請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92551完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 熊欣華 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Hsin-Hua Hsiung | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王歆儀 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Wang Hsin-Yi | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-10T16:14:06Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-04-11 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-04-10 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-04-09 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 李俊賢、許惠媚、黃芳銘(2013):〈知覺屈就(高才低就、才非所用)與轉職行為之研究〉。《人力資源管理學報》,13(2),45-72。 [Lee, C. H., Hsu H. M., &Hwang F. M.(2013). Study of perceived overqualification (perceived overeducated and perceived mismatch) and job mobility. Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(2), 45-72.] https://doi.org/10.6147/jhrm.2013.1302.03
辜美惜(2004):〈Swann 自我驗證理論及實證研究簡介〉。《心理科學進展》, 12(3),423-428。[ Gu, M. (2004). A brief introduction of Swann’s Self-Verification Theory and research. Advances in Psychological Science, 12(3), 423-428.] Bakan, D. (1966a). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Rand Mcnally. Bakan, D. (1966b). The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in Western man. Beacon Press. Bauer, T. N., Erdogan, B., Peiró, J. M., & Truxillo, D. M. (2011). Overqualified Employees: Making the Best of a Potentially Bad Situation for Individuals and Organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4(2), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01330.x Becker, T. E., & Martin, S. L. (1995). Trying to look bad at work: methods and motives for managing poor impressions in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 174-199. https://doi.org/10.5465/256732 Blickle, G., Diekmann, C., Schneider, P. B., Kalthöfer, Y., & Summers, J. K. (2012). When modesty wins: Impression management through modesty, political skill, and career success—A two-study investigation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(6), 899–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2011.603900 Bolino, M., Long, D., & Turnley, W. (2016). Impression management in organizations: critical questions, answers, and areas for future research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 377-406. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062337 Bolino, M. C., Kacmar, K. M., Turnley, W. H., & Gilstrap, J. B. (2008). A multi-level review of impression management motives and behaviors. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1080-1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308324325 Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (1999). Measuring impression management in organizations: a scale development based on the jones and pittman taxonomy. Organizational Research Methods, 2(2), 187-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819922005 Bozeman, D. P., & Kacmar, K. M. (1997). A cybernetic model of impression management processes in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(1), 9-30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.2669 Brown, S. P., Cron, W. L., & Slocum Jr, J. W. (1998). Effects of trait competitiveness and perceived intraorganizational competition on salesperson goal setting and performance. Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 88-98. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252289 Brown, S. P., & Peterson, R. A. (1994). The effect of effort on sales performance and job satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 70-80. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252270 Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (1999). Trust and commitment through self-verification. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62(4), 347-366. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695833 Byrne, D. (1997). An overview (and underview) of research and theory within the attraction paradigm. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14(3), 417-431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407597143008 Byrne, D., Baskett, G. D., & Hodges, L. (1971). Behavioral indicators of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1(2), 137-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1971.tb00358.x Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. J Appl Psychol, 87(5), 875-884. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.875 Casciaro, T., & Lobo, M. S. (2005). Competent jerks, lovable fools, and the formation of social networks. Harv Bus Rev, 83(6), 92-99, 149. Chiaburu, D. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2008). Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1082-1103. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1082 Crosby, F. (1984). Relative deprivation in organizational settings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 51-93. de Jong, S. B., Van der Vegt, G. S., & Molleman, E. (2007). The relationships among asymmetry in task dependence, perceived helping behavior, and trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1625-1637. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1625 Deng, H., Guan, Y., Wu, C.-H., Erdogan, B., Bauer, T., & Yao, X. (2018). A relational model of perceived overqualification: The moderating role of interpersonal influence on social acceptance. Journal of Management, 44(8), 3288-3310. Dooley, D., & Prause, J. (2004). The social costs of underemployment: Inadequate employment as disguised unemployment. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499562 Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2009). Perceived overqualification and its outcomes: The moderating role of empowerment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 557-565. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013528 Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2021). Overqualification at Work: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8(1), 259-283. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-055831 Erdogan, B., Karaeminogullari, A., Bauer, T. N., & Ellis, A. M. (2020). Perceived overqualification at work: Implications for extra-role behaviors and advice network centrality. Journal of Management, 46(4), 583-606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318804331 Erdogan, B., Tomás, I., Valls, V., & Gracia, F. J. (2018). Perceived overqualification, relative deprivation, and person-centric outcomes: The moderating role of career centrality. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 107, 233-245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.05.003 Feldman, D. C. (1996). The nature, antecedents and consequences of underemployment. Journal of Management, 22(3), 385-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639602200302 Feldman, D. C., & Maynard, D. C. (2011). A labor economic perspective on overqualification. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4(2), 233-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01331.x Ferris, G. R., Hochwarter, W. A., Douglas, C., Blass, F. R., Kolodinsky, R. W., & Treadway, D. C. (2002). Social influence processes in organizations and human resources systems. In G. R. Ferris & J.J. Martocchio (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 21, pp. 65-127). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(02)21002-6 Ferris, G. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1987). The components of social influence and their importance for human resources research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 5, 103-128. Giesler, R. B., Josephs, R. A., & Swann Jr, W. B. (1996). Self-verification in clinical depression: The desire for negative evaluation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105(3), 358-368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.105.3.358 Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2006). Sources of social support and burnout: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1134-1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1134 Harari, M. B., Manapragada, A., & Viswesvaran, C. (2017). Who thinks they're a big fish in a small pond and why does it matter? A meta-analysis of perceived overqualification. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 28-47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.06.002 Hogan, R., & Roberts, B. W. (2000). A socioanalytic perspective on person–environment interaction. In W. B. Walsh, K. H. Craik,& R. H. Price(Eds.), Person–environment psychology: New directions and perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 1-23). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Hogan, R., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). A socioanalytic model of maturity. Journal of Career Assessment, 12(2), 207-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072703255882 Holoien, D. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2013). Downplaying positive impressions: Compensation between warmth and competence in impression management. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(1), 33-41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.09.001 Horowitz, L. M., Krasnoperova, E. N., Tatar, D. G., Hansen, M. B., Person, E. A., Galvin, K. L., & Nelson, K. L. (2001). The way to console may depend on the goal: experimental studies of social support. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(1), 49-61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1435 Horowitz, L. M., Wilson, K. R., Turan, B., Zolotsev, P., Constantino, M. J., & Henderson, L. (2006). How interpersonal motives clarify the meaning of interpersonal behavior: a revised circumplex model. Pers Soc Psychol Rev, 10(1), 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_4 Hu, J., Erdogan, B., Bauer, T. N., Jiang, K., Liu, S., & Li, Y. (2015). There are lots of big fish in this pond: The role of peer overqualification on task significance, perceived fit, and performance for overqualified employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1228-1238. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000008 Johnson, G. J., & Johnson, W. R. (1996). Perceived overqualification and psychological well-being. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136(4), 435-445. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1996.9714025 Joiner Jr, T. E., Katz, J., & Lew, A. S. (1997). Self-verification and depression among youth psychiatric inpatients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106(4), 608-618. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.106.4.608 Jones, E., & Pittman, T. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In S. J. (Ed.), Psychological Perspectives on the Self (pp. 231-262). Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Kim, J., Park, J., Sohn, Y. W., & Lim, J. I. (2021). Perceived overqualification, boredom, and extra-role behaviors: testing a moderated mediation model. Journal of Career Development, 48(4), 400-414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845319853879 Kim, T.-Y., David, E. M., Chen, T., & Liang, Y. (2023). Authenticity or self-enhancement? Effects of self-presentation and authentic leadership on trust and performance. Journal of Management, 49(3), 944-973. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211063807 Kim, T.-Y., Lin, X., & Kim, S.-P. (2019). Person–organization fit and friendship from coworkers: effects on feeling self-verified and employee outcomes. Group & Organization Management, 44(4), 777-806. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601117726632 KOSTAT. (2023). Supplementary results of the economically active population survey by employment type in august 2023 [Press release]. https://kostat.go.kr/board.es?mid=a10301030100&bid=210&tag=&act=view&list_no=427625&ref_bid=210,211,11109,11113,11814&keyField=T&keyWord=&nPage=1 Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individual's fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x Lai, J. Y. M., Lam, L. W., & Liu, Y. (2010). Do you really need help? A study of employee supplication and job performance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(3), 541-559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-009-9152-5 Leary, M. R. (2010). Affiliation, acceptance, and belonging: The pursuit of interpersonal connection. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 864–897). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002024 Lee, A., Erdogan, B., Tian, A., Willis, S., & Cao, J. (2021). Perceived overqualification and task performance: Reconciling two opposing pathways. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(1), 80-106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12323 Li, C. S., Liao, H., & Han, Y. (2022). I despise but also envy you: A dyadic investigation of perceived overqualification, perceived relative qualification, and knowledge hiding. Personnel Psychology, 75(1), 91-118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12444 Li, S., Liao, S., Sun, F., & Guo, Z. (2019). Does differentiated leadership threaten who I am? Introducing a self-verification perspective to explain the curvilinear effect of differentiated empowering leadership [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01903 Lin, B., Law, K. S., & Zhou, J. (2017). Why is underemployment related to creativity and OCB? A task-crafting explanation of the curvilinear moderated relations. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 156-177. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0470 Liu, S., Luksyte, A., Zhou, L., Shi, J., & Wang, M. (2015). Overqualification and counterproductive work behaviors: Examining a moderated mediation model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(2), 250-271. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1979 Liu, S., & Wang, M. (2012). Perceived Overqualification: A Review and Recommendations for Research and Practice. In P. L. Perrewé, J. R. B. Halbesleben, & C. C. Rosen (Eds.), The Role of the Economic Crisis on Occupational Stress and Well Being (Vol. 10, pp. 1-42). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3555(2012)0000010005 Locke, E. A. (1976). The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1297-1349). Rand McNally. Locke, K. (2018). Agentic and Communal Social Motives. In A. E. Abele(Ed.), Agency and communion in social psychology (pp. 65-78). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203703663-6 Locke, K. D. (2015). Agentic and communal social motives. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(10), 525-538. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12201 Martinez, P. G., Lengnick-Hall, M. L., & Kulkarni, M. (2014). Overqualified? A conceptual model of managers' perceptions of overqualification in selection decisions. Personnel Review, 43(6), 957-974. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-06-2013-0104 Mayer, R. C., & Gavin, M. B. (2005). Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss? Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 874-888. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803928 Maynard, D. C., Joseph, T. A., & Maynard, A. M. (2006). Underemployment, job attitudes, and turnover intentions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 509-536. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.389 Maynard, D. C., & Parfyonova, N. M. (2013). Perceived overqualification and withdrawal behaviours: Examining the roles of job attitudes and work values. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(3), 435-455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12006 Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z Moore, C., Lee, S. Y., Kim, K., & Cable, D. M. (2017). The advantage of being oneself: The role of applicant self-verification in organizational hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(11), 1493-1513. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000223 Pouliakas, K., & Theodossiou, I. (2013). The economics of health snd safety st work: an interdiciplinary review of the theory and policy. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27(1), 167-208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2011.00699.x Purohit, B. (2018). Salesperson performance: role of perceived overqualification and organization type. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 36(1), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-06-2017-0108 Quintini, G. (2011). Over-qualified or under-skilled: A review of existing literature. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 121, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg58j9d7b6d-en. Rose, M. (2005). Do rising levels of qualification alter work ethic, work orientation and organizational commitment for the worse? Evidence from the UK, 1985-2001. Journal of Education and Work, 18(2), 131-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080500085885 Rosenfeld, P., Giacalone, R. A., & Riordan, C. A. (1995). Impression Management in Organizations: Theory, Measurement, Practice. Routledge. Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 629-645. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629 Schlenker, B. R. (2012). Self-presentation. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 542-570). The Guilford Press. Schlenker, B. R., & Leary, M. R. (1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization model. Psychological Bulletin, 92(3), 641. Scott, B. A., & Judge, T. A. (2009). The popularity contest at work: Who wins, why, and what do they receive? Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012951 Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1983). Achievement-related motives and behavior. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 10-74). Freeman. Swann Jr, W. B. (2012). Self-verification theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 23-42). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n27 Swann Jr, W. B., & Buhrmester, M. D. (2012). Self-verification: The search for coherence. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity, 2nd ed. (pp. 405-424). The Guilford Press. Swann, W. B. (1983). Self-verification: bringing social reality into harmony with the self. Social Psychological Perspectives on the Self , 2, 33-66. Swann, W. B. (1992). Seeking "truth," finding despair: Some unhappy consequences of a negative self-concept. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(1), 15-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10767800 Swann, W. B., Bosson, J. K., & Pelham, B. W. (2002). Different partners, different selves: strategic verification of circumscribed identities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(9), 1215-1228. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672022812007 Swann, W. B., Pelham, B. W., & Chidester, T. R. (1988). Change through paradox: Using self-verification to alter beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 268-273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.268 Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Accountability and complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 74-83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.74 Vaisey, S. (2006). Education and its discontents: overqualification in America, 1972–2002. Social Forces, 85(2), 835-864. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2007.0028 Viswesvaran, C., Sanchez, J. I., & Fisher, J. (1999). The role of social support in the process of work stress: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54(2), 314-334. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1998.1661 Wayne, S. J., & Ferris, G. R. (1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 487-499. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.487 Wiggins, J. S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In D. Cicchetti & W. M. Grove (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology: Essays in honor of Paul E. Meehl, Vol. 1: Matters of public interest; Vol. 2: Personality and psychopathology. (pp. 89-113). University of Minnesota Press. Wu, C.-H., Tian, A. W., Luksyte, A., & Spitzmueller, C. (2017). On the association between perceived overqualification and adaptive behavior. Personnel Review, 46(2), 339-354. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-05-2015-0134 Xu, E., Huang, X., & Robinson, S. L. (2017). When self-view is at stake: responses to ostracism through the lens of self-verification theory. Journal of Management, 43(7), 2281-2302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314567779 Zhang, X., Ma, C., Guo, F., & Li, Z. (2022). Does perceived overqualification cultivate angels or demons? Examining its interpersonal outcomes through pride from an evolutionary psychology perspective. Applied Psychology, 71(1), 243-270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12319 Zhang, Y., Bolino, M. C., & Yin, K. (2022). The interactive effect of perceived overqualification and peer overqualification on peer ostracism and work meaningfulness. Journal of Business Ethics, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-05018-5 Zhu, Y., Long, L., Xu, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Knowledge seeking or sabotage? The effect of coworker relative overqualification on employee reaction from social comparison theory. Journal of Knowledge Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2023-0163 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92551 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在當代組織環境中,圍繞著知覺屈就員工的探討獲得越來越多的重視。本研究探討了職場中知覺屈就員工之自我呈現對組織中的人際互動的重要性。過去相關研究主要集中在組織和領導者的觀點,忽略了知覺屈就員工的自主性,也較少研究探討知覺屈就員工與其同事之間錯綜複雜的互動。上述研究缺口突顯了需要開展相關研究以了解知覺屈就的員工是如何調整其自我呈現並與組織內其他成員互動的重要性。本研究旨在通過兩種與自我呈現有關的理論——自我驗證理論和印象管理理論,了解知覺相對屈就員工的自我呈現選擇以及人際互動,以發展理論架構並填補既有的研究缺口。藉由對此理論架構的驗證,本研究希望探討知覺屈就員工的自我呈現如何影響其與同事的互動,並了解可能影響其自我呈現方式的人格特質,例如:競爭特質。
為了達成上述研究目的,本研究採用兩階段問卷調查蒐集了知覺屈就員工以及其同事之對偶資料。研究參與者在調查中填答他們對知覺屈就、自我呈現和同事互動的想法。透過對調查資料的統計分析,本研究之研究結果支持了自我驗證理論的預測,但不支持印象管理理論之預測。具體而言,本研究發現,當知覺相對屈就的員工真實展示其能力時,其同事更可能信任和接受他們,因此這與自我驗證理論之論點一致。此外,本研究亦發現,競爭特質調節了知覺相對屈就與真實自我提升之間的關係。競爭特質較高的員工會更傾向透過展示真實能力來與同事互動,顯示這些員工在團隊中並不會避免自己出現「鋒芒畢露」的現象。 本研究之發現可帶來多個理論貢獻和實務意涵。首先,本研究豐富了知覺屈就的相關研究,藉由比較自我驗證理論和印象管理理論,我們對知覺屈就員工的自我呈現策略及其對同事互動方式有更多的了解。本研究結果顯示,自我驗證理論比印象管理理論更能有效地解釋知覺屈就員工在組織中自我呈現的偏好。本研究也發現競爭特質,在影響知覺屈就員工自我呈現選擇方面的重要性。這些研究發現為知覺相對屈就的員工提供了在職場中有效呈現自己的實務見解,也為希望優化組織人力資源但關注知覺屈就員工適應問題的組織管理者提供了管理方面的建議。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In contemporary organizational settings, discussions around perceived overqualification employees have garnered increasing attention. This study addresses the importance of understanding the dynamics of overqualified employees' self-presentation in the workplace. Previous studies predominantly focused on the perspectives of organizations and leaders, but overlooked the autonomy of perceived overqualified employees and the viewpoints of their coworkers. Therefore, previous relevant research has not yet delved into the intricate interactions between overqualified employees and their coworkers. This gap highlights the need for research that examines how overqualified employees adjust their self-presentation and interact with other members of the organization. The main objective of this study is to fill this void by comparing the explanatory power of two perspectives about self-presentationself-verification theory and impression management theoryin understanding the interpersonal interactions of overqualified employees. Specifically, this study aims to explore how overqualified employees’ self-presentation influences their interactions with coworkers and to identify the personal trait, such as trait competitiveness, that could influence their selection of self-presentation.
To achieve this objective, this study employed a two-stage survey to collect dyadic data. The participants included both overqualified employees and their coworkers; they were asked to provide perspectives on overqualification, self-presentation, and coworker interactions. Through statistical analysis of the survey data, the results supported the arguments derived from self-verification theory. Specifically, this study found that when overqualified employees authentically presented their capabilities, their coworkers tended to trust and accept them, consistent with the prediction of self-verification theory. Additionally, the results revealed that competitiveness trait moderated the relationship between employees’ perceived relative overqualification and their willingness to demonstrate real capabilities. The higher the level of competitiveness, the greater the inclination to "get ahead" by presenting real capabilities. The theoretical contributions and empirical implications of this study are multifaceted. Firstly, our study contributes to the literature on overqualification by shedding light on the interpersonal dynamics between overqualified employees and their coworkers. By comparing the predictions of self-verification theory and impression management theory, we offer a nuanced understanding of the self-presentation strategies employed by overqualified employees and their influences on lateral interpersonal interactions. Our findings suggest that self-verification theory provides a more effective explanation than impression management theory in understanding the mindsets of overqualified employees and their colleagues. Additionally, our study highlights the importance of individual traits, such as competitiveness, in influencing overqualified employees' self-presentation choices. The findings of this study offer practical insights for overqualified employees on how to effectively present themselves in the workplace, and provide managerial suggestions for organizational managers who seek to optimize human resources but hold concerns about the adjustment problems of overqualified employees. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-04-10T16:14:06Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-04-10T16:14:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 知覺屈就與知覺相對屈就 5 第二節 知覺相對屈就、自我呈現與同事互動 9 第三節 競爭特質的調節效果與調節式中介效果 15 第三章 研究方法 19 第一節 樣本與程序 19 第二節 研究構念衡量 21 第三節 資料分析方法 23 第四節 理論模型與假設驗證 24 第四章 研究結果 26 第一節 信度與效度分析 26 第二節 描述性統計與相關分析 27 第三節 理論模型與假設驗證 27 第四節 補充分析 36 第五章 討論與建議 39 第一節 理論貢獻 39 第二節 實務意涵 42 第三節 研究限制 43 第四節 未來研究方向 44 第五節 結論 46 參考文獻 47 附錄 59 研究構念之衡量量表(第一階段知覺屈就員工問卷) 59 研究構念之衡量量表(第二階段知覺屈就員工問卷) 60 研究構念之衡量量表(第二階段同事問卷) 60 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 知覺屈就 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自我驗證理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 印象管理理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 信任 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會接受 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 競爭特質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | competitiveness trait | en |
| dc.subject | impression management theory | en |
| dc.subject | trust | en |
| dc.subject | social acceptance | en |
| dc.subject | perceived overqualification | en |
| dc.subject | self-verification theory | en |
| dc.title | 鋒芒畢露或和光同塵?知覺屈就員工的自我呈現困境與同事關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Getting Ahead or Getting Along? Perceived Overqualified Employees’ Self-Presentation Dilemma and Coworker Relationship | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 周婉茹;簡忠仁 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Wan-Ju Chou;Chung-Jen Chien | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 知覺屈就,自我驗證理論,印象管理理論,信任,社會接受,競爭特質, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | perceived overqualification,self-verification theory,impression management theory,trust,social acceptance,competitiveness trait, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 61 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202400830 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-04-09 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.24 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
