請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93094
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 連勇智 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Yung-Chih Lien | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳威佑 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Wei-Yu Chen | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-17T16:23:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-18 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2024-07-17 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2024-07-11 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Reference
[1]. Aguilera-Caracuel, Javier, Nuria Esther Hurtado-Torres, Juan Alberto Aragón-Correa, and Alan M. Rugman. 2013. “Differentiated Effects of Formal and Informal Institutional Distance between Countries on the Environmental Performance of Multinational Enterprises.” Journal of Business Research 66(12):2657–65. [2]. Anderson, Ronald C., Sattar A. Mansi, and David M. Reeb. 2003. “Founding Family Ownership and the Agency Cost of Debt.” Journal of Financial Economics 68(2):263–85. [3]. Démurger, Sylvie, Jeffrey D. Sachs, Wing Thye Woo, Shuming Bao, Gene Chang, and Andrew Mellinger. 2002. “Geography, Economic Policy, and Regional Development in China*.” Asian Economic Papers 1(1):146–97. [4]. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. [5]. Dong, Maggie Chuoyan, Yulin Fang, and Detmar W. Straub. 2017. “The Impact of Institutional Distance on the Joint Performance of Collaborating Firms: The Role of Adaptive Interorganizational Systems.” Information Systems Research 28(2):309–31. [6]. Dunning, John H. 1998. “Location and the Multinational Enterprise: A Neglected Factor?” Journal of International Business Studies 29(1):45–66. [7]. Eden L, Miller SR. 2004 Distance matters: liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. Adv Int Manag 16(4):187–221 [8]. Enderwick, Peter, and Peter J. Buckley. 2020. “Rising Regionalization: Will the Post-COVID-19 World See a Retreat from Globalization?” [9]. Golini, Ruggero, and Jury Gualandris. 2018. “An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Globalization, Integration and Sustainable Innovation within Manufacturing Networks.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 38. [10]. Honglin zhang, Kevin. 2005. “Why Does so Much FDI from Hong Kong and Taiwan Go to Mainland China?” China Economic Review 16(3):293–307. [11]. Kano, Liena, Eric W. K. Tsang, and Henry Wai-chung Yeung. 2020. “Global Value Chains: A Review of the Multi-Disciplinary Literature.” Journal of International Business Studies 51(4):577–622. [12]. Kim, Yongshin, and Sungho Rho. 2024. “The US–China Chip War, Economy–Security Nexus, and Asia.” Journal of Chinese Political Science. [13]. Kostova, Tatiana, Kendall Roth, and M. Tina Dacin. 2008. “Institutional Theory in the Study of Multinational Corporations: A Critique and New Directions.” Academy of Management Review 33(4):994–1006. [14]. Kostova, Tatiana, and Srilata Zaheer. 1999. “Organizational Legitimacy under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise.” The Academy of Management Review 24(1):64–81. [15]. Lemoine, Françoise, Sandra Poncet, and Deniz Ünal. 2015. “Spatial Rebalancing and Industrial Convergence in China.” China Economic Review 34:39–63. [16]. Liu, Feng-chao, Denis Fred Simon, Yu-tao Sun, and Cong Cao. 2011. “China’s Innovation Policies: Evolution, Institutional Structure, and Trajectory.” Research Policy 40(7):917–31. [17]. Lu, Xiaojing, Sebastian Jacques Manuel Boo, and Xiaming Liu. 2024. “Is the Relationship between Institutional Distance and Subsidiary Performance Moderated by Top Management Team? Evidence from Chinese Multinational Enterprises.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11(1):1–15. [18]. North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [19]. Peng, Mike W. 2002. “Towards an Institution-Based View of Business Strategy.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 19(2):251–67. [20]. Peng, Mike W., Sunny Li Sun, Brian Pinkham, and Hao Chen. 2009. “The Institution-Based View as a Third Leg for a Strategy Tripod.” ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES 23(3):63–81. [21]. Rao, D. Tripati, Narayan Sethi, Devi Prasad Dash, and Padmaja Bhujabal. 2023. “Foreign Aid, FDI and Economic Growth in South-East Asia and South Asia.” Global Business Review 24(1):31–47. [22]. Robinson, William T. 1988. “Sources of Market Pioneer Advantages: The Case of Industrial Goods Industries.” Journal of Marketing Research 25(1):87–94. [23]. Schmalensee, Richard. 1985. “Do Markets Differ Much?” The American Economic Review 75(3):341–51. [24]. Scott, W. Richard. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. SAGE Publications. [25]. Trapczynski P., Gorynia M. 2017. A double-edged sword? The moderating effects of control on firm capabilities and institutional distance in explaining foreign affiliate performance. Int Bus Rev 26(4):697–709. [26]. Wang, Dongni, and Carmen Castejón. 2024. Making Aid Work: Institutional Thresholds and FDI. [27]. Wang, Jiangyan, Suwan Han, Han Lin, Pingping Wu, and Jingfeng Yuan. 2023. “New-Type Urbanization Ecologically Reshaping China.” Heliyon 9(2):e12925. [28]. Williamson, Oliver E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press [29]. Williamson, Oliver E. 1985. The Economic Intstitutions of Capitalism. Simon and Schuster. [30]. Wu, Weijun, Ling Yuan, Xiaoming Wang, Xiaping Cao, and Sili Zhou. 2020. “Does FDI Drive Economic Growth? Evidence from City Data in China.” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 56(11):2594–2607. [31]. Xiao, C.; Ye, J.; Esteves, R.M.; Rong, C. Using Spearman’s correlation coefficients for exploratory data analysis on big dataset. Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. 2016, 28, 3866–3878. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93094 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究探討台灣電子零組件供應鏈中,海外直接投資(FDI)布局的轉變。分析台灣電子零組件產業在中國和東南亞地區的海外投資分佈,以制度環境討論對投資區域所造成企業績效的影響。通過定量分析企業層面的數據和定性評估區域政策的研究,強調過去二十年來以及新冠疫情前後,中國沿海和內陸投資的重要性。研究結果顯示,疫情前沿海的海外投資對企業績效有顯著影響,而在疫情後影響減弱,顯著性降低。另一方面,在過去二十年間,中國內陸地區投資的重要性有所增加,反映了區域政策的轉變和工業發展為海外投資區位選擇帶來影響。此外,本研究還探討了將海外投資重新定位到東南亞的現況,基於基礎設施和制度方面的挑戰,目前仍無法為企業在績效上帶來顯著的提升。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This study investigates the shift in Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) location choices within the supply chain of Taiwanese electronic components firms. By analyzing FDI distribution in China and Southeast Asia, this research explores the impact of institutional environments on firm performance. The study applies institutional theory to understand the regulatory, normative, and cognitive dimensions that influence strategic FDI decisions. Using a mixed-method approach, including quantitative analysis of firm-level data and qualitative assessments of regional policies, the research highlights the significance of coastal and inland investments in China before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings reveal that while coastal investments positively influenced firm performance in the period leading up to the pandemic, the benefits have diminished post-pandemic. On the other hand, inland investments have gained importance, reflecting regional policy shifts and industrial development. Additionally, the study examines the limited impact of FDI relocation to Southeast Asia, attributing it to infrastructural and institutional challenges. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-07-17T16:23:13Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-07-17T16:23:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Verification Letter from the Oral Examination Committee i
Acknowledgements ii 中文摘要 iii Abstract iv Contents v List of Tables vii Chapter 1 Preface 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Research Purpose 3 1.3 Framework 4 Chapter 2 Literature Review and Research Hypotheses 7 2.1 Institutional Theory 7 2.2 Institutional Effect on Subsidiaries Performance 11 2.3 China Regional Development 12 2.4 Institutional Changes in Asia 14 2.5 Research Hypotheses 18 Chapter 3 Research Methodology and Data 24 3.1 Research Context 24 3.2 Data 27 3.3 Statistical Model 32 Chapter 4 Result 37 4.1 Descriptive analysis 37 4.2 Ordinary least squares regression analysis 46 Chapter 5 Discussion and Conclusion 49 5.1 Discussion 49 5.2 Managerial Implications 50 5.3 Limitation and Future Research 50 5.4 Conclusion 51 Reference 52 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.title | 台商電子零組件供應鏈的海外投資區位選擇轉移之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Research on the Shift in Foreign Direct Investment Location Choices within the Supply Chain of Taiwanese Electronic Components Manufacturing Firms | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李彥賢;葉志權 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yen-Hsien Lee;Chih-Chuan Yeh | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 海外直接投資,制度基礎理論,電子零組件產業,區位移轉,新冠疫情, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | foreign direct investment (FDI),institutional theory,relocation,electronic components manufacturing,COVID-19, | en |
dc.relation.page | 54 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202401670 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2024-07-11 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-2.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.1 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。