請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93144完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 劉仲恩 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | John Chung-En Liu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 崔呈瑄 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Cheng-Hsuan Tsui | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-18T16:13:04Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-19 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-07-18 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-07-12 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 朱瑞玲, & 楊淑雯. (2013年3月). 臺灣民眾的利環境態度與行為：價值觀與罪感的影響. 環境教育研究, 9(2), 頁 91-129.
朴永煥. (2019). 菩提心則忠義心—儒佛結合與台灣 [人間佛教]. 二○一八‧ 人間佛教高峰論壇輯四: 人間佛教社會思想, (頁 80-103). 吳齊殷, 傅仰止, & 蕭代基. (2021). 台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫第八期第一次調查機會執行報告. 台北: 中央研究院社會學研究所. 施奕任, & 楊文山. (2012年10月). 氣候變遷的認知與友善環境行為：紀登斯困境的經驗測試. 調查研究-方法與應用, 28, 頁 47-77. 洪立三. (2022). 臺灣民眾對於氣候變遷看法的受眾分層. 地理研究, 76, 頁 121-138. 科技部, 中央研究院環境變遷研究中心, 交通部中央氣象局, 臺灣師範大學地球科學系, & 國家災害防救科技中心. (2021). IPCC氣候變遷第六次評估報告之科學重點摘錄與臺灣氣候變遷評析更新報告. 國立臺灣大學風險社會與政策研究中心. (2023). 2023淨零轉型民意調查. 2023年12月13日 擷取 張茂桂, & 林本炫. (1992). 宗教的社會意象: 一個知識社會學的課題. 中央研究院民族學研究所集刊(74), 頁 95-123. 章英華, & 傅仰止. (2002). 社會變遷調查加入 ISSP 國際社會調查計畫. 國科會人文及社會科學簡訊, 4(2). 章英華, 杜素豪, & 廖培珊. (2011). 台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫：第六期第一次調查計畫執行報告. 台北: 中央研究院社會學研究所. 莊慶信. (2017年3月). 天主教教宗方濟各《願祢受讚頌》通諭的特色與其對臺灣生態問題的啟發. 輔仁宗教研究, 34, 頁 1-41. 陳郁安, & 謝雨生. (2016年4月). 臺灣民眾社經地位對環境行為的影響. 調查研究-方法與應用, 35, 頁 7-45. 陳家倫, & 劉怡寧. (2016). 界定宗教身分：缺乏宗教信仰面向的考察. 社會科學論叢, 10(1), 頁 1-36. 黃建勳. (2016). 瞭解等於行動？檢驗台灣民眾環境知識、友善環境價值及節能減碳行為. 社會研究學報, 2(1), 頁 59-80. 慈濟基金會. (2023年11月11日). 2023第八屆慈濟論壇. 2024年5月22日 擷取自 https://tw.tzuchi.org/2023TCForum/ 潘忻妤. (2023年4月30日). 大甲媽回鑾鎮瀾宮 年度宗教盛會創60億元產值、飆破300萬參與人次. 2023年6月8日 擷取自 上報 Up Media: https://www.upmedia.mg/news_info.php?Type=24&SerialNo=170891 鄧元尉. (2017). 宗教的生態意義：關於「生態與宗教」領域的方法論反思. 輔仁宗教研究(34), 頁 43-88. 鄧元尉. (2022年3月). 宗教與生態危機的系統關連：以永續發展為例. 思與言：人文與社會科學期刊, 60(1), 頁 92-139. 鄧元尉. (2023年8月). 生態皈依與生態認同：實踐《願祢受讚頌》的一種可能途徑. 哲學與文化, 50(8), 頁 25-41. 瞿海源. (2002). 台灣的新興宗教. 二十一世紀 (雙月刊)= Twenty-First Century, 8. 朱瑞玲, 及楊淑雯, 作者. 2013. 「臺灣民眾的利環境態度與行為：價值觀與罪感的影響」. 9(2): 91–129. 朴永煥, 作者. 2019. 「菩提心則忠義心—儒佛結合與台灣[人間佛教]」. 收入 人間佛教高峰論壇輯四: 人間佛教社會思想, , 80–103. 吳齊殷, 傅仰止及蕭代基, 作者. 2021. 台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫第八期第一次調查機會執行報告. 台北: 中央研究院社會學研究所. 施奕任, 及楊文山, 作者. 2012. 「氣候變遷的認知與友善環境行為：紀登斯困境的經驗測試」. 調查研究-方法與應用 (28): 47–77. doi:10.7014/TCYCFFYYY.201210.0047. 洪立三, 作者. 2022. 「臺灣民眾對於氣候變遷看法的受眾分層」. 地理研究 (76): 121–38. doi:10.6234/JGR.202211_(76).0005. 科技部、中央研究院環境變遷研究中心、交通部中央氣象局、 臺灣師範大學地球科學系、國家災害防救科技中心, 作者. 2021. IPCC氣候變遷第六次評估報告之科學重點摘錄與臺灣氣候變遷評析更新報告. 國立臺灣大學風險社會與政策研究中心, 作者. 2023淨零轉型民意調查. 張茂桂, 及林本炫, 作者. 1992. 「宗教的社會意象: 一個知識社會學的課題」. 中央研究院民族學研究所集刊 (74): 95–123. 章英華, 及傅仰止, 作者. 2002. 「社會變遷調查加入 ISSP 國際社會調查計畫」. 國科會人文及社會科學簡訊 4(2): 28–33. 章英華, 杜素豪及廖培珊, 作者. 2011. 灣社會變遷基本調查計畫：第六期第一次調查計畫執行報告. 台北: 中央研究院社會學研究所. 莊慶信(John B. Chuang), 作者. 2017. 「天主教教宗方濟各《願祢受讚頌》通諭的特色與其對臺灣生態問題的啟發」. 輔仁宗教研究 (34): 1–41. 陳郁安(Yu-An Chen)及謝雨生(Yeu-Sheng Hsieh), 作者. 2016. 「臺灣民眾社經地位對環境行為的影響」. 調查研究-方法與應用 (35): 7–45. doi:10.7014/TCYCFFYYY.201604_(35).0001. 陳家倫(Chia-Luen Chen)及劉怡寧(Yi-Ning Liu), 作者. 2016. 「界定宗教身分：缺乏宗教信仰面向的考察」. 社會科學論叢 10(1): 1–36. doi:10.30401/RSS.201604_10(1).0001. 黃建勳, 作者. 2016. 「瞭解等於行動？檢驗台灣民眾環境知識、友善環境價值及節能減碳行為」. 社會研究學報 2(1): 59–80. 慈濟基金會, 作者. 2023. 「2023第八屆慈濟論壇」. https://tw.tzuchi.org/2023TCForum/. 潘忻妤, 作者. 2023. 「大甲媽回鑾鎮瀾宮 年度宗教盛會創60億元產值、飆破300萬參與人次」. 上報. https://www.upmedia.mg/news_info.php?Type=24&SerialNo=170891. 鄧元尉(Teng, Yuan-wei), 作者. 2017. 「宗教的生態意義：關於『生態與宗教』領域的方法論反思」. 輔仁宗教研究 (34): 43–87. 鄧元尉(Teng, Yuan-wei), 作者. 2022. 「宗教與生態危機的系統關連：以永續發展為例」. 思與言：人文與社會科學期刊 60(1): 92–139. 鄧元尉(Teng, Yuan-wei), 作者. 2023. 「生態皈依與生態認同：實踐《願祢受讚頌》的一種可能途徑」. 哲學與文化 50(8): 25–41. 瞿海源, 作者. 2002. 「台灣的新興宗教」. 二十一世紀 (8). Boyd, H. H. (1999). Christianity and the environment in the American public. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36–44. Brooks, J. S. (2011). Buddhism, economics, and environmental values: A multilevel analysis of sustainable development efforts in Bhutan. Society & Natural Resources, 24(7), 637–655. Chen, W.-T., & Shu, C.-M. (2012). CO2 reduction for a low-carbon community: A city perspective in Taiwan. Separation and Purification Technology, 94, 154–159. Chungprampree, S. (2016). Spirituality and Ecology from a Buddhist Perspective: Engaged Buddhism Across Asia. Journal of Interreligious Studies, 19, 35–40. Clements, J. M., McCright, A. M., & Xiao, C. (2014). Green Christians? An empirical examination of environmental concern within the US general public. Organization & Environment, 27(1), 85–102. Cui, J., Jo, H., & Velasquez, M. G. (2015). The influence of Christian religiosity on managerial decisions concerning the environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 203–231. DeCoster, J. (1998). Overview of factor analysis. Tuscaloosa, AL. Dekker, P., Ester, P., & Nas, M. (1997). Religion, culture and environmental concern: An empirical cross-national analysis. Social Compass, 44(3), 443–458. Eckberg, D. L., & Blocker, T. J. (1989). Varieties of religious involvement and environmental concerns: Testing the Lynn White thesis. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 509–517. Ecklund, E. H., Scheitle, C. P., Peifer, J., & Bolger, D. (2017). Examining links between religion, evolution views, and climate change skepticism. Environment and Behavior, 49(9), 985–1006. Francis, P. (2019). Laudato Si’: On care for our common home. In Ideals and Ideologies (pp. 503–510). Routledge. Ghazali, E. M., Mutum, D. S., & Ariswibowo, N. (2018). Impact of religious values and habit on an extended green purchase behaviour model. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(6), 639–654. Greeley, A. (1993). Religion and attitudes toward the environment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 19–28. Ho, W.-L. (2016). Ecofamilism: Women, religion, and environmental protection in Taiwan. Lulu. com. Hwang, H. (2018). Do religion and religiosity affect consumers’ intentions to adopt pro-environmental behaviours? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(6), 664–674. Jenkins, W., Berry, E., & Kreider, L. B. (2018). Religion and climate change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43, 85–108. Kanagy, C. L., & Nelsen, H. M. (1995). Religion and environmental concern: Challenging the dominant assumptions. Review of Religious Research, 33–45. Kanagy, C. L., & Willits, F. K. (1993). A" greening" of religion? Some evidence from a Pennsylvania sample. Social Science Quarterly. Koehrsen, J. (2021). Muslims and climate change: How Islam, Muslim organizations, and religious leaders influence climate change perceptions and mitigation activities. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 12(3), e702. Konisky, D. M. (2018). The greening of Christianity? A study of environmental attitudes over time. Environmental Politics, 27(2), 267–291. Krylova, P. (2022). CPI visualizations_update. Tableau Public. https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/petra1128/viz/CPIvisualizations_update/ClimatePerceptionsIndex Lee, C., & Han, L. (2015). Recycling Bodhisattva: The Tzu-Chi movement’s response to global climate change. Social Compass, 62(3), 311–325. Lee, C., & Han, L. (2021). Taiwanese Buddhism and Environmentalism: A Mixed Method Study. Review of Religion and Chinese Society, 9(1), 44–69. Lin, S.-P. (2013). The gap between global issues and personal behaviors: Pro-environmental behaviors of citizens toward climate change in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 18, 773–783. Liu, Z. T. (2023). The Development and Dissemination of Pro-Environmental Dharma among Taiwan’s Humanistic Buddhists. Religions, 14(2), 273. Martin, W. C., & Bateman, C. R. (2014). Consumer religious commitment’s influence on ecocentric attitudes and behavior. Journal of Business Research, 67(2), 5–11. Mohamad, Z. F., Idris, N., Baharuddin, A., Muhammad, A., & Sulaiman, N. M. N. (2012). The role of religious community in recycling: Empirical insights from Malaysia. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 58, 143–151. Morrison, M., Duncan, R., & Parton, K. (2015). Religion does matter for climate change attitudes and behavior. PloS One, 10(8), e0134868. Ratner, B. (2009). The correlation coefficient: Its values range between+ 1/- 1, or do they? Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 17(2), 139–142. Rummel, R. J. (1967). Understanding factor analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 11(4), 444–480. Schultz, P. W., Zelezny, L., & Dalrymple, N. J. (2000). A Multinational Perspective on the Relation between Judeo-Christian Religious Beliefs and Attitudes of Environmental Concern. Environment and Behavior, 32(4), 576–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972676 Shao, J., Zhang, T., Lee, Y.-C., & Xu, Y. (2023). Does a Religious Atmosphere Impact Corporate Social Responsibility? A Comparative Study between Taoist and Buddhist Dominated Atmospheres. Religions, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14010113 Sherkat, D. E., & Ellison, C. G. (2007). Structuring the religion-environment connection: Identifying religious influences on environmental concern and activism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46(1), 71–85. Siyavooshi, M., Foroozanfar, A., & Sharifi, Y. (2019). Effect of Islamic values on green purchasing behavior. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 10(1), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-05-2017-0063 Slimak, M. W., & Dietz, T. (2006). Personal Values, Beliefs, and Ecological Risk Perception. Risk Analysis, 26(6), 1689–1705. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00832.x Sponsel, L. E. (2020). Introduction to “Religious Environmental Activism in Asia: Case Studies in Spiritual Ecology.” Religions, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11020077 Sun, Y., & Han, Z. (2018). Climate Change Risk Perception in Taiwan: Correlation with Individual and Societal Factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010091 The Time to Act is Now: A Buddhistm Declaration on Climate Change. (2015). https://fore.yale.edu/files/buddhist_climate_change_statement_5-14-15.pdf Tjernström, E., & Tietenberg, T. (2008). Do differences in attitudes explain differences in national climate change policies? Ecological Economics, 65(2), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.06.019 Tsimpo, C., & Wodon, Q. (2016). Faith Affiliation, Religiosity, and Attitudes Towards the Environment and Climate Change. The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 14(3), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2016.1215850 United Nation Environment Programme. (n.d.). Faith groups help to save disappearing forests. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/faith-groups-help-save-disappearing-forests Urbatsch, R., & Wang, Y. (2021). Are religious individuals against renewables? Exploring religious beliefs and support for government investment in energy transitions in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 81, 102283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102283 Vaidyanathan, B., Khalsa, S., & Ecklund, E. H. (2018). Naturally Ambivalent: Religion’s Role in Shaping Environmental Action. Sociology of Religion, 79(4), 472–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srx043 Wang, L., Weng Wong, P., & Elangkovan, N. A. (2020). The Influence of Religiosity on Consumer’s Green Purchase Intention Towards Green Hotel Selection in China. Journal of China Tourism Research, 16(3), 319–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388160.2019.1637318 White, L. (1967). The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis. Science, 155(3767), 1203–1207. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.155.3767.1203 Ysseldyk, R., Matheson, K., & Anisman, H. (2010). Religiosity as identity: Toward an understanding of religion from a social identity perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 60–71. Zemo, K. H., & Nigus, H. Y. (2021). Does religion promote pro-environmental behaviour? A cross-country investigation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10(1), 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2020.1796820 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93144 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 長久以來，實證研究對於宗教信仰與民眾環境態度的關聯性已有許多著墨。然而過往研究多關注以猶太教-基督教倫理（Judeo-Christianity）為主流宗教信仰的國家，少有研究將信奉其他宗教信仰的國家作為研究範疇。除此之外，過往研究對於宗教信仰與民眾環境態度的關聯性並沒有一致的結論。有鑑於前述因素，本研究以擁有多元宗教文化的台灣為例，使用〈臺灣社會變遷基本調查計畫2020第八期第一次：環境組〉 的資料進行迴歸分析，試圖探索宗教信仰之於台灣民眾環境態度與環境行為之間的關聯性。研究結果發現宗教信仰會造成民眾在環境關懷、環境政策偏好與日常環境行為出現顯著差異。值得注意的是，前述的顯著差異僅與民眾是否擁有宗教信仰有關，並與民眾實際信奉的宗教無顯著關連。真正影響民眾環境態度與環境行為的是民眾參與宗教活動的次數。民眾越投入宗教活動，其就更可能表現出較強烈的環境態度與環境行為。總結而言，本研究不僅描繪了台灣宗教與民眾環境態度和環境行為的關連性，更發現了台灣民眾參與宗教活動的頻率將有助於提升其環境態度和環境行為。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The relationship between religion and environmental attitudes has been extensively debated. However, previous literature has led to mixed conclusions, and they mostly focus on Judeo-Christian countries. To address the research gap, this study utilizes data from the 2020 Taiwan Social Change Survey, trying to portray the religion-environment correlation in a country with diverse religions. Conducting regression analysis, this research investigates the correlation between religious beliefs and various environmental dimensions, including concern, risk perception, policy preference, daily behavior, and public engagement. The findings indicate that religious belief significantly influences environmental concerns, policy preferences, and daily behavior. However, differences among specific religious beliefs are insignificant, with religiosity—rather than the particular religion—playing a crucial role in shaping environmental attitudes. This study not only sheds light on the religion-environment correlation within an Asian context but also highlights the importance of religiosity in shaping individuals’ environmental attitudes and behaviors. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-07-18T16:13:04Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-07-18T16:13:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 i
Abstract ii 1. Introduction 1 2. The complex religion-environment connection. 5 2.1. Religion engaging in environmental issue 5 2.2. Inconsistent Empirical Evidence 10 2.3. The Impact of Religiosity on Environmental Attitudes 13 3. Understanding Environmental Attitudes in Taiwan 17 3.1. Overview of the pro-environmental attitudes in Taiwan 17 3.2. The Religion-Environment Connection in Taiwan 22 4. Analysis Process 25 4.1. Data 25 4.2. Variables 26 4.2.1. Dependent Variables 26 4.2.2. Independent Variables 32 4.2.3. Control Variable 32 4.2.4. Analysis Models 37 5. Results 38 5.1. Effects of religious belief: regression analysis 39 5.1.1. Environmental Concern 39 5.1.2. Risk Perceptions 42 5.1.3. Policy Preference 44 5.1.4. Daily Behaviors 46 5.1.5. Public Engagement 49 5.2. Robustness Check 51 6. Discussion 59 6.1. Public image of religions regarding environmental issues 59 6.2. The significance of religiosity 61 7. Conclusion 63 References 66 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.title | 台灣民眾之環境態度與環境行為和其宗教信仰的關聯性實證研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | An Empirical Study of the Correlation Between Religions and Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 洪立三;廖昱凱;廖培珊 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Li-San Hung;Yu-Kai Liao;Pei-Shan Liao | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 環境態度,環境行為,宗教信仰,臺灣社會變遷基本調查, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | environmental attitudes,environmental concerns,environmental behaviors,religions,Taiwan Social Change Survey, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 71 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202401677 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-07-12 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程(含碩士班、博士班) | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 947.54 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。