請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93462完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林楨家 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Jen-Jia Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 紀德鑫 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Te-Hsin Chi | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-01T16:15:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-02 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-08-01 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-07-27 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 又吉盛清 1997。《台灣今昔之旅》。魏廷朝譯。前衛出版社。
中華民國內政部 2022。市區道路及附屬工程設計規範。 中華民國交通部 2022。監理簡易資料查詢－機動車輛登記數。https://reurl.cc/EoqlVA。（引用日期：2023年09月02日） 中華民國交通部 2023。臺閩地區111年民眾日常使用運具狀況調查表。（引用日期：2023年11月02日） 交通部統計處 2023a。自用小客車使用狀況調查報告。 交通部統計處 2023b。機車使用狀況調查報告。 交通部運輸研究所 2022。2022年臺灣公路容量手冊。 呂千慈 2017。騎乘環境與站點分布對公共自行車租借量之影響分析。國立交通大學運輸與物流管理學系碩士論文。 林雨佑、張詩芸、陳曉威、吳政達、方德琳、張鎮宏 2022。機車解嚴革命中：年輕騎士爭路權，他們開啟哪些交通安全論爭。報導者。https://www.twreporter.org/a/the-rights-of-motorcycle-riders （引用日期：2024年05月23日） 林敬育 2014。從環境開發到環境正義：關西118外環道爭議。中央大學客家社會文化研究所碩士論文。 林泰丞、林群雄與熊博安 2019。機車盲點偵測輔助系統。科學與工程技術期刊。15(1): 53-61。 林宗弘、許耿銘、李俊穎 2021。移動的階級不平等：臺灣民眾的交通弱勢與交通事故風險初探。調查研究－方法與應用47: 113-166。 侯俐安、侯勝宗 2021。體檢行的正義：聯合報系願景工程與大學如何翻轉偏鄉的移動困境。都市交通36(1): 1-29。 張瑞津 1981。臺灣的水系網比值。國立臺灣師範大學地理學研究報告(7): 37-60。 報時光 2022。1984年忠孝西路機車止步！那些年收到的罰單。聯合線上公司。https://time.udn.com/udntime/story/122833/6410178 （引用日期：2024年05月23日） 陳明宏 2001。都市細部計畫道路尺度之研究。國立陽明交通大學運輸與物流管理學系碩士論文。 陳冠旭、黃士騰、李忠遠、朱珮芸、曾佩如 2021。運具溫室氣體排放及減碳措施效益推估參數精進之探討。交通部運輸研究所。 許家齊 2012。 市區道路微觀汽機車混合車流機率式跟車模式之研究.。國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文。 湯儒彥、邱佩諄 2005。公辦車輛事故鑑定組織與作業之檢討與展望。都市交通20(2): 43-61。 湯儒彥 2011。道路交通事故的路權本質探討。都市交通26(1): 39-49 黃士榮 1995。即將走入歷史 回首細說復興橋 當年兩位蔣總統上下班時 三步一崗五步一哨。民生報，03版。 臺北市政府交通局 2015。YouBike設站有準則 今後選點標準一致。https://www.dot.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=D739A9F6B5C0AB95&sms=72544237BBE4C5F6&s=9D0009D2FE920FAD （引用日期：2023年11月18日） 臺北市政府交通局 2022a。大貨車/聯結車專區。https://www.dot.gov.taipei/cp.aspx?n=180956B21422E411（引用日期：2024年06月20日） 臺北市政府交通局 2022b。臺北市 110 年交通事故分析報告。 臺北市政府交通局 2023a。中華民國 111 年臺北市交通統計年報。 臺北市政府交通局 2023b。臺北市 111 年交通事故分析報告。https://www-ws.gov.taipei/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvNjExL3JlbGZpbGUvMjgxOTQvOTA0NzYxNS84ZmEyNTMxNi03ZDZjLTQ0MjYtYmE0OS1jODFiMTIyNmVlYTEucGRm&n=6Ie65YyX5biCMTEx5bm05Lqk6YCa5LqL5pWF5YiG5p6Q5aCx5ZGKLnBkZg%3d%3d&icon=..pdf （引用日期：2023年11月02日） 臺北市交通管制工程處 2021。交通流量調查資料。https://www.bote.gov.taipei/cp.aspx?n=E0C93DC334AE8028。（引用日期：2022.11.26）。 臺北市交通管制工程處 2022。忠孝西路將於12月14日起開放機車23時至翌日6時通行。臺北市政府交通局新聞稿。https://www.dot.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=D739A9F6B5C0AB95&s=4F9955E3523DE9F6 （引用日期：2024年05月25日） 臺北市政府停車管理處 2023a。如何申請設置自行車停車架？https://pma.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=E860B620A78D1DAA&sms=87415A8B9CE81B16&s=D60AE61AFC7D361B （引用日期：2023年11月30日）。 臺北市政府停車管理處 2023b。腳踏車、電動輔助自行車、微型電動二輪車及個人行動器具，可以停放在機車停車格內嗎？https://pma.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=E860B620A78D1DAA&sms=87415A8B9CE81B16&s=71CF413CB4B23B50 （引用日期：2023年11月30日）。 蔡智發、莊依臻 2021。道路擁擠收費再分配之公平性分析－臺北都會區案例。運輸學刊33(2): 165-193。 聯合報報訊 1955。復興橋已落成 今行通車典禮嚴主席將親自剪綵 兩旁慢車道下月起整修。聯合報，03版。 聯合報報訊 1970。遵照 總統指示 中正路易名 聯忠孝路分列西東。聯合報，06版。 環境部氣候變遷署 2023。中華民國國家溫室氣體排放清冊報告。https://www.cca.gov.tw/information-service/publications/national-ghg-inventory-report/1851.html （引用日期：2024年6月21日） 鍾宛伶、陳昭志、劉家銘 2018。人本環境建設－人車(自行車)分道。鋪面工程16(2): 73-86。 蘇士鈞 2022。想過馬路？請爬高遁地：談台北車站前徒步的垂直向度。眼底城事。https://eyesonplace.net/2022/03/08/20090/ （引用日期：2024年05月23日） Aarts, L., & Van Schagen, I. (2006). Driving speed and the risk of road crashes: A review. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38(2): 215-224. Anciaes, P. R., Stockton, J., Ortegon, A., & Scholes, S. (2019). Perceptions of road traffic conditions along with their reported impacts on walking are associated with wellbeing. Travel Behaviour and Society, 15: 88-101. Arneson, R. (2002). Egalitarianism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/ (Download Date: 2023/7/12) Arnott, R., & Williams, P. (2017). Cruising for parking around a circle. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 104: 357-375. Barry, B. (1997). Sustainability and intergenerational justice. Theoria, 44(89): 43-64. Baumgartner, A., Schubert, I., Sohre, A., Tomic, U., Moser, C., & Burger, P. (2023). Toward a reduction of car-based leisure travel: An analysis of determinants and potential measures. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 17(8): 911-930. Beyer, F. R., & Ker, K. (2009). Street lighting for preventing road traffic injuries. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004728.pub2 (Download Date: 2024/7/3) Biswas, S., & Roychowdhury, K. (2022). Influence of heavy vehicle operation on walkability from pedestrians’ perspective in Krishnanagar Municipality, India. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(4): 2530-2545. Blumentrath, C., & Tveit, M. S. (2014). Visual characteristics of roads: A literature review of people’s perception and Norwegian design practice. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 59: 58-71. Brauers, W. K. M., Zavadskas, E. K., Peldschus, F., & Turskis, Z. (2008). Multi‐objective decision‐making for road design. Transport, 23(3): 183-193. Cao, Y., Wang, Y. X., & Yang, Z. Z. (2022). Planning method for urban subway park-and-ride station and parking berth. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 50(1): 79-87. Chen, T., Sze, N. N., Chen, S., & Labi, S. (2020). Urban road space allocation incorporating the safety and construction cost impacts of lane and footpath widths. Journal of Safety Research, 75: 222-232. Chepesiuk, R. (2005). Decibel hell: the effects of living in a noisy world. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/full/10.1289/ehp.113-a34 (Download date: 2023/10/31) Clayton, S., & Opotow, S. (2003). Justice and identity: Changing perspectives on what is fair. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4): 298-310. Corazza, M. V., D'Alessandro, D., Di Mascio, P., & Moretti, L. (2020). Methodology and evidence from a case study in Rome to increase pedestrian safety along home-to-school routes. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English edition), 7(5): 715-727. Creutzig, F., Javaid, A., Soomauroo, Z., Lohrey, S., Milojevic-Dupont, N., Ramakrishnan, A., Sethi, M., Liu, L., Niamir, L., Bren d’Amour, C., Weddige, U., Lenzi, D., Kowarsch, M., Arndt, L., Baumann, L., Betzien, J., Fonkwa, L., Huber, B., Mendez, E., Zausch, J. M. 2020. Fair street space allocation: ethical principles and empirical insights. Transport Reviews, 40(6): 711-733. Dai, B., Hudson, J. G., Ettelman, B., & Park, E. S. (2021). Influence of lane width on bus crashes. Transportation Research Record, 2675(2): 87-97. Dalal, J., Mohapatra, P. K., & Chandra Mitra, G. (2010). Prioritization of rural roads: AHP in group decision. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 17(2): 135-158. Davison, K. K., & Lawson, C. T. (2006). Do attributes in the physical environment influence children's physical activity? A review of the literature. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 3: 1-17. De Gruyter, C., Zahraee, S. M., & Young, W. (2022). Understanding the allocation and use of street space in areas of high people activity. Journal of Transport Geography, 101: 103339. De Vos, J., Singleton, P. A., & Gärling, T. (2022). From attitude to satisfaction: introducing the travel mode choice cycle. Transport Reviews, 42(2): 204-221. Dumbaugh, E., & Gattis, J. L. (2005). Safe streets, livable streets. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(3): 283-300. Dumbaugh, E., & King, M. (2018). Engineering livable streets: A thematic review of advancements in urban street design. Journal of Planning Literature, 33(4): 451-465. Easterbrook, D. J. (2016). Ch.9 Greenhouse gases. In Evidence-Based Climate Science: Second Edition. Amsterdam, Netherland: Elsevier, 163-173. Ekhaese, E. N., & Asinobi, A. A. (2023). Go-ahead urban liveability indicators (ULI) influence on residents’ well-being: a case for Lekki-Lagos, Nigeria. GeoJournal, 88(2): 2345-2364. Ernst, A., & Zibrak, J. D. (1998). Carbon monoxide poisoning. New England Journal of Medicine, 339(22): 1603-1608. FGSV – Road and Transportation Research Association (2006): Directives for the Design of Urban Roads (RASt). Cologne, Germany: German Road and Transportation Research Association (FGSV). (Translate in 2012) Florides, G. A., & Christodoulides, P. (2009). Global warming and carbon dioxide through sciences. Environment International, 35(2): 390-401. Foucault, M., & Miskowiec, J. (1986). Of other spaces. Diacritics, 16(1): 22-27. Giechaskiel, B., Maricq, M., Ntziachristos, L., Dardiotis, C., Wang, X., Axmann, H., Bergmann, A. & Schindler, W. (2014). Review of motor vehicle particulate emissions sampling and measurement: From smoke and filter mass to particle number. Journal of Aerosol Science, 67: 48-86. Goldstein, M. (2008). Carbon monoxide poisoning. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 34(6): 538-542. Gössling, S. (2016). Urban transport justice. Journal of Transport Geography, 54: 1-9. Gössling, S. (2020). Why cities need to take road space from cars-and how this could be done. Journal of Urban Design, 25(4): 443-448. Guo, Y., Yang, L., & Chen, Y. (2022). Bike share usage and the built environment: a review. Frontiers in Public Health, 10: 848169. Guzman, L. A., Oviedo, D., Arellana, J., & Cantillo-García, V. (2021). Buying a car and the street: Transport justice and urban space distribution. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 95: 102860. Gumprecht, B. (2007). The campus as a public space in the American college town. Journal of Historical Geography, 33(1), 72-103. Hall, S. (2012). Abstract. City, Street and Citizen: The Measure of the Ordinary. (1st ed.). London, United Kingdom: Routledge. Hananel, R., & Berechman, J. (2016). Justice and transportation decision-making: The capabilities approach. Transport Policy, 49: 78-85. Hassen, N., & Kaufman, P. (2016). Examining the role of urban street design in enhancing community engagement: A literature review. Health & Place, 41: 119-132. Heinen, E., & Buehler, R. (2019). Bicycle parking: a systematic review of scientific literature on parking behaviour, parking preferences, and their influence on cycling and travel behaviour. Transport Reviews, 39(5): 630-656. Hjorthol, R., & Fyhri, A. (2009). Do organized leisure activities for children encourage car-use?. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(2): 209-218. Hsueh, C., & Lin, J. J. (2023). Influential factors of the route choices of scooter riders: A GPS-based data study. Journal of Transport Geography, 113: 103719. Huang, H. F., Stewart, J. R., & Zegeer, C. V. (2002). Evaluation of lane reduction “road diet” measures on crashes and injuries. Transportation Research Record, 1784(1): 80-90. Huang, S., Li, H., Wang, M., Qian, Y., Steenland, K., Caudle, W. M., Liu, Y., Sarnat, J., Papatheodorou, S. & Shi, L. (2021). Long-term exposure to nitrogen dioxide and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Science of The Total Environment, 776: 145968. Hysing, E., Frändberg, L., & Vilhelmson, B. (2015). Compromising sustainable mobility? The case of the Gothenburg congestion tax. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(6): 1058-1075. Jacob, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York, United States: Random House. Jaffe, L. S. (1968). Photochemical air pollutants and their effects on men and animals: II. Adverse effects. Archives of Environmental Health: An International Journal, 16(2): 241-255. Jansen, R. J., & Varotto, S. F. (2022). Caught in the blind spot of a truck: A choice model on driver glance behavior towards cyclists at intersections. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 174: 106759. Jensen, P., Rouquier, J. B., Ovtracht, N., & Robardet, C. (2010). Characterizing the speed and paths of shared bicycle use in Lyon. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 15(8): 522-524. Jia, Y. Y., Wang, Q., & Liu, T. (2017). Toxicity research of PM2.5 compositions in vitro. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(3): 232. Jones, M. (2022). For a ‘new new regional geography’: plastic regions and more-than-relational regionality. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 104(1): 43-58. Jones, P., Marshall, S., & Boujenko, N. (2008). Creating more people-friendly urban streets through ‘link and place’street planning and design. International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences (IATSS) Research, 32(1): 14-25. Jung, S., Xiao, Q., & Yoon, Y. (2013). Evaluation of motorcycle safety strategies using the severity of injuries. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 59: 357-364. Kan, Y., Wang, Y., Papageorgiou, M., & Papamichail, I. (2016). Local ramp metering with distant downstream bottlenecks: A comparative study. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 62: 149-170. Karndacharuk, A., Wilson, D. J. and Dunn, R. (2014). A review of the evolution of shared (street) space concepts in urban environments. Transport Reviews, 34(2): 190-220. Karner, A., Bills, T., & Golub, A. (2023). Emerging perspectives on transportation justice. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,116: 103618. Kim, S., Choi, J., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determining the sidewalk pavement width by using pedestrian discomfort levels and movement characteristics. Korean Society of Civil Engineers (KSCE) Journal of Civil Engineering, 15: 883-889. Krecl, P., Harrison, R. M., Johansson, C., Targino, A. C., Beddows, D. C., Ellermann, T., Lara, C. & Ketzel, M. (2021). Long-term trends in nitrogen oxides concentrations and on-road vehicle emission factors in Copenhagen, London and Stockholm. Environmental Pollution, 290: 118105. Labi, S., Faiz, A., Saeed, T. U., Alabi, B. N. T., & Woldemariam, W. (2019). Connectivity, accessibility, and mobility relationships in the context of low-volume road networks. Transportation Research Record, 2673(12): 717-727. Lang, W., Hui, E. C., Chen, T., & Li, X. (2020). Understanding livable dense urban form for social activities in transit-oriented development through human-scale measurements. Habitat International, 104: 102238. LaPlante, J., & McCann, B. (2008). Complete streets: We can get there from here. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE Journal), 78(5), 24. Lefebvre, H. (1996). The right to the city. (Kofman, E. and Lebas, E., Trans.) Paris, France: Anthropos. (Original work published 1968) Lefebvre-Ropars, G., Morency, C., & Negron-Poblete, P. (2021). Toward a framework for assessing the fair distribution of space in urban streets. Transportation Research Record, 2675: 259-274. Lee, J., Abdel-Aty, M., & Jiang, X. (2015). Multivariate crash modeling for motor vehicle and non-motorized modes at the macroscopic level. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 78: 146-154. Li, R., Chester, M. V., Middel, A., Vanos, J. K., Hernandez-Cortes, D., Buo, I., & Hondula, D. M. (2023). Effectiveness of travel behavior and infrastructure change to mitigate heat exposure. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 5: 1129388. Lin, J. J., Lin, T. Y., Kadali, B. R., & Subbarao, S. S. (2023). Zone-based TOD evaluation considering interdependences among criteria and zones.Transport Policy,133: 108-119. Liu, H. C., & Lin, J. J. (2019). Associations of built environments with spatiotemporal patterns of public bicycle use. Journal of Transport Geography, 74: 299-312. Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now?.Transport Policy, 20: 105-113. M. Sykes, D., & G. Kelly, K. (2014). Motorcycle tourism demand generators and dynamic interaction leisure. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 8(1): 92-102. Manan, M. M. A., & Noordin, N. M. (2023). The Performance of the Exclusive Motorcycle Lane (EMCL) in Reducing Fatal Crashes Among Motorcyclists after 20 Years of Operation. Construction, 3(2): 285-292 Marshall, W. E., & Garrick, N. W. (2010). Effect of street network design on walking and biking. Transportation Research Record, 2198(1): 103-115. McDonald, N. C., & Aalborg, A. E. (2009). Why parents drive children to school: implications for safe routes to school programs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(3): 331-342. Mees, P. (2014). TOD and multi-modal public transport. Planning Practice & Research, 29(5): 461-470. Meyer, L. (2021), Intergenerational Justice, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The Metaphysics Research Lab, Philosophy Department, Stanford University, California, United States. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-intergenerational/ (Download date: 2023/10/31) Mullaney, J., Lucke, T., & Trueman, S. J. (2015). A review of benefits and challenges in growing street trees in paved urban environments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 134: 157-166. Münzel, T., Sørensen, M., & Daiber, A. (2021). Transportation noise pollution and cardiovascular disease. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 18(9): 619-636. Nadrian, H., Taghdisi, M. H., Pouyesh, K., Khazaee-Pool, M., & Babazadeh, T. (2019). “I am sick and tired of this congestion”: Perceptions of Sanandaj inhabitants on the family mental health impacts of urban traffic jam. Journal of Transport & Health, 14: 100587. Nello-Deakin, S. (2019). Is there such a thing as a ‘fair’ distribution of road space? Journal of Urban Design, 24(5): 698-714. Newman, P., Kosonen, L., & Kenworthy, J. (2016). Theory of urban fabrics: Planning the walking, transit/public transport and automobile/motor car cities for reduced car dependency. Town Planning Review, 87(4): 429-458. Niemeier, D. (2015). A Funding Compromise Can Set Transportation on Path Towards Sustainability. National Center for Sustainable Transportation White Papers. University of California, Davis. Nikiforakis, N., Noussair, C. N., & Wilkening, T. (2012). Normative conflict and feuds: The limits of self-enforcement. Journal of Public Economics, 96(9-10): 797-807. Noland, R. B., Gao, D., Gonzales, E. J., & Brown, C. (2015). Costs and benefits of a road diet conversion. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 3(4): 449-458. Nuga, M., Eimermann, M., & Hedberg, C. (2023). Downshifting towards voluntary simplicity: the process of reappraising the local. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 105(1), 1-18. Paul, K. T., Hull, T. R., Lebek, K., & Stec, A. A. (2008). Fire smoke toxicity: The effect of nitrogen oxides. Fire Safety Journal, 43(4): 243-251. Pereira, R. H., Schwanen, T., & Banister, D. (2017). Distributive justice and equity in transportation. Transport Reviews, 37(2): 170-191. Popescu, R. (2022). The culture of parking on the sidewalks. Cities, 131: 103888. Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition. Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1971) Robbins, C. J., & Fotios, S. (2020). Motorcycle safety after-dark: the factors associated with greater risk of road-traffic collisions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 146: 105731. Rodriguez-Valencia, A. (2014). Urban Right-of-Way Allocation Problem: Considering All Demands. Presented at 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Ryan, S., & Frank, L. F. (2009). Pedestrian environments and transit ridership. Journal of Public Transportation, 12(1), 39-57. Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3): 234-281. Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1): 9-26. Saaty, T. L. (2005). Making and validating complex decisions with the AHP/ANP. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 14: 1-36. Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G. (2006). Decision Making With the Analytic Network Process: Economic, Political, Social And Technological Applications With Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks. New York, United States: Springer Science + Business Media, LLC. Sharmilaa, G., & Ilango, T. (2022). Vehicular air pollution based on traffic density-A case study. Materials Today: Proceedings, 52: 532-536. Shields, L. (2012). The prospects for sufficientarianism. Utilitas, 24(1): 101-117. Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the association of American Geographers, 96(3): 491-507. Smith, T., Nelischer, M., & Perkins, N. (1997). Quality of an urban community: a framework for understanding the relationship between quality and physical form. Landscape and Urban Planning, 39(2-3): 229-241. Stansfeld, S. A., & Matheson, M. P. (2003). Noise pollution: non-auditory effects on health. British Medical Bulletin, 68(1): 243-257. Tan, L., & Wei, L. (2020). Evaluating car license auction mechanisms: theory and experimental evidence. China Economic Review, 60: 101387. Tian, G., Liu, X., Zhang, M., Yang, Y., Zhang, H., Lin, Y., Ma, F., Wang, X., Qu, T. & Li, Z. (2019). Selection of take-back pattern of vehicle reverse logistics in China via Grey-DEMATEL and Fuzzy-VIKOR combined method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 220, 1088-1100. Tierney, G. (2022). Ch.14 Impacts on the public realm: understanding the context. In Ata M. Khan and Susan A. Shaheen. Shared Mobility and Automated Vehicles Responding to Socio-technical Changes and Pandemics.(pp.277-312). London, United Kingdom: The Institution of Engineering and Technology. Tormoehlen, L. M., Tekulve, K. J., & Nañagas, K. A. (2014). Hydrocarbon toxicity: A review. Clinical Toxicology, 52(5): 479-489. Trinder, E., Hay, A., Dignan, J., Else, P., & Skorupski, J. (1991). Concepts of equity, fairness, and justice in British transport legislation, 1960–88. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 9(1): 31-50. Tuan, Y. (1977). Space and Place: The Persepective of Experience. Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States: University of Minnesota Press. Valença, G., Moura, F., & de Sá, A. M. (2021). Main challenges and opportunities to dynamic road space allocation: From static to dynamic urban designs. Journal of Urban Mobility, 1: 100008. Valença, G., Moura, F., & de Sá, A. M. (2023). How can we develop road space allocation solutions for smart cities using emerging information technologies? A review using text mining. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3(1): 100150. Wang, X., Zhou, Q., Quddus, M., & Fan, T. (2018). Speed, speed variation and crash relationships for urban arterials. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 113: 236-243. Wey, W. M., & Wu, K. Y. (2007). Using ANP priorities with goal programming in resource allocation in transportation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7-8): 985-1000. Wjst, M., Reitmeir, P., Dold, S., Wulff, A., Nicolai, T., von Loeffelholz-Colberg, E. F., & Von Mutius, E. (1993). Road traffic and adverse effects on respiratory health in children. British Medical Journal, 307(6904): 596-600. Woodcock, B. A. (2014). “The scientific method” as myth and ideal. Science & Education, 23: 2069-2093. Xu, M., Xin, J., Su, S., Weng, M., & Cai, Z. (2017). Social inequalities of park accessibility in Shenzhen, China: The role of park quality, transport modes, and hierarchical socioeconomic characteristics. Journal of Transport Geography, 62: 38-50. Yang, R., Wang, Z., Lin, P. S., Li, X., Chen, Y., Hsu, P. P., & Henry, A. (2019). Safety effects of street lighting on roadway segments: Development of a crash modification function. Traffic Injury Prevention, 20(3): 296-302. Yi, C., Lee, D. H., & Lee, J. A. (2015). Reorganization on the subway entrance system in Seoul for better pedestrian environment. Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment (KIEAE) Journal, 15(4): 53-60. Zhao, J., & Liu, Y. (2016). Integrated signal optimization and non-traditional lane assignment for urban freeway off-ramp congestion mitigation. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 73: 219-238. Zhang, J., Li, Z., Zhang, F., Qi, Y., Zhou, W., Wang, Y., Zhao, D. & Wang, W. (2018). Evaluating the impacts of bus stop design and bus dwelling on operations of multitype road users. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2018: 4702517. Zhang, C., Du, B., Zheng, Z., & Shen, J. (2023a). Space sharing between pedestrians and micro-mobility vehicles: A systematic review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 116: 103629. Zhang, Z., Ma, G., Lin, X., & Dai, H. (2023b). Accessibility in a multiple transport mode urban park based on the “DD” model: A case study in park city, Chengdu. Cities, 134: 104191. Zheng, M. C. (2018). Evidence Based Design of Scooter Parking Space in Taiwan. In Advances in Human Factors, Sustainable Urban Planning and Infrastructure: Proceedings of the AHFE 2017 International Conference on Human Factors, Sustainable Urban Planning and Infrastructure, July 17− 21, 2017, The Westin Bonaventure Hotel, Los Angeles, California, USA. Springer International Publishing. 187-198. Zhong, S., & Sun, D. (2022). Logic-Driven Traffic Big Data Analytics: An Introduction. In Logic-Driven Traffic Big Data Analytics: Methodology and Applications for Planning, 1-32. Singapore: Springer Nature. Zhou, J., Guo, Y., Sun, J., Yu, E., & Wang, R. (2022). Review of bike-sharing system studies using bibliometrics method. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English edition), 9(4): 608-630. Zhu, H. B. (2010). Numerical study of urban traffic flow with dedicated bus lane and intermittent bus lane. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 389(16): 3134-3139. Zoika, S., Tzouras, P. G., Tsigdinos, S., & Kepaptsoglou, K. (2021). Causal analysis of illegal parking in urban roads: The case of Greece. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(3): 1084-1096. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93462 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在對台北都會區五種運輸方式（行人、自行車、公車、機車、汽車）的道路路權與空間分佈，提出一套重新分配道路空間以促進正義發展的方法。此項議題的重要性在既有城市的主要道路路權分配中，較缺少對除汽車之外對運輸方式路權分配的關注，因此有必要以修正正義的概念，設計一系列對不同運輸方式的空間重分配方法。
這套空間重分配的方法基礎為約翰‧羅爾斯(John Rawls)的“正義論(A Theory of Justice)”，作為最佳化目標函數的理論基礎。以既有空間分配、既有路段車流量、基礎設施、綠地面積、環境條件等諸多因素，引用相關文獻並用作設計模型的正義標準。資料來源提取自專家問卷所提供的數值，與現有各來源的統計資料兩種，將其利用分析網絡程序（Analytical Network Process, ANP）以評估不同運輸方式的正義相對重要性，以此作為目標式中運輸方式正義的空間比例基準。隨後利用最佳化模型，按既有的旅運習慣與道路設計作為限制式，最終可得出實際可行的道路斷面配置建議，並進行相關討論。 這項研究的主要貢獻在於試圖將定性的正義理論，與定量的數學規劃模型結合，從而提供一套包含多元正義觀點的道路空間重分配模型。在空間有限的城市建成區主要道路範圍內，使各運輸方式的使用者都能趨向於正義的道路空間分配結果，最終實現交通平權的社會觀念。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study investigates five transportation modes (pedestrians, bicycles, buses, motorcycles, cars) in the Taipei Metropolitan Area, where the allocation of right-of-way on major roads lacks attention to the transportation modes other than cars, especially to the two wheelers. Therefore, it is necessary to design a series of spatial redistribution model for different transportation modes based on the concept of revised justice.
It proposes a method for equitably reallocating road space to promote just development. The theoretical foundation of this research rests upon John Rawls' "A Theory of Justice," serving as the basis for the optimization objective function. Various criteria, including existing space allocation, traffic volume on road segments, infrastructure, green space availability, and other factors, are employed as constraints and criteria for the design model. Data from expert surveys and existing sources are utilized to inform these criteria, while the Analytical Network Process (ANP) is employed to assess the relative importance of different modes. Each mode is integrated into an Injustice Index developed within this research framework. The optimal model is subsequently utilized to propose recommendations for allocating road cross-section configurations, offering practical suggestions for implementation. The primary contribution of this study lies in its attempt to amalgamate qualitative theoretical principles with quantitative mathematical programming models, thereby furnishing a suite of road right-of-way reallocation models that embrace diverse perspectives of equality. Within the confines of limited urban road space, users of each transportation mode can strive to achieve a fairer distribution of road space, ultimately attaining their notions of "justice" regarding right-of-way. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-01T16:15:10Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-01T16:15:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 目次 iv 表次 vii 圖次 ix 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究對象 5 第三節 道路篩選方式 10 第四節 研究限制 16 第五節 研究流程 18 第二章 文獻回顧 21 第一節 道路空間分配的討論依據 22 第二節 道路空間分配的正義準則面向 25 第三節 綜合評析 31 第三章 研究方法－分析網絡程序模型（ANP模型） 34 第一節 分析架構建立流程 36 第二節 主目標設計 42 第三節 子目標設計 51 第四節 準則設計 68 第五節 數值資料蒐集方法彙整 120 第六節 正義標準公式建立 133 第四章 研究方法－最佳化模型 141 第一節 目標式：不正義指數 144 第二節 限制式：道路路幅限制 150 第三節 限制式：既有旅運習慣考量 156 第四節 模型綜覽 167 第五章 各路段的模型應用研究結果 170 第一節 公車專用道在羅斯福路三、四段(ID=01~02) 171 第二節 道路綠帶在仁愛路一段(ID=03~04) 176 第三節 建物空間在和平東路與新生南路口(ID=05~08) 180 第四節 號誌控制與車道瘦身在基隆光復路口(ID=09~11) 187 第五節 高架道路在基隆路二、三段(ID=12~13) 193 第六節 車向轉向限制與對稱性在信義基隆路口(ID=14~16) 197 第七節 限制式彈性與零方案在公館圓環(ID=17~19) 203 第八節 歷史意義與現代功能衝突在忠孝中山路口(ID=20~23) 209 第九節 機車導向的民權承德路口(ID=33~36) 218 第十節 研究結果代結 225 第六章 討論 226 第一節 一般性概念化意涵 226 第二節 路權分配因子對於專用道的影響性與填答者的正義觀差異 231 第三節 挑選方案的正義取徑 234 第四節 現階段一維空間分配順序與二維空間分配的未來精進發展方向 241 第五節 各類運輸方式的重分配與不正義指數總覽 248 第六節 對於模型結果的後設檢驗方向 255 第七章 結論 257 參考文獻 259 附錄 278 附錄A－專家問卷內容設計與填答結果 278 附錄B－專家問卷一致性檢定結果 310 附錄C－各道路樣區實地測量資料 312 附錄D－Lingo程式碼設計 323 附錄E－第五章未討論的其他道路空間重分配結果 325 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 路權分配問題 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 交通正義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 運輸方式平權 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 多準則評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 分析網絡過程 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 羅爾斯差異原則 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 多元主義正義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Transportation Modes Equity | en |
| dc.subject | Right of Way Allocation Problem | en |
| dc.subject | Pluralism Justice | en |
| dc.subject | Rawlsian Difference Principle | en |
| dc.subject | Analytical Network Process | en |
| dc.subject | Multiple Criteria Evaluation | en |
| dc.subject | Transport Justice | en |
| dc.title | 不同運輸方式間正義的都市道路空間重分配－以台北市為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Justice in Urban Road Space Reallocation Between Transportation Modes - A Case Study of Taipei City | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鄭祖睿;朱致遠 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Tsu-Jui Cheng;Chih-Yuan Chu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 路權分配問題,交通正義,運輸方式平權,多準則評估,分析網絡過程,羅爾斯差異原則,多元主義正義, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Right of Way Allocation Problem,Transport Justice,Transportation Modes Equity,Multiple Criteria Evaluation,Analytical Network Process,Rawlsian Difference Principle,Pluralism Justice, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 336 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202402344 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-07-30 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 地理環境資源學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 地理環境資源學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf | 26.12 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。