Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92815
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor王泰昌zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorTay-Chang Wangen
dc.contributor.author蔡睿恆zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorRuei-Heng Tsaien
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-02T16:06:41Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-03-
dc.date.copyright2024-07-02-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.date.submitted2024-06-17-
dc.identifier.citation余駿展、謝安軒與黃華瑋,2022,異常審計公費與實際及認知審計品質關聯之研究: 臺灣的近期證據,會計審計論叢 12,頁39-86。
李建然、陳信吉與黃皪瑩,2019,集團間責任分擔式查核報告與財務報表重編之關聯性,證券市場發展季刊 31,頁125-157。
李建然與高惠松,2007,會計師事務所人力資本與審計品質之關聯性研究,人力資源管理學報 7,頁45-64。
沈文華,2009,會計師簽證客戶產業多樣性與審計品質關係之研究,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
周玲臺、王雅芳與林家駿,2017,財務報表重編與審計公費,會計評論 65,頁83-116。
官月緞與郭子建,2011,客戶重要性, 非審計服務與會計師任期對審計品質之影響,當代會計 12,頁1-30。
姜家訓與楊雅雯,2005,會計師事務所之產業專精及查核年資與盈餘品質之關係,當代會計 6,頁 23-60。
曹壽民、李家綺與呂學典,2021,內部控制與裁決性應計項目之評價,會計評論 73,頁61-100。
郭美珍,2010,會計師個人專業性與財務報表重編之關聯性研究,國立臺灣大學會計系碩士論文。
陳家慧、劉佩怡與許莘珮,2023,避稅程度與財務報表可讀性:論產業專精會計師之角色,臺大管理論叢 33,頁37-84。
曾怡潔、李啟華與陳宇彤,2014,投資人對會計師之信賴程度對更換會計師與審計品質的影響,會計審計論叢 4,頁59-82。
劉嘉雯與王泰昌,2008,會計師任期與審計品質之關連性研究,管理評論 27,頁1-28。
Aobdia, D., C.-J. Lin, and R. Petacchi. 2015. Capital market consequences of audit partner quality. The Accounting Review, 90(6), 2143-2176.
Ashbaugh, H., R. LaFond, and B. W. Mayhew. 2003. Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 611-639.
Balsam, S., J. Krishnan, and J. S. Yang. 2003. Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), 71-97.
Bartov, E., F. A. Gul, and J. S. Tsui. 2000. Discretionary-accruals models and audit qualifications. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3), 421-452.
Beardsley, E. L., Imdieke, A. J., & Omer, T. C. 2021. The distraction effect of non-audit services on audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 71(2-3), 101380.
Becker, C. L., M. L. DeFond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. Subramanyam. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1-24.
Berglund, N. R., J. D. Eshleman, and P. Guo. 2018. Auditor size and going concern reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(2), 1-25.
Blankley, A. I., D. N. Hurtt, and J. E. MacGregor. 2012. Abnormal audit fees and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(1), 79-96.
Breesch, D., and J. Branson. 2009. The effects of auditor gender on audit quality. The IUP Journal of Accounting Research & Audit Practices, 8(3-4), 78-107.
Chen, C. J., X. Su, and R. Zhao. 2000. An emerging market''s reaction to initial modified audit opinions: Evidence from the Shanghai Stock Exchange. Contemporary Accounting Research, 17(3), 429-455.
Chen, P. F., S. He, Z. Ma, and D. Stice. 2016. The information role of audit opinions in debt contracting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(1), 121-144.
Chen, S., Krishnan, G. V., Li, W., & Zhang, Y. 2020. Do big 4 auditors enhance audit quality? An analysis of client selection and audit adjustments. Available at SSRN 3577732.
Chi, H.-Y., and C.-L. Chin. 2011. Firm versus partner measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on auditor quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 201-229.
Chin, C. L., and H. Y. Chi. 2009. Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(3), 729-765.
Choi, J.-H., J.-B. Kim, and Y. Zang. 2010. Do abnormally high audit fees impair audit quality? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(2), 115-140.
Cook, K. A., G. R. Huston, and T. C. Omer. 2008. Earnings management through effective tax rates: The effects of tax planning investment and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(2).
DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183-199.
Dechow, P. M., and I. D. Dichev. 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77(s-1), 35-59.
Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70(2), 193-225.
Dechow, P., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. 2010. Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 344-401.
DeFond, M., and J. Zhang. 2014. A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2-3), 275-326.
Dopuch, N., and D. Simunic. 1982. Competition in auditing: An assessment. Fourth Symposium on auditing research, University of Illinois, Urbana, 401-50.
Eshleman, J. D., and P. Guo. 2014. Do Big 4 auditors provide higher audit quality after controlling for the endogenous choice of auditor? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(4), 197-219.
Ferguson, M. J., G. S. Seow, and D. Young. 2004. Nonaudit services and earnings management: UK evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(4), 813-841.
Francis, J. R. 2011. A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 125-152.
Francis, J. R., and M. D. Yu. 2009. Big 4 office size and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1521-1552.
Frankel, R. M., M. F. Johnson, and K. K. Nelson. 2002. The relation between auditors'' fees for nonaudit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 77(s-1), 71-105.
Garcia‐Blandon, J., J. M. Argilés‐Bosch, and D. Ravenda. 2020. Audit firm tenure and audit quality: A cross‐European study. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 31(1), 35-64.
Gaver, J. J., & Utke, S. 2019. Audit quality and specialist tenure. The Accounting Review, 94(3), 113-147.
Geiger, M. A., and D. V. Rama. 2003. Audit fees, nonaudit fees, and auditor reporting on stressed companies. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), 53-69.
Gul, F. A., D. Wu, and Z. Yang. 2013. Do individual auditors affect audit quality? Evidence from archival data. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 1993-2023.
Hao, J., L. Liu, and Z. Xu. 2018. Narrow diversification, wide diversification, and audit quality, evidence from China. Asian Review of Accounting, 26(2), 248-263.
Hoitash, R., A. Markelevich, and C. A. Barragato. 2007. Auditor fees and audit quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(8), 761-786.
Hribar, P., and D. Craig Nichols. 2007. The use of unsigned earnings quality measures in tests of earnings management. Journal of Accounting Research, 45(5), 1017-1053.
Hung Chan, K., and D. Wu. 2011. Aggregate quasi rents and auditor independence: Evidence from audit firm mergers in China. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), 175-213.
Johnson, P. E., K. Jamal, and R. G. Berryman. 1991. Effects of framing on auditor decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(1), 75-105.
Jones, F. L. 1996. The information content of the auditor''s going concern evaluation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 15(1), 1-27.
Jones, J. J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193-228.
Kinney Jr, W. R., and L. S. McDaniel. 1989. Characteristics of firms correcting previously reported quarterly earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11(1), 71-93.
Kinney Jr, W. R., Z. V. Palmrose, and S. Scholz. 2004. Auditor independence, non‐audit services, and restatements: Was the US government right? Journal of Accounting Research, 42(3), 561-588.
Knechel, W. R., and A. Vanstraelen. 2007. The relationship between auditor tenure and audit quality implied by going concern opinions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 26(1), 113-131.
Knechel, W. R., and D. S. Sharma. 2012. Auditor-provided nonaudit services and audit effectiveness and efficiency: Evidence from pre-and post-SOX audit report lags. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(4), 85-114.
Kothari, S. P., A. J. Leone, and C. E. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163-197.
Krishnan, G. V. 2003. Does Big 6 auditor industry expertise constrain earnings management? Accounting Horizons, 17, 1-16.
Lennox, C. S., and J. Pittman. 2008. Big five audits and accounting fraud. Available at SSRN 1137829.
Lobo, G. J., and Y. Zhao. 2013. Relation between audit effort and financial report misstatements: Evidence from quarterly and annual restatements. The Accounting Review, 88(4), 1385-1412.
Meckling, W. H., and M. C. Jensen. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Menon, K., and D. D. Williams. 2004. Former audit partners and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 1095-1118.
Minutti‐Meza, M. 2013. Does auditor industry specialization improve audit quality? Journal of Accounting Research, 51(4), 779-817.
Owhoso, V. 2002. Mitigating gender-specific superior ethical sensitivity when assessing likelihood of fraud risk. Journal of Managerial Issues, 14(3), 360-374.
Palmrose, Z. V., and S. Scholz. 2004. The circumstances and legal consequences of non‐GAAP reporting: Evidence from restatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(1), 139-180.
Palmrose, Z.-V. 1988. 1987 competitive manuscript co-winner: An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. The Accounting Review, 63(1), 55-73.
Prawitt, D. F., N. Y. Sharp, and D. A. Wood. 2012. Internal audit outsourcing and the risk of misleading or fraudulent financial reporting: Did Sarbanes‐Oxley get it wrong? Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(4), 1109-1136.
Reichelt, K. J., and D. Wang. 2010. National and office‐specific measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(3), 647-686.
Simunic, D. A., and M. T. Stein. 1996. Impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: A review of the economics and the evidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15 (Supplement), 119-134.
Vera‐Mun˜ oz, S. C., J. L. Ho, and C. W. Chow. 2006. Enhancing knowledge sharing in public accounting firms. Accounting Horizons, 20(2), 133-155.
Yoon, Y. J., and U. Whang. 2016. A new measure of inter-industry distance and its application to the US regional growth. KIEP Research Paper Working, Papers, 16-11.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92815-
dc.description.abstract本研究旨在探討會計師查核產業離散度與審計品質之關聯性,並預期查核客戶產業離散度較大之會計師會因產業知識難以轉換及查核工作複雜度的提升,導致審計品質下降。會計師查核產業離散度變數係依行政院公布之「產業關聯統計編製報告」,將會計師查核產業分布狀況以產業間距離之概念計算衡量;而審計品質則係以盈餘品質及財務報表是否重編做為衡量標準。實證結果顯示,當以盈餘品質衡量審計品質時,會計師查核產業離散度在不同計算方法和參照資料下,大多對受查客戶之盈餘品質有顯著負向影響,僅有極少部分之影響未達顯著水準,支持會計師查核產業離散度越大,審計品質越差之假說。而當以財務報表是否重編衡量審計品質時,會計師查核產業離散度僅在以方法二計算時,對受查公司財務報表重編之可能性有顯著正向影響,若以方法一計算時該影響則不顯著,故當以財務報表是否重編衡量審計品質時,僅在以方法二計算下,支持會計師查核產業離散度越大,審計品質越差之假說。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to explore the relationship between auditor industry dispersion and audit quality. It is hypothesized that auditors with a higher dispersion of audit client’s industry will experience a decline in audit quality due to the difficulty in transferring industry-specific knowledge and the increased complexity of audit tasks. The variable of auditor industry dispersion is measured based on the concept of industry distance, calculated according to "The Report on Input-Output Statistics" published by Executive Yuan. Audit quality is measured by earnings quality and whether financial statements are restated. The empirical results show that when measuring audit quality by earnings quality, auditor industry dispersion mostly has a significant negative impact on the earnings quality of audited clients under different calculation methods and reference data, with only a few instances where the impact was not significant. This supports the hypothesis that greater auditor industry dispersion leads to lower audit quality. Additionally, when measuring audit quality by whether financial statements are restated, auditor industry dispersion only significantly positively impacts the likelihood of financial statement restatements when calculated using Method 2; this impact is not significant when using Method 1. Therefore, when measuring audit quality by whether financial statements are restated, the hypothesis that greater auditor industry dispersion leads to lower audit quality is only supported when using Method 2 for calculation.en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-07-02T16:06:41Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-07-02T16:06:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents謝辭 i
摘要 ii
ABSTRACT iii
目次 iv
表次 vi
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機及貢獻 1
第二節 研究架構 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 審計品質相關文獻 4
第二節 會計師或事務所對審計品質之影響因素相關文獻 7
第三章 研究設計 12
第一節 研究假說 12
第二節 主要測試變數:會計師查核產業離散度之衡量 14
第三節 應變數:審計品質之衡量 19
第四節 控制變數之選取 24
第五節 實證模型 28
第六節 樣本篩選與資料來源 32
第四章 實證結果與分析 41
第一節 敘述性統計 41
第二節 單變量分析 45
第三節 迴歸結果分析 53
第五章 結論與建議 66
第一節 研究結論 66
第二節 研究限制 68
第三節 研究建議 69
參考文獻 70
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject盈餘品質zh_TW
dc.subject審計品質zh_TW
dc.subject會計師查核產業離散度zh_TW
dc.subject財務報表重編zh_TW
dc.subjectAudit qualityen
dc.subjectAuditor industry dispersionen
dc.subjectEarnings qualityen
dc.subjectRestatementen
dc.title會計師查核產業離散度與審計品質之關聯性研究zh_TW
dc.titleThe Relationship between Auditor Industry Dispersion and Audit Qualityen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear112-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee劉嘉雯;林瑞青zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeChia-Wen Liu;Ruey-Ching Linen
dc.subject.keyword審計品質,盈餘品質,財務報表重編,會計師查核產業離散度,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordAudit quality,Earnings quality,Restatement,Auditor industry dispersion,en
dc.relation.page76-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202401160-
dc.rights.note未授權-
dc.date.accepted2024-06-17-
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept會計學系-
顯示於系所單位:會計學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-112-2.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.76 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved