請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91699
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 王全三 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Chuan-San Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 簡鈺庭 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Ting Chien | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-22T16:17:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-23 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2024-02-22 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2024-01-31 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 王全三、林正芳、荷世平(2023年11月)。永續性發展的歷史演進、 理論基礎與新理論觀點。會計研究月刊,456,106。
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The review of economic studies, 58(2), 277-297. Bae, K. H., Lim, C., & Wei, K. J. (2006). Corporate governance and conditional skewness in the world’s stock markets. The Journal of Business, 79(6), 2999-3028. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of econometrics, 87(1), 115-143. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of management review, 4(4), 497-505. Chen, J., Hong, H., & Stein, J. C. (2001). Forecasting crashes: Trading volume, past returns, and conditional skewness in stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 61(3), 345-381. Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary accounting research, 13(1), 1-36. El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388-2406. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of sustainable finance & investment, 5(4), 210-233. Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. Springer. Gelb, D. S., & Strawser, J. A. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and financial disclosures: An alternative explanation for increased disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 33, 1-13. Giese, G., Lee, L.-E., Melas, D., Nagy, Z., & Nishikawa, L. (2019). Foundations of ESG investing: How ESG affects equity valuation, risk, and performance. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(5), 69-83. Gonçalves, T. C., Dias, J., & Barros, V. (2022). Sustainability performance and the cost of capital. International Journal of Financial Studies, 10(3), 63. Harvey, C. R., & Siddique, A. (2000). Conditional skewness in asset pricing tests. The journal of finance, 55(3), 1263-1295. Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers'' personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 33-44. Huang, D. Z. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) activity and firm performance: A review and consolidation. Accounting & finance, 61(1), 335-360. Hutton, A. P., Marcus, A. J., & Tehranian, H. (2009). Opaque financial reports, R2, and crash risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(1), 67-86. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. Jin, L., & Myers, S. C. (2006). R2 around the world: New theory and new tests. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(2), 257-292. Kim, J.-B., Li, Y., & Zhang, L. (2011a). CFOs versus CEOs: Equity incentives and crashes. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3), 713-730. Kim, J.-B., Li, Y., & Zhang, L. (2011b). Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk: Firm-level analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3), 639-662. Kim, Y., Li, H., & Li, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 43, 1-13. Kim, Y., Park, M. S., & Wier, B. (2012). Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? The Accounting Review, 87(3), 761-796. Kim, Y., & Statman, M. (2012). Do corporations invest enough in environmental responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics, 105, 115-129. Kocmanová, A., & Dočekalová, M. (2012). Construction of the economic indicators of performance in relation to environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) factors. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 60(4), 195-206. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of management studies, 43(1), 1-18. Nirino, N., Santoro, G., Miglietta, N., & Quaglia, R. (2021). Corporate controversies and company''s financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120341. Petrovits, C. M. (2006). Corporate-sponsored foundations and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 41(3), 335-362. Shaikh, I. (2022). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practice and firm performance: an international evidence. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(1), 218–237-218–237. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91699 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探討永續性發展投入與股價崩盤風險之關係,股價崩盤風險起因於市場中的資訊不對稱,如果市場參與者無法獲取完整和準確的資訊,將使投資者難以準確評估風險,且壞消息若囤積到一定程度爆發則會導致股價崩盤。而永續性發展之投入則能帶來更多資訊的揭露,對於市場來說是一項重要的指標,可以避免過於資訊不對稱之情形而做出不良的投資判斷。為了評估永續性發展投入的表現,本研究使用了TESG永續發展指標資料庫中的ESG分數作為衡量標準。同時,採用過去文獻中用以評估股價崩盤風險的方法進行分析。
研究結果支持了永續性發展投入降低股價崩盤風險的觀點,即使在考慮內生性問題後,結果仍然保持一致。進一步根據公司治理效率將樣本公司分組,結果顯示公司治理效率較低的公司在永續性發展投入對於股價崩盤風險的抑制效果更為顯著。同時,以永續報告書是否經第三方認證作為分組標準,結果顯示未經第三方驗證的公司相較於經第三方驗證的公司在永續性發展投入對股價崩盤風險的抑制效果更為顯著。這兩個結果表明,對於資訊揭露較低的公司,永續性發展投入帶來的資訊量更能有效抑制股價崩盤風險。最後,本研究透過探討永續性發展投入與股價崩盤風險的關係,為台灣市場的投資人提供更多風險評估的參考,有望將其納入投資組合。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This research aims to investigate the relationship between sustainable development investment and stock price crash risk. The phenomenon of stock price crash risk arises from information asymmetry in the market. When market participants cannot access complete and accurate information, investors find it challenging to assess risks accurately. Furthermore, the accumulation of adverse news, if reaching a certain threshold, can trigger a stock price crash. Sustainable development investment is posited to bring about increased information disclosure, serving as a crucial indicator for the market. This can mitigate situations of excessive information asymmetry, preventing investors from making poor investment judgements. To measure the performance of sustainable development investment, this study utilizes ESG scores from the TESG Sustainable Development Indicator Database. The analysis is conducted based on methodologies established in past literature for assessing stock price crash risk.
The results support the viewpoint that sustainable development investment can reduce stock price crash risk, and this conclusion holds even after considering endogeneity issues. Further categorizing sample companies based on corporate governance efficiency reveals that companies with lower governance efficiency exhibit a more pronounced reduction in stock price crash risk through sustainable development investment compared to those with higher efficiency. Similarly, when categorizing companies based on whether their sustainability reports are third-party certified, the study finds that companies without third-party verification experience a more significant reduction in stock price crash risk through sustainable development investment compared to certified counterparts. Both results suggest that for companies with initially lower information disclosure levels, sustainable development investment brings about a more substantial information impact in mitigating stock price crash risk. In conclusion, this study, by exploring the relationship between sustainable development investment and stock price crash risk, provides Taiwanese market investors with additional reference points for risk assessment, offering insights into potential portfolio inclusion. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-02-22T16:17:51Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-02-22T16:17:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 目次 v 表次 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景及動機 1 第二節 研究架構 4 第二章 文獻回顧及假說建立 5 第一節 文獻回顧 5 一、 永續性發展之演進 5 二、 我國永續性發展之推動 7 三、 永續性發展之相關研究 9 四、 股價崩盤風險之相關研究 11 五、 永續性發展投入與股價崩盤風險關係之研究 12 第二節 假說建立 13 第三章 研究方法 15 第一節 樣本及資料來源 15 第二節 永續性發展投入表現之衡量 16 第三節 被解釋變數—股價崩盤風險 16 第四節 控制變數 17 第五節 模型設計 18 第四章 實證結果 20 第一節 敘述統計及相關性分析 20 第二節 永續性發展投入對股價崩盤風險結果分析 24 第三節 公司治理對於永續性發展投入與股價崩盤風險關係變動之效果 27 第四節 永續性發展投入是否經認證對於股價崩盤風險之效果 31 第五節 內生性問題 33 第五章 結論與建議 36 附錄一 國際編製準則 38 GRI(GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE) 38 SASB(SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD) 40 TCFD(TASK FORCE ON CLIMATE-RELATED FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE) 41 參考文獻 44 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 永續性發展投入與股價崩盤風險之關係 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Relationship between Sustainable Development Investment and Stock Price Crash Risk | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-1 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 洪瑞成;黃健銘 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Jui-Cheng Hung;Chien-Ming Huang | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 永續性發展投入,ESG評級,股價崩盤風險, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Sustainable development investment,ESG ratings,Stock price crash risk, | en |
dc.relation.page | 46 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202400339 | - |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2024-02-02 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.32 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。