Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 商學組
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92842
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor郭佳瑋zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorChia-Wei Kuoen
dc.contributor.author王惠民zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHui-Ming Wangen
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-02T16:14:43Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-03-
dc.date.copyright2024-07-02-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.date.submitted2024-06-24-
dc.identifier.citation[1] S. Kinnery, 2018. Fronthaul specs for virtualized RAN approved by xRAN Forum, RCR Wireless News.
[2] C.L. I, J. Huang, R. Duan, C. Cui, J. Jiang, and L. Li,2014. Recent Progress on C-RAN Centralization and Cloudification, IEEE Access, vol.2, pp.1030-1039.
[3] O-RAN Alliance, https://www.o-ran.org.
[4] P. Tavares, 2021. The Open Future of Radio Access Networks, Deloitte.
[5] J. P. Tomás, 2024. The Current State of 5G Deployments in India, RCR Wireless News.
[6] O-RAN Specifications, https://www.o-ran.org/specifications.
[7] 蔡文彬,2023。臺灣大學EMBA動態競爭課程講義。
[8] D. Kondrashov, E. Rogozhnikov, R. Abenov, S. Novichkov, E. Ageev, 2023. Calculation of the Total Cost of Ownership of 5G Network for Different Types of Architecture: Distributed RAN, Centralized RAN and Open RAN, Proceedings on Engineering Sciences, vol. 5, no.1, pp.73-84.
[9] M. Masoudi, S. S. Lisi, C. Cavdar, 2020. Cost-effective Migration towards Virtualized C-RAN with Scalable Fronthaul Design, IEEE Systems Journal, vol.14, iss.4, pp.5100-5110.
[10] R. Pascal and R. Kompany, 2023. Open vRAN and vRAN Market Tracker – 1H23 Analysis, Omdia.
[11] Mavenir, 2024. Proven Open and Interoperable Ecosystem Fuels Open RAN’s Momentum, https://www.mavenir.com/blog/proven-open-and-interoperable-ecosystem-fuels-open-rans-momentum/.
[12] M. -J. Chen, 1996. Competitor Analysis and Interfirm Rivalry: Toward a Theoretical Integration, The Academy of Management Review, vol.21, no.1, pp.100-134.
[13] M. -J. Chen and D. C. Hambrick, 1995. Speed, Stealth, and Selective Attack: How Small Firms Differ from Large Firms in Competitive Behavior, Academy of Management Journal, vol.38, iss.2, pp.453-482.
[14] M. -J. Chen, K. -H. Su and W. Tsai, 2007. Competitive Tension: The Awareness-Motivation-Capability Perspective, Academy of Management Journal, vol.50, iss.1, pp.101-118.
[15] M. Shamsuzzaman, and S. M. Jahan, 2018. Revisiting the Awareness-Motivation-Capability(AMC) Model of Competitive Dynamics: An Augmented-AMC Framework, The Business and Management Review, vol.9, no.4, pp.515-527.
[16] D. C. Hambrick and J. W. Fredrickson, 2005. Are You Sure You Have a Strategy? The Academy of Management Executive, vol.19, no.4, pp.51-62.
[17] 蔡文彬,2023。臺灣大學EMBA策略思維的架構課程講義。
[18] K. R. Harrigan, 1985. An Application of Clustering for Strategic Group Analysis, Strategic Management Journal, vol.6, pp.55-73.
[19] G. S. Day, 1981. Strategic Market Analysis and Definition: An Integrated Approach, Strategic Management Journal, vol.2, pp.281-299.
[20] J. A. C. Baum and H. J. Korn, 1996. Competitive Dynamics of Interfirm Rivalry, Academy of Management Journal, vol.39, pp.255-291.
[21] C. A. Montgomery, 1985. Product Diversification and Market Power, Academy of Management Journal, vol.28, pp.789-798.
[22] M. -J. Chen and I. C. MacMillan, 1992. Nonresponse and Delayed Response to Competitive Moves: The Roles of Competitor Dependence and Action Irreversibility, Academy of Management Journal, vol.35, pp.539-570.
[23] J. B. Barney, 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, vol.17, pp.99-120.
[24] D. J. Collis, 1991. A Resource-based Analysis of Global Competition: The Case of the Bearings Industry, Strategic Management Journal, vol.12, pp.49-68.
[25] R. Amit and P. J. H. Schoemaker, 1993. Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent, Strategic Management Journal, vol.14, pp.33-46.
[26] A. Osterwalder, Y. Pigneur, G. Bernarda and A. Smith, 2014. Value Proposition Design, Wiley.
[27] 李吉仁,2019。驅動轉型成為轉機,哈佛商業評論全球繁體中文版。
[28] 3GPP, 2017. Study on New Radio Access Technology: Radio Access Architecture and Interfaces, 3GPP Technical Report (TR) 38.801.
[29] M. Polese, L. Bonati, S. D’Oro, S. Basagni, T. Melodia, 2023. Understanding O-RAN: Architecture, Interfaces, Algorithms, Security, and Research Challenges, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol.25, no.2, pp.1376-1411.
[30] O-RAN Fronthaul Working Group, 2021. Control, User and Synchronization Plane Specification 6.00, O-RAN WG4 Technical Specification.
[31] O-RAN Working Group 1, 2021. O-RAN Architecture Description 5.00, O-RAN WG1 Technical Specification.
[32] O-RAN Working Group 2, 2021. O-RAN Non-RT RIC Architecture 1.0, O-RAN.WG2.Non-RT-RIC-ARCH-TS-v01.00 Technical Specification.
[33] O-RAN Working Group 2, 2021. O-RAN AI/ML Workflow Description and Requirements 1.03, O-RAN.WG2.AIML-v01.03 Technical Specification.
[34] O-RAN Working Group 3, 2021. O-RAN Near-RT RAN Intelligent Controller RIC Architecture 2.0, O-RAN.WG3.RICARCH-v02.00 Technical Specification.
[35] C.L. I, C. Rowell, S. Han, Z. Xu, G. Li, and Z. Pan, 2014. Toward green and soft: a 5G perspective, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol.52, no.2, pp. 66-73.
[36] J. Luo, Q. Chen, and L. Tang, 2018. Reducing Power Consumption by Joint Sleeping Strategy and Power Control in Delay-Aware C-RAN, IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 14655-14667.
[37] O-RAN Working Group 4, Conformance Test Specification, v03.00.
[38] O-RAN Working Group 4, Fronthaul Interoperability Test Specification(IoT), v04.00.
[39] O-RAN Working Group 4, Management Plane Specification, v03.00.
[40] G. A. Moore, 2014. Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling Disruptive Products to Mainstream Customers, Harper Business, 3rd Edition.
[41] M. Mink, 2020. How the Clean Network Alliance of Democracies Turned the Tide on Huawei in 5G, Life&News, Dec. 2nd.
[42] F. Pedersen, R. Högman, M. Buchmayer, G. Lemne, and A. Zaidi, 2022. 5G Spectrum for Local Industrial Networks, Ericsson White Paper.
[43] Vodafone Technology News, 2023. Orange and Vodafone to cooperate on Open RAN network sharing in rural areas across Europe.
[44] Precedence Research, 2024. Open RAN Market – Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends, Regional Outlook, and Forecast 2024-2033.
[45] E. Buckland, P. Laidler, D. Martin, 2021. O-RAN: What is worth? Global O-RAN capex forecast 2020-2030, modelling operator investments across four migration pathways, STL Partners.
[46] AI-RAN Alliance, https://ai-ran.org.
[47] A. Zwarico (AT&T), S. Jeux (Orange), et al., 2024. The O-RAN Alliance Security Task Group Tackles Security Challenges on All O-RAN Interfaces and Components, O-RAN Alliance.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92842-
dc.description.abstract現行基建設備市場主要由Ericsson、Nokia與Huawei等國際一線供應商所主導,採用的是傳統封閉式架構,不同供應商的設備彼此間無法做到互容,行動通信運營業者常需綁定某一家設備供應商,因選擇性低、交易成本高,造成運營缺乏彈性且被動。 由AT&T、China Mobile、Deutsche Telekom、NTT Docomo與Orange等國際一線行動通信運營商發起成立的O-RAN Alliance,致力推行開放式架構與介面標準化,解決封閉式架構的侷限性,讓不同供應商的設備彼此間可以互容,因此吸引了許多新進電信設備的廠商投入。
開放式架構為電信設備產品提供了有利的競爭條件,能否成為系統廠的IDM產品轉型標的,值得關注與研究。本論文研究的目的是希望透過量化分析的方式,探詢O-RAN技術是否具有進入市場的競爭力?O-RU設備產品是否具有發展IDM商業模式的機會? 以及透過質性分析的方式,建構台灣系統廠從CM/ODM到IDM產品轉型的策略思維。使用的研究方法:(1)量化分析TCO模型,檢視O-RAN技術的成本競爭力;(2)量化分析自建MC-RS模型,探詢O-RU發展IDM商業模式的機會;(3)透過質性分析方式,設計O-RU的IDM轉型策略。得到研究結果:(1)O-RAN的TCO明顯低於D-RAN與C-RAN,O-RAN的電源能源消耗亦低於D-RAN與C-RAN;(2)O-RAN的市占率預期將超越傳統封閉式產品,營收佔比最高的產品為O-RU;(3)透過競爭者標示地圖與AMC評估表的解析,預期O-RU產品有機會發展IDM商業模式。
透過量化分析與質性分析,本論文的研究結論為:(1)透過TCO的量化分析比較,基於O-RAN的電信設備產品,具備衝擊現有市場生態的競爭力,也更符合ESG的要求與對綠色科技的期待;(2)透過設備供應商的營收與電信運營商的資本支出數據之分析,O-RAN產品市占率預期將超越現有傳統封閉式產品,成為基建設備市場的主流;(3)透過本論文自建MC-RS模型的量化分析,與產業動態競爭分析,O-RU設備產品具有發展IDM商業模式的機會;(4)應用鑽石模型的質性分析,設計O-RU產品的IDM轉型策略,與建構轉型策略的思維。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe current infrastructure equipment market is mainly dominated by international Tier-1 vendors such as Ericsson, Nokia and Huawei. It adopts a traditional architecture, equipment from different vendors cannot be interoperable with each other. Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) are often bound to a certain equipment vendor, thus resulted in inflexible and passive operations due to lower selectivity and higher transaction costs. The O-RAN Alliance was initiated and established by international leading MNOs such as AT&T, China Mobile, Deutsche Telekom, NTT Docomo and Orange. It is committed to promoting open architecture and standardized interfaces, solving the limitations of traditional architecture, and allowing the equipment from different vendors interoperable with each other. Thus, this new technology appeals to quite a few companies.
Open architecture brings favorable competitive conditions to teleco equipment products. Whether it can become the target of IDM product transformation for manufacturers is worthy of attention and research. The purpose of this thesis is, through quantitative analysis, to explore the competitiveness of O-RAN technology to enter the market, and the opportunities for O-RU vendors to adopt IDM business model. Also construct the strategic thinking for O-RU vendors regarding the product transformation from CM/ODM to IDM through qualitative analysis. The approaching methodologies used are: (1) Quantitative analysis of the TCO model to examine the cost competitiveness of O-RAN technology; (2) Quantitative analysis of the own-built MC-RS model to explore the opportunities for O-RU vendor to adopt IDM business models.; (3) Design of IDM transformation strategy for O-RU product through qualitative analysis. Key results been obtained are: (1) The TCO of O-RAN is significantly lower than those of D-RAN and C-RAN, and so does the power energy consumption; (2) The market share of O-RAN is expected to exceed that of traditional architecture, and the product with the highest revenue share is O-RU; (3) Through the analysis of the competitor map and AMC table, it is expected that O-RU vendors will have opportunities to adopt the IDM business model.
Through both quantitative and qualitative analysis, in this thesis, several key conclusions obtained are: (1) Through TCO analysis and comparison, O-RAN shows that it's competitive to impact the existing market ecology, also shows it's more compliant to ESG requirements, and more in line with expectations to green technology; (2) Through data analysis of equipment vendors’ revenue and MNOs’ capital expenditure, the market share of O-RAN is expected to exceed existing traditional architecture, and becomes the mainstream of the infrastructure equipment market; (3) Through the quantitative analysis of the own-built MC-RS model and the dynamic competition analysis of industry, it shows that O-RU vendors have opportunities to adopt the IDM business models; (4) In this thesis, the Diamond Model had been applied for the qualitative analysis of IDM transformation strategy, the design of IDM transformation strategy for O-RU vendors, and the constructing the strategic thinking of corporate transformation.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-07-02T16:14:43Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-07-02T16:14:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents目次
口試委員會審定書I
謝辭 II
中文摘要 III
THESIS ABSTRACT IV
目次 VI
圖次 VIII
表次 X
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 2
1.3 研究方法 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
2.1 基建架構TCO模型分析 4
2.2 MC-RS模型分析法 4
2.3 AMC分析法 6
2.4 鑽石模型分析法 6
2.5 商業模式九宮格 7
2.6 C-SOP分析法 9
第三章 O-RAN基建設備產業現況與趨勢 11
3.1 O-RAN基建架構介紹 11
3.2 O-RAN設備產業發展趨勢 14
3.3 O-RAN產業生態系統 20
3.4 5G RAN架構TCO模型比較 23
3.5 TCO模型量化分析與比較 30
第四章 研究結果與分析 42
4.1 O-RU產品競爭者分析 42
4.2 O-RU動態競爭分析 49
4.3 O-RU產品IDM轉型策略分析 51
第五章 結論與建議 60
5.1 研究結論 60
5.2 研究限制 62
5.3 未來研究方向 62
參考文獻 64

圖次
圖2.1 :鑽石模型:策略五要素 10
圖3.1 :O-RAN網路系統的基建架構 12
圖3.2 :5G O-RAN設備產品技術生命週期 15
圖3.3 :2022-27 Open RAN設備營收預測 17
圖3.4 :2023-33 Open RAN設備營收預測 17
圖3.5 :2022-27 Open RAN設備營收預測(產品分類) 18
圖3.6 :O-RAN forecast: Four migration pathways for brownfield operators 19
圖3.7 :Proven Open and Interoperable Open RAN Ecosystem 20
圖3.8 :D-RAN基站設備佈建架構 24
圖3.9 :C-RAN基站設備佈建架構 26
圖3.10:O-RAN基站設備佈建架構 29
圖3.11:基礎規模分析:CAPEX vs. Time 32
圖3.12:基礎規模分析:OPEX vs. Time 32
圖3.13:基礎規模分析:TCO vs. Time 32
圖3.14:擴增規模分析:CAPEX vs. Time 34
圖3.15:擴增規模分析:OPEX vs. Time 34
圖3.16:擴增規模分析:TCO vs. Time 34
圖3.17:擴增規模分析:D-RAN, C-RAN, O-RAN 35
圖3.18:OPEX成本動因分析:電源能源消耗 36
圖3.19:OPEX成本動因分析:軟件更新 36
圖3.20:OPEX成本動因分析:運營與維護 36
圖3.21:數據中心成本動因分析:CAPEX 38
圖3.22:數據中心成本動因分析:OPEX 38
圖3.23:數據中心成本動因分析:TCO 38
圖3.24:數據中心成本動因分析:CAPEX 40
圖3.25:數據中心成本動因分析:OPEX 40
圖3.26:數據中心成本動因分析:TCO 40
圖4.1 :競爭者標示地圖分析 48
圖4.2 :O-RU產品CM/ODM與IDM策略對比分析 52
圖4.3 :O-RU IDM轉型策略分析 53
圖4.4 :系統廠IDM產品商業模式九宮格 56
圖4.5 :競爭對手策略對比分析 57
 
表次
表3.1:TCO計算用參數 31
表3.2:基礎規模分析數值(CAPEX, OPEX, TCO) 33
表3.3:擴增規模TCO計算參數變動 33
表3.4:擴增規模分析數值(CAPEX, OPEX, TCO) 35
表3.5:數據中心成本動因分析(BS per DPC) 39
表3.6:數據中心成本動因分析(CU_DU Ratio) 41
表4.1:O-RU產品競爭者分析樣本 42
表4.2:市場共通性分析模型計算使用參數 44
表4.3:市場共通性分析對應表 44
表4.4:資源相似性分析模型計算使用參數 46
表4.5:資源相似性分析對應表 46
表4.6:AMC評估表 49
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subjectIDMzh_TW
dc.subjectO-RANzh_TW
dc.subjectO-RUzh_TW
dc.subjectMC-RS模型zh_TW
dc.subjectTCO模型zh_TW
dc.subject鑽石模型zh_TW
dc.subjectIDMen
dc.subjectTCO Modelen
dc.subjectMC-RS Modelen
dc.subjectDiamond Modelen
dc.subjectO-RANen
dc.subjectO-RUen
dc.titleO-RAN趨勢下新世代電信設備的產品轉型策略以O-RU產品的IDM轉型策略為例zh_TW
dc.titleProduct Transformation Strategy of Next Generation Telco Equipment Under the Trend of O-RAN IDM Transformation Strategy of O-RU Product as an Exampleen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear112-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee黃奎隆;余峻瑜zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeKuei-Long Huang;Jiun-Yu Yuen
dc.subject.keywordTCO模型,MC-RS模型,鑽石模型,O-RAN,O-RU,IDM,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordTCO Model,MC-RS Model,Diamond Model,O-RAN,O-RU,IDM,en
dc.relation.page67-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202401267-
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)-
dc.date.accepted2024-06-24-
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept碩士在職專班商學組-
dc.date.embargo-lift2029-06-12-
顯示於系所單位:商學組

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-112-2.pdf
  未授權公開取用
5.81 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved