請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92416完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 傅立成 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Li-Chen Fu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張堯程 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yao-Cheng Chang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-22T16:24:25Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-03-23 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-03-22 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-11-24 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1] E.-Y. Chia, Y.-L. Chen, T.-C. Chien, M.-L. Chiang, L.-C. Fu, J.-S. Lai, and L. Lu, “Velocity field based active-assistive control for upper limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robot,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2020, pp. 1742–1748.
[2] W. Qian, J. Liao, L. Lu, L. Ai, M. Li, X. Xiao, and Z. Guo, “Curer: A lightweight cable-driven compliant upper limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robot,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2022. [3] H. S. Markus, “The global impact of stroke in 2022.” international journal of stroke,” International Journal of Stroke, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 944–945, 2022. [4] H. E. J. Veeger and F. C. T. V. D. Helm., “Shoulder function: the perfect compromise between mobility and stability,” Journal of biomechanics, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 2119–2129, 2007. [5] M. Cirstea and M. F. Levin, “Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke,” Brain, vol. 123, no. 5, pp. 940–953, 2000. [6] J. McCabe, M. Monkiewicz, J. Holcomb, S. Pundik, and J. J. Daly, “Comparison of robotics, functional electrical stimulation, and motor learning methods for treatment of persistent upper extremity dysfunction after stroke: a randomized controlled trial,” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 981–990, 2015. [7] G. Bao, L. Pan, H. Fang, X. Wu, H. Yu, S. Cai, B. Yu, and Y. Wan, “Academic review and perspectives on robotic exoskeletons,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 2294–2304, 2019. [8] R. Wagenaar, O. Meijer, P. Van Wieringen, D. Kuik, G. Hazenberg, J. Lindeboom, F. Wichers, and H. Rijswijk, “The functional recovery of stroke: a comparison between neuro-developmental treatment and the brunnstrom method,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 1990. [9] N. Naghavi, A. Akbarzadeh, S. M. Tahamipour-Z, and I. Kardan, “Assist-asneeded control of a hip exoskeleton based on a novel strength index,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 134, p. 103667, 2020. [10] J. C. Castiblanco, I. F. Mondragon, C. Alvarado-Rojas, and J. D. Colorado, “Assist-as-needed exoskeleton for hand joint rehabilitation based on muscle effort detection,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 13, p. 4372, 2021. [11] F. Nazari, N. Mohajer, D. Nahavandi, A. Khosravi, and S. Nahavandi, “Applied exoskeleton technology: A comprehensive review of physical and cognitive human-robot-interfac,” arXiv e-prints, pp. arXiv–2111, 2021. [12] K. Gui, H. Liu, and D. Zhang, “Toward multimodal human–robot interaction to enhance active participation of users in gait rehabilitation,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 2054–2066, 2017. [13] Y. Zhou, C. Chen, Y. Alshahrani, M. Cheng, G. Xu, M. Li, W. Zhou, L. Wu, B. Kakos, T. Frush et al., “Real-time multiple-channel shoulder emg processing for a rehabilitative upper-limb exoskeleton motion control using ann machine learning,” in 2021 27th International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice (M2VIP). IEEE, 2021, pp. 498–503. [14] S. Kyeong, J. Feng, J. K. Ryu, J. J. Park, K. H. Lee, and J. Kim, “Surface electromyography characteristics for motion intention recognition and implementation issues in lower-limb exoskeletons,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1018–1028, 2022. [15] M. Oghogho, M. Sharifi, M. Vukadin, C. Chin, V. K. Mushahwar, and M. Tavakoli, “Deep reinforcement learning for emg-based control of assistance level in upper-limb exoskeletons,” in 2022 International Symposium on Medical Robotics (ISMR). IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–7. [16] K. Gui, H. Liu, and D. Zhang, “A practical and adaptive method to achieve emg-based torque estimation for a robotic exoskeleton,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 483–494, 2019. [17] C. G. Burgar, P. S. Lum, P. C. Shor, H. M. Van der Loos et al., “Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: The palo alto va/stanford experience,” Journal of rehabilitation research and development, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 663–674,2000. [18] R. Loureiro, F. Amirabdollahian, M. Topping, B. Driessen, and W. Harwin, “Upper limb robot mediated stroke therapy—gentle/s approach,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 15, pp. 35–51, 2003. [19] L. Peng, Z.-G. Hou, L. Peng, and W. Wang, “Design of casia-arm: A novel rehabilitation robot for upper limbs,” in 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2015, pp. 5611–5616. [20] T. Nef and R. Riener, “Armin-design of a novel arm rehabilitation robot,” in 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005. IEEE, 2005, pp. 57–60. [21] Y. Hasegawa and S. Oura, “Exoskeletal meal assistance system (emas ii) for progressive muscle dystrophy patient,” in 2011 IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics. IEEE, 2011, pp. 1–6. [22] W.-M. Lien, H.-Y. Li, H.-Y. Hong, S.-H. Chen, L.-C. Fu, and J.-S. Lai, “Developing a novel bilateral arm training on rehabilitation robot ntuh-ii for neurologic and orthopedic disorder,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). IEEE, 2015, pp. 158–163. [23] J.-L. Ren, Y.-H. Chien, E.-Y. Chia, L.-C. Fu, and J.-S. Lai, “Deep learning based motion prediction for exoskeleton robot control in upper limb rehabilitation,” in 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).IEEE, 2019, pp. 5076–5082. [24] A. Foroutannia, M.-R. Akbarzadeh-T, and A. Akbarzadeh, “A deep learning strategy for emg-based joint position prediction in hip exoskeleton assistive robots,” Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 75, p. 103557, 2022. [25] N. Li, Y. Yang, G. Li, T. Yang, Y. Wang, W. Chen, P. Yu, X. Xue, C. Zhang, W. Wang et al., “Multi-sensor fusion-based mirror adaptive assist-as-needed control strategy of a soft exoskeleton for upper limb rehabilitation,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2022. [26] Y. Zhuang, Y. Leng, J. Zhou, R. Song, L. Li, and S. W. Su, “Voluntary control of an ankle joint exoskeleton by able-bodied individuals and stroke survivors using emg-based admittance control scheme,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 695–705, 2020. [27] D. Ao, R. Song, and J. Gao, “Movement performance of human–robot cooperation control based on emg-driven hill-type and proportional models for an ankle power-assist exoskeleton robot,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1125–1134, 2016. [28] Y. Zhu, Q. Wu, B. Chen, Z. Zhao, and C. Liang, “Physical human-robot interaction control of variable stiffness exoskeleton with semg-based torque estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2023. [29] M. Pang, S. Guo, and Z. Song, “Study on the semg driven upper limb exoskeleton rehabilitation device in bilateral rehabilitation,” Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, vol. 24, no. 4, p. 585, 2012. [30] B. A. De la Cruz-Sánchez, M. Arias-Montiel, and E. Lugo-González, “Emgcontrolled hand exoskeleton for assisted bilateral rehabilitation,” Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 596–614, 2022. [31] C. Rodrigues-Carvalho, M. Fernández-García, D. Pinto-Fernández, C. Sanz-Morere, F. O. Barroso, S. Borromeo, C. Rodríguez-Sánchez, J. C. Moreno, and A. J. Del-Ama, “Benchmarking the effects on human–exoskeleton interaction of trajectory, admittance and emg-triggered exoskeleton movement control,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 2, p. 791, 2023. [32] Y. Yun, S. Dancausse, P. Esmatloo, A. Serrato, C. A. Merring, P. Agarwal,and A. D. Deshpande, “Maestro: An emg-driven assistive hand exoskeleton for spinal cord injury patients,” in 2017 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2017, pp. 2904–2910. [33] B. Brahmi, M. Saad, C. O. Luna, P. S. Archambault, and M. H. Rahman, “Passive and active rehabilitation control of human upper-limb exoskeleton robot with dynamic uncertainties,” Robotica, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 1757–1779, 2018. [34] C. Ochoa Luna, M. Habibur Rahman, M. Saad, P. S. Archambault, and S. Bruce Ferrer, “Admittance-based upper limb robotic active and activeassistive movements,” International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 117, 2015. [35] Y. Ren, H.-S. Park, and L.-Q. Zhang, “Developing a whole-arm exoskeleton robot with hand opening and closing mechanism for upper limb stroke rehabilitation,” in 2009 IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics.IEEE, 2009, pp. 761–765. [36] C.-H. Lin, W.-M. Lien, W.-W. Wang, S.-H. Chen, C.-H. Lo, S.-Y. Lin, L.-C.Fu, and J.-S. Lai, “Ntuh-ii robot arm with dynamic torque gain adjustment method for frozen shoulder rehabilitation,” in 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 2014, pp. 3555–3560. [37] G. De Lee, W.-W. Wang, K.-W. Lee, S.-Y. Lin, L.-C. Fu, J.-S. Lai, W.-S.Chen, and J.-J. Luh, “Arm exoskeleton rehabilitation robot with assistive system for patient after stroke,” in 2012 12th international conference on control, automation and systems. IEEE, 2012, pp. 1943–1948. [38] M. W. Spong and M. Vidyasagar, Robot dynamics and control. John Wiley & Sons, 2008. [39] B. Bona and M. Indri, “Friction compensation in robotics: an overview,” in Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. IEEE, 2005, pp. 4360–4367. [40] H. Olsson, K. J. Åström, C. C. De Wit, M. Gäfvert, and P. Lischinsky, “Friction models and friction compensation,” Eur. J. Control, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 176–195, 1998. [41] L.-K. Liu, T.-C. Chien, Y.-L. Chen, L.-C. Fu, and J.-S. Lai, “Sensorless control with friction and human intention estimation of exoskeleton robot for upperlimb rehabilitation,” in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). IEEE, 2019, pp. 290–296. [42] H. K. Khalil, Nonlinear systems; 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2002, the book can be consulted by contacting: PH-AID: Wallet, Lionel. [Online]. Available: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1173048 [43] N. Hogan, “Impedance control: An approach to manipulation,” in 1984 American control conference. IEEE, 1984, pp. 304–313. [44] F. BETTINELLI, “Design of an adaptive admittance controller in manual guidance collaborative operations,” 2020. [45] A. Lecours, B. Mayer-St-Onge, and C. Gosselin, “Variable admittance control of a four-degree-of-freedom intelligent assist device,” in 2012 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, 2012, pp. 3903–3908. [46] Z. Yang, S. Guo, Y. Liu, H. Hirata, and T. Tamiya, “An intention-based online bilateral training system for upper limb motor rehabilitation,” Microsystem Technologies, vol. 27, pp. 211–222, 2021. [47] M. Besomi, P. W. Hodges, E. A. Clancy, J. Van Dieën, F. Hug, M. Lowery, R. Merletti, K. Søgaard, T. Wrigley, T. Besier et al., “Consensus for experimental design in electromyography (cede) project: Amplitude normalization matrix,” Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 53, p. 102438, 2020. [48] G. J. Tortora and M. Nielsen, Principles of human anatomy. John Wiley & Sons, 2017. [49] A. Beck and M. Teboulle, “A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems,” SIAM journal on imaging sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 183–202, 2009. [50] G. Wood and B. Zhang, “Estimation of the lipschitz constant of a function,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 8, pp. 91–103, 1996. [51] O. Vargas-Lopez, C. A. Perez-Ramirez, M. Valtierra-Rodriguez, J. J. Yanez-Borjas, and J. P. Amezquita-Sanchez, “An explainable machine learning approach based on statistical indexes and svm for stress detection in automobile drivers using electromyographic signals,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 9, p. 3155, 2021. [52] W. Yu, H. Xu, Z. Yuan, and J. Wu, “Learning modality-specific representations with self-supervised multi-task learning for multimodal sentiment analysis,” in Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 35, no. 12, 2021, pp. 10 790–10 797. [53] E. W. Grafarend, Linear and nonlinear models: fixed effects, random effects, and mixed models. de Gruyter, 2006. [54] C. Yang, S. Chang, P. Liang, Z. Li, and C.-Y. Su, “Teleoperated robot writing using emg signals,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation, 2015, pp. 2264–2269. [55] H. J. Asl, T. Narikiyo, and M. Kawanishi, “An assist-as-needed velocity field control scheme for rehabilitation robots,” in 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2018, pp. 3322–3327. [56] P. Y. Li and R. Horowitz, “Passive velocity field control (pvfc). part i. geometry and robustness,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1346–1359, 2001. [57] H. J. Asl and T. Narikiyo, “An assistive control strategy for rehabilitation robots using velocity field and force field,” in 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). IEEE, 2019, pp. 790–795. [58] Y. Guo, H. Wang, Y. Tian, and D. G. Caldwell, “Task performance-based adaptive velocity assist-as-needed control for an upper limb exoskeleton,” Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 73, p. 103474, 2022. [59] F. Meduri, M. Beretta-Piccoli, L. Calanni, V. Segreto, G. Giovanetti, M. Barbero, C. Cescon, and G. D＇Antona, “Inter-gender semg evaluation of central and peripheral fatigue in biceps brachii of young healthy subjects,” PLoS One,vol. 11, no. 12, p. e0168443, 2016. 101 [60] S. Balasubramanian, A. Melendez-Calderon, and A. Roby-Brami, “Burdet er,” On the analysis of movement smoothness. J Journal of neuroengineering, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 112, 2015. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92416 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 上肢運動功能失常是許多中風患者常見的症狀，因為神經的受損容易引起肌肉無力，活動範圍受限等問題。經臨床研究顯示，經由頻繁的復健治療可以有效恢復運動功能。此外，針對不同嚴重程度的患者，如果能透過適合的復健模式，更能使療程具備效果。復健機器人加入療程，治療師的負擔不僅能減少，還能藉由感測器獲得運動的客觀數據，建立更適合病患的復健策略。因此人機互動控制以及具備多種復健模式的機器人有其必要性。
本研究提出一種基於偵測患者運動意圖程度協助調整復健模式的控制策略，並用於上肢復健的外骨骼機器人。首先，透過特徵模型將表面肌電訊號(sEMG)提取出有效的肌肉啟動訊號，並結合所提出的模型得到低噪的運動意圖程度訊號。接著，基於速度場理論建立理想復健速度軌跡，在輔助模式下，評估當前位置誤差與運動意圖給予適當的輔助速度；另外，在主動模式下，則會針對交互扭矩觀測器得到的主動速度來調整復健速度軌跡讓病患能自主進行復健。最後，提出適當的整合方式，能透過動作意圖並能切換適合的復健模式控制方法，使病人提高復健參與度，以及正確完成復健動作。 本研究提出的控制策略，透過四位健康受測者與兩位中風患者做測試，來驗證模式切換的合理性性以及不同模式的控制表現。並透過運動意圖回饋讓使用者能更加願意積極地完成復健動作。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Upper limb impairment is a common symptom in stroke patients, as nerve damage can cause muscle weakness, limited range of motion, and other issues. According to the result of Clinical studies, long-term rehabilitation therapy can effectively restore motor function. In addition, for patients with different severity levels, if suitable rehabilitation modes can be used, the treatment course can be more effective. The introduction of robots into the treatment course can not only reduce the burden of the therapist, but also obtain objective motion data through the sensors on the machine, so as to establish the more suitable rehabilitation strategy for patients. Therefore, human-computer interaction control and robots with multiple rehabilitation modes are necessary.
In this research, we propose a control strategy based on the detection of the patient’s motion intention level to assist in adjusting the rehabilitation mode, which is applied to the upper limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robot. Firstly, effective muscle activation signals are extracted from surface electromyography (sEMG) signals through feature models, and use the proposed model to obtain low noise motor intention level signals. Second, after an ideal rehabilitation velocity trajectory based on the theory of velocity field, our system proposes an autonomous switching mechanism, which can switch the exoskeleton robot from assistive mode to active mode based on the subject's motion level. In assistive mode, the system evaluates the current position error and motion intention to provide appropriate assistive velocity. In active mode, the rehabilitation velocity trajectory will be adjusted based on the active velocity obtained by the interactive torque observer, which allows the patients to take the initiative for completing rehabilitation. By proposing such hybrid control, our system can improve patient engagement in rehabilitation and more appropriately complete rehabilitation actions. The control strategy proposed in this study is verified through experiments with four healthy subjects and two stroke patients. The results prove the rationality of mode switching and validate the performance of autonomous mode switching. In addition, users can be more willing to participate in the rehabilitation exercise regardless of their muscle condition at that time. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-03-22T16:24:25Z
No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-03-22T16:24:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書i
誌謝ii 摘要iii Abstract v Contents vii List of Figures x List of Tables xii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Literature Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2.1 Robotics in Rehabilitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2.2 sEMG based human robot interface control for exoskeleton . . . 4 1.2.3 Multi-mode therapy with Robots . . . . . . . 6 1.3 Contribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1.4 Thesis Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Chapter 2 Preliminary 9 2.1 Upper Limb Rehabilitation Robot NTUH-II . . 9 2.1.1 Hardware Design of NTUH-II . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.1.2 Design for Security Issue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.2 Forward Kinematics and Jacobian Matrix . . 14 2.2.1 Forward Kinematics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.2.2 Jacobian Matrix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16 2.2.3 Angular Velocity and Linear Velocity . . . . . 18 2.2.4 Application to NTUH-II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.2.5 Robot Dynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.3 Interactive Torque Observer and Admittance Model . . . . . . . . 23 2.3.1 Interactive Torque Observer . . . . . . . . . . . .24 2.3.2 Admittance Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 2.4 Surface Electromyography Hardware Sensor and Maximum Voluntary Contraction Signal Collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 2.4.1 Surface Electromyography Acquisition System . . . . . . . . . . 29 2.4.2 Maximum Voluntary Contraction (MVC) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 2.5 Iterative Shrinkage-thresholding Algorithm (ISTA) . . . . . . . . 32 Chapter 3 Active and Assistive Mode control System 34 3.1 System Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34 3.2 Motion Intention-level Detector based on sEMG . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.3 Velocity Field Generator for Desired Rehabilitation Tasks . . . . 42 3.3.1 Rehabilitation Tasks Generation . . . . . . . . 43 3.3.2 Time-decoupled Trajectory . . . . . . . . . . . . .44 3.4 Control Strategy based on Motion Intention-level in Active and Assistive Mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 3.4.1 Velocity Field based on Motion Intention-level . . . . . . . . . . 47 3.4.2 Task Improvement based on Active Ability . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 3.4.3 Switching Strategy between Active and Assistive mode . . . . . 55 3.5 Controller Design and Stability Analysis . . . . 58 3.5.1 Controller Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .58 3.5.2 Stability Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 Chapter 4 Experiment 62 4.1 Experiment Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 4.2 Experiment Result . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 4.2.1 Motion Intention-level Detector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 4.2.2 Active Mode Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 4.2.3 Smoothness of Mode Switching System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 Chapter 5 Conclusion 91 References 93 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 復健外骨骼機器人 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 運動意圖程度偵測 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | NTUH-II | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 多模式復健 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 表面肌電訊號 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | NTUH-II | en |
| dc.subject | surface electromyography | en |
| dc.subject | multi-mode rehabilitation | en |
| dc.subject | rehabilitation exoskeleton robot | en |
| dc.subject | motion intention-level detection | en |
| dc.title | 基於表面肌電訊號量測運動意圖程度智慧主動和輔助控制復健外骨骼機器人 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Motion Intention-level Driven Smart Active and Assistive Control of Exoskeleton Robot for Upper Limb Rehabilitation with sEMG Measurement | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 賴金鑫;林孟廷;顏炳郎;陳政維 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Jin-Shin Lai;Meng-Ting Lin;Ping-Lang Yen;Cheng-Wei Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 表面肌電訊號,多模式復健,復健外骨骼機器人,運動意圖程度偵測,NTUH-II, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | surface electromyography,multi-mode rehabilitation,rehabilitation exoskeleton robot,motion intention-level detection,NTUH-II, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 102 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202304395 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-11-27 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 電機資訊學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 電機工程學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2026-11-17 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 電機工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 9.19 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。