請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94060完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 荷世平 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Shih-Ping Ho | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 賴王澤鋐 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | WANG ZE-HONG LAI | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-14T16:29:28Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-15 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-08-13 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-08-09 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Acar, S., Aşıcı, A. A., & Yeldan, A. E. (2022). Potential effects of the EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism on the Turkish economy. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(6), 8162-8194.
Ambec, S. (2022). The european union’s carbon border adjustment mechanism: challenges and perspectives. Bacchus, J. (2021). Legal issues with the European carbon border adjustment mechanism. CATO Briefing Paper, 125, 3-6. Bellora, C., & Fontagné, L. (2022). EU in search of a WTO-compatible carbon border adjustment mechanism. Available at SSRN 4168049. Bellora, C., & Fontagné, L. (2023). EU in search of a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. Energy Economics, 123, 106673. Benson, E., Majkut, J., Reinsch, W. A., & Steinberg, F. (2022). Analyzing the European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). Busch, T., & Lewandowski, S. (2018). Corporate carbon and financial performance: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 22(4), 745-759. Cicala, S., Hémous, D., & Olsen, M. G. (2022). Adverse selection as a policy instrument: unraveling climate change (No. w30283). National Bureau of Economic Research. Cosbey, A., Droege, S., Fischer, C., & Munnings, C. (2019). Developing guidance for implementing border carbon adjustments: lessons, cautions, and research needs from the literature. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. Droege, S., & Fischer, C. (2020). Pricing carbon at the border: Key questions for the EU. ifo DICE Report, 18(01), 30-34. Eicke, L., Weko, S., Apergi, M., & Marian, A. (2021). Pulling up the carbon ladder? Decarbonization, dependence, and third-country risks from the European carbon border adjustment mechanism. Energy Research & Social Science, 80, 102240. European Parliament. (2020). Economic assessment of Carbon Leakage and Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Preliminary results for the EU27 and the UK. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/603501/EXPO_BRI(2020)603501_EN.pdf European Parliament. (2020). Towards a feasible carbon border adjustment mechanism: Explanation and analysis of the European Parliament’s proposal. European Parliament Technical Report. Fischer, C., & Fox, A. K. (2012). Comparing policies to combat emissions leakage: Border carbon adjustments versus rebates. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 64(2), 199-216. Fowlie, M. L., & Reguant, M. (2022). Mitigating emissions leakage in incomplete carbon markets. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 9(2), 307-343. Gallego-Álvarez, I., Segura, L., & Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2015). Carbon emission reduction: The impact on the financial and operational performance of international companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 149-159. Genedy, A., & Sakr, A. (2017). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance in developing countries. Case of Egypt. International Journal of Business and Economic Development (IJBED), 5(2). Gu, R., Guo, J., Huang, Y., & Wu, X. (2023). Impact of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism on economic growth and resources supply in the BASIC countries. Resources Policy, 85, 104034. Han, J. J., Kim, H. J., & Yu, J. (2016). Empirical study on relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in Korea. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 1, 61-76. Hong, M., Li, Z., & Drakeford, B. (2021). Do the green credit guidelines affect corporate green technology innovation? Empirical research from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1682. Kortum, S., & Weisbach, D. (2017). The design of border adjustments for carbon prices. National Tax Journal, 70(2), 421-446. Kuusi, T., Björklund, M., Kaitila, V., Kokko, K., Lehmus, M., Mechling, M., ... & Wang, M. (2020). Carbon border adjustment mechanisms and their economic impact on Finland and the EU. Leonelli, G. C. (2022). Practical obstacles and structural legal constraints in the adoption of ‘defensive’policies: comparing the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and the US Proposal for a Border Carbon Adjustment. Legal Studies, 42(4), 696-714. Lewandowski, S. (2017). Corporate carbon and financial performance: The role of emission reductions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(8), 1196-1211. Le, H., & Nguyen-Phung, H. T. (2024). Assessing the impact of environmental performance on corporate financial performance: A firm-level study of GHG emissions in Africa. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 47, 644-654. Lim, B., Hong, K., Yoon, J., Chang, J. I., & Cheong, I. (2021). Pitfalls of the eu’s carbon border adjustment mechanism. Energies, 14(21), 7303. Ma, J., & Kuo, J. (2021). Environmental self-regulation for sustainable development: Can internal carbon pricing enhance financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3517–3527. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2817 Mehling, M., & Ritz, R. A. (2020). Going beyond default intensities in an EU carbon border adjustment mechanism. University of Cambridge, Faculty of Economics. Metcalf, G. E. (2009). Designing a carbon tax to reduce US greenhouse gas emissions. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Yu, W. (2013). R-squared and the economy (No. w19017). National Bureau of Economic Research. Newman, N. S. (2022). The European Union’s CBAM: Is It an Effective Economic Climate Policy?. Pepperdine Policy Review, 14(1), 3. Nollet, J., Filis, G., & Mitrokostas, E. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach. Economic Modelling, 52, 400-407. Olhoff, A., & Christensen, J. M. (2020). Emissions gap report 2020. Overland, I., & Sabyrbekov, R. (2022). Know your opponent: Which countries might fight the European carbon border adjustment mechanism?. Energy Policy, 169, 113175. Parker, D., & Kirkpatrick, C. (2012). Measuring regulatory performance. The economic impact of. Perdana, S., & Vielle, M. (2022). Making the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism acceptable and climate friendly for least developed countries. Energy Policy, 170, 113245. Quick, R. (2021). Carbon Border Adjustment. ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, 23(4), 549-597. Quirion, P. (2022). Output-based allocation and output-based rebates: a survey. In Handbook on trade policy and climate change (pp. 94-107). Edward Elgar Publishing. Ren, Y., Liu, G., & Shi, L. (2023). The EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism will exacerbate the economic-carbon inequality in the plastic trade. Journal of Environmental Management, 332, 117302. Shapiro, J. S. (2021). The environmental bias of trade policy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(2), 831-886. Steenkamp, L. A. (2021). A classification framework for carbon tax revenue use. Climate Policy, 21(7), 897-911. Sun, X., Mi, Z., Cheng, L., Coffman, D. M., & Liu, Y. (2024). The carbon border adjustment mechanism is inefficient in addressing carbon leakage and results in unfair welfare losses. Fundamental Research, 4(3), 660-670. Villoria-Sáez, P., Tam, V. W., del Río Merino, M., Arrebola, C. V., & Wang, X. (2016). Effectiveness of greenhouse-gas Emission Trading Schemes implementation: a review on legislations. Journal of cleaner production, 127, 49-58. Widianto, I., & Sari, D. P. (2020). The Effect of Environmental Performance, Leverage and Company Size Towards Carbon Emission Disclosure on Rated Proper Company in 2015-2018: English. Journal of Accounting, Entrepreneurship and Financial Technology (JAEF), 1(2), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.37715/jaef.v1i2.1464 Zhong, J., & Pei, J. (2022). Beggar thy neighbor? On the competitiveness and welfare impacts of the EU's proposed carbon border adjustment mechanism. Energy Policy, 162, 112802. Zhong, J., & Pei, J. (2024). Carbon border adjustment mechanism: a systematic literature review of the latest developments. Climate Policy, 24(2), 228-242. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94060 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探討歐盟碳邊境調整機制(CBAM)對企業碳排放強度和財務績效的影響。透過對水泥、鋼鐵、鋁、化肥、氫氣及電力等產業的144家企業樣本進行固定效應模型分析,本研究檢驗了歐盟CBAM的實際效果及其對企業永續發展實踐的影響。研究結果顯示,即使在歐盟CBAM政策宣布但尚未完全實施的階段,其對企業行為已有顯著影響,尤其是在促進企業降低碳排放強度和提升財務績效方面。這表明政策宣布的前瞻性影響力足以促使企業提前採取行動,改善其碳管理績效,進而影響其財務績效。進一步的分析揭示了幾個關鍵見解,包括政策預告的重要性、提前準備對企業適應政策變化的重要性,以及清晰溝通政策信息對減少企業不確定性的重要性。研究還強調了積極回應氣候變化不僅可滿足企業的社會責任,亦可增強財務效益和市場競爭力。總而言之,本研究為理解歐盟CBAM的經濟和環境影響提供了實證證據,並為政策制定者和企業管理者在設計和實施永續政策時提供了實用的策略和見解。最後,本研究認為各國在制定環境規範時應更加迅速,並通過試行階段持續進行調整和完善,以為企業提供充足的準備時間,從而降低企業的適應成本。這樣的措施不僅有助於企業在追求經濟增長時考慮到環境保護的重要性,還能促進企業在追求經濟利益的同時,實現對地球環境的永續責任。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study aims to investigate the impact of the European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) on corporate carbon emission intensity and financial performance. By conducting a fixed-effects model analysis on a sample of 144 companies in industries such as cement, steel, aluminum, fertilizer, hydrogen, and electricity, the study examines the actual effects of the EU CBAM and its influence on corporate sustainability practices. The results show that even during the announcement phase of the EU CBAM policy, before its full implementation, there has been a significant impact on corporate behavior, particularly in promoting reductions in carbon emission intensity and enhancing financial performance. This indicates that the forward-looking influence of policy announcements is sufficient to prompt companies to take early actions, improve their carbon management performance, and subsequently affect their financial performance. Further analysis reveals several key insights, including the importance of policy forecasting, the critical nature of early preparation for companies to adapt to policy changes, and the importance of clearly communicating policy information to reduce corporate uncertainty. The study also emphasizes that actively responding to climate change not only fulfills corporate social responsibility but also enhances financial benefits and market competitiveness. Overall, this research provides empirical evidence for understanding the economic and environmental impacts of the EU CBAM, offering practical strategies and insights for policymakers and corporate managers in designing and implementing sustainable policies. Finally, the study suggests that countries should be more proactive in formulating environmental regulations, continually adjusting and improving through pilot phases to provide companies with sufficient preparation time, thereby reducing the adaptation costs for businesses. Such measures not only help companies consider the importance of environmental protection while pursuing economic growth but also promote corporate commitment to sustainable responsibility towards the global environment while achieving economic benefits. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-14T16:29:28Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-14T16:29:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝i
摘要ii Abstractiii 目次v 圖次vi 表次vii 第1章 緒論1 1.1 研究背景1 1.2 研究動機與目的1 1.3 論文架構3 第2章 文獻回顧5 2.1 氣候環境風險5 2.2 碳定價14 2.3 公司永續發展25 2.4 歐盟碳邊境調整機制31 第3章 研究設計方法40 3.1 計量實證研究法40 3.2 研究流程44 第4章 假說推導與實證研究設計46 4.1 假說推導46 4.2 實證模型49 4.3 模型變數與衡量52 第5章 實證結果與討論59 5.1 敘述性統計59 5.2 模型檢定61 5.3 假說一之實證結果與討論66 5.4 假說二之實證結果與討論73 5.5 策略意涵77 第6章 研究結論與建議80 6.1 研究結論80 6.2 研究建議81 參考文獻82 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 永續發展 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 碳邊境調整機制 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 計量經濟學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | ESG | en |
| dc.subject | Econometrics | en |
| dc.subject | Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism | en |
| dc.title | 歐盟碳邊境調整機制對公司碳管理效益的效益實證 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Empirical Analysis of the Benefits of EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on Corporate Carbon Management Benefits | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林正芳;許耀文 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Cheng-Fang Lin;Yao-Wen Hsu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 碳邊境調整機制,永續發展,計量經濟學, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism,ESG,Econometrics, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 86 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202403169 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-12 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.42 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
