請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9304
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 劉錦添(Jin-Tan Liu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chyi-Horng Lu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 盧其宏 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T20:16:44Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-07-20 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T20:16:44Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-07-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-07-04 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1 中文部分
江豐富,2006,〈外勞引進對本國勞工失業、職業選擇及薪資之影響〉,《臺灣經濟預測與政策》,37:1 (2006/10),69-111。 辛炳隆,1999,〈當前失業問題的研析與因應〉,《政策月刊》,52,19-22。 吳惠林、張清溪,1991,〈台灣地區的勞力短缺與外籍勞工問題〉,《中華經濟硏究院》。 林宗訓,2006,我國外籍勞工政策之政經分析(1999-2005),國立中興大學國際政治研究所碩士在職專班學位論文 徐美、陳明郎、吳孟道,1997,〈外籍勞工與國內生產要素間地帶互補關係之探討—以台灣製造業為例〉,《台灣經濟學會年會論文集》,1997年,65-91。 許世雄,1991,〈國內勞力短缺與外籍勞工問題之探討〉,《今日合庫》,17:6、7,38-52、48-59。 張清溪,1987,〈外籍勞工的經濟分析〉,《第五次社會科學研討會論文集》,198-223。 張信儀,1995,外籍勞工對國內產業工資結構之衝擊—VAR分析法之應用,逢甲大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。 張徽南,1999,本國與外籍勞工勞動生產力之影響研究—以橡膠加工業為例,大葉大學工業工程研究所碩士論文。 陳宗韓,1999,台灣外籍勞工政策的政治經濟分析,國立台灣大學三民主義研究所博士論文。 黃崇銘,2007,外勞引進對我國製造業男性勞動供給之影響,世新經濟所碩士論文。 單驥,1996,〈外籍勞工、技術、非技術人員與資本間替代關係之探討:以台灣製造業為例〉,《人口、就業與福利輪文集》,39-71。 趙守博,1992,〈外籍勞工的問題與對策〉,《勞工政策與勞工問題》。 劉梅君,2000,〈「廉價外勞」論述的政治經濟學批判〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》,38,59-89。 蔡青龍、林季平,2000,〈外籍勞工對本國勞工工作異動之影響分析〉,《行政院經建會》。 薛承泰、林昭禎,2004,〈外勞數量與台灣勞工就業的關係〉,《國家政策論壇》,2004年春季號,http://old.npf.org.tw/monthly/0401/theme-212.htm。 藍科正,2001,〈勞動力跨國移動政策----台灣引進外勞的經驗〉,《新經濟世紀的勞動政策》,25-65。 譚華德,2003年,泰國勞工輸出及勞工適應問題之研究--以泰國勞工在台為例,中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文。 2 英文部分 Abowd, John M., Francis Kramarz and David N. Margolis (1999a), “High Wage Workers and High Wage Firms”, Econometrica, 67, 251-333. Abowd, John M. and Kramarz, Francis (1999), “The Analysis of Labor Markets Using Matched Employer-Employee Data,” Handbook of Labor Economics, 2629-2710. Abowd, John M., Francis Kramarz (1999), “Econometric Analyses of Linked Employer-Employee Data,” Labor Economics, 6, 53-74. Abowd, John M., Francis Kramarz, David Margolis and Kenneth Troske (2001), “The Relative Importance of Employer and Employee Effects on Compensation: A Comparison of France and the United States,” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 15, 419–436. Akerlof, George A. and Janet L. Yellen (1990), “The Fair Wage-Effort Hypothesis and Unemployment,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, 255-283. Arnold, J. M. (2005), “Productivity Estimation at the Plant Level: A Practical Guide,” Processed, Bocconi University. Barron, J. M., M. C. Berger and D. A. Black (1999), “The Use of Matched Employee-Employer Data as a Means of Assessing Data Reliability with Nonclassical Measurement Error,” The Creation and Analysis of Employer-Employee Matched Data, John C. Haltiwanger, Julia I. Lane, James R. Spletzer, Jules J. M. Theeuwes and Kenneth R. Troske, eds., Amsterdam : North Holland, 419-438. Barrington, Linda and Kenneth Troske (2001), “Workforce Diversity and Productivity: An Analysis of Employer-Employee Matched Data,” mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Missouri. Becker, Gary (1971), The Economics of Discrimination, Second Edition, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Black, Sandra E. and Lisa M. Lynch (1996), “Human-Capital Investment and Productivity,” American Economic Review, 86, 263-267. Carraro, Carlo and Antoine Soubeyran (2005), “Labour Demand with Heterogeneous Workers : Migrations and Unemployment,” Research in Economics, 59, 119–136. Conrad, Cecilia (1995), “The Economic Cost of Affirmative Action,” Economic Perspectives on Affirmative Action, Margaret Simms, eds., (Washington, DC : Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies). Ethier, W.J. (1985), “International Trade and Labour Migration,” American Economic Review, 75, 691–707. Galindo-Rueda, F. and Jonathan Haskel (2005), “Skills, Workforce Characteristics and Firm-Level Productivity: Evidence from the Matched ABI/Employer Skills Survey,” IZA Discussion Paper No. 1542. Hægeland, Torbjørn and Tor Jakob Klette (1999), “Do Higher Wages Reflect Higher Productivity? Education, Gender and Experience Premiums in a Matched Plant-Worker Data Set,” The Creation and Analysis of Employer-Employee Matched Data, John C. Haltiwanger, Julia I. Lane, James R. Spletzer, Jules J. M. Theeuwes and Kenneth R. Troske, eds., Amsterdam : North Holland, 231-260. Haltiwanger, John C., Julia I. Lane and James R. Spletzer (1999), “Productivity Differences across Employers: The Roles of Employer Size, Age, and Human Capital,” American Economic Review, 89, 94-98. Haltiwanger, John C., Julia I. Lane and James R. Spletzer (2007), “Wages, Productivity, and the Dynamic Interaction of Businesses and Workers,” Labour Economics. 14, 575-602. Hamermesh, Daniel S. (1999), “Leeping into the Future of Labor Economics: the Research Potential of Linking Employer and Employee Data,” Labor Economics, 6, 25-41. Hanson, Gordon H. and Antonio Spilimbergo (1999), “Illegal Immigration, Border Enforcement, and Relative Wages: Evidence from Apprehensions at the U.S.-Mexico Border,” American Economic Review, 89(5), 1337-57. Hellerstein, J., David Neumark and Kenneth Troske (1999), “Wages, Productivity, and Worker Characteristics: Evidence from Plant-Level Production Functions and Wage Equations,” Journal of Labor Economics, 17, 409-446. Heyman, Fredrik (2005), “Pay Inequality and Firm Performance: Evidence from Matched Employer-Employee Data,” Applied Economics, 37, 1313-1327. Hildreth, A. and S. Pudney (1999), “Econometric Issues in the Analysis of Linked Cross-Section Employer-Worker Surveys,” The Creation and Analysis of Employer-Employee Matched Data, John C. Haltiwanger, Julia I. Lane, James R. Spletzer, Jules J. M. Theeuwes and Kenneth R. Troske, eds., Amsterdam : North Holland, 461-487. Idson, Todd L. and Walter Y. Oi (1999), “Workers Are More Productive in Large Firms,” American Economic Review, 89, 104-108. Iranzo, S., Fabiano Schivardi and Elisa Tosetti (2005), “Skill Dispersion and Firm Productivity: An Analysis with Employer-Employee Matched Data,” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5334. Kremer, Michael and Eric Maskin (1996), “Segregation by Skill and the Rise in Inequality,” NBER Working Paper No. 5718. Lazear, Edward P. and Sherwin Rosen (1981), “Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts,” Journal of Political Economy, 89, 841-864. Leonard, Jonathan (1984), “Anti-Discrimination or Reverse Discrimination: The Impact of Changing Demographics, Title VII and Affirmative Action on Productivity,” Journal of Human Resources, 19(2), 145-174. Levine, D. (1991), “Cohesiveness, Productivity, and Wage Dispersion,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation, 15, 237-255. Levinsohn, J. and A. Petrin. (2003a), “Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables,” Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 317–342. Levinsohn, J., Amil Petrin and Brian P. Poi (2004), “Production function estimation in Stata using inputs to control for unobservables,” The Stata Journal, 4, Number 2, 113–123. Liu, Jin-Tan, Meng-Wen Tsou and Ping Wang (2009), “Workforce Composition and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Taiwan,” Economic Inquiry, forthcoming. Mairesse, J. and N. Greenan (1999), “Using Employee-Level Data in a Firm-Level Econometric Study,” The Creation and Analysis of Employer-Employee Matched Data, John C. Haltiwanger, Julia I. Lane, James R. Spletzer, Jules J. M. Theeuwes and Kenneth R. Troske, eds., Amsterdam : North Holland, 489-512. Marschak, J., and W. H. Andrews (1944), 'Random Simultaneous Equations and the Theory of Production,' Econornetrica, 12, 143-205. Moore, Henry Ludwell (1911), Laws of Wages: An essay in statistical economics, New York : Audustus, M. Kelley. Olley, S. and A. Pakes (1996), “The Dynamics Of Productivity In The Telecommunications Equipment Industry,” Econometrica, 64, 1263-1297. Power, Laura (1998), “The Missing Link: Technology, Investment, and Productivity,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 300-313. Rosen, Sherwin (1986), “The Theory of Equalizing Differences,” Handbook of Labor Economics, O. Ashenfelter and R.Layard, eds., Amsterdam : North Holland. Tallman, Ellis W. and Ping Wang (1994), “Human Capital and Endogenous Growth,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 34, 101-124. Troske, Kenneth R. (1998), “The Worker Establishment Characteristics Database,’’ Labor Statistics Measurement Iissues, John Haltiwanger, Marilyn Manser, and Robert Topel, eds., Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press. Wedervang, F. (1965), Development of a Population of Industrial Firms. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Books. Willis, Robert J. (1986), “Wage Determinants: A Survey and Reinterpretation of Human Capital Earnings Functions,” Handbook of Labor Economics, O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard, eds., Amsterdam : North Holland. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9304 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 自1989年引進以來,外勞的爭議已久。本文期待藉實證釐清外勞的經濟效果,並找到同時利於產業、本勞、外勞的政策方向。有別於直接論證外勞與本勞為替代或互補關係,本文以1998~2003年台灣製造業、電子業工廠的Matched Employee-Employer Data為實證基礎,從「生產力分析」來觀察外勞對於工廠附加價值、平均勞動附加價值、Levinsohn-Petrin生產力、及本勞工資的影響。
控制來自工廠、員工的各個變數之後,實證結果顯示,外勞雇用在附加價值上呈現強烈邊際效益遞減的狀況,製造業、電子業雇用外勞對於附加價值分別有13.0%、13.6%的貢獻,但隨雇用每增加1%僅貢獻0.0735%、0.0327%;生產力部分,外勞雇用皆會使生產力上升20~30%左右,然而隨著雇用的外勞比例上升將造成其貢獻越趨下降;工資方面,有雇用外勞廠商其薪資較高,可能反映了工資較高因而雇用外勞的內生性,然而隨著雇用比例越高,本勞薪資明顯隨之下降,亦證實了外勞比例越高將壓低本勞工資的假設。 以「缺工」邏輯來看,實證結果代表雇用外勞可有效填補「缺工」提升生產力,但當外勞比例不斷升高,降低廠商對於本勞的勞動需求,使得本勞被取代的幅度隨之上升,促使本勞薪資下滑、工廠生產力降低。藉由控制「缺工」變數發現,「超越缺工」之工廠其附加價值、AVL、Levinsohn-Petrin生產力、工資的確皆具有下降趨勢,然而不全然顯著;產業雇用外勞效果上發現,資訊電子業引進外勞對於生產力貢獻最大,本勞薪資被壓抑的幅度較小。 由本文可看出,外勞雖對生產力有所貢獻,但隨著外勞比例越高將降低工廠生產力及本勞工資,故本文建議政策上可朝向以「真實缺工人數」作為開放標準,並提升在台外勞的勞動權益,以降低雇主以外勞取代本勞的誘因,避免因外勞比例上升而導致產業生產力、本勞工資雙雙下降的狀況。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Foreign workers have caused a lot of controversy in Taiwan since 1989 when employment of foreign workers formally took effect. This paper aims to clarify the economic effects brought by foreign workers through empirical practices, and thereby locate corresponding policy inferences. Instead of proving the relationship between foreign and local workers to be complementary or substitutional, this paper uses the Matched Employee-Employer Data of Taiwan manufacturing and electronics industry from 1998 to 2003 to analyze the productivity of foreign workers while outlining the influence of their productivity on the added value of the plants, the average added value of the labor, Levinsohn-Petrin productivity and the wages of local workers.
When all the variables induced by plants and workers are effectively controlled, the empirical results indicate that the marginal effect of the added value brought by the employment of foreign workers diminishes quickly. When foreign workers are employed in manufacturing or electronics industries, the added value will rise 13.0% and 13.6% respectively. With an increase of 1% of the foreign workers employed, however, the added value will only rise 0.0735% and 0.0327% respectively. On the part of productivity, the employment of foreign workers will elevate the productivity by 20-30% generally. With the rising of the percentage of foreign workers employed, however, their contribution to the productivity decreases accordingly. As for the wages, local workers’ average wage in plants with foreign workers employed is higher, but it may reflect the simultaneous causality that higher wages cause the employment of foreign workers. However, when the employment rate of foreign workers gets higher, the average wage of local workers becomes significantly lower, proving the hypothesis that foreign workers can bring negative impact on local workers. From the perspective of “shortage of labors,” the empirical results prove that the employment of foreign workers can effectively solve this problem and thereby raise the productivity. With the employment rate of foreign workers getting higher and higher, however, the demand of labor provided by local workers will be getting lower and lower, and the percentage of local workers replaced by foreign worker will rise, causing the lowering of wages of local workers and the decline of productivity at plants. When the variable “shortage of labors” is controlled, the added value, AVL, Levinsohn-Petrin productivity, and the average wages of local workers of those plants that are 'beyond the shortage of labors' all demonstrate a downward trend, but not entirely obvious. On the other hand, we can see that, when compared to other industries, employment of foreign workers in the information & electronics industry induces highest productivity growth and brings the least impact on the wages of local workers. In conclusion, in spite of the contribution to productivity, higher proportion of foreign workers would reduce both the plant productivity and the wages of local workers. Therefore, the inference of the result is that when opening up the vacancies to foreign workers, our government should base on the 'real number of the shortage of labors,' while improving the labor rights of foreign workers in Taiwan at the same time. As a result, the incentives for employers to employ foreign workers to replace local ones will be reduced, and the decline in the plant productivity and wages of local workers propelled by increased proportion of foreign workers can thus be avoided. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T20:16:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R96323036-1.pdf: 5931047 bytes, checksum: 2dddc72a67a9c37f1efae6ad7d9a58d1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭.......................................................i
中文摘要..................................................ii 英文摘要.................................................iii 第一章 前言...............................................1 1.1 研究動機............................................1 1.2 外勞現狀............................................1 1.3 研究方法及結果......................................3 第二章 文獻回顧...........................................6 2.1 外勞形成............................................6 2.2 外勞引進所造成之經濟效果............................9 2.2.1 對產業影響......................................9 2.2.2 對本勞雇用及薪資影響...........................10 2.2.2.1 與本勞部分替代、部分互補...................10 2.2.2.2 與技術及非技術工皆具替代關係...............11 2.2.2.3 外勞比例上升使本勞失業機率上升、工資下降...11 2.3 合併資料與生產力分析...............................12 2.3.1 合併資料的優點及問題...........................12 2.3.2 合併資料的模型運用.............................14 2.3.3 廠商與員工特性對廠商生產力與工資之影響.........15 第三章 製造業外勞背景....................................19 第四章 資料來源介紹......................................23 第五章 計量方法與資料敘述.................................25 5.1 實證模型...........................................25 5.1.1 附加價值.......................................25 5.1.2 平均勞動附加價值(Average Value-added of Labor).26 5.1.3 Levinsohn-Petrin生產力.........................26 5.1.4 本國勞工工資...................................29 5.2 資料敘述...........................................30 5.2.1 生產要素變數...................................33 5.2.2 外勞虛擬變數...................................35 5.2.3 工廠特性變數...................................39 5.2.4 員工特性變數...................................40 5.2.5 二欄位產業、年份變數...........................40 5.2.6 電子業各變數...................................44 第六章 實證結果..........................................48 6.1 變數預期方向.......................................48 6.2 製造業之實證結果...................................50 6.2.1 附加價值之估計.................................51 6.2.2 平均勞動附加價值之估計.........................56 6.2.3 Levinsohn-Petrin生產力之估計...................60 6.2.4 國內勞工工資之估計.............................65 6.2.5 製造業小結.....................................70 6.3 電子業工廠之實證結果...............................72 6.3.1 附加價值之估計.................................72 6.3.2 平均勞動附加價值之估計.........................72 6.3.3 Levinsohn-Petrin生產力之估計...................73 6.3.4 國內勞工工資之估計.............................73 6.4 內生性問題與限制...................................83 第七章 結論、研究限制及未來研究方向......................87 7.1 結論及政策意涵.....................................87 7.2 研究限制及未來研究方向.............................89 參考文獻..................................................91 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 外籍勞工雇用對廠商生產力及薪資之影響—台灣製造業之實證研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Effect of Foreign Workers on Plant Productivity and Wage— Evidence from Taiwan Manufacturing Industry | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林明仁(Ming-Jen Lin),駱明慶(Ming-Ching Luoh) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 外勞,生產力,薪資,缺工,製造業,電子業,合併資料, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | foreign worker,productivity,wage,shortage of labors,manufacturing industry,electronics industry,Matched Employee-Employer Data, | en |
dc.relation.page | 95 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-07-06 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf | 5.79 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。