2017），〈概觀日本糾纏騷擾行為罪的處罰現況〉，《月旦刑事法評論》，5期，頁89-111。 黃士軒（2024），〈我國跟蹤騷擾行為罪的保護法益〉，《臺大法學論叢》，53卷2期，頁517-579。 黃翠紋（2020），〈跟蹤騷擾防制法之評析與展望〉，《刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集》，22期，頁255-291。 黃翠紋（2020），〈跟蹤騷擾案件暴力風險因素與評估量表之研析〉，《刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集》，23期，頁429-460。 楊廼軒（2023），〈論「跟蹤騷擾行為」入罪化爭議〉，《刑事政策與犯罪防治研究專刊》，35期，頁109-160。 廖宜寧（2022），〈由行為不法角度建構跟蹤騷擾罪之刑罰正當性〉，《興大法學》，32期，頁107-156。 鄭子薇（2023），〈談跟蹤騷擾防制法「與性或性別有關」之構成要件──從性別的四個面向出發〉，《月旦律評》，14期，頁51-59。 盧映潔（2017），《刑法分則新論》，修訂12版，新學林。 American Psychiatric Association（著），台灣精神醫學會（譯）（2014），《DSM-5精神疾病診斷準則手冊（修訂版）》，合記圖書。 Elliot Aronson（著），邢占軍（譯）（2007），《社會性動物》，9版，華東師範大學出版社（簡體字版）。 香港法律改革委員會報告書（2000），《纏擾行為研究報告書》，載於：https://www.hkreform.gov.hk/tc/docs/rstalk-c.pdf。 立法院法制局（2021），《跟蹤騷擾防制法草案評估報告》，載於：https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/ashx/File.ashx?FilePath=~/File/Attach/209086/File_1659586.pdf。 內政部警政署（2022），《跟蹤騷擾防制法施行成效檢討與分析》，載於：https://www.npa.gov.tw/ch/app/data/doc?module=wg032&detailNo=1192738981213638656&type=s。 英文部分 Allnutt, S., Samuels, A., & Taylor, G. (2009). The harassment and stalking of plastic surgeons by their patients in Australasia. ANZ journal of surgery, 79(7-8), 533–536. Bureau of Justice Assistance, Overview of Crime Analysis, https://bja.ojp.gov/sites/g/ files/xyckuh186/files/media/document/OverviewofCrimeAnalysis.pdf. Bacon D. (1990). When fans turn into fanatics, nervous celebs call for help from security expert Gavin De Becker. People, 33, 103-106. Baddam B. (2018). TECHNOLOGY AND ITS DANGER TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE VICTIMS: HOW DID HE FIND ME?. Journal of Science and Technology, 28, 73-93. Baum, K., Catalano, S., & Rose, K. (2009a). Stalking victimization in the United States: National crime victimization survey. PsycEXTRA Dataset. Brady, P. Q., Reyns, B. W., Landhuis, J., & Griffin, V. W. (2023). APPlied stalking: What the next generation of stalking victims consider to be ‘stalking’ and why victims report their experiences to the police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 84, 1–11. Belfrage, H., & Strand, S. (2009). Validation of the Stalking Assessment and Management Checklist (SAM) in Law Enforcement: A Prospective Study of 153 Cases of Stalking in Two Swedish Police Counties. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 11(1), 67-76. Brooks, N., Petherick, W., Kannan, A., Stapleton, P., & Davidson, S. (2021). Understanding female-perpetrated stalking. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 8(3), 65–76. Campbell, J., & Moore, R. (2011). Self-perceptions of stalking victimization and impacts on victim reporting. Police Practice & Research: An International Journal, 12(6), 506–517. Carabellese, F., Candelli, C., La Tegola, D., Alfarano, E., & Catanesi, R. (2013). Female same gender stalking: a brief review of the literature and case report. Forensic science international, 228(1-3), e6–e10. Carter, T. B. (2016) Local, State, and Federal Responses to Stalking: Are Anti-Stalking Laws Effective? William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law, 22, 333-391. Davis, J. A., & Chipman, M. A. (1997). Stalkers and other obsessional types: a review and forensic psychological typology of those who stalk. Journal of clinical forensic medicine, 4(4), 166–172. Dressing, H., Henn, F. A., & Gass, P. (2002). Stalking behavior - an overview of the problem and a case report of male-to-male stalking during delusional disorder. Psychopathology, 35(5), 313–318. Dressing, H., Foerster, K., & Gass, P. (2011). Are stalkers disordered or criminal? Thoughts on the psychopathology of stalking. Psychopathology, 44(5), 277–282. Dunlap, E. E., Lynch, K. R., Jewell, J. A., Wasarhaley, N. E., & Golding, J. M. (2015). Participant gender, stalking myth acceptance, and gender role stereotyping in perceptions of intimate partner stalking: A structural equation modeling approach. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(3), 234–253. DuPont-Morales, M. A. (1999). De-Gendering Predatory Violence: The Female Stalker. Humanity & Society, 23(4), 366-379. Finnegan, H. A., Timmons Fritz, P. A., & Horrobin, B. (2018). Differential Effects of Gender on Canadian Police Officers’ Perceptions of Stalking. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(4), 468-482. Forell, C.A., Making the Argument that Stalking is Gendered. Journal of Law & Social Challenges, 8, 52-110(2007). Gentile, S. R., Asamen, J. K., Harmell, P. H., & Weathers, R. (2002). The stalking of psychologists by their clients. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33(5), 490–494. Guy, R. (1993). The Nature and Constitutionality of Stalking Laws. Vanderbilt Law Review, 46, 991-1029. Gilligan, M.J. (1992). Stalking the Stalker: Developing New Laws to Thwart Those Who Terrorize Others. Georgia Law Review, 27(1), 285-342. Hall, D. M., (1998). The victims of stalking. In J. R. Meloy (Ed.), The psychology of stalking: Clinical and forensic perspectives (pp. 113–137). Academic Press. Harmon, R. B., Rosner, R., & Owens, H. (1995). Obsessional harassment and erotomania in a criminal court population. Journal of forensic sciences, 40(2), 188–196. Haas, B. B. (1994). The Formation and Viability of Anti-Stalking Laws, Villanova Law Review, 39(5), 1387-1415. Jordan, C. E., Logan, T. K., Walker, R., & Nigoff, A. (2003). Stalking: An examination of the criminal justice response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(2), 148–165. Kamphuis, J. H., & Emmelkamp, P. M. (2000). Stalking--a contemporary challenge for forensic and clinical psychiatry. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 176, 206–209. Klein, A., Salomon, A., Huntington, N., Dubois, J., & Lang, D. (2012). Statewide Study of Stalking and Its Criminal Justice Response in Rhode Island, Archival Version. Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., & Lyon, D. R. (2002). Risk assessment of stalkers: Some problems and possible solutions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(5), 590–616. Logan, T. K., & Landhuis, J. (2024). Acquaintance stalking victim experiences of work interference, resource loss, and help-seeking. International Review of Victimology, 30(1), 50-69. Lambert, E. G., Smith, B., Geistman, J., Cluse-Tolar, T., & Jiang, S. (2013). Do men and women differ in their perceptions of stalking: an exploratory study among college students. Violence and victims, 28(2), 195–209. Lynch, K. R., & Logan, T. K. (2015). Police Officers' Attitudes and Challenges With Charging Stalking. Violence and victims, 30(6), 1037–1048. Malsch, M. (2007). Stalking: Do criminalization and punishment help? Punishment & Society, 9(2), 201-209. Malsch, M., Groenen, A., de Keijser, J., & Vervaeke, G. (2009). Dealing with stalking: Police intervention or court decision? International Review of Victimology, 16(1), 51–65. Mastronardi, V. M., Pomilla, A., Ricci, S., & D'Argenio, A. (2013). Stalking of psychiatrists: psychopathological characteristics and gender differences in an Italian sample. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 57(5), 526-543. Mathieson, A.-R. (2003). Every Move You Make: How Stories Shape the Law of Stalking. Michigan Law Review, 101(6), 1589–1601. Mazingo, A. (2014). The Intersection of Dominance Feminism and Stalking Laws, Northwestern Journal of Law & Society, 9, 335-359. McCart, M. R., Smith, D. W., & Sawyer, G. K. (2010). Help seeking among victims of crime: a review of the empirical literature. Journal of traumatic stress, 23(2), 198–206. McEwan, T., Mullen, P. E., & Purcell, R. (2007). Identifying risk factors in stalking: a review of current research. International journal of law and psychiatry, 30(1), 1–9. McEwan, T. E., Mullen, P. E., & MacKenzie, R. (2009). A study of the predictors of persistence in stalking situations. Law and human behavior, 33(2), 149–158. McEwan, T. E., & Strand, S. (2013). The role of psychopathology in stalking by adult strangers and acquaintances. The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 47(6), 546–555. McFarlane, J. M., Campbell, J. C., Wilt, S., Sachs, C. J., Ulrich, Y., & Xu, X. (1999). Stalking and intimate partner femicide. Homicide Studies: An Interdisciplinary & International Journal, 3(4), 300–316. McIvor, R. J., & Petch, E. (2006). Stalking of mental health professionals: an underrecognised problem. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 188, 403–404. Meloy, J. R., & Gothard, S. (1995). Demographic and clinical comparison of obsessional followers and offenders with mental disorders. The American journal of psychiatry, 152(2), 258–263. Meloy, J. R. (Ed.). (1998). The psychology of stalking: Clinical and forensic perspectives. Academic Press. Meloy J. R. (1999). Stalking. An old behavior, a new crime. The Psychiatric clinics of North America, 22(1), 85–99. Meloy, J. R., Davis, B., & Lovette, J. (2001). Risk factors for violence among stalkers. Journal of Threat Assessment, 1(1), 3–16. Meloy, J. R., (2003). Pathologies of attachment, violence, and criminality. In A. M. Goldstein (Ed.), Handbook of psychology: Forensic psychology, 11, (pp. 509–526). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. Meloy, J. R., & Boyd, C. (2003). Female stalkers and their victims. The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31(2), 211–219. Meloy J. R. (2007). Stalking: the state of the science. Criminal behaviour and mental health : CBMH, 17(1), 1–7. Ménard, K. S., & Cox, A. K. (2016). Stalking victimization, labeling, and reporting: Findings from the NCVS stalking victimization supplement. Violence Against Women, 22(6), 671–691. Miller, N. (2001). Stalking Investigation, Law, Public Policy, and Criminal Prosecution as Problem Solver. In J. A. Davis (Ed.), Stalking Crimes and Victim Protection (pp. 387-425). CRC Press. Morgan, R. E. & Truman, J. L. (2022). Stalking victimization, 2019. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Morgan, R. K. (2010). Students stalking faculty: Real and imagined relationships. Sexuality & Culture: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 14(1), 5–16. Morville, D. A. (1993). Stalking Laws: Are They Solutions for More Problems? Washington University Law Quarterly, 71(3), 921-935. Mullen, P. E., & Pathé, M. (1994). The pathological extensions of love. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 165(5), 614–623. Mullen, P. E., Pathé, M., Purcell, R., & Stuart, G. W. (1999). Study of stalkers. The American journal of psychiatry, 156(8), 1244–1249. Mullen, P. E., Pathé, M., & Purcell, R. (2000). Stalkers and their victims. Cambridge University Press. Mullen, P. E., Mackenzie, R., Ogloff, J. R., Pathé, M., McEwan, T., & Purcell, R. (2006). Assessing and managing the risks in the stalking situation. The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 34(4), 439–450. Paul E. Mullen, & Michele Pathé, Stalkers and their victims, Cambridge University Press (2009). Ngo, F. T. (2019). Stalking: an examination of the correlates of subsequent police responses. Policing: An International Journal, 42(3), 362-375. Nwachukwu, I., Agyapong, V., Quinlivan, L., Tobin, J., & Malone, K. (2012). Psychiatrists' experiences of stalking in Ireland: Prevalence and characteristics. The Psychiatrist, 36(3), 89–93. Owens, J. G. (2017). A Gender-Biased Definition: Unintended Impacts of the Fear Requirement in Stalking Victimization. Crime & Delinquency, 63(11), 1339-1362. Pathé, M., Mullen, P. E., & Purcell, R. (2001). Management of victims of stalking. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 7(6), 399–406. Pathé, M. T., Mullen, P. E., & Purcell, R. (2000). Same-gender stalking. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 28(2), 191–197. Perez, C. (1993). Stalking: When does obsession become a crime? American Journal of Criminal Law, 20, 263-280. Purcell, R., Pathé, M., & Mullen, P. E. (2001). A study of women who stalk. The American journal of psychiatry, 158(12), 2056–2060. Purcell, R., Pathé, M., & Mullen, P. E. (2002). The prevalence and nature of stalking in the Australian community. The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 36(1), 114–120. Purcell, R., Moller, B., Flower, T., & Mullen, P. E. (2009). Stalking among juveniles. British Journal of Psychiatry, 194(5), 451–455. Purcell, R., Pathé, M., & Mullen, P. (2010). Gender differences in stalking behaviour among juveniles. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 21(4), 555–568. Reno, J., Robinson, L., Brennan, N., & Schwartz K. (1998). Stalking and Domestic Violence: The Third Annual Report to Congress Under the Violence Against Women Act, National Institute of Justice Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Rosenfeld, B., Galietta, M., Foellmi, M., Coupland, S., Turner, Z., Stern, S., Wijetunga, C., Gerbrandij, J., & Ivanoff, A. (2019). Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) for the treatment of stalking offenders: A randomized controlled study. Law and human behavior, 43(4), 319–328. Schwartz-Watts, D., & Morgan, D. W. (1998). Violent versus nonviolent stalkers. The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 26(2), 241–245. Salame, L.(1993). A National Survey of Stalking Laws: A Legislative Trend Comes to the Aid of Domestic Violence Victims and Others. Suffolk University Law Review, 27(67), 67–111. Sheridan, L., Gillett, R., & Davies, G. (2000). ‘Stalking’ – Seeking the victim’s perspective. Psychology, Crime & Law, 6(4), 267–280. Sheridan, L., & Lyndon, A. E. (2012). The influence of prior relationship, gender, and fear on the consequences of stalking victimization. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 66(5-6), 340–350. Sheridan, L. P., North, A. C., & Scott, A. J. (2014). Experiences of stalking in same-sex and opposite-sex contexts. Violence and victims, 29(6), 1014–1028. Smith, S. S., O’Toole, M. E., & Hare, R. D. (2012). Perspective: The predator - when the stalker is a psychopath. FBI. https://leb.fbi.gov/articles/perspective/perspective-the-predator-when-the-stalker-is-a-psychopath Spitzberg, B. H. (2002). The Tactical Topography of Stalking Victimization and Management. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 3, 261-288. Storey, J. E., Hart, S. D., Meloy, J. R., & Reavis, J. A. (2009). Psychopathy and stalking. Law and human behavior, 33(3), 237–246. Strand, S., & McEwan, T. E. (2011). Same-gender stalking in Sweden and Australia. Behavioral sciences & the law, 29(2), 202–219. Strand, S., & McEwan, T. E. (2012). Violence among female stalkers. Psychological medicine, 42(3), 545–555. The National Center for Victims of Crime. (2002). Strengthening Antistalking Statutes, 1-7. The National Center for Victims of Crime. (2007). Model Stalking Code Revisited: Responding to the New Realities of Stalking. 1-65. The National Institute of Justice. (1993). A Project to Develop a Model Anti-Stalking Code for States, A Final Summary Report Presented to the National Institute of Justice. Tjaden, P. G., & Thoennes N. (1998). Stalking in America : findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Tjaden, P. G. (2009). Stalking Policies and Research in the United States: A Twenty Year Retrospective. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15(3), 261–278. Tran, N. B. (2003). A comparative look at anti-stalking legislation in the United States and Japan. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 26, 445-477. Vilić V. (2018). Victims and Perpetrators of Stalking and Cyber Stalking: What Has Changed in the Criminal Legislation of Serbia? 4 SEE Law Journal, 78-91. Welch, J. M. (1995), "Stalking and anti‐stalking legislation: A guide to the literature of a new legal concept", Reference Services Review, 23(3), 53-68. Weller, M., Hope, L., & Sheridan, L. (2013). Police and Public Perceptions of Stalking: The Role of Prior Victim–Offender Relationship. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(2), 320-339. White, E., Longpré, N., & Stefanska, E. B. (2022). Stalking Behaviors Presented by Ex-Intimate Stalkers: A Victim's Perspective. Journal of interpersonal violence, 37(7-8), NP5074–NP5093. Wykes, M. (2007). Constructing crime: Culture, stalking, celebrity and cyber. Crime, Media, Culture, 3(2), 158-174. Zona, M. A., Sharma, K. K., & Lane, J. (1993). A comparative study of erotomanic and obsessional subjects in a forensic sample. Journal of forensic sciences, 38(4), 894–903. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94321 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 跟蹤騷擾，自過去以來一直被視為惡性輕微之行為，儘管被害人向警察求助，執法機關也可能面臨欠缺介入之法源依據。近三十年內，有鑑於由跟蹤騷擾演變為生命侵害之案件一再引起大眾之關注，為回應社會之期待並彌補法律之漏洞，國內外立法者紛紛制定關於跟蹤騷擾之法律規範，將跟蹤騷擾之犯罪化。
在犯罪學上，對於跟蹤騷擾行為之探討，自1990年代起各國制定跟蹤騷擾法規發展以來，也隨之受到更多之關注與研究。從行為人、被害人、行為之特性等方面，嘗試多方理解跟蹤騷擾行為之成因，以達到終止跟蹤騷擾行為與預防犯罪之目的，並考量到跟蹤騷擾係被認為與性別有關之犯罪，並與家庭、約會暴力之間具有密切之關連，故犯罪學之研究亦從性別議題出發，針對涉及跟蹤騷擾之行為人、被害人，以及雙方性別之異同為研究。 本文之目的，在於考量我國在跟蹤騷擾領域之犯罪學及或實證研究仍非多見，故期望透過外國在跟蹤騷擾犯罪學領域之研究，探究有關跟蹤騷擾行為之成因、行為人之動機、犯罪黑數之形成、司法部門之應對等層面，據此對於跟蹤騷擾之犯罪，有更為全面之理解。 此外，本文並以美國法作為比較法之研究對象，以美國反跟追法之制定與修訂之法制層面為基礎，進一步探討美國反跟追法實行之數年間，在法實踐上所陸續發現之問題與困境，以此提出跟蹤騷擾犯罪之相關研究，在未來可能發展之面貌。 綜上所述，本文之目的，乃在於期望結合上述實證、法制比較與法實踐之研究，為我國現行之跟蹤騷擾防制法，以及未來之法制與實務發展，提供可能之參考方向，故於最末之章節，本文將檢視我國現行之跟蹤騷擾防制法，自本法之保護法益、各項構成要件，以及跟蹤騷擾法在目前實務之運作為分析，並對於有關本法是否仍存在部分尚待修正之問題的爭議，嘗試以本文見解作為回應。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In the past, stalking often has been taken as petty crime or even unpunishable. When facing stalkers, although victims may turn to the police for help, the law enforcement might be unable to give proper respond. Stepping in the stalking circumstances could be difficult due to the absence of legal resources, leaving victims often unable to receive adequate help from law enforcement.
Over the past decades, several stalking cases have escalated to severe violence against the victims in many countries. These cases have not only prompted the public to start paying attention to the stalking phenomenon, but have also contributed to the enactment of anti-stalking laws. In an effort to address the issue caused by stalking, legislators ultimately criminalized stalking behaviors. Besides the research from a legal perspective, the study of the criminology of stalking has also been well developed. The scope of this field includes extensive research on stalkers, victims, stalking behaviors, and the relationships between stalkers and victims. The ultimate goal of studying stalking in criminology is to cease the stalking behaviors of perpetrators and prevent recidivism. Additionally, stalking is recognized as a gendered crime closely associated with domestic violence. Therefore, criminological research on stalking also focuses on the sex and gender dynamics of both perpetrators and victims. Since Taiwan did not enact the Stalking and Harassment Prevention Act until 2021, there was limited research in criminology or empirical studies on stalking. With the law having been coming into effect for only about two years, its effectiveness remains uncertain. Therefore, studying stalking from other countries could potentially serve as a reference point to better understand stalking crimes. Among international anti-stalking legislation, the American Anti-Stalking law was first established in California, which subsequently led to nationwide enactment of anti-stalking laws. This initiative also set a trend for stalking legislation in the 1990s. To assess the effectiveness of anti-stalking laws, the U.S. government and scholars have dedicated to studying practicing law. By examining the application of these laws in practice, the inadequacies and unresolved issues regarding stalking can be identified and applied to revise anti-stalking legislation. The development and predicament of American anti-stalking law may also provides a possible picture for the future development of Taiwan’s anti-stalking laws. In conclusion, the purpose of this thesis is to enhance understanding of stalking through legal research in criminology, comparative law, and practical application of stalking crimes. To achieve this objective, this thesis will revisit the review of Taiwan’s stalking legislation and examine court responses to stalking cases in final section. Additionally, this thesis aims to address ongoing debates surrounding the elements of stalking crimes. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-15T16:48:26Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-15T16:48:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘要 iii Abstract v 目次 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與問題意識 1 第二節 研究範圍與研究方法 4 第三節 論文及章節架構 4 第二章 犯罪學觀點下的跟蹤騷擾行為─關於跟蹤騷擾行為人之實證研究 7 第一節 跟蹤騷擾之用語與定義 10 第二節 關於跟蹤騷擾相關之實證研究─跟蹤騷擾行為人之類型劃分 13 第一項 行為人是否具有精神疾患 18 第二項 依行為人─被害人關係與行為人動機劃分類型 20 第三章 跟蹤騷擾行為之性別研究 41 第一節 女性之跟蹤騷擾行為人 43 第一項 統計分析概論 43 第二項 跟蹤騷擾手段之比較 47 第二節 同性別之間的跟蹤騷擾行為 52 第一項 性別與跟蹤騷擾 52 第二項 同性與異性間跟蹤騷擾之差異 54 第三項 實證研究之侷限 57 第三節 小結 58 第四章 跟蹤騷擾防制法規之實踐與修正 60 第一節 反跟追法之制定與修正──以美國1993年反跟追模範法典與2007年修正建議為主軸 63 第一項 反跟追法之立法模式與處罰基礎 64 第二項 跟蹤騷擾之要件 67 第三項 反跟追模範法典之修正建議 72 第二節 美國反跟追法之實踐 80 第一項 法規實行之現狀及尚存之問題 80 第二項 實務應用：風險模型之建構 93 第三項 結論：跟蹤騷擾相關研究之未來發展方向 101 第五章 我國跟蹤騷擾防制法與實務概況 104 第一節 保護法益與要件 104 第一項 保護法益與法規定位 104 第二項 跟蹤騷擾之構成要件 107 第二節 實務案例與判決 112 第一項 內政部警政署：跟蹤騷擾案件被害人概況 112 第二項 法院判決 112 第三項 相關判決之初步分析 121 第六章 結論 125 參考文獻 135 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 反跟追 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 跟蹤騷擾 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 跟蹤騷擾防制法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 性與性別 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 犯罪學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | anti-stalking law | en |
| dc.subject | criminology | en |
| dc.subject | Stalking and Harassment Prevention Act | en |
| dc.subject | harassment | en |
| dc.subject | stalking | en |
| dc.title | 犯罪學觀點下之跟蹤騷擾─以美國法為中心 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Criminology of Stalking: A Perspective from American Anti-Stalking Law | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林琬珊;黃種甲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Wan-shan Lin;Patrick Chung-Chia Huang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 跟蹤騷擾,反跟追,犯罪學,性與性別,跟蹤騷擾防制法, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | stalking,harassment,anti-stalking law,criminology,Stalking and Harassment Prevention Act, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 149 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202402491 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-08 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 法律學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 法律學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 法律學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.97 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。