請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92145
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 簡旭伸 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Shiuh-Shen Chien | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳璨宇 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Tsan-Yu Chen | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-07T16:17:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-08 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2024-03-07 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2024-02-17 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 1.Athman, J. A., & Monroe, M. C. (2001). Elements of Effective Environmental Education Programs.
2.Azjen, I. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood cliffs. 3.Blake, J. (1999). Overcoming the ‘value‐action gap’ in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience. Local environment, 4(3), 257-278. 4.Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Cognitive domain. 5.Cantrill, .J G. (1992). Understanding environmental advocacy: Interdisciplinary research and the role of cognition. The Journal of Environmental Education, 24 (1) :35-42. 6.Carleton-Hug, A., & Hug, J. W. (2010). Challenges and opportunities for evaluating environmental education programs. Evaluation and program planning, 33(2), 159-164. 7.Chin, C. C. (1993). A study of environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of secondary students and pre-and in-service teachers in Taiwan. The University of Iowa. 8.Franzen, R. L. (2012). Incorporation and use of the NAAEE “Guidelines for the Preparation and Professional Development of Environmental Educators” in elementary teacher education programs (Doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University). 9.Gigliotti, L. M. (1990). Environmental education: What went wrong? What can be done?. The Journal of Environmental Education, 22(1), 9-12. 10.Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of environmental education, 18(2), 1-8. 11.Hsu, S. J., & Roth, R. E. (1998). An assessment of environmental literacy and analysis of predictors of responsible environmental behaviour held by secondary teachers in the Hualien area of Taiwan. Environmental education research, 4(3), 229-249. 12.Hungerford, H. R., & Peyton, R. B. (1976). Teaching environmental education. 13.Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1985). Science Teaching Methods for the Elementary School: A Worktext. Stipes Publishing Co., 10-12 Chester St., Champaign, IL 61820. 14.Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The journal of environmental education, 21(3), 8-21. 15.Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environmental education research, 8(3), 239-260. 16.Liu, S. Y., Yeh, S. C., Liang, S. W., Fang, W. T., & Tsai, H. M. (2015). A national investigation of teachers’ environmental literacy as a reference for promoting environmental education in Taiwan. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46(2), 114-132. 17.Marcinkowski, T., & Rehrig, L. (1993). The secondary school report: A final report on the development, pilot testing, validation, and field testing of the Secondary School Environmental Literacy Assessment Instrument. Environmental education literacy/needs assessment project: Assessing environmental literacy of students and environmental education needs of teachers: Final report for, 1995, 30-76. 18.Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions. Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1-19. 19.Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University press. 20.McDonald, J. T., & Dominguez, L. A. (2010). Professional preparation for science teachers in environmental education. The inclusion of environmental education in science teacher education, 17-30. 21.North American Association for Environmental Education, & National Project for Excellence in Environmental Education (US). (2019). K-12 Environmental Education: Guidelines for Excellence. North American Association for Environmental Education. 22.North American Association for Environmental Education, & National Project for Excellence in Environmental Education (US). (2022). Environmental Education Programs: Guidelines for Excellence. North American Association for Environmental Education. 23.North American Association for Environmental Education, & National Project for Excellence in Environmental Education (US). (2021). Environmental Education Materials: Guidelines for Excellence. North American Association for Environmental Education. 24.Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. Psychology Press. 25.Pearson, E., Dorrian, J., & Litchfield, C. (2011). Harnessing visual media in environmental education: increasing knowledge of orangutan conservation issues and facilitating sustainable behaviour through video presentations. Environmental Education Research, 17(6), 751-767. 26.Roth, C. E. (1992). Environmental literacy: its roots, evolution and directions in the 1990s. 27.Sia, A. P., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1986). Selected predictors of responsible environmental behavior: An analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 17(2), 31-40. 28.Van Hiel, A., Van Assche, J., De Cremer, D., Onraet, E., Bostyn, D., Haesevoets, T., & Roets, A. (2018). Can education change the world? Education amplifies differences in liberalization values and innovation between developed and developing countries. PLoS One, 13(6), e0199560. 29.Van Hiel, A., Van Assche, J., De Cremer, D., Onraet, E., Bostyn, D., Haesevoets, T., & Roets, A. (2018). Can education change the world? Education amplifies differences in liberalization values and innovation between developed and developing countries. PLoS One, 13(6), e0199560. 30.方俊德(2022)。綠色經濟的發展新趨勢。臺灣經濟研究月刊,45(1),41-47。 31.方偉達(2019)。環境教育:理論、實務與案例。臺北市:五南出版社。 32.王健全(2018)。未來工作世界之人力發展趨勢與因應。臺灣勞工季刊,(56),4-15。 33.全球環境教育夥伴亞太中心。(2021)。改變的力量-臺灣環境教育法的10年回顧與展望. 全球環境教育夥伴亞太中心。https://geepaprc.org/zh-tw/news/改變的力量-臺灣環境教育法的10年回顧與展望。 34.江昱仁,黃宗成,郭孟妮,& 張文娟。(2008)。利用生態旅遊進行環境教育對學生環境認知,環境態度和環境行為的影響。運動休閒餐旅研究,3(4),69-99。 35.吳鈴筑,& 張子超。 (2017)。 探討公私部門環境教育設施場所認證之發展概況:以100至104年間資料為例。環境教育研究,13(1),99-136。 36.改變的力量 臺灣環境教育法的10年回顧與展望。(n.d.)。全球環境教育夥伴亞太中心。https://geepaprc.org/zh-tw/news/改變的力量-臺灣環境教育法的10年回顧與展望。 37.周儒。(1992)。非正規環境教育與博物館。博物館學季刊,6(3),71-76。 38.林秀芝,&鄭永熏。(2016)。多媒體教學與學生學習風格對教育目標達成度之影響:以國中烘培教學為例。餐旅暨觀光,13(1),1-20。 39.張正杰, 莊秀卿, & 羅綸新。 (2014)。 多媒體呈現模式與認知風格對國小自然科學學習成效之影響。 教育傳播與科技研究, (108), 31-48。 40.張春炎,楊樺,葉欣誠,(2019),院線環境紀錄片作為環境教育影片的反思與分析:以《±2℃》,《看見臺灣》為例。環境教育研究,15(2), 45-79。 41.張瓊文(2011)。多媒體教材融入教學對國中生歷史學習成就。稻江科技暨管理學 院動畫遊戲設計學系碩士論文,未出版。嘉義縣。 42.教育部 (2019)。十二年國教議題融入說明手冊。臺北市:教育部。 43.教育部。(2019)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要議題融入說明手冊。 44.曹琬凌。(2015)。院線紀錄片再媒介化之媒介化分析:以 [《看見臺灣》] 經驗為例:傳播研究與實踐,5(2),121-153。 45.梁家祺。(2011)。 [知行合一] 對通識環境教育課程設計的啟發。通識教育學刊, (7),39-59。 46.許世璋 & 徐家凡。(2012)。池南自然教育中心一日型方案 [天空之翼] 對於六年級生環境素養之成效分析。科學教育學刊,20(1),69-94。 47.許世璋。(2003)。大學環境教育課程對於環境行動與其它環境素養變項之成效分析。科學教育學刊,11(1),97-119。 48.陳郁方。(2021)。觀賞者之環境態度建構初探——以海洋環境保護影片為例。 49.楊冠政。(1998)。環境教育。明文書局。 50.楊國賜。(2016)。台灣推動環境教育的現況與問題及其因應策略。台灣教育,(697),2-7。 51.齊柏林,《看見台灣》(台北:台灣阿布電影,2013)。 52.劉潔心和晏涵文(1997):師範院校環境教育介入研究—著重師院學生負責任環境行為及其相關因素之成效分析。八十六年度環境教育研討會論文彙編,49-70。 53.潘文福(2008)。以數位典藏觀點探討學童應具備的媒體素養。臺灣圖書館管理季刊,4,57-66。 54.蘇揚閔(2023)。以體驗式環境教育課程對環境素養與學習興趣的成效探討-以曾文水庫為例。 國立臺中教育大學科學教育與應用學系環境教育與管理碩士班碩士論文。 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92145 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 環境教育被視為解決環境問題與提升環境素養的重要手段。然而,過去以課程內容為主的環境教育研究,多聚焦於正規教育中的環境教育體制 (如中小學),較少針對非正規環境教育體制 (如坊間環教場所)進行探討。因此,本研究選擇了擁有在空拍影像特色,極具代表性的「看見.齊柏林基金會」,作為非正規環境教育設施場所的案例研究。
本研究透過參與「看見.齊柏林基金會」環境教育課程的規劃和實踐,除了從課程設計和課程實施者的角度思考環境教育課程的組成和傳遞方法外,也根據教學過程中的逐字稿紀錄,分析各堂課程中環境認知、情意及技能的占比。 教學過程中的逐字稿分析結果顯示,基金會的環境課程中皆偏重於環境認知的傳遞,嚴重缺乏環境情意的表達,又現有的課程未能有效利用基金會的空拍影像特色與優勢提升環境教育效果,如利用空拍影像展現環境問題之嚴重程度與規模、串連多視角空拍影像串連環境系統概念等。這與基金會過去的典範環境教育產品紀錄片─《看見臺灣》的分析結果有顯著差異。 本研究者進一步利用北美環境教育學會(NAAEE)的一系列環境教育指引與多媒體認知理論素材原則、佐參考《看見臺灣》紀錄片的環境素養傳遞模式分析結果,提出基金會課程內容改善建議。本研究者建議基金會於環境教育課程中選用合適的空拍影像,串連多視角、多焦段的環境影像傳遞環境情意,且使用影像時遵守多媒體認知理論素材原則;亦建議基金會將環境情意加入現有的討論環節,確保環境情意受到學生充分的討論與思考。 本研究者進一步設計符合基金會特性和需求的環境教育指南和課程設計模板,作為基金會未來環境教育課程設計的參考。此課程設計模板除提高本研究策略建議應用的可行性外,也期望對基金會與臺灣的環境教育產生正面影響力。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Environmental education is regarded as a crucial means to address environmental issues as well as to enhance environmental literary. However, past research on environmental education with curriculum analysis as its focus has mostly paid attention to those conducted in formal education institutions (like primary and high schools). What is less examined is those conducted in non-formal education institutions (such as environmental education centers organized by civil society organizations, companies, and governments). This study fills the gap by using the “Chi Po-Lin Foundation (thereafter CPLF),” renowned for its distinctive aerial image resources, as a case study.
In order to assess the proportion of environmental cognition, affection, and action skills content in each program of the CPLF''s environmental education activities, an analysis of curriculum design, teaching methods and verbatim transcripts of presentations is conducted. We reveal that the CPL foundation more emphasizes environmental cognition rather than environmental affection. Additionally, the existing curriculum fails to effectively utilize the foundation''s aerial imaging features and advantages, therefore resulting in the severity and scale of environmental problems and no less to say poor integration of multi-perspective aerial imagery with limited understanding of environmental system as a whole. The effectiveness in environmental education programs of CPLF is in a shark difference from the CPLF signature documentary film "Beyond Beauty - Taiwan from Above," where such aerial elements were more highly incorporated. With a guideline proposed by the North American Association for Environmental Education (NAAEE) and a principle of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning (CTML), this research proposes following recommendations for CPLF to improve its curriculum, including incorporating suitable aerial footage into the environmental education program, connecting environmental imagery from multiple perspectives and focal ranges to convey environmental affection, and integrating environmental affection into existing discussion segments, with related environmental teaching guideline as well as presentation template to be provided. Those recommendations are expected for CPLF to exert more positive influence in the field of environmental education in Taiwan. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-03-07T16:17:21Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-03-07T16:17:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次 i
誌謝 iv 中文摘要 v 英文摘要 vi 圖次 viii 表次 x 第一章、緒論 1 1.1 研究動機及背景 1 1.2 研究場域介紹 2 1.3 研究問題 6 1.4 研究架構 6 第二章、文獻回顧 8 2.1 環境教育的緣起與定義概述 8 2.2 環境教育的重要性與目標 9 2.3 環境素養模式 9 2.4 環境教育現場遇到的障礙 11 2.5 體制外的環境教育 14 2.6 NAAEE卓越指引 (Guidelines for Excellence)中環境情意傳遞指引........15 2.7 多媒體應用於教育中的研究回顧 19 第三章、研究方法 23 3.1 研究對象與範疇 23 3.2 教學實踐與資料收集 24 3.3 課程環境素養模式內容分析標籤 24 3.4 課程內容分析流程與方法 28 3.5 NAAEE的卓越指引(Excellence in Environmental Education Guidelines)參考應用 29 第四章、「看見.齊柏林基金會」環境教育課程現況分析報告 31 4.1 課程教案內容分析討論 31 4.2 課程授課內容分析討論. 35 4.3 討論 38 4.4 結論 41 第五章、《看見臺灣》紀錄片作為「看見.齊柏林基金會」典範環境教育產品與「從空中看臺灣」B方案課程環境素養傳達比較分析 42 5.1 《看見臺灣》紀錄片環境素養佔比內容分析 42 5.2 《看見臺灣》紀錄片環境情意內容與「從空中看臺灣」B方案課程比較 44 5.3 比較結論與建議 49 第六章、 「看見.齊柏林基金會」環境教育改善策略建議 51 6.1 「看見.齊柏林基金會」環境教育改善策略指引 51 6.2 符合改善策略建議「從空中看臺灣B方案」課程設計模組 53 6.3 基金會回覆 64 第七章、 結論與討論 66 7.1 結論 66 7.2 討論 67 第八章、 參考文獻 70 附錄一、 實習歷程 75 附錄二、 單次課程環境素養占比 77 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 環境教育課程之現況分析與精進策略: 以「看見.齊柏林基金會」為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Analysis of the Current Status and Enhancement Strategies of Environmental Education Curriculum: A Case Study of the Chi Po-Lin Foundation | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-1 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 謝宜桓 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | Yi-Huan Hsieh | en |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張子超;方偉達 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Tzu-Chau Chang;Wei-Ta Fang | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 環境教育,環境素養,非正規教育,永續發展,多媒體教育, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Environmental education,Environmental literacy,Non-formal Education,Sustainable development,Multimedia education, | en |
dc.relation.page | 80 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202400640 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2024-02-17 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程(含碩士班、博士班) |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-1.pdf | 4.78 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。