請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92796
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳思帆 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Szu-Fan Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 賴亭毓 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Ting-Yu Lai | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-01T16:08:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-02 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2024-07-01 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2024-06-15 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Ahmed, A. S., Billings, B. K., Morton, R. M., & Stanford‐Harris, M. (2002). The role of accounting conservatism in mitigating bondholder‐shareholder conflicts over dividend policy and in reducing debt costs. The Accounting Review, 77(4), 867-890.
Ashbaugh, H., LaFond, R., & Mayhew, B. W. (2003). Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 611-639. Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1-24. Carey, P., & Simnett, R. (2006). Audit partner tenure and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 81(3), 653-676. Chen, C. J., Chen, S., & Su, X. (2001). Profitability regulation, earnings management, and modified audit opinions: Evidence from China. Auditing: A journal of practice & Theory, 20(2), 9-30. Chi, H.-Y., & Chin, C.-L. (2011). Firm versus partner measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on auditor quality. Auditing: A journal of practice & Theory, 30(2), 201-229. Dechow, P. M., & Dichev, I. D. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77(s-1), 35-59. DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of accounting and economics, 58(2-3), 275-326. DeFond, M. L., & Jiambalvo, J. (1994). Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of accounting and economics, 17(1-2), 145-176. DeFond, M. L., Wong, T.-J., & Li, S. (1999). The impact of improved auditor independence on audit market concentration in China. Journal of accounting and economics, 28(3), 269-305. Deis Jr, D. R., & Giroux, G. A. (1992). Determinants of audit quality in the public sector. Accounting Review, 462-479. Dopuch, N., Holthausen, R. W., & Leftwich, R. W. (1987). Predicting audit qualifications with financial and market variables. Accounting Review, 431-454. Elshafie, E., & Nyadroh, E. (2014). Are discretionary accruals a good measure of audit quality? Journal of Management Policy & Practice, 15(2). Fogarty, T. J., Helan, J. B., & Knutson, D. L. (1991). The rationality of doing “nothing”: Auditors'' responses to legal liability in an institutionalized environment. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 2(3), 201-226. Francis, J. R., & Krishnan, J. (1999). Accounting accruals and auditor reporting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 16(1), 135-165. Geiger, M. A., & Raghunandan, K. (2002). Auditor tenure and audit reporting failures. Auditing: A journal of practice & Theory, 21(1), 67-78. Jaggi, B., Chin, C.-l., William Lin, H.-w., & Lee, P. (2006). Earnings forecast disclosure regulation and earnings management: evidence from Taiwan IPO firms. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 26, 275-299. King, R. R., & Schwartz, R. (1999). Legal penalties and audit quality: An experimental investigation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 16(4), 685-710. Kinney Jr, W. R., Palmrose, Z. V., & Scholz, S. (2004). Auditor independence, non‐audit services, and restatements: Was the US government right? Journal of Accounting Research, 42(3), 561-588. Krishnan, G. V. (2003). Does Big 6 auditor industry expertise constrain earnings management? Accounting horizons, 17, 1-16. Lee, H. Y., & Mande, V. (2003). The effect of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 on accounting discretion of client managers of big 6 and non‐big 6 auditors. Auditing: A journal of practice & Theory, 22(1), 93-108. Lennox, C., & Li, B. (2012). The consequences of protecting audit partners’ personal assets from the threat of liability. Journal of accounting and economics, 54(2-3), 154-173. Myers, J. N., Myers, L. A., & Omer, T. C. (2003). Exploring the term of the auditor‐client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation? The Accounting Review, 78(3), 779-799. Narayanan, V. (1994). An analysis of auditor liability rules. Journal of Accounting Research, 32, 39-59. Radhakrishnan, S. (1999). Investors'' recovery friction and auditor liability rules. The Accounting Review, 74(2), 225-240. Schwartz, R. (1997). Legal regimes, audit quality and investment. Accounting Review, 385-406. Simunic, D. A., & Stein, M. T. (1996). Impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: A review of the economics and the evidence. Auditing, 15, 119. Sloan, R. G. (1996). Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings? Accounting Review, 289-315. Venkataraman, R., Weber, J. P., & Willenborg, M. (2008). Litigation risk, audit quality, and audit fees: Evidence from initial public offerings. The Accounting Review, 83(5), 1315-1345. Watkins, A. L., Hillison, W., & Morecroft, S. E. (2004). Audit quality: A synthesis of theory and empirical evidence. Journal of accounting literature, 23, 153. Zhang, P., & Thoman, L. (1999). Pre‐trial settlement and the value of audits. The Accounting Review, 74(4), 473-491. Zmijewski, M. E. (1984). Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research, 59-82. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92796 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨探討會計師法律責任對審計品質的影響,並針對其是否存在非線性關係進行研究。研究中使用三件臺灣法院對會計師責任比例之判決作為研究對象,通過量化審計品質指標,即當期自由裁量應計數(CDA)和出具修正式保留意見(MAO)的機率,來評估不同程度的法律責任對會計師行為和審計品質的影響。研究結果顯示,僅有一案在判決前後的CDA有顯著變化,且考量到CDA的衡量本身有較高的雜訊,故難以此模型結果判別會計師法律責任對審計品質的影響;相反的,使用MAO之結果顯示,不同法律責任的判決對會計師出具MAO的機率產生了顯著影響。具體而言,當法院判決會計師應付之連帶責任低於大約26%之後,會計師會出具更多MAO,但當法律責任超過此數值時,會計師減少出具MAO,即判決會計師負擔過高的法律責任對審計品質產生負面影響。綜合分析結果,推斷法律責任與審計品質並非呈現線性關係,而是存在一個最適區間,超過該區間則可能使對會計師的懲處產生反效果,本研究結果將為監管機關提供有關會計師法律責任的參考指引。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of accountants' legal responsibilities on audit quality and examines whether there exists a non-linear relationship. Three judgments from Taiwanese courts regarding the proportion of auditors' responsibilities are used as the research subjects. The study evaluates the influence of different degrees of legal liability on audit behavior and audit quality through quantifiable audit quality indicators, namely the Current Discretionary Accruals (CDA) and the probability of issuing a modified audit opinion (MAO). The results show that only one case exhibited significant changes in CDA after the ruling. Considering the noise in measuring CDA, it is challenging to determine the correlation between accountants' legal liability and audit quality based on CDA's results. Conversely, the results using MAO demonstrates that judgments on different legal responsibilities significantly affect the probability of accountants issuing MAO. Specifically, when the court assigns joint liability to accountants below approximately 26%, auditors issue more MAO; however, when legal liability exceeds this value, auditors reduce the issuance of MAO, indicating that excessive legal responsibilities negatively impact audit quality. Overall, the analysis suggests that the relationship between legal liability and audit quality is not linear but rather exhibits an optimal range. Beyond this range, the punishment of auditors may have adverse effects. My findings have important regulatory implications for auditor’s legal responsibility. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-07-01T16:08:48Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-07-01T16:08:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 ii
Abstract iii List of Figures v List of Tables vi 1. Introduction 1 2. Literature & Hypotheses development 2 2.1. Higher penalty always increases AQ 4 2.2. Higher penalty may reduce AQ 5 3. Research Design 6 3.1. Case Selection 6 3.2. Sample Selection 7 3.3. Proxies for Audit Quality 9 3.3.1. Estimation of Discretionary Accruals 9 3.3.2. Modified Audit Opinion 9 3.4. Model for Discretionary Accruals Test 10 3.5. Model for Modified Audit Opinion Test 11 3.6. Variables of Interest 12 3.7. Control Variables 13 4. Empirical Results 15 4.1. Distribution of Sample 15 4.2. Descriptive Statistics 17 4.3. Empirical Results 19 4.3.1. Changes in Discretionary Accruals After Court Rulings 19 4.3.2. Changes in Modified Audit Opinion after Court Rulings 21 4.3.3. Supplemental Analysis 27 5. Conclusion and future research 29 6. References 31 7. Appendix 34 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 會計師連帶責任比例與審計品質之線性與非線性關係之分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Linear and Nonlinear Relation between Auditors’ Legal Liability and Audit Quality | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳坤志;謝佳純 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Kun-Chih Chen;Chia-Chun Hsieh | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 審計失敗,會計師法律責任,審計品質, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Audit failure,Auditors' legal responsibilities,Audit quality, | en |
dc.relation.page | 35 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202401179 | - |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2024-06-15 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-2.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.42 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。