請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94256完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張佑宗 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yu-tzung Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 賈選凝 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Xuan-Ning Jia | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-15T16:28:26Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-16 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-08-15 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-08-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
尹寶珊、鄭宏泰，2016，〈身份認同：對中國的「重新想像」〉，趙永佳、葉仲茵、李鏗（編），《躁動青春：香港新世代處境觀察》，香港：中華書局，頁127-142。 王娟譯，2018，《民族認同》，南京：譯林出版社。譯自：Anthony D. Smith. National Identity. London: Penguin.1991. 王鯤譯，2010，《身份認同的困境》，北京：社會科學文獻出版社。譯自Alfred Grosser. Les identités difficiles. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.2007. 丘昌泰，2008，〈族群、文化與認同：連鎖關係的再檢視〉，《國家與社會》，5：1-35。 石之瑜，2000，《文明衝突與中國》，台北：五南。 石之瑜，2006，《身份政治——偶然性、能動者與情境》。高雄：國立中山大學出版社。 呂大樂，2002，〈思想「九七前」與「後九七」香港〉，謝均才（編），《我們的地方，我們的時間：香港社會新編》，香港：牛津大學出版社，頁450-475。 呂大樂，2011，〈終於需要面對未來：香港回歸及其設計上的錯誤〉，《思想》第19期「香港：解殖與回歸」，頁89-101。 呂大樂，2013，〈特區管治矛盾的政治經濟學基礎〉，「本土論述編輯委員會」及「新力量網絡」（編），《本土論述2012：官商勾結》，台北：漫遊者文化，頁1-5。 林泉忠，2017，《誰是中國人》，台灣：時報文化，頁101-108。 林宗弘，2015。〈再探臺灣的世代政治：交叉分類隨機效應模型的應用，1995-2010〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，27(2)：395-436。 林啟驊，2013，《一國兩制下香港政治的變遷》，東吳大學政治學系博士論文。 林肇豊，2015，《台灣、香港本土論的發展與比較研究》，國立成功大學台灣文學系博士論文。 江宜樺，1998，《自由主義、民族主義與國家認同》，台北：揚智文化。 李靜婷，2010，《台灣選民政治認同之世代分析》，台北：台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。 沈暐婕，2017，《台灣天然獨世代的民族認同與國家認同》，台北：台灣大學政治學系碩士論文。 吳叡人譯，2010，《想像的共同體：民族主義的起源與散布》，台北：時報出版。譯自Benedict Anderson. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Rev. ed. London: Verso, 2006. Print. 吳叡人，2014，〈The Lilliputian Dream：關於香港民族主義的思考筆記〉，香港大學學生會學苑（編），《香港民族論》，頁77-98。 吳俊雄、馬傑偉、呂大樂，2016，〈港式文化研究〉，朱耀偉（編），《香港研究作為方法》，香港：中華書局，頁164-179。原文刊於吳俊雄、馬傑偉、呂大樂（編），2006，《香港·文化·研究》，香港：香港大學出版社，頁1-20。 吳乃德，2005，〈麵包與愛情：初探台灣民眾民族認同的變動〉，《台灣政治學刊》，9(2)：5-39。 吳乃德，2013，〈狂飆的年代？一般民眾的認同趨勢，1992-2005〉，張茂桂、羅文輝、徐火炎等（編），《台灣社會變遷1985~2005：傳播與政治行為》，台北：中央研究院社會學研究所，頁93-128。 周蕾，1995，〈殖民者與殖民者之間〉，《寫在家國以外》，香港：牛津大學出版社，頁91-115。譯自Chow Rey. Writing Diaspora: Tactics of intervention in Contemporary Cultural Studies. Indiana University Press. 1993,1-26. 金耀基，1997，〈行政吸納政治——香港的政治模式〉，《中國政治與文化》，香港：牛津大學出版社，頁21-45。 馬傑偉、吳俊雄、呂大樂（編），2009，《香港文化政治》，香港：香港大學出版社。 馬傑偉、馮應謙、林萃光，2011，〈後京奧香港身份認同〉，《香港·生活·文化》，香港：牛津大學出版社，頁54-67。 馬嶽，2011，〈後工業年代香港的政治價值〉，《二十一世紀評論》，12：4-14。 馬嶽，2020，《反抗的共同體》，台灣：左岸出版。 徐承恩，2014，〈城邦述事：香港本土意識簡史〉，香港大學學生會學苑（編），《香港民族論》，頁127-163。 陳向明，2009，《社會科學質的研究》，台北：五南。 陳冠中，2008，《下一個十年：香港的光榮年代？》。香港：牛津大學出版社。 陳雲，2011，《香港城邦論》，香港：天窗出版。 陳智傑，2015，〈愛恨交織的中港情意結：香港國族認同的許諾與失落〉，「本土論述編輯委員會」及「新力量網絡」（編），《本土論述2013-2014：中國因素：本土意識與公民社會》，台北：漫遊者文化，頁115-124。 梁繼平，2014，〈綜援撤限爭議與本土政治共同體〉，香港大學學生會學苑（編），《香港民族論》，頁23-31。 強世功，2008，《中國香港：文化與政治的視野》，香港：牛津大學出版社。 強世功，2010，〈國家認同與文化政治——香港人的身份變遷與價值認同變遷〉，《文化縱橫》3(6)：110-115。 許寶強，2018，《情感政治》，香港：天窗出版社。 張炳良，2009，〈香港的「身份」迷思〉，收錄於「本土論述編輯委員會」及「新力量網絡」編，《本土論述2008》。香港：上書局，頁74-83。 張瀚元，2014，〈「香港民族論」的孕育與時代意義——專訪《學苑》前總編輯梁繼平〉，《轉角國際》網頁：http://global.udn.com/global_vision/story/8663/823000/ 2023/05/17 張寧珈，2018，《感性與理性：外省族群意識、民族認同與國家想像》，台北：台灣大學社會科學院國家發展研究所碩士論文。 張佑宗，2014，〈中國因素與臺灣國家認同的變遷〉，「臺灣民眾和平效能感與國家認同學術」研討會（9月9日），臺北：二十一世紀基金會：頁 1-27。 張佑宗、司宇航、曾煥凱與吳峻鋕。（forthcoming），〈中國軍事演習與臺灣國家認同的變遷：一項調查實驗設計〉。《調查研究》。 楊汝萬、沈建法、張力，2006，〈中國的十一五規劃：香港的機遇和挑戰〉，http://www.bauhinia.org/assets/pdf/research/20061128/China11FYP-HK-FR-Chinese.pdf，2006/11/28。 葉蔭聰，2011，〈香港新本土論述的自我批判意識〉，《思想》第19期「香港：解殖與回歸」，頁103-116。 蔡玉萍，2021，〈由銀髮到社運家長：運動中跨世代抗爭共同體的構建〉，載於李立峯編《時代的行動者》，頁174-189。香港：牛津大學出版社。 蒙志成，2016，〈越融合或越疏離？解析當前兩岸交流下台灣民眾身分認同的內涵與影響〉，《台灣政治學刊》20(2)：187-262。 賴家賢，2014，《從世代差異看中國崛起對台灣民眾國家認同的影響》，台北：台灣大學社會科學院政治學系碩士論文。 劉兆佳，2000，《香港21世紀藍圖》。香港：中文大學出版社。 劉兆佳，2015，《一國兩制在香港的實踐》。香港：香港商務印書館。 劉兆佳，2022，〈淺談「人心回歸」〉，《紫荊論壇》網頁，https://bau.com.hk/article/2022-05/13/content_974624592199585792.html 2023/06/08 鄭戈，2019，〈一國兩制與國家整合：寫在香港回歸22週年前夕〉，愛思想網頁，https://www.aisixiang.com/data/116861.html，2019/06/24。 鄭宏泰、尹寶珊、黃子為，2022，〈本土主義再探：面貌與特質的分析〉，載於蕭新煌、陳志柔、鄭宏泰編，《2020中國效應：台港民眾的態度變遷》，香港：香港中文大學香港亞太研究所。 鄭祖邦，2019，〈在中國因素下香港本土意識的分歧與整合：2003至2016年〉，《台灣社會學》12：115-161。 閻小駿，2016，《當代政治學十講》，香港：香港中文大學出版社。 蕭阿勤，2010，《回歸現實：台灣一九七○年代的戰後世代與文化政治變遷》（第二版），台北：中央研究院社會學研究所。 羅永生，2007，《殖民無間道》，香港：牛津大學出版社。 羅永生，2014，〈邁向具主體性的本土性〉，《殖民家國外》，香港：牛津大學出版社，頁14-30。 羅永生，2014，〈香港本土意識的前世今生〉，《思想》第26期「香港：本土與左右」。 羅永生，2015，《勾結共謀的殖民權力》，香港：牛津大學出版社。 羅永生，2018，〈身份政治往何處去〉，鄭煒、袁瑋熙（編），《社運年代 : 香港抗爭政治的軌跡》，香港：香港中文大學出版社。頁19-36。 英文文獻 Abdelal, Rawi., Yoshiko M. Herrera, Alastair Iain Johnston and Rose McDermott, eds. 2009. Measuring Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Aberson, C. L. 2015. Positive intergroup contact, negative intergroup contact, and threat as predictors of cognitive and affective dimensions of prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 18(6):743-760. Abrams, D.and Hogg, M. A. 1988. “Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination.” European Journal of Social Psychology 18(4):317–334. Abrams, D. and Hogg, M. A. 2010. “Social identity and self-categorization.” In The Sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination, eds. J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick and V. M. Esses. London, UK: Sage, 179–193. Allport, F. H.1924. Social Psychology. New York: Houghton Mifflin. Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Community: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso. Asch, S. E. 1952. Social psychology. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Babbie, Earl. 2014. The practice of social research (14th ed.). Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Berkowitz, L. 1962. Aggression: A social psychological analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill. Billig, M. and Tajfel, H.1973. “Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour.” European Journal of Social Psychology, 3(1), 27–52. Brady, Henry and Cynthia S. Kaplan. 2009. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Ethnic Identity.” In Measuring Identity: A Guide for Social Science, eds. Rawi Abdlal, Yoshiko M. Herrera, Alastair Iain Johnston and Rose McDermott. New York: Cambridge University Press,17–32. Brass, Paul R. 1996. “Ethnic Groups and Ethnic Identity Formation.” In Ethnicity, eds. John Hutchinson and Anthony D. Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press,28-31. Braungart, Richard G. and Braungat, Margaret M. 1989. “Political Generations." Research in political Sociology 4:281-319. Brewer, M. B.1996. “When contact is not enough: Social identity and intergroup cooperation.” International journal of Intercultural relations 20(3-4): 291-303. Brewer, M. B.1999.“The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate?” Journal of Social Issues 55(3):429–444. Brewer, M. B. 2001. “Ingroup identification and intergroup conflict: When does ingroup love become outgroup hate? ” In Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction, eds. R. D. Ashmore, L. Jussim and D. Wilder. Oxford University Press,17–41. Brown, R. 2000. “Social Identity Theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges.” European Journal of Social Psychology 30(6):745–778. Brown, R. J. and Turner, J. C. 1981. “Interpersonal and intergroup behavior”. In Intergroup Behaviour, eds. J. C. Turner and H. Giles. Basil Blackwell, Oxford. Bruner, J. S.1957. On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review 64(2):123–152. Buss, A. H. and Portnoy, N. W. 1967. “Pain tolerance and group identification.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 6(1):106-108. Campbell, D. T. 1958. “Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of person as social entities.” Behavioural Science 3:14–25. Cerulo, Karen A.1997. “Identity construction: new issues, new directions.” Academy Review of Sociology 23(1): 385–409. Chang, Y.-t., C.-c. Wu and M. Weatherall. 2014. “The China Factor and the Generational Shift over National Identity.” Paper presented at The Politics of Polarization: Taiwan in Comparative Perspective. Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law at Stanford University, October 17-18, Califonia. Chen, Rou-Lan.2012. “Beyond National Identity in Taiwan: A Multidimensional and Evolutionary Conceptualization.” Asian Survey, 52(5):845–871. Cohen, Jean L.1985. “Strategy or Identity: New Theoretical Paradigms and Contemporary Social movements.” Social Research, 52(4): 663-716. Cook, S.W. 1985. “Experimenting on social issues. The case of school desegregation.” American Psychologist 40(4):452-60. Cooper, L.2018.“You have to fight on your own: Self-alienation and the new Hong Kong nationalism.” In Citizenship, Identity and Social Movements in the New Hong Kong: Localism after the Umbrella Movement, eds. Wai-man L. and Cooper, L. London: Routledge, 94-113. Connolly, William E.1991. “Confessing Identity\\\\\\\\Belonging to Difference.” Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox (NED-New edition). University of Minnesota Press. Cornell, S. E. and D. Hartmann. 1998. Mapping the Terrain-Definitions. Ethnicity and Race: Making Identities in a Changing World. S. E. C. A. D. Hartmann. Thousand Oaks, CA, Pine Forge Press. Deaux, K.1993. “Reconstructing social identity”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(1), 4-12. Dehdari, Sirus H., and Kai Gehring. 2022. "The Origins of Common Identity: Evidence from Alsace-Lorraine." American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 14 (1): 261–92. Dixon J, Tredoux C, Sturgeon B, Hocking B, Davies G, Huck J, Whyatt D, Jarman N, Bryan D.2020. 'When the walls come tumbling down': The role of intergroup proximity, threat, and contact in shaping attitudes towards the removal of Northern Ireland's peace walls. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(4), 922–944. Doise, W& Sinclair, A.1973. “The categorization process in intergroup relations”. European Journal of Social Psychology 3,145-157. Doise, W. and Weinberger, M.1973. “Representations masculines dans differentes situations de rencontres mixtes”. Bulletin de Psychologie, 26,649-57. Doise,W. 1978. Groups and individuals: Explanations in social psychology. Cambridge U Press. Downes, James F.2018. “Mainland Chinese immigration in Hong Kong: Analysing anti-immigrant sentiment.” In Citizenship, Identity and Social Movements in the New Hong Kong: Localism after the Umbrella Movement, eds. Wai-man L. and Cooper, L. London: Routledge, 51-71. Duckitt, J. and Mphuthing, T. 1998. “Group identification and intergroup attitudes: A longitudinal analysis in South Africa.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(1), 80–85. Easton, David and Jack Dennis.1969. Children in the Political System: Origins of Political Legitimacy. New York: McGraw-Hill. Eyerman, Ron and Bryan S. Turner.1998. “Outline of a Theory of Generations.” European Journal of Social Theory 1(1): 91-106. Gaertner, S.L., Dovidio, J.F., and Bachman, B.A. 1996. “Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common ingroup identity.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20(3-4), 271-290. Gehring, Kai. 2022. Can external threats foster a European Union identity? Evidence from Russia's invasion of Ukraine, The Economic Journal 132(644) ,1489-1516. Gerring, John. 2009. “The Case Study: What it is and What it does” in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, eds. Carles Boix and Susan C Stokes. New York: Oxford University Press, 90-122. Gehring, K. 2021. “Can External Threats Foster a European Union Identity? Evidence from Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine.” The Economic Journal 132(644):1489-1516. Geertz, C.1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books. Gilroy, Paul.1987. There Ain’t No Black in the Union Jack: The Cultural Politics of Race and Nation. London: Century Hutchinson. Glenn, Norval D. 1977. Cohort Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Grieve, P. G. and Hogg, M. A. 1999. “Subjective uncertainty and intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25(8), 926–940. Hamilton, D. L. and Sherman, S. J. 1996. “Perceiving persons and groups.” Psychological Review 103(2), 336–355. Hardin, R. 1995. “Self-interest, group identity.” In Nationalism and rationality, eds. Breton, Albert. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 14-42. Hechter, Michael. 2000. Containing Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hogg, M. A. 2000a. “Social identity and social comparison.” In Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research, eds. J. Suls and L. Wheeler. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers,401–421. Hogg, M. A. 2000b. “Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes.” European Review of Social Psychology 11(1):223–255. Hogg, M. A. 2006. “Social identity theory.” In Contemporary social psychological theories, ed. P. J. Burke. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 111–136. Hogg, M. A. 2007. “Uncertainty-identity theory.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 39:69-126. Hogg, M. A., Sherman, D. K., Dierselhuis, J., Maitner, A. T. and Moffitt, G. 2007. “Uncertainty, entitativity, and group identification.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43(1), 135–142. Hogg, M. A., Meehan, C., and Farquharson, J.2010. “The solace of radicalism: Self-uncertainty and group identification in the face of threat.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46(6):1061–1066. Hogg, M. A. 2012. “Uncertainty-identity theory.” In Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2), eds. P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski and E. T. Higgins. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 62–80. Hogg, M. A. 2014. “From uncertainty to extremism: Social categorization and identity processes.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 23(5):338–342. Jenkins, R.1996. Social identity. London: Routledge. Jonas, E., McGregor, I., Klackl, J., Agroskin, D., Fritsche, I., Holdbrook, C., . . . Quirin, M.2014.“Threat and defense: From anxiety to approach.” In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol.49), eds. J. M. Olson and M. P. Zanna. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 219–286. Jung, J., Hogg, M.A. and Choi, H.-S.2016. “Reaching Across the DMZ: Identity Uncertainty and Reunification on the Korean Peninsula.” Political Psychology 37(3): 341-350. Jung, J., Hogg, M. A.and Lewis, G. J. 2018. “Identity uncertainty and UK–Scottish relations: Different dynamics depending on relative identity centrality.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 21(6), 861–873. Jung, J., Hogg, M. A., Livingstone, A. G. and Choi, H.-S. 2019.From uncertain boundaries to uncertain identity: Effects of entitativity threat on identity–uncertainty and emigration. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 49(10):623–633. Jung, J., Hogg, M. A., & Choi, H.-S. 2019. Recategorization and ingroup projection: Two processes of identity uncertainty reduction. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 3(2), 97–114. Laitin, D. D. 1998. Identity in Formation: the Russian-Speaking Populations in the Near Abroad. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Lam, Wai-man.2018. “Hong Kong’s fragmented soul.” In Citizenship, Identity and Social Movements in the New Hong Kong: Localism after the Umbrella Movement, eds. Wai-man L. and Cooper, L. London: Routledge, 72-93. Lee, Eliza Wing Yee. 1999. “Governing Post-Colonial Hong Kong: Institutional Incongruity, Governance Crisis, and Authoritarianism.” Asian Survey 39 (6): 940-59. Lewin, K. 1939. “Field theory and experiment in social psychology: concepts and methods.” American Journal of Sociology 44(6):868–896. Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S. J.and Uhles, A. N. 2000. “Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78(2), 223–246. Lott, A. J., & Lott, B. E. 1965. “Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables.” Psychological Bulletin 64(4):259–309. Lu, Rachel.2014. “Report: Hong Kong Becoming ‘Mere Second-Tier’ Chinese,” In http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/09/02/report-hong-kong-becoming-mere-second-tier-chinese-city/. Latest update 31 July 2024. Lui, T. lok. 2015. “A missing page in the grand plan of “one country, two systems”: regional integration and its challenges to post-1997 Hong Kong.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 16(3):396–409. Kotzur, Patrick & Wagner, Ulrich. 2020. The Dynamic Relationship Between Contact Opportunities, Positive and Negative Intergroup Contact, and Prejudice: A Longitudinal Investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 120. 418-442. Kuan, Hsin-chi and Lau, Siu-kai. 1995. “The Partial Vision of Democracy in Hong Kong: A Survey of Popular Opinion.” The China Journal, 34:239-64. Kuan, Hsin-chi and Poon, Kit. 2002.“The Hollowing Out of the ‘One Country Two Systems’ Framework：China's Hong Kong Policy in a Changing Context.” Paper presented at the Workshop on “Forward New Century: Cross Strait Tri-regional Government Relationship”, May 18, Taipei. Kuo, Alexander and Yotam Margalit. 2012. “Measuring Individual Identity.” Comparative Politics, 44(4), 459–479. Ma, K.W., and Y.H. Fung.1999. “Re-sinicization, nationalism and the Hong Kong identity”. In Press and politics in Hong Kong, eds. Y.K. So and M. Chan. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press, 497-528. Ma, Ngok.2018. “Changing Identity Politics. The Democracy Movement in Hong Kong.” In Citizenship, Identity and Social Movements in the New Hong Kong: Localism after the Umbrella Movement, eds. Wai-man L. and Cooper, L. London: Routledge, 34-50. Ma, R., & Ma, Z. 2023. “How are we going to treat Chinese people during the pandemic? Media cultivation of intergroup threat and blame.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 26(3):515-533. Mannheim, Karl.1972. “The Problem of Generations” In The New Pilgrims, eds. Philip G. Altbach and Robert S. Laufer. New York: David McKay,101-138. McDermott, Rose. 2009. “Psychological Approached to Identity: Experimentation and Application.” In Measuring Identity: A Guide for Social Science, eds. Rawi Abdlal, Yoshiko M. Herrera, Alastair Iain Johnston, and Rose McDermott. New York: Cambridge University Press, 345–408. Melucci, Alberto. 1989. Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and individual Needs in Contemporary Society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Mullin, B.-A., and Hogg, M. A.1998. “Dimensions of subjective uncertainty in social identification and minimal intergroup discrimination.” British Journal of Social Psychology 37(3):345-365. Mullin, B.-A., and Hogg, M. A.1999. “Motivations for group membership: The role of subjective importance and uncertainty reduction.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 21(2):91–102. Mummendey, A. and Wenzel, M. 1999. “Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: reactions to intergroup difference.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 3(2):158-74. O'Brien M., Penna S., and Hay C.1999.eds.Theorising Modernity: Reflexivity, Environment and Identity in Giddens’ Social Theory. London: Longman. Onorato, R. S. and Turner, J. C. 2004. “Fluidity in the self-concept: The shift from personal to social identity.” European Journal of Social Psychology 34(3):257–278. Schein, Louisa. 2000. Minority Rules: The Miao and the Feminine in China's Cultural Politics. Durham: Duke University Press. Shamir, M., and Sagiv-Schifter, T. 2006. “Conflict, Identity, and Tolerance: Israel in the Al-Aqsa Intifada.” Political Psychology 27(4):569–595. Sherif, M.1936. The psychology of social norms. Harper. Sherif, M., Harvey, O.J., White, B.J., Hood, W., and Sherif, C.W. 1961. Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment. Norman, OK: The University Book Exchange. Sherif, M. 1967. Group conflict and cooperation: Their social psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Sherif, M. and C. W. Sherif. 1969. Interdisciplinary Relationships in the Social Sciences. Chicago: Aldine. Sherman, D. K., Hogg, M. A. and Maitner, A. T. 2009. “Perceived polarization: Reconciling ingroup and intergroup perceptions under uncertainty.” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 12(1):95–109. Sindic, D. 2011. “Psychological Citizenship and National identity.” Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 21(3): 202-214. Smith, Anthony D. 1986. Ethnic Origins of Nations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Smith, Anthony D. 1993. “The ethnic sources of nationalism.” Survival 35(1):48–62. Stephan, W. G., Diaz-Loving, R., & Duran, A. 2000. Integrated threat theory and intercultural attitudes: Mexico and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(2), 240–249. Stephan, W. G., Boniecki, K. A., Ybarra, O., Bettencourt, A., Ervin, K. S., Jackson, L. A., McNatt, P. S., & Renfro, C. L. 2002. The role of threats in the racial attitudes of Blacks and White. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(9), 1242–1254. Sylvan, Donald A. and Amanda K. Metskas. 2009. “Trade-offs in Measuring Identities: A Comparison of Five Approached.” In Measuring Identity: A Guide for Social Science, eds. Rawi Abdlal, Yoshiko M. Herrera, Alastair Iain Johnston, and Rose McDermott. New York: Cambridge University Press, 72–112. Tajfel, H.1969. “The formation of national attitudes: a social-psychological perspective.” In Interdisciplinary relationships in the social sciences, eds. Muzafer Sherif and Carolyn W. Sherif. Chicago: Aldine,137-176. Tajfel, H. 1974. “Social Identity and Intergroup Behavior,” Social Science Information 13: 65–93. Tajfel, H. 1978. ed. Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Academic Press. Tajfel, H. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. England: Cambridge University Press. Tajfel, H. and Turner, J.C.1985. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behaviour.” In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 2nd Edition, eds. Worchel, S. and Austin, W.G. Chicago: Nelson Hall, 7-24. Taylor, C. 1994. “The Politics of Recognition”. Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Turner, John C. 1982. “Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group.” In Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, ed. H. Tajfel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Turner, John C. 1985. “Social Categorization and the Self-Concept: A Social Cognitive Theory of Group behavior,” in Advances in Group Processes: Theory and Research, ed. E. J. Lawler. Greenwich, CT: JAI press, 77–122. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., and Wetherell, M. S.1987. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Laitin, David. 1998. Identity in Formation: The Russian-Speaking Populations in the Near Abroad. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Waldzus, S., Mummendey, A., Wenzel, M. and Weber, U. 2003. “Towards tolerance: Representations of superordinate categories and perceived ingroup prototypicality.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 39(1), 31–47. Wagoner, J. A. and Hogg, M. A. 2016. “Normative dissensus, identity-uncertainty, and subgroup autonomy.” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 20(4): 310. Wagner, U., Lampen, L. and Syllwasschy, J.1986. “In-group inferiority, social identity and out-group devaluation in a modified minimal group study.” British Journal of Social Psychology 25(1):15-23. Wang, Chia Chou. 2019. “Constructing an Identity Scale to analyze changes in One China identity: evidence from Taiwanese student delegations visiting Mainland China.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 20(4):209-224. Wenzel, M., Mummendey, A., Weber, U. and Waldzus, S. 2003. “The in-group as pars pro toto: Projection from the ingroup onto the inclusive category as a precursor to social discrimination.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29(4), 461–473. Wenzel, M., Mummendey, A.and Waldzus, S. 2007. “Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model.” European Review of Social Psychology 18(1),331–372. Wilder, D. A. 1981. “Perceiving persons as a group: Categorization and intergroup relations.” In Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior, ed. D. L. Hamilton. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 213-257. Wilder, D. A. and Shapiro, P. N. 1984. Role of out-group cues in determining social identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47(2):342–348. Walker, R. B. J. 1993. Inside/outside: international relations as political theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94256 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 香港主權回歸中國已超過25 年，但香港民眾視自己為「中國人」的單一認同比例，在2008 年後始終低於視自己為「香港人」的單一認同比例。及至2022年，18-29 歲港人對中國人身分的認同比例只有1997 年的四分之一。「五十年不變」的承諾已步入下半場，哪些因素導致香港人否定中國人身分？不同世代之間有無差異？對於否定中國人身分的香港民眾而言，中港關係出現轉變，他們會否願意做中國人？
本研究以滾雪球法找到四十位香港民眾作為受訪者，以焦點團體訪談法共執行八組焦點小組訪談，探詢不同世代香港民眾如何在「香港人」與「中國人」兩種身分中進行認同選擇，進而·在情境導向的自我歸類理論之脈絡下，以身分不確定論分析回歸二十五年來香港人核心身分認同的轉變。 本研究主要發現有三：第一，香港人對中國人身分的否定，與個人的核心身分認同有關。最不接受中國人身分的，是自我定義為純粹香港人的香港民眾；廣義香港人能在一定程度上接受「中國人」身分；廣義中國人一直能夠接受中國人身分。第二，只有純粹香港人具有核心身分，廣義香港人和廣義中國人都處於身分不確定中，他們將「香港人」和「中國人」的身分視為客觀事實。廣義香港人有可能因情境轉變而增強中國人認同；廣義中國人不會因情境轉變而增強香港人認同。第三，香港回歸至今，香港民眾的認同轉變中，只出現了香港人認同減弱，從未出現中國人認同增強。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | It has been over 25 years since Hong Kong's sovereignty was returned to China.
Still, the proportion of Hong Kong people identifying themselves as “Chinese” has been lower than that of “Hongkonger” since 2008. By 2022, the proportion of Hong Kong people aged 18-29 identifying themselves as Chinese was only one-fourth of that in 1997. The promise of "50 years with no change" has entered its second half,what factors have led to Hong Kong people dis-identifying themselves as Chinese?Are there any differences among different age groups? For those who dis-identifying themselves as Chinese, will they be willing to be Chinese due to the change of circumstances in the China-Hong Kong relations? This study conducted eight focus group interviews (2 groups of “Hongkongers”, 3 groups of “Hongkonger in broad sense”, and 3 groups of “Chinese in broad sense”) to explore the identity preferences of Hong Kong people within different age groups by snowballing. With the framework of identity-uncertainty under the perspective of self-categorization theory, the study aims to realize the changes in the relative identity centrality of Hong Kong people over the past 25 years after the handover. There are three main findings in this study. Firstly, to the extent of Hong Kong people dis-identifying themselves as Chinese is related to their relative identity centrality. Secondly, only Hongkongers regard "Hongkonger" as their core identity.Most “Hongkonger in broad sense” and “Chinese in broad sense” do not consider themselves to have a relative identity centrality, and regard both “Hong Kong citizens”and “Chinese citizens” identities as objective facts. Thirdly, since the handover of Hong Kong, the change in Hong Kong people's identity has only resulted in aweakening of Hongkonger identity, never a strengthening of Chinese identity. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-15T16:28:26Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-15T16:28:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i
謝辭 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究緣起 1 第二節 研究目的與主要研究問題 6 壹、研究目的 6 貳、主要研究問題 8 第三節 理論架構 10 壹、認同選擇的理論解釋 10 貳、「香港人」認同中的理性考量、情感依附與情境因素 14 參、本文的理論基礎：情境導向的認同選擇 18 第四節 章節安排 22 第二章 理論回顧與文獻探討 25 第一節 相關概念辨析 25 壹、「香港人」身分認同的不同層次 25 貳、本研究中「香港人」認同的概念界定 28 第二節 相關理論探討 32 壹、社會認同論的「情境導向」 32 貳、社會心理學中群體認同的情境效應 35 參、情境主義詮釋途徑下的認同變遷 37 第三節 相關研究檢討 46 壹、文化認同的衝突 46 貳、政治－法律制度層面的衝突 53 參、香港本土意識與中國國族認同的衝突 59 肆、既有研究的理論缺失：身分不確定 68 第三章 研究設計 71 第一節 研究架構與研究方法 71 壹、研究架構 71 貳、質性研究方法：焦點團體訪談法 75 第二節 研究對象 78 壹、焦點團體分組依據 78 貳、尋找訪談對象：滾雪球抽樣法 81 第四章 誰是「香港人」？ 85 第一節 「香港人」與「中國人」：內群體—外群體的差異 85 壹、1997年至2011年 86 貳、2012年至2017年 92 參、2019年之後 99 第二節 否定中國人身分的因素 107 壹、純粹香港人：文化與情感因素 107 貳、廣義中國人：理性因素 113 參、廣義香港人：多重因素 116 第三節 「核心身分」的選擇 122 壹、純粹香港人：我不是「中國的香港人」 122 貳、廣義香港人：我可以是「中國的香港人」 126 參、廣義中國人：我不會主動說自己是「中國人」 130 第四節 小結 134 壹、群體原型、群際差異、對兩種身分關係的詮釋 134 貳、否定中國人身分、身分不確定與核心身分的選擇 138 第五章 香港人的「核心身分」與認同轉變 141 第一節 純粹香港人 141 壹、1997年至2011年：核心身分未確立 142 貳、2012年至2017年：與中國人身分區隔 146 參、2019年之後：「香港人」核心身分確立 151 第二節 廣義香港人 155 壹、1997年至2011年：核心身分未確立 156 貳、2012年至2017年：中國人認同減弱 159 參、 2019年之後：香港人認同高於中國人認同 162 第三節 廣義中國人 168 壹、1997年至2011年：核心身分未確立 168 貳、2012年至2017年：香港人認同減弱 170 參、 2019年之後：兩種身分靈活切換 173 第四節 小結 179 壹、純粹香港人：我始終是香港人 179 貳、廣義香港人：香港人不會那麼快和中國人一樣 181 參、廣義中國人：香港人的身分已有定論 182 第六章 結論 185 第一節 主要研究發現 185 壹、核心身分：誰是香港人？ 185 貳、核心身分與否定中國人身分 189 參、核心身分與認同轉變 191 第二節 研究限制 193 第三節 後續研究建議 196 參考文獻 199 壹、中文 199 貳、英文 202 附錄 211 圖 次 圖 1–1 5 圖 2–1 27 圖 3–1 72 圖 5–1 145 圖 5–2 148 表 次 表 1–1 4 表 1–2 7 表 2–1 28 表 2–2 29 表 3–1 73 表 3–2 73 表 3–3 81 表 3–4 83 表 4–1 136 表 5–1 180 表 5–2 182 表 5–3 183 表 6–1 186 表 6–2 187 表 6–3 188 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.title | 為何選擇不做中國人？「香港人」的身分認同偏好 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Why Choose not to be Chinese? Exploring the Identity Preferences of ‘Hongkonger’ | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳親恩;蔡佳泓;陳光輝;郭銘峰 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chin-en Wu;Chia-hung Tsai;Kuang-hui Chen;Ming-Feng Kuo | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 香港人認同,中國人認同,身分不確定,核心身分認同,內群體認同, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Hongkonger,Hongkonger in broad sense,Chinese,identity-uncertainty,relative identity centrality,in-group identity, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 217 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202402511 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-08 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 8.24 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。