請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91936完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張文貞 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Wen-Chen Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 方彥之 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Max Fang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-26T16:31:59Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-02-27 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-02-26 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2002-01-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Bibliography English Part Treatises and Chapters Anderson, T. L., & Leal, D. R. (2001). Free market environmentalism. London, England: Palgrave. Baur, D. C., Eichenberg, T., & Sutton, M. (Eds.). (2008). Ocean and coastal law and policy. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association. Breyer, S., Stewart, R., Sunstein, C., & Spitzer, M. L. (2002). Administrative law and regulatory policy: Problems, text, and cases (5th edition). New York, NY: Aspen Publishers. Cohen, J. (1997). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In William Rehg & James Bohman (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics (pp. 67-91). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Graham, P. A., & Wirth, H. H. (2010). Environmental law and policy: Nature, law and society, 4th edition. New York, New York: Aspen Publishers. Hubbard, P. (2009). NIMBY. In Rob Kitchin & Nigel Thrift (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 444-449). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. Jacobs, M. (1995). Sustainability and the market: A typology of environmental economics. In Robyn Eckersley (Eds.), Markets, the state, and the environment (pp. 47-69). Melbourne, Australia: Macmillan. Jennings, T., Tipper, H. A., Daglish, J., Grubb, M., & Drummond, P. (2020). Policy, innovation and cost reduction in UK offshore wind. London, England: The Carbon Trust. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Lee, J., & Zhao, F. (2021). Global offshore wind report 2021. Brussels, Belgium: Global Wind Energy Council. MacDonnell, L. J., & Bates, S. F. (Eds.). (2010). The evolution of natural resources law and policy. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association. McHarg, A., Barton, B., Bradbrook, A., & Godden, L. (Eds.). (2010). Property and the law in energy and natural resources. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Milton, K. (Eds.). (1993). Environmentalism: The view from anthropology. Abingdon, England: Routledge. Moran, A. (1995). Tools of environmental policy: Market instruments versus command-and-control. In Robyn Eckersley (Eds.), Markets, the state, and the environment (pp. 73-85). Melbourne, Australia: Macmillan. Percival, R. V., Schroeder, C. H., Miller, A. S., & Leape, J. P. (2009). Environmental regulation: Law, science, and policy (6th edition). New York, NY: Aspen Publishers. Plater, Z. J.B., Abrams, R. H., Graham, R. L., Heinzerling, L., Wirth, D. A., & Hall, N. D. (2010). Environmental law and policy: Nature, law, and society (4th edition). New York, NY: Aspen Publishers. Raymond, L. (2003). Private rights in public resources. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future. Rock, M., & Parsons, L. (2010). Offshore wind energy. Washington, D.C.: Environmental and Energy Study Institute. Stallworthy, M. (2002). Sustainability, land use and environment: A legal analysis. London, England: Cavendish Publishing Limited. Smil, V. (2017). Energy and civilization: A history. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Viñuales, J. E. (Eds.). (2015). The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development: A commentary. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Periodicals Allen, G., Connolly, K., McGregor, P., Ross, A. G. (2021). A new method to estimate the economic activity supported by offshore wind: A hypothetical extraction study for the United Kingdom. Wind Energy. 24, 887–900. Batt, J., & Short, D. C. (1993). The jurisprudence of the 1992 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development: A law, science, and policy explication of certain aspects of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. Journal of Natural Resources & Environmental Law, 8(2), 229-292. Bell, D, Gray, T., & Haggett, C. (2005). The ‘social gap’ in wind farm siting decisions: Explanations and policy responses. Environmental Politics, 14(4), 460-477. Blumm, M. C. (2010). The public trust doctrine and private property: The accommodation principle. Pace Environmental Law Review, 27(3), 649-667. Campbell, M. S., Stehfest, K. M., Votier, S. C., & Hall-Spencer, J. M. (2014). Mapping fisheries for marine spatial planning: Gear-specific Vessel Monitoring System (VMS), marine conservation and offshore renewable energy. Marine Policy, 45, 293-300. Carr-Harris, A., & Lang, C. (2019). Sustainability and tourism: The effect of the United States first offshore wind farm on the vacation rental market. Resource and Energy Economics, 57, 51-67. Chen, J., Liu, H., & Chaung, C. (2015). Strategic planning to reduce conflicts for offshore wind development in Taiwan: A social marketing perspective. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 99, 195-206. Chen, J., Liu, H., Chaung, C., & Lu, H. (2015). The factors affecting stakeholders’ acceptance of offshore wind farms along the western coast of Taiwan: Evidence from stakeholders’ perceptions. Ocean & Coastal Management, 109, 40-50. Crabtree, C. J., Zappala, D., & Hogg, S. I. (2015). Wind energy: UK experiences and offshore operational challenges. Journal of Power and Energy, 229(7), 727–746. de Groot, J., Campbell, M., Ashley, M., & Rodwell, L. (2014). Investigating the co-existence of fisheries and offshore renewable energy in the UK: Identifications of a mitigation agenda for fishing effort displacement. Ocean & Coastal Management, 102, 7-18. Frank, R. M. (2012). The public trust doctrine: Assessing its recent past & charting its future. UC Davis Law Review, 45, 665-691. Graziano, M., Lecca, P., & Musso, M. (2017). Historic paths and future expectations - The macroeconomic impacts of the offshore wind technologies in the UK. Energy Policy, 108, 715-730. Gupta, J. (2016). Climate change governance history, future, and triple-loop learning? WIREs Climate Change, 7(2), 192-210. Hale, T., & Roger, C. (2014). Orchestration and transnational climate governance. The Review of International Organizations, 9, 59–82. Jansen, M., Duffy, C., Green, T. C., & Staffell, I. (2022). Island in the sea: The prospects and impacts of an offshore wind power hub in the North Sea. Advances in Applied Energy, 6(100090), 1-14. Kern, F., Smith, A., Shaw, C., Raven, R., & Verhees, B. (2014). From laggard to leader: Explaining offshore wind developments in the UK. Energy Policy, 69, 635-646. Klass, A. B. (2006). Modern public trust principles: Recognizing rights and integrating standards. Notre Dame Law Review, 82, 699-754. Klass, A. B. (2012). Renewable energy and the public trust doctrine. UC Davis Law Review, 45(3), 1021-1074. Lazarus, R. J. (1986). Changing conceptions of property and sovereignty in natural resources law: Questioning the public trust doctrine. Iowa Law Review, 71, 631-716. Leary, D., & Esteban, M. (2009). Climate change and renewable energy from the ocean and tides: Calming the sea of regulatory uncertainty. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 24(4), 617-651. Merino, R. (2018). Re-politicizing participation or reframing environmental governance? Beyond indigenous’ prior consultation and citizen participation. World Development, 111, 75-83. Mitchell, C., & Connor, P. (2004). Renewable energy policy in the UK 1990–2003. Energy Policy, 32(17), 1935–1947. Mitchell, C., Connor, P., & Bauknecht, D. (2006). Effectiveness through risk reduction: A comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany. Energy Policy, 34(3), 297–305. Pappas, M. (2018). Disclaiming property. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 41, 391-451. Popovic, N. (1993). The right to participate in decisions that affect the environment. Pace Environmental Law Review, 10, 683–708. Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: In search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science, 14 (3), 681–695. Sax, J. L. (1970). The public trust doctrine in natural resource law: Effective judicial intervention. Michigan Law Review, 68, 471-567. Sun, H. (2011). Toward a new social-political theory of the public trust doctrine. Vermont Law Review, 35(3), 563-622. Toke, D. (2002). Wind power in UK and Denmark: Can rational choice help explain different outcomes? Environmental Politics, 11, 83–100. Toke, D. (2005) Explaining wind power planning outcomes – some findings from a study in England and Wales. Energy Policy, 33(12), 1527 – 1539. Toke, D. (2011). The UK offshore wind power programme: A sea-change in UK energy policy? Energy Policy, 39, 526-534. Vining, A. R., & Weimer, D. L. (2016). The challenges of fractionalized property rights in public-private hybrid organizations: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Regulation & Governance, 10(2), 161-178. Williams, C., & Millington, A. C. (2004). The diverse and contested meanings of sustainable development. The Geographical Journal, 170(2), 99-104. Wirth, D. A. (1995). The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development: Two steps forward and one back, or vice versa. Georgia Law Review, 29, 599-653. Yates, K., Schoeman, D. S., & Klein, C. J. (2015). Ocean zoning for conservation, fisheries and marine renewable energy: Assessing trade-offs and co-location opportunities. Journal of Environmental Management, 152, 201-209. Laws and Court Decisions The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Electricity Act 1989, 1989 c. 29. (1989). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/29/contents The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Utilities Act 2000, 2000 c. 27. (2000). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/27/contents The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Energy Act 2004, 2004 c. 20. (2004). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/20/contents The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Climate Change Act 2008, 2008 c. 27. (2008). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/27/contents The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009, 2009 c. 23. (2009). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/23/contents The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Energy Act 2013, 2013 c. 32. (2013). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/32/contents The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Energy Act 2016, 2016 c. 20. (2016). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2016/20/contents/enacted The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The Climate Change Act 2008 (2050 Target Amendment) Order 2019, 2019 No. 1056. (2019). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2019/1056/contents/made The Scottish Parliament. Climate Change (Emissions Reduction Targets) (Scotland) Act 2019, 2019 asp 15. (2019). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2019/15/enacted United States of America. Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7401 et seq. (1990). https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/clean-air-act-text United States of America. U.S. Const. amend. V. (1791). https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-5/ United States of America. U.S. Const. amend. XIV. (1868). https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-14/ Arnold v. Mundy, 6 N.J.L. 1 (N.J. 1821). Martin v. Waddell, 41 U.S. 367 (1842). Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Illinois, 146 U.S. 387 (1892). Shively v. Bowlby, 152 U.S. 1 (1894). People v. Zankich, 20 Cal. App. 3d 971 (1971) National Audubon Society v. Superior Court of Alpine County, 658 P.2d 709 (Cal. 1983). Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992). Ventura County Commercial Fishermen Association v. California Fish and Game Commission, No. B166335, 2004 WL 293565 (Cal. App. 2d Feb. 17, 2004). Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, Inc. v. Energy Facilities Siting Board, 858 N.E. 2d 294 (Mass. 2006). Moot v. Department of Environmental Protection, 861 N.E. 2d 410 (Mass. 2007). Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, Inc. v. Energy Facilities Siting Board, 932 N.E. 2d 787 (Mass. 2010). International Legal Documents Agenda 2030. (Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015). A/RES/70/1. October 21, 2015. Agenda 21. U.N. Doc. A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. II). June 13, 1992. Declaration on the Right to Development. U.N. Doc. A/RES/41/128. December 04, 1986. EU Renewable Energy Directive. Document 32009L0028; Directive 2009/28/EC. April 23, 2009. Glasgow Climate Pact. U.N. Doc. FCCC/PA/CMA/2021/L.16. November 13, 2021. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 993 U.N.T.S. 3; S. Exec. Doc. D, 95-2 (1978); S. Treaty Doc. No. 95-19; 6 I.L.M. 360 (1967). December 16, 1966. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 37 I.L.M. 22 (1998); 2303 U.N.T.S. 148; U.N. Doc. FCCC/CP/1997/7/Add.1. December 10, 1997. Paris Agreement (Conference of the Parties, Adoption of the Paris Agreement). U.N. Doc. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev/1 (Dec. 12, 2015). December 12, 2015. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. 31 I.L.M. 874 (1992); U.N. Doc. A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I). June 13, 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 1771 U.N.T.S. 107, 165; S. Treaty Doc No. 102-38 (1992); U.N. Doc. A/AC.237/18 (Part II)/Add.1; 31 I.L.M. 849 (1992). May 9, 1992. Government Publications and Reports Catapult. (2019). Guide to an offshore wind farm: Updated and extended. The Crown Estate. https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/media/2860/guide-to-offshore-wind-farm-2019.pdf Feigenbaum, E. A., & Hou, J. (2020). Overcoming Taiwan's Energy Trilemma. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/04/27/overcoming-taiwan-s-energy-trilemma-pub-81645 HM Government. (2013). Offshore wind industrial strategy: Business and government action. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/243987/bis-13-1092-offshore-wind-industrial-strategy.pdf HM Government. (2019). Industrial strategy: Offshore wind sector deal. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/786279/BEIS_Offshore_Wind_sector_deal_print_ready.pdf HM Government. (2021). Net zero strategy: Build back greener. Presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 14 of the Climate Change Act 2008. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1033990/net-zero-strategy-beis.pdf Natural Resource Governance Institute. (2015). Local content: Strengthening the local economy and workforce. https://resourcegovernance.org/sites/default/files/nrgi_Local-Content.pdf Offshore Wind Industry Council. (2018). Offshore wind industry prospectus. https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.renewableuk.com/resource/resmgr/publications/catapult_prospectus_final.pdf Rowe, J., Payne, A., Williams, A., O’Sullivan, D., & Morandi, A. (2017). Phased approaches to offshore wind developments and use of project design envelope: Final technical report. U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Office of Renewable Energy Programs. https://www.boem.gov/sites/default/files/environmental-stewardship/Environmental-Studies/Renewable-Energy/Phased-Approaches-to-Offshore-Wind-Developments-and-Use-of-Project-Design-Envelope.pdf The Crown Estate. (2019). Information memorandum: Introducing Offshore Wind Leasing Round 4. https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/media/3378/tce-r4-information-memorandum.pdf The Crown Estate. (2019). Offshore Wind Leasing Round 4 Summary stakeholder feedback report. https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/media/3332/tce-r4-summary-stakeholder-feedback-report.pdf The Crown Estate. (2020). Offshore Wind Leasing Round 4: Innovation discount policy. https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/media/3628/innovation-discount-policy-document.pdf The Crown Estate. (2021). Offshore Wind Leasing Round 4: Delivering a low carbon future. https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/media/3921/guide-to-offshore-wind-leasing-round-4.pdf The Crown Estate. (n.d.). UK Offshore Wind Development Pipeline. https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/media/3706/overview-of-uk-offshore-wind-development-pipeline.pdf UK Department of Trade and Industry. (2007). Meeting the energy challenge: A White Paper on energy. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/243268/7124.pdf UN World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf Theses and Dissertations Wilson, J. C. (2007). Offshore wind farms: Their impacts, and potential habitat gains as artificial reefs, in particular for fish. [Unpublished master’s thesis] (being a dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of MSc in Estuarine and Coastal Science and Management). University of Hull. Online Resources Deepwater Wind. (n.d.). America’s first offshore wind farm powers up. https://dwwind.com/press/americas-first-offshore-wind-farm-powers/ HM Government. (November 29, 2011). Guidance: Centres for Offshore Renewable Engineering. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/centres-for-offshore-renewable-engineering?fbclid=IwAR0GIowbJsrVFMgapyI_Fr-2-lFTnVmdim8e8SNyAmzHudp6vxNqg7q67AE HM Government. (December 30, 2011). Statutory guidance: UK marine policy statement. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-marine-policy-statement Msimang, A., & Doble, M. (October 26, 2008). Round 3 of the UK Offshore Wind Programme. https://www.martindale.com/legal-news/article_vinson-elkins-llp_535588.htm Taiwan Executive Yuan Department of Information Services. (June 13, 2019). Offshore wind-power generation. https://english.ey.gov.tw/News3/9E5540D592A5FECD/34ff3d6b-412e-458d-afe9-01737d2da52d The Crown Estate. (n.d.). The Fishing Liaison with Offshore Wind and Wet Renewables Group. https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/en-gb/what-we-do/on-the-seabed/our-partnerships/the-fishing-liaison-with-offshore-wind-and-wet-renewables-group/ The Crown Estate. (n.d.). Offshore Wind Leasing Round 4: Unlocking new areas of seabed for the generation of low carbon energy for millions more homes by 2030. https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/round-4/#:~:text=Offshore%20Wind%20Leasing%20Round%204%20creates%20the%20opportunity%20for%20at,to%20net%20zero%20by%202050 The White House. (March 29, 2021). Fact sheet: Biden Administration jumpstarts offshore wind energy projects to create jobs. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/29/fact-sheet-biden-administration-jumpstarts-offshore-wind-energy-projects-to-create-jobs/ Mandarin Part Treatises and Chapters 丘昌泰、黃錦堂、湯京平、洪鴻智、黃躍雯, 2006,《解析鄰避情結與政治》, 臺北: 翰蘆。 周桂田、張國暉, 2017,《【能】怎麼轉：啟動臺灣能源轉型鑰匙》, 臺北: 巨流。 陳芙靜、李孟諺, 2010,《全球離岸風力發電市場前景分析》, 臺北: 經濟部技術處。 陳恆鈞, 2012,《治理互賴理論與實務》, 臺北: 五南。 陳敏, 2016,《行政法總論》，第九版，臺北: 作者自版。 黃異, 2018,《漁業法》, 臺北: 新學林。 葉俊榮, 1997a,《環境行政的正當法律程序》, 再版, 臺北: 三民。 葉俊榮, 1997b,《環境理性與制度抉擇》, 臺北: 三民。 葉俊榮, 2002,《環境政策與法律》, 臺北: 元照。 葉俊榮, 2015,《氣候變遷治理與法律》, 臺北: 國立臺灣大學出版中心。 葉俊榮、張文貞、林春元 (編), 2020,《建構氣候轉型立法: 比較立法與議題論述》, 臺北: 新學林。 饒瑞正 (編), 2021,《離岸風電的政策、法律、經濟與風險》, 臺北: 元照。 Clark, C., & Tan, A. C. (著); 劉詩芃 等 (譯), 2016,《台灣政治經濟學》, 臺北: 五南。 Periodicals 林明照、陳盟仁、林錦章、吳清木, 2006,〈風力發電站專案分析〉,《工程科技與教育學刊》, 第3卷第3期, 頁322-340。 范建得, 2009, 〈美國及西班牙推廣風力發電經驗於我國之借鏡〉,《臺灣科技法律與政策論叢》, 第6卷第1期, 頁193-235。 邱文彥, 2019,〈從海洋政策觀點論臺灣離岸風場之發展〉,《國家發展研究》, 第18卷第2期, 頁55-124。 徐力平、林新華, 2019, 〈英國離岸風電本土產業鏈發展經驗〉,《營建知訊》, 第433期, 頁24-27。 徐昕煒, 2014,〈英國離岸風電產業策略與我國借鏡〉,《臺灣經濟研究月刊》, 第 37卷第4期, 頁119-126。 陳中舜, 2018,〈臺灣風電產業的回顧與展望〉,《經濟前瞻》, 第179期, 頁117-122。 張文貞, 2012,〈NGO與跨國憲政主義的發展: 以台灣加入國際人權公約的實踐為例〉,《臺灣國際法季刊》, 第9期第3號, 頁47-72。 Laws and Court Decisions 臺灣,《中華民國憲法》, 國民政府令. (1947). https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=A0000001 臺灣,《環境基本法》, 總統華總一義字第 09100238990 號令 (last amend.). (2002). https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=O0100001 臺灣,《環境影響評估法》, 總統華總一義字第 09100255720 號令 (last amend.). (2003). https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=O0090001 臺灣,《海岸管理法》, 總統華總一義字第 10400012591 號令. (2015). https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0070222 臺灣,《漁業法》, 總統華總一經字第 10700140851 號令 (last amend.). (2018). https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=M0050001 臺灣,《國有財產法》, 總統華總一經字第 10700125391 號令 (last amend.). (2018). https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=G0370001 臺灣,《電業法》, 總統華總一經字第 10800050761 號令 (last amend.). (2019). https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawHistory.aspx?pcode=j0030011 臺灣,《水利法》, 總統華總一經字第 11000049221 號 (last amend.). (2021). https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=J0110001 臺灣,《再生能源發展條例》, 總統華總一義字第 09800166471 號令. (2009). https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=j0130032 行政院環境保護署,〈政府政策環境影響評估作業辦法〉, 行政院環境保護署環署綜字第 0950021971 號令. (2006). https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=O0090029 行政院農業委員會,〈離岸式風力發電廠漁業補償基準〉, 農漁字第1051328879A號令. (2017). https://law.coa.gov.tw/GLRSnewsout/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000773 經濟部,〈風力發電示範系統設置補助辦法〉, 經濟部（89）經能字第 89314400 號令. (2000). https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=J0130022 經濟部,〈風力發電離岸系統示範獎勵辦法〉(currently the“〈離岸風力發電示範獎勵辦法〉”), 經濟部經能字第 10104604190 號令. (2012). https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=J0130063 經濟部,〈電力開發協助金運用與監督管理辦法〉, 經濟部經能字第 11104601780 號令 (last amend.). (2022). https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=J0130087 司法院,《司法院大法官釋字第400號解釋》. (1996). https://cons.judicial.gov.tw/docdata.aspx?fid=100&id=310581&rn=11026 Government Publications and Reports 行政院環境保護署, 2016,《環境影響評估審查委員會第306次會議議程》。 https://doc.epa.gov.tw/IFDEWebBBS_EPA/Download.ashx?Guid=a8da6306-f9df-4a89-a326-70b6a1f37ffa&type=306%E6%AC%A1%E6%9C%83%E8%AD%B0%E9%96%8B%E6%9C%83%E9%80%9A%E7%9F%A5_%E9%99%84%E4%BB%B6.pdf 交通部, 2017,《離岸風電海下工程技術研發計畫(106-109 年)(核定本)》。https://www.iot.gov.tw/dl-17424-7973b995c28a4581ba5d4cdb1d6365cd.html 經濟部能源局, 2017,《風力發電4年推動計畫(核定本)》。https://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/ECW/populace/content/wHandMenuFile.ashx?menu_id=5493&file_id=4107 施信民 (計畫主持人), 2002,《再生能源與其相關產業之發展策略研究》(行政院經濟建設委員會九十一年度委託研究計畫: PG 91060627; 研究單位: 台灣二十一世紀議程協會)。https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/001/administrator/10/relfile/5657/4222/0008954.pdf Theses and Dissertations 黃嘉偉, 2020,〈政策支持與產業發展之關聯性研究—以我國風力發電產業為例〉, 國立臺灣大學社會科學院國家發展研究所碩士論文。 葉進雄，2007，〈我國漁業管理法制之研究〉，國立臺灣海洋大學海洋法律研究所碩士學位論文。 張睿寧, 2021,〈制度及場域的不對稱邏輯: 我國離岸風場環評與漁業補償關聯的發展與變遷〉, 國立臺灣大學社會科學院國家發展研究所碩士論文。 Online Resources 公共政策網路參與平台, 2021,〈經濟部公告：預告「電力開發協助金運用與監督管理辦法」第6條之1、第9條及第7條附表修正草案〉, https://join.gov.tw/policies/detail/8e06614f-6ba1-4cda-aaa6-210285cb661e 台灣風力發電產業學會, 2013,〈竹南離岸風力發電計畫 首次環評出師不利〉, http://www.twtia.org.tw/Industry_List_m.aspx?id=4380 台灣環境資訊協會環境資訊中心, 27 September 2017,〈都是為了錢? 離岸風機帶動漁村共榮? 彰化漁會觀點〉, https://e-info.org.tw/node/207497 自由時報, 28 July 2015,〈離岸風力發電施工 80艘漁船抗議〉, https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/local/paper/901562 行政院農業委員會水產試驗所, 21 February 2017, 〈離岸風機海藻牧場設置之可行性研究〉, https://www.tfrin.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=226&s=231694 行政院, 2019,〈全力推動離岸風電—打造台灣成為亞洲離岸風電技術產業聚落〉, https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/9eebb9b8-490b-4357-963f-a48a981852a7 行政院農業委員會水產試驗所, 12 April 2019,〈水產試驗所研發離岸風電與漁業共享海域之新模式〉, https://www.tfrin.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=241&s=54717 孫文臨, 28 December 2020, 〈北海岸建離岸風電 學者估影響台灣七成漁獲 漁民: 反對到底〉, https://e-info.org.tw/node/228767 彭杏珠, 28 June 2016, 〈漁業權補償金喬不攏 離岸風電恐難產〉, https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/21954 經濟部能源局, 2021, 〈108_109年度全國電力資源供需報告〉, https://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/ECW/populace/content/ContentLink2.aspx?menu_id=48&sub_menu_id=8749 經濟部能源局, n.d., 〈10-5 發電結構(一)〉, https://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/ECW/populace/web_book/wHandWebReports_File.ashx?type=office&book_code=M_CH&chapter_code=K&report_code=11 蔡佳珊、程怡綾, 31 July 2021, 〈08 越洋專訪》借鏡英國經驗, 首重海洋空間規劃, 保障公民參與〉, https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/155678/ Japanese Part Treatises and Chapters 北村 喜宣『現代環境規制法論』(上智大学出版、2018年)。 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91936 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文致力於研究基於永續原則的發展活動是如何導致社會衝突以致於拖累邁向永續社會的努力。本文主張公共信託理論的精神需要被具體實踐以消弭其在國家層次與地方層次上公共利益的巨大落差。本研究比較並分析臺灣與英國在離岸風力發電發展上的案例, 基於離岸風電發展具有基於永續原則的發展活動的主要特徵: 政府主導的開發計畫為了達成能源轉型上的政策目標; 以永續發展為理由而進行在行政管制面上的政策變遷; 以及互相衝突的公共利益與個人權益。本文將此研究分為四個主要層面進行討論: 政策偏好與政治取向, 整體量能, 公共治理, 以及權利衝突。經過研究, 本文發現臺灣政府應扮演更加積極的角色, 在離岸風場規劃過程中協調並降低衝突。本文建議臺灣應進行並落實在漁業資源管理的行政管制變革, 並將公共信託理論作為永續原則的政策考量納入法律政策當中以拉近管制國家與實際社會之間的距離。基於以上, 本研究的主要貢獻為提供一個可行的政策框架, 以面對並解決長期存在的政治社會問題–各方利害關係人基於海洋公共資源的權利衝突, 並進一步加速整體社會在永續發展架構下的能源轉型過程。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This is a thesis about how sustainable development activities give rise to the social conflict that may hinder the efforts on the path toward sustainability. The thesis maintains that the concept of public trust should be substantiated in response to the gap between local interests and public interests at national level. The research will conduct comparative analysis on cases in Taiwan and the United Kingdom and provide observations focusing on the topic of offshore wind development since it bears prominent characteristics of sustainable development activities: government-led development projects induced by policy goals on energy transitions, regulation-oriented policy changes in the name of sustainable development, and conflicting values between public and individual interests. After researching the topic of offshore wind development in Taiwan and the UK in four dimensions–policy preferences and political attitudes, national capacity, governance, and the conflict of right, the thesis found that the Taiwanese government should play a more active role in coordinating and reconciling the conflict during the leasing process. The thesis holds that an overhaul to the current Taiwanese regulatory regime on fish resource management needs to be taken into action, and suggests that the public trust as a consideration to sustainability is a missing piece in the legal policy and that it would help bridge the gap between the regulatory state and society. The primary contribution of the thesis is to provide a viable policy framework in order to resolve the long existing socio-political conundrum due to the conflict of rights and interests among stakeholders over natural resources at sea, and thus catalyze energy transitions within the context of sustainable development. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-02-26T16:31:59Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-02-26T16:31:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents Abstract.…………………………………………….……………………………………………..1 Table of Contents…………………………………….……………………………………………2 Chapter 1: Introduction..…………………………………………………………………………..4 Chapter 2: Offshore Wind in Taiwan ……………………………………………………………14 A Policy Preferences and Political Attitudes ………………………………………….15 B National Capacity ...…………………………………………………………………18 C Governance ……………………………………………………………………….....20 D The Conflict of Rights ………………………………………………………………24 1. Taiwan’s Fisheries and the Public Trust Theory ……………………………...29 2. Taiwanese Problems …………………………………………………………..31 Chapter 3: Offshore Wind in the UK ……………………………………………………………37 A Policy Preferences and Political Attitudes ………………………………………….37 B National Capacity …………………………………………………………………...42 C Governance ………………………………………………………………………….45 D The Conflict of Rights ………………………………………………………………48 1. UK Fisheries and the Licensed Property..……………………………………..48 2. The British Solution …………………………………………………………..52 Chapter 4: Policy Analysis ………………………………………………………………………55 A An Overview………………………………………………………………………...56 B Similar Preferences, Different Governance.............…..…..…..…..…..…..…...........58 C Similar Paths, Different Approaches ………………………………………………..60 D Explaining the Conflict of Rights …………………………………………………..62 E The Privatization of Fish Resources ………………………………………………...64 F The Nature of Fishing Rights in Taiwan …………………………………………….64 G The Role of Public Trust Theory in Policy-making ………………………………...66 H Potential Public Policy Agendas ……………………………………………………70 Chapter 5: Conclusion …………………………………………………………………….……..73 A In the Name of Sustainable Development ………………………………….……….73 B Taiwan Compared to the United Kingdom …………………………………………74 C The Role of Public Trust in Taiwan ………………………………………………...76 D The Future with the Local Community ……..……………………………………....77 Bibliography .…..…………..…..…..…..…..…..…..…..….……………………………..….…..81 English Part………………………………………………………………………………81 Mandarin Part…………….……………………………………………………………...88 Japanese Part……………………………………………………………………………..91 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 離岸風力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 基於永續原則的發展活動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 漁業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 公共信託理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 氣候變遷 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 永續原則 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | climate change | en |
| dc.subject | fisheries | en |
| dc.subject | public trust | en |
| dc.subject | sustainability | en |
| dc.subject | offshore wind energy | en |
| dc.subject | sustainable development activities | en |
| dc.title | 永續發展脈絡下的能源轉型、權利衝突與公共信託–比較臺灣與英國之離岸風電發展 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Energy Transitions, Conflict of Rights and Public Trust in Sustainable Development–Comparing Offshore Wind Power Developments in the UK and Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林春元;林子倫 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chun-Yuan Lin;Tze-Luen Lin | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 離岸風力,基於永續原則的發展活動,漁業,公共信託理論,氣候變遷,永續原則, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | offshore wind energy,sustainable development activities,fisheries,public trust,climate change,sustainability, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 91 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202203716 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-09-26 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程(含碩士班、博士班) | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-110-2.pdf | 1.26 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。