Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91747
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor蔡彥卿zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorYann-Ching Tsaien
dc.contributor.author王思勻zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorSsu-Yun Wangen
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-22T16:32:11Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-23-
dc.date.copyright2024-02-22-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.date.submitted2024-01-26-
dc.identifier.citationBall, R., & Brown, P. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 159-178.
Bengio, Y., Simard, P., & Frasconi, P. (1994). Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks., 5(2), 157-166.
Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Maching Learning, 45(1), 5-32.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). The business of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Review.
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining,
Chien, H. F. (1998). The information content of monthly sales announcements. [Doctoral’s Thesis, National Taiwan University].
Chiu, L. S. (2020). The stock price effect of company’s monthly revenue announcements. [Master’s Thesis, National Chengchi University].
Choi, H., & Varian, H. (2012). Predicting the present with Google Trends. The Economic Record, 88(1), 2-9.
Cleveland, R. B., Cleveland, W. S., McRae, J. E., & Terpenning, I. (1990). STL: A seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based on loess. Journal of Official Statistics, 6(1), 3–73.
Da, Z., Engelberg, J., & Gao, P. (2015). The sum of all FEARS investor sentiment and asset prices. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(1), 1-32.
De Myttenaere, A., Golden, B., Le Grand, B., & Rossi, F. (2016). Mean absolute percentage error for regression models. Neurocomputing, 192(1), 38-48.
Ertimur, Y., Livnat, J., & Martikainen, M. (2003). Differential market reactions to revenue and expense surprises. Review of Accounting Studies, 8, 185-211.
Ettredge, M., Gerdes, J., & Karuga, G. (2005). Using web-based search data to predict macroeconomic statistics. Communications of the ACM, 48(11), 87-92.
Gers, F. A., Schmidhuber, J., & Cummins, F. (2000). Learning to forget: Continual prediction with LSTM. Neural Computation, 12(10), 2451-2471.
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. The MIT Press.
Greff, K., Srivastava, R. K., Koutník, J., Steunebrink, B. R., & Schmidhuber, J. (2017). LSTM: A search space odyssey. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 28(10), 2222-2232.
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006). A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Computation, 18(7), 1527-1554.
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735-1780.
Hyndman, R. J., & Koehler, A. B. (2006). Another look at measures of forecast accuracy. International Journal of Forecasting, 22(4), 679-688.
Jegadeesh, N., & Livnat, J. (2006). Revenue surprises and stock returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 41, 147-171.
Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015). Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science, 349, 255-260.
Kim, S., & Kim, H. (2016). A new metric of absolute percentage error for intermittent demand forecasts. International Journal of Forecasting, 32(3), 669-679.
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444.
Ledley, F. D., McCoy, S. S., Vaughan, G., & Cleary, E. G. (2020). Profitability of large pharmaceutical companies compared with other large public companies. JAMA, 323(9), 834-843.
Liu, T. A. (2022). Predicting the signals of monthly revenues in Taiwan by machine learning models [Master’s Thesis, National Taiwan University].
Makridakis, S., Wheelwright, S., & Hyndman, R. J. (1998). Forecasting: Methods and applications. (3rd ed. ed.). John Wiley and Sons.
Pascanu, R., Mikolov, T., & Bengio, Y. (2013). On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks. International Conference on Machine Learning,
Preis, T., Moat, H. S., & Stanley, H. E. (2013). Quantifying trading behavior in financial markets using Google Trends. Scientific Reports, 3, 1684.
Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 206-215.
Wang, Y., & Guo, Y. (2020). Forecasting method of stock market volatility in time series data based on mixed model of ARIMA and XGBoost. China Communications, 17(3), 205-221.
Willmott, C. J., & Matsuura, K. (2005). Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate Research, 30(1), 79–82.
Zhang, Y., & Ling, C. (2018). A strategy to apply machine learning to small datasets in materials science. npj Computational Materials, 4(1).
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91747-
dc.description.abstract本論文旨在探討機器學習和深度學習模型在月營收預測中的應用,並進一步考慮網路搜尋量變數和季節性因素對預測準確度的影響。研究結果表明,有效的模型設計可以解決基礎模型在反映實際情況上的落後性問題,提高預測準確度。同時,考慮長時間段的月營收資料能夠更好地捕捉趨勢並避免異常值的影響。此外,資料的平減處理和網路搜尋量變數的加入均能提高預測準確度,尤其是在難以預測的時間段。
在模型比較方面,根據不同的情境,機器學習模型和深度學習模型的表現存在差異。當考慮網路搜尋量變數和平減後的原始資料時,機器學習模型的表現較好;而當考慮網路搜尋量變數和平減後的分解資料時,深度學習模型相對於機器學習模型表現較好。進一步的變數重要性分析表明,不同模型對趨勢、季節性和殘差的影響有所不同,這有助於選擇合適的機器學習模型以提高預測準確度。最後,季節性對月營收的影響被證明是重要的,忽略季節性將導致預測結果明顯較差。
本論文的結果為業界和學術界提供了有價值的洞察和實用工具,可用於改進月營收的預測準確度。透過機器學習和深度學習模型,考慮網路搜尋量變數和季節性因素,能夠更準確地預測月營收並更好地理解其變化趨勢。這將有助於投資人做出更明智的投資決策,提高投資效益並降低風險。未來的研究可進一步探索其他影響月營收的因素,並開發更精確的預測模型,以應對不斷變化的商業環境。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to explore the application of machine learning and deep learning models in monthly revenue forecasting, while considering the impact of search volume variables and seasonal factors on prediction accuracy. The results show that effective model design can address the lagging issue of baseline models in reflecting real-world situations and improve prediction accuracy. Additionally, considering long time periods of monthly revenue data can better capture trends and avoid the influence of outliers. Furthermore, data deflating and the inclusion of search volume variables both contribute to improved prediction accuracy, especially during difficult-to-predict time periods.
In terms of model comparison, the performance of machine learning models and deep learning models differs depending on the context. Machine learning models perform better when considering search volume variables and deflating raw data, while deep learning models outperform machine learning models when considering search volume variables and deflating decomposed data. Further analysis of variable importance reveals that different models have varying impacts on trends, seasonality, and residuals, which helps in selecting the appropriate machine learning model to enhance prediction accuracy. Finally, the influence of seasonality on monthly revenue is proven to be significant, and neglecting seasonality leads to significantly poorer prediction results.
The results of this study provide valuable insights and practical tools for industry and academia to improve the accuracy of monthly revenue forecasting. Through the use of machine learning and deep learning models, considering search volume variables and seasonal factors, more accurate predictions of monthly revenue can be achieved, and a better understanding of its changing trends can be obtained. This will aid investors in making more informed investment decisions, increasing investment returns, and reducing risks. Future research can further explore other factors that impact monthly revenue and develop more precise prediction models to adapt to the ever-changing business environment.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-02-22T16:32:11Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-02-22T16:32:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 i
謝辭 ii
摘要 iii
ABSTRACT iv
目 次 v
圖 次 vii
表 次 ix
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 月營收資訊的重要性 5
第二節 網路搜尋數據 6
第三節 機器學習與深度學習模型 7
第三章 研究設計 9
第一節 研究架構 9
第二節 資料蒐集與樣本選取 11
第三節 探索式資料分析 14
第四節 變數定義 18
第五節 模型設計與資料前處理 20
第六節 模型評估 22
第四章 實證結果與分析 24
第一節 樣本敘述性統計 24
第二節 整體預測結果 30
第三節 各模型預測結果—未加上網路搜尋量變數 38
第四節 各模型預測結果—加上網路搜尋量變數 51
第五章 結論與建議 55
第一節 研究結論 55
第二節 研究貢獻 57
第三節 研究限制與建議 59
附錄 60
參考文獻 63
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject深度學習zh_TW
dc.subject機器學習zh_TW
dc.subject網路搜尋量zh_TW
dc.subject月營收zh_TW
dc.subjectMonthly Revenueen
dc.subjectDeep Learningen
dc.subjectMachine Learningen
dc.subjectSearch Volumeen
dc.title網路搜尋量及月營收歷史資料預測未來月營收—機器學習與深度學習之應用zh_TW
dc.titlePredicting Future Monthly Revenue Using Search Volume and Historical Revenue Data: Applications of Machine Learning and Deep Learningen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear112-1-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.coadvisor劉心才zh_TW
dc.contributor.coadvisorHsin-Tsai Liuen
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee簡雪芳;李淑華zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeHsueh-Fang Chien;Shu-Hua Leeen
dc.subject.keyword月營收,網路搜尋量,機器學習,深度學習,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordMonthly Revenue,Search Volume,Machine Learning,Deep Learning,en
dc.relation.page65-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202400221-
dc.rights.note未授權-
dc.date.accepted2024-01-30-
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept會計學系-
顯示於系所單位:會計學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-112-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
6.94 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved