請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93001完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張仁和 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Jen-Ho Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 盧亦威 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi-Wei Lu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-12T16:13:06Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-13 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-07-12 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-07-10 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 于若蓉、黃奕嘉（2018）：〈家庭動態調查：樣本結構、問卷內容、資料外釋與應用〉。《中國統計學報》，56（4），98-115。
外電編譯（2023年12月26日）：〈用「交友軟體」找結婚對象可行嗎？ 研究揭殘酷真相：婚後感情穩定度恐較差〉。潮健康。 https://blog.coolhealth.com.tw/2023/12/26/online-dating-and-marriage 伊慶春、熊瑞梅（1994）：〈擇偶過程之網絡與婚姻關係：對介紹人、婚姻配對和婚姻滿意度之分析〉。《中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所專書》，33，135-177。 吳怡萱（2022年11月29日）：〈同事愛幫自己介紹對象 他苦惱：真的沒必要〉。Yahoo!新聞。 https://tw.news.yahoo.com/同事-介紹-對象-080647831.html 李鴻典（2023年3月11日）：〈都什麼年代了還在相親？作家曝關鍵：表示你值得人關懷〉。三立新聞網。 https://ynews.page.link/xcjL2 匿名（2023年9月22日）：〈相親後我決定單身下去〉。Dcard。 https://www.dcard.tw/f/relationship/p/253365698 陳慧軒（2009）：《與配偶認識方式之期間分析：臺灣與中國之實證研究》（碩士論文，國立中央大學），臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/hxnu4h。 楊瑩（2008）：〈臺灣高等教育政策改革與發展〉。《研習資訊》，25（6），21-56。 Allendorf, K., & Ghimire, D. J. (2013). Determinants of marital quality in an arranged marriage society. Social Science Research, 42(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.09.002 Blais, M. R., Sabourin, S., Boucher, C., & Vallerand, R. J. (1990). Toward a motivational model of couple happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 1021–1031. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.1021 Bossard, J. H. S. (1932). Residential propinquity in marriage selection. American Journal of Sociology, 38, 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1086/216031 Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., Gonzaga, G. C., Ogburn, E. L., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2013). Marital satisfaction and break-ups differ across on-line and off-line meeting venues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(25), 10135–10140. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222447110 Chen, J. Y. Y., & Lim, S. L. (2012). Factors impacting marital satisfaction among urban Mainland Chinese women: A qualitative study. Asia Pacific Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 3(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507686.2012.705306 Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(1), 3-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436522 Goldstein, J. R., & Kenney, C. T. (2001). Marriage delayed or marriage forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for U.S. women. American Sociological Review, 66, 506-519. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088920 Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd edition). New York: The Guilford Press. Hodgins, H. S., Liebeskind, E., & Schwartz, W. (1996). Getting out of hot water: Facework in social predicaments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.300 Huang H. (2019, July 30) "We met on Tinder, and now we're getting married!” Who says dating apps don't lead to true love? #TinderWedding proves you can find love online too! ELLE. https://www.elle.com.hk/life/tinder-couple-wedding Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3 Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 472–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.472 Knee, C. R., Lonsbary, C., Canevello, A., & Patrick, H. (2005). Self-determination and conflict in romantic relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology, 89(6), 997–1009. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.997 Kurdek, L. A. (1999). The nature and predictors of the trajectory of change in marital quality for husbands and wives over the first 10 years of marriage. Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 1283–1296. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.5.1283 Lampard, R. (2020). Meeting online or offline? Patterns and trends for co-resident couples in early 21st-century Britain. Sociological Research Online, 25(4), 589-608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780419895524 Manning, W. D., Brown, S. L., & Payne, K. K. (2014). Two decades of stability and change in age at first union formation. Journal of marriage and the family, 76(2), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12090 Myers, J. E., Madathil, J., & Tingle, L. R. (2005). Marriage satisfaction and wellness in India and the United States: A preliminary comparison of arranged marriages and marriages of choice. Journal of Counseling & Development, 83(2), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2005.tb00595.x Patrick, H., Knee, C. R., Canevello, A., & Lonsbary, C. (2007). The role of need fulfillment in relationship functioning and well-being: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 434–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.434 Rosenfeid, M. J., Thomas, R. J., & Hausen, S. (2019). Disintermediating your friends: How online dating in the United States displaces other ways of meeting. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(36), 17753–17758. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908630116 Rosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412448050 Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16(2), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(80)90007-4 Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 Sharabi, L. L., & Dorrance-Hall, E. (2024). The online dating effect: Where a couple meets predicts the quality of their marriage. Computers in Human Behavior, 150, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107973 Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1995). Coherence and congruence: Two aspects of personality integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 531–543. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.531 Simon R. W. (2002). Revisiting the relationships among gender, marital status, and mental health. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 1065–1096. https://doi.org/10.1086/339225 Tao, H. L. (2019). Marriage and happiness: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20, 1843-1861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0029-5 Xiaohe, X., & Whyte, M. K. (1990). Love matches and arranged marriages: A Chinese replication. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52(3), 709–722. https://doi.org/10.2307/352936 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93001 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著時代變遷，經濟和教育發展使得人們對婚姻的看法有了很大的改變。過去，婚姻多由家人安排相親或親友介紹對象，而現在更多的人選擇自主認識配偶。若根據自我決定論（Self-Determination Theory），自主選擇婚姻伴侶會增加個人和社會的適應性，並有助於維持穩定的婚姻關係。然而，自主認識也可能是透過投資模型（Investment Theory）所運行，當個體遇到更具吸引力的替代選項時，有更大的可能離開關係。本研究透過1999至2022年臺灣家庭動態調查（PSFD）之配偶及同居樣本共6,351人，探討自主認識對於婚姻品質與穩定性之影響。結果顯示，整體結婚年齡隨著年代發展而變晚，且自主與非自主認識的結婚年齡差距擴大。自主認識較符合投資模型的理論，配偶會預測較不穩定的婚姻狀態。控制性別的影響後，婚姻時長及自主認識都不影響婚姻品質。最後，自主認識下，女性婚姻品質較差的情況會改善。總結而言，雖然自主認識的人數上升，但是選擇適合自己的認識方式更為重要。同時，我們建議社會應持續建立女性自主認識的支持環境。此研究結果整理配偶認識方式之趨勢變化以及整合性看法，希望能為未來相關研究提供有價值的參考，推動領域進一步發展。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The methods of meeting couples have undergone significant changes, shifting from arranged introductions by family and friends to autonomous partner selection. According to Self-Determination Theory (SDT), autonomously choosing a partner tends to result in better marital quality. Autonomous meeting may also operate through the framework of Investment Theory, wherein individuals encountering more attractive alternatives are more likely to exit relationships. Therefore, it is worthwhile to investigate which method, autonomous or non-autonomous partner selection, contributes to better marital quality. This study, utilizing data from the Taiwan Panel Study of Family Dynamics (PSFD) spanning from 1999 to 2022, comprising a sample of 6,351 married and cohabitating individuals, and then examine the impact of autonomous meeting couples on relationship quality and stability. The findings indicate that overall marriage age is progressively increasing with generational shifts, and the age gap between autonomous and non-autonomous partner selection is widening. Autonomous meeting aligns more closely with the theory of Investment Model, where partners predict relatively unstable marital statuses. After controlling for gender, neither marriage duration nor autonomous partner selection significantly affects marital quality. Furthermore, under autonomous partner selection, the quality of marriages among women tends to improve in adverse situations. In conclusion, while both autonomous and non-autonomous methods of partner selection can be effective. Therefore, establishing supportive environments for autonomous partner selection is imperative. This study summarizes the changing trends in partner selection methods and their relationship with marital quality, aiming to aid future research development. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-07-12T16:13:06Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-07-12T16:13:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 文獻回顧 3 第二章 研究方法 9 第一節 資料來源 9 第二節 變項選擇與資料整理 10 第三節 分析方法 12 第三章 研究結果 14 第一節 趨勢介紹 14 第二節 描述統計 24 第三節 結婚年代對認識配偶的自主性與年齡調節分析 24 第四節 自主認識配偶與離婚分居關係探討 27 第五節 婚姻時長對自主認識配偶與婚姻品質調節分析 27 第六節 性別對自主認識配偶預測婚姻品質調節分析 30 第四章 討論 33 第一節 綜合討論 33 第二節 研究限制與未來建議 36 第三節 結論 37 參考文獻 38 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.title | 配偶認識方式之趨勢與婚姻品質之關聯： 以臺灣家庭動態調查之分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Trends in Methods of Meeting Couples and Their Relationship with Marital Quality: An analyst of the Taiwan PSFD Database | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 李怡青 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | I-Ching Lee | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 郭郡羽;林瑋芳 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chun-Yu Kuo;Wei-Fang Lin | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 配偶認識趨勢,自我決定論,投資模型,婚姻品質,婚姻穩定, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | meeting couples,SDT,Investment Theory,marriage quality,marriage stability, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 42 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202401622 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-07-10 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2027-12-25 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf 此日期後於網路公開 2027-12-25 | 2.27 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。