Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94245Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林偲妘 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Szu-Yun Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蔡佩珊 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yuwadee Kulthanaphanich | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-15T16:25:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-16 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-08-15 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-08-09 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Li, D., Huang, G., Zhang, G., and Wang, J., Driving factors of total carbon emissions from the construction industry in Jiangsu Province, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020. 276: p. 123179.
2. Chau, C. K., Leung, T. M., and Ng, W. Y., A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings. Applied Energy, 2015. 143: p. 395-413. 3. Programme, U. N. E., 2021 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero‑emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector. 2021. 4. Liang, Y., Li, C., Liu, Z., Wang, X., Zeng, F., Yuan, X., and Pan, Y., Decarbonization potentials of the embodied energy use and operational process in buildings: A review from the life-cycle perspective. Heliyon, 2023. 9(10): p. e20190. 5. Besen, P. and Boarin, P., Integrating energy retrofit with seismic upgrades to future-proof built heritage: Case studies of unreinforced masonry buildings in Aotearoa New Zealand. Building and Environment, 2023. 241: p. 110512. 6. Costantino, M., Ciro, Marco, Gerardo Maria, M., Fabrizio, A., and Andrea, P., Conceptual design of integrated seismic and energy retrofit interventions. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021. 38: p. 102190. 7. Peng, C., Calculation of a building's life cycle carbon emissions based on Ecotect and building information modeling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016. 112: p. 453-465. 8. Hui, L., Quanxue, D., Jingxiao, Z., Bo, X., and Martin, S., Assessing the life cycle CO2 emissions of reinforced concrete structures: Four cases from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019. 210: p. 1496-1506. 9. Lai, K. E., Abdul Rahiman, N., Othman, N., Ali, K. N., Lim, Y. W., Moayedi, F., and Mat Dzahir, M. A., Quantification process of carbon emissions in the construction industry. Energy and Buildings, 2023. 289: p. 113025. 10. Hao, J. L. and Ma, W., Evaluating carbon emissions of construction and demolition waste in building energy retrofit projects. Energy, 2023. 281: p. 128201. 11. Andrea, B. and Alessandra, M., Does seismic risk affect the environmental impact of existing buildings? Energy and Buildings, 2016. 110: p. 149-158. 12. Energy Efficiency and Seismic Resilience: A Common Approach , bookTitle= Multi-hazard Approaches to Civil Infrastructure Engineering. 2016, Cham: Springer International Publishing. 165--208. 13. Dionysios, A. B., Concurrent seismic and energy retrofitting of RC and masonry building envelopes using inorganic textile-based composites combined with insulation materials: A new concept. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2018. 148: p. 166-179. 14. Marini, A., Passoni, C., Belleri, A., Feroldi, F., Preti, M., Metelli, G., Riva, P., Giuriani, E., and Plizzari, G., Combining seismic retrofit with energy refurbishment for the sustainable renovation of RC buildings: a proof of concept. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2022. 26(7): p. 2475-2495. 15. Pohoryles, D. A., Bournas, D. A., Da Porto, F., Caprino, A., Santarsiero, G., and Triantafillou, T., Integrated seismic and energy retrofitting of existing buildings: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022. 61: p. 105274. 16. Pohoryles, D. A., Maduta, C., Bournas, D. A., and Kouris, L. A., Energy performance of existing residential buildings in Europe: A novel approach combining energy with seismic retrofitting. Energy and Buildings, 2020. 223: p. 110024. 17. Ademovic, N., Formisano, A., Penazzato, L., and Oliveira, D. V., Seismic and energy integrated retrofit of buildings: A critical review. Frontiers in Built Environment, 2022. 8. 18. Gkatzogias, K., Crowley, H., Veljkovic, A., Pohoryles, D., Norl’en, H., Tsionis, G., and Bournas, D., REEBUILD: Integrated techniques for the seismic strengthening and energy efficiency of existing buildings—Prioritising EU regions for building renovation: Seismic risk, EUR 31149. Energy Efficiency, Socioeconomic Vulnerability; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2022. 19. Calvi, G. M., Sousa, L., and Ruggeri, C., Energy efficiency and seismic resilience: A common approach. Multi-hazard approaches to civil infrastructure engineering, 2016: p. 165-208. 20. Lamperti Tornaghi, M., Loli, A., and Negro, P. Balanced Evaluation of Structural and Environmental Performances in Building Design. Buildings, 2018. 8, DOI: 10.3390/buildings8040052. 21. Crippa, J., Boeing, L. C., Caparelli, A. P. A., da Costa, M. d. R. d. M. M., Scheer, S., Araujo, A. M. F., and Bem, D., A BIM–LCA integration technique to embodied carbon estimation applied on wall systems in Brazil. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 2018. 8(5): p. 491-503. 22. Yang, X., Hu, M., Wu, J., and Zhao, B., Building-information-modeling enabled life cycle assessment, a case study on carbon footprint accounting for a residential building in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018. 183: p. 729-743. 23. Basbagill, J., Flager, F., Lepech, M., and Fischer, M., Application of life-cycle assessment to early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts. Building and Environment, 2013. 60: p. 81-92. 24. Zhang, X., Liu, K., and Zhang, Z., Life cycle carbon emissions of two residential buildings in China: Comparison and uncertainty analysis of different assessment methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020. 266: p. 122037. 25. Fenner, A. E., Kibert, C. J., Li, J., Razkenari, M. A., Hakim, H., Lu, X., Kouhirostami, M., and Sam, M., Embodied, operation, and commuting emissions: A case study comparing the carbon hotspots of an educational building. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020. 268: p. 122081. 26. Ansah, M. K., Chen, X., Yang, H., Lu, L., and Li, H., Developing a tier-hybrid uncertainty analysis approach for lifecycle impact assessment of a typical high-rise residential building. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2021. 167: p. 105424. 27. Turner, L. K. and Collins, F. G., Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: A comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete. Construction and building materials, 2013. 43: p. 125-130. 28. Gan, V. J., Deng, M., Tse, K. T., Chan, C. M., Lo, I. M., and Cheng, J. C., Holistic BIM framework for sustainable low carbon design of high-rise buildings. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018. 195: p. 1091-1104. 29. Fenner, A. E., Kibert, C. J., Woo, J., Morque, S., Razkenari, M., Hakim, H., and Lu, X., The carbon footprint of buildings: A review of methodologies and applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018. 94: p. 1142-1152. 30. Onat, N. C., Kucukvar, M., and Tatari, O., Scope-based carbon footprint analysis of US residential and commercial buildings: An input–output hybrid life cycle assessment approach. Building and Environment, 2014. 72: p. 53-62. 31. Li, X., Zhu, Y., and Zhang, Z., An LCA-based environmental impact assessment model for construction processes. Building and Environment, 2010. 45(3): p. 766-775. 32. Ramesh, T., Prakash, R., and Shukla, K., Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview. Energy and buildings, 2010. 42(10): p. 1592-1600. 33. Martínez-Rocamora, A., Solís-Guzmán, J., and Marrero, M., LCA databases focused on construction materials: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016. 58: p. 565-573. 34. Zhang, Y., Jiang, X., Cui, C., and Skitmore, M., BIM-based approach for the integrated assessment of life cycle carbon emission intensity and life cycle costs. Building and Environment, 2022. 226: p. 109691. 35. Economy, C., Embodied Carbon—The ICE Database. 36. Athena, S., Athena database content. 2015. 37. Ecoinvent, Ecoinvent Database. 2023, Ecoinvent Association. 38. Sphera, S., GaBi Database. 2023, Sphera Solutions. 39. Laboratory, N. R. E., US life cycle inventory database. 2012. 40. Wolf, M., Pennington, D., Pant, R., Chomkhamsri, K., and Pretato, U., European reference life cycle database (ELCD). Database, 2008: p. 1-30. 41. Mah, D., Manrique, J. D., Yu, H., Al‐Hussein, M., and Nasseri, R., House construction CO2 footprint quantification: a BIM approach. Construction Innovation, 2011. 11(2): p. 161-178. 42. Cheng, B., Li, J., Tam, V. W., Yang, M., and Chen, D., A BIM-LCA approach for estimating the greenhouse gas emissions of large-scale public buildings: a case study. Sustainability, 2020. 12(2): p. 685. 43. Wang, J., Wu, H., Duan, H., Zillante, G., Zuo, J., and Yuan, H., Combining life cycle assessment and Building Information Modelling to account for carbon emission of building demolition waste: A case study. Journal of cleaner production, 2018. 172: p. 3154-3166. 44. Wang, N., Satola, D., Houlihan Wiberg, A., Liu, C., and Gustavsen, A., Reduction strategies for greenhouse gas emissions from high-speed railway station buildings in a cold climate zone of China. Sustainability, 2020. 12(5): p. 1704. 45. Klöpffer, W. and Ciroth, A., Is LCC relevant in a sustainability assessment? The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2011. 16(2): p. 99-101. 46. Kehily, D. and Underwood, J., Embedding life cycle costing in 5D BIM. 2017. 47. Iso, I., 15686-5: Buildings and Constructed Assets-Service-Life Planning-Part 5: Life-Cycle Costing. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 2008. 48. Lu, K., Jiang, X., Tam, V., Li, M., Wang, H., Xia, B., and Chen, Q., Development of a Carbon Emissions Analysis Framework Using Building Information Modeling and Life Cycle Assessment for the Construction of Hospital Projects. Sustainability, 2019. 11: p. 6274. 49. Xu, Z., Wang, S., and Wang, E., Integration of BIM and energy consumption modelling for manufacturing prefabricated components: a case study in China. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019. 2019(1): p. 1609523. 50. Nizam, R. S., Zhang, C., and Tian, L., A BIM based tool for assessing embodied energy for buildings. Energy and Buildings, 2018. 170: p. 1-14. 51. Jrade, A. and Jalaei, F. Integrating building information modelling with sustainability to design building projects at the conceptual stage. in Building simulation. 2013. Springer. 52. Jalaei, F. and Jrade, A., An automated BIM model to conceptually design, analyze, simulate, and assess sustainable building projects. Journal of Construction Engineering, 2014. 2014(1): p. 672896. 53. Cavalliere, C., Habert, G., Dell'Osso, G. R., and Hollberg, A., Continuous BIM-based assessment of embodied environmental impacts throughout the design process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019. 211: p. 941-952. 54. Nwodo, M. N. and Anumba, C. J., A review of life cycle assessment of buildings using a systematic approach. Building and Environment, 2019. 162: p. 106290. 55. Soust-Verdaguer, B., Llatas, C., and García-Martínez, A., Critical review of bim-based LCA method to buildings. Energy and Buildings, 2017. 136: p. 110-120. 56. Ylmén, P., Penaloza, D., and Mjörnell, K., Life cycle assessment of an office building based on site-specific data. Energies, 2019. 12(13): p. 2588. 57. Röck, M., Hollberg, A., Habert, G., and Passer, A., LCA and BIM: Visualization of environmental potentials in building construction at early design stages. Building and environment, 2018. 140: p. 153-161. 58. Santos, R., Costa, A. A., Silvestre, J. D., and Pyl, L., Integration of LCA and LCC analysis within a BIM-based environment. Automation in Construction, 2019. 103: p. 127-149. 59. Fu, C., Kaya, S., and Kagioglou G. Aouad, M., The development of an IFC‐based lifecycle costing prototype tool for building construction and maintenance: Integrating lifecycle costing to nD modelling. Construction Innovation, 2007. 7(1): p. 85-98. 60. Lee, J., Tae, S., and Kim, R., A study on the analysis of CO2 emissions of apartment housing in the construction process. Sustainability, 2018. 10(2): p. 365. 61. Patacas, J., Dawood, N., and Kassem, M., BIM for facilities management: A framework and a common data environment using open standards. Automation in Construction, 2020. 120: p. 103366. 62. Ahmad, T. and Thaheem, M. J., Economic sustainability assessment of residential buildings: A dedicated assessment framework and implications for BIM. Sustainable cities and society, 2018. 38: p. 476-491. 63. Marzouk, M., Azab, S., and Metawie, M., BIM-based approach for optimizing life cycle costs of sustainable buildings. Journal of cleaner production, 2018. 188: p. 217-226. 64. Asmi, Athena LCA Software Tools Have Been Helping North American Sustainable Designers Since 2002. 2002. 65. eTool, About eToolLCD. 2022. 66. OneClickLca, Get Reliable Whole Building Life-Cycle Assessments, Instantly. 2021. 67. Solís-Guzmán, J., Rivero-Camacho, C., Alba-Rodríguez, D., and Martínez-Rocamora, A., Carbon Footprint Estimation Tool for Residential Buildings for Non-Specialized Users: OERCO2 Project. Sustainability, 2018. 10(1359). 68. BuildCarbonNeutral, Estimate the Embodied CO2 of a Whole Construction Project. 2007. 69. Tally, Know Your Impact. 2021. 70. BuildingTransparency, EC3 Resources. 2021. 71. Bre, IMPACT. 2021. 72. E2Co2Cero, Qué es E2CO2Cero? 2018. 73. Strain, L., McDade, E., and Ferriss, L., CARE Tool: Carbon Avoided Retrofit Estimator. 2023. 74. Hwang, S.-J., Seismic Retrofitting Program of School Buildings in Taiwan. 2021, NARSLabs: Recent Advances on the Increase of Resilience and Sustainability of School Infrastructure. p. 49. 75. Salgado, R. A., Apul, D., and Guner, S., Life cycle assessment of seismic retrofit alternatives for reinforced concrete frame buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 2020. 28: p. 101064. 76. M. Baradaran Shoraka, K. J. E. T. Y. Y. and Liel, A. B., Collapse Assessment of Non-Ductile, Retrofitted and Ductile Reinforced Concrete Frames. ACI Symposium Publication. 297. 77. Chang, J. H., Huang, K.-T., and Wang, J. C., Energy performance of school roofing materials in hot and humid climates. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2023. 19: p. e02586. 78. Lai, C.-M. and Wang, Y.-H., Energy-Saving Potential of Building Envelope Designs in Residential Houses in Taiwan. Energies, 2011. 4. 79. Somasundaram, S., Thangavelu, S. R., and Chong, A., Improving building efficiency using low-e coating based retrofit double glazing with solar films. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2020. 171: p. 115064. 80. American Energy Innovation, C., The Case for Low-e Windows. 2013, American Energy Innovation Council. 81. Lawrie, Linda, K., and Drury, C. B., Development of Global Typical Meteorological Years (TMYx). 2023. 82. ISO, ISO 14040:2006 - Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework. 2006, International Organization for Standardization: Geneva. 83. Assessment of Embodied Carbon Footprint of an Educational Building in Pakistan Using Building Information Modeling (BIM), in Collaboration and Integration in Construction, Engineering, Management and Technology, S. M. Ahmed, et al., Editors. 2021, Springer International Publishing. p. 235--239. 84. EN 15978:2011 Sustainability of Construction Works - Assessment of Environmental Performance of Buildings - Calculation Method. 2011, European Committee for Standardization (CEN): Brussels, Belgium. 85. Young-su Shin, K. C., BIM Application to Select Appropriate Design Alternative with Consideration of LCA and LCCA. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015. 2015: p. 14 pages. 86. Jui-Sheng, C. and Kuan-Chih, Y., Life cycle carbon dioxide emissions simulation and environmental cost analysis for building construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015. 101: p. 137-147. 87. Hsiao, F.-P., Chung, L.-L., Yeh, Y.-K., Chien, W.-Y., Shen, W.-C., Chiou, T.-C., Chow, T.-K., Chao, Y.-F., Weng, P.-W., Yang, Y.-S., Chu, Y.-L., Tu, Y.-S., Chai, J.-F., and Hwang, S.-J., Technology Handbook for Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of School Buildings. 2013, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering. 88. Hwang, R. L., Lin, T. P., and Kuo, N. J., Field experiments on thermal comfort in campus classrooms in Taiwan. Energy and Buildings, 2006. 38(1): p. 53-62. 89. Hwang, R.-L. and Cheng, M.-J., Field Survey on Human Thermal Comfort Reports in Air-Conditioned Offices in Taiwan. The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 2007. 107: p. 8-13. 90. Hertz, K. D. and Bagger, A. CO 2 emissions from super-light structures. 2010. 91. Calculations of embodied and operational carbon of double and triple glazed windows. 2022: Brussel, Belgium. p. 3. 92. Seo, M., CO2 Emissions Comparison of Precast and Cast-In-Place Concrete: Case Study, in College of Built Environment. 2020, University of Washington: Seattle, WA. 93. Institute, I. T. R., Carbon Footprint Information Platform. 2023, Ministry of Environment R.O.C.: Taipei, Taiwan. 94. Data Explorer. The largest database of vetted emission factors. Open to all. 2019, Climatiq Technologies GmbH: Berlin, Germany. 95. TCRI, 2023.11 Trend Analysis. 2023, Taiwan Construction Research Institute. 96. Ministry of Labor , R. o. C. T., Major Labor and Economic Indicators. 2023. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94245 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 建築業之碳排放與永續性近年來引起許多關注,居住環境的老化亦成為全球許多都市迫切需要解決的問題。針對現有建物進行翻新和補強是拆除重建以外之常見手段,透過能源翻新以減少建築能耗,或是進行耐震補強延長建築物的壽命並提升安全性。有關建築之碳排分析需要詳細的施工信息,如材料數量與施工設備等數據輸入。部分現有之分析工具利用建築資訊模型以簡化此過程,但多為新建工程設計,不涉及進行補強工程之前置作業或額外施工過程,例如混凝土表層移除和部分構件拆除等工項。因此,本論文提出了針對耐震補強和能源翻新工程進行生命週期評估之分析架構與工具。首先,基於建築資訊模型進行材料數量估算,進行包括生產、施工、運營和終端階段(從搖籃到墳墓)的生命週期評估。同時透過Rhinoceros進行建築能耗模擬,評估施工成本和年電費節省量,估算翻新策略之投資回報期。本研究以台灣一所學校建築作為案例,考慮了三種耐震補強策略(柱加固、翼牆和剪力牆)和兩種能源翻新策略(屋頂隔熱和低輻射窗),共六種組合進行演示。分析結果包含生命週期之碳排放、施工成本、施工與營運能耗、投資回報期等,並提供施工進度表。除了以摘要表和詳細計算表呈現,亦在Revit之3D模型中進行數據之可視化。本研究提出之分析架構與工具可協助使用者從永續性、經濟性與工期等角度評估不同建物翻新和補強策略。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The construction industry significantly contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. Retrofitting is a promising solution, as replacing some elements is more sustainable than reconstructing entire buildings. Energy retrofitting reduces energy consumption as a major source of emissions, while seismic retrofitting prevents damage to aging buildings, especially in seismic-prone areas, reducing the need for demolition and reconstruction. Integrating these retrofitting methods extend building lifespans and offer mutual protection, which can enhance sustainability, economics, and time-efficiency.
Current assessment methods often focus on new constructions which may not suit retrofitting projects that involve the additional preconstruction processes like concrete covering removal and partial demolitions of surrounding elements. Existing tools allow adaptation for retrofitting projects but require detailed construction information like material quantities and involved equipment, as well as manual data input. Therefore, this thesis presents a life cycle assessment (LCA) tool specifically developed for integrated seismic and energy retrofitting projects. The tool assesses life cycle carbon emissions, construction costs, electricity savings, and payback periods, and provides a construction schedule. BIM-based software is used to improve the effectiveness of the tool. The workflow was initially designed considering six combinations of three seismic retrofitting strategies (jacketing column, wing wall, and shear wall) and two energy retrofitting strategies (foam concrete roof and low-e windows). The main materials, including concrete, steel bars, foam concrete. and windows, were focused. Primary quantities were retrieved directly from Revit, while the quantities associated with preconstruction processes were estimated from provided equations in Excel, set according to the construction standard. Electricity use intensity (EUI) was simulated in Rhinoceros and set to export to an Excel sheet. This ensured that the tool had considered all related processes during construction and electricity spent during the operation period, to complete a cradle-to-grave LCA that includes the production, construction, operation, and end-of-life stages. The construction cost and annual electricity cost savings were estimated for the payback period calculation afterwards. Furthermore, the construction schedule was provided by estimating material quantities and provided productivity rate. All results were then shown in Excel sheet, as well as in Revit for 3D model visualization and data in each retrofitting element. The ability of the developed tool was demonstrated using a school building in Taiwan as a case study. Revit, Rhinoceros, and Excel accelerated the typically time-consuming data input process. Ultimately, the results in both reports and 3D models support decision-making during the design process by considering sustainability, economics, and construction time. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-15T16:25:10Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-15T16:25:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | THESIS ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE I
ACKNOWLEDGMENT II 摘要 III ABSTRACT IV CONTENTS VI LIST OF FIGURES IX LIST OF TABLES XII CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 13 1.1. Background 13 1.2. Scope and objectives of the research 14 1.3. Organization 15 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 16 2.1. Introduction 16 2.2. Retrofitting of Existing Building 16 2.3. Life cycle analysis 17 2.3.1. Life cycle carbon emission 17 2.3.2. Life cycle cost analysis 18 2.3.3. BIM Integration 18 2.3.4. Existing tools 19 2.4. Concluding remarks 20 CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY 22 3.1. Introduction 22 3.2. Retrofit strategies considered 22 3.2.1. Seismic retrofit strategies 22 3.2.2. Energy retrofit strategies 25 3.3. Material quantification analysis 27 3.4. Energy consumption analysis 29 3.5. Life cycle carbon emission 29 3.6. Life cycle cost analysis 31 3.7. Data collection 32 3.7.1. Activity data 32 3.7.2. Emission factors 37 3.7.3. Unit cost 37 3.8. Proposed framework 38 3.8.1. Workflow 38 3.8.2. Retrofitting Options Selection 39 3.8.3. Material quantification analysis 40 3.8.4. Energy consumption analysis 42 3.8.5. Lifecycle carbon emission calculation 43 3.8.6. Lifecycle cost calculation 43 3.8.7. Evaluation Report and Visualization 44 3.9. Concluding remarks 46 CHAPTER 4 CASE STUDY 47 4.1. Introduction 47 4.2. Background detail 47 4.2.1. Characteristics and properties of the building 47 4.2.2. Retrofitting scenarios 50 4.3. Implementation process 53 4.4. Result 56 4.4.1. Model visualization 56 4.4.2. Report 58 4.5. Discussion 68 4.5.1. Material quantity 68 4.5.2. Energy Use Intensity 68 4.5.3. Carbon emissions 69 4.5.4. Construction cost, operating electricity cost, and payback period 70 4.5.5. Construction schedule 71 4.5.6. Overall results 72 4.6. Concluding remarks 73 CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS 74 5.1. Conclusions 74 5.2. Limitations and future work 75 REFERENCE 77 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 生命週期評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 建築信息模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 能源翻新 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 抗震翻新 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 碳排放計算 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Carbon emission calculations | en |
| dc.subject | Energy retrofit | en |
| dc.subject | Life cycle assessment | en |
| dc.subject | Building Information Model | en |
| dc.subject | Seismic retrofit | en |
| dc.title | 基於建築資訊模型進行能源與耐震補強工程之生命週期評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | BIM-Based Life Cycle Assessment for Integrated Energy and Seismic Retrofit of Existing Buildings | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 詹瀅潔;謝尚賢 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Ying-Chieh Chan;Shang-Hsien Hsieh | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 生命週期評估,碳排放計算,抗震翻新,能源翻新,建築信息模型, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Life cycle assessment,Carbon emission calculations,Seismic retrofit,Energy retrofit,Building Information Model, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 82 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202403570 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-12 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2026-09-01 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 土木工程學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf Until 2026-09-01 | 3.82 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
