請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92261
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 洪廣冀 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Kuang-Chi Hung | en |
dc.contributor.author | 徐振輔 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Chen-Fu Hsu | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-21T16:19:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-22 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2024-03-21 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2024-02-16 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Allport, G. W. (1979 [1954]) The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
Anguelovski, I., Connolly, J. J., Garcia-Lamarca, M., Cole, H., & Pearsall, H. (2019) New scholarly pathways on green gentrification: What does the urban ‘green turn’ mean and where is it going? Progress in Human Geography, 43(6), 1064-1086. Bakker, K. (2010) The limits of ‘neoliberal natures’: Debating green neoliberalism. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 715-735. Beisel, U., Kelly, A. H., & Tousignant, N. (2013) Knowing insects: Hosts, vectors and companions of science. Science as Culture, 22(1), 1-15. Brand, P. (2007) Green subjection: The politics of neoliberal urban environmental management. International journal of urban and regional research, 31(3), 616-632. Brand, P., & Thomas, M. (2005) Urban environmentalism: Global change and the mediation of local conflict. Routledge. Branham, M. A., & Wenzel, J. W. (2003) The origin of photic behavior and the evolution of sexual communication in fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Cladistics, 19(1), 1-22. Braun, B. (2008) Environmental issues: inventive life. Progress in Human Geography, 32(5), 667-679. Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002) Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism”. Antipode, 34(3), 349-379. Bulbeck, C. (2012) Facing the wild: Ecotourism, conservation and animal encounters. Earthscan. Büscher, B., Sullivan, S., Neves, K., Igoe, J., & Brockington, D. (2012) Towards a synthesized critique of neoliberal biodiversity conservation. Capitalism nature socialism, 23(2), 4-30. Case, J. F. (2004) Flight studies on photic communication by the firefly Photinus pyralis. Integrative and comparative biology, 44(3), 250-258. Castree, N. (2003) Environmental issues: relational ontologies and hybrid politics. Progress in Human Geography, 27(2), 203-211. Castree, N. (2008) Neoliberalising nature: the logics of deregulation and reregulation. Environment and planning A: Economy and Space, 40(1), 131-152. Chakrabarty, D. (2009) The climate of history: Four theses. Critical inquiry, 35(2), 197-222. Cock, R. D., & Matthysen, E. (1999) Aposematism and bioluminescence: experimental evidence from glow-worm larvae (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Evolutionary Ecology, 13, 619-639. Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000) The “Anthropocene”. Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17-18. Darling, J., & Wilson, H. F. (Eds.). (2016) Encountering the city: Urban encounters from Accra to New York. Routledge. Despret, V. (2004) The body we care for: Figures of anthropo-zoo-genesis. Body & society, 10(2-3), 111-134. Dooling, S. (2009) Ecological gentrification: A research agenda exploring justice in the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33, 621-639. Fletcher, R., & Cortes-Vazquez, J. A. (2020) Beyond the green panopticon: New directions in research exploring environmental governmentality. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 3(2), 289-299. Foster, A. (2018) Volunteer environmental stewardship and affective labour in Philadelphia. Conservation and Society, 16(1), 52-63. Gannon, S. (2017) Saving squawk? Animal and human entanglement at the edge of the lagoon. Environmental Education Research, 23(1), 91-110. Gibbs, L. M. (2020) Animal geographies I: Hearing the cry and extending beyond. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 769-777. Gibson, C. (2010) Geographies of tourism:(un) ethical encounters. Progress in Human Geography, 34(4), 521-527. Haraway, D. J. (2008) When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Harvey, D. (1989) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 3-17. Hillman, J. (1988) Going Bugs. Spring 1988, Audiotape. Ingold, T. (2021) Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Routledge. Kirksey, S. E., & Helmreich, S. (2010) The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural anthropology, 25(4), 545-576. Latour, B. (2012) We have never been modern. Harvard University Press. Lewis, S. M. (2016) Silent sparks: the wondrous world of fireflies. Princeton University Press. Lewis, S. M., & Cratsley, C. K. (2008) Flash signal evolution, mate choice, and predation in fireflies. Annual Review of Entomology, 53, 293-321. Lien, M. E. (2015) Becoming salmon: aquaculture and the domestication of a fish. University of California Press. Lloyd, J. E. (1971) Bioluminescent communication in insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 16, 97-122. Lorimer, J. (2006) What about the nematodes? Taxonomic partialities in the scope of UK biodiversity conservation. Social & Cultural Geography, 7(4), 539-558. Lorimer, J. (2007) Nonhuman charisma. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25(5), 911-932. Lorimer, J. (2015) Wildlife in the Anthropocene: conservation after nature. University of Minnesota Press. Mann, C. C. (2011) 1493: Uncovering the new world Columbus created. Vintage. Massey, D. (2005) For Space. London: SAGE McAfee, K. (1999) Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and green developmentalism. Environment and planning D: Society and Space, 17(2), 133-154. McCarthy, J., & Prudham, S. (2004) Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism. Geoforum, 35(3), 275-283. Ming-Luen Jeng, Jennifer Lai, Ping-Shih Yang (2003) Lampyridae: A synopsis of aquatic fireflies with description of a new species (Coleoptera). Water Beetles of China, 3, 539-562. Nast, H. J. (2006) Loving…. whatever: alienation, neoliberalism and pet-love in the twenty-first century. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 5(2), 300-327. Obmascik, M. (2011) The Big Year. Random House. Ohrem, D. (2018) Some Thoughts on (Animal) Encounter. Exploring Animal Encounters: Philosophical, Cultural, and Historical Perspectives, 3-42. Oma, K. A. (2019) First encounters: Domestication as steps of becoming. Animal Encounters: Kontakt, Interaktion und Relationalität, 171-185. Polanyi, K. (1944) The Great Transformation. Rinehart & Company, Inc, New York. Pratt, M. L. (2007 [1992]) Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. London: Routledge. Quastel, N. (2009) Political ecologies of gentrification. Urban Geography, 30, 694-725. Santaoja, M. (2022) Insect Affects: A Study on the Motivations of Amateur Entomologists and Implications for Citizen Science. Science & Technology Studies, 35(1), 58-79. Tsing, A. L. (2015) The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton University Press. Underwood, T. J., Tallamy, D. W., Pesek, J. D. (1997) Bioluminescence in firefly larvae: a test of the aposematic display hypothesis (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Journal of Insect Behavior, 10, 365-370. Valentine, G. (2008) Living with Difference: Reflections on Geographies of Encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32(3), 323-337. White, P. S., & Pickett, S. T. A. (1985) Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics: An Introduction. In The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics (pp. 3-13). Elsevier. Wilson, H. (2017b) On the Paradox of ‘Organised’ Encounter. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 38(6), 606-620. Wilson, H. F. (2017a) On geography and encounter: Bodies, borders, and difference. Progress in Human Geography, 41(4), 451-471. Wilson, H. F. (2019) Animal encounters: A genre of contact. Animal Encounters: Kontakt, Interaktion und Relationalität, 25-41. Woolf, V. (2008) Street Haunting: A London Adventure (1930). Virginia Woolf, Selected Essays, 177-187. 王志弘、李涵茹(2015)。綠色縉紳化?臺北都會區水岸住宅發展初探。社會科學論叢,9(2),31-88。 王志弘、林純秀(2013)。都市自然的治理與轉化:新北市二重疏洪道。台灣社會研究季刊,92,35-71。 王志弘、黃若慈、李涵茹(2014)。臺北都會區水岸意義與功能的轉變。地理學報,74,63-86。 朱耀沂(2005)。台灣昆蟲學史話(1684-1945)。臺北市:玉山社。 江尚書,周素卿,吳幸玲(2010)。都市再發展與新自由主義治理的經驗模式:以台北車站特定專用區之開發為例。都市與計劃,37(2),167 -191。 何健鎔(2001)。新竹縣螢火蟲導覽手冊。南投縣:農委會特有生物研究保育中心。 何健鎔、方華德、張秀姈(2014)。大阿里山秋冬螢生態導覽手冊。南投縣:農委會特有生物研究保育中心。 何健鎔、方華德、楊平世(2014)。黑翅螢幼蟲的飼育裝置(鞘翅目:螢科)。台灣昆蟲,33,281-290。 何健鎔、姜碧惠(2001)。台中縣螢火蟲導覽手冊,臺中縣:臺中縣政府。 何健鎔、姜碧惠(2002a)。螢光水影:水生螢火蟲的保育與復育。南投縣:農委會特有生物研究保育中心。 何健鎔、姜碧惠(2002b)。九二一重建地區螢火蟲生態導覽手冊。南投市:行政院九二一震災災後重建推動委員會。 何健鎔、張秀姈(2006)。諸羅賞螢趣 = Firefly。臺北市:行政院農業委員會林務局。 李宗信(2014)。瑠公大圳。臺北市:玉山社。 李宗鴻、許玉娟(2009)。生態產業新趨勢-以阿里山賞螢產值及發展為例。台灣昆蟲,29,279-292。 周玲勤(2017)。小黑蚊(臺灣鋏蠓)防治技術研發成果之研析與彙整。生科司106年度科技行政自行研究發展計畫成果報告。 周素卿、吳幸玲、江尚書(2009)。後工業化臺北與新自由主義都市政治。中國地理學會會刊,43,15-32。 邱啟新(2015)綠色堡壘:台北新圓環之綠活論述、自然再現與偽公共空間。建築學報,91,99-118。 徐進鈺(2014)。新自由主義與城市治理專輯導言。地理學報,72,1-3。 張文亮(2020)。愛你喔,螢火蟲:都市公園螢火蟲復育記。新北市:字畝文化。 陳仁昭、黃照銘(2003)。桃園縣螢火蟲。屏東縣:國立屏東科技大學植物保護系。 陳盈秀(2012)。城市在漂綠─從台北好好看系列二政策看當代都市自然的社會建構(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。 陳陽發、張榮德、楊平世、王亞男(2014)。溪頭賞螢趣。南投縣:國立台灣大學實驗林管理處。 陳燦榮(1999)。台灣螢火蟲生態導覽。臺北市:田野影像。 陳燦榮(2002)。賞螢趣:台北縣螢火蟲導覽手冊。臺北縣:臺北縣生命關懷協會。 陳燦榮、鄭明倫(2012)。螢在西拉雅 = The fireflies in Siraya National Scenic。臺南市:西拉雅國家風景區管理處。 陳燦榮、鄭明倫(2016)。熠熠洄瀾。花蓮市:行政院農業委員會林務局花蓮林區管理處。 陳耀勳(2002)。加入WTO後臺灣農業之轉型發展。農政與農情,125(362),53-56。 曾裕淇、徐進鈺(2016)。永續發展:一個都市政治生態學的批判性視角。地理學報,82,1-25。 舒國治(2010)。水城臺北。臺北市:皇冠。 黃孫權(2012)。綠色推土機:九零年代的台北的違建、公園、自然房地產與制度化地景。新北市:破周報。 楊平世(1998)。火金姑-螢火蟲。臺北市:中華民國自然生態保育協會。 溫振華(1978)。清代台北盆地經濟社會的演變(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。 鄭明倫、賴郁雯、楊平世(1999)。台灣六座國家公園螢火蟲相概要(鞘翅目:螢科)。台灣昆蟲,19,65-91。 賴胤就(2003)。台灣螢火蟲家族:黑夜的提燈者。臺北縣:多識界圖書文化。 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92261 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 從1990年代以來,隨著自然保育意識及休閒觀光的興起,台灣社會掀起了一波螢火蟲熱潮,各地出現數以百計的賞螢景點和復育區。過程中,專家們漸漸發展出一套包含環境評估、人工培育、棲地營造、活動規劃的螢火蟲復育技術,甚至讓復育本身成了一種新興產業。近年來,最受矚目的案例莫過於台北市的都會公園復育計畫,規劃者成功在高度開發的城市中心讓螢火蟲重現微光。2018年起,台北市政府固定在每年的四、五月間舉辦螢火蟲季,讓無數市民用自己的雙眼驗收復育成果。放在傳統的自然保育敘事中,這或許只是另一個人類成功管理物種的故事,但本研究希望從「管理遭遇」的角度重新理解復育的涵義。透過遭遇作為分析切入點,可以更敏銳地察覺這組關係的暫時性和不可預測性,以及規劃者試圖穩定遭遇所面臨的一系列挑戰。此外,本研究借鑑晚近人文社會領域關於非人能動性的見解,將遭遇視為人與動物共同流變 (becoming) 的過程;再結合目前昆蟲學上的研究成果,嘗試跳脫以人類為中心的敘事慣例,朝向多物種民族誌的書寫實踐。從2021年至2023年的田野工作期間,我以台北市螢火蟲季為核心,以兩個觀光與復育的關鍵物種──水生的黃緣螢 (Aquatica ficta) 以及陸生的黑翅螢 (Abscondita cerata) 為軸線,追蹤牠們在野外棲地、人工養殖場、戶外復育區、政府會議室、網路平台等場所的移動路徑,並以參與觀察與訪談的方式,勾勒出人類、螢火蟲及其他物種之間相互纏繞的多重軌跡。藉此揭示那些看似自然的遭遇背後,實則是經過一系列的審慎編排,才讓螢火蟲發揮出捲動社會的強大魅力。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Since the 1990s, Taiwan has experienced a surge of interest in fireflies due to growing awareness of nature conservation and the popularity of ecotourism. This has resulted in the establishment of numerous firefly-watching sites and conservation areas across the island, totaling in the hundreds. Throughout this process, experts have developed firefly restoration techniques, including environmental assessment, artificial cultivation, habitat creation, and activity planning, turning restoration into a thriving industry. In recent years, the spotlight has focused on Taipei City''s Urban Park Restoration Project, successfully reintroducing fireflies to the highly urbanized city center. Since 2018, the Taipei City government has annually organized the Firefly Season in May and June, allowing citizens to witness the outcomes of conservation efforts. While this narrative may be seen as a success in human-managed species conservation within traditional nature conservation, this research aims to redefine conservation through "encounter management." By adopting encounters as an analytical point, there is increased sensitivity to the temporality and unpredictability in relationships, as well as the challenges planners face in stabilizing encounters. Drawing inspiration from recent insights on nonhuman agency, the study considers encounters as processes of co-becoming between humans and animals, attempting to move beyond anthropocentric narrative conventions toward multispecies ethnography. During the 2021-2023 fieldwork period, focusing on Taipei City''s Firefly Season, the study traces the trajectories of two key species crucial to tourism and conservation: the aquatic Aquatica ficta and the terrestrial Abscondita cerata. Their movements across natural habitats, breeding grounds, restoration areas, government meeting rooms, online platforms, and other locations are observed and interviewed, aiming to delineate intertwined trajectories among humans, fireflies, and other species. This approach reveals that behind seemingly natural encounters are meticulously orchestrated sequences enabling fireflies to unleash a potent charm capable of stirring society. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-03-21T16:19:14Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-03-21T16:19:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 I
摘要 III ABSTRACT IV 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 微光燎原 1 第二節 雙重運動的疊合 4 第三節 馬克思、傅柯及其他可能 7 第四節 破壞與創造的瞬間 9 第五節 在遭遇中流變 12 第六節 田野與方法 16 第七節 章節安排 18 第二章 光的自然史 20 第一節 所有相遇都是意外 21 第二節 黑翅螢:在道路切割之處 23 第三節 黃緣螢:在稻米生長之處 26 第四節 復育的雙線敘事 30 第三章 城市裡的降靈會 34 第一節 螢火蟲進城來了 35 第二節 計算遭遇的可能性 37 第三節 臨機應變的嚮導 41 第四節 召喚歷史的幽靈 44 第五節 靈光消逝之時 47 第四章 人如何成為螢火蟲 53 第一節 跑野外的人 53 第二節 成為螢火蟲 55 第三節 專家的誕生 59 第五章 機械複製時代的靈光 63 第一節 秘密行業 63 第二節 最初的火種 64 第三節 衣櫃裡的工廠 67 第四節 規模化與成本的問題 71 第五節 關於那些不可規模化的 77 第六節 螢火蟲作為一種藝術品 82 第六章 多物種的世界創製 85 第一節 時間凝止之地 85 第二節 成為守護者 88 第三節 維持邊界的秩序 93 第四節 多重網絡的競逐 96 第五節 保護傘下有什麼? 101 第七章 結論 107 參考文獻 111 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 微光燎原:「永續城市」下的螢火蟲自然史 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Spreading Shimmers: A Natural History of Fireflies in a “Sustainable City” | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-1 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔡晏霖;王驥懋;李育霖 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yen-Ling Tsai;Chi-Mao Wang;Yu-Lin Lee | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 螢火蟲,復育,遭遇,非人魅力,多物種民族誌, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | firefly,restoration,encounter,nonhuman charisma,multispecies ethnography, | en |
dc.relation.page | 116 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202400607 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2024-02-17 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 地理環境資源學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 地理環境資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 6.09 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。