Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 土木工程學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93425
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor林偲妘zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorSzu-Yun Linen
dc.contributor.author裴德勝zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorDuc-Thang Buien
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-31T16:15:53Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-01-
dc.date.copyright2024-07-31-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.date.submitted2024-07-24-
dc.identifier.citationAkinci, B. and Fischer, M. (1998). “Factors Affecting Contractors’ Risk of Cost Overburden”. Journal of Management in Engineering, 14, 67-77, 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1998)14:1(67).
Alann M. Ramirez. (2005). “Construction Management Design Build”, Hill International, pp. 34- 35.
Albert P. C. Chan et al. (2001). “Design and build project success factors: Multivariate analysis,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 93-100.
An Hoa, Bao Long. (2022). “$4 bln LNG-to-power project stagnates amid procedure hiccups”. https://theinvestor.vn/4-bln-lng-to-power-project-stagnates-amid-procedure-hiccups-d896.html.
Anh P, (2023). Title in Vietnamese “GDP năm 2023 tăng 5.05%” (GDP in 2023 increases by 5.05%). https://vnexpress.net/gdp-nam-2023-tang-5-05-4694770.html.
Ashuri and Durmus-Pedini. (2010). “An Overview of the Benefits and Risk Factors of Going Green in Existing Buildings”. Journal of International Journal of Facility Management.
Bernard, H. R. (2002). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed.)
Colin Gray, Will Hughes. (2001). “Chapter 4 - Stage, roles and responsibilities,” in Building Design Management, Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 45.
Creedy, Garry D. (2006). “Risk factors leading to cost overrun in the delivery of highway construction projects”. PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology.
Dai Q. Tran et al. (2014.). “Impact of risk on design-build selection for highway design and construction projects,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 153-162.
Decision 500/QD-TTg dated May 15, 2023 of the Prime Minister approving the National Electricity Development Plan for the period 2021 - 2030, vision to 2050 (PDP8 project).
Dr. Tarez Hegazy. (2002). “Computer based construction project management”.
Edmond W. M. Lam et al. (2008). “Determinants of successful design-build projects,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 134, no. 5, pp. 333-341.
Edwin H. W. Chan et al. (2005). “Design management in design and build projects: The new role of the contractor,” in Proc. Construction Research Congress.
El-Sayegh, S.M. and Mansour, M.H. (2015). “Risk Assessment and Allocation in Highway Construction Projects in the UAE”. Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 31, 04015004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000365.
Eybpoosh, M., Dikmen, I., and Talat Birgonul, M. (2011). “Identification of risk paths in international construction projects using structural equation modeling.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000382, 1164–1175
Gorsuch, R. L. (1974). Factor Analysis.
Guide, A. (2004). “A guide to the project management body of knowledge: (PMBOK guide).” Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA
Hampton, K. R. (2001). “Collaborative multidisciplinary design optimization.” Leadersh. Manage. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748 (2001)1:3(23), 23–28.
Hair Jr., J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. (2009). “Multivariate Data Analysis”. 7th Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 761.
Hans Bakker et al. (2022). “Incorporating project complexities in risk assessment: case of an airport expansion construction project”. Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 38, no. 6, 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001099.
Harold Kerzner. (2017). “Project risk management,” in A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge: PMBOK® Guide – Sixth edition, Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute, pp. 395.
James E. Koch et al. (2010).” Introduction to Design-Build Project Administration,” in Project Administration for Design – Build Contracts, Reston, Virginia: ASCE, pp. 14-15.
Joanna Goral. (2017). “Risk Management in the Conceptual Design Phase of Building Projects”. Master’s Thesis in the International Master’s Programme Structural Engineering.
Junying Liu, Qunxia Xie, Bo Xia, Adrian J. Bridge. (2017). “Impact of design risk on the performance of Design-Build projects”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol.143, no. 6, 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001299.
Karim El-Dash, Emad Abd-Raboh, Zakariya El-Dars. (2006). “Risk management in the design phase of large-scale construction projects,” presented at 20th IPMA World Congress on Project Management, Shanghai, China, Vol. 1.
Kathryn Neville. (2022). “The Reality of Vietnam’s Energy Transition”. https://thediplomat.com/2022/11/the-reality-of-vietnams-energy-transition.
Ken Fredrickson. (2001). “Design guidelines for design-build projects,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 77-80.
Krantikumar Mhetre, B.A. Konnur, Amarsinh B. Landage. (2016). “Risk Management in Construction Industry”. International Journal of Engineering Research, Volume No.5, Issue Special 1 pp: 153-155, ISSN:2319-6890(online),2347-5013 (print).
Ling F.Y.Y., Ofori G., and Low S.P. (2000). “Impoertance of design consultants’s soft skills in design-build projects”. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 7(4), 389-398.
Liu, B., et al. (2016). “Key factors of project characteristics affecting project delivery system decision making in the Chinese construction industry: Case study using Chinese data based on rough set theory.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Education and Practice, 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000278, 05016003.
Long Le-Hoai, Young Dai Lee, and Jun Yong Lee. (2008). “Delay and cost overruns in Vietnam large construction projects: A comparison with other selected countries”. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering (2008) 12(6):367-377, 10.1007/s12205-008-0367-7.
Naoum S. G. (1994). “Dissertation Research and Writing for Construction Students”, Second edition.
Ng, S. T., and Skitmore, Martin. (2002). “Contractors’ risks in design, novate and construct contracts,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 20, no. 2, pp.119-126.
Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory. 2nd Edition.
Olabode E. Ogunsanmi. (2004). “Risk Classification Model for Design and Build Projects”. Covenant Journal of Research in theBuilt Environment (CJRBE) Vol.3, No.1. June,2015.
Roger Flanagan, George Norman. (1994). “Chapter 3 – The risk management system,” in Risk management and construction, Great Britain: Wiley, pp. 27-46.
Rowlinson S.M., Walker A. (1995). “The construction industry in Hongkong”. Hong Kong: Longman.
S. Iqbal et al. (2014). “Risk management in construction projects”. Technological and economic development of economy, ISSN 2029-4913 / eiSSn 2029-4921, 2015 Volume 21(1): 65–78
Sai PK Bypanemi, DQ Tran. (2018). “Empirical indentification and evaluation of risk in highway project delivery methods”. Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 34, no. 3, 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000602.
SeungYeon Lee; YeEun Jang; June-Seong Yi; and JeongWook Son. (2023). “Identifying critical risk factors and management activities for effective offsite construction projects during construction phase”. Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 39, no. 4, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5310.
Sidney M. Levy. (2006). “Chapter 1. An introduction to Design-Build,” in DesignBuild Project Delivery, United States of America: The McGraw-Hill Companies, pp.11-14.
Slotegraaf, R. J., and Atuahene-Gima, K. (2011). “Product development team stability and new product advantage: The role of decision-making processes.” J. Marketing, 75(1), 96–108
Songer A.D., Molenaar K.R. (1996). “Project characteristics of successful public sector design-build”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 123(1), 34-40.
Wang, T., et al. (2015). “Enhancing design management by partnering in delivery of international EPC projects: Evidence from Chinese construction companies.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(4), 04015099.
William, A.S and Johnson, J.K. (2013). “Mclaughlin and Kaluzny’s Continuous Quality Improvement in Healthcare”. 4th Edition, Jones & Bartlett Learning, London.
Xianbo Zhao, Lin Yang. (2020). “Risk response of complex projects: risk association network method”. Journal of Management in Engineering, vol.37, no. 4, 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000916.
Y.Y. Ling, B.S.Y. Lau. (2001). “A case study on the management of the development of a large-scale power plant project in East Asia based on design-build arrangement”. International Journal of Project Management 20 (2002) 413–423.
Zavadskas et al. (2009). “Risk assessment of construction projects,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 33-46.
Zhi, H. (1995). “Risk management for overseas construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage., 13(4), 231–237.
Zou, P. X. W., Zhang, G., and Wang, J. (2007). “Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China.” Int. J. Project Manage.,25(6), 601–614.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93425-
dc.description.abstract設計階段的風險為影響工程項目成功與否的關鍵要素。針對越南之電廠統包興建工程,本研究揭示並識別設計階段之關鍵風險因素,根據影響程度和可能性對其進行排名,進而提出相對應之風險管理對策。首先,透過回顧過去文獻以及深入訪談資深專家,共計識別並檢視了37項設計風險。接著採用李克特五點量表進行問卷調查,包括各設計風險之影響程度及發生可能性。針對106份有效問卷進行數據分析。本研究以探索性因素分析歸納出六種類型:設計團隊缺乏能力和經驗的風險;設計方案不當的風險;設計團隊缺乏責任感的風險;低效率的文件覆核以及各方利益相關者不良合作的風險;投資者的要求變更的風險;以及遭到投資者的反對和誤解的風險。最後,透過回顧相關研究、專家訪談以及越南發電廠的案例研究,討論歸納出對應之風險管理手段,以降低設計風險並取得更好的工程成果。具體建議包括:採用國際設計標準;於設計階段使用建築資訊模型;制定明確的設計流程和有效的人才管理策略等。本研究之發現有助於越南電廠興建專案於設計階段之風險分析,也為利害關係人提供了設計過程中的風險清單和管理手段。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractDesign risks can have a significant impact on construction project success. Focusing on the Design-Build power plant projects in Vietnam, this study lists the design risk factors and ranks them according to the level of impact and possibility, and then suggests appropriate risk management countermeasures. A comprehensive analysis of related research and in-depth interviews with construction specialists in Vietnam resulted in the identification and evaluation of 37 design risk factors. A survey consisting of a five-point Likert scale was distributed to 150 people working in the construction industry regarding the level of impact and possibility for design risks. This produced 106 valid answers for the analysis of the data. According to exploratory factor analysis, six groups could be formed from these factors: risk of design team lack of capacity and experience, risk of improper design scheme, risk of design team lack of responsibility, risk of inefficient document review and poor cooperation between stakeholders, risk of change and requested by owner, and risk of disagreement and misunderstanding by owner. Last, through reviewing related studies, interviewing experts, and a case study of a power plant project in Vietnam, specific design risk management activities have been suggested to mitigate design risks and achieve better project results, including using international design standards, using Building Information Modeling (BIM) in designing phase, having a clear design process, and having an effective human resource management strategy. The findings contribute to the knowledge of Design-Build participants about design risk analysis and risk management activities of power plant projects in Vietnam. More fundamentally, the findings enhance Design-Build participants' understanding and awareness of the level of impact and possibility of risk factors during the design phase. This research also provides stakeholders with a checklist and analysis of risks during the design process, enriching research on risk analysis and management.en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-07-31T16:15:53Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-07-31T16:15:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontentsTable of Contents
Chapter 1. Introduction 1
1.1. Research background 1
1.3. Research scope 3
1.4. Research contributions 3
1.5. Organization of the Thesis 4
Chapter 2. Literature review 5
2.1. Definitions 5
2.1.1. Design-Build delivery system 5
2.1.2. Design phase 7
2.1.3. Risk 9
2.1.4. Risk in design phase 10
2.1.5. Power plant projects 11
2.2. Related studies 14
2.2.1. Related studied to identify design risks 14
2.2.2. Related studies of risk’s management methods 16
2.3. Chapter summary 17
Chapter 3. Methodology 22
3.1. Research strategy 22
3.2. Research design 22
3.3. Data collection 28
3.3.1. Questionnaire design 28
3.3.2. Sample size and data collection method 29
3.4. Statistical analysis 30
3.4.1. Reliability and validity analysis (Cronbach’s alpha α coefficient) 30
3.4.2. Ranking factors 31
3.4.3. ANOVA analysis 32
3.4.4. Exploratory factor analysis EFA 33
3.5. Chapter summary 35
Chapter 4. Questionnaire results and discussion 36
4.1. Introduction 36
4.2. Profile analysis of respondents 37
4.2.1. Years of experience in construction industry 37
4.2.2. Current expertise of respondents 38
4.2.3. Current organization of respondents 40
4.2.4. Capacity of power plant project 41
4.3. Reliability test 42
4.4. Risk ranking 42
4.4.1. Risk ranking according to level of impact 42
4.4.2. Risk ranking according to level of possibility 46
4.4.3. Risk ranking 50
4.5. ANOVA test 56
4.5.1. Testing differences between groups in experience 56
4.5.2. Testing differences between groups in expertise 58
4.5.3. Testing differences between groups in surveyed participation organization 63
4.6. Exploratory factor analysis EFA 67
4.6.1. DR1: Risk of design team lack of capacity and experience 72
4.6.2. DR2: Risk of improper design scheme 74
4.6.3. DR3: Risk of design team lack of responsibility 75
4.6.4. DR4: Risk of inefficient document review and poor cooperation between stakeholders 76
4.6.5. DR5: Risk of change and requested by owner 77
4.6.6. DR6: Risk of disagreement and misunderstand by owner 78
4.7. Chapter summary 78
Chapter 5. Management activities of design risks 80
5.1. Management activities 80
5.1.1. Literature review of risk management 80
5.1.2. Description of expert interview for management activities 81
5.1.3. Management activities of power plant projects in design phase 82
5.2. Case study of a power plant in Vietnam 90
5.2.1. Introduction of case study 90
5.2.2. Risk in design phase of case study 92
5.2.3. Discussion of management activities between literature review and case study 104
5.3. Chapter summary 106
Chapter 6. Conclusion 107
6.1. Conclusions 107
6.2. Recommendations to stakeholders 109
6.3. Limitations and future research 110
References 111
Appendices 118
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject風險管理zh_TW
dc.subject探索性因素分析zh_TW
dc.subject設計風險zh_TW
dc.subject設計建造zh_TW
dc.subject發電廠項目zh_TW
dc.subjectdesign-builden
dc.subjectrisk managementen
dc.subjectexploratory factor analysisen
dc.subjectpower plant projectsen
dc.subjectdesign risken
dc.title電廠專案於設計階段之關鍵風險因素與管理zh_TW
dc.titleRisk management in design phase of Design-Build power plant projectsen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear112-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee謝尚賢;詹瀅潔zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeShang-Hsien Hsieh;Ying-Chieh Chanen
dc.subject.keyword風險管理,探索性因素分析,設計風險,設計建造,發電廠項目,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordrisk management,exploratory factor analysis,design risk,design-build,power plant projects,en
dc.relation.page149-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202402214-
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)-
dc.date.accepted2024-07-26-
dc.contributor.author-college工學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept土木工程學系-
顯示於系所單位:土木工程學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-112-2.pdf1.83 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved