請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92728完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林竣達 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Jiun-Da Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林佐穎 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Zuo-Ying Lin | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-17T16:06:33Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-06-18 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-06-17 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-06-14 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文
李欣樺。(2023)。政體類型對於COVID-19防疫成效的影響。問題與研究， 62(3)，43-96。 葉耀元。(2023)。從2020年新冠肺炎疫情探討威權是否比民主具備更優良的防疫效能。問題與研究，62(3)，149-185。 薛健吾。(2023)。重新找回「政治制度」在各國COVID-19防疫表現中的重要性。問題與研究， 62(3)，97-148。 英文 Adams-Prassl, A., Boneva, T., Golin, M., & Rauh, C. (2020). Inequality in the impact of the coronavirus shock: Evidence from real time surveys. Journal of Public economics, 189, 104245. Adsera, A., & Boix, C. (2002). Trade, democracy, and the size of the public sector: The political underpinnings of openness. International Organization, 56(2), 229-262. Allain-Dupré, D., Chatry, I., Michalun, V., & Moisio, A. (2020). The territorial impact of COVID-19: managing the crisis across levels of government. OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19), 10, 1620846020-1909698535. Alon, T., Doepke, M., Olmstead-Rumsey, J., & Tertilt, M. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on gender equality. Retrieved from Altig, D., Baker, S., Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., Bunn, P., Chen, S., . . . Mihaylov, E. (2020). Economic uncertainty before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Public economics, 191, 104274. Altiparmakis, A., Bojar, A., Brouard, S., Foucault, M., Kriesi, H., & Nadeau, R. (2021). Pandemic politics: policy evaluations of government responses to COVID-19. West European Politics, 44(5-6), 1159-1179. Andrew, A., Cattan, S., Costa Dias, M., Farquharson, C., Kraftman, L., Krutikova, S., Phimister, A. and Sevilla, A. (2020). Inequalities in children''s experiences of home learning during the COVID‐19 lockdown in England. Fiscal studies, 41(3), 653-683. Aslan, A., Silvia, S., Nugroho, B. S., Ramli, M., & Rusiadi, R. (2020). Teacher’s leadership teaching strategy supporting student learning during the covid-19 disruption. Nidhomul Haq: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 5(3), 321-333. Bank, W. (2020). The global economic outlook during the COVID-19 pandemic: a changed world. World Bank Feature Story. Bargain, O., & Aminjonov, U. (2020). Trust and compliance to public health policies in times of COVID-19. Journal of Public economics, 192, 104316. Bastagli, F., & Lowe, C. (2021). Social protection response to Covid-19 and beyond: emerging evidence and learning for future crises. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (Vol. 17): sage. Becker, G. S. (1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of labor economics, 3(1, Part 2), S33-S58. Béland, D., Cantillon, B., Hick, R., & Moreira, A. (2021). Social policy in the face of a global pandemic: Policy responses to the COVID‐19 crisis. Social Policy & Administration, 55(2), 249-260. Béland, D., Dinan, S., Rocco, P., & Waddan, A. (2021). Social policy responses to COVID‐19 in Canada and the United States: Explaining policy variations between two liberal welfare state regimes. Social Policy & Administration, 55(2), 280-294. Bergh, A., & Bjørnskov, C. (2011). Historical trust levels predict the current size of the welfare state. Kyklos, 64(1), 1-19. Bjørnskov, C., & Bergh, A. (2013). Trust, Welfare States And Income Equality: What Causes What?. Research Institute of Industrial Economics. Working Paper Series 994. Besser, T. L. (2009). Changes in small town social capital and civic engagement. Journal of rural studies, 25(2), 185-193. Beveridge, W. (1942). Social insurance and allied services (Vol. 942): London HMSO. Bjørnskov, C. (2006). The multiple facets of social capital. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(1), 22-40. Bjørnskov, C. (2007). Determinants of generalized trust: A cross-country comparison. Public choice, 130(1-2), 1-21. Bjørnskov, C. (2008). Social capital and happiness in the United States. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 3, 43-62. Bjørnskov, C., & Svendsen, G. T. (2013). Does social trust determine the size of the welfare state? Evidence using historical identification. Public choice, 157, 269-286. Blaskó, Z., Papadimitriou, E., & Manca, A. R. (2020). How will the COVID-19 crisis affect existing gender divides in Europe? (Vol. 5): Publications Office of the European Union Luxembourg. Blome, A. (2021). Welfare State Recalibration in France and Germany: What Role Do Polarization and Inequalities in People''s Attitudes Toward Social Policies Play? In The Politics of Inequality (Vol. 28, pp. 47-66): Emerald Publishing Limited. Blum, S., & Dobrotić, I. (2021). Childcare-policy responses in the COVID-19 pandemic: unpacking cross-country variation. European Societies, 23(sup1), S545-S563. Blundell, R., Costa Dias, M., Joyce, R., & Xu, X. (2020). COVID‐19 and Inequalities. Fiscal studies, 41(2), 291-319. Boix, C. (2003). Democracy and redistribution: Cambridge University Press. Bonoli, G., & Natali, D. (2012). The politics of the new welfare state: Oxford University Press. Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question (Vol. 18): Sage. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology: University of Chicago press. Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The lancet, 395(10227), 912-920. Cairney, P., & Wellstead, A. (2021). COVID-19: effective policymaking depends on trust in experts, politicians, and the public. Policy Design and Practice, 4(1), 1-14. Camilletti, E., & Nesbitt‐ahmed, Z. (2022). COVID‐19 and a “crisis of care”: A feminist analysis of public policy responses to paid and unpaid care and domestic work. International Labour Review, 161(2), 195-218. Cantillon, B., Seeleib‐Kaiser, M., & Van der Veen, R. (2021). The COVID‐19 crisis and policy responses by continental European welfare states. Social Policy & Administration, 55(2), 326-338. Charron, N., Dijkstra, L., & Lapuente, V. (2015). Mapping the regional divide in Europe: A measure for assessing quality of government in 206 European regions. Social indicators research, 122, 315-346. Charron, N., Lapuente, V., & Rodríguez‐Pose, A. (2023). Uncooperative society, uncooperative politics or both? Trust, polarization, populism and COVID‐19 deaths across European regions. European Journal of Political Research, 62(3), 781-805. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, S95-S120. Collier, D., & Messick, R. E. (1975). Prerequisites versus diffusion: Testing alternative explanations of social security adoption. American political science review, 69(4), 1299-1315. Cook, R., & Grimshaw, D. (2021). A gendered lens on COVID-19 employment and social policies in Europe. European Societies, 23(sup1), S215-S227. Correia, S., Luck, S., & Verner, E. (2022). Pandemics depress the economy, public health interventions do not: Evidence from the 1918 flu. The Journal of Economic History, 82(4), 917-957. Cox, N., Ganong, P., Noel, P., Vavra, J., Wong, A., Farrell, D., Greig , F., Deadman, E. (2020). Initial impacts of the pandemic on consumer behavior: Evidence from linked income, spending, and savings data. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2020(2), 35-82. Cutright, P. (1965). Political structure, economic development, and national social security programs. American journal of sociology, 70(5), 537-550. Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism? European sociological review, 21(4), 311-327. Devine, D., Gaskell, J., Jennings, W., & Stoker, G. (2021). Trust and the coronavirus pandemic: What are the consequences of and for trust? An early review of the literature. Political Studies Review, 19(2), 274-285. DeViney, S. (1983). Characteristics of the state and the expansion of public social expenditures. Comparative Social Research, 6(15), 1-1. Dorlach, T. (2023). Social Policy Responses to Covid-19 in the Global South: Evidence from 36 Countries. Social Policy and Society, 22(1), 94-105. Drahokoupil, J., & Müller, T. (2021). Job retention schemes in Europe: A lifeline during the Covid-19 pandemic. ETUI Research Paper-Working Paper. Edlund, J. (2006). Trust in the capability of the welfare state and general welfare state support: Sweden 1997-2002. Acta Sociologica, 49(4), 395-417. Edlund, J., & Lindh, A. (2013). Institutional trust and welfare state support: on the role of trust in market institutions. Journal of Public Policy, 33(3), 295-317. Eichenbaum, M. S., Rebelo, S., & Trabandt, M. (2021). The macroeconomics of epidemics. The Review of Financial Studies, 34(11), 5149-5187. Eichhorst, W., Marx, P., & Rinne, U. (2020). Manoeuvring through the crisis: Labour market and social policies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Intereconomics, 55, 375-380. Elgar, F. J., Stefaniak, A., & Wohl, M. J. (2020). The trouble with trust: Time-series analysis of social capital, income inequality, and COVID-19 deaths in 84 countries. Social science & medicine, 263, 113365. Elgin, C., Basbug, G., & Yalaman, A. (2020). Economic policy responses to a pandemic: Developing the COVID-19 economic stimulus index. Covid Economics, 1(3), 40-53. Engler, S., Brunner, P., Loviat, R., Abou-Chadi, T., Leemann, L., Glaser, A., & Kübler, D. (2021). Democracy in times of the pandemic: explaining the variation of COVID-19 policies across European democracies. West European Politics, 44(5-6), 1077-1102. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism: Princeton University Press. Esping-Andersen, G. (1993). Changing classes: Stratification and mobility in post-industrial societies: Sage. Ferrera, M. (2005). The boundaries of welfare: European integration and the new spatial politics of solidarity. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Fiszbein, A., & Schady, N. R. (2009). Conditional cash transfers: reducing present and future poverty: World Bank Publications. Flora, P. (1986). Growth to limits: the Western European welfare states since World War II (Vol. 4): Walter de Gruyter. Flora, P., & Heidenheimer, A. J. (1981). The development of welfare states in Europe and America: Transaction Publishers. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom: With the assistance of Rose D. Friedman. University of Chicago Press. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Social capital and the global economy. Foreign Aff., 74, 89. Fukuyama, F. (2020). The pandemic and political order. it takes a state. . Foreign Affairs, 99(4), 26-32. Galasso, V., & Profeta, P. (2007). How does ageing affect the welfare state? European Journal of Political Economy, 23(2), 554-563. García-Sánchez, I.-M., & García-Sánchez, A. (2020). Corporate social responsibility during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 126. Garritzmann, J. L., Neimanns, E., & Busemeyer, M. R. (2023). Public opinion towards welfare state reform: The role of political trust and government satisfaction. European Journal of Political Research, 62(1), 197-220. Gentilini, U., Almenfi, M., & Orton, I. (2020). Social protection and jobs responses to COVID-19: a real-time review of country measures. In: World Bank Group. Gerard, F., Imbert, C., & Orkin, K. (2020). Social protection response to the COVID-19 crisis: options for developing countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36(Supplement_1), S281-S296. Goldthorpe, J. H. (1969). The affluent worker in the class structure (Vol. 3): CUP Archive. Gough, I. (1979). The political economy of the welfare state: Palgrave Macmillan. Greer, S. L., Jarman, H., Falkenbach, M., Massard da Fonseca, E., Raj, M., & King, E. J. (2021). Social policy as an integral component of pandemic response: Learning from COVID-19 in Brazil, Germany, India and the United States. Global Public Health, 16(8-9), 1209-1222. Greer, S. L., King, E. J., da Fonseca, E. M., & Peralta-Santos, A. (2020). The comparative politics of COVID-19: The need to understand government responses. Global Public Health, 15(9), 1413-1416. Greve, B., Blomquist, P., Hvinden, B., & van Gerven, M. (2021). Nordic welfare states—still standing or changed by the COVID‐19 crisis? Social Policy & Administration, 55(2), 295-311. Hage, J., & Hanneman, R. A. (1980). The growth of the welfare state in Britain, France, Germany, and Italy: a comparison of three paradigms. Comparative Social Research, 3, 45-70. Hale, T., Angrist, N., Goldszmidt, R., Kira, B., Petherick, A., Phillips, T., . . . Majumdar, S. (2021). A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker). Nature human behaviour, 5(4), 529-538. Hand, K., Baxter, J., Carroll, M., & Budinski, M. (2020). Families in Australia Survey: life during COVID-19-report no. 1. Helliwell, J. F. (2006). Well‐being, social capital and public policy: what''s new? The economic journal, 116(510), C34-C45. Hewitt, C. (1977). The effect of political democracy and social democracy on equality in industrial societies: A cross-national comparison. American sociological review, 450-464. Hick, R., & Murphy, M. P. (2021). Common shock, different paths? Comparing social policy responses to COVID‐19 in the UK and Ireland. Social Policy & Administration, 55(2), 312-325. Holmberg, S., Rothstein, B., & Nasiritousi, N. (2009). Quality of government: What you get. Annual review of political science, 12, 135-161. Huang, F.-Y., & Lin, J.-D. (2022). Women’s political empowerment and social protection responses to COVID-19. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 32(3), 213-227. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). Response to ‘What do the worldwide governance indicators measure?’. The European Journal of Development Research, 22, 55-58. Kavanagh, M. M., & Singh, R. (2020). Democracy, capacity, and coercion in pandemic response: COVID-19 in comparative political perspective. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 45(6), 997-1012. Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B. P., Lochner, K., & Prothrow-Stith, D. (1997). Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. American journal of public health, 87(9), 1491-1498. Kerr, C., Harbison, F. H., Dunlop, J. T., & Myers, C. A. (1960). Industrialism and industrial man. Int''l Lab. Rev., 82, 236. Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The quarterly journal of economics, 112(4), 1251-1288. Knack, S. F. (2000). Social capital and the quality of government: Evidence from the United States (Vol. 2504): World Bank Publications. Korpi, W. (2018). The democratic class struggle (Vol. 22): Routledge. Korpi, W., & Palme, J. (1998). The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: Welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in the Western countries. American sociological review, 661-687. Kumlin, S., & Haugsgjerd, A. (2017). The welfare state and political trust: bringing performance back in. In Handbook on political trust (pp. 285-301): Edward Elgar Publishing. Kumlin, S., & Rothstein, B. (2005). Making and breaking social capital: The impact of welfare-state institutions. Comparative political studies, 38(4), 339-365. Levin, A. T., Cochran, K. B., & Walsh, S. P. (2020). Assessing the age specificity of infection fatality rates for COVID-19: Meta-analysis & public policy implications. medRxiv, 2020-07. Licchetta, M., & Mattozzi, G. (2023). Convergence in GDP per Capita in the Euro Area and the EU at the Time of COVID-19. Intereconomics, 58(1), 43-51. Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy1. American political science review, 53(1), 69-105. Lozano, M., Atkinson, M., & Mou, H. (2023). Democratic accountability in times of crisis: Executive power, fiscal policy and COVID-19. Government and Opposition, 58(1), 39-60. Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class (Vol. 11): Cambridge New York, NY. Martin, F. M., Sánchez, J. M., & Wilkinson, O. (2022). The Economic Impact of COVID-19 around the World. FRB St. Louis Working Paper(2022-30). Meier, V., & Werding, M. (2010). Ageing and the welfare state: securing sustainability. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 26(4), 655-673. Moreira, A., & Hick, R. (2021). COVID‐19, the Great Recession and social policy: Is this time different? Social Policy & Administration, 55(2), 261-279. Nannestad, P. (2008). What have we learned about generalized trust, if anything? Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., 11, 413-436. North, D. C. (1990). A transaction cost theory of politics. Journal of theoretical politics, 2(4), 355-367. Organization, I. L. (2021). World social protection report 2020-22: Social protection at the crossroads – in pursuit of a better future. Retrieved from https://www.social-protection.org/gimi/ShowWiki.action?id=629#stat Pereirinha, J. A. C., & Pereira, E. (2021). Social resilience and welfare systems under COVID-19: A European comparative perspective. Global Social Policy, 21(3), 569-594. Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the welfare state?: Reagan, Thatcher and the politics of retrenchment: Cambridge University Press. Pierson, P. (1996). The new politics of the welfare state. World politics, 48(2), 143-179. Pierson, P. (2001). Post-industrial pressures on the mature welfare states. The new politics of the welfare state, 1, 80-105. Poortinga, W. (2012). Community resilience and health: The role of bonding, bridging, and linking aspects of social capital. Health & place, 18(2), 286-295. Putnam, R. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The american, 4. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community: Simon and schuster. Rapeli, L., & Saikkonen, I. (2020). How will the COVID-19 pandemic affect democracy? Democratic Theory, 7(2), 25-32. Rimlinger, G. V. (1971). Welfare policy and industrialization in Europe, America, and Russia: John Wiley & Sons. Roth, F. (2009). Does too much trust hamper economic growth? Kyklos, 62(1), 103-128. Rothstein, B. (1998). Just institutions matter: The moral and political logic of the universal welfare state: Cambridge university press. Rothstein, B. (2011). The quality of government: Corruption, social trust, and inequality in international perspective: University of Chicago Press. Rothstein, B., Samanni, M., & Teorell, J. (2012). Explaining the welfare state: power resources vs. the Quality of Government. European Political Science Review, 4(1), 1-28. Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2012). Defining and measuring quality of government. Good government: The relevance of political science, 13. Rothstein, B., & Uslaner, E. M. (2005). All for all: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World politics, 58(1), 41-72. Rothstein, B. O., & Teorell, J. A. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, 21(2), 165-190. Rueschemeyer, D., Stephens, E. H., & Stephens, J. D. (1992). Capitalist development and democracy (Vol. 22): Cambridge Polity. Saleh, B. M., Aly, E. M., Hafiz, M., Abdel Gawad, R. M., El Kheir-Mataria, W. A., & Salama, M. (2021). Ethical dimensions of public health actions and policies with special focus on COVID-19. Frontiers in public health, 9, 649918. Sen, A. (1999). Commodities and capabilities. OUP Catalogue. Sibley, C. G., Greaves, L. M., Satherley, N., Wilson, M. S., Overall, N. C., Lee, C. H., . . . Milfont, T. L. (2020). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide lockdown on trust, attitudes toward government, and well-being. American psychologist, 75(5), 618. Skocpol, T. (1992). State formation and social policy in the United States. American Behavioral Scientist, 35(4-5), 559-584. Skocpol, T., & Amenta, E. (1986). States and social policies. Annual Review of sociology, 12(1), 131-157. Stasavage, D. (2020). Democracy, autocracy, and emergency threats: Lessons for COVID-19 from the last thousand years. International Organization, 74(S1), E1-E17. Susskind, D., & Vines, D. (2020). The economics of the COVID-19 pandemic: an assessment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36(Supplement_1), S1-S13. Swanson, R. C., Atun, R., Best, A., Betigeri, A., de Campos, F., Chunharas, S., Collins, T., Currie, G., Jan, S., McCoy, D., Omaswa, F., Sanders, D., Sundararaman, T., & Van Damme, W. (2015). Strengthening health systems in low-income countries by enhancing organizational capacities and improving institutions. Globalization and Health, 11, 1-8. Talevi, D., Socci, V., Carai, M., Carnaghi, G., Faleri, S., Trebbi, E., Di Bernardo, A., Capelli, F., & Pacitti, F. (2020). Mental health outcomes of the CoViD-19 pandemic. Rivista di psichiatria, 55(3), 137-144. Taylor-Gooby, P. (2004). New risks, new welfare: the transformation of the European welfare state: OUP Oxford. Tilly, C. (2007). Democracy: Cambridge University Press. Titmuss, R. M. (1963). The welfare state: images and realities. Social Service Review, 37(1), 1-11. Toshkov, D., Carroll, B., & Yesilkagit, K. (2022). Government capacity, societal trust or party preferences: what accounts for the variety of national policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe? Journal of European Public Policy, 29(7), 1009-1028. Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Available at SSRN 824504. Verick, S., & Islam, I. (2010). The great recession of 2008-2009: causes, consequences and policy responses. Consequences and Policy Responses. Verick, S., Schmidt‐klau, D., & Lee, S. (2022). Is this time really different? How the impact of the COVID‐19 crisis on labour markets contrasts with that of the global financial crisis of 2008–09. International Labour Review, 161(1), 125-148. Wagschal, U. (2022). The influence of democracy, governance and government policies on the COVID‐19 pandemic mortality. European Policy Analysis, 8(2), 231-247. Walker, D. M. (2005). Social Security Reform: Answers to Key Questions: DIANE Publishing. Wilensky, H. L. (1974). The welfare state and equality: Structural and ideological roots of public expenditures (Vol. 140): Univ of California Press. Williamson, J. B., & Weiss, J. W. (1979). Egalitarian political movements, social welfare effort and convergence theory: A cross-national analysis. Comparative Social Research, 2, 289-302. Windham, K., 2023. Robust COVID Relief Bolstered Economy and Reduced Hardship for Millions, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. United States of America. Retrieved from https://policycommons.net/artifacts/3524401/robust-covid-relief-bolstered-economy-and-reduced-hardship-for-millions/4325054/ on 1 May 2024. Winter, I. C. (2000). Towards a theorised understanding of family life and social capital (Vol. 21): Australian Institute of Family Studies Melbourne. World Bank. (2022). Unemployment, total (% of total labor force) (modeled ILO estimate). The World Bank. Retrieved July 14, 2022, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS Yeh, C.-Y., Tsai, P.-Y., & Ku, Y.-W. (2022). Public attitude towards government financial support during the COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 32(4), 229-243. Yeyati, E. L., & Filippini, F. (2021). Social and economic impact of COVID-19. Brookings Institution. Zak, P. J., & Knack, S. (2001). Trust and growth. The economic journal, 111(470), 295-321. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92728 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究深入探討 Covid-19 大流行期間全球各國社會政策回應，特別是政府品 質對疫情下社會保障的影響。在 Covid-19 疫情危機的背景下，本研究目的在於揭 示政府品質在政府應對危機中的作用，並探討政治和經濟背景對政策回應的差異 性，以填補現有文獻的空白。
為了達成這些目標，本研究採用迴歸分析方法，利用國際庫中的資料，深入分析政府品質、社會信任、政治體制和經濟發展等因素與疫情下社會保障之間的關聯。研究發現，高政府品質與積極的社會保障政策支持之間存在顯著聯繫。此外，社會信任、政治體制和經濟發展水平也對疫情下社會保障有重要影響。 本研究的結論強調，在面對全球性危機時，政府品質對於政策制定和執行的有效性具有關鍵作用。雖然本研究僅為一項初步探索，但其結果為未來在相關領域深入研究提供了基礎，尤其是在理解不同政府品質和政治體制下，政府如何有效應對全球性挑戰。本論文希望能為政策制定者和學術界提供有益的參考，並啟發更多關於社會信任與社會政策互動的研究。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study delves into the global social policy responses during the Covid-19 pandemic, with a particular focus on the impact of government quality on social security during the crisis. Against the backdrop of the Covid-19 pandemic, this research aims to uncover the role of government quality in crisis response and explore the variations in policy responses due to political and economic contexts, thereby addressing gaps in existing literature.
To achieve these objectives, this study employs regression analysis using data from international databases to deeply analyze the relationships between government quality, social trust, political systems, economic development, and social security during the pandemic. The findings indicate a significant link between high government quality and proactive social security policies. Additionally, social trust, political systems, and levels of economic development also have important impacts on social security during the pandemic. The conclusions of this study emphasize that in the face of global crises, government quality plays a crucial role in the effectiveness of policy formulation and implementation. Although this study is a preliminary exploration, its results provide a foundation for future in-depth research in the related fields, especially in understanding how governments with different qualities and political systems effectively respond to global challenges. This thesis aims to offer valuable references for policymakers and the academic community, and to inspire more research on the interaction between social trust and social policies. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-06-17T16:06:33Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-06-17T16:06:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 次
口試委員會審定書 I 摘要 II Abstract III 目 次 IV 圖 次 VI 表 次 VII 第一章 緒 論 1 第一節 研究緣起與問題意識 1 第二節 研究目的與主要研究問題 8 第三節 研究貢獻 9 第二章 文獻回顧 10 第一節 疫情下的社會政策 10 第二節 政府品質Quality of Government （QoG） 15 第三節 現代化理論 18 第四節 社會信任 24 第三章 研究設計 27 第一節 研究架構與研究假設 27 第二節 變項之概念界定、操作性定義與測量 28 第三節 研究對象與資料來源 36 第四節 統計方法 40 第四章 實證分析與討論 41 第一節 政府品質與疫情下的社會保障策略 44 第二節 疫情下社會保障之經濟現代化的角色 49 第三節 民主化進程中的疫情下社會保障 51 第四節 疫情下的社會保障與社會信任 58 第五章 結論 60 第一節 主要研究發現 60 第二節 研究限制與後續研究建議 67 參考文獻 72 附錄 83 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | Covid-19 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 危機回應 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 政府品質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會信任 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會保障 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | social trust | en |
| dc.subject | Covid-19 | en |
| dc.subject | crisis response | en |
| dc.subject | government quality | en |
| dc.subject | social security | en |
| dc.title | 疫情下的社會政策危機回應：多變項視角下的政策回應評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Social Policy Responses to the Covid-19 Pandemic: An Evaluation of Policy Responses from a Multivariable Perspective | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 汪書華;葉崇揚 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Julia Shu-Huah WANG;Chung-Yang Yeh | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Covid-19,危機回應,政府品質,社會信任,社會保障, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Covid-19,crisis response,government quality,social trust,social security, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 83 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202401174 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-06-14 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國家發展研究所 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國家發展研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf | 5.35 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。