請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93143完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 胡明哲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Ming-Che Hu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王力寬 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Li-Kuan Wang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-18T16:12:47Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-19 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-07-18 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-07-17 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Acerbi, C., & Tasche, D. (2002). On the Coherence of Expected Shortfall. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26, 1487-1503. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00283-2
Aerts, J. C. J. H., Botzen, W. J. W., & Werners, S. E. (2015). Portfolios of adaptation investments in water management. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20(8), 1247-1265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9540-0 Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J. M., & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent Measures of Risk. Mathematical Finance, 9(3), 203-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9965.00068 Bawa, V. S. (1975). Optimal rules for ordering uncertain prospects. Journal of Financial Economics, 2(1), 95-121. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:2:y:1975:i:1:p:95-121 Beuhler, M. (2006). Application of modern financial portfolio theory to water resource portfolios. Water Supply, 6(5), 35-41. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2006.828 Chen, N.-F., Roll, R., & Ross, S. (1986). Economic Forces and the Stock Market. The Journal of Business, 59(3), 383-403. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jnlbus:v:59:y:1986:i:3:p:383-403 Connor, G., & Korajczyk, R. A. (1995). Chapter 4 The arbitrage pricing theory and multifactor models of asset returns. In Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science (Vol. 9, pp. 87-144). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-0507(05)80048-9 Danielsson, J., & De Vries, C. G. (2000). Value-at-Risk and Extreme Returns. Annales d'Économie et de Statistique(60), 239-270. https://doi.org/10.2307/20076262 Fishburn, P. C. (1977). Mean-Risk Analysis with Risk Associated with Below-Target Returns. The American Economic Review, 67(2), 116-126. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1807225 Jensen, M. C., Black, Fischer, Scholes, Myron S. (1972). The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests. Praeger Publishers Inc. https://.com/abstract=908569 Jorion, P. (2000). Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk. Lintner, J. (1965). The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13-37. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924119 Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.2307/2975974 McGrattan, E. R., & Jagannathan, R. (1995). The CAPM Debate. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 19(4), 2-17. McNeil, A., Frey, R., & Embrechts, P. (2005). Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques, and Tools (Vol. 101). Mossin, J. (1966). Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market. Econometrica, 34(4), 768-783. https://doi.org/10.2307/1910098 Pan, D. D. (Spring 1997). An Overview of Value at Risk. The Journal of Derivatives, 4(3), 7-49. https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.1997.407971 Renault, E., Van Der Heijden, T., & Werker, B. J. M. (2022). Arbitrage Pricing Theory for Idiosyncratic Variance Factors*. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 21(5), 1403-1442. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbac008 Rockafellar, R., & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of Conditional Value-At-Risk. Journal of risk, 2, 21-42. Roll, R. (1977). A critique of the asset pricing theory's tests Part I: On past and potential testability of the theory. Journal of Financial Economics, 4(2), 129-176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(77)90009-5 Ross, S. A. (1976). The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. Journal of Economic Theory, 13(3), 341-360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(76)90046-6 Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk. The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.2307/2977928 水利署. (2023). 現有公告水庫分布及營運概況. https://www.wra.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=2868&s=7002 水利署. (2024). 台灣地區主要水庫蓄水量報告表. https://fhy.wra.gov.tw/ReservoirPage_2011/StorageCapacity.aspx 台灣環境部和國家科學及技術委員會. (2024). 國家氣候變遷科學報告2024:現象、衝擊與調適. 行政院農業委員會農糧署企劃組. (2022). 農業統計年報. 逢甲大學. (2023). 111年用水統計年報彙編. 經濟部水利署. lib.wra.gov.tw/WraLib/wSite/books_95498 陳永森、陳章波. (1999). 臺灣水資源環境空間永續利用. 黄金波, 李., 周先波. (2014). VaR与CVaR的敏感性凸性及其核估计. 中国管理科学, 22(8), 1-9. {http://www.zgglkx.com/CN/abstract/article_15015.shtml} 黃建勳. (2005). 水資源管理與自治制度:以嘉義縣沿海養殖漁業發展與地下水管制為例。 ﹝碩士論文。國立中正大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/cht8kk 黃嘉琦, 陳信宇, & 葉信富. (2023). 臺灣多時間尺度降雨集中型態之時空變化分析 [Spatiotemporal Variability of Precipitation Concentration Patterns at Multi-Time Scale in Taiwan]. 農業工程學報, 69(3), 30-44. https://doi.org/10.29974/jtae.202309_69(3).0003 楊偉甫. (2010). 台灣地區水資源利用現況與未來發展問題. 經濟部水利署南區水資源分署. (2018). 曾文南化聯通管工程計畫(核定本). 經濟部水利署南區水資源分署. (2022). 曾文南化聯通管工程計畫第1次修正(核定本). 農委會. (2021). 於乾旱期調度農業用水予工業. https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/ashx/File.ashx?FilePath=~/File/Attach/211619/File_19729337.pdf | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93143 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 台灣位於熱帶及亞熱帶的交界,年平均降水量約為2500毫米,為世界平均的2.6倍,但由於地形陡峭和土地狹小,降水難以儲存,僅有18%的降水量可利用。台灣的降水在時間和空間上分布不均,豐水期集中在每年5至10月,枯水期則在11月至次年4月。北、中、南部地區的降水量分布亦存在顯著差異,導致中、南部地區在枯水期經常面臨用水不足的問題。
現有的水資源管理面臨諸多挑戰,如水庫蓄水能力不足、管道漏水率高、農業灌溉效率低等,難以應對季節性和地區性的用水需求波動。現代投資組合理論(MPT)在資源分配和風險管理中展示了潛力,能夠通過平均數-變異數的概念分析平衡風險和回報,成為優化水資源分配的理想工具。 本研究旨在應用MPT優化台灣的水資源管理策略,以應對降水分布不均的挑戰,提高水資源利用效率。研究目標包括建立水資源分配模型、分析現有管理策略效能、優化分配策略,特別針對中、南部枯水期用水需求,並提供具體的政策建議。期望通過這些目標的實現,為台灣提供科學、有效的水資源管理解決方案,促進可持續發展。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Taiwan is located at the intersection of tropical and subtropical regions, with an average annual rainfall of about 2,500 millimeters, which is 2.6 times the world average. However, due to steep terrain and limited land area, it is difficult to store rainfall, and only 18% of it is utilizable. The distribution of rainfall in Taiwan is uneven in terms of both time and space, with the wet season concentrated from May to October and the dry season from November to April. There are also significant differences in rainfall distribution across northern, central, and southern regions, leading to frequent water shortages in central and southern regions during the dry season.
Current water resource management faces numerous challenges, such as insufficient reservoir storage capacity, high pipeline leakage rates, and low agricultural irrigation efficiency, making it difficult to cope with seasonal and regional fluctuations in water demand. Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) has shown potential in resource allocation and risk management. By applying the mean-variance concept, it can balance risk and return, making it an ideal tool for optimizing water resource allocation. This study aims to apply MPT to optimize Taiwan's water resource management strategy, addressing the challenges of uneven rainfall distribution and improving water resource utilization efficiency. The research objectives include establishing a water resource allocation model, analyzing the effectiveness of current management strategies, optimizing allocation strategies, particularly targeting water demand during the dry season in central and southern regions, and providing specific policy recommendations. By achieving these objectives, this study hopes to provide a scientific and effective solution for water resource management in Taiwan, promoting sustainable development. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-07-18T16:12:47Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-07-18T16:12:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
致謝 i 摘要 ii ABSTRACT iii 目次 iv 圖次 vi 表次 vii 第一章、 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 研究框架 3 第二章、 文獻回顧 5 2.1 投資組合理論 5 2.2 投資組合理論應用於環境問題 11 第三章、 研究方法 13 3.1 數學模型建構 13 3.2 建立南區水資源管理模型 17 3.2.1 南區用水概況 18 3.2.2 南部水資源跨系統調度 21 3.2.3 水庫操作 24 3.3 輸入資料處理 26 第四章、 結果與討論 31 4.1 輸入資料 31 4.2 模型結果-時間變化對權重的影響 32 4.3 模型結果-特定時間區間對權重的影響 36 4.4 敏感度分析 38 第五章、 結論與建議 51 5.1 結論 51 5.2 建議 51 第六章、 參考文獻 53 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 投資組合 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 水資源 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 最佳化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 乾旱 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 缺水風險 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Drought | en |
| dc.subject | Portfolio | en |
| dc.subject | Water resource | en |
| dc.subject | Optimization | en |
| dc.subject | Water shortage risk | en |
| dc.title | 投資組合理論之水資源系統管理 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Portfolio Theory Analysis of Water Resource System Management | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鄭克聲;童慶斌;蔡政安;楊豐安 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Ke-Sheng Cheng;Ching-Pin Tung;Chen-An Tsai;Feng-An Yang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 投資組合,水資源,最佳化,乾旱,缺水風險, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Portfolio,Water resource,Optimization,Drought,Water shortage risk, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 54 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202401602 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-07-18 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物環境系統工程學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 生物環境系統工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf | 4.06 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
