請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92103完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 彭立沛 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Li-Pei Peng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 許茜 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Chien Hsu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-05T16:18:07Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-03-06 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-03-05 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-02-06 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Adam, L., Jin, J., 和 Khan, A. (2022). Does the indonesian farmer empowerment policy enhance the professional farmer? empirical evidence based on the difference-in-difference approach. Technology in Society, 68, 101924.
AGRICULTURE, U. D. O. (2023). 2022 census of agriculture impacts the next generations of farmers. (Retrieved from https://www.usda.gov/media/blog/2023/ 02/22/2022-census-agriculture-impacts-next-generations-farmers) Ahearn, M. C., 和 Newton, D. J. (2009). Beginning farmers and ranchers. Economic Information Bulletin(53). Ahmad, M. (2014). Farmer empowerment to increase productivity of sago (metroxylon sago spp) farming. JEP, 15(2). Alliance, I. C. (2023). Cooperative identity, values & principles. (Retrieved from https://www.ica.coop/en/cooperatives/cooperative-identity) Brunori, G., 和 Rossi, A. (2000). Synergy and coherence through collective action: some insights from wine routes in tuscany. Sociologia ruralis, 40(4), 409–423. Buschle, C., Reiter, H., 和 Bethmann, A. (2022). The qualitative pretest interview for questionnaire development: Outline of programme and practice. Quality & Quantity, 56(2), 823–842. Candemir, A., Duvaleix, S., 和 Latruffe, L. (2021). Agricultural cooperatives and farm sustainability–a literature review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35(4), 1118–1144. Centre, F. S. L. E. (2015). The land partnerships handbook - using land to unlock business innovation. (Retrieved from www.freshstartlandenterprise.org.uk) Chen, C.-Y., 和 Cheng, Y. (2018). 農業工作者的職業傷病與職災補償制度. Taiwan Gong Gong Wei Sheng Za Zhi, 37(3), 237. Commission, E. (2023). Akis in the eip-agri spotlight. (Retrieved from https://www .coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=12300) Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education, Inc. Creswell, J. W., 和 Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications. Denzin, N. (1989). (1989b). the research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods . englewood cliffs, nj: Prentice hall. Desiana, N., 和 Aprianingsih, A. (2017). Improving income through farmers’ group empowerment strategy. The Asian Journal of Technology Management, 10(1), 41. Emery, S. B. (2015). Independence and individualism: conflated values in farmer cooperation? Agriculture and human values, 32, 47–61. FAO. (2022). Agricultural production statistics. 2000–2020. faostat analytical brief series no. 41. Forney, J. (2021). Farmers''empowerment and learning processes in accountability practices: An assemblage perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 86, 673–683. Friis-Hansen, E. (2005). Agricultural development among poor farmers in soroti district, uganda: impact assessment of agricultural technology, farmer empowerment and changes in opporunity structures. Friis-Hansen, E., 和 Kisauzi, D. (2002). Evolution of extension–farmer relationship in uganda. In Proceedings of workshop on extension and rural development: A convergence of views on international approaches, washington, dc, 12á15 november. Fuchs-Heinritz, W., 和 Barlösius, E. (1994). Lexikon zur soziologie. Dordrecht, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag Opladen, Springer. Gubrium, J. F., 和 Holstein, J. A. (2001). Handbook of interview research: Context and method. Sage Publications. Gustafsson, J. (2017). Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: A comparative study. Hossain, M., 和 Kauranen, I. (2015). Crowdsourcing: a comprehensive literature review. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 8(1), 2–22. Howe, J., et al. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired magazine, 14(6), 176–183. i Rico, N. M., 和 Fuller, A. M. (2016). Newcomers to farming: towards a new rurality in europe. Documents d’anàlisi geogràfica, 62(3), 531–551. Israel, B. A., Checkoway, B., Schulz, A., 和 Zimmerman, M. (1994). Health education and community empowerment: conceptualizing and measuring perceptions of individual, organizational, and community control. Health education quarterly, 21(2), 149–170. Klischat, U., Klischat, U., 和 Habermann, I. (2001). Erfolgsbestimmende faktoren in landwirtschaftlichen kooperationen aus sicht von betroffenen. Betriebsgemeinschaften in der Landwirtschaft–Chancen und Grenzen im Strukturwandel. Schriftenreihe Rentenbank, 15, 179–220. Koçel, T. (2010). İşletme yöneticiliği, beta basım yayım dağıtım. İstanbul. Kreisberg, S. (1992). Transforming power: Domination, empowerment, and education. SUNY Press. Kurochkina, K. (2015). Farming as a job: Motivations for becoming a farmer for modern japanese young people. СБОРНИК ТЕЗИСОВ, 42. LeVay, C. (1983). Agricultural cooperative theory: A review. Journal of agricultural economics, 34(1), 1–44. LORENCOWICZ, E., 和 UZIAK, J. (2013). Farmers collaboration–a factor in the development of sustainable agriculture. Farm Machinery and Processes Management in Sustainable Agriculture, 139. Ltd, B. . L. N. Z. (2020). Farm ownership and transition. (Retrieved from https://beeflambnz.com/about-blnz/company-profile) Margerum, R. D. (2011). Beyond consensus: Improving collaborative planning and management. Mit Press. McGreevy, S. R., Kobayashi, M., 和 Tanaka, K. (2019). Agrarian pathways for the next generation of japanese farmers. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement, 40(2), 272–290. Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., 和 Alexander, L. (1996). In depth interviewing south melbourne. Addison Wesley Longman Australia Pty Limited. Monllor i Rico, N., et al. (2011). Explorant la jove pagesia: camins, pràctiques i actituds en el marc d’un nou paradigma agrosocial. estudi comparatiu entre el sudoest de la província d’ontario i les comarques gironines (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat de Girona. Morris, C., Jarrett, S., Lobley, M., 和 Wheeler, R. (2017). Baseline farm survey–final report. report for defra project lm0302 sustainable intensification research platform project 2: Opportunities and risks for farming and the environment at landscape scales. Morris, J. R., 和 Brady, P. L. (2004). The muscadine experience: adding value to enhance profits. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., 和 Leech, N. L. (2005). Taking the “q" out of research: Teaching research methodology courses without the divide between quantitative and qualitative paradigms. Quality and Quantity, 39, 267–295. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., 和 Leech, N. L. (2007). A call for qualitative power analyses. Quality & quantity, 41(1), 105–121. Organization, I. L. (2023). International year of microcredit 2005. (Retrieved from http://ilo.org/moscow/news/WCMS_481945/lang--en/index.htm) Özdemir, H. Ö., Kan, M., Doğan, H. G., 和 Kan, A. (2020). The factors affecting psychological empowerment levels of entrepreneurs in agricultural holdings of kirsehir province, turkey. Pakistan Journal Of Agricultural Sciences, 57(3). Padgett, D. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research (2. útgáfa). Thousands Oaks: Sage Publications. Page, N., 和 Czuba, C. E. (1999). Empowerment: What is it. Journal of extension, 37(5), 1–5. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications. Prendes Espinosa, M., 和 Castañeda Quintero, L. J. (2009). Formal, non formal and informal collaboration: Relationship models for the new media. Pretty, J. N. (1991). Farmers’ extension practice and technology adaptation: Agricultural revolution in 17–19th century britain. Agriculture and Human Values, 8, 132–148. Priyadi, Y. F. A., Hani, E. S., 和 Saito, Y. (2022). Partnership impact on production and income of indonesia rubber farmers. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 11(3), 381–393. Ramanauskas, J., Vienažindienė, M., Rauluškevičienė, J., 和 Žukovskis, J. (2021). Collaboration perspectives developing sustainable agriculture: The case of Lithuanian farmers. European Countryside, 13(4), 697–714. Rifkin, S. B. (2003). A framework linking community empowerment and health equity: it is a matter of choice. Journal of health, population and nutrition, 168–180. Rosenberger, N. (2014).`making an ant''s forehead of difference'': Organic agriculture as an alternative lifestyle in japan. Capturing contemporary Japan: Differentiation and uncertainty, 105–134. Rowlands, J. (1995). Empowerment examined. Development in practice, 5(2), 101–107. Sawada, M. (2003). Shuno-ruto tayouka no tennkai ronri [the diversification of pathways into farming]. Tokyo: Association of Agriculture and Forestry Statistics. Schiller, S., Gonzalez, C., 和 Flanigan, S. (2015). More than just a factor in transition processes? the role of collaboration in agriculture. In Transition pathways towards sustainability in agriculture: case studies from europe (pp. 83–96). CABI Walling-ford UK. Service, N. A. S. (2022). Farms and land in farms. (Retrieved from https://data.nass.usda.gov/economics/farms-and-land-in-farms/) Smith, L. P. (1962). The evolution of agricultural co-operation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 17(902-2016-67571), 95–98. Smith, W., 和 Darko, E. (2014). Social enterprise: constraints and opportunities–evidence from vietnam and kenya. ODI. www. odi. org/publications/8303-social-enterprise-constraintsopportunities-evidence-vietnam-kenya. Specialists, A. R. (2023). How to progress your career in farming. (Retrieved from https://www.agrirs.co.uk/blog/2019/06/how-to-progress-your-career-in-farming?source=google.com) Spreitzer, G. M., Kizilos, M. A., 和 Nason, S. W. (1997). A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiveness satisfaction, and strain. Journal of management, 23(5), 679–704. Spyridakis, M., 和 Dima, F. (2017). Reinventing traditions: Socially produced goods in eastern crete during economic crisis. Journal of Rural Studies, 53, 269–277. Van Hoye, I. (2017). Eip-agri focus group new entrants to farming: lessons to foster innovation and entrepreneurship. Velten, S., Jager, N. W., 和 Newig, J. (2021). Success of collaboration for sustainable agriculture: a case study meta-analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–23. Wallerstein, N., 和 Bernstein, E. (1994). Introduction to community empowerment, participatory education, and health (Vol. 21) (No. 2). Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA. Weiss, R. S. (1995). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. Simon and Schuster. Wynne-Jones, S., Hyland, J., Williams, P., 和 Chadwick, D. (2020). Collaboration for sustainable intensification: The underpinning role of social sustainability. Sociologia Ruralis, 60(1), 58–82. Zhang, Y., et al. (2018). Insights into chinese agriculture. Springer. Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American journal of community psychology, 23, 581–599. 中華民國合作事業協會. (2021). 中華民國 110 年合作事業統計年報. (引用自http://clc-coop.tw/publish/news.php?Sn=259) 中華民國四健會協會. (2023). 宗旨及目標. (引用自https://www.fourh.org.tw/ws.php?id=18) 交通部觀光局. (2020). Taiwan tourism 2030 台灣觀光政策白皮書. 倪葆真. (2003). 農民學院-農民訓練規劃與推動. 農政與農情. 倪葆真. (2006). 新農業運動-漂鳥計畫. 農政與農情. 內政部合作及人民團體司. (2023). 合作社問與答. (引用自https://coop.moi.gov.tw/cphp/aboutView/list7) 全國農業金庫. (2023). 成立沿革. (引用自https://www.agribank.com.tw/Page?itemid=1&mid=3) 劉進慶. (1992). 台灣戰後經濟分析 (Vol. 2). 人間出版社. 台中市政府農業局. (2016). 青年加農‧賢拜傳承計畫首屆結訓. (引用自https://www.taichung.gov.tw/980911/post) 吳建銘. (2016). 雲嘉南地區蔬菜產業青年農民經營管理之研究-以百大青農專案為例. 臺南區農業改良場研究彙報 (67), 90–106. 吳建銘, 李昱錡, 和 游詩妮. (2022). 以 ipa 績效分析法探討中部地區青農農產品加工打樣輔導需求之研究. 臺中區農業改良場特刊, 17–28. 吳恪元. (1987). 農業合作詞彙試釋. 農業推廣文彙, 25–28. 吳惠卿, 和 劉禎祺. (2017). 青年農民教育訓練成效評估之探討-以農試所農民學院訓練為例. 技術服務. 吳慈珮. (2011). 化險為夷, 轉災為福-農業風險與災害管理整合性新思維. 臺灣經濟研究月刊, 34(2), 45–51. 吳肇展, 鄭伃伶, 和 蕭士鈜. (2011). 台灣信用合作社治理之研究-公司治理觀點. 經營管理論叢, 55–70. 周開來. (2023). 中草藥契作模式財務分析 (Master’s thesis). 國立臺灣大學. 塩見直紀. (2014). 半農半 x という生き方. 姚成彥. (2015). 虛實整合: 特力屋電子商務的服務創新. 中山管理評論, 23(1), 377–409. 孟愛. (2012). 馬拉威婦女農民賦權競爭分析之研究 (Master’s thesis). 國立屏東科技大學. 孫維廷. (2015). 新世代青年農民培育. 農政與農情. 廖坤榮. (2004). 台灣農會的社會資本形成與政策績效. 政治科學論叢, 22, 181–220. 廖萬正. (1985). 桃與李之產期調節. 臺中區農業改良場特刊, 53–61. 張世潔, 和 王淑美. (2018). 我國農企群眾募資機制之發展與檢討. 農林學報, 66(3,4), 141–152. 張暐舜. (2014). 從臺灣農村民宿女主人談農村婦女的生命經驗與賦權 (Master’s thesis). 國立臺灣大學. 張雯勤, et al. (2003). 從旅行到田野研究: 談田野調查與參與觀察. In 質性研究方法與資料分析 (嘉義: 南華大學教育社會學研究所) (pp. 73–94). 南華大學教育社會學研究所. 張麗春, 和 李怡娟. (2004). 賦權概念分析. 護理雜誌, 51(2), 84–90. 戴登燦. (2010). 農產品包裝設計. 臺中區農業改良場特刊, 104–106. 方珍玲. (2014). 多項衡量指標評估青農輔導績效之研究—以青農專案輔導實施計畫為例. 行政院農委會科技計畫報告書. 施孟隆, 和 黃炳文. (2006). 臺灣農業發展與農業結構變遷之研究. 中華農學會報, 7(4), 324–342. 曾康綺, 和 張惠真. (2021). 關係連結, 合作聯盟對群聚效應之關聯性探討-以中部地區果樹青農為例. 臺中區農業改良場研究彙報,(150), 73–92. 曾康綺, 張惠真, 和 蔡本原. (2022). 青農人格特質, 關係連結對從農績效之影響—以中部地區果樹青農為例. 臺中區農業改良場研究彙報 (156), 75–100. 曾淑汾. (2007). 築夢踏實-園丁計畫辦理情形. 農政與農情. 李政錩. (2018). 在地女農崛起,跳脫傳統塑造新典範. 農政與農情. 東勢區農會. (2023). 組織架構圖. (引用自https://www.tsfa.org.tw/aboutus-16.html) 林淳華, 和 巫茂熾. (2021). 創新的小農: 以東勢高接梨產業為例. 庶民文化研究(24), 1–53. 林秀怡. (2016). 農民使用電子商務銷售農產品之影響因素分析 (Master’s thesis). 國立臺灣大學. 林金定, 嚴嘉楓, 和 陳美花. (2005). 質性研究方法: 訪談模式與實施步驟分析. 身心障礙研究季刊, 3(2), 122–136. 林錦宏. (2014). 公平貿易的理念與發展趨勢. 臺中區農業改良場特刊, 100–106. 楊欣佳. (2014). 培育新世代農業從業人員. 農政與農情. 楊舜臣, 方尚仁, 安寶貞, et al. (2007). 農業創新育成中心之研究. 技術服務. 楊長林, 陳妍伶, 徐承道, 和 簡毓儀. (2015). 台灣公平貿易之研究-公平貿易商店經營的困難與挑戰. 輔仁管理評論, 22(1), 75–93. 沈聰明. (2000). 觀光農園發展休閒農業經營策略之調適. 花蓮區農業專訊 (32), 10–12. 洪士峰. (2011). 《半農半 x 的生活: 順從自然, 實踐天賦》. 庶民文化研究 (3), 111–115. 王仕圖, 和 吳慧敏. (2005). 深度訪談與案例演練。載於齊力、林本炫(主編),質性研究方法與資料分析. 嘉義: 南華大學教育社會學研究所. 王俊雄, 陳尚蓉, et al. (2009). 輔導麻豆文旦柚農民秋節行銷之推廣研究. 農林學報, 58(3), 171–185. 盧永祥, 吳明峰, 許應哲, 和 張雅卿. (2013). 契約農業的夥伴關係之實證研究. 應用經濟論叢 (94), 113–153. 臺中市政府農業局. (2022). 臺中市 111 年青年農民輔導計畫. (引用自 https://youthfirst.yda.gov.tw/index.php/subject/content/969) 臺中市東勢區公所. (2021). 臺中市東勢區 110 年統計年報. 臺中: 東勢區公所. 臺中市東勢區公所. (2022). 臺中市東勢區 111 年統計年報. 臺中: 臺中市東勢區公所會計室. 范麗娟. (1994). 深度訪談簡介. 戶外遊憩研究, 7(2), 25–35. 莊彥輝, 和 陳毓璟. (2017). 新世代農民傳承農業知識學習歷程之研究-以彰化縣溪州鄉為例. 農業推廣文彙, 47–72. 葉守禮. (2021). 地方後勤網絡: 山城多樣化園藝農業的社會基礎與交換網絡. 台灣鄉村研究 (16), 87–133. 葉美智, 楊燿隆, 和 劉秋良. (2015). Open data 在生態旅遊加值上之應用. 台灣林業. 董時叡. (2013). 有機農產品行銷與農夫市集. 農業生技產業季刊 (32), 60–63. 蔡佳珊. (2016). 農民市集遍地開花全台 98 據點另類農食網絡. (引用自 https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/89715/) 蔡培慧. (2009). 農業結構轉型下的農民分化 (1980-2005) (Doctoral dissertation). 蔡培慧 2009 農業結構轉型下的農民分化. 蔡尚惪, 林瓊文, 曾喜育, 和 陳韋志. (2015). 古坑鄉華山地區之整合性鄉村旅遊分析. 林業研究季刊, 37(2), 117–131. 蔡晏霖. (2016). 農藝復興: 臺灣農業新浪潮. 文化研究 (22), 23–74. 蔡本原. (2013). 農產品展售陳列方式與技巧之介紹. 臺中區農業改良場一 一年專題討論專集 (116), 281. 蔡本原, 和 曾康綺. (2023). 中部地區蔬菜產業青年農民記帳輔導需求之研析. 臺中區農業改良場研究彙報 (158), 1–13. 蔣珮伊. (2016). 荒土上的青年耕者 (Master’s thesis). 國立臺灣大學. 蕭淑芬, 廖詳銘, 簡秋婷, 和 陳烈夫. (2019). 農業創新育成中心科研成果發表暨媒合會紀實與展望. 技術服務. 行政院農業委員會. (2023a). 農業經營現況. (引用自https://www.ey.gov.tw/state/CD050F4E4007084B/0ededcaf-8d80-428e-96b7-7c24feb4ea0d) 行政院農業委員會. (2023b). 農貸資訊. (引用自https://academy.coa.gov.tw/YF/list.php?id=910) 詹益昇. (2014). 微型金融的雙基線研究: 社會責任政策與借貸模式影響 (Doctoral dissertation). 國立臺灣大學. 財團法人農業科技研究院. (2023). 農業創新育成中心. (引用自 https://agri-incubators.atri.org.tw/index.php/about/range) 農委會. (2014). 以互信互利發展契作,創造生產與銷售的微笑曲線. Retrieved from https://www.abc,com (引用自https://www.coa.gov.tw/theme_data.php?theme=news&sub_theme=agri&id=5001) 農委會. (2015a). 全面啓動青農接班,正視農業人力世代交替危機-簡介韓國如何培育農業後繼者. (引用自https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=2502499) 農委會. (2015b). 規劃新世代農業工作者培育計畫. (引用自https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=2504689) 農委會. (2018). 發展群眾外包式 app 以輔助大量農地調查作業.(引用自 https://www.coa.gov.tw/office_epaper/epaper/infoexplorer/online/50/content_1.html) 農委會. (2021). 農業統計要覽. 台北: 行政院農業委員會. 農委會輔導處. (2023). 第 5 屆百大青農輔導計畫 faq. (引用自 https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=2504482) 農林水産省. (2023). 農地に関する統計. (引用自https://www.maff.go.jp/j/tokei/sihyo/data/10.html) 農業金融局. (2023). 專案農貸成效顯著充分支應從農者農業經營資金. (引用自 https://www.boaf.gov.tw/view.php?theme=news&subtheme=news&id=1315) 郭俊開. (2001). 觀光農園的發展與願景. 農政與農情. 鄭盈芷. (2010). 小農求生記——農夫市集在主流產銷體系下的機會與挑戰 (Master’s thesis). 國立臺灣大學. 鍾傅斌, 和 雷立芬. (2016). 桃園市青年農民聯誼會會員對組織績效之重視度與滿意度分析. 台灣農學會報, 17(2), 145–157. 阮光勛. (2014). 促進質性研究的品質與可信性. 國教新知, 61(1), 92–102. 陳建穎, 楊承叡, 和 黃仕嵩. (2019). 完善從農輔導體系培養新世代生力軍. 農政與農情. 陳玲岑. (2021). 農村特色家政班推動現況及輔導成果. 農政與農情. 陳瑞樺, et al. (2016). 以農之名: 臺灣戰後農運的歷史考察. 文化研究 (22), 75–122. 陳芬蕙, 和 何政坤. (2018). 除了木材, 其他永續經營的林產物. 林業研究專訊, 25(1), 17–21. 陳蓓真. (2014). 社區支持型農業在臺灣的發展概況. 臺中區農業改良場特刊, 283–286. 陸怡蕙, 蔡旻翰, 和 楊士昀. (2021). 團結力量大? 論農民組織對主力農家之經濟影響. 應用經濟論叢 (109), 1–39. 青年農民輔導平台. (2023). 在地青農-青年農民聯誼會. (引用自 https://academy.coa.gov.tw/YF/yf_local.php?&page=1) 黃仲杰. (2013). 臺灣在地食物網絡農夫市集的研究 (Master’s thesis). 國立臺灣大學. 黃如珍, 李允斐, 和 吳奕德. (2007). 臺灣現代返鄉務農現象之初探. 中興大學 2007農村規劃學術研討會. 黃慶鴻, 蕭崑杉, 方珍玲, 和 黃麗君. (2016). 青年農民推廣策略探討-以臺灣農業試驗/改良場所之推廣為例. 台灣農學會報, 17(1), 108–123. 黃炳文, 林秀霙, 林佩慧, 蔡永輝, 謝宜婷, 廖玟筑, 和 張羽萱. (2020). 有機農場農產品銷售通路及其選擇因素之研究: 以水稻, 雜糧, 特作及蔬菜為例. Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 67(3), 181–194. 黃秀美. (2017). 百大青農對政府現階段輔導措施滿意程度之分析 (Master’s thesis). 國立臺灣大學. 黃義. (2023). 臺灣返鄉與移居青年個人社會支持網絡研究 (Master’s thesis). 國立臺灣師範大學. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92103 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 作為農業後繼者,青農對於農業發展至關重要。近二十年來全球農業就業人口大幅減少,政府為吸引青年返鄉從農提出許多優惠政策與輔導措施。然而,青農返鄉後依舊可能由於面臨從農困境而導致離農,對此,青農需要透過行動突破困境以利長久留農。
本研究之研究目的在於探討青農返鄉留農的過程,青農透過行動突破從農困境是賦權的展現,透過青農賦權過程,得以理解當代青農所面臨的困境,以及可以透過哪些行動解決從農困境,行動是指從正式或非正式管道獲取從農資源,並在個別農場中利用從農資源以增加自身留農的可能性。相較於利用從農路徑來理解青農從農的各個階段,賦權過程紀錄著青農返鄉後的具體行動,以便理解青農農業事業的實質變化,更能具體呈現青農返鄉從農過程的真實狀態。 本研究之研究田野位於以種植高經濟價值作物聞名的臺中市東勢區,並以具有創新研發與團體合作精神的東勢青農作為本研究之受訪者。本研究採用深度訪談法搜集十位青農的賦權過程,並採用個案分析作為本研究之分析方法。 研究結果顯示了賦權過程可以具體呈現東勢青農具體的從農過程。東勢青農透過分散風險的經營管理策略、豐富的學習管道和拓展多種收入來源,解決產銷管理層面的困境;同時,為解決勞動力支持層面的困境,東勢青農需要動態調整產銷模式,並且找尋與建立當地的社會支持網絡;在面臨社會支持層面的困境時,青農採取行動緩和代間矛盾,並集結資源組建在地團體,建立在地的社會支持系統。本研究根據研究結果提出以下結論與建議:(一)青農賦權是持續的動態過程,青農建立固定的產銷模式後,藉由持續學習新的農業技術,突破現有的經營管理策略,以保障農場永續發展;(二)非正式協力可以視為青農從農資源之補充,團體合作的形式解決了個別農場的困境,提升了青農的留農條件與意願;(三)當代青農具有多樣化的產銷模式,然而,經驗不足的青農較難針對自身農場建立合適且永續的產銷模式,建議政府針對青農建立一套產銷管理輔導計畫,主動評估與追蹤每一位農業新進者農場經營管理狀況,並提供青農產銷建議與培訓課程,以協助青農建立能夠永續發展的產銷模式;(四)伴侶與家庭是青農留農的關鍵,建議未來可以增加提供青農伴侶與整個家庭社會支持之相關政策,協助青農家庭留鄉,增進青農長久留農之意願。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | As successors in agriculture, young farmers play a crucial role in the development of the agricultural sector. Over the past two decades, the global agricultural workforce has seen a significant decline, prompting governments to introduce various incentives and support measures to attract young individuals back to rural areas for farming. However, even upon returning to their hometowns, young farmers still face challenges in pursuing agriculture. To ensure long-term engagement in farming, young farmers need to take proactive actions to overcome these challenges.
This research aims to explore the process of young farmers transitioning from returning to persistently engaging in farming. The empowerment of young farmers through their actions is examined as a manifestation of overcoming challenges in agriculture. By understanding the empowerment process, the study seeks to identify the difficulties young farmers face in sustaining their involvement in agriculture in contemporary Taiwan and explore actions they can take to address these challenges. This includes accessing formal or informal channels for agricultural resources and how young farmers can utilize these resources on individual farms to increase the likelihood of persisting in farming. Unlike the conventional approach of understanding the stages of young farmers'' involvement in agriculture, the empowerment process documents specific actions taken by young farmers upon their return to comprehensively reflect the real conditions of their agricultural endeavors. The research was conducted in the Dongshi District of Taichung City, renowned for cultivating high-value crops. The study participants were innovative and collaboratively oriented young farmers from Dongshi. Deep interviews with ten young farmers were conducted, and case analysis was employed as the primary method of analysis. The research results demonstrate that the empowerment process can concretely depict the specific farming process of young farmers in Dongshi. Through decentralized risk management strategies, diverse learning channels, and the expansion of multiple income sources, young farmers in Dongshi address challenges at the production and marketing management levels. Simultaneously, to overcome difficulties in labor support, they need to dynamically adjust production and marketing models and establish local social support networks. Faced with challenges in social support, young farmers take actions to mitigate or avoid intergenerational conflicts, mobilize resources to form local groups, and establish local social support systems. Based on the research findings, the study proposes the following conclusions and suggestions: (1) Young farmer empowerment is a continuous dynamic process. After establishing a fixed production and marketing model, young farmers break through existing management strategies through continuous learning of new agricultural technologies to ensure the sustainable development of their farms. (2) Informal cooperation can be regarded as a supplement to young farmers'' agricultural resources. Cooperative forms of group collaboration solve individual farm challenges and enhance the conditions and willingness of young farmers to stay in agriculture. (3) Contemporary young farmers have diversified production and marketing models. However, due to their lack of experience, it is challenging for them to establish suitable and sustainable production and marketing models for their farms. The government is recommended to establish a production and marketing management guidance program for young farmers. Actively assessing and tracking the operational status of each new entrant in agriculture, providing production and marketing advice, and offering training courses to help young farmers establish sustainable production and marketing models. (4) Partners and family are crucial for young farmers to stay in agriculture. It is suggested that future policies increase support for the partners and entire families of young farmers, assisting in the retention of young farmer families in rural areas and enhancing the long-term willingness of young farmers to stay in agriculture. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-03-05T16:18:07Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-03-05T16:18:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
致謝 iii 摘要 vii Abstract ix 目次 xiii 圖次 xix 表次 xxi 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機............................. 1 1.2 研究目的與重要性............................ 6 第二章 文獻回顧 9 2.1 返鄉從農青年 .............................. 10 2.1.1 返鄉從農青年定義與內涵...................... 10 2.1.2 青年從農過程探究.......................... 14 2.1.3 青年從農困境定義與探討...................... 16 2.1.4 我國青年正式從農資源與獲取管道 ................ 19 2.1.5 青年非正式從農資源與獲取管道.................. 23 2.1.5.1 創新農業經營模式................... 23 2.1.5.2 非正式協力....................... 41 2.2 賦權.................................... 46 2.2.1 賦權的定義與內涵.......................... 46 2.2.2 農民賦權研究 ............................ 50 第三章 研究方法 53 3.1 資料搜集................................. 55 3.1.1 樣本選擇............................... 55 3.1.2 深度訪談法.............................. 56 3.2 研究田野................................. 58 3.2.1 東勢田野介紹 ............................ 58 3.2.2 東勢在地團體介紹.......................... 59 3.3 研究對象................................. 62 3.4 訪談大綱設計 .............................. 64 3.5 研究分析方法 .............................. 66 3.6 信效度檢測................................ 67 第四章 個案分析 69 4.1 A01青農返鄉從農過程之個案分析................... 70 4.1.1 農業知識技術學習與傳授...................... 70 4.1.2 農產品推廣與銷售.......................... 72 4.1.3 加值活動............................... 73 4.2 B02青農返鄉從農過程之個案分析................... 78 4.2.1 農業知識技術學習與傳授...................... 78 4.2.2 農產品推廣與銷售.......................... 80 4.2.3 加值活動............................... 83 4.3 C03青農返鄉從農過程之個案分析................... 85 4.3.1 農業知識技術學習與傳授...................... 85 4.3.2 農產品推廣與銷售.......................... 88 4.3.3 加值活動............................... 91 4.4 D04青農返鄉從農過程之個案分析................... 93 4.4.1 農業知識技術學習與傳授...................... 93 4.4.2 農產品推廣與銷售.......................... 95 4.4.3 加值活動............................... 95 4.5 E05青農返鄉從農過程之個案分析................... 97 4.5.1 農業知識技術學習與傳授...................... 97 4.5.2 農產品推廣與銷售.......................... 99 4.5.3 加值活動...............................100 4.6 F06 青農返鄉從農過程之個案分析...................101 4.6.1 農業知識技術學習與傳授......................101 4.6.2 農產品推廣與銷售/加值活動....................103 4.7 G07青農返鄉從農過程之個案分析................... 105 4.7.1 農業知識技術學習與傳授......................105 4.7.2 農產品推廣與銷售..........................107 4.7.3 加值活動...............................107 4.8 H08青農返鄉從農過程之個案分析................... 109 4.8.1 農業知識技術學習與傳授......................109 4.8.2 農產品推廣與銷售.......................... 111 4.8.3 加值活動...............................112 4.9 I09返鄉從農過程之個案分析...................... 113 4.9.1 農業知識技術學習與傳授...................... 113 4.9.2 農產品推廣與銷售.......................... 115 4.9.3 加值活動...............................116 4.10 J10青農返鄉從農過程之個案分析......................119 4.10.1農業知識技術學習與傳授.................. 119 4.10.2農產品推廣與銷售/加值活動 .................... 119 第五章 結果與討論 123 5.1 產銷管理困境與行動 ..........................123 5.1.1 從農困境一:農業高風險的產業特性...............123 5.1.2 從農困境二:缺乏農業知識技術與經驗..............124 5.1.3 從農困境三:經濟壓力加重 ....................126 5.1.4 突破從農困境的行動一:分散風險的經營管理策略.................... 127 5.1.4.1 採用避險的農業方法..................127 5.1.4.2 發展多元銷售模式...................127 5.1.5 突破從農困境的行動二:豐富的農業知識技術學習管道....................131 5.1.6 突破從農困境的行動三:拓展收入來源..............133 5.1.6.1 租地增加農作物產量..................133 5.1.6.2 兼職增加農業外收入..................134 5.1.6.3 發展加值活動......................135 5.2 勞動力支持困境與行動...................... 140 5.2.1 從農困境一:勞動密集工作造成的職業危害...........140 5.2.2 突破從農困境的行動一:動態調整產銷模式...........141 5.2.3 突破從農困境的行動二:找尋或建立當地社會支持網絡 ........142 5.3 社會支持困境與行動 ..........................144 5.3.1 從農困境一:情感責任與自主性相抵觸..............144 5.3.2 從農困境二:缺乏青農伴侶協力互助與親子資源............ 146 5.3.3 突破從農困境的行動一:緩和與避免代間矛盾.............. 148 5.3.4 突破從農困境的行動二:集結資源組建在地團體............ 150 第六章 結論與建議 151 6.1 結論.................................... 151 6.2 研究限制與未來研究方向........................ 154 參考文獻 155 附錄A—附錄 167 A.1 訪談大綱 ........................167 A.1.1 人口特性與返鄉原因 ........................167 A.1.2 農場業務 .......................... 167 A.1.3 農業協力類型 ............................168 A.1.4 農民特徵、認知與農業外發展.......................... 169 A.1.5 返鄉面臨的困境與突破.......................... 169 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 留農 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 返鄉青農 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 永續發展 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 從農資源 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 賦權 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Empowerment | en |
| dc.subject | Agricultural Resources | en |
| dc.subject | Sustainable Development | en |
| dc.subject | Retention on farm | en |
| dc.subject | U-turn Young Farmers | en |
| dc.title | 返鄉青農賦權過程之研究-以台灣東勢為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Empowerment Process of U-turn Young Farmers: A Case Study of Dongshi, Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳玠廷;王忠融 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Jie-Ting Chen;Chung-Jung Wang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 返鄉青農,留農,賦權,從農資源,永續發展, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | U-turn Young Farmers,Retention on farm,Empowerment,Agricultural Resources,Sustainable Development, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 170 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202400402 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-02-10 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 4.79 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
