請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93886完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 吳玲玲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Ling-Ling Wu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林俞均 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Chun Lin | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-09T16:11:23Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-10 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-08-09 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-08-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 侯正裕, & 尚榮安. (2018). 專注未必有用-從媒介特性及認知專注探索行動通訊app 的持續意圖. 行銷評論, 15(1), 167-191.
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS quarterly, 24(4), 665-694. Ahmad, R. M. (1999). Effectiveness of web-based virtual learning environments in business education: Focusing on basic skills training for information technology. Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Alavi, M., D. Leidner. (2001). Research commentary: Technology mediated learning– A call for greater depth and breadth of research. Inform. Systems Res. 12(1), 1-10. Alshardan, A., Goodwin, R., & Rampersad, G. (2016). A benefits assessment model of information systems for small organizations in developing countries. Computer and Information Science, 9. Andre Hanelt, Everlin Piccinini, Robert W. Gregory, Bjorn Hildebrandt, Lutz M. Kolbe (2015). Digital Transformation of Primarily Physical Industries – Exploring the Impact of Digital Trends on Business Models of Automobile Manufacturers. International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik Anohina, A. (2005). Analysis of the terminology used in the field of virtual learning. Educational Tech. Soc. 8(3), 91-102. Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1990). Methods of research in social psychology. Bachen, C. M., Hernández-Ramos, P., Raphael, C., & Waldron, A. (2016). How do presence, flow, and character identification affect players’ empathy and interest in learning from a serious computer game?. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 77-87. Baik, K. H. (2004). Two-Player Asymmetric Contests with Ratio-Form Contest Success Functions, Economic Inquiry, 42(4), 679-689. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173. Berman, S. J. (2012). Digital transformation: opportunities to create new business models. Strategy & Leadership, 40(2), 16-24 Bernard, R. M., P. C. Abrami, Y. Lou, E. Borokhowski, A. Wade, L. Woznoy, P. A. Wallet, M. Fiset, B. Huang. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of empirical literature. Rev. Educational Res. 74(3), 379-439. Bozanta, A., Kutlu, B., Nowlan, N., & Shirmohammadi, S. (2016). Effects of serious games on perceived team cohesiveness in a multi-user virtual environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 380-388. Cheng, H. N., Wu, W. M., Liao, C. C., & Chan, T. W. (2009). Equal opportunity tactic: Redesigning and applying competition games in classrooms. Computers & Education, 53(3), 866-876. Christy, K. R., & Fox, J. (2014). Leaderboards in a virtual classroom: A test of stereotype threat and social comparison explanations for women’s math performance. Computers & Education, 78, 66-77. Colwell, J., Grady, C., & Rhaiti, S. (1995). Computer games, self‐esteem and gratification of needs in adolescents. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 5(3), 195-206. Conti, R. (2001). Time flies: Investigating the connection between intrinsic motivation and the experience of time. Journal of personality, 69(1), 1-26. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Play and Intrinsic Rewards. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 15(3). Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. HarperPerennial, New York, 39. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. The masterminds series. New York: Basic Books. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Play and intrinsic rewards. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp.135-153). Springer, Dordrecht. Daft, R. L. (2008). The leadership experience (4th ed.). Mason, OH: SouthWestern, Cengage Learning. Dale, S. (2014). Gamification: Making work fun, or making fun of work? Business Information Review, 31(2), 82-90. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of applied social psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132. Deci, E. L., Betley, G., Kahle, J., Abrams, L., & Porac, J. (1981). When trying to win: Competition and intrinsic motivation. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 7(1), 79-83. Deci, E., and Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self- Determination in Human Behavior, New York: Springer. Deng, L., & Poole, M. S. (2010). Affect in web interfaces: A study of the impacts of web page visual complexity and order. MIS Quarterly, 711-730. Delone, W., & Mclean, E. (1992). Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3, 60-95. Demetrovics, Z., Urbán, R., Nagygyörgy, K., Farkas, J., Zilahy, D., Mervó, B., Reindl, A., Á goston, C., Kertész, A., Harmath, E. (2011). Why do you play? The development of the motives for online gaming questionnaire (MOGQ). Behav. Res. Methods, 43(3), 814-825. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining ‘‘Gamification’’. In Proceedings of MindTrek. Duan, Y., He, Q., Feng, W., Li, D., & Fu, Z. (2010). A study on e-learning take-up intention from an innovation adoption perspective: A case in China. Computers & Education, 55(1), 237-246. Dysvik, A., & Kuvaas, B. (2011). Intrinsic motivation as a moderator on the relationship between perceived job autonomy and work performance. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 20(3), 367-387. Epstein, J. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1992). Winning is not enough: The effects of competition and achievement orientation on intrinsic interest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(2), 128-138. Filsecker, M., & Hickey, D. T. (2014). A multilevel analysis of the effects of external rewards on elementary students’ motivation, engagement and learning in an educational game. Computers & Education, 75, 136–148. Francisco-Aparicio, A., Guti’errez-Vela, F., Isla-Montes, J., & Sanches, J. (2013). Gamification: Analysis and application. In V. Penichet (Ed.). New trends in interaction, virtual reality and modeling, human computer interaction series (pp.113–126). London: Springer-Verlag. Fu, F. L., Su, R. S., & Yu, S. C. (2009). EGameFlow: A scale to measure learners’enjoyment of e-learning games. Computers & Education, 52(1), 101-112. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Giannetto, D., Chao, J., & Fontana, A. (2013). Gamification in a social learning environment. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 10, 195-207. Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. Hilldale, USA, 1(2), 67-82. Glover, I. (2013, June). Play as you learn: gamification as a technique for motivating learners. In Edmedia+ innovate learning (pp. 1999-2008). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Grangeia, T. D. A. G., De Jorge, B., Cecílio-Fernandes, D., Tio, R. A., & de Carvalho-Filho, M. A. (2019). Learn+ fun! social media and gamification sum up to foster a community of practice during an emergency medicine rotation. Health Professions Education, 5(4), 321-335. Guo, Y.M., and Poole, M.S. Antecedents of flow in online shopping: A test of alternative models. Information Systems Journal, 19, 4 (2009), 369-390. Gupta, S., R. Bostrom. (2005). Research framework for collaborative e-learning in an end-user training context. Proc. 11th Americas Conf. Inform. Systems. Assoc. Inform. Systems, Atlanta. Gupta S, Bostrom R (2009) Technology-mediated learning: A comprehensive theoretical model. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems. 10(9), 686-714. Gustavsson, J. P., Jönsson, E. G., Linder, J., & Weinryb, R. M. (2003). The HP5 inventory: Definition and assessment of five health-relevant personality traits from a five-factor model perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(1), 69-89. Hallinan, M. T., & Williams, R. A. (1990). Students' characteristics and the peer- influence process. Sociology of education, 122-132. Hamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2013, June). Social Motivations To Use Gamification: An Empirical Study Of Gamifying Exercise. In ECIS (Vol. 105, No. 5, pp. 18-19). Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? –A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In Proceedings of the 47th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 3025-3034. Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & education, 80, 152-161. Haveman, R., & Wolfe, B. (1995). The Determinants of Children’s Attainments: A Review of Methods and Findings. Journal of Economic Literature, 33(4), 1829- 1878. American Economic Association. Heavin, C.,& Power, D. J. (2018). Challenges for digital transformation – towards a conceptual decision support guide for managers. Journal of Decision Systems, 27, 38-45 Hiltz, S. R. (1986). The virtual classroom: Using computer-mediated communication for university teaching. J. Comm. 36(2), 95-104. Hsu, C., and Lu, H. (2004). Why Do People Play on-Line Games? An Extended Tam with Social Influences and Flow Experience, Information & Management, 41(7), 853-868. Huotari, K., & Hamari, J. (2017). A definition for gamification: Anchoring gamification in the service marketing literature. Electronic Markets, 27(1), 21-31. Ina M. Sebastian, Martin Mocker, Jeanne W. Ross, Kate G. Moloney, Cynthia Beath, Nils O. Fonstad (2017). How Big Old Companies Navigate Digital Transformation. MIS Quarterly Executive, September 16(3). Jagušt, T., Botički, I., & So, H. J. (2018). Examining competitive, collaborative and adaptive gamification in young learners' math learning. Computers & education, 125, 444-457. Jarvenpaa, S., Leidner, D., Teigland, R., and Wasko, M. 2008. New Ventures in Virtual Worlds, MIS Quarterly, 32(2), 461-462. Jordine, T., Liang, Y., & Ihler, E. (2015). A mobile device based serious gaming approach for teaching and learning Java programming. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 9(1), 53-59. Jonassen, D. H. (1995). Computers as cognitive tools: Learning with technology, not from technology. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 6(2), 40-73. Jonassen, D. H., ed. (2004). Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. Jones, T. H., R. Paolucci. (1999). Research framework and dimensions for evaluating the effectiveness of educational technology systems on learning. J. Res. Comput. Ed. 32(1), 17-27. Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of Distance Education, 3rd ed. Routledge, London, UK. Knautz, K., Wintermeyer, A., Orszullok, L., & Soubusta, S. (2014). From know that to know how – providing new learning strategies for information literacy instruction. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 492, 417-426. Kohn, A. (1992). No Contest: A Case Against Competition. Houghton Mifflin, New York. Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2019). The rise of motivational information systems: A review of gamification literature. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 191-210. Kurt Sandkuhl, Holger Lehmann (2017). Digital Transformation in Higher Education- The Role of Enterprise Architectures and Portals. Digital Enterprise Computing. Lajoie, S. P., & Derry, S. J. (2013). A Middle Camp for (Un) intelligent Instructional Computing: An Introduction. In Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 9-20). Routledge. Lazowski, R. A., & Hulleman, C. S. (2016). Motivation interventions in education: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational research, 86(2), 602-640. Lee, J., & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in education: What, how, why bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2). Liu, D., Li, X., & Santhanam, R. (2013). Digital games and beyond: What happens when players compete?. Mis Quarterly, 111-124. Liu, D., Santhanam, R., & Webster, J. (2017). Toward Meaningful Engagement: a framework for design and research of Gamified information systems. MIS quarterly, 41(4). Lou, Y., P. C. Abrami, S. D’Apollonia. (2001). Small group and indi- vidual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Rev. Educational Res. 71(3) 449-521. Malone, T. (1981). Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction, Cognitive Science, 5(4), 333-369. McAuley, E., Duncan, T., & Tammen, V. V. (1987). Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60, 48-58. McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. New York: The Free Press. McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1958). A scoring manual for the achievement motive. In J. W. Atkinson (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action, and society (pp. 179-204). Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc. McGrath, R. E., Mitchell, M., Kim, B. H., & Hough, L. (2010). Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment. Psychological bulletin, 136(3), 450. Mekler, E. D., Brühlmann, F., Tuch, A. N., & Opwis, K. (2017). Towards understanding the effects of individual gamification elements on intrinsic motivation and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 525-534. Moncada, S. M., & Moncada, T. P. (2014). Gamification of learning in accounting education. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 14(3), 9-19. Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of experimental social psychology, 45(4), 867-872. Perry, N. E., Turner, J. C., & Meyer, D. K. (2006). Classrooms as contexts for motivating learning. In P. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 327–348). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Phan, M. H., Keebler, J. R., & Chaparro, B. S. (2016). The development and validation of the game user experience satisfaction scale (GUESS). Human factors, 58(8), 1217-1247. Piccoli, G., R. Ahmad, B. Ives. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quart. 25(4), 401-426. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital-game based learning. McGraw-Hill. Putz, L. M., Hofbauer, F., & Treiblmaier, H. (2020). Can gamification help to improve education? Findings from a longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 110, 106392. Qian, M., & Clark, K. R. (2016). Game-based learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 50-68. Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Elements of the competitive situation that affect intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(1), 24-33. Santhanam, R., Liu, D., & Shen, W. C. M. (2016). Research Note—Gamification of technology-mediated training: Not all competitions are the same. Information systems research, 27(2), 453-465. Santhanam, R., Sasidharan, S., & Webster, J. (2008). Using Self-Regulatory Learning to Enhance E-Learning-Based Information Technology Training. Information Systems Research, 19(1), 26-47. Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371-380. Schwarzer, Ralf & Jerusalem, Matthias & Weinman, J. & Wright, S. & Johnston, Marie. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. Measures in Health Psychology: A User's Portfolio. Causal and control beliefs Windsor. Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: a survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 14-31. Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2014). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. In Applications of flow in human development and education (pp. 475-494). Springer, Dordrecht. Shiau, W. L., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Lai, H. H. (2018). Examining the core knowledge on facebook. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 52-63. Simões, J., Redondo, R. D., & Vilas, A. F. (2013). A social gamification framework for a K-6 learning platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(2), 345-353. Snow, E. L., Allen, L. K., Jackson, G. T., & McNamara, D. S. (2015). Spendency: Students’ propensity to use system currency. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 25, 407-427. Stam, H. J., Radtke, H. L., & Lubek, I. (2000). Strains in experimental social psychology: A textual anaylsis of the development of experimentation in social psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 36(4), 365-382. Stansbury, J. A., & Earnest, D. R. (2017). Meaningful gamification in an industrial/organizational psychology course. Teaching of Psychology, 44(1), 38-45. Su, C. H., & Cheng, C. H. (2015). A mobile gamification learning system for improving the learning motivation and achievements. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 268-286. Suh, A., Cheung, C. M., Ahuja, M., & Wagner, C. (2017). Gamification in the workplace: The central role of the aesthetic experience. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34(1), 268-305. Susi, T., Johannesson, M., and Backlund, P. (2007). Serious Games: An Overview. Technical Report HS-IKI-TR-07-001, School of Humanities and Informatics, University of Skövde. Sweden. Tauer, J. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1999). Winning isn't everything: Competition, achievement orientation, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(3), 209-238. Tauer, J. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2004). The effects of cooperation and competition on intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 86(6), 849. Ulicsak, M., & Wright, M. (2010). Games in education: Serious games, FutureLab. Van Roy, R., & Zaman, B. (2018). Need-supporting gamification in education: An assessment of motivational effects over time. Computers & Education, 127, 283-297. Van Roy, R., & Zaman, B. (2018). Unraveling the ambivalent motivational power of gamification: A basic psychological needs perspective. International Journal of Human- computer Studies in press. Van Vugt, H. C., Hoorn, J. F., Konijn, E. A., & de Bie Dimitriadou, A. (2006). Affective affordances: Improving interface character engagement through Interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(9), 874-888. Weibel, D., Wissmath, B., Habegger, S., Steiner, Y., & Groner, R. (2008). Playing online games against computer-vs. human-controlled opponents: Effects on presence, flow, and enjoyment. Computers in human behavior, 24(5), 2274-2291. Weiner, B. (1980). The role of affect in rational (attributional) approaches to human motivation. Educational Researcher, 9, 4-11. Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Press. Wilson,W. J. (1987). The Truly Disadvantaged. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Xi, N., & Hamari, J. (2019). Does gamification satisfy needs? A study on the relationship between gamification features and intrinsic need satisfaction. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 210-221. Yee, N. (2006). Motivations for play in online games. CyberPsychology Behav. 9(6), 772-775. Yoo, Youngjin. (2010). Computing in Everyday Life: A Call for Research on Experiential Computing. MIS Quarterly, 34, 213-231. Young, M. F., Slota, S., Cutter, A. B., Jalette, G., Mullin, G., Lai, B., Simeoni, Z., Tran, M., Yukhymenko, M. (2012). Our princess is in another castle—A review of trends in serious gaming for education. Rev. Ed. Res. 82(1), 61-89. Zhang, P. (2008). Motivational affordances: Reasons for ICT design and use. Communications of the ACM, 51(11), 145-147. Zyda, M. (2005). From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. IEEE Computer Society Press, 38(9), 25-32. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93886 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 為了解線上學習遊戲化與學習意圖之間關係，以及學習中產生心流是否影響學習效果進行本研究。學習生態在疫情衝擊之下出現重大改變，為使學習者更專注在學習內容之上，遊戲化概念蔚為風氣。但遊戲化的加入也可能導致學習者將心思放在遊戲而非學習內容。我們預期透過遊戲輔以學習內容的方式，使學習者在不考慮學習成績的壓力之下享受學習的樂趣，並且在遊戲當中因為沉浸與愉快的體驗更使得學習者在學習意圖以及學習成果上有更好的表現。研究透過實驗法收集234名學生的學習資料，分析其於實驗中感受到的心流程度以及活動後的學習意圖。結果表明學生在遊戲情境之下確實能感受到心流，而遊戲中的競賽元素則不會導致學習者有心流程度的差異。學習意圖與學習成果並沒有因為遊戲的加入呈現顯著的上升，其中又以無競賽的學習組別受到的分心程度最高。遊戲組別的學習者感受到心流可以提升學習意圖，而競賽對於學習意圖的效果並不會因為心流的產生而有顯著的改變。希望透過本研究的發現給予教學者一些教學設計的靈感與應用方向。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study was conducted to understand the relationship between gamification of learning and learners’ intention to learn in an online environment, and whether the generation of flow in learning affects learning performance. Learning styles have changed significantly under the impact of the epidemic, and the concept of gamification has become popular in order to make learners focus more on learning content. However, the addition of gamification may also cause learners to focus on the game rather than the learning content. It is expected that by integrating games with learning content, learners can enjoy learning without the pressure of achieving better academic performance, and the immersive and enjoyable experience of playing games will lead to better results in terms of intention to learn and learning performance. The study collected data from 234 students and analyzed the level of flow during the experiment and their intentions to learn after the activity. The results showed that students did feel flow in the gaming context, but the competition elements of the game did not lead to differences in the flow states. Learners’ intention to learn and learning performance did not increase significantly with the addition of the game, and the no competition group experienced the highest level of distraction. Learners in the game group who perceived flow states could enhance their intention to learn, whereas the effect of competition on learners’ intention to learn did not change significantly due to the generation of flow. It is hoped that the findings of this study will provide some inspirations and directions for instructional design. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-09T16:11:23Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-09T16:11:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i
中文摘要 ii Abstract iii Table of Contents iv List of Figures vi List of Tables vii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Literature review 6 2.1 Technology-mediated learning 6 2.2 Gamification 7 2.3 Competition related features 10 2.4 Flow 11 2.5 Research model 17 Chapter 3. Methodology 18 3.1 Experimental design 18 3.2 Experimental material 18 3.2.1 Game setting 18 3.2.2 Lecture video 19 3.3 Procedure 25 3.4 Measurement 26 3.4.1 Flow 26 3.4.2 Intention to learn 27 3.5 Participants 28 Chapter 4 Results and Analysis 29 4.1 Factor analysis 29 4.2 Test of Hypotheses 31 4.3 Test of the Mediation Effect 36 Chapter 5 Conclusion 39 5.1 Conclusion and Implications 39 5.2 Limitations and Future research 41 References 44 Appendix A 54 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 遊戲化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 競賽 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 心流 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 學習意圖 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 學習成效 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | learning performance | en |
| dc.subject | gamification | en |
| dc.subject | competition | en |
| dc.subject | flow | en |
| dc.subject | intention to learn | en |
| dc.title | 探討遊戲化設計與線上學習意圖之關聯性：心流狀態之中介效應 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Explore the relationship between gamification and learners’ intention to learn in an online environment: the mediation effect of flow states | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 翁崇雄;蘇雅惠 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chorng-Shyong Ong;Yea-Huey Su | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 遊戲化,競賽,心流,學習意圖,學習成效, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | gamification,competition,flow,intention to learn,learning performance, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 60 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202402931 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-05 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 資訊管理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf | 1.81 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。