請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93228完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 楊豐安 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Feng-An Yang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王若宣 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Ruo-Syuan Wang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-23T16:23:54Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-24 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-07-23 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-07-17 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Amel-Zadeh, A., & Serafeim, G. (2018). Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal, 74(3), 87-103.
Aouadi, A., & Marsat, S. (2018). Do ESG controversies matter for firm value? Evidence from international data. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 1027-1047. Beck, T., Levine, R., & Levkov, A. (2010). Big bad banks? The winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States. The Journal of Finance, 65(5), 1637-1667. Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 111-132. Campbell, D., Craven, B., & Shrives, P. (2003). Voluntary social reporting in three FTSE sectors: a comment on perception and legitimacy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(4), 558-581. Carnini Pulino, S., Ciaburri, M., Magnanelli, B. S., & Nasta, L. (2022). Does ESG disclosure influence firm performance? Sustainability, 14(13), 7595. Chen, Y.-C., Hung, M., & Wang, Y. (2018). The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 65(1), 169-190. Chen, Z., & Xie, G. (2022). ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102291. Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39-67. Connelly, B. L., Ketchen, D. J., & Slater, S. F. (2011). Toward a “theoretical toolbox” for sustainability research in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 86-100. Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures–a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282-311. Dhaliwal, D., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(4), 328-355. Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012). Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 723-759. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122-136. Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45-64. Ferri, S., Tron, A., Colantoni, F., & Savio, R. (2023). Sustainability Disclosure and IPO Performance: Exploring the Impact of ESG Reporting. Sustainability, 15(6), 5144. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press. Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In Corporate ethics and corporate governance (pp. 173-178). Springer. Friske, W., Hoelscher, S. A., & Nikolov, A. N. (2023). The impact of voluntary sustainability reporting on firm value: Insights from signaling theory. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 51(2), 372-392. Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5-21. Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporate communication and impression management–new perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 55-68. Hummel, K., & Schlick, C. (2016). The relationship between sustainability performance and sustainability disclosure–Reconciling voluntary disclosure theory and legitimacy theory. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(5), 455-476. Junior, R. M., Best, P. J., & Cotter, J. (2014). Sustainability reporting and assurance: A historical analysis on a world-wide phenomenon. Journal of Business Ethics, 120, 1-11. Khan, M. A. (2022). ESG disclosure and firm performance: A bibliometric and meta analysis. Research in International Business and Finance, 61, 101668. Kiessling, T., Isaksson, L., & Yasar, B. (2016). Market orientation and CSR: Performance implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 137, 269-284. KPMG. (2022). Big shifts, small steps. Survey of sustainability reporting 2022. In: KPMG International Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1152-1189. Laskar, N. (2018). Impact of corporate sustainability reporting on firm performance: an empirical examination in Asia. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 12(4), 571-593. Lin, Y.-E., Li, Y.-W., Cheng, T. Y., & Lam, K. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and investment efficiency: does business strategy matter? International Review of Financial Analysis, 73, 101585. Loprevite, S., Ricca, B., & Rupo, D. (2018). Performance sustainability and integrated reporting: Empirical evidence from mandatory and voluntary adoption contexts. Sustainability, 10(5), 1351. Martini, A. (2021). Socially responsible investing: from the ethical origins to the sustainable development framework of the European Union. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(11), 16874-16890. Meng, Y., & Wang, X. (2020). Do institutional investors have homogeneous influence on corporate social responsibility? Evidence from investor investment horizon. Managerial Finance, 46(3), 301-322. Moser, D. V., & Martin, P. R. (2012). A broader perspective on corporate social responsibility research in accounting. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 797-806. Moussa, A. S., & Elmarzouky, M. (2023). Does Capital Expenditure Matter for ESG Disclosure? A UK Perspective. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(10), 429. Oprean-Stan, C., Oncioiu, I., Iuga, I. C., & Stan, S. (2020). Impact of sustainability reporting and inadequate management of ESG factors on corporate performance and sustainable growth. Sustainability, 12(20), 8536. Remo-Diez, N., Mendaña-Cuervo, C., & Arenas-Parra, M. (2023). Exploring the asymmetric impact of sustainability reporting on financial performance in the utilities sector: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Utilities Policy, 84, 101650. Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077-1093. Shad, M. K., Lai, F.-W., Shamim, A., & McShane, M. (2020). The efficacy of sustainability reporting towards cost of debt and equity reduction. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 22511-22522. Tsang, A., Frost, T., & Cao, H. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure: A literature review. The British Accounting Review, 55(1), 101149. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319. WBCSD. (2002). Sustainable development reporting: Striking the balance. In: Earthprint Hertfordshire. Wong, J. B., & Zhang, Q. (2022). Stock market reactions to adverse ESG disclosure via media channels. The British Accounting Review, 54(1), 101045. Xu, X., & Wang, Y. (1999). Ownership structure and corporate governance in Chinese stock companies. China Economic Review, 10(1), 75-98. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93228 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在全球環境意識的興起下，永續發展成為企業經營中的重要議題，隨著利害關係人對企業社會責任和永續資訊的需求不斷增加，企業透過永續報告書向外界展示其在環境、社會、治理層面的表現已然成為主流，為推動上市櫃公司實踐永續揭露的責任，臺灣政府自2010年以來逐步推動上市櫃公司編製永續報告書，且研擬在未來將所有上市櫃公司列入規範。在國際政策規範及永續轉型的浪潮下，儘管眾多文獻已探討了永續資訊揭露對公司的影響，但永續報告書對公司績效產生的影響仍然存在爭議以及不確定性，且在不同國家以及文化背景下存在差異，故本研究以臺灣非金融上市櫃公司做為主要研究對象，涵蓋其2007年至2022之財務資料，旨在透過雙重差分模型（Difference-in-Differences）探討編製永續報告書對臺灣上市櫃公司財務績效的影響。
研究結果顯示，編製永續報告書對公司的財務績效具有正向影響，平均而言，公司在編製永續報告書後，其資產報酬率顯著增加了0.360個百分點，且此效果在五年內呈現上升趨勢。異質性分析結果顯示，在將資料以市場做區別後，編製永續報告書對上櫃公司的正向影響程度大於對上市公司的影響。此外，被法規強制編製永續報告書的公司在初期資產報酬率的增長效果較為有限，而自願編製報告書的公司則呈現出較大的增長幅度。最後，在替換財務績效的衡量指標後，結果顯示編製永續報告書對Tobin’s Q也具有正面影響，並對負債比率具有負面影響，表明永續報告書提升了公司的市場價值，並改善了公司的償債能力。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Amid rising global environmental consciousness, sustainable development has become crucial in corporate operations. As stakeholders' demands for corporate social responsibility and sustainability information grow, companies are increasingly using sustainability reports to disclose their performance. To promote sustainability disclosure among listed companies, the Taiwanese government has progressively mandated the preparation of sustainability reports since 2010, with plans for future comprehensive requirements. Despite extensive research on the impacts of sustainability disclosure, the effects of sustainability reports remain debated and vary across different countries and cultural contexts. Using financial data of Taiwanese non-financial listed and over-the-counter companies from 2007 to 2022, this study employs the Difference-in-Differences methodology to estimate the impact of sustainability reports on financial performance.
Results indicate that sustainability reports positively affect financial performance, with an average increase in return on assets (ROA) by 0.360 percentage points, showing an upward trend over five years. Heterogeneity analysis reveals a more pronounced positive impact on over-the-counter (OTC) companies compared to listed companies. Additionally, companies mandated by regulations showed limited initial ROA growth, whereas voluntarily reporting companies exhibited greater growth. Furthermore, substituting financial performance metrics showed that sustainability reports positively affect Tobin's Q and negatively impact the debt ratio, indicating enhanced market value and improved debt-paying ability. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-07-23T16:23:54Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-07-23T16:23:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 i
Abstract ii 目次 iii 圖次 v 表次 vi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究流程 4 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 企業永續發展與理論框架 6 第二節 永續報告書對公司績效的影響 7 第三節 臺灣永續報告書政策背景 9 第三章 資料介紹 13 第一節 資料來源與蒐集 13 第二節 研究變數定義 15 第三節 資料處理與敘述統計 18 第四章 實證模型與方法 22 第一節 雙重差分模型 22 第二節 事件分析法 23 第五章 實證結果 25 第一節 雙重差分法之實證結果 25 第二節 事件分析法之實證結果 29 第三節 編製永續報告書對其他財務績效的影響 35 第六章 結論 39 第一節 結論與建議 39 第二節 研究限制與未來研究方向 41 參考文獻 42 附錄 47 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 永續報告書 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 企業社會責任 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 財務績效 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 雙重差分模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 事件分析法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Financial Performance | en |
| dc.subject | Sustainability Report | en |
| dc.subject | Event Study | en |
| dc.subject | Difference-in-differences | en |
| dc.subject | Corporate Social Responsibility | en |
| dc.title | 編製永續報告書對公司財務績效的影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Impact of Sustainability Reporting on Corporate Financial Performance | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 何率慈;莊雅婷 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Shuay-Tsyr Ho;Yating Chuang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 永續報告書,企業社會責任,財務績效,雙重差分模型,事件分析法, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Sustainability Report,Corporate Social Responsibility,Financial Performance,Difference-in-differences,Event Study, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 50 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202401875 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-07-18 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 農業經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.35 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。