Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92185Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 盧道杰 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Dau-Jye Lu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 鍾莉文 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Li-Wen Chung | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-08T16:11:25Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-03-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-03-08 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-02-16 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Alexander, M. (2005). The CMS Management Planning Guide. Conservation Management System Consortium, Talgarth, Wales, UK.
Alexander, M (2008). Management Planning for Nature Conservation: A Theoretical Basis and Practical Guide. Springer, Dordrecht. Alexander, M. (2020). A Guide to Management Planning. Wildlife Trust of South and West Wales, Bridgend Wales, UK. Amend, S., Giraldo, A., Oltremari, J., Sanchez, R., Valarezo., and Yerena, E. (2003). Management Plans - Concepts and Proposal. Parques Nacionals Y Conservation Ambiental No. 11. Panana Andam, K. S., Ferraro, P. J., Pfaff, A., Sanchez-Azofeifa, G. A., and Robalino, J. A. (2008). Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing de-forestation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(42), 16089-16094. Anthony, B.P. (2014). Review of international protected area management effectiveness (PAME) experience. Report prepared for the Association for Wa-ter and Rural Development. Anthony, B. P., and Shestackova, E. (2015). Do Global Indicators of Protected Area Management Effectiveness Make Sense? A Case Study from Siberia. Environmental management, 1-17. Baldwin, R. F., and Beazley, K. F. (2019). Emerging paradigms for biodiversity and protected areas. Land, 8(3), 43. Balmford, A., Bennun, L., Ten Brink, B., Cooper, D., Côté, I. M., Crane, P., ... and Gregory, R. D. (2005). The convention on biological diversity's 2010 tar-get. Science, 307(5707), 212-213. Barnes, M. D., Craigie, I. D., Dudley, N., and Hockings, M. (2017). Understanding local‐scale drivers of biodiversity outcomes in terrestrial protected areas. An-nals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1399(1), 42-60. Barnes, M. D., Craigie, I. D., Harrison, L. B., Geldmann, J., Collen, B., Whitmee, S., ... and Woodley, S. (2016). Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size. Nature communi-cations, 7(1), 1-9. Belokurov A, Besanc¸on C, Burgess ND, Dudley N, Hockings, M., Leverington F, MacKinnon K, Pavese H, Stolton S, Whitten T (2009) . New resources for as-sessing the effectiveness of management in protected areas. Oryx 43:14. Bertzky, M., and Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2009). Multi-level discrepancies with sharing data on protected areas: What we have and what we need for the global village. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(1), 8-24. Bowker, J. N., De Vos, A., Ament, J. M., and Cumming, G. S. (2017). Effectiveness of Africa's tropical protected areas for maintaining forest cover. Conservation Biology, 31(3), 559-569. Brooks, T. M., Mittermeier, R. A., Da Fonseca, G. A., Gerlach, J., Hoffmann, M., Lamoreux, J. F., ... and Rodrigues, A. S. (2006). Global biodiversity conserva-tion priorities. Science, 313(5783), 58-61. Bruner, A. G., Gullison, R. E., Rice, R. E., and Da Fonseca, G. A. (2001). Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science, 291(5501), 125-128. Carey, C., Dudley, N. and Stolton, S. 2000. Squandering Paradise: The importance and vulnerability of the world’s protected areas. WWF, Gland, Switzerland. Carter, R. W. (2013). Sustainable management of natural resources: guidelines for developing tourism in Kien Giang Province, particularly the Ha Tien-Dong Ho area. Ho Chi Minh city: Agricultural Publishing House. Cazalis, V., Belghali, S., and Rodrigues, A. S. (2019). Using a large-scale biodiversi-ty monitoring dataset to test the effectiveness of protected areas in conserving North American breeding birds. BioRxiv, 433037. Cazalis, V., Princé, K., Mihoub, J. B., Kelly, J., Butchart, S. H., and Rodrigues, A. S. (2020). Effectiveness of protected areas in conserving tropical forest birds. Nature communications, 11(1), 1-8. CBD. Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992). Available from: https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf Chape, S., Blyth, S., Fish, L., Fox, P., and Spalding, M. (2003). United Nations list of protected areas. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK and UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK. Chung, L. W., Chao, C. L., Liao, M. C., Kao, C. W., & Lu, D. J. (2023). Effectiveness and appropriateness of core areas in an integrated protected area: A case study of Ecological Protected Areas in Yangmingshan National Park, Taiwan. Envi-ronmental Science & Policy, 145, 175-187. Cifuentes M, Izurieta A, de Faria H (2000) Measuring protected area management effectiveness. Technical Series No. 2. WWF, IUCN, GTZ, Costa Rica. Clarke, R., and Mount, D. (2001). Areas of outstanding natural beauty management plans-a guide. Countryside Agency Publication. Coad, L., Leverington, F., Knights, K., Geldmann, J., Eassom, A., Kapos, V., Kingston, N., Lima, M., Zamor, C., Cuardros, I., Nolte, C., Burgess, N. D., and Hockings, M. (2015). Measuring impact of protected area management inter-ventions: current and future use of the Global Database of Protected Area Man-agement Effectiveness. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 370(1681), 20140281. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0281 Coad, L., Watson, J. E., Geldmann, J., Burgess, N. D., Leverington, F., Hockings, M., Knights, K., and Di Marco, M. (2019). Widespread shortfalls in protected area resourcing undermine efforts to conserve biodiversity. Frontiers in Ecolo-gy and the Environment, 17(5), 259-264. Coetzer, K. L., Witkowski, E. T., and Erasmus, B. F. (2014). Reviewing Biosphere Reserves globally: effective conservation action or bureaucratic label?. Biologi-cal Reviews, 89(1), 82-104. Conservation Measures Partnership (2006). IUCN-CMP unified classification of direct threats. Conservation Measures Partnership. 17 pp. www.conservationmeasurespartnership.org Cuong, C. V., Dart, P., and Hockings, M. (2017a). Using Enhancing our heritage toolkit for assessing management effectiveness of the Kien Giang Biosphere Reserve. International Journal of UNESCO Biosphere Reserves,1(2).56-76. Cuong, C. V., Dart, P., and Hockings, M. (2017b). Biosphere reserves: Attributes for success. Journal of Environmental Management, 188, 9-17. Diqiang, L., Jianhua, Z., Ke, D., Bo, W., and Chunquan, Z (2003). Management Effectiveness Assessment of Protected Areas in the Upper Yangtze Ecoregion using WWF’s RAPPAM Methodology. Gland (Switzerland): World Wide Fund for Nature. Dudley, N. (2004). How effective are protected areas? A preliminary analysis of forest protected areas by WWF. Report prepared for the 7th Confer-ence of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Dudley, N. (Ed.). (2008). Guidelines for applying protected area management cate-gories. With Stolton, S.P., Shadie, S. P., and Dudley, N. (2013). IUCN WCPA best practice guidance on recognising protected areas and assigning manage-ment categories and governance types, best practice protected area guidelines series No. 21. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Dudley, N., Hockings, M., and Stolton, S. (2004). Options for guaranteeing the effec-tive management of the world's protected areas. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 6(2), 131-142. Dudley, N., Hockings, M., Stolton, S. and Kiernan, M. 1999. Effectiveness of forest protected areas. A paper for the Intergovernmental Forum on Forests interses-sional meeting on protected areas in Puerto Rico, March 1999. http://www.equilibriumconsultants.com/upload/document/puertorico.pdf (ac-cessed on 2022/05/19). Dudley, N and Stolton, S (eds) (2008). Defining protected areas: an international conference in Almeria, Spain. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. 220 pp. Dudley, N., and Stolton, S. (2020). Leaving space for nature: the critical role of ar-ea-based conservation. Routledge. Eklund, J., and Cabeza, M. (2017). Quality of governance and effectiveness of protected areas: crucial concepts for conservation planning. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1399(1), 27-41. Eklund, J., Coad, L., Geldmann, J., and Cabeza, M. (2019). What constitutes a useful measure of protected area effectiveness? A case study of management inputs and protected area impacts in Madagascar. Conservation Science and Practice, 1(10), e107. Elleason, M., Guan, Z., Deng, Y., Jiang, A., Goodale, E., and Mammides, C. (2021). Strictly protected areas are not necessarily more effective than areas in which multiple human uses are permitted. Ambio, 50(5), 1058-1073. Ervin, J. (2003a). Protected Areas Assessment in Perspective. BioScience 53(9):819-822. Ervin, J. (2003b). Rapid assessment and prioritization of protected area management (RAPPAM) methodology. Gland, Switzerland: World Wildlife Fund. Ervin, J. (2007). Assessing protected area management effectiveness: a quick guide for protected area practitioners. The Nature Conservancy http://conserveonline.org/workspaces/patools/resources/pame/pameresources/pamedocs/pamequickguide/view. html, Arlington, VA. Eurosite (1999). Toolkit: Management Planning. Eurosite, Lille, France. Ferraro, P. J. (2009). Counterfactual thinking and impact evaluation in environmen-tal policy. In M. Birnbaum and P. Mickwitz (Eds.), Environmental program and policy evaluation: New Directions for Evaluation, Wiley InterScience, New York, pp. 75-84. Gaston, K. J., Jackson, S. F., Cantú-Salazar, L., and Cruz-Piñón, G. (2008). The ecological performance of protected areas. Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics, 39, 93-113. Doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173529 Geldmann, J., Barnes, M., Coad, L., Craigie, I. D., Hockings, M., and Burgess, N. D. (2013). Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines. Biological Conservation, 161, 230-238. Geldmann, J., Coad, L., Barnes, M. D., Craigie, I. D., Woodley, S., Balmford, A., Thomas, M., Hockings, M., Knights, K., Mascia, M.B., McRae, L., and Burgess, N. D. (2018). A global analysis of management capacity and ecological out-comes in terrestrial protected areas. Conservation Letters, 11(3), e12434. Geldmann, J., Manica, A., Burgess, N. D., Coad, L., and Balmford, A. (2019). A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting an-thropogenic pressures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(46), 23209-23215. Ghoddousi, A., Loos, J., and Kuemmerle, T. (2022). An outcome-oriented, social–ecological framework for assessing protected area effectiveness. BioSci-ence. 72 (2), 201-212. DOI:10.1093/biosci/biab114 Gibson, L., Lee, T. M., Koh, L. P., Brook, B. W., Gardner, T. A., Barlow, J., ... and Sodhi, N. S. (2011). Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical bi-odiversity. Nature, 478(7369), 378-381. Gill, D. A., Mascia, M. B., Ahmadia, G. N., Glew, L., Lester, S. E., Barnes, M., Cragie, I., Darling, E.S., Free, C.M., Geldmann, J., Holst, S., Jensen, O.P., White, A.T., Basurto, X., Coad, L., Gates, R.D., Guannel, G., Mumby, P.J., Thomas, H., Whitmee, S., Woodley, S., and Fox, H.E., (2017). Capacity short-falls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally. Nature, 543(7647), 665. Goodman, P. S. (2003). Assessing management effectiveness and setting priorities in protected areas in KwaZulu-Natal. BioScience, 53(9), 843-850. Graham, V., Geldmann, J., Adams, V. M., Grech, A., Deinet, S., and Chang, H. C. (2021). Management resourcing and government transparency are key drivers of biodiversity outcomes in Southeast Asian protected areas. Biological Con-servation, 253, 108875. Gray, C. L., Hill, S. L., Newbold, T., Hudson, L. N., Börger, L., Contu, S., ... and Scharlemann, J. P. (2016). Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside ter-restrial protected areas worldwide. Nature Communications, 7(1), 1-7. Harmon, D. (2008). What does IUCN’s protected area definition actually mean. In Defining Protected Areas: an international conference in Almeria. Spain: Inter-national Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (pp. 28-30). Heiland, S., May, A., and Scherfose, V. (2020). Evaluation of the management effectiveness of German National Parks—experiences, results, lessons learned and future prospects. Sustainability, 12(17), 7135. Hiley, J. R., Bradbury, R. B., and Thomas, C. D. (2016). Impacts of habitat change and protected areas on alpha and beta diversity of Mexican birds. Diversity and Distributions, 22(12), 1245-1254. Hillebrand, H., Blasius, B., Borer, E. T., Chase, J. M., Downing, J. A., Eriksson, B. K., ... and Ryabov, A. B. (2018). Biodiversity change is uncoupled from species richness trends: Consequences for conservation and monitoring. Journal of Ap-plied Ecology, 55(1), 169-184. Hirons, G., Goldsmith, B. and Thomas, G. (1995) Site management planning. In: Sutherland, W. J. and Hill, D. A. (Eds). Managing Habitats for Conservation (pp 22-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hockings, M. (1998). Evaluating management of protected areas: integrating plan-ning and evaluation. Environmental management, 22(3), 337-345. Hockings, M. (2003). Systems for assessing the effectiveness of management in protected areas. BioScience, 53(9), 823-832. Hockings, M. (2004) Maintaining protected areas for now and future: evaluating management effectiveness of protected areas. In: Biodiversity Issues for Con-sideration in the Planning, Establishment and Management of Protected Area Sites and Networks, Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Conservation, 119-127. Hockings, M., Dudley, N., MacKinnon, K., Whitten, T., and Leverington, F. (2003). Reporting progress in protected areas: A site-level management effectiveness tracking tool. World Bank/WWF Alliance for Forest Conservation and Sustainable Use. Hockings, M., Dudley, N., and Stolton, S. (2000a). The WCPA Management effectiveness framework–where to from here? in Rana D, Edelman L, eds. The Design and Management of Forest Protected Areas. Conference Proceedings for Beyond the Trees Conference, 8–11 May 2000, Bangkok, Thailand. Gland (Switzerland): World Wide Fund for Nature. Hockings, M., James, R., Stolton, S., Dudley, N., Mathur, V., Makombo, J., Courrau, J., and Parrish, J. (2008). Enhancing our Heritage Toolkit. Assessing Manage-ment Effectiveness of Natural World Heritage SitesUNESCO, Paris, France. Hockings, M., Leverington, F and R. James. (2006a). Evaluating management effec-tiveness. In Managing protected areas: A global study, eds. M. Lockwood, G. Worboys, and A. Kothari, 635-655. London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan. Hockings, M., and Phillips, A. (1999). How well are we doing? - some thoughts on the effectiveness of protected areas. Parks, 9(2), 5-14. Hockings, M., Stolton, S., Courrau, J., Dudley, N., and Parrish, J. (2004). The World Heritage Management Effectiveness Workbook: Revised Edition. Enhancing Our Heritage, University of Queensland, Gatton, Qld. Hockings, M., Stolton, S., Courrau, J., Dudley, N., Parrish, J., James, R., Mathur, V., and Makombo, J. (2007). The World Heritage Management Effectiveness Workbook: 2007 Edition. How to build monitoring, assessment and reporting systems to improve the management effectiveness of natural World Heritage sites (3rd draft). University of Queensland, Australia. Hockings, M., Stolton, S., and Dudley, N. (2000b). Evaluating effectiveness. A Framework for Assessing the Management of Protected Areas. Reihe: World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA): Best Practice Protected Area Guide-lines Series, 6. Hockings, M., Stolton, S., Leverington, F., Dudley, N. and Courrau, J. (2006b). Evaluating Effectiveness: A framework for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas. 2nd edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. Ishwaran, N. (2010). Biodiversity, people and places. Australasian Journal of Envi-ronmental Management, 17(4), 215-222. IUCN, (1999). International Workshop on management effectiveness of protected areas, In WWF Central America Regional Office: Proceedings of the work-shop in CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica, June 14-16. IUCN, (2006). Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria, Version 6.2. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Working Group of the IUCN SSC Biodiversity Assessments Sub-Committee in December 2006. www.iucnredlist.org/documents/redlist_guidelines_v1223290226.pdf IUCN WCPA, (2010). 50 Years of Working for Protected Areas: A brief history of IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas. Gland: IUCN. IUCN-WCPA Task Force on OECMs. (2019). Recognising and reporting other effective area‐based conservation measures. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. Idle, E. T., and Bines, T. J. H. (2005). Management planning for protected areas, a guide for practitioners and their bosses. Eurosite. Joppa, L. N., and Pfaff, A. (2009). High and far: biases in the location of protected areas. PloS one, 4(12), e8273. Katsanevakis, S., Stelzenmüller, V., South, A., Sørensen, T. K., Jones, P. J., Kerr, S., ... and ter Hofstede, R. (2011). Ecosystem-based marine spatial management: re-view of concepts, policies, tools, and critical issues. Ocean and coastal man-agement, 54(11), 807-820. Kemkes, W. (Ed.). (2008). Quality Criteria and Standards for German National Parks: Developing a Procedure to Evaluate Management Effectiveness. Europarc Deutschland. Available online: http://www.europarc-deutschland.de/wp-con-tent/uploads/2012/08/2008_Quality_criteria_and_standards_for_German_national_parks.pdf (accessed on 17 July 2022). Kenchington, R. A., and Day, J. C. (2011). Zoning, a fundamental cornerstone of effective Marine Spatial Planning: lessons learnt from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 15(2), 271-278. Leverington, F., Costa, K.L., Courrau, J., Pavese, H., Nolte, C., Marr, M., Coad, L., Burgess, N., Bomhard, B., Hockings, M. (2010a). Management Effectiveness Evaluation in Protected Areas- A Global Study, 2nd ed., 87pp. Leverington, F., Costa, K.L., Pavese, H., Lisle, A., Hockings, M. (2010b). A global analysis of protected area management effectiveness. Environmental Manage-ment. 46 (5), 685–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9564-5 Leverington, F., and Hockings, M. (2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of protected area management: The challenge of change. In Barber, C.V., Miller, K.R. and Boness, M. (eds). Securing Protected Areas in the Face of Global Change: Is-sues and Strategies. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. 169-215. Leverington, F., Hockings, M., and Costa, K. L.(2008a). Management Effectiveness Evaluation in Protected Areas: Report for the project ‘Global Study into Man-agement Effectiveness Evaluation of Protected areas’, The University of Queensland, Gatton, IUCN WCPA, TNC, WWF, Australia. Leverington, F., Hockings, M., Pavese, H., Costa, K. L., and Courrau, J., (2008b) Management Effectiveness Evaluation in Protected Areas - A global study : Supplementary report No.1: Overview of approaches and methodologies. The University of Queensland, Gatton, IUCN WCPA, TNC, WWF, Australia. Leverington, F., Kettner, A., Nolte, C., Kettner, A., Marr, M., Stolton, S., Pavese, H., Kleemann, S, S., and Hockings, M. (2010c). Protected area management effectiveness assessments in Europe. Supplementary Report, BfN-Skripten, 271b. Leverington, F., Peterson, A., and Peterson, G. (2017). Methodology for assessment of protected area management effectiveness in Papua New Guinea's protected areas. SPREP, Apia, Samoa. Li, W., Wang, Z., and Tang, H. (1999). Designing the buffer zone of a nature reserve: a case study in Yancheng Biosphere Reserve, China. Biological Conservation, 90(3), 159-165. Lotze-Campen, H., Reusswig, F., and Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2008). Socio-ecological monitoring of biodiversity change: Building upon the World Network of Bio-sphere Reserves. Gaia-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 17(1), 107-115. Lu, D. J., Kao, C. W., and Chao, C. L. (2012). Evaluating the management effectiveness of five protected areas in Taiwan using WWF’s RAPPAM. Envi-ronmental management, 50(2), 272-282. Luyssaert, S., Schulze, E., Börner, A., Knohl, A., Hessenmöller, D., Law, B. E., ... and Grace, J. (2008). Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks. Nature, 455(7210), 213-215. Ly, T. P. (2015). Assessment of ecotourism management in a strictly protected area of a National Park: Hang En Cave, Vietnam. The Athens Jean Monnet Papers. Jean Monnet European Center of Excellence – National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, No. 5, May 2015. MacKinnon, J., MacKinnon, K., Child, G., and Thorsell, J. W. (1986). Managing protected areas in the tropics. Based on workshops, World congress on national parks, Bali, Indonesia, October 1982, organized by the IUCN Commission on National Parks and Protected Areas. In Managing protected areas in the tropics. Based on workshops, World congress on national parks, Bali, Indonesia, Octo-ber 1982, organized by the IUCN Commission on National Parks and Protected Areas. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. Matar, D.A., and Anthony, B.P. (2017) UNESCO Biosphere Reserve management evaluation: Where do we stand and what’s next? Internafional Journal of UNESCO Biosphere Reserves, 1(1), 37-52. Mascia, M. B., and Pailler, S. (2011). Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) and its conservation implications. Conservation let-ters, 4(1), 9-20. Mascia, M. B., Pailler, S., Thieme, M. L., Rowe, A., Bottrill, M. C., Danielsen, F., ... and Burgess, N. D. (2014). Commonalities and complementarities among approaches to conservation monitoring and evaluation. Biological Conservation,169, 258-267. McNeely, J. A. (2020). Today's protected areas: supporting a more sustainable future for humanity. Integrative zoology, 15(6), 603-616. Meijaard, E., Denn, R., & Mous, P. (2010). Lessons from biosphere reserves in the Asia-Pacific region, and a way forward. Prepared for UNESCO Office, Jakarta. Moreaux, C., Zafra-Calvo, N., Vansteelant, N. G., Wicander, S., and Burgess, N. D. (2018). Can existing assessment tools be used to track equity in protected area management under Aichi Target 11?. Biological Conservation, 224, 242-247. Muruthi, P. (2006). The Process of Preparing a General Management Plan for a Protected Area. African Wildlife Foundation Working Papers, 1-11. Myers, N. (1988). Threatened biotas:" hot spots" in tropical forests. Environmental-ist, 8(3), 187-208. Myers, N. (1990). The biodiversity challenge: expanded hot-spots analysis. Environmentalist, 10(4), 243-256. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A., and Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403(6772), 853-858. Nagendra, H. (2008). Do parks work? Impact of protected areas on land cover clearing. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 37(5), 330-337. NPSAB. (2011). Principles and Guidelines for a New National Park Plan. National Park System Advisory Board. Oli, K. P., Chaudhary, S., and Sharma, U. R. (2013). Are governance and management effective within protected areas of the Kanchenjunga landscape (Bhutan, India and Nepal)?. Parks, 19(1), 25-36. Osipova, E., Shadie, P., Zwahlen, C., Osti, M., Shi, Y., Kormos, C., Bertzky, B., Murai, M., Van Merm, R., Badman, T. (2017). IUCN World Heritage Outlook 2: A conservation assessment of all natural World Heritage sites. Gland, Switzer-land: IUCN. 92pp. Osipova, E., Shi, Y., Kormos, C., Shadie, P., Zwahlen. C., Badman, T. (2014). IUCN World Heritage Outlook 2014: A conservation assessment of all natural World Heritage sites. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. 64pp. Parks Canada (1978). Planning Process for National Parks. Parks Canada, Ottawa, Canada. Pino-Del-Carpio, A., Ariño, A. H., Villarroya, A., Puig, J., and Miranda, R. (2014). The biodiversity data knowledge gap: Assessing information loss in the man-agement of Biosphere Reserves. Biological Conservation, 173, 74-79. Pressey, R. L., Visconti, P., and Ferraro, P. J. (2015). Making parks make a differ-ence: poor alignment of policy, planning and management with protected-area im-pact, and ways forward. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 370(1681), 20140280. Pressey, R. L., Weeks, R., and Gurney, G. G. (2017). From displacement activities to evidence-informed decisions in conservation. Biological Conservation, 212, 337-348. Price, M. F. (2002). The periodic review of biosphere reserves: a mechanism to fos-ter sites of excellence for conservation and sustainable development. Environmen-tal Science and Policy, 5(1), 13-18. Reed, M. G., and Massie, M. M. (2013). Embracing ecological learning and social learning: UNESCO biosphere reserves as exemplars of changing conservation practices. Conservation and Society, 11(4), 391-405. Rodrigues, A. S., Akcakaya, H. R., Andelman, S. J., Bakarr, M. I., Boitani, L., Brooks, T. M., ... and Hoffmann, M. (2004a). Global gap analysis: priority regions for expanding the global protected-area network. AIBS Bulletin, 54(12), 1092-1100. Rodrigues, A. S., Andelman, S. J., Bakarr, M. I., Boitani, L., Brooks, T. M., Cowling, R. M., ... and Yan, X. (2004b). Effectiveness of the global protected area net-work in representing species diversity. Nature, 428(6983), 640-643. Rodrigues, A. S., and Cazalis, V. (2020). The multifaceted challenge of evaluating protected area effectiveness. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18989-2 Rodríguez-Rodríguez, D. (2012). New issues on protected area management.Protected area management, 19-42. Rotich, D. J. (2012). Concept of zoning management in protected areas. Journal of Environment and Earth Science,2(10),173-183. Salafsky, N., Salzer, D., Stattersfield, A.J., Hilton‐Taylor, C., Neugarten, R., Butchart, S.H., Colien, B., Cox, N., Master, L. L., O’connor, S., Wilkie, D., 2008. A stand-ard lexicon for biodiversity conservation: unified classifications of threats and actions. Conservation Biology, 22(4): 897-911. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00937.x SCBD. (2010). COP10 Decision X/2: Strategic Plan for Biodiversity. 2011-2020. SCBD. (2020). Zero Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework.https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/efb0/1f84/a892b98d2982a829962b6371/wg2020-02-03-en.pdf. Schoon, M., Chapman, M., Loos, J., Ifejika Speranza, C., Carr Kelman, C., Aburto, J., ... and Whittaker, D. (2021). On the frontiers of collaboration and conflict: how context influences the success of collaboration. Ecosystems and people, 17(1), 383-399. Schultz, L., Duit, A., and Folke, C. (2011). Participation, adaptive co-management, and management performance in the world network of biosphere reserves. World Development, 39(4), 662-671. Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2010). Evaluation of management effectiveness in protected areas: methodologies and results. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11(5), 377-382. Stoll-Kleemann, S., Bertzky, M., De la Vega-Leinert, A. C., Fritz-Vietta, N., Leiner, N., Hirschnitz-Garbers, M., ... and Schliep, R. (2008). The governance of biodi-versity (GoBi) project: A vision for protected area management and governance. Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. Stolton, S., Courrau, J., & Mapesa, M. (2006). Case Study IV: Enhancing our Heritage: Monitoring and managing for success in natural world heritage sites. In Hockings, M. (2006). Evaluating Effectiveness: A framework for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas. IUCN. (IUCN Best Practice Pro-tected Areas Guidelines Series: Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK). Stolton, S., Dudley, N., Belokurov, A., Deguignet, M., Burgess, N. D., Hockings, M., ... and Young, L. (2019). Lessons learned from 18 years of implementing the management effectiveness tracking tool (METT): A perspective from the METT developers and implementers. Parks, 25(2), 79-92. Stolton, S., Hockings, M., Dudley, N., MacKinnon, K., Whitten, T., and Leverington, F. (2007) Reporting Progress in Protected Areas A Site-Level Management Ef-fectiveness Tracking Tool, 2nd ed.qpslcm@ikd World Bank/WWF Forest Alliance pub-lished by WWF: Gland, Switzerlandqpslcm@ikd Geneva, Switzerland. Sutherland WJ, Dicks LV, Ockendon N et al., eds (2018). What Works in Conserva-tion 2018. Open Book Publishers, Cambridge, UK. Thomas, L., and Middleton, J. (2003). Guidelines for management planning of pro-tected areas (Vol. 10). Gland Cambridge: IUCN. Thorsell, J. (1995) A Practical Approach to the Preparation of Management Plans for Natural Heritage Sites. Background paper prepared for Arab Region Training Course, Egypt. UNEP. (2012). Protected Planet Report 2012－Tracking progress towards global tar-gets for protected areas. United Nations Environment Programme. UNEP-WCMC (2018). 2018 United Nations List of Protected Areas. Supplement on protected area management effectiveness. UNEP-WCMC: Cambridge, UK. UNEP-WCMC (2020). Global Database on Protected Area Management Effectiveness (August update) .https://pame.protectedplanet.net/ UNEP-WCMC, IUCN and NGS. Protected Planet Live Report 2020. https://livereport.protectedplanet.net/ (2020). UNESCO. (1996). The Statutory Framework of the World Network of Biosphere Reserves. UNESCO, Paris. UNESCO. (2010). Lessons from Biosphere Reserves in the Asia-Pacific region, and a way forward: A regional review of biosphere reserves in Asia & the Pacific to achieve sustainable development. UNESCO, Jakarta Office. UNESCO. (2016). Lima Action Plan for UNESCO’s Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme and its World Network of Biosphere Reserves (2016–2025). USDI (1996). CRADAs – Cooperative Research and Development Agreements. Available from https://www.doi.gov/techtransfer/crada. USDI. (2000) National Park Service Strategic Plan FY 2001-2005. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR. http://npshistory.com/publications/management/nps-strategic-plan-2001-2005.pdf Visconti, P., Butchart, S. H., Brooks, T. M., Langhammer, P. F., Marnewick, D., Vergara, S., Yanosky, A., and Watson, J. E.M. (2019). Protected area targets post-2020. Science, 364(6437), 239-241. Vurnek, M., Brozinčević, A., Rendulić, Ž., Miculinić, K., Vukadin, V., and Škunca, O. (2019). Management zonation and its implementation at a UNESCO World Heritage Site–a case study for the Plitvice Lakes National Park, Croatia. Euro-pean. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 9(2), 87-96. Wolf, C., Levi, T., Ripple, W. J., Zárrate-Charry, D. A., and Betts, M. G. (2021). A forest loss report card for the world’s protected areas. Nature Ecology and Evo-lution, 5(4), 520-529. Worboys, G. L., Lockwood, M., and De Lacy, T. (2005). Protected area management: principles and practice (second edition). Oxford University Press, Melbourne. 中文部分 內政部 ( 1987 )。陽明山國家公園計畫。內政部。 內政部 ( 2013 )。陽明山國家公園計畫第三次通盤檢討。內政部。 內政部 ( 2012 )。101年－104年國家公園中程計畫。內政部。 內政部 ( 2019 )。109年－112年國家公園中程計畫。內政部。 內政部 ( 2022 )。陽明山國家公園計畫第四次通盤檢討。內政部。 內政部營建署 ( 2002 )。國家公園評鑑報告。內政部營建署成果報告書。 王震哲 ( 2001 )。陽明山國家公園磺嘴山生態保護區植物相調查。陽明山國家公園管理處。 何立德、 羅柳墀、 盧道杰、 陳維立、 徐嘉鴻 ( 2012 )。臺南縣曾文溪口北岸黑面琵鷺野生動物保護區經營管理效能評估. 地理學報, (65), 1-26. 何立德、呂政豪、汪碧涵、林良恭、 林宛柔、林惠真、林德恩、姚正得、姜博仁、施上粟、張育誠、黃國文、楊宗愈、葉明峰、盧道杰、謝長富( 2014 )。保護區經營管理技術手冊-基礎篇,行政院農委會林務局。 李光中、王鑫、張蘇芝、呂宜瑾 ( 2009 )。借鏡國際經驗研擬峽谷自然人文景觀保育政策計畫。太魯閣國家公園管理處。 李玲玲 ( 2003 )。國家公園保育及經營管理成效評量準則之建立。內政部營建署。 李玲玲、高雋、黃靖倫 ( 2005 )。國家公園保育成效監測系統之建立。內政部營建署。 李玲玲、趙榮台 ( 2005 )。臺灣現有保護區之分類檢討與管理現況分析。行政院農業委員會林務局。 李培芬 ( 2007 )。陽明山國家公園長期生態監測模式之建立。陽明山國家公園管理處。 林務局 ( 2011 )，檢討與改善現有保護區域與經營策略計畫。農委會林務局。 林務局 ( 2014 )，保護區經營管理技術手冊的編撰及知識管理系統的建構(3-3) 。農委會林務局。 林建元、蘇振綱 (2007)。國家公園土地利用與自然資源經營管理機制之研究。臺北：內政部營建署。 吳嘉苓 ( 2012 )。訪談法。瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞編，社會及行為科學研究法 (二)：質性研究法 33-60。台北市：東華。 林曜松、顏瓊芬、關永才 ( 1983 )。陽明山國家公園動物生態景觀資源。內政部營建署。臺北。 林曜松 ( 2000 )。陽明山國家公園磺嘴山生態保護區動物相調查研究。內政部營建署陽明山國家公園。臺北。 許立達、王義仲、李載鳴、林志欽 ( 2008 ) 陽明山國家公園植被變遷研究。陽明山國家公園管理處。臺北。 郭瓊瑩、蘇振綱 ( 2007 )。國家公園中長程保育政策及成效評估機制之建立。財團法人都市發展與環境教育基金會。 陳佑瑄 ( 2012 )。臺灣保護區經營管理效能評量 (RAPPAM) 之後設評量研究。國立臺灣大學森林環境暨資源學系碩士論文。 陳俊宏、李玲玲、吳書平、蘇夢淮、陶翼煌、林明聖、楊天南 ( 2010 )。陽明山國家公園陽金公路以東地區資源調查。陽明山國家公園管理處。 陳俊宏、李玲玲、吳書平、蘇夢淮、李建堂、溫在弘、林楨家、賴進貴 ( 2011 )。人類活動對陽明山國家公園百拉卡公路以北，陽金公路以西地區資源影響調查。陽明山國家公園管理處。 陳俊宏、李玲玲、吳書平、蘇夢淮、李建堂、溫在弘、黃誌川、賴進貴 ( 2012 )。陽明山國家公園自然生態環境及其土地利用之研究 (百拉卡公路以南，陽金公路以西地區) 。陽明山國家公園管理處。 陳俊宏、李玲玲、蘇夢淮、吳書平 ( 2016 )。陽明山國家公園指標生物及長期生態監測指標先驅研究 (2/2) 。陽明山國家公園管理處。 陳瑩慈 ( 2011 )。RAPPAM在臺灣於個案評量之適用性探討。國立臺灣大學森林環境暨資源學系碩士論文。 趙芝良、葉美智、盧道杰、陳瑋苓、徐霈馨 ( 2010 )。 高美野生動物保護區之經營管理效能評估. 國家公園學報, 20(4), 33-44. 楊苡芃 ( 2014 )。保護區經營管理效能評量方法的比較-以宜蘭無尾港水鳥保護區的施行經驗為例。國立臺灣大學森林環境暨資源學系碩士論文。 劉真汝 ( 2017 )。探討「增進我們的襲產」在挖子尾自然保留區的施作。國立臺灣大學森林環境暨資源學系碩士論文。 盧道杰、王牧寧、闕河嘉 ( 2008 )。無尾港水鳥保護區經營管理效能評量RAPPAM的引進與應用。地理學報﹝Di li xue baoqpslcm@ikd Journal of Geographical Science﹞54：51-78。 盧道杰、王牧寧 ( 2006 )。自然保護區經營管理效能評估初探—以宜蘭縣無尾港野生動物保護區為例. 國家公園學報,16(2): 85-100。 盧道杰、何立德、葉美智、趙芝良、賴欣欣 ( 2015 )。保護區經營管理規劃、期中快速評量及知識管理系統的建置 (1/3)。行政院農委會林務局補助研究計畫報告。 盧道杰、陳瑋苓、葉美智、何立德、趙芝良 ( 2020 )。保護區經營管理技術手冊編撰及經營管理知識網路系統的發展與維護(3/3)。林務局委託研究計畫報告。 盧道杰、葉美智、何立德、趙芝良、羅柳墀、蔡炯民 ( 2016 )。保護區經營管理規劃、期中快速評量及知識管理系統的建置(2/3) 盧道杰、施上粟、黃國文、趙芝良、薛美莉、羅暐菱 ( 2012 )。淡水河紅樹林、挖子尾與關渡三個自然保留區經營管理效能的系統評量。國家公園學報, 22(4): 34-46。 盧道杰、張如萱、張海寧、李詠寬 ( 2022 )。國家公園經營管理效能評量與政策規劃-以雪霸國家公園為例。內政部營建署。 盧道杰、趙芝良、陳瑋苓、葉美智、何立德 ( 2019 )。保護區經營管理技術手冊編撰及經營管理知識網路系統的發展與維護(2/3)。行政院農業委員林務局。 盧道杰、趙芝良、賴欣欣、鍾純玥、陳皓雲、李沛英 ( 2017 ) 。鹿角坑生態保護區經營管理效能評量與策略規劃。陽明山國家公園管理處。臺北。 盧道杰、趙芝良、羅欣怡、高千雯、陳維立、羅柳墀、葉美智、何立德、張弘毅、王中原 ( 2013 )。臺灣海岸河口溼地型保護區經營管理效能評估。地理學報 (68) : 19-42 盧道杰、趙芝良、闕河嘉、高千雯、張雅玲、張弘毅 ( 2011 )。臺灣保護區經營管理效能評量-五個個案的分析與解讀。地理學報62: 73-102 錢學陶、邊泰明、陳秀美、王安民、王憶靜、管敏玉 ( 1998 )。國家公園計畫與使用管理之研究。內政部營建署。 鍾莉文、盧道杰、林采萱、趙芝良、劉奇璋、廖敏君 ( 2017 )。陽明山國家公園磺嘴山生態保護區經營管理效能評量。國家公園學報 27:2.51-6 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92185 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 現今少有討論專注單一保護區經營管理效能評量的EoH的文獻，本研究的目的在描繪分析EoH評量陽明山國家公園磺嘴山及鹿角坑兩個生態保護區經營管理效能的過程與結果，並討論其對臺灣國家公園計畫的作用。本研究採質性研究中的文獻回顧、訪談及焦點團體 (參與式工作坊)，加上public participation geographic information system (PPGIS) 等方法，從2016年2月到2017年12月，以｢增進我們的襲產｣ (Enhancing our Heritage，簡稱EOH)，評量陽明山國家公園內磺嘴山及鹿角坑兩個生態保護區的經營管理效能，共進行60人次訪談，舉辦14次工作坊，累計共132人次/筆訪談紀錄。參與評量的人包括：曾或現正在園區內進行相關研究的學者專家、管理處各階層的員工、山友、軍營、志工、箭筍農、電台、里長等。EoH原始表單有12個工具組，田野執行合併性質類同的工具9 (tool 9) 與工具10，沒執行因基礎資料不足的工具11。結果發現，臺灣國家公園對比其他類型保護區，在人力、物力及財務機制上有占有優勢，但國家公園計畫未設定生態保護區的經營管理目標，有經營管理規劃邏輯連結不足的現象。權益關係人參與、及分區架構與工具，也有待加強。綜整林務局相關評量結果顯示，臺灣保護區普遍有外來入侵種、本土問題物種的壓力。本研究結果顯示，EOH能分析經營管理的優缺點，應對保護區現場的經營管理需求，且可提出補充的建議，更能對應經營管理規劃，將評量結果直接彙整入經營管理計畫。而其也能分析與釐清分區計畫、經營管理計畫或政策計畫的不足，是其他方法少見的功能。惟EOH的施行需要足夠的基礎資料的支持。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Where only a handful of EoH research discuss the management effectiveness in an individual protected area, this paper sets out to document and analyze the process and result of using EoH to asses the management effectiveness of two ecological protected areas in the Yangmingshan National Park in Taiwan and discuss how they affect the national park project. From Feb 2016 through Dec 2017, this study uses some of the methodologies of qualitative research i.e. literature review, interviews, and focus group (participatory evaluation), as well as public participation geographic information system (PPGIS), to evaluate the management effectiveness of Mt. Huangzui Ecological Protected Area and Lujiaokeng Ecological Protected Area in Yangmingshan by using the Enhancing our Heritage (EoH) Toolkit. A total of sixty one-on-one interviews and fourteen workshops were held, collecting a total of 132 interview records. The interviewees include : scholars and experts who have or are conducting relevant research in the park, employees of every rank at the national park office, hikers, military camp, volunteers, Oldham''s bamboo shoots farmers, radio station, and the neighborhood magistrate. There were twelve tool sets in the original list. The field research was conducted using tools of similar nature: Tool 9 and 10. Tool 11 was not used because of a lack of basic data. The result shows that Taiwan''s national parks have strengths in staffing, material and financial resources, when compared with other types of protected areas. However, neither management objectives nor a logical coherence between management and planning were in place. More efforts are needed in stakeholder participation and zoning framework and tools. An overview of Forestry Bureau''s evaluation shows Taiwan''s protected area is generally under the threat of alien species and problematic indigenous ones. The finding of this research shows that EoH can be applied to analyze the strength and weakness of management to make further suggestions in response to the management needs of the protected area. It can also facilitate management planning by incorporating the evaluation result to the management plan and analyze and clarify shortcomings in zoning planning, management planning, or policy planning. The latter is a function rarely seen in other methods. However, implementing EoH requires sufficient data support as a prerequisite. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-03-08T16:11:25Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-03-08T16:11:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
摘要 i Abstract ii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 6 第二章 文獻回顧 7 第一節 保護區 7 第二節 WCPA 經營管理架構的發展過程、應用及其優缺點 14 第三節 陽明山國家公園相關計畫檢討 37 第四節 陽明山國家公園中程計畫之檢討 41 第五節 國家公園考核制度 54 第六節 增進我們的襲產 (Enhancing our Heritage，簡稱EoH) 56 第三章 研究方法 59 第一節 研究範圍 59 第二節 陽明山國家公園生態保護區經營管理效能評量的方法與步驟 61 第三節 研究方法 63 第四節 研究流程 64 第五節 EoH相關研究 67 第四章 陽明山生態保護區經營管理效能評量 81 第一節 磺嘴山生態保護區資源簡介 82 第二節 鹿角坑生態保護區資源簡介 84 第三節 磺嘴山生態保護區經營管理效能評量 87 第四節 鹿角坑生態保護區經營管理效能評量 103 第五節 鹿角坑生態保護區重要工作項目 126 第六節 陽明山國家公園生態保護區管理相關議題 127 第五章 陽明山國家公園生態保護區經營管理 129 第一節 陽明山國家公園生態保護區經營管理效能評量的結果 129 第二節 陽明山國家公園生態保護區經營管理效能評量的討論 141 第三節 和林務局轄下保護區比較經營管理效能評量的過和結果 142 第四節 EoH方法學回顧 144 第六章 結論及討論 147 第一節 陽明山國家公園生態保護區 (設計/規劃-脈絡) 147 第二節 陽明山國家公園生態保護區 (設計/規劃-威脅/壓力分析) 149 第三節 陽明山國家公園生態保護區 (規劃及充分性/適當性) 151 第四節 陽明山國家公園生態保護區(傳達) 153 第五節 研究限制、研究貢獻及未來研究建議 156 第七章 參考文獻 158 附錄一臺灣國家公園願景目標與政策策略表 173 附錄二 陽明山國家公園保護管制計畫內容 177 圖次 圖 1保護區效能的不同面向 (Rodrigues 及 Cazalis, 2020) 19 圖 2 WCPA經營管理循環 (Hockings et al., 2006b) 30 圖 3 經營管理規劃流程圖 (Alexander, 2005 p15) 37 圖 4國際間國家公園政策及策略架構示意圖 48 圖 5陽明山國家公園計畫之架構圖 51 圖 6美國國家公園系統的經營管理規劃與決策架構 ( NPS，2004） 53 圖 7美國國家公園規劃與政策架構相關之計畫文件 (NPS，2004） 54 圖 8陽明山國家公園計畫分區圖 60 圖 9 EoH工具與WCPA架構的關聯 67 圖 10陽明山國公園計畫範圍示意圖 (內政部，2022) 69 圖 11本研究執行EoH工具與WCPA架構間的關聯 71 圖 12研究流程圖 76 圖 13陽明山山生態保護區位置圖 (本研究繪製) 90 圖 14 陽明山國家公園兩個生態保護區的威脅及其嚴重程度 143 圖 15主要計劃書之適當性 144 圖 16保護區經營管理過程 145 表次 表 1 保護區經營管理效能評量的準則 22 表 2 評量及保護區經營管理循環 24 表 3評量類型的內容重點 24 表 4 保護區經營管理效能評量架構 26 表 5經營管理循環要素 29 表 6 PLNP經營管理計畫分區比較表 42 表 7 2019-2028 PLNP經營管理計畫分區 43 表 8國家公園主要計畫與細部計畫 47 表 9美國國家公園署計畫目標摘要 56 表 10黃石國家公園任務計畫 57 表 11國家公園發展願景目標 59 表 12陽明山國家公園計畫實施情形 61 表 13陽明山國家公園計畫目標彙整表 61 表 14國家公園考核 64 表 15 EoH內容 66 表 16威脅壓力表 (摘錄一題) 72 表 17 KGBR經營管理效能評量的結果 78 表 18未來挑戰比較表 79 表 19 Sangay國家公園的主要價值 84 表 20 初步評量中發現的空缺 86 表 21磺嘴山生態保護區的主要價值 98 表 22經營管理原則目標與價值 99 表 23磺嘴山生態保護區威脅壓力表 100 表 24工具3 與權益關係人的關係 101 表 25工具5a經營管理計畫資訊 104 表 26工具5b 主要計畫書的適當性 (摘錄第1題) 105 表 27磺嘴山生態保護區生態完整度 106 表 28磺嘴山生態保護區經營管理要素 106 表 29工具7a經營管理需求與員工投入 107 表 30經營管理需求與預算投入 108 表 31經營管理架構與系統 108 表 32工具9+工具10產出評量 111 表 33經營管理效能評量結果回顧 112 表 34 鹿角坑生態保護區的價值 117 表 35經營管理原則目標與價值 118 表 36鹿角坑生態保護區威脅壓力表 119 表 37 回顧國家政策內容 122 表 38工具5經營管理計畫資訊 123 表 39 主要計畫書的適當性 (摘錄第1題) 124 表 40生態完整度 125 表 41 鹿角坑生態保護區社區福祉 126 表 42 鹿角坑生態保護區經營管理要素 126 表 43 經營管理需求與員工投入 127 表 44經營管理需求與預算投入 128 表 45評量經營管理過程 129 表 46產出評估 133 表 47經營管理效能評量結果回顧 134 表 48鹿角坑生態保護區重要工作項目表 135 表 49 鹿角坑生態保護區長期監測意義與對象 137 表 50生態保護區保護利用綱要 139 表 51陽明山國家公園生態保護區的價值 140 表 52陽明山國家公園生態保護區的目標 141 表 53生態保護區面積變化表 147 表 54兩座生態保護區壓力分析表 149 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 保護區經營管理規劃 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 威脅/壓力分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 核心區 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 經營管理效能評量 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 增進我們的襲產 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | threat/pressure analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Protected area management planning | en |
| dc.subject | Enhancing our Heritage | en |
| dc.subject | management effectiveness evaluation | en |
| dc.subject | core area | en |
| dc.title | 綜合型保護區核心區的效能及適當性：以陽明山國家公園生態保護區為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Effectiveness and appropriateness of core areas in an integrated protected area：A case study of ecological protected areas in Yangmingshan National Park | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李素馨;何立德;趙芝良;葉美智;陳瑋苓;廖敏君 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Su-Hsin Li;Lih-Der Ho;Chin-Liang Chao;Mei-Chih Yeh;Wei-Lin Chen;Min-Chun Liao | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 保護區經營管理規劃,威脅/壓力分析,核心區,經營管理效能評量,增進我們的襲產, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Protected area management planning,threat/pressure analysis,core area,management effectiveness evaluation,Enhancing our Heritage, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 179 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202400615 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-02-17 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2029-02-06 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 森林環境暨資源學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-1.pdf Restricted Access | 3.76 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.