請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94081完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 劉好迪 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Adrian Rauchfleisch | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 秦李欣 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Li-Xin Qin | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-14T16:35:43Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-15 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-08-13 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-08-07 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Aarøe, L. (2011). Investigating frame strength: The case of episodic and thematic frames. Political Communication, 28(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2011.568041
Allgaier, J. (2019). Science and environmental communication on YouTube: Strategically distorted communications in online videos on climate change and climate engineering. Frontiers in Communication, 4, 36. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00036 Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., & Ladwig, P. (2014). The “Nasty Effect”: Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12009 Antony, M. G., & Thomas, R. J. (2010). ‘This is citizen journalism at its finest’: YouTube and the public sphere in the Oscar Grant shooting incident. New Media & Society, 12(8), 1280–1296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810362492 Askanius, T., & Uldam, J. (2011). Online social media for radical politics: Climate change activism on YouTube. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 4(1/2), 69. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2011.041708 Babbie, E. R. (2020). The practice of social research. Cengage AU. Belotti, F., Donato, S., Bussoletti, A., & Comunello, F. (2022). Youth activism for climate on and beyond social media: Insights from FridaysForFuture-Rome. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(3), 718–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211072776 Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661 Blei, David M., Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 3(4–5): 993–1022. doi:10.1162/jmlr.2003.3.4-5.993 Bowe, B. J., & Makki, T. W. (2016). Muslim neighbors or an Islamic threat? A constructionist framing analysis of newspaper coverage of mosque controversies. Media, Culture & Society, 38(4), 540–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715613639 Calhoun, C. (2004). Information technology and the international public sphere. In D. Schuler & P. Day (Eds.), Shaping the network society: The new role of civil society in cyberspace (pp. 229–251). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Cammaerts, B., & Carpentier, N. (Eds.). (2006). Reclaiming the media: Communication rights and democratic media roles (1st ed.). Intellect Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36xvqrf Cardiffnlp/twitter-roberta-base-sentiment-latest. (2022). Hugging Face. https://huggingface.co/cardiffnlp/twitter-roberta-base-sentiment-latest Chen, K., Molder, A. L., Duan, Z., Boulianne, S., Eckart, C., Mallari, P., & Yang, D. (2022). How climate movement actors and news media frame climate change and strike: Evidence from analyzing Twitter and news media discourse from 2018 to 2021. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 194016122211064. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221106405 Chen, N.-H. (2020). Exploring the cognitive and emotional impact of online climate change videos on viewers. Sustainability, 12(22), 9571. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229571 Chung-hong Chan. (2023). Grafzahl: Fine-tuning transformers for text data from within R. Computational Communication Research, 5(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.5117/CCR2023.1.003.CHAN Damien Gayle. (2022, Oct 14). Just Stop Oil activists throw soup at Van Gogh’s Sunflowers. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/oct/14/just-stop-oil-activists-throw-soup-at-van-goghs-sunflowers David Crouch. (2018, Sep 1). The Swedish 15-year-old who’s cutting class to fight the climate crisis. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/sep/01/swedish-15-year-old-cutting-class-to-fight-the-climate-crisis De Moor, J., De Vydt, M., Uba, K., & Wahlström, M. (2021). New kids on the block: Taking stock of the recent cycle of climate activism. Social Movement Studies, 20(5), 619–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1836617 De Moor, J. Uba, K., Wahlström, M., Wennerhag, M., and De Vydt, M. (eds.) (2020). Protest for a future II: Composition, mobilization and motives of the participants in Fridays for Future climate protests on 20–27 September, 2019, in 19 cities around the world. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1397070&dswid=-8404 De Swert, K. (2012). Calculating inter-coder reliability in media content analysis using Krippendorff’s Alpha. Center for Politics and Communication, 15(3), 1-15. Extinction Rebellion. (2023). This is an emergency. https://rebellion.global/ Feezell, J. T., Glazier, R. A., & Boydstun, A. E. (2021). Framing, identity, and responsibility: Do episodic vs. thematic framing effects vary by target population? Politics, Groups, and Identities, 9(2), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1584751 Freeman, B., & Chapman, S. (2007). Is “YouTube” telling or selling you something? Tobacco content on the YouTube video-sharing website. Tobacco Control, 16(3), 207–210. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2007.020024 Gamson, W. A., Wolfsfeld, G. (1993). Movements and media as interacting systems. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528(1), 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716293528001009 Gitlin, T. (1980), The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the new left, Berkeley/London: University of California Press. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Gross, K. (2008). Framing persuasive appeals: Episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Political Psychology, 29(2), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00622.x Hadden, J. (2015). Networks in contention. Cambridge University Press. Hart, P. S. (2011). One or many? The influence of episodic and thematic climate change frames on policy preferences and individual behavior change. Science Communication, 33(1), 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547010366400 Hinnant, A., Subramanian, R., & Young, R. (2016). User comments on climate stories: Impacts of anecdotal vs. scientific evidence. Climatic Change, 138(3–4), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1759-1 Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, Ch.L. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 53–78. Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading. Iyengar, S. (1996). Framing responsibility for political issues. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0002716296546001006 Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. University of Chicago Press. Jack Shepherd. (2024, Feb 26). 23 Essential YouTube statistics you need to know in 2024. Social Shepherd. https://thesocialshepherd.com/blog/youtube-statistics#:~:text=YouTube%20has%202.70%20billion%20monthly,122%20million%20users%20per%20day. Janowitz, M. (1975). Professional models in journalism: The gatekeeper and the advocate. Journalism quarterly, 52(4), 618-626. Jenkins, H., S. Shresthova, L. Gamber-Thompson, N. Kligler-Vilenchik, and A. Zimmerman. (2016). By any media necessary: The new youth activism. New York: New York University Press. John McCormick. (1989). The global environmental movement. Belhaven Press. Joshua Nevett. (2023, Dec 23). Prevent: Rise in climate activists referred to anti-terror scheme. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-67665218 Just Stop Oil [@JustStop_Oil]. (n.d.). Tweets [Twitter profile]. Twitter. Retrieved April 16, 2024, from https://twitter.com/JustStop_Oil Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 4, 362-277. Kielbowicz, R.B., & Scherer, C. (1986). The role of the press in the dynamics of social movements. In Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change (pp. 71-96). Rucht, D. (2004). The quadruple ‘A’: Media strategies of protest movements since the 1960s. In Donk W, Loader B, Nixon P, Rucht D (Eds.), Cyberprotest (pp. 29–56). London: Routledge. Kitschelt, H. P. (1986). Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti-Nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 16(1), 57–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712340000380X Kleres, J., & Wettergren, Å. (2017). Fear, hope, anger, and guilt in climate activism. Social Movement Studies, 16(5), 507–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1344546 Literat, I., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2019). Youth collective political expression on social media: The role of affordances and memetic dimensions for voicing political views. New Media & Society, 21(9), 1988–2009. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819837571 McCambridge, L. (2022). Describing the voice of online bullying: An analysis of stance and voice type in YouTube comments. Discourse, Context & Media, 45, 100552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100552 Mede, N. G., & Schroeder, R. (2024). The “Greta Effect” on social media: A systematic review of research on thunberg’s impact on digital climate change communication. Environmental Communication, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2024.2314028 Medhat, W., Hassan, A., & Korashy, H. (2014). Sentiment analysis algorithms and applications: A survey. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 5(4), 1093–1113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2014.04.011 Molotch, H., & Lester, M. (1974). News as purposive behavior: on the strategic use of routine events, accidents, and scandals. American Sociological Review, 39, 101–112. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094279 MoritzLaurer/deberta-v3-large-zeroshot-v2.0. (n.d). Hugging Face. https://huggingface.co/MoritzLaurer/deberta-v3-large-zeroshot-v2.0 Damien Gayle. (2022, Oct 14). Just Stop Oil activists throw soup at Van Gogh’s Sunflowers. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/oct/14/just-stop-oil-activists-throw-soup-at-van-goghs-sunflowers Nives Dolsak., & Aseem Prakash. (2019, Sept 14). Climate strikes: What they accomplish and how they could have more impact. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/prakashdolsak/2019/09/14/climate-strikes-what-they-accomplish-and-how-they-could-have-more-impact/ Olesen, T. (2022). Greta Thunberg’s iconicity: Performance and co-performance in the social media ecology. New Media & Society, 24(6), 1325–1342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820975416 Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press. Park, C. S., Liu, Q., & Kaye, B. K. (2021). Analysis of ageism, sexism, and ableism in user comments on YouTube Videos about climate activist Greta Thunberg. Social Media + Society, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211036059 Parks, L., Della Porta, D., & Portos, M. (2023). Environmental and climate activism and advocacy in the EU. In T. Rayner, K. Szulecki, A. J. Jordan, & S. Oberthür (Eds.), Handbook on European Union Climate Change Policy and Politics (pp. 98–112). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789906981.00018 Pearce, W., Niederer, S., Özkula, S. M., & Sánchez Querubín, N. (2019). The social media life of climate change: Platforms, publics, and future imaginaries. WIREs Climate Change, 10(2), e569. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.569 Rauchfleisch, A. (2017). The public sphere as an essentially contested concept: A co-citation analysis of the last 20 years of public sphere research. Communication and the Public, 2(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047317691054 Rauchfleisch, A., & Kaiser, J. (2020). The German far-right on YouTube: An analysis of user overlap and user comments. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(3), 373–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.179969 Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Tingley, D. (2019). stm: An R Package for Structural Topic Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 91(2). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v091.i02 Rucht, D. (2004). The quadruple ‘A’: Media strategies of protest movements since the 1960s. In Donk W, Loader B, Nixon P, Rucht D (Eds.), Cyberprotest (pp. 29–56). London: Routledge. Serrano, M. Á., Boguñá, M., & Vespignani, A. (2009). Extracting the multiscale backbone of complex weighted networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(16), 6483–6488. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808904106 Smith, A., Toor S. & Van Kessel, P. (2018). Many turn to YouTube for children’s content, news, how-to lessons. (2018. November 7). Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/11/07/many-turn-to-youtube-for-childrens-content-news-how-to-lessons/ Snow, D. A., Vliegenthart, R., & Ketelaars, P. (2018). The framing perspective on social movements: Its conceptual roots and architecture. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, H. Kriesi, & H. J. McCammon (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (1st ed., pp. 392–410). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119168577.ch22 Stieglitz S., Brockmann T., Xuan L. D. (2012, July). Usage of social media for political communication. 16th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Traag, V. A. (2015). Faster unfolding of communities: Speeding up the Louvain algorithm. Physical Review E, 92(3), 032801. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.032801 Traag, V. A., Waltman, L., & Van Eck., N. J. (2019). From Louvain to Leiden: Guaranteeing well-connected communities. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1-12. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decision and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458. Uldam, J., & Askanius, T. (2013). Online civic cultures? Debating climate change activism on YouTube. International Journal of Communication, 7, 20. Vertovec, S., & Cohen, R. (Eds.). (2002). Conceiving cosmopolitanism: Theory, context, and practice. Oxford University Press. Vu, H. T., Blomberg, M., Seo, H., Liu, Y., Shayesteh, F., & Do, H. V. (2021). Social media and environmental activism: Framing climate change on Facebook by global NGOs. Science Communication, 43(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020971644 Wahlström, M., Sommer, M., Kocyba, P., de Vydt, M., De Moor, J., Davies, S. et al. (2019). Protest for a future: composition, mobilization and motives of the participants in fridays for future climate protests on 15 march, 2019 in 13 European cities. https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/6571/ Williams, H. T. P., McMurray, J. R., Kurz, T., & Hugo Lambert, F. (2015). Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 32, 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.006 Wolfsfeld, G. (1984). Symbiosis of press and protest: An exchange analysis. Journalism Quarterly, 61(3), 550–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908406100311 Xu, W. W., Park, J. Y., Kim, J. Y., & Park, H. W. (2016). Networked cultural diffusion and creation on YouTube: An analysis of YouTube memes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(1), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1127241 Yan, R., & Gao, G. (2020). Topic analysis by exploring headline information. In Web Information Systems Engineering–WISE 2020: 21st International Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 20–24, 2020, Proceedings, Part II 21 (pp. 129-142). Springer International Publishing. Yoo, J. H., & Kim, J. (2012). Obesity in the new media: A content analysis of obesity videos on YouTube. Health Communication, 27(1), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.569003 Zamponi, L., Baukloh, A. C., Bertuzzi, N., Chironi, D., Della Porta, D., & Portos, M. (2022). (Water) bottles and (street) barricades: The politicisation of lifestyle-centred action in youth climate strike participation. Journal of Youth Studies, 25(6), 854–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2022.2060730 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94081 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 2018年被廣泛認為是新氣候行動主義的開端，以Greta Thunberg的氣候罷課運動為開端。在這之後，一些新氣候行動主義組織，如 Extinction Rebellion、Just Stop Oil也因為他們激進的公民不服從運動，獲得了大量的媒體報道和公眾關注度。然而，這些有爭議的氣候抗議形式，在獲得關注的同時，也可能引起了公眾的反感。
本研究以YouTube作為主要研究平台，試圖探索YouTube上的新氣候行動主義社群。社群中的視頻內容和觀眾反應也將被進一步探索，以期瞭解YouTube上新氣候行動主義社群的完整傳播樣貌。 研究發現，在YouTube的新氣候行動主義社群網路中，極右翼和保守派媒體佔據中間位置，而新氣候行動主義組織，如Just Stop Oil和Extinction Rebellion則在整個社群網路中處於較為邊緣的位置。在視頻內容方面，社群中的視頻大多呈現採用激進抗議形式的氣候活動家和民眾，產生衝突的現場畫面，只有少數的集群產出了對新氣候主義較為正面的視頻內容。此研究還進一步對視頻框架進行研究，結果顯示，社群中的大多數視頻採用情節框架，以導致集群中的觀眾反應多為負面。然而，這個研究還發現，比起情節框架，採用主題框架的視頻內容能顯著提高觀眾對新氣候主義的正面情緒。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 2018 is widely regarded as the beginning of new climate activism, marked by Greta Thunberg's school strike for climate change. Following this, organizations like Extinction Rebellion and Just Stop Oil gained significant media attention and public interest through acts of civil disobedience. However, these controversial protests, while drawing media coverage, may also provoke public backlash.
This study uses YouTube as the research platform to explore the social network of the new climate activism community. Videos and audience reactions are further assessed to explore the new climate activism community on YouTube. The study found that in the YouTube new climate activism community, far-right and conservative media occupy central positions, while organizations like Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion are situated on the edge. The video content primarily consists of radical protests or confrontations between activists and the public, with only a few clusters producing more positive videos about climate activism. Further analysis of frames reveals that most videos in the community adopt episodic frames, leading to many negative emotional reactions from the audience. However, the study also found that compared to episodic frames, thematic frames significantly enhance audiences' positive reactions to new climate activism. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-14T16:35:43Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-14T16:35:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 i
Abstract ii 目次 Index iii 圖次 Figure Index v 表次 Figure Index vi I. Introduction 1 II. Literature Review 6 1. Environmental and climate activism 6 1.1 A brief history of the environmental movement and climate movement 6 1.2 Digital perspective of climate activism 8 1.3 New climate activism: what is ‘new’? 10 2. Activism and media 12 2.1 Why is the media important for activism? 12 2.2 Framing effect: thematic versus episodic frames 14 2.3 Climate activism framed by media 16 3. New Climate activism demonstrated on YouTube 17 3.1 YouTube 17 3.2 Public Engagement on YouTube 18 3.3 Public engagement in climate change on YouTube 19 III. Research Question 22 IV. Research Design and Methods 25 1. Research Design 25 2. Methods and Data 27 2.1 Comment overlap analysis 27 2.2 Topic model 29 2.3 Content analysis 31 2.3 Sentiment analysis 34 V. Result 36 1. New climate activism community 36 2. Video frame and audience emotion 52 2.1 Video frame 52 2.2 Audience Emotion 64 2.3 Frame and Emotion 66 VI. Discussion 71 VII. Research Limitations & Future Research 76 Reference 78 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 新氣候行動主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | YouTube | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 框架 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 評論重疊分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 主題模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 情感分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 內容分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | YouTube | en |
| dc.subject | Content analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Sentiment analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Topic model | en |
| dc.subject | Comment overlap analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Frame | en |
| dc.subject | New climate activism | en |
| dc.title | YouTube上的新氣候行動主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | New Climate Activism on YouTube | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝吉隆;許詩嫻 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Ji-Lung Hsieh;Shih-Hsien Hsu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 新氣候行動主義,YouTube,框架,評論重疊分析,主題模型,情感分析,內容分析, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | New climate activism,YouTube,Frame,Comment overlap analysis,Topic model,Sentiment analysis,Content analysis, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 87 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202403800 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-11 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 新聞研究所 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 新聞研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 6.08 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。