請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93119完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 劉啟群 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chi-Chun Liu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳俊輝 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Soon Hui Tan | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-17T16:31:02Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-18 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-07-17 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-07-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部分
1.丁友彥（2017），雲林縣麥寮地區國小教師綠色消費態度、綠色消費自我效能與綠色消費行為關係之研究。國立暨南國際大學諮商心理與人力資源發展學系終身學習與人力資源發展碩士論文。 2.王玉亭（2017），綠色美妝保養品購買意圖之研究—TPB 模型觀點。淡江大學國際企業學系研究所碩士論文。 3.王新元（1989），消費者價格認知與品質認知對其購買意願之影響-台灣地區安全帽市場實證研究，中國文化大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 4.吳苑僑（2012），隱喻廣告類型、產品類型與消費者性別差異對廣告效果的影響（碩士論文）。國立中山大學，高雄市。 5.吳萬益(2011)。企業研究方法(四版)，台北：華泰書局。 6.周子敬(2006)，結構方程模式(SEM)─精通 LISREL，台北市：全華圖書。 7.周文賢(2004) ，多變量統計分析，台北市：智勝書局。 8.林佩采（2011）。保健食品態度與消費行為之性別差異研究-以桃園縣國民小學教師為例（碩士論文）。元智大學，桃園市。 9.林羿嘉(2018)，綠色環保住宿購買意圖之研究，淡江大學國際企業學系碩士班學位論文。 10.邱皓政(2011)。結構方程模式：LISREL的理論，技術與應用。雙葉書廊。 11.洪朝陽（2005），消費者性別差異對行動商務知覺風險及購買意願影響之研究。遠東學報，22(2)，213-221。 12.高瑞敏（2022）。KOL 對消費意願影響之研究（碩士論文）。國立臺北商業大學。 13.張敬忠（2016）。不同性別之消費者對行動銀行使用意圖之研究-以計畫行為理論模型觀點（碩士論文）。淡江大學，新北市 14.張綺純（2020），台灣品牌行銷關鍵成功因素之研究，輔仁大學織品服裝學系碩士在職專班碩士論文，新北市。 15.陳順宇（2000）。多變量分析，(二版)，台北: 華泰書局。 16.陳麗珍(2018) ，低成本航空旅客之價格認知、品牌權益、策略聯盟與搭乘意願之關聯性研究，觀光與休閒管理期刊，6卷1期，pp.121 - 130。 17.麥家祥（2022），寢具業的競爭策略與商業模式_ 以C公司為例，國立清華大學經營管理碩士在職專班碩士論文，新竹市。 18.黃芳銘（2015），結構方程模式－理論與應用（五版）:五南。 19.黃慧君、黃如慧、蕭慧琦、許芳瑄、盧誌耀，(2017)。知覺價值及知覺風險對宅配晚餐購買意願之影響。民生論叢，(14)，19-35. 20.榮泰生(2005)，行銷學。台北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。 21.劉又潛 (2012)，機能性寢具客製化經營續效分析之研究-以A公司為例，環球科技大學中小企業經營策略管理研究所碩士論文，雲林縣。 22.鄭惠鎂（2014），消費者對第三方支付服務使用意圖之研究。國立彰化師範大學企業管理學系碩士論文。 23.謝足芳（2014），台灣寢具產業由經銷轉型到自創品牌之行銷策略分析：以S公司為例，國立彰化師範大學未出版論文，彰化市。 24.謝足芳（2022），消費情境、體驗行銷與廣告態度對購買意願之研究-以 S 寢飾為例，國立彰化師範大學財務金融技術學系博士論文，彰化市。 二、英文部分 1.Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of marketing, 54(1), 27-41. 2.Allport, G. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison. Handbook of Social Psychology. 3.Anderson, E. W., C. Fornell, & D. R. Lehmann (1994), Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability: Findings from Sweden, Journal of Marketing, 58(3), pp. 53-66. 4.Arnold, S.J., & Fischer, E. (1994). Sex, Gender Identity, Gender Role Attitudes, and Consumer Behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 11(2), 163-182. 5.Assael, H. (2001). Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action, 6th ed., Thomson Learning, Boston, MA. 6.Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R. & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic & Utilitarian Shopping Value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 644-656. 7.Bajs, I. P. (2013). Tourist Perceived Value, Relationship to Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intentions: The Example of the Croatian Tourist Destination Dubrovnik. Journal of Travel Research, 53(1), 1-13 8.Becker, B. W., & Connor, P. E. (1981). Personal values of the heavy user of mass media. Journal of advertising research. 9.Bentler, P. M. (1983), Confirmatory Factor Analysis via Noniterative Estimation: A Fast, Inexpensive Method , Journal of Marketing Research, 19, pp.417-424. 10.Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980), Significance Tests and Goodness-of-Fit in The Analysis of Covariance Structures, Psychological Bulletin, pp.588-600. 11.Berger, J. & Keller Fay Group (2016). Research shows micro-influencers have more impact than average consumers. Go2.experticity.com: http://go2.experticity.com/rs/288-AZS-731/images/Experticity-KellerFaySurveySummary_.pdf?_ga=2.222175320.1922164868.1515233850-1299873601.1515233850 12.Blackwell, R., D’Souza, C., Taghian, M., Miniard, P., & Engel, J. (2006).Consumer Behaviour: An Asia Pacific Approach. South Melbourne, Victoria : Thomson / South - Western. 13.Boksberger, P. E., & Melsen, L. (2011). Perceived value: a critical examination of definitions, concepts and measures for the service industry. Journal of services marketing, 25(3), 229-240. 14.Bolton, R. N., & Drew, J. H. (1991). A multistage model of customers' assessments of service quality and value. Journal of consumer research, 17(4), 375-384. 15.Breckler, S. J. (1984). Empirical Validation of Affect, Behavior, and Cognition as Distinct Components of Attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1191-1205. 16.Breivik, E., & Olsson, U. H. (2001). Adding variables to improve fit: The effect of model size on fit assessment in LISREL. Structural equation modeling: Present and future, 169-194. 17.Bunnak, V. (2009). The influence of personal values on environmental attitude, product aesthetics, and product evaluation. ProQuest. 18.Chiang, C. F., & Jang, S. C. (2006), The Effects of Perceived Price and Brand Image on Value and Purchase Intention: Leisure Aveler’s Attitudes Toward Online Hotel Booking, Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing, 15(3), pp.49-69. 19.Choi, T. M., Liu, N., Liu, S. C., Mak, J., & To, Y. T. (2010). Fast fashion brand extensions: An empirical study of consumer preferences. Journal of brand management, 17(7), 472-487. 20.Cho C.-H. & C. S. Kim (2010). A study on Korean women's bedding consumption status, purchase behavior and degree of satisfaction. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 18(3), 423-435. 21.Cyr, D., Head, M., & Larios, H. (2010). Colour appeal in website design within and across cultures: A multi-method evaluation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(1-2), 1–21. 22.Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340. 23.Dhahak, K., & Huseynov, F. (2020). The Influence of Gamification on Online Consumers' Attitude and Intention to Purchase Fast Moving Consumer Goods. Business and Economics Research Journal, 11(3), 769-791 24.Di Benedetto, C. A., Kim, W., & Lancioni, R. A. (2011). The Effects of Country and Gender Differences on Consumer Innovativeness and Decision Processes in A Highly Globalized High-Tech Product Market. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 23(5), 714-744. 25.Dodds, W. B., & Monroe, K. B. (1985). The effect of brand and price information on subjective product evaluations. ACR North American Advances. 26.Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991), The Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyer’s Product Evaluations, Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (3),pp. 307-319. 27.Donikini, R. (2013). Green Products and Green Marketing: Factors Affecting Consumers' Purchases of Green Products. Tennessee State University. 28.Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, 1(4), 269-322). New York: McGraw-Hill. 29.Engel, J. E., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (2001), Consumer Behavior (9 ed.), Chicago: Drydan Press. 30.Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior：An Introduction to Theory and Research. MA: Addison-Wesley. 31.Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., & Heilbroner, R. L. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, 278, Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Framework. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 15(1), 7-23. 32.Fivush, R., Graci, M., Grysman, A., & Merrill, N. (2016). The Influence of Gender and Gender Typicality on Autobiographical Memory across Event Types and Age Groups. Memory & Cognition, 44(6), 856-868. 33.Freberg, K., Graham, K., McCaughey, K., & Freberg, L. A. (2011). Who Are the Social Media Influencers? A Study of Public Perceptions of Personality. Public Relations Review, 37 (1), 90-92. 34.Fuljahn, A., & Moosmayer, D. C. (2010). Consumer Perceptions of Cause Related Marketing Campaigns. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(6), 543-549. 35.Geçti, F. (2014), Examining Price Perception and The Relationships among Its Dimensions via Structural Equation Modeling: A Research on Turkish Consumers, British Journal of Marketing Studies, 2, No.1, pp.1-11. 36.Grewal, D., Krishnan, R., Baker, J., & Borin, N. (1998). The effect of store name, brand name and price discounts on consumers' evaluations and purchase intentions. Journal of retailing, 74(3), 331-352. 37.Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1998). The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers’ perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions. Journal of marketing, 62(2), 46-59. 38.Hadiansah, I., Nugraha, R., Santoso, A. S., & Purwanegara, M. S. (2018). Bridging Perspectives on Customer Value Proposition and Customer Perceived Value of Intercity Non-bus Transportation Services in Indonesia. The South East Asian Journal of Management, 12(2), 105-122. 39.Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Black, W. C., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, Fifth Eds., Prentice-Hall Inc. 40.Han, H., Hsu, L. T., Lee, J.S., & Sheu, C. (2011). Are Lodging Customers Ready to Go Green? An Examination of Attitudes, Demographics, and Acofriendly Intentions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(2), 345-355. 41.Hawkins, Del I., Best, R. J., & Coney, K. A. (2004). Consumer Behavior. Building Marketing Strategy, Irwin, McGraw-Hill. 42.Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982), “Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions,” Journal of Marketing, 46, pp. 92-101. 43.Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55. 44.Huang, H. J., & Hung, Y. (2013). Gender Differences and Behavioral Integrity: From A Social Contract Perspective. Journal of Management and Organization, 19(1), 86-100. 45.Hyun-Jeong Jin, (2012). The Benefits Sought for the Bedding and Consumers’ Characteristics: Focus on the Lifestyle and Demographic Characteristics. Fashion & Textile Research Journal Volume 14(2), 242~250. 46.Jelčić, S., & Mabić, M. (2020). Perceived Customer Value And Perceived Relationship Quality In Retail. Dubrovnik: University of Dubrovnik. 47.Jöreskog, K. G. (1973), A General Method for Estimating a Linear Structural Equation System: In A. S. Goldberger & O. D. Duncan (Eds.), Structural Equation Models in the Social Science, New York: Academic, pp.85-112. 48.Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996), LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide, Scientific Software International. 49.Jöreskog, K. G., Sörbom, D., & Lisrel, V. I. (1984), Analysis of linear structural relationship by maximum likelihood, Chicago: Scientific Software. 50.Jung Choo, H., Moon, H., Kim, H., & Yoon, N. (2012). Luxury customer value. Journal of fashion marketing and management: An international journal, 16(1), 81-101. 51.Keller K.L. (2001), “Building Customer-Based Brand Equity, Marketing Management, 10(2), pp.15-19. 52.Kotler, P. (1991). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. 53.Kotler, P. (2000), Marketing Management, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. 54.Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2012). Marketing Management: Global Edition, Harlow: Pearson. 55.Kurtulus, K. & Okumuş, A. (2010), Consumers’Price Perceptions as A Segmentation Criteria: An Emerging Market Case, Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business Administration, 39., pp.21-34 Economic Review,.78(1),pp.59 56.Lee, H. (2019). The Effect of Anti-Consumption Lifestyle on Consumer’s Attitude and Purchase Intention toward Commercial Sharing Systems. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(5), 1422-1441. 57.Lee, J. E., & Watkins, B. (2016), YouTube vloggers' influence on consumer luxury brand perceptions and intentions, Journal of Business Research, 69(12), pp.5753-5760. 58.Lichtenstein, D. R., Bloch, P. H., Black, W. C. (1988), Correlates of price acceptability , Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), pp.243-252. 59.Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology. 60.Lovelock, C., & Wirtz, J. (2004). Services marketing: People. Technology, strategy, 5. 61.Low, G. S., & Lamb Jr, C. W. (2000). The measurement and dimensionality of brand associations. Journal of product & brand management, 9(6), 350-370. 62.Lu, L., & C. G. Chi. (2018). An Examination of the Perceived Value of Organic Dining. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(8), 2826-2844. 63.Luchs, M. G., & Mooradian, T. A. (2012). Sex, Personality, and Sustainable Consumer Behaviour : Elucidating the Gender Effect. Journal of Consumer Policy, 35(1), 127-144. 64.Maxwell, S. (2003), Rule-based price fairness and its effect on willingness to purchase, Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(2), pp.191-212. 65.Mehmet, A., & Gül, B. (2014). Demographic Characteristics of Consumer Buying Behavior Effects of Environmentally Friendly Products and An Application in Gaziantep. The Business & Management Review, London, 5(1), 72-82. 66.Monroe, K. B. (1990), Pricing: Making profitable decision, New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.. 67.Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1985). The Effect of Price on Subjective Product Evaluations. Perceived Quality, 1, 209-232. 68.Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1985). The Effect of Price on Subjective Product Evaluations,perceived quality : How Consumers View Stores and Merchandise, In Jacoby, J., & Olson,J. (Eds.), Perceived Quality (pp. 209-232). Lexington, MA : Lexington Books. 69.Monroe, K.B. (2003) Pricing-making profitable decisions. 3rd Edition, McGraw Hill/Irwin, New York. 70.Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989), Evaluation of Goodness-of-Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models, Psychological Bulletin, 105(3),pp. 430-445. 71.Nysveen, H., Pedersen, P. E., & Thorbjørnsen, H. (2005). Intentions to Use Mobile Services: Antecedents and Cross-Service Comparisons. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(3), 330-346. 72.Obeidat, M. S. (2015). Consumer Attitude toward Online Shopping in Jordan (Order No. 3680582). Available from ABI/INFORM Collection. (1654417127). 73.Oliver, R. L., & DeSarbo, W. S. (1988). Response Determinants in Satisfaction Judgments. The Journal of Consumer Research, 495‐507.Okada, 2005 74.Parasuraman, A., & Grewal, D. (2000). The impact of technology on the quality-value-loyalty chain: a research agenda. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 28(1), 168-174. 75.Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (1987). Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy Perspectives, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL. 76.Petrick, J. F. (2002). Development of a Multi-Dimensional Scale for Measuring the Perceived Value of a Service. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(2), 119-134. 77.Petrick, J. F., & Backman, S. J. (2002). An Examination of the Construct of Perceived Value for the Prediction of Golf Travelers’ Intentions to Revisit. Journal of Travel Research, 41(1), 38-45. 78.Rao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1989), The Effect of Price, Brand Name, and Store Name on Buyer’s Perceptions of Product Quality: An Integrative Review, Journal of Marketing Research, 26(2), pp.351-357. 79.Richardson, P. S., Jain, A. K., & Dick, A. (1996), “Household Store Brand Proneness: A Framework,” Journal of Retailing, 72(2), pp. 159-185. 80.Riley, H. C. (2001).When Does Gender Matter in Negotiation? The Case of Distributive Bargaining. Harvard University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 3025223. 81.Sánchez-Fernández, R., & Iniesta-Bonillo, M. Á. (2006). Consumer perception of value: literature review and a new conceptual framework. Journal of consumer satisfaction, dissatisfaction and complaining behavior, 19, 40. 82.Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (2000), Consumer Behavior (7 ed.), New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. 83.Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (2004). Consumer Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Pearson Education. 84.Shao, C. Y., Baker, J., &Wagner, J. A. (2004). The Effects of Appropriateness of Service Contact Personnel Dress on Customer Expectations of Services Quality and Purchase Intention: The Moderating Influences of Involvement and Gender. Journal of Business Research, 57, 1164-1176. 85.Sheth, J. N., Mittal, B, & Newman, B. I. (1999). Consumer Behavior: Consumer Behavior and Beyond. Orlando, FL: The Dryden Press. 86.Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why We Buy What We Buy: A Theory of Consumption Values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159-170. 87.Smith, J. B., & Colgate, M. (2007). Customer value creation: a practical framework. Journal of marketing theory and practice, 15(1), 7-23. 88.Susanti, V., Sumarwan, U., Simanjuntak, M., & Yusuf, E. Z. (2019). The Rational Factors of Perceived Quality and Perceived Value as the Drivers of Customer Satisfaction and Brand Loyalty. Bisnis & Birokrasi, 26(3), 132-144. 89.Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer Perceived Value: The Development of a Multiple Item Scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203-220. 90.Terenggana, C. A., Supit, H., & Utami, C. W. (2013), “Effect of Value, Consumer Trust and Attitudes Towards Intention Buy Environmentally Friendly Air Conditioners Product in South Sumatera,” Academic Research International, 4(3), pp. 323-335. 91.Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008a). Service-Dominant Logic: Continuing the Evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 1-10. 92.Voss, G.B., Parasuraman, A., & Grewal, D. (1998), The Roles of Price, Performance and Expectations in Determining Satisfaction in Service Exchanges, Journal of Marketing, 62(October), pp.46-61. 93.Wahid, N. A., & Ahmed, M. (2011), “The Effect of Attitude Toward Advertisement on Yemeni Female Consumers' Attitude Toward Brand and Purchase Intention,” Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 3(1), pp. 21-29. 94.Walsh, G., Shiu, E., & Hassan, L. M. (2014), "Replicating, Validating, and Reducing the Length of the Consumer Perceived Value Scale", Journal of Business Research, Vol. 67 (3), 260-267. 95.Wang, Y., Po Lo, H., Chi, R., & Yang, Y. (2004). An integrated framework for customer value and customer-relationship-management performance: a customer-based perspective from China. Managing service quality: an international journal, 14(2/3), 169-182. 96.Weber, A. L. (1991). Introduction to Psychology, Harper Collins College. 97.Wells, W. D., & Prensky, D. (1996). Consumer Behavior. NY: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 98.Wilkie, W. (1986). Consumer Behavior, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 99.Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: the next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 25(2), 139.Worcester, 798-844. 100.Wu, J. F., & Chang, Y. P. (2016). Multichannel integration quality, online perceived value and online purchase intention: A perspective of land-based retailers. Internet research, 26(5), 1228-1248. 101.Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of marketing, 52(3), 2-22. 102.Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality. Journal of Marketing, 31-46. 103.Zimbardo, P. G., & Gerrig, R. J. (1996). Psychology and Life. New York: Harper Collins. 三、網路部分 1.資誠聯合會計師事務所PwC Taiwan，CEO觀點(2021)，網址：https://www.pwc.tw/zh/ceo-survey/ceo-interview/interview-2021-13.html | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93119 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著科技的進步及近期全球Covid-19疫情的影響，大家對健康的意識提高，因為Covid-19疫情影響，導致較長時間待在家，所以消費者對於舒適和高品質的寢飾用品需求日益增加，藉以提高自身的睡眠和生活品質。由於在Covid-19疫情中，因為大眾行動都受到限制，所以線下實體消費都幾乎轉到線上電子商務消費，因此當進入了Covid-19後疫情時代，由於電子商務的數位科技的大幅度進步，導致實體通路與線上電子商務的銷售通路的格局發生極大的變化，而消費者的購買行為也隨之改變。
在消費行為的研究上，消費者的知覺價值在行銷策略上佔有極為重要的地位，在過去有許多學者對於消費者的知覺價值理論，提出不同方向或意涵的價值構面進行衡量探討消費者行為，則本研究選擇與寢飾用品較為相關的功利價值、美學價值、社會價值的價值構面來進行消費者行為探討，此外產品或服務的價格往往是影響消費者判斷購買的重要決策因素之一，因此本研究也將價格相關的知覺犧牲納入探討，並以態度作為中介角色討論是否影響購買意願，同時，透過性別作為干擾變數，探討消費者的購買意願是否會因為性別不同而有所差異。 本研究使用LISREL 8.7做為資料分析工具，透過結構方程模式分析驗證研究假說後，得出以下三點結論： 在台灣寢飾用品市場中，知覺價值中的美學價值及社會價值與知覺犧牲對於台灣消費者購買意願有顯著影響，而功利價值不具有顯著的影響力。 在台灣寢飾用品市場中，美學價值與知覺犧牲對台灣寢飾用品的消費者購買意願之影響過程中，態度確實扮演著極其重要的仲介角色。 在台灣寢飾用品市場中，知覺價值與知覺犧牲對於台灣消費者購買意願之影響，確實會因男女性別不同而有所差異。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | With the advancement of technology and the recent impact of the global Covid-19 pandemic, public awareness of health has increased. Due to the influence of Covid-19, people have spent longer periods at home, leading to a growing demand for comfortable and high-quality home textile products to improve their sleep and life quality. During the Covid-19 pandemic, as people's mobility was restricted, offline in-store spending almost entirely shifted to online e-commerce spending. Consequently, as we entered the post-Covid-19 era, with significant advancements in digital technology for e-commerce, the landscape of physical and online sales channels underwent tremendous transformation, and consumer purchasing behaviors changed accordingly.
In the study of consumer behavior, perceived value holds a crucial position in marketing strategies. Many scholars have proposed various directions or theories in terms of measuring perceived value to explore consumer behavior. This study focuses on evaluating consumer behavior based on utilitarian value, aesthetic value, and social value, which are more relevant to home textile products. Additionally, the price of a product or service is often a crucial factor influencing consumers' purchase decisions. Therefore, this study also includes the influence of perceived sacrifice related to price and examines consumer attitude as a mediating role to discuss whether it affects purchase intention. Simultaneously, the study explores whether consumers' purchase intention differs based on gender as a moderating variable. This study uses LISREL 8.7 as the data analysis tool. After analyzing the data using structural equation modeling to verify the research hypotheses, the following three conclusions were drawn: In the Taiwanese home textile product market, perceived aesthetic value, social value, and perceived sacrifice significantly influence Taiwanese consumers' purchase intentions, while perceived utilitarian value does not have a significant impact. In the Taiwanese home textile product market, consumer attitude plays a crucial mediating role in influencing perceived aesthetic value and perceived sacrifice on Taiwanese consumers' purchase intentions for home textile products. In the Taiwanese home textile product market, the variation of perceived value and perceived sacrifice on Taiwanese consumers' purchase intentions are affected significantly by gender differences. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-07-17T16:31:02Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-07-17T16:31:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 I
謝辭 II 中文摘要 Ⅲ Abstract Ⅳ 圖次 Ⅷ 表次 Ⅸ 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 2 第三節 研究目的 5 第四節 研究範圍 5 第五節 研究流程 5 第二章 文獻回顧 7 第一節 寢飾用品定義與產業概況之發展 7 一、 寢飾用品定義 7 二、 寢飾用品產業概況與發展 7 第二節 知覺價值定義與衡量構面 8 一、 知覺價值定義 9 二、 知覺價值衡量構面 10 三、 寢飾用品知覺價值之衡量構面 15 第三節 知覺犧牲定義與衡量構面 15 第四節 態度定義與衡量構面 17 第五節 購買意願定義與衡量構面 18 第六節 干擾變數─性別 20 第三章 研究方法 23 第一節 研究架構 23 第二節 研究假說 23 第三節 研究變數之操作性定義與衡量 25 第四節 問卷設計 29 第五節 資料分析方法 30 第四章 資料分析與結果 34 第一節 敘述性統計分析 34 第二節 信度分析 46 一、 整體樣本信度分析 46 二、 不同性別樣本信度分析 46 第三節 結構方程式模型分析 47 一、 結構方程模式模型分析 47 二、 整體模型配適度 50 三、 衡量模式評估 52 四、 研究假說與驗證結果 57 五、 結構路徑圖分析 61 第五章 結論與建議 65 第一節 研究結論 65 第二節 研究發現 67 第三節 研究限制與未來發現 68 參考文獻 69 一、中文部分 69 二、英文部分 71 三、網路部分 80 附錄 研究問卷 81 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.title | 台灣消費者對寢飾用品的購買關鍵影響因素之探討— 知覺價值觀點 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | An Investication of Taiwan Consumers’ Influencing Factors in Bedding Products Purchasing— Perceived Value Perspective | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 黃祥宇 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | Xiang-Yu Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 尤琳蕙;陳聖賢;俞明德 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Lin-Hui Yu;Sheng-Syan Chen;Min-Teh Yu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 寢飾用品,知覺價值,知覺犧牲,態度,購買意願,性別, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Home textile products,perceived value,perceived sacrifice,attitude,purchase intention,gender, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 87 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202401396 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-07-05 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 碩士在職專班會計與管理決策組 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 會計與管理決策組 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf | 3.01 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。