請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92031完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張伯茹 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Po-Ju Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張宗琦 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Tsung-Chi Chang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-04T16:11:21Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-03-05 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-03-04 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-02-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 文化內容策進院. (2022) . 《2021年台灣文化內容產業調查報告》.
太東. (1978). Space Invaders [video game]. 太東. 任天堂. (2017). [CEDEC 2017ゼルダの伝説 ブレス オブ ザ ワイルド]. 4Gamer.net. https://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/screenshot.html?mode=thumbs 李政賢. (2018). 質性研究的五種取徑. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司. 范麗娟. (1994). 深度訪談簡介. 戶外遊憩研究, 7(2), 25-35. 張可婷（譯）. (2013). 質性研究分析法. Beoije, H. (2013). Analysis in qualitative researches. Los Angeles: SAGE. Aarseth, E. (2001a). Allegories of space. The question of spatiality in computer games. Aarseth, E. (2001b). Computer game studies, year one. Game studies, 1(1), 1-15. Adams, E. (2003, November). The Construction of Ludic Space. In DiGRA Conference. Álvarez, R., & Duarte, F. (2018). Spatial design and placemaking: learning from video games. Space and Culture, 21(3), 208-232. Álvarez, R., and F. Duarte. (2018). Spatial Design and Placemaking: Learning From Video Games. Space and Culture, 21(3): 208–232. Appleton, J. (1975). Landscape evaluation: the theoretical vacuum. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 120-123. Appleton, J. (1996). The experience of landscape. Chichester: Wiley Aronov, D., & Tank, D. W. (2014). Engagement of neural circuits underlying 2D spatial navigation in a rodent virtual reality system. Neuron, 84(2), 442-456. Avedon, E. M., & Sutton-Smith, B. (1971). The study of games. Barr, M., and A. Copeland-Stewart. (2021). Playing Video Games During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Effects on Players’ Well-Being. Games and Culture. Berlyne, D. E., & Boudewijns, W. J. (1971). Hedonic effects of uniformity in variety. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 25(3), 195. Bonner, M. (2014). Ambiguous Play Pattern: A Philosophical Approach to the Prospect-Refuge Theory in Urban Open World Games by Merging Deleuze/Guattari and de Certeau. space, 106, 108. Bonner, M. (2018). On Striated Wilderness and Prospect Pacing: Rural Open World Games as Liminal Spaces of the Man-Nature Dichotomy. DiGRA Conference. Bonner, M. (2021). Game| World| Architectonics: Transdisciplinary Approaches on Structures and Mechanics, Levels and Spaces, Aesthetics and Perception (p. 268). Heidelberg University Publishing (heiUP). Borowiecki, K. J., & Prieto-Rodriguez, J. (2014). Video games as cultural heritage: examining the opinions of scholars and heritage professionals. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 20(3), 312-331. Brockmyer, J. H., Fox, C. M., Curtiss, K. A., McBroom, E., Burkhart, K. M., & Pidruzny, J. N. (2009). The development of the Game Engagement Questionnaire: A measure of engagement in video game-playing. Journal of experimental social psychology, 45(4), 624-634. Calleja, G. (2011). In-game: From immersion to incorporation. mit Press. Chenoweth, R. (1984). Visitor employed photography: A potential tool for landscape architecture. Landscape Journal, 3(2), 136-143. Cherem, G. J., & Driver, B. L. (1983). Visitor employed photography: A technique to measure common perceptions of natural environments. Journal of Leisure Research, 15(1), 65-83. Christopher Kalanderopoulos. (2016). Full Zelda: Breath of the Wild map revealed: roughly 360 square kilometres. Eggplante. https://www.eggplante.com/2016/06/14/full-zelda-breath-of-the-wild-map-revealed-roughly-360-square-kilometres/ Cochrane, A., Prot, S., Blanco, J., Green, C. S., & Gentile, D. A. (2020). 15 Positive Effects of Video Gaming on Human Behavior. The Oxford Handbook of Digital Technologies and Mental Health, 157. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology, 13(1), 3-21. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications. Delhove, M., & Greitemeyer, T. (2020). The relationship between video game character preferences and aggressive and prosocial personality traits. Psychology of popular media, 9(1), 96. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. sage. Ermi, L., & Mäyrä, F. (2005, June). Fundamental components of the gameplay experience: Analysing immersion. In DiGRA Conference. Franceschini, S., Gori, S., Ruffino, M., Viola, S., Molteni, M., & Facoetti, A. (2013). Action video games make dyslexic children read better. Current biology, 23(6), 462-466. Franceschini, S., Trevisan, P., Ronconi, L., Bertoni, S., Colmar, S., Double, K., ... & Gori, S. (2017). Action video games improve reading abilities and visual-to-auditory attentional shifting in English-speaking children with dyslexia. Scientific reports, 7(1), 5863. Fullerton, T. (2014). Game design workshop: a playcentric approach to creating innovative games. CRC press. Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for People. Island Press. Granic, I., Lobel, A., & Engels, R. C. (2014). The benefits of playing video games. American psychologist, 69(1), 66. Guerrilla Games. (2017). Horizon: Zero Dawn [video game]. 索尼互動娛樂. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods, 18(1), 59-82. Hemenover, S. H., & Bowman, N. D. (2018). Video games, emotion, and emotion regulation: Expanding the scope. Annals of the International Communication Association, 42(2), 125-143. Hollweck, T. (2015). Robert K. Yin.(2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods . Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 30(1), 108-110. Hull, D. C., Williams, G. A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2013). Video game characteristics, happiness and flow as predictors of addiction among video game players: A pilot study. Journal of behavioral addictions, 2(3), 145-152. Hummon, D. M. (1992). Community attachment: Local sentiment and sense of place. In Place attachment (pp. 253-278). Boston, MA: Springer US. Ijsselsteijn, W., de Kort, Y., & Poels, K. (2013). The game experience questionnaire: Development of a self-report measure to assess the psychological impact of digital games. Media Psychology, 16(2), 289-311. Janik, J. (2020). Negotiating Textures of Digital Play: Gameplay and the Production of Space. Game Studies, 20(4). Jenkins, H. (2005). Games, the new lively art. Handbook of computer game studies, 175-189. Jennett, C., Cox, A. L., Cairns, P., Dhoparee, S., Epps, A., Tijs, T., & Walton, A. (2008). Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International journal of human-computer studies, 66(9), 641-661. Johnson, D., Gardner, M. J., & Perry, R. (2018). Validation of two game experience scales: the player experience of need satisfaction (PENS) and game experience questionnaire (GEQ). International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 118, 38-46. Kaplan, R., and Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge university press. Karhulahti, V. M. (2015). Defining the videogame. Game studies, 15(2). Karsenti, T., & Parent, S. (2020). Teaching history with the video game Assassin’s Creed: effective teaching practices and reported learning. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 14(1), 27-45. King, D. L., Delfabbro, P. H., Billieux, J., & Potenza, M. N. (2020). Problematic online gaming and the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of behavioral addictions, 9(2), 184-186. Klasen, M., Weber, R., Kircher, T. T., Mathiak, K. A., & Mathiak, K. (2012). Neural contributions to flow experience during video game playing. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 7(4), 485-495. Kunstler, J. H. (1994). Geography of nowhere: The rise and declineof america's man-made landscape. Simon and Schuster. Kyle, G. T., Mowen, A. J., & Tarrant, M. (2004). Linking place preferences with place meaning: An examination of the relationship between place motivation and place attachment. Journal of environmental psychology, 24(4), 439-454. LaValle, S. M., Yershova, A., Katsev, M., Antonov, M., & Dean, T. (2017). On evaluating virtual reality as a tool for presence in immersive games. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(4), 1302-1310. Lee, Y., & Chen, A. N. (2011). Usability design and psychological ownership of a virtual world. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(3), 269-308. Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years?. Journal of environmental psychology, 31(3), 207-230. Lewis Ward. (2022). data.ai and IDC Report Reveals that Mobile Extends Lead Over PC and Console as the Gaming Market is Set to Hit $222 Billion. International Data Corporation. https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS49166522 Long, Y. (2008). The relationships between objective and subjective evaluations of the urban environment: Space Syntax, cognitve maps, and urban legibility. MacKay, K. J., & Couldwell, C. M. (2004). Using visitor-employed photography to investigate destination image. Journal of Travel Research, 42(4), 390-396. Manero, B., Torrente, J., Fernandez-Vara, C., & Fernandez-Manjon, B. (2016). Investigating the impact of gaming habits, gender, and age on the effectiveness of an educational video game: An exploratory study. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(2), 236-246. Manero, B., Torrente, J., Freire, M., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2016). An instrument to build a gamer clustering framework according to gaming preferences and habits. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 353-363. Manovich, L. (2001). Post-media aesthetics. Transmedia frictions, the digital, the arts, and the humanities, 416. Martinez, L., Gimenes, M., & Lambert, E. (2022). Entertainment video games for academic learning: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(5), 1083-1109. McGregor, G. L. (2006, December). Architecture, space and gameplay in World of Warcraft and Battle for Middle Earth 2. In Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Game research and development (pp. 69-76). McGregor, G. L., & Akira, B. (2007, September). Situations of Play: Patterns of Spatial Use in Videogames. In DiGRA Conference. Mendenhall, Z., Saad, G., & Nepomuceno, M. V. (2010). Homo virtualensis: Evolutionary psychology as a tool for studying video games. Evolutionary psychology and information systems research: A new approach to studying the effects of modern technologies on human behavior, 305-328. Min, W., Mott, B. W., Rowe, J. P., Liu, B., and Lester, J. C. (2016). Player Goal Recognition in Open-World Digital Games with Long Short-Term Memory Networks. In IJCAI (pp. 2590-2596). Mochocki, M. (2021). Heritage sites and video games: Questions of authenticity and immersion. Games and culture, 16(8), 951-977. Murias, K., Kwok, K., Castillejo, A. G., Liu, I., and Iaria, G. (2016). The effects of video game use on performance in a virtual navigation task. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 398-406. Murray, J. H. (1997). Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. New York, Simon & Schuster/Free Press. Nintendo. (2017). The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild [video game]. 任天堂. Nitsche, M. (2008). Video game spaces: image, play, and structure in 3D worlds. MIT Press. Overby, A., & Jones, B. L. (2015). Virtual LEGOs: Incorporating Minecraft into the art education curriculum. Art Education, 68(1), 21-27. Pallavicini, F., Ferrari, A., & Mantovani, F. (2018). Video games for well-being: A systematic review on the application of computer games for cognitive and emotional training in the adult population. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 2127. Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health services research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189. Poels, K., De Kort, Y. A., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2012). Identification and categorization of digital game experiences: a qualitative study integrating theoretical insights and player perspectives. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 9(1), 107-129. Poole, S. (2000). Trigger happy: Videogames and the entertainment revolution. New York, NY: Arcade. Ravaja, N., Saari, T., Turpeinen, M., Laarni, J., Salminen, M., & Kivikangas, M. (2006). Spatial presence and emotions during video game playing: Does it matter with whom you play?. Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments, 15(4), 381-392. Riva, G., & Wiederhold, B. K. (2022). What the metaverse is (really) and why we need to know about it. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking, 25(6), 355-359. Roessel. (2014). On imitation and innovation in the games sector: From Pong to Ridiculous Fishing. Alexander von Humboldt. https://www.hiig.de/en/on-imitation-and-innovation-in-the-games-sector-from-pong-to-ridiculous-fishing-2/ Ryan, M. L. (2015). Narrative as virtual reality 2: Revisiting immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media. JHU press. Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and emotion, 30, 344-360. Saldaña, J. (2014). Coding and analysis strategies. Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2005). Game design and meaningful play. Handbook of computer game studies, 59, 79. Schell, J. (2008). The Art of Game Design: A book of lenses. CRC press. Schnaars, C. J. Taking a Breath of the Wild The Concept of Airness in Nintendo’s take on Open World Games. Game| World| Architectonics, 115. Shafer Jr, E. L., Hamilton Jr, J. F., & Schmidt, E. A. (1969). Natural landscape preferences: a predictive model. Journal of Leisure Research, 1(1), 1-19. Stenros, J. (2017). The game definition game: A review. Games and culture, 12(6), 499-520. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Sweetser, P., & Wyeth, P. (2005). GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 3(3), 3-3. Tekinbas, K. S., & Zimmerman, E. (2003). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT press. Totten, C. W. (2017). Level design: Processes and experiences. CRC Press. Tuan, Y. F. (1974). Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values. Prentice-Hall. Vidqvist, J. (2019). Open-World Game Design: case Study: The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild. Villani, D., Carissoli, C., Triberti, S., Marchetti, A., Gilli, G., & Riva, G. (2018). Videogames for emotion regulation: a systematic review. Games for health journal, 7(2), 85-99. Whitton, N. (2009). Learning with digital games: A practical guide to engaging students in higher education. Routledge. Wilkinson, B., Williams, N., & Armstrong, P. (2013). Improving student understanding, application and synthesis of computer programming concepts with Minecraft. In The European Conference on Technology in the Classroom. Wolf, M. J. (Ed.). (2002). The medium of the video game. University of Texas Press. Wu, J., & Holsapple, C. (2014). Imaginal and emotional experiences in pleasure-oriented IT usage: A hedonic consumption perspective. Information & Management, 51(1), 80-92. Zickerick, B., Thönes, S., Kobald, S. O., Wascher, E., Schneider, D., & Küper, K. (2020). Differential effects of interruptions and distractions on working memory processes in an ERP study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 84. Zimbardo, P. G., & Duncan, N. (2012). The demise of guys: Why boys are struggling and what we can do about it. TED Conferences, LLC. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92031 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 電玩遊戲為現今重要的休閒活動，隨著科技發展遊戲技術進步開放世界（Open world）成為現今主流的遊戲類型，本研究使用開放世界遊戲具代表性的《薩爾達傳說：曠野之息》作為研究工具。先前學者提出，電玩遊戲與空間設計、場所營造有相同的概念與本質，即創造人類與環境產生交互作用為基本價值。然而過往針對電子空間與景觀領域的研究並無探討虛擬的遊戲環境，故本研究欲深入探討電玩遊戲環境內的景觀空間與景觀偏好間的關係。究採用質性研究的扎根理論取逕，結合Visitor Employed Photography（VEP）和半結構式訪談收集資料並進行階段性編碼分析，最終共蒐集12名受訪者的127張照片與訪談資料。
本研究透過分析發現遊戲環境中影響偏好的三大核心範疇為景觀空間、遊戲體驗、景觀偏好，景觀空間元素包括人為景觀、自然景觀、遊戲元素及視覺因子，玩家體驗包括享受、想像沉浸、感官沉浸、懸疑感、緊張感、成就感、控制。景觀空間會影響玩家的遊戲體驗，而遊戲體驗會進一步影響到景觀偏好，故遊戲體驗可能在兩者間產生影響；而景觀空間若不涉及遊玩體驗，則對景觀偏好的作用及如同現實空間的。另有重要範疇個體差異，可能會產生調節景觀空間對遊戲體驗與景觀偏好間的關係，個體差異則有個人經驗與個性。另外本研究也發現，景觀空間範疇有代碼同屬於景觀元素與遊戲元素，這反映質性資料的多面性與兩者間的關係；可能受個體差異影響，導致玩家的參與度、沉浸感等而有不同。遊戲體驗的不同構面可能相似於景觀理論的內在感知反應過程，如緊張感反映眺匿理論；在本研究的遊戲體驗並未蒐集到過往研究中提及的心流，可能是由於研究方法的限制。 本研究不僅釐清電玩遊戲中的景觀空間、遊戲體驗和景觀偏好之間的關係，這些關係不僅反映在遊戲設計上，也體現在玩家的個體差異和內在感知過程中，同時也為遊戲設計與景觀領域提供了新的結合方式與方向。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Video gaming has become one of the important leisure activities in recent years. With the development of technology, open-world games have become mainstream. This study will use the classic open-world game The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild as a research tool. It shows parallels between video game environments and spatial design, emphasizing how both create interactive spaces for human experience. We explore the relationship between video games landscape space and landscape preferences, employing qualitative research, Grounded Theory, Visitor Employed Photography (VEP), and semi-structured interviews.
Analysis of 127 photos and interviews from 12 participants identified three core categories influencing preferences in gaming environments: landscape in video games, gaming experience, and landscape preference. Landscape in video games includes artificial and natural landscapes, game elements, and game elements. Gaming experience includes enjoyment, imaginative and sensory immersion, suspense, tension, achievement, and control. The gaming experience mediates the relationship between landscape in video games and landscape preference; if the landscape space doesn't involve gaming experience, its effect on preference is similar to that in real spaces. Individual differences, such as personal experiences and personality, also modulate these relationships. We find the multidimensionality of qualitative data and the interplay between landscape elements and game elements, which may vary based on individual differences, affecting engagement and immersion levels. It suggests that aspects of gaming experience may parallel concepts in landscape theories. The study's findings clarify the relationship between landscape in video games, gaming experience, and landscape preference, reflecting not only in game design but also in players' individual differences and internal perception processes. This offers new directions for integrating game design with the landscape architecture. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-03-04T16:11:20Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-03-04T16:11:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 表次 vi 圖次 vii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機與目的 3 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 開放世界遊戲 5 第二節 電玩遊戲體驗 10 第三節 景觀偏好與開放世界遊戲環境 13 第四節 遊戲環境元素 15 第五節 視覺因子 17 第三章 研究方法 19 第一節 研究流程 19 第二節 資料蒐集方法 22 第三節 訪客攝影法Visitor Employed Photography （VEP） 25 第四章 資料分析 31 第一節 資料彙整 32 第二節 開放性編碼 33 第三節 焦點編碼 37 第四節 選擇性編碼 50 第五章 理論模式討論 82 第一節 景觀空間與遊戲體驗對景觀偏好影響模式討論 82 第二節 研究限制與後續研究建議 97 參考文獻 99 附錄 106 附錄一、知情訪談同意書 106 附錄二、VEP所攝照片 107 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 遊戲空間 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 薩爾達傳說 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 訪客攝影法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Visitor Employed Photography | en |
| dc.subject | Game space | en |
| dc.subject | The Legend of Zelda | en |
| dc.title | 電玩遊戲景觀空間、遊戲體驗與景觀偏好之關係探討：以開放世界電玩遊戲為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Investigating the Relationship between Landscape in Video Game, Gaming Experience, and Landscape Preference: A Case Study of Open World Video Games | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張俊彥;歐聖榮;凃宏明 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chun-Yen Chang;Sheng-Jung Ou;Hung-Ming Tu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 遊戲空間,薩爾達傳說,訪客攝影法, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Game space,The Legend of Zelda,Visitor Employed Photography, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 120 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202400445 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-02-06 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2024-12-25 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-1.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 11.17 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。