請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92645
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蘇翊豪 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Yi-Hao Su | en |
dc.contributor.author | 江佳紘 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Chia-Hung CHIANG | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-27T16:07:37Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-28 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2024-05-27 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2024-03-31 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文部分
Lo,2017。〈認真揮汗的球員值得被喝采:世大運宣傳善用社群,荷蘭靠水球隊「爆紅」〉。關鍵評論網網站, https://www.thenewslens.com/article/76704,2017/08/20。 卜正珉,2009。《公眾外交 : 軟性國力,理論與策略》。台北:允晨文化。 大陸委員會,2016。〈陸委會第051號新聞稿〉。陸委會網站,https://www.mac.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=B383123AEADAEE52&sms=2B7F1AE4AC63A181&s=334557A81236EAB4,2016/08/04。 中央社,2016a。〈WHA加註一中原則 陸委會:不智之舉〉。中央社網站,https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/201605070240.aspx,2021/05/07。 中央社,2016b。〈ICAO大會阻止任何國家為台灣發言〉。中央社網站,https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201609300084.aspx,2016/09/30。 中央社,2019。〈無兩岸諒解恐無法受邀WHA 陳時中:WHO失言〉。中央社網站,https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/201903290262.aspx,2019/03/29。 中央社,2020a。〈世衛稱WHA決議驅逐台灣代表 歷史檔案說真相〉。中央社網站,https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/202005100098.aspx,2020/05/10。 中央社,2020b。〈WHO臉書Taiwan can help遭封鎖 網友創意反擊〉。中央社網站,https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/202011125005.aspx,2020/11/12。 中央社,2021。〈蔡總統會見奈良美智 愛貓蔡想想當陪客〉。中央社網站,https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/202103085002.aspx,2021/03/08。 中央社,2022a。〈國際刑警組織拒予台灣觀察員 外交部嚴正表達遺憾不滿〉。中央社網站,https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202210180097.aspx,2022/10/18。 中央社,2022b。〈瑞典議員團擬提案 比照華府使館在台設瑞典之家〉。中央社網站,https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202204140316.aspx,2022/4/14。 中央社,2023。〈譚德塞遊行遇台灣團 跳針回應稱參與WHO與否由會員國決定[影]〉。中央社網站,https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202305210192.aspx,2023/05/21。 公視新聞網,2023。〈【#PLive】20230326 宏都拉斯宣布斷交 外交部記者會〉[影音]。YouTube,https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqkrfLALmq0,2023/03/26。 孔彥蓉,2022。《總統與推特外交 ― 以蔡英文推特運用為例》。台北:政治大學傳播學院在職專班碩士論文。 王更喜,2012。〈試析網絡公共外交的四重屬性〉。《新聞界》,6:51-63。 王更喜,2020。《網絡公共外交》。北京:五洲傳播。 王照坤,2017。〈外交部內組織擬整併 傳出反對聲音〉。中央廣播電台網站,https://www.rti.org.tw/news/view/id/362626,2017/08/14。 外交部,2018。〈我推動參與「國際刑警組織」(INTERPOL)案訴求普獲國際支持,外交部表達誠摯感謝〉。外交部網站, https://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=96&s=74741,2018/11/16。 外交部,2019a。〈國際支持台灣推動參與「國際民航組織」的動能及聲量顯著提升,外交部深感鼓舞,將繼續與交通部民航局等單位共同積極推案〉。外交部網站,https://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=96&s=75011,2019/10/05。 外交部,2019b。〈2019年推動參與「國際刑警組織」獲得空前強勁的國際支持,外交部深感鼓舞並表達誠摯感謝〉。外交部網站, https://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=96&s=90820,2019/12/26。 外交部,2020。〈我推動參與「國際刑警組織」(INTERPOL)案訴求普獲國際支持,外交部表達誠摯感謝〉。外交部網站,https://ws.mofa.gov.tw/001/Upload/OldFile/UserFiles/files/修0429_各國感謝臺灣捐贈防疫物資一覽表_更新.pdf,2018/04/29。 外交部,2021。〈外交部誠摯感謝國際各界對我國推動參與「國際刑警組織」的強勁支持〉。外交部網站,https://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=96&s=96853,2021/11/26。 外交部,2022a。〈外交部就國際社會各界對我國「國際民航組織」推案展現的強勁支持,表達誠摯謝忱〉。外交部網站, https://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_CConten.aspx?n=96&s=98787,2022/10/08。 外交部,2022b。〈外交部誠摯感謝國際各界支持我國推動參與「國際刑警組織」案〉。外交部網站, https://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=96&s=98863,2022/10/22。 外交部,2023。〈我國駐波蘭大使吳尚年赴克拉科夫市參加「烏克蘭孩童照護之家」揭牌儀式,代表台灣民眾傳遞愛心、關懷與溫暖〉。外交部網站, https://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=96&s=115668,2023/10/14。 外交部[@ MOFA_Taiwan],2018a。〈Combating communicable diseases requires coordinated & unified international action.〉[動態貼文]。Twitter,https://twitter.com/MOFA_Taiwan/status/988797874174492674,2018/04/24 。 外交部[@ MOFA_Taiwan],2018b。〈Hello #Twitterverse!〉[動態貼文]。Twitter,https://twitter.com/MOFA_Taiwan/status/985855161741459456,2018/04/16。 外交部[@ MOFA_Taiwan],2020。〈Wow, can’t even utter “Taiwan” in the WHO?〉[動態貼文]。Twitter,https://twitter.com/MOFA_Taiwan/status/1244076656353935361,2020/03/29。 外交部[@外交部 Ministry of Foreign Affairs, ROC(Taiwan)],2021。〈這個黃綠紅要挺〉[動態貼文]。Facebook,https://www.facebook.com/mofa.gov.tw/posts/1211935219331118?ref=embed_post,2021/12/21 。 外交部[@外交部 Ministry of Foreign Affairs, ROC(Taiwan)],2022a。〈IKEA到底要怎麼發音?〉[動態貼文]。Facebook,https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=410875450876552,2022/04/12。 外交部[@外交部 Ministry of Foreign Affairs, ROC(Taiwan)],2022b。〈IKEA到底要怎麼發音?〉[動態貼文]。Facebook,https://www.facebook.com/mofa.gov.tw/videos/410875450876552,2022/04/12。 外交部[@外交部 Ministry of Foreign Affairs, ROC(Taiwan)],2022c。〈以後可以在韓國開車囉~〉[動態貼文]。Facebook,https://www.facebook.com/mofa.gov.tw/photos/a.215639112294072/1248618308996142/,2022/02/18。 自由時報,2020。〈蔡英文親回「歡迎全世界朋友來玩」 英媒記者:總統本人耶〉。自由時報網站,https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/3373152,2020/12/06。 李金銓,2022。《「國際傳播」國際化》。台北:聯經。 李新玉,2019。〈講好中國故事與新時代公共外交〉。收錄於《變革中的世界與新時代公共外交能力建設》,北京:時事。 李懷仁[@ leehuaijen],2018。〈@WHO #TaiwanCanHelp .〉[動態貼文]。Twitter,https://twitter.com/leehuaijen/status/980016474512244736,2018/03/31。 奈良美智[@michinara3],2020。〈@iingwen 多謝你的口罩!〉[動態貼文]。Twitter,https://twitter.com/michinara3/status/1253006070089256960,2020/04/23。 林育全,2022。《疫情危機下的中國數位外交》。台北:臺灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。 林依榕,2020。〈印度吹起「辣台妹」風!蔡英文推特、IG粉絲暴增 「台灣」成現今最熱關鍵字〉。今周刊網站,https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/80392/post/202010150013/,2020/10/15。 林杰安,2021。《社交媒體在公共外交中的作用:外交部在推特上的案例研究》。台北:臺灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。 林碧炤,2013。《國際政治與外交政策》。台北:五南。 阿滴英文,2020。〈An open letter to the World Health Organization (from TAIWAN) 〉[影音]。YouTube,https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpxfdAAD4g4,2020/02/10。 范琪斐的美國時間,2023。〈台灣掀「疑美論」 AIT處長:這是言論自由的精神!ft. AIT處長 孫曉雅 | 斐姨所思【阿姨想知道】 EP58〉[影音]。YouTube,https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUwi5iwC7qg&t=335s,2023/03/23。 徐筱琦,2019。〈台灣軟實力建構策略發展之分析(2008~2018)〉。《東亞研究》,50(2):81-116。 馬英九[@馬英九],2022。〈第75屆世界衛生大會(WHA)將於明天在瑞士日內瓦召開〉[動態貼文]。Facebook,https://www.facebook.com/MaYingjeou/posts/555474915935830/,2022/05/21。 國台辦,2016。〈國台辦:台灣方面不能參與第39屆國際民航大會完全是民進黨當局造成的〉。國台辦網站,http://www.gwytb.gov.cn/wyly/201609/t20160923_11577656.htm,2016/09/23。 梁文興,2017。《邁向新公共外交:策略、社群媒體與評估-兼析台灣的發展》。屏東市:屏東大學。 陳宣懿,2023。〈任內7邦交國斷交!吳釗燮關鍵字現「斷交部長」!學者分析不下台原因是?〉。網路溫度計網站,https://dailyview.tw/popular/detail/20976,2023/03/28。 陳雪飛,2019。〈講中國故事要有受眾意識〉。收錄於陳雪飛主編《變革中的世界與新時代公共外交能力建設》,北京:時事。 彭慧鸞,2000。〈資訊時代國際關係理論與實務之研究〉。《問題與研究》,39(5):1-15。 童振源,2021。〈南向泰啟程,展望僑世界:從駐泰數位外交經驗到全球創新僑務作為〉。《淡江史學》,33:113-125。 黃文志,2020。《跨國境犯罪理論與實踐》。台北:翰盧圖書。 黃奎博,2019。〈我國國際空間的本質、現況與未來〉。收錄於馬英九基金會主編《哪來的芒果乾?:煽動恐懼,倚賴美國,能解決問題?》,台北:時報文化。 裘兆琳,2010。〈我國參與世界衛生組織之策略演變與美國角色分析:一九九七~二○○九〉。《歐美研究》,40(2):431-517。 劉世忠,2010。《歷史的糾結:台美關係的戰略合作與分歧(2000-2008)》。台北:新台灣國策智庫。 劉楊鉞,2014。〈網絡治理外交:概念、趨勢與中國的戰略選擇〉。《廣東外語外貿大學學報》,2:14-17。 蔡英文[@ iingwen],2018。〈I''m grateful #Taiwan''s diplomatic allies are sending letters to @DrTedros requesting Taiwan be invited to the World Health Assembly as an observer.〉[動態貼文]。Twitter,https://twitter.com/iingwen/status/982538866325274624,2018/04/07。 蔡英文[@ iingwen],2020a。〈Today I announced three major areas where #Taiwan will contribute to the global fight against #COVID19〉[動態貼文]。Twitter,https://twitter.com/iingwen/status/1245316355609350146,2020/04/01。 蔡英文[@ iingwen],2020b。〈#COVID19 will not stop until we put a stop to it.〉[動態貼文]。Twitter,https://twitter.com/iingwen/status/1250790251770949632,2020/04/16。 蔡英文[@ iingwen],2020c。〈In our battle against #COVID19, social media reminds us that we’re #StrongerTogether.〉[動態貼文]。Twitter,https://twitter.com/iingwen/status/1251147904292581378,2020/04/17。 蔡英文[@蔡英文Tsai Ing-wen],2018。〈台灣,是世界的台灣,我們會主動出擊。〉[動態貼文]。Facebook,https://www.facebook.com/tsaiingwen/photos/a.10151242056081065/10155157266051065/?type=3,2018/05/26 。 蔡英文[@蔡英文Tsai Ing-wen],2019。〈「台灣共識」各國語言版(持續新增中)〉[動態貼文]。Facebook,https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10155581440096065&type=3&ref=embed_post,2019/01/04。 蔡英文[@蔡英文Tsai Ing-wen],2020。〈各位 #辣台派,你們也有Twitter了嗎?〉[動態貼文]。Facebook,https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=645885126259969&t=26,2020/04/17 。 衛生福利部[@ MOHW_Taiwan],2020。〈The facts regarding Taiwan’s email to alert WHO to possible danger of #COVID19〉[動態貼文]。Twitter,https://twitter.com/MOHW_Taiwan/status/1248915057188024320,2020/04/11。 駐捷克臺北經濟文化辦事處[@Tchaj-wan v Česku],2019。〈❤️❤️❤️布拉格市新任市長Zdeněk Hřib認為〉[動態貼文]。Facebook,https://www.facebook.com/czechintaiwan/photos/a.348109245667863/556601434818642/,2019/01/23。 駐奧克蘭台北經濟文化辦事處[@ Taiwan in Auckland],2020。〈Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said〉[動態貼文]。Facebook,https://www.facebook.com/Taiwaninauckland/posts/505460813454598/?paipv=0&eav=AfaIQXr5MEXSGlI3okt0WcLXA_dWV_2d9IXl3L3rY67hHSOb8zRNlFyDluxZRjwoeEY&_rdr,2020/03/16。 盧業中,2015。〈美國支持台灣參與國際民航組織之研究〉。《歐美研究》,45(3):301-356。 總統府,2019。〈總統:持續和國際社會分享臺灣在開放政府領域的努力和成就 「Taiwan Can Help」〉。總統府網站,https://www.president.gov.tw/News/24604,2019/07/27。 總統府,2023。〈接見土耳其震災臺灣國際搜救隊 總統:展現Taiwan can help精神 讓臺灣成為世界的臺灣〉。總統府網站,https://www.president.gov.tw/News/27332,2023/02/23。 簡恒宇,2020。〈國際民航組織成中國附隨組織 挺台留言帳號全遭ICAO封鎖〉。風傳媒網站,https://www.storm.mg/article/2228181,2020/01/28。 轉角國際,2020。〈#VivaTaiwan?被中國戰狼外交惹火的巴西「台灣萬歲」事件〉。轉角國際網站,https://global.udn.com/global_vision/story/8662/4590651,2020/05/26。 顏瑞宏、傅文成,2022。〈外交新常態?以主題及網絡建模技術探索中共Twitter外交的戰狼溝通策略〉。《資訊社會研究》,43:67-113。 貳、西文部分 Aguirre, D., Manor, I., & Ramos, A. 2018. “The Digitalization of Public Diplomacy: Towards a New Conceptual Framework.” Revista Mexicana de Política Exterior, 113: 7-13. Aouragh, M. 2016. “Hasbara 2.0: Israel’s Public Diplomacy in the Digital Age.” Middle East Critique, 25(3): 1-27. Arsenault, A. 2009. “Public Diplomacy 2.0.” In Toward a New Public Diplomacy, ed. Seib, P. Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 135–153. Bailey, M., Strezhnev, A., & Voeten, E., 2017. “Estimating Dynamic State Preferences from United Nations Voting Data”. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(2): 430 - 456. Barberá, P., & Steinert-Threlkeld, Z.C. 2020. “How to Use Social Media Data for Political Science Research.” In The SAGE Handbook of Research Methods in Political Science and International Relations, ed. Curini, L & Franzese, R. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 404-423. Barberá, P., & Zeitzoff, T. 2018. “The New Public Address System: Why Do World Leaders Adopt Social Media?” International Studies Quarterly, 62(1): 121-130. BCW. 2020. “Twiplomacy Study 2020” in https://www.twiplomacy.com/twiplomacy-study-2020. Latest update 20 July 2020. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. 2012. “The Logic of Connective Action.” Information, Communication & Society, 15(5): 739-768. Benoit, K., 2020. “Text as Data: An Overview” In The SAGE Handbook of Research Methods in Political Science and International Relations, ed. Curini, L & Franzese, R. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 461-497. Bjola, C. 2016. “Getting digital diplomacy right: what quantum theory can teach us about measuring impact.” Global Affairs, 2(3): 345-353. Bjola, C., & Holmes, M. 2015. Digital Diplomacy Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. Bjola, C., & Jiang, L. 2015. “Social Media and Public Diplomacy: A comparative analysis of the digital diplomatic strategies of the EU, US and Japan in China.” In Digital Diplomacy Theory and Practice, ed. Bjola, C. & Holmes, M. London: Routledge, 71-88. Bjola, C., Cassidy, J., & Manor, I. 2019. “Public Diplomacy in the Digital Age.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 14(1-2), 83-101. Bjola, C., Cassidy, J., & Manor, I. 2020. “Digital Public Diplomacy: Business as Usual or a Paradigm Shift?” In Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy, ed. Snow, N. & Cull, N. J. New York: Routledge, 405-412. Burgoyne, M. C. 2020. “Taiwan’s fight for international space”. Hindsight, Insight, Foresight: Thinking About Security in the Indo-Pacific, 317-330. Cancillería Honduras [@ CancilleriaHN]. “COMUNICADO: Honduras Anuncia Ruptura de Relaciones Diplomáticas con Taiwán” Twitter. https://twitter.com/CancilleriaHN/status/1639779225828831232?s=20. Last update 26 March 2023. Chan, C. C., & Chen, C. H. S. 2020. The Taiwan Model of COVID-19 Control and Its Global Implication. Taiwan Strategists, 6: 1-15. Chen, Y.-H., & Fang, C.-T. 2023. “Achieving COVID-19 zero without lockdown, January 2020 to March 2022: The Taiwan model explained.” Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, article in press. Choo, S. M., Lim, E. C. L., Chang, C. T., Li, Y. C., Chang, Y. C., & Syed-Abdul, S. 2022. How #TaiwanCanHelp Reverberates: An Exploratory Analysis of Advocacy Hashtag on Twitter. Social Media and Society, 8(3):1-17. Collins, S. D., DeWitt, J. R., & LeFebvre, R. K. 2019. “Hashtag diplomacy: twitter as a tool for engaging in public diplomacy and promoting US foreign policy.” Place Brand Public Diplomacy, 15: 78–96. Comunello, F., & Anzera, G. 2012. “Will the revolution be tweeted? A conceptual framework for understanding the social media and the Arab Spring.” Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 23(4): 453-470. Cull, N. J. 2020. “Public Diplomacy Before Gullion: The Evolution of a Phrase.” In Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy (2nd ed.), ed. Snow, N., & Cull, N. J. New York: Routledge, 13-17. Curini, L., & Fahey, R. 2020. “Sentiment analysis and social media.” In The SAGE Handbook of Research Methods in Political Science and International Relations, ed. Curini, L & Franzese, R. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 534-551. Dumčiuvienė, A. 2016. “Twiplomacy: the meaning of social media to public diplomacy and foreign policy of Lithuania.” Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review, 35(1): 92-118. Duncombe, C. 2018. “Twitter and the challenges of digital diplomacy.” The SAIS Review of International Affairs, 38(2): 91-100. Duncombe, C. 2019. “Digital Diplomacy: Emotion and Identity in the Public Realm.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 14(1-2): 102-116. Foreign Policy. 2020. “‘Mask Diplomacy’ a Boost for Taiwan” https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/04/13/taiwan-coronavirus-pandemic-mask-soft-power-diplomacy/. Last update in 13 April 2020. Freelon, D., McIlwain, C., & Clark, M. 2018. “Quantifying the power and consequences of social media protest.” New Media & Society, 20(3): 990-1011. Gilboa, E. 2001. “Diplomacy in the media age: Three models of uses and effects.” Diplomacy and Statecraft, 12(2): 1-28. Gilboa, E. 2016. “Digital Diplomacy” In SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy, ed. Constantinou, C. M., Kerr, P., Sharp, P. London: Sage, 540-551. Goldsmith, B., Horiuchi, Y., & Matush, K. 2021. “Does Public Diplomacy Sway Foreign Public Opinion? Identifying the Effect of High-Level Visits.” American Political Science Review, 115(4): 1342-1357. Goldstein, J. S. 1992. “A Conflict-Cooperation Scale for WEIS Events Data.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36(2): 369-385. Green, J. A. 2022. “The Rise of Twiplomacy and the Making of Customary International Law on Social Media.” Chinese Journal of International Law, 21(1): 1-53. Grimmer, J., & Stewart, B. 2013. “Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts.” Political Analysis, 21(3): 267-297. Haman, M., 2020. “The use of Twitter by state leaders and its impact on the public during the COVID-19 pandemic.” Heliyon, 6(11): e05540. Harris, B. 2013. “Diplomacy 2.0: The Future of Social Media in Nation Branding.” Exchange: The Journal of Public Diplomacy, 4(1):17-32. Herington, J., & Lee, K. 2014. “The limits of global health diplomacy: Taiwan''s observer status at the world health assembly.” Globalization and Health. 10(71): 1-9. Hsiao, C. T., Chen, C., Lin, L., & Liu, C. 2023. “A systems view of responding to the COVID‐19 pandemic: A causal loop model for Taiwan’s approach.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 40(1), 194-206. Huang, D. W. F., & Wu, W. C. 2023. “Taking Sides with the US Against China? An Analysis of the Taiwanese Choice.” In China-US Competition, ed. Grano, S. A., Huang, D. W. F. London : Palgrave Macmillan Cham, 275-305. Huang, Z.A. 2022. ““Wolf Warrior” and China’s digital public diplomacy during the COVID-19 crisis.” Place Brand Public Diplomacy, 18: 37-40. Huang, Z.A., & Wang, R. 2020. “‘Panda engagement’ in China’s digital public diplomacy.” Asian Journal of Communication, 30(2): 118-140. Huang, Z.A., & Wang, R. 2021. “Exploring China’s Digitalization of Public Diplomacy on Weibo and Twitter: A Case Study of the U.S.–China Trade War.” International Journal of Communication, 15: 1912–1939. Kastner, S., Wang, G., Pearson, M., Phillips-Alvarez, L., & Yinusa, J. 2022. “Taiwan and the “One-China Principle” in the Age of COVID-19: Assessing the Determinants and Limits of Chinese Influence.” The China Quarterly, 252: 1045-1065. Kreps, S. 2020. Social Media and International Relations (Elements in International Relations). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Le Figaro. 2023. “Taïwan innove en matière de diplomatie non officielle.” https://www.lefigaro.fr/international/taiwan-innove-en-matiere-de-diplomatie-non-officielle-20230329. Last update in 30 March 2023. Le soir. 2023. “Malgré les assauts de Pékin, la visibilité diplomatique de Taïwan a tendance à augmenter.” https://www.lesoir.be/504229/article/2023-03-29/malgre-les-assauts-de-pekin-la-visibilite-diplomatique-de-taiwan-tendance. Last update 29 March 2023. Lindgren, S. 2019. “Movement Mobilization in the Age of Hashtag Activism: Examining the Challenge of Noise, Hate, and Disengagement in the #MeToo Campaign.” Policy & Internet, 11(4): 418-438. Liu, A. K., Ophir, Y., Tsai, S.-A., Walter, D., & Himelboim, I. 2022. “Hashtag activism in a politicized pandemic: Framing the campaign to include Taiwan in the World Health Organization’s efforts to combat COVID-19.” New Media & Society, 0(0): 1-22. Manheim, J. B. 1994. Strategic Public Diplomacy and American Foreign Policy: the Evolution of Influence. New York: Oxford University Press. Manor, I. 2016. “Are We There Yet: Have MFAs Realized the Potential of Digital Diplomacy?” Brill Research Perspectives in Diplomacy and Foreign Policy, 1(2): 1–110. Manor, I., & Pamment, J. 2019. “Towards prestige mobility? Diplomatic prestige and digital diplomacy.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32(2): 93-131. Manor, I. 2019. The Digitalization of Public Diplomacy. London: Palgrave Macmillan Cham. Melissen, J., & de Keulenaar, E.V. 2017. “Critical Digital Diplomacy as a Global Challenge: The South Korean Experience.” Glob Policy, 8: 294-302. Mike Pompeo[@ secpompeo]. 2021. “In August 2020, @SecAzar visited Taiwan to highlight our health cooperation amid the global COVID-19 fight.” Twitter. https://twitter.com/secpompeo/status/1350865474288947201. Last update 18 January 2021. Newland, S. A. 2022. “Paradiplomacy as a response to international isolation: the case of Taiwan.” Pacific Review, (ahead-of-print): 1-29. Nye, J. S. 2019. “Soft Power and Public Diplomacy Revisited.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 14(1-2): 7-20. O’Boyle, J. 2019. “Twitter diplomacy between India and the United States: Agenda-building analysis of tweets during presidential state visits.” Global Media and Communication, 15(1): 121-134. Olubukola, S. A. 2017. “Foreign policy in an era of digital diplomacy.” Cogent Social Sciences (3)1: 1-13. Pisarska, K. 2016. The Domestic Dimension of Public Diplomacy: Evaluating Success Through Civil Engagement. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Potter, E. H. 2021. ““Three Cheers for “Diplomatic Frivolity”: Canadian Public Diplomacy Embraces the Digital World.” In Canada''s Public Diplomacy, ed. Cull, N.J.& Hawes, M.K. Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy. London: Palgrave Macmillan Cham, 55-94. Robertson, J. 2018. “Organizational culture and public diplomacy in the digital sphere: The case of South Korea.” Asia & Pacific Policy Study, 5(3): 672-682. Schafferer, C. 2021. “Foreign Aid, Democracy Promotion, and Taiwan’s Quest for Recognition.” In The Niche Diplomacy of Asian Middle Powers, ed. Howe, B., 57-78. Sevin, E., & Ingenhoff, D. 2018. “Public Diplomacy on Social Media: Analyzing Networks and Content.” International Journal of Communication, 12: 3663-3685. Šimunjak, M., & Caliandro, A. 2019. “Twiplomacy in the age of Donald Trump: Is the diplomatic code changing?” The Information Society, 35(1): 13-25. SleeplessBKK[@SleeplessBKK]. 2020. “หล่อเลย” Twitter. https://twitter.com/sleeplessbkk/status/1245310766556663810. Last update 21 April 2020. Smith, B., & Browne, C.A. 2019. Tools and Weapons: The Promise and the Peril of the Digital Age. London: Penguin Press. Sotiriu, S. 2015. “Digital diplomacy: between promises and reality.” In DIGITAL DIPLOMACY Theory and practice, ed. Bjola, C. & Holmes, M., 33-51. Stuff. 2020. “Coronavirus: New Zealand likely to follow Taiwan in advising cancellation of crowded gatherings”. https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/coronavirus/120294477/coronavirus-new-zealand-likely-to-follow-taiwan-in-advising-cancellation-of-crowded-gatherings?fbclid=IwAR3V4T9kJWgaEzNwtsp017XYscRXJCv7HwXPg287L4uYssh1UFbohxQ3GP8. Last update in 15 March 2020. Sundaram, S. S. 2020. “The Practices of Evaluating Entitlements: Rethinking “Reputation” in International Politics.” International Studies Quarterly, 64(3): 657-668. Surmacz, B. 2016. “New Technologies in Diplomacy.” In New Technologies as a Factor of International Relations, ed. Szkarłat, M. & Mojska, K. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 72-90. Tang, A. 2019. “GovInsider interview for 2019.” In https://talk.pdis.nat.gov.tw/t/govinsider-interview-for-2019/7295. Last update 9 December 2019. The Economist. 2023. “‘Elon Musk’s plans could hinder Twitternomics.” https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2023/08/07/elon-musks-plans-could-hinder-twitternomics. Last update in 7 August 2023. The Washington Post. 2020. “Taiwan beat covid-19 and won friends. At the WHO, it’s still fighting for a seat at the table.” In https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/taiwan-beat-covid-19-and-won-friends-at-the-who-its-still-fighting-for-a-seat-at-the-table/2020/05/15/d924b082-9025-11ea-9322-a29e75effc93_story.html. Last update 15 May 2020. The Washington Post. 2023. “Taiwan’s president meets with McCarthy after warnings from China.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/04/05/tsai-kevin-mccarthy-taiwan/. Last update in 5 April 2023. Tremayne, M. 2013. “Anatomy of Protest in the Digital Era: A Network Analysis ofTwitterand Occupy Wall Street.” Social Movement Studies, 13(1): 110-126. Ursula von der Leyen[@ vonderleyen]. 2020. “The European Union thanks Taiwan for its donation of 5.6 million masks to help fight the #coronavirus.” Twitter. https://twitter.com/vonderleyen/status/1245399247232684034. Last update 2 April 2020. Wang, A., & Rauchfleisch, A. 2022. “Understanding the #MilkTeaAlliance Movement” in Essays on China and U.S. Policy, ed. Myers, L., 581-606. Welch, D. A., & Nye, J. S. 2017. Understanding Global Conflict and Cooperation: An Introduction to Theory and History. Boston: Pearson. Wolfsfeld, G., Segev, E., & Sheafer, T. 2013. “Social media and the Arab Spring: Politics comes first.” The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2): 115-137. Yin, J. D. 2021. “WHO, COVID-19, and Taiwan as the Ghost Island.” Global public health, 16(8-9): 1267–1282. Zappavigna, M. 2021. “Discourse and social media.” In The Bloomsbury Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. Hyland, K., Paltridge, B., Wong, L.L. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 585-613. Zeiger, S., & Gyte, J. 2021. “Prevention of Radicalization on Social Media and the Internet” In Handbook of Terrorism Prevention and Preparedness, ed. Schmid, A.P. The Hague: ICCT Press, 358-395. Ziętek, A. 2016. “New Public Diplomacy as a Consequence of the Information Age.” In New Technologies as a Factor of International Relations, ed. Szkarłat, M., & Mojska, K. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 106-122. 首相官邸[@kantei]. 2018. “【SNS更新】「台湾東部で発生した大きな地震により、亡くなられた方々への御冥福をお祈りするとともに、被害に遭われた皆様に、心からのお見舞いを申し上げます」” Twitter. https://twitter.com/kantei/status/961459977322770432/photo/1. Last update 8 February 2018. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92645 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 國際關係學界通常關注於大國權力競合,導致大多數人對更貼近於你我的數位公眾外交相當陌生,爰此本研究旨在觀察台灣自蔡英文政府執政期間,操作數位公眾外交的過程。本文透過文字探勘方法,探究台灣外交部及其外館透過社群媒體傳遞 #TaiwanCanHelp形象的成效;透過統計分析,檢證經營數位公眾外交對國際社會於世界衛生大會(WHA)、國際刑警組織(INTERPOL)與國際民航組織(ICAO)等場合的挺台行為所產生影響。同時深度訪談兩位實務工作者,了解台灣透過新途徑鏈結國際社會的經驗與展望。
數位公眾外交有其獨特性及重要性。它的對立面是傳統公眾外交。傳統公眾外交以國家為主體,單一線性為傳播方向,旨在創造國家利益與擴大權力;數位公眾外交則納入多元行為者,透過社群平台創造雙向溝通的機會,以相同理念價值為基礎,鏈結夥伴建構合作網絡,促成理解與認同,進而提升己身的形象。數位公眾外交與傳統公眾外交並非互斥,而是互補。 本文發現,台灣透過 #TaiwanCanHelp 的操作,已觸及177個國家或地區,並促使無邦交的理念價值相近國家,透過不同方式支持台灣參與國際組織。往後台灣賡續相關操作時,應注意相關內容需連結在地社群,俾能創造共鳴,穩定推進並深化台灣與各方的關係。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Academia surrounding international relations typically focuses on great power rivalry and leads to a lack of awareness of digital public diplomacy, which is more related to daily life. This thesis aims to observe the process of Taiwan's practice of digital public diplomacy under the Tsai Ing-wen government. Through text mining, this paper explores the effectiveness of Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs and its foreign missions in conveying the image of #TaiwanCanHelp through social media. Through statistical analysis, this thesis seeks to validate the impact of digital public diplomacy on international support for Taiwan at the World Health Assembly (WHA), the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), and the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Meanwhile, in-depth interviews with two practitioners provide insights into Taiwan's experiences and prospects in connecting with the international community through new channels.
Digital public diplomacy is unique and essential. Its counterpart is traditional public diplomacy, which is state-centric with one-way communication, aiming to create national interests and power. Nevertheless, digital public diplomacy incorporates multiple actors, creating a space for two-way communication through social media, linking partners based on shared values, constructing collaborative networks, facilitating mutual understanding, and enhancing one's own image. Digital public diplomacy and traditional public diplomacy are not mutually exclusive but complementary. This thesis finds that Taiwan's use of the #TaiwanCanHelp campaign has reached 177 countries or regions, prompting like-minded democracies among non-ally countries to take actions supporting Taiwan's participation in international organizations. In future endeavors, Taiwan should ensure that content remains connected to local communities to create genuine relations, thereby fostering stable advancement and deepening relationships with various parties. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-05-27T16:07:37Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-05-27T16:07:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 目次 v 圖表目次 vii 第一章 緒論與問題意識 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究問題與貢獻 4 第三節 研究理論與假設 6 第四節 研究設計與方法 13 第五節 章節安排 20 第二章 文獻回顧 23 第一節 外交場域數位化 23 第二節 公眾外交、數位外交與數位公眾外交 25 第三節 國家層級的社群主題標籤行動 32 第四節 小結 34 第三章 #TaiwanCanHelp之發展歷程 36 第一節 台灣參與國際組織之歷程 37 第二節 台灣數位公眾外交之發展 45 第三節 小結 61 第四章 #TaiwanCanHelp之成效分析 64 第一節 #TaiwanCanHelp之社群成效 64 第二節 #TaiwanCanHelp 之實體影響 84 第三節 小結 89 第五章 結論 91 第一節 研究發現總結 92 第二節 政策啟示與未來研究方向 93 參考書目 99 壹、中文部分 99 貳、西文部分 107 附錄一、敘述性統計 116 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | Taiwan Can Help 網路標語能否幫台灣?應用文字探勘分析台灣數位公眾外交的實踐效果 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Can the Online Slogan "Taiwan Can Help" Help Taiwan? Applying Text Mining to Analyze the Effectiveness of Taiwan's Digital Public Diplomacy Practices | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳崇涵;王貿 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chong-Han Wu;Mao Wang | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 數位公眾外交,推特外交,文字探勘,台灣能幫忙,國際參與,#TaiwanCanHelp, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Digital Public Diplomacy,Twiplomacy,Text Mining,Taiwan Can Help,International Engagement,#TaiwanCanHelp, | en |
dc.relation.page | 116 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202400823 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2024-04-01 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 政治學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-2.pdf | 15.49 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。