Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 商學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93375
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor郭瑞祥zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorRuey-Shan Guoen
dc.contributor.author蔡欣蓓zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHsin-Pei Tsaien
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-30T16:12:15Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-31-
dc.date.copyright2024-07-30-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.date.submitted2024-07-23-
dc.identifier.citation中文文獻
Deloitte。數位供應網絡的崛起:工業4.0帶動供應鏈的數位轉型。
中華民國風險管理學會(2020)。2020年度台灣企業風險管理調查。
中華電信股份有限公司(2022)。中華電信永續報告書。
仁寶電腦工業股份有限公司(2022)。仁寶電腦永續報告書。
台灣中油股份有限公司(2023)。台灣中油永續報告書。
台灣積體電路製造股份有限公司(2022)。台積公司永續報告書。
台灣積體電路製造股份有限公司(民111)。台灣積體電路製造股份有限公司年報。
史書華(2023,10月17日)。「全世界哪裡還有電子五哥齊聚?」越南不甘洗產地,拜登送來半導體。天下雜誌,784期。
安侯企業管理股份有限公司(KPMG)(2020)。COVID-19 :亞太區企業韌性指南。
安侯企業管理股份有限公司(KPMG)(2023)。2023十大風險報告—挑戰企業底線 重塑全球化。
行政院主計總處 (2024,2月29日)。國民所得統計及國內經濟情勢展望。
李震宇 (民110,10 月 28 日)。近 6 年主要國家出口依存度多呈下滑,亞洲地區尤為明顯。財政統計通報(第 19 號)。
和碩聯合科技股份有限公司(2022)。和碩永續報告書。
高長(2023)。中共20大後兩岸經貿關係的可能變化。展望與探索月刊,21(5),65-71。
國家發展委員會 (2016)。臺灣經濟發展歷程與策略。
郭定謀(民99)。輸入型供應鏈風險分析。國立東華大學全球運籌管理研究所碩士論文,花蓮縣。
陳玉鳳 (2021) 。全球產業供應鏈重組中 貿易戰及疫情影響「長鏈」變「短鏈」。貿易雜誌,No.356。
陳悅萱(2021)。「全球化」抑或「去全球化」?-以國際貿易為例。法印學報,(12),179-193。
陳膺仁(民95)。供應鏈風險衡量模式之建立。東吳大學商學院企業管理學系碩士班碩士論文,臺北市。
富邦金融控股股份有限公司(2022)。富邦金控永續報告書。
經濟部統計處(民111) 。外銷訂單海外生產實況調查結果。
資誠聯合會計師事務所(pwc)(2022)。2022臺灣企業領袖調查—成功企業新定義。
資誠聯合會計師事務所(pwc)(2023)。2023臺灣企業領袖調查—成功企業新定義。
廣達電腦股份有限公司(2022)。廣達電腦永續報告書。
緯創資通股份有限公司(2022)。緯創資通股份有限公司永續報告書。
薛飛 (Yossi Sheffi)(2010)。從危機中勝出:MIT的供應鏈風險管理學。吳家恆(譯)。臺北市:遠流。
鴻海精密工業股份有限公司(2022)。鴻海科技集團永續報告書。
蘇筑瑄 (2022) 。臺商在中國大陸經營狀況與趨勢變化。經濟前瞻,201期,Pp. 113-118。

英文文獻
Antràs, P. (2020). De-globalisation? Global value chains in the post-COVID-19 age (No. w28115). National Bureau of Economic Research.
ASCM, KPMG (2023). Quarterly Index Report SUPPLY CHAIN STABILITY INDEX.
Aven, T., & Renn, O. (2009). On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain. Journal of Risk Research, 12(1), 1–11.
Barratt, M. (2004). Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management: an international journal, 9(1), 30-42.
Cao, M., & Zhang, Q. (2011). Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(3), 163-180.
Chowdhury P., Paul S.K., Kaisar S., Moktadir M.A (2021). COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 148, Article 102271.
Christopher, M. (2000). The agile supply chain: competing in volatile markets. Industrial marketing management, 29(1), 37-44.
Christopher, M., & Towill, D. (2001). An integrated model for the design of agile supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 31(4), 235-246.
COSO (2017). Enterprise Risk Management—Integrating with Strategy and Performance.
Davis, T. (1993). Effective supply chain management. Sloan management review, 34, 35-35.
Deloitte (no date). The value killers revisited A risk management study. https://www2.deloitte.com/ba/en/pages/risk/articles/the-value-killers-revisited.html
Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Rozhkov, M. (2019). Does the ripple effect influence the bullwhip effect? An integrated analysis of structural and operational dynamics in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 58(5), 1285–1301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1627438
Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2018). Ripple effect in the supply chain: an analysis and recent literature. International journal of production research, 56(1-2), 414-430.
Economist Impact (2024). Trade In Transition: navigating the tides of uncertainty Global Report.
EY-Parthenon (2022). 2023 Geostrategic Outlook-How to build a robust strategy for a volatile world.
Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. M.I.T Press.
FortiGuard Labs (2023). Cyber Threat Predictions for 2023: An Annual Perspective by FortiGuard Labs.
Gunasekaran, A., Subramanian, N., & Rahman, S. (2015). Supply chain resilience: role of complexities and strategies. International Journal of Production Research, 53(22), 6809–6819. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1093667
Gygli, Savina, Florian Haelg, Niklas Potrafke and Jan-Egbert Sturm (2019). The KOF Globalisation Index – Revisited. Review of International Organizations, 14(3), 543-574 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2
Helena Carvalho, Ana P. Barroso, Virgínia H. Machado, Susana Azevedo, V. Cruz-Machado (2012). Supply chain redesign for resilience using simulation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages 329-341, ISSN 0360-8352, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2011.10.003
Hill, Charles W.L., Jones, Gareth R. (1998). Strategic Management Theory: an Integrated Approach (4th Edition). Houghton Mifflin.
Ivanov, D., Sokolov, B., & Dolgui, A. (2014). The Ripple effect in supply chains: trade-off ‘efficiency-flexibility-resilience’ in disruption management. International Journal of Production Research, 52(7), 2154-2172.
Javorcik, B. (2020). Global supply chains will not be the same in the post-COVID-19 world. COVID-19 and trade policy: Why turning inward won’t work, 111, 111-116.
Jens Rasmussen (1997). Risk management in a dynamic society: a modeling problem. Safety Science, Volume 27, Issues 2–3, Pages 183-213.
John Haynes (1895). Risk as an Economic Factor. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 409–449
Jüttner, U., Peck, H., & Christopher, M. (2003). Supply chain risk management: outlining an agenda for future research. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 6(4), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675560310001627016
Kahneman, Daniel & Tversky, Amos (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Kamalahmadi, M., Shekarian, M., & Mellat Parast, M (2022). The impact of flexibility and redundancy on improving supply chain resilience to disruptions. International Journal of Production Research, 60(6), 1992–2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1883759
Kaplan, S. and Garrick, B.J. (1981). On The Quantitative Definition of Risk. Risk Analysis, 1: 11-27.
Knight, Frank H., Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (1921). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1496192
Kumar, N. (1996). The power of trust in manufacturer-retailer relationships. Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 92.
Lam, J. (2014). Enterprise risk management: from incentives to controls. John Wiley & Sons.
Lee, H. L. (2004). The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 102-113.
Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (1997). The bullwhip effect in supply chains.
Lena Silbermayr, Stefan Minner (2016). Dual sourcing under disruption risk and cost improvement through learning. European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 250, Issue 1, Pages 226-238, ISSN 0377-2217.
Mason-Jones, R., Naylor, B., & Towill, D. R. (2000). Lean, agile or leagile? Matching your supply chain to the marketplace. International Journal of Production Research, 38(17), 4061-4070.
Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 1-25.
Michael Rothschild, Joseph E. Stiglitz (1978). 6 - Increasing Risk: I. A Definition, Uncertainty in Economics. Academic Press, Pages 99-121
Minhao Gu, Lu Yang, Baofeng Huo (2021). The impact of information technology usage on supply chain resilience and performance: An ambidextrous view. International Journal of Production Economics, Volume 232, 107956, ISSN 0925-5273, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107956.
Naylor, J. B., Naim, M. M., & Berry, D. (1999). Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1-2), 107-118.
One-Ki (Daniel) Lee, Vallabh Sambamurthy, Kai H. Lim, and Kwok Kee Wei (2015). How Does IT Ambidexterity Impact Organizational Agility? Information Systems Research 2015 26:2, 398-417
Panwar, R., Pinkse, J., & De Marchi, V. (2022). The future of global supply chains in a post-COVID-19 world. California Management Review, 64(2), 5-23.
Pegoraro, D., De Propris, L., & Chidlow, A. (2020). De-globalisation, value chains and reshoring. Industry, 4, 152-175.
Porter, Michael E. (1980) Extracts from Competitive Strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors: with a new introduction, pp.1-48. New York, NY: The Free Press USA.
Roberta Pereira, C., Christopher, M. and Lago Da Silva, A. (2014). Achieving supply chain resilience: the role of procurement. Supply Chain Management, Vol. 19 No. 5/6, pp. 626-642. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2013-0346
Roccu, R., & Talani, L. S. (2019). Introduction: the globalisation debate—from de-globalisation to the dark side of globalisation. The dark side of globalisation, 1-17.
Scholten, K. and Schilder, S. (2015). The role of collaboration in supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 471-484. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-11-2014-0386
Sheffi, Y., & Rice, Jr, J. B. 2005. A Supply Chain View of the Resilient Enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1): 41-48.
SIA, BCG (April 2021). STRENGTHENING THE GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR SUPPLY CHAIN IN AN UNCERTAIN ERA.
Simatupang, T. M. & Sridharan, R. (2002). The collaborative supply chain. The international journal of logistics management, 13(1), 15-30.
Stevenson, W. J., Hojati, M., Cao, J., Mottaghi, H., & Bakhtiari, B. (2007). Operations management. McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Thomson Reuters Institute (2022). Global Trade Report 2022-Turbulence tempered with technology.
Um, J. and Han, N. (2021). Understanding the relationships between global supply chain risk and supply chain resilience: the role of mitigating strategies. Supply Chain Management, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 240-255. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-06-2020-0248
Witt, M. A. (2019). De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(7), 1053-1077.
Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1997). Lean thinking—banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48(11), 1148-1148.
World Economic Forum (2023). The Global Risks Report 2023 (18th Edition): INSIGHT REPORT.
World Economic Forum (2024). The Global Risks Report 2024 (19th Edition): INSIGHT REPORT.

網站資料
英文網站
International Monetary Fund. GDP, current prices Billions of U.S. dollars, retrieved from: https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDPD@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD
ISO 31000 Risk management. ISO, retrieved from: https://www.iso.org/iso-31000-risk-management.html
Kearney. Made in America: Here to stay? 2024 Reshoring Index, retrieved from: https://www.kearney.com/service/operations-performance/us-reshoring-index
Rubymar, a UK-owned cargo ship hit by Yemen’s Houthis, sinks in the Red Sea. (March 2, 2024)AL JAZEERA, retrieved from: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/3/2/rubymar-cargo-ship-earlier-hit-by-houthis-has-sunk-yemeni-government-says
Shekhar Aiyar, Anna Ilyina (2023). Charting Globalization’s Turn to Slowbalization After Global Financial Crisis, IMF Blog, retrieved from: https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2023/02/08/charting-globalizations-turn-to-slowbalization-after-global-financial-crisis
The Quiet Beginning of the 3D DRAM Market Share Battle (February 2,2024). TrendForce, retrieved from: https://www.trendforce.com/news/2024/02/02/news-the-quiet-beginning-of-the-3d-dram-market-share-battle/
Therrien, M. C., J. M. Normandin (2012). Risk Management, in L. Côté and J.-F. Savard (eds.). Encyclopedic Dictionary of Public Administration, retrieved from: www.dictionnaire.enap.ca.
United Nations Global Compact. retrieved from: https://unglobalcompact.org/sdgs
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development Goals, retrieved from: https://sdgs.un.org/goals
International Monetary Fund (2000.4.12). Globalization: Threat or Opportunity?, II-What is Globalization?, retrieved from: https://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/ib/2000/041200to.htm
United States Census Bureau. Top Trading Partners - January 2017, retrieved from: https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/highlights/toppartners.html
The White House (April 5, 2018). Statement from President Donald J. Trump on Additional Proposed Section 301 Remedies, retrieved from: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/statement-president-donald-j-trump-additional-proposed-section-301-remedies/
Andreas Wieland(September 28, 2018). The Supply Chain of a Computer. Supply Chain Management Research, retrieved from: https://scmresearch.org/2018/09/28/the-supply-chain-of-a-computer/
Yen Nee Lee(March 15, 2021). 2 charts show how much the world depends on Taiwan for semiconductors. CNBC, retrieved from: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/16/2-charts-show-how-much-the-world-depends-on-taiwan-for-semiconductors.html
Dashveenjit Kaur(December 19, 2022). Globalization and free trade is “almost dead”, says TSMC CEO. TECHWIRE ASIA, retrieved from: https://techwireasia.com/12/2022/globalization-and-free-trade-is-almost-dead-says-tsmc-ceo/
John Keilman (April 8, 2023). America Is Back in the Factory Business. The Wall Street Journal, retrieve from: https://www.wsj.com/articles/american-manufacturing-factory-jobs-comeback-3ce0c52c
United States Census Bureau. Top Trading Partners - July 2023, retrieved from: https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/highlights/top/top2307yr.html#total
M. Ayhan Kosealen Mulabdic (February 22, 2024). Global trade has nearly flatlined. Populism is taking a toll on growth. World Bank Blogs, retrieved from: https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/voices/global-trade-has-nearly-flatlined-populism-taking-toll-growth
OECD (April, 2024). Foreign direct investment in figures, retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/investment/investmentnews.htm
Luca Ventura (May 3, 2024). Richest Countries in the World 2024. Global Finance, retrieved from: https://gfmag.com/data/richest-countries-in-the-world/
Gartner Says Worldwide PC Shipments Increased 0.3% in Fourth Quarter of 2023 but Declined 14.8% for the Year. (January 10, 2024). Gartner, retrieved from: https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/01-10-2024-gartner-says-worldwide-pc-shipments-increased-zero-point-three-percent-in-fourth-quarter-of-2023-but-declined-fourteen-point-eight-percent-for-the-year

中文網站
【商業數據圖解】台灣近十年「家庭消費結構變化」六都數據解析。(2023,9月13日)。未來流通研究所,檢自:https://www.mirai.com.tw/analysis-of-household-consumption-structure-in-taiwan/
Allianz (2024,1月15日)。科技地圖:競爭、分裂和去全球化?檢自:https://tw.allianzgi.com/zh-tw/insights/market-insight/20240110-2-geographies-of-tech
Ana Swanson, Simon Romeo (2024,2月8日)。中美關係改變貿易格局:中國已不是美國最大進口國。紐約時報中文網,檢自:https://cn.nytimes.com/business/20240208/united-states-china-mexico-trade/zh-hant/
dun & bradstreet。什麼是永續報告書?3 個永續報告書準則有什麼差異?我的企業應該撰寫永續報告書嗎?。檢自:https://www.dnb.com.tw/Thoughts/Sustainability-Report/
ECFA。兩岸簽署ECFA對台灣的經濟效益為何?檢自:https://www.ecfa.org.tw/ShowFAQ.aspx?id=11&strtype=-1&nid=35
中國商務部 (2018,7月6日)。商务部新闻发言人就美国对340亿美元中国产品加征关税发表谈话。檢自:http://www.mofcom.gov.cn/article/ae/ag/201807/20180702763232.shtml
王郁倫(2021,4月23日)。【圖解】半導體產業關鍵製程握在哪一國手裡?5大風險是未爆彈?人才為誰服務?一張圖看懂。數位時代,檢自:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/62462/semi-conductor-resilience
半導體產業鏈簡介。產業價值鏈資訊平台,檢自:https://ic.tpex.org.tw/introduce.php?ic=D000&stk_code=1410
台灣ICT產業以全球布局確保企業韌性 雙軸轉型迎合ESG環保永續趨勢 COMPUTEX建構全球數位轉型解決方案供應鏈。(2023,5月5日)。中央社,檢自:https://www.cna.com.tw/postwrite/chi/340825
田村修吾(2023,5月6日)。製造業回歸日本,建設訂單創20年來新高。日經中文網,檢自:https://zh.cn.nikkei.com/industry/propertiesconstruction/52280-2023-05-06-05-00-45.html
行政院(民 113,3月28日)。進出口貿易量。檢自:https://www.ey.gov.tw/state/6A206590076F7EF/8b5032af-1a67-4c02-bd16-8791aa459cd2
行政院(民112,3月31日)。前瞻基礎建設計畫—奠定未來30年國家發展根基。檢自:https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/45d6025c-5b15-4f87-9294-2984cd1df4d4
行政院主計總處。薪資與生產力統計。檢自:https://www.stat.gov.tw/cl.aspx?n=2712
何盈慧(2022,9月29日)。台灣機能性紡織品驗證.開創全球市場商機。經濟日報,檢自:https://money.udn.com/money/story/5635/6647313
吳元熙(2021,5月4日)。一個平台涵蓋所有關鍵製程!半導體最強生態系:台積電OIP,如何助客戶「首次投片即成功」?數位時代,檢自:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/62644/tsmc-oip-2021
卓怡君(2020,3月2日)。無法戒斷中國 電子五哥拚跨國製造。自由財經,檢自:https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/paper/1355773
林永法(民112,12月25)。美中經貿競爭下臺商如何建構雙軌供應鏈的全球布局。兩岸經貿網,檢自:https://www.seftb.org/cp-15-2178-d54fb-1.html
林建甫(2023,8月10日)。美國吸引製造業回流,是對是錯?工商時報,檢自:https://www.ctee.com.tw/news/20230810700856-431302
邱品蓉(2022,9月30日)。【圖解】晶圓廠人力、設備大拆解!蓋一座12吋廠要多少錢?人力如何分配?數位時代,檢自:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/71953/foundry-cost
邱品蓉(2023,4月11日)。【圖解】台積超車三星的祕密!Nanosheet對決GAA、先進封裝+晶圓堆疊一次懂。數位時代,檢自:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/74710/nanosheet-gaa-april-mag
紀錦玲、盧映孜(2024,4月19日)。SK海力士與台積電攜手 開發下一代HBM晶片。中央社,檢自:https://www.cna.com.tw/news/afe/202404190162.aspx
唐佩君,周慧盈(2023,12月3日)。東南亞取代中國成為外資新寵 2022年流入逾7兆元。中央社,檢自:https://www.cna.com.tw/news/acn/202312030097.aspx
翁毓嵐(2024,2月6日)。電子五哥、雙A、面板 展望金龍年與AI大趨勢。工商時報,檢自:https://www.ctee.com.tw/news/20240205700631-430502
國家發展委員會。六大核心戰略產業推動方案。檢自:https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=9614A7C859796FFA
常思穎(2023,8月8日)。美中科技戰從技術管控到投資管控 高科技背後的博弈與風險。BBC中文,檢自:https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/business-66530604
張淑伶(2024,5月14日)。美對中產品加徵關稅 專家:小院高牆走向大院圍牆。中央社,檢自:https://www.cna.com.tw/news/acn/202405140421.aspx
張淑伶,楊昇儒(2024,2月1日)。中共政治局集體學習 習近平主講科技創新。中央社,檢自:https://www.cna.com.tw/news/acn/202402010371.aspx
探究亞洲四小龍贏家的祕密。(2024,1月28日)。經濟日報,社論,檢自:https://money.udn.com/money/story/5628/7738109
許家禎(2018,6月21日)。十年有你/金融海嘯波濤中劇烈起伏 台灣經濟穩中求成長。今日新聞,檢自:https://www.nownews.com/news/2775813
許慧儀(2024, 1月 8日)。2024年美中關係走向新常態?Rti 洞察中國,檢自:https://insidechina.rti.org.tw/news/view/id/2192106
郭子菱(2019,2月27日)。歐美製造業回流 掀短鏈革命。IEK產業情報網,檢自:https://ieknet.iek.org.tw/iekrpt/linkiac.aspx?rpt_idno=260281097
郭坤臟、黃介霖、林曉因、鄧力瑋(2022,4月6日)。台積公司成功推動光阻供應鏈在地化,年產值逾新台幣10億元。台積公司官方網站,取自:https://esg.tsmc.com/ch/update/responsibleSupplyChain/caseStudy/31/index.html
賀桂芬、陳顥仁(2018,3月12日)。不怕「美國製」成本高,企業靠工業4.0回老家設廠。未來城市,檢自:https://futurecity.cw.com.tw/article/191
新聞辭典:「小院高牆」戰略。(2023,8月16日)。Rti 洞察中國,檢自:https://insidechina.rti.org.tw/news/view/id/2176937
楊卓翰(2017,1月26日)。川普拋棄TPP,埋下台灣3大經濟地雷 逆全球化危機襲台!今周刊,檢自:https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/80392/post/201701260033/
經濟部。推動五加二產業創新計畫。檢自:https://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/populace/Policy/Policy.aspx?menu_id=32800&policy_id=4
經濟部國際貿易署。中華民國進出口貿易統計。檢自:https://cuswebo.trade.gov.tw/FSC3000C?table=FSC3030F
經濟部統計處。國民所得重要指標。檢自:https://dmz26.moea.gov.tw/GA/common/Common.aspx
電子代工廠全球布局大解密。經濟日報,專題,檢自:https://money.udn.com/SSI/2023/topic_emsbranch/
電腦及週邊設備產業鏈簡介。產業價值鏈資訊平台,檢自:https://ic.tpex.org.tw/introduce.php?ic=F000
臺灣證券交易所。上市公司市值排行前二十名。檢自:https://accessibility.twse.com.tw/zh/listed/ranking.html
臺灣證券交易所。外資及陸資投資持股統計。檢自:https://www.twse.com.tw/zh/trading/foreign/mi-qfiis.html
認識半導體產業。(2022,4月18日)。台灣經濟新報TEJ,檢自:https://www.tejwin.com/insight/%e8%aa%8d%e8%ad%98%e5%8d%8a%e5%b0%8e%e9%ab%94%e7%94%a2%e6%a5%ad/
劉佩真(2023,8月14日)。台積電進入新一波全球化佈局的機會與挑戰。思想坦克,檢自:https://voicettank.org/%E5%8F%B0%E7%A9%8D%E9%9B%BB%E9%80%B2%E5%85%A5%E6%96%B0%E4%B8%80%E6%B3%A2%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E5%8C%96%E4%BD%88%E5%B1%80%E7%9A%84%E6%A9%9F%E6%9C%83%E8%88%87%E6%8C%91%E6%88%B0/
謝金河(2023,1月5日)。從90年代康師傅、鴻海等「台商西進中國潮」,到美中貿易戰後台積電護國...台灣下個30年在哪裡?今周刊,檢自:https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/183017/post/202211170035/
蘇嘉維(2024,2月20日)。半導體好威 GDP占比達13%。IEK產業情報網,檢自:https://ieknet.iek.org.tw/ieknews/news_open.aspx/?actiontype=ieknews&indu_idno=1&nsl_id=e2a51b0895364233ad6de55a0c239265
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93375-
dc.description.abstract過去,以出口為導向的企業大多倚靠國際專業分工運行生產流程,為尋求最低成本在全球各地採購原物料及零組件、加工製造、裝配…等,並透過自由貿易運輸至各地市場,導致供應鏈變得長且精細。然而,當前的環境狀況與過去大有不同,美中貿易戰、疫情、科技戰、區域衝突、國際對立等因素使全球供應鏈壓力日益升高,企業隨時可能面臨供應鏈中斷的風險。而在外在情況影響下,各國採行貿易保護主義,限制進出口、企業被迫改變全球化的生產模式,轉為區域化分工,使全球化陷入停滯的這股力量即為「逆全球化」趨勢(De-globalization)。
為因應逆全球化趨勢所帶來的變化,企業必須做好完善的策略布局及風險控管。因此,本研究以貢獻臺灣出口經濟的兩大重要產業—半導體及電子業為案例,對臺灣廠商的韌性布局方式進行探討。同時,研究也以問卷調查方式進行實證探究,了解臺灣企業管理者在當前環境下的風險認知以及對於營運韌性塑造的看法。藉由產業案例研討與問卷研究,本研究整理出可有效降低風險衝擊的策略模式—「增強營運韌性」與「提升競爭力」,前者具體實行方式為「多元化供應鏈」;後者實行方式為「增強研發與技術投資」與「深化顧客關係管理」,並提供企業建置營運韌性的建議,進而達到協助臺灣廠商在逆全球化趨勢下持續保持競爭優勢的研究目的。
本研究首先針對臺灣的總體環境進行分析,接著探究逆全球化議題,通過文獻與數據搜索列舉可證明逆全球化正在發生的事例,包含美中關係變化、貿易限制增加、海外直接投資(FDI)減少、製造業回流及科技競爭。通過外部環境分析,本研究發覺在臺灣經濟發展與出口導向息息相關的條件下,面對逆全球化趨勢,臺灣廠商必須盡快調整策略方向以迅速對應國際潮流變化,而臺灣廠商供應鏈上的轉變含括:「短鏈化」,即透過縮短供應鏈提高掌控度,降低風險、「數位化」,即導入數位科技使供應鏈效率及透明性提升、「去風險化」,即設計多條供應鏈的營運方式分散單一供應鏈可能造成的風險、「在地化」,即增強本地投資並集中資源、及「風控系統化」,即以系統性流程強化風險監控與評估。
此外,本研究以產業案例進行探討,發現以台積電為代表的半導體採用的策略布局方式為「多元供應」、「在地供應鏈升級」、「研發創新與顧客關係管理」,以及「構建生態系」;電子業廠商則選擇採用「多元生產基地」、「分散市場」,推動數位、綠能的「雙軸轉型」及「擴增技術投資」進行布局;兩者之間略有差異,半導體業更加重視穩定的供應來源與研發創新,而電子業同時考量到市場風險與未來的技術應用趨勢。另一方面,本研究透過問卷,指出當前的營運風險主要來源於六個層面—「永續及環境風險」、「市場風險」、「科技與創新風險」、「地緣政治風險」、「人員風險」與「經營變動風險」。其中,逆全球化趨勢所代表之「地緣政治風險」在整體排序中位於第三,說明管理者認可該項風險是需要關注的。而在塑造供應鏈韌性的部分,管理者則認為採取「深化顧客關係」、「運用大數據進行需求預測與庫存模擬」以及「增加研發與技術的投資」最能達到營運韌性的效用。
綜合以上研究發現,本研究建議臺灣廠商在逆全球化趨勢下的營運韌性策略應同時考量「顧客」、「組織文化」及「供應鏈防護網」三個層面。首先,通過產業案例分析及問卷調查,本研究發現臺灣廠商對於顧客關係相當重視,且普遍認為強化與顧客的關係對增強營運韌性有顯著效用。其次,在組織文化層面,廠商應強化對風險的識別能力,透過完善的風險治理架構與內部溝通,使組織在風險衝擊下能夠提供足夠資源與支持、整合與協調。在供應鏈防護網上,臺灣廠商應綜合考量營運、業務、財務方面的穩固,並著手打造以數位科技為主的供應鏈,提升敏捷性及透明性,同時強化與供應上合作夥伴的關係。本研究希望藉由三層面的營運韌性策略使臺灣廠商能夠更有效地應對不確定性的風險,在變化莫測的環境下持續生存。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn the past, most companies relied on the international professional division of labor to run their production processes, especially those in export-oriented industries. To seek the lowest cost, companies may divide their operation process into many pieces and produce or outsource worldwide; thus, supply chains become long and delicate. However, the current context has changed a lot from the past. Factors such as the US-China trade war, the epidemic, and international confrontations have put increasing pressure on the global supply chain, increasing the risk of supply chain disruption. Under the influence of external circumstances, companies are forced to change the global operation model and hedge between international powers. Such a force that brings globalization to a standstill and makes companies change is the “de-globalization” trend.
To cope with the impacts caused by the de-globalization trend, companies must build business resilience and have their strategic layout complete. Therefore, this study used two important industries that contribute significantly to Taiwan's exports, the semiconductor industry and the electronics industry, as cases to explore the risk prevention methods of Taiwanese enterprises. At the same time, the study also conducted empirical research through questionnaires to excavate the risk perceptions of Taiwanese business managers in the current environment and their perspectives on shaping business resilience.
Through industry cases and empirical research, the study analyzed strategic methods that can effectively reduce risks in two ways: “raising operational resilience” and “enhancing competitiveness”. The specific implementation method of the former can be supply chain diversifying; the latter can be R&D strengthening or customer relationship management deepening. On the other hand, this study pointed out through questionnaires that current operational risks mainly come from six levels: “sustainability and environmental risks”, “market risks”, “technology and innovation risks”, “geopolitical risks”, “human risks” and “operational change risks”. For shaping resilience, managers believed that business resilience could be achieved by “deepening customer relationships”, “using big data for demand forecasting and inventory simulation”, and “increasing investment in R&D and new technology”.
Last, this study provides enterprises with suggestions on building business resilience, thereby achieving the research purpose of assisting Taiwanese firms to maintain their competitive advantages under the trend of de-globalization. According to the research findings, Taiwanese enterprises are recommended to consider three aspects when building business resilience, including customers, risk culture, and supply chain protection. First, through industry case analysis and questionnaire surveys, the study found that Taiwanese enterprises attach great importance to customer relationships, and it is generally believed that strengthening relationships with customers has a significant effect on enhancing resilience. Second, at the level of organizational culture, enterprises should strengthen their ability in risk identification, and provide sufficient resources and support through a complete risk governance structure and internal communication under risk impacts. In supply chain protection, enterprises should comprehensively consider the stability of operations, business, and finance. The supply chain may be built with digital technology to improve agility and transparency while strengthening relationships with supply chain partners. Through these aspects, Taiwanese enterprises can deal with uncertain risks more effectively and survive in an unpredictable future.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-07-30T16:12:15Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-07-30T16:12:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii
中文摘要 iii
ABSTRACT v
目 次 viii
圖 次 xi
表 次 xiv
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究方法及流程 3
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 企業風險 5
2.1.1 風險的概念 5
2.1.2 企業風險 6
2.1.3 新興風險 9
第二節 逆全球化現象 10
第三節 營運與供應鏈管理 12
2.3.1 營運與供應鏈管理及目標 12
2.3.2 競爭優勢來源與供應鏈型態選擇 14
第四節 營運與供應鏈韌性 17
2.4.1 供應鏈中斷 17
2.4.2 供應鏈現象及影響 18
2.4.3 韌性策略 20
第三章 總體環境分析 22
第一節 臺灣經濟發展歷程 22
第二節 產業結構與經濟現況 25
3.2.1 國內生產毛額(GDP)與經濟成長率 25
3.2.2 產業結構 27
3.2.3 進出口狀況 30
3.2.4 技術發展與勞動力情形 32
第三節 臺灣的挑戰與機會 33
第四章 逆全球化衝擊與產業案例探討 37
第一節 逆全球化趨勢與衝擊 37
4.1.1 逆全球化趨勢 37
4.1.2 逆全球化所造成的衝擊 45
第二節 臺商供應鏈模式轉變 47
第三節 產業案例探討 55
4.3.1 半導體業 55
4.3.2 電子業 72
4.3.3 小結 88
第五章 風險識別與應對能力問卷分析 92
第一節 風險源建立與應對策略探討 93
5.1.1 風險源建立 93
5.1.2 風險應對策略 97
第二節 問卷設計與調查 99
5.2.1 問項及評估方式 99
5.2.2 問卷調查方式 100
第三節 結果分析 101
5.3.1基本資料統計 101
5.3.2因素分析 104
5.3.3排序分析 114
5.3.4相關性與價值階層圖 119
5.3.5 小結 126
第六章 結論與管理建議 128
第一節 研究結論 128
6.1.1 逆全球化環境下的風險 128
6.1.2 臺灣廠商的韌性建置策略 130
第二節 研究限制與管理建議 132
6.2.1 研究限制 132
6.2.2 管理建議 133
參考文獻 136
附錄一 調查問卷 152
附錄二 問項相關性分析 157
附錄三 對各產業別的風險建議 164
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject逆全球化zh_TW
dc.subject風險識別zh_TW
dc.subject營運韌性zh_TW
dc.subject供應鏈轉變zh_TW
dc.subject供應鏈韌性zh_TW
dc.subjectSupply Chain Shiftsen
dc.subjectDe-globalizationen
dc.subjectBusiness Resilienceen
dc.subjectRisk Identificationen
dc.subjectSupply Chain Resilienceen
dc.title逆全球化趨勢下臺灣廠商的營運風險與韌性布局zh_TW
dc.titleRisks and Resilience Strategies of Taiwanese Enterprises under De-globalization Trenden
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear112-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.coadvisor陸洛zh_TW
dc.contributor.coadvisorLuo Luen
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee簡睿哲;柯冠州zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeRuey-Jer Bryan Jean;Kuan-Chou Koen
dc.subject.keyword逆全球化,供應鏈轉變,營運韌性,供應鏈韌性,風險識別,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordDe-globalization,Supply Chain Shifts,Business Resilience,Supply Chain Resilience,Risk Identification,en
dc.relation.page165-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202402112-
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)-
dc.date.accepted2024-07-23-
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept商學研究所-
dc.date.embargo-lift2029-07-23-
顯示於系所單位:商學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-112-2.pdf
  此日期後於網路公開 2029-07-23
6.18 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved