請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92661完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳思帆 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Szu-Fan Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃彥文 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yen-Wen Huang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-31T16:06:08Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-06-01 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-05-31 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-05-20 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Banks, D. W., and W. R. Kinney. 1982. Loss contingency reports and stock prices: An empirical study. Journal of Accounting Research:240-254.
Barth, M. E., and A. P. Hutton. 2004. Analyst earnings forecast revisions and the pricing of accruals. Review of accounting studies 9:59-96. Bédard, J., C. Brousseau, and A. Vanstraelen. 2019. Investor reaction to auditors' going concern emphasis of matter: Evidence from a natural experiment. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 38 (2):27-55. Bonner, S. E. 2008. Judgment and decision making in accounting. (No Title). Botosan, C. A., and M. S. Harris. 2000. Motivations for a change in disclosure frequency and its consequences: An examination of voluntary quarterly segment disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research 38 (2):329-353. Carcello, J. V., D. R. Hermanson, T. L. Neal, and R. A. Riley Jr. 2002. Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary accounting research 19 (3):365-384. Carson, E. 2009. Industry specialization by global audit firm networks. The Accounting Review 84 (2):355-382. Dechow, P. M., and I. D. Dichev. 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77 (s-1):35-59. Derrien, F., and A. Kecskés. 2013. The real effects of financial shocks: Evidence from exogenous changes in analyst coverage. The Journal of Finance 68 (4):1407-1440. Dickins, D. E., J. L. Higgs, and T. R. Skantz. 2008. Estimating audit fees post-SOX. Current Issues in Auditing 2 (1):A9-A18. Doyle, J. T., W. Ge, and S. McVay. 2007. Accruals quality and internal control over financial reporting. The Accounting Review 82 (5):1141-1170. Dyck, A., A. Morse, and L. Zingales. 2010. Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud? The Journal of Finance 65 (6):2213-2253. Dyck, A., N. Volchkova, and L. Zingales. 2008. The corporate governance role of the media: Evidence from Russia. The Journal of Finance 63 (3):1093-1135. Fan, J. P., and T. J. Wong. 2005. Do external auditors perform a corporate governance role in emerging markets? Evidence from East Asia. Journal of Accounting Research 43 (1):35-72. Francis, J. R., and D. Wang. 2005. Impact of the SEC's public fee disclosure requirement on subsequent period fees and implications for market efficiency. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 24 (s-1):145-160. Gotti, G., S. Han, J. L. Higgs, and T. Kang. 2012. Managerial stock ownership, analyst coverage, and audit fee. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 27 (3):412-437. Gul, F. A., and J. S. Tsui. 2001. Free cash flow, debt monitoring, and audit pricing: Further evidence on the role of director equity ownership. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 20 (2):71-84. Hay, D. C., W. R. Knechel, and N. Wong. 2006. Audit fees: A meta‐analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research 23 (1):141-191. Healy, P. M., and K. G. Palepu. 2001. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of accounting and economics 31 (1-3):405-440. Higgs, J. L., and T. R. Skantz. 2006. Audit and nonaudit fees and the market's reaction to earnings announcements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 25 (1):1-26. Khurana, I. K., and K. Raman. 2004. Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of Big 4 versus non‐Big 4 audits: Evidence from Anglo‐American countries. The Accounting Review 79 (2):473-495. Knechel, W. R., and J. L. Payne. 2001. Additional evidence on audit report lag. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 20 (1):137-146. Knyazeva, D. 2007. Corporate governance, analyst following, and firm behavior. Unpublished manuscript. Krishnan, J., and J. Krishnan. 1997. Litigation risk and auditor resignations. Accounting review:539-560. Lang, M. H., K. V. Lins, and D. P. Miller. 2003. ADRs, analysts, and accuracy: Does cross listing in the United States improve a firm's information environment and increase market value? Journal of Accounting Research 41 (2):317-345. ———. 2004. Concentrated control, analyst following, and valuation: do analysts matter most when investors are protected least? Journal of Accounting Research 42 (3):589-623. Lang, M. H., and R. J. Lundholm. 1996. Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior. Accounting review:467-492. Liu, S., K. T. Wang, and Y. Wu. 2023. Corporate Governance Reforms and Analyst Forecasts: International Evidence. Abacus. Mao, M. Q., and Y. Yu. 2015. Analysts' cash flow forecasts, audit effort, and audit opinions on internal control. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 42 (5-6):635-664. Owens, J., K. K. Saunders, S. Schachner, and T. A. Thornock. 2024. How Management Disclosure and Auditor Disclosure Affect Auditor Liability: The Case of the Going Concern Financial Accounting Standard. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory:1-20. Raghunandan, K., and D. V. Rama. 2006. SOX Section 404 material weakness disclosures and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 25 (1):99-114. Sankaraguruswamy, S., and S. Whisenant. 2009. Pricing initial audit engagements: Empirical evidence following public disclosure of audit fees. SSRN eLibrary. Schipper, K. 1991. Analysts' forecasts. Accounting Horizons 5 (4):105-121. Seetharaman, A., F. A. Gul, and S. G. Lynn. 2002. Litigation risk and audit fees: Evidence from UK firms cross-listed on US markets. Journal of accounting and economics 33 (1):91-115. Simunic, D. A. 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research:161-190. Whisenant, S., S. Sankaraguruswamy, and K. Raghunandan. 2003. Evidence on the joint determination of audit and non‐audit fees. Journal of Accounting Research 41 (4):721-744. Xiang, M., and Y. Zhang. 2023. A Study of Non-Controlling Major Shareholder Exit Threats and Corporate Internal Controls—Research on the regulatory effect of analysts attention. Accounting and Corporate Management 5 (12):113-121. Yu, F. F. 2008. Analyst coverage and earnings management. Journal of financial economics 88 (2):245-271. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92661 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 這項研究調查了分析師覆蓋度是否以及在多大程度上影響審計工作,包括審計費用、審計師對內部控制的意見以及持續經營評估。透過實證分析,我發現了一個細微的關係,即更大的分析師覆蓋度與這些指標的顯著變化相關聯。具體來說,增加的分析師覆蓋度與降低的審計費用相關聯,這表明了一個更健全的資訊環境,減少了審計風險。此外,受到更多分析師關注的公司較不可能收到審計師對內部控制不利的意見,這表明在外部監控下公司治理得到加強。此外,我的研究結果表明,擁有更大分析師覆蓋度的公司在持續經營審計意見上不利意見的可能性較低,這強調了分析師報告透過提高公司資訊透明度和對營運環境的理解,對審計師意見的影響。
這些見解具有學術和實務意義,並強調了金融分析師覆蓋度在企業資訊生態系統中的重要性。監管者、實踐者和市場參與者從認識到金融分析師在提高透明度和治理實踐中的關鍵作用中受益。此外,審計公司及其客戶可以利用外部資訊來源,如金融分析師報告,來改善審計計劃和風險評估過程。對於審計師而言,整合來自金融分析師的洞見有助於建立審計費用和評估風險,而被審計方可以策略性地利用分析師覆蓋度來增強資訊對稱性和內部控制,從而影響審計成本。總體而言,這項研究強調了分析師涵蓋度對審計動態的多方面影響,並強調了其在當代審計實踐中的相關性。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study investigates whether and to what extent analyst coverage affect audit work, including audit fees, auditor’s opinion on internal control, and going concern assessments. Through empirical analysis, I find a nuanced relationship wherein greater analyst coverage correlates with notable changes in these metrics. Specifically, increased analyst coverage is associated with reduced audit fees, suggesting a more robust information environment that mitigates audit risk. Additionally, firms with greater analyst attention are less likely to receive adverse auditor’s opinion on internal controls, indicative of bolstered corporate governance under external monitoring. Moreover, my findings indicate a lower likelihood of adverse auditor opinion on going concern for firms with greater analyst coverage, underscoring the effect of analyst reports on auditor’s opinion through the increasing corporate information transparency and operational context comprehension facilitated by analyst reports.
These insights have both academic and practical implications, emphasizing the significance of financial analyst coverage within the corporate information ecosystem. Regulators, practitioners, and market participants stand to benefit from recognizing the pivotal role played by financial analysts in enhancing transparency and governance practices. Moreover, audit firms and their clients can leverage external information sources, such as financial analyst reports, to refine audit planning and risk assessment processes. For auditors, integrating insights from financial analysts aids in structuring audit fees and evaluating risks, while auditees can strategically utilize analyst coverage to enhance information symmetry and internal controls, thereby influencing audit costs. This research highlights the complex influence of analyst coverage on audit processes, emphasizing its significance in modern auditing practices. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-05-31T16:06:08Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-05-31T16:06:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 國立臺灣大學碩士學位論文口試委員會審定書 #
誌謝 i 中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 表次 v 1. Introduction 1 2. Background and hypothesis development 5 3. Research Design 11 3-1 Model 1 12 3-2 Model 2 13 3-3 Model 3 14 4. Data and sample selection 18 4-1 Data 18 4-2 Summary Statistic 20 5. Empirical results 22 5-1 Tests of Analyst Coverage and Audit Fees 22 5-2 Tests of Analyst Coverage and Internal Control Disclosures: 25 5-3 Tests of Analyst Coverage and Going Concern 29 5-4 Additional Testing in Response to Findings 32 6. Conclusion 35 7. References 37 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 內控缺失 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 繼續經營 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 風險評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 審計費用 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 分析師追蹤 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Audit fees | en |
| dc.subject | Risk assessment | en |
| dc.subject | analyst coverage | en |
| dc.subject | internal controls | en |
| dc.subject | going concern | en |
| dc.title | 分析師是否影響會計師工作程度和審計品質 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Does analyst coverage affect auditor effort and audit quality? | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳坤志;謝佳純 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | KUN-ZHI CHEN;JIA-CHUN XIE | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 審計費用,分析師追蹤,繼續經營,風險評估,內控缺失, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Audit fees,Risk assessment,analyst coverage,internal controls,going concern, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 39 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202400977 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-05-21 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2029-01-20 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 561.38 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
