請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91670
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 余明俊 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Ming-Jiun Yu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林怡君 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Jiun Lin | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-20T16:28:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-21 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2024-02-20 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2024-02-19 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Kaufman DP, Basit H, Knohl SJ. Physiology, Glomerular Filtration Rate. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL) 2022.
2. Agre P, Preston GM, Smith BL, et al. Aquaporin CHIP: the archetypal molecular water channel. Am J Physiol. 1993.265(4 Pt 2):F463-F476. 3. Nielsen S, Smith BL, Christensen EI, Knepper MA, Agre P. CHIP28 water channels are localized in constitutively water-permeable segments of the nephron. J Cell Biol. 1993.120(2):371-383. 4. Fushimi K, Uchida S, Hara Y, Hirata Y, Marumo F, Sasaki S. Cloning and expression of apical membrane water channel of rat kidney collecting tubule. Nature. 1993.361(6412):549-552. 5. Nielsen S, DiGiovanni SR, Christensen EI, Knepper MA, Harris HW. Cellular and subcellular immunolocalization of vasopressin-regulated water channel in rat kidney. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993.90(24):11663-11667. 6. Katsura T, Verbavatz JM, Farinas J, et al. Constitutive and regulated membrane expression of aquaporin 1 and aquaporin 2 water channels in stably transfected LLC-PK1 epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995.92(16):7212-7216. 7. Kortenoeven ML, Fenton RA. Renal aquaporins and water balance disorders. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014.1840(5):1533-1549. 8. Cheung PW, Bouley R, Brown D. Targeting the Trafficking of Kidney Water Channels for Therapeutic Benefit. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2020.60:175-194. 9. Feraille E, Sassi A, Olivier V, Arnoux G, Martin PY. Renal water transport in health and disease. Pflugers Arch. 2022.474(8):841-852. 10. Knepper MA, Kwon TH, Nielsen S. Molecular physiology of water balance. N Engl J Med. 2015.372(14):1349-58. 11. Nielsen S, Chou CL, Marples D, Christensen EI, Kishore BK, Knepper MA. Vasopressin increases water permeability of kidney collecting duct by inducing translocation of aquaporin-CD water channels to plasma membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995.92(4):1013-7. 12. DiGiovanni SR, Nielsen S, Christensen EI, Knepper MA. Regulation of collecting duct water channel expression by vasopressin in Brattleboro rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994.91(19):8984-8. 13. Takata K, Matsuzaki T, Tajika Y, Ablimit A, Hasegawa T. Localization and trafficking of aquaporin 2 in the kidney. Histochem Cell Biol. 2008.130(2):197-209. 14. Stenmark H. Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009.10(8):513-525. 15. Barile M, Pisitkun T, Yu MJ, et al. Large scale protein identification in intracellular aquaporin-2 vesicles from renal inner medullary collecting duct. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2005.4(8):1095-1106. 16. Tajika Y, Matsuzaki T, Suzuki T, et al. Differential regulation of AQP2 trafficking in endosomes by microtubules and actin filaments. Histochem Cell Biol. 2005.124(1):1-12. 17. Vossenkämper A, Nedvetsky PI, Wiesner B, Furkert J, Rosenthal W, Klussmann E. Microtubules are needed for the perinuclear positioning of aquaporin-2 after its endocytic retrieval in renal principal cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007.293(3):C1129-C1138. 18. Lee MS, Choi HJ, Park EJ, Park HJ, Kwon TH. Depletion of vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 35 is associated with increased lysosomal degradation of aquaporin-2. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2016.311(6):F1294-F1307. 19. Wang WL, Su SH, Wong KY, Yang CW, Liu CF, Yu MJ. Rab7 involves Vps35 to mediate AQP2 sorting and apical trafficking in collecting duct cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2020.318(4):F956-F970. 20. Loo CS, Chen CW, Wang PJ, et al. Quantitative apical membrane proteomics reveals vasopressin-induced actin dynamics in collecting duct cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013.110(42):17119-17124. 21. Sasaki S, Yui N, Noda Y. Actin directly interacts with different membrane channel proteins and influences channel activities: AQP2 as a model. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014.1838(2):514-520. 22. Simon H, Gao Y, Franki N, Hays RM. Vasopressin depolymerizes apical F-actin in rat inner medullary collecting duct. Am J Physiol. 1993.265(3 Pt 1):C757-C762. 23. Klussmann E, Tamma G, Lorenz D, et al. An inhibitory role of Rho in the vasopressin-mediated translocation of aquaporin-2 into cell membranes of renal principal cells. J Biol Chem. 2001.276(23):20451-20457. 24. Tamma G, Klussmann E, Maric K, et al. Rho inhibits cAMP-induced translocation of aquaporin-2 into the apical membrane of renal cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2001.281(6):F1092-F1101. 25. Tamma G, Klussmann E, Procino G, Svelto M, Rosenthal W, Valenti G. cAMP-induced AQP2 translocation is associated with RhoA inhibition through RhoA phosphorylation and interaction with RhoGDI. J Cell Sci. 2003.116(Pt 8):1519-1525. 26. Tamma G, Carmosino M, Svelto M, Valenti G. Bradykinin signaling counteracts cAMP-elicited aquaporin 2 translocation in renal cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005.16(10):2881-2889. 27. Li W, Zhang Y, Bouley R, et al. Simvastatin enhances aquaporin-2 surface expression and urinary concentration in vasopressin-deficient Brattleboro rats through modulation of Rho GTPase. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2011.301(2):F309-F318. 28. Lei L, Huang M, Su L, et al. Manganese promotes intracellular accumulation of AQP2 via modulating F-actin polymerization and reduces urinary concentration in mice. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2018.314(2):F306-F316. 29. Xie L, Hoffert JD, Chou CL, et al. Quantitative analysis of aquaporin-2 phosphorylation. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010.298(4):F1018-F1023. 30. Hoffert JD, Fenton RA, Moeller HB, et al. Vasopressin-stimulated increase in phosphorylation at Ser269 potentiates plasma membrane retention of aquaporin-2. J Biol Chem. 2008.283(36):24617-24627. 31. Wang PJ, Lin ST, Liu SH, et al. Vasopressin-induced serine 269 phosphorylation reduces Sipa1l1 (signal-induced proliferation-associated 1 like 1)-mediated aquaporin-2 endocytosis. J Biol Chem. 2017.292(19):7984-7993. 32. Moeller HB, Praetorius J, Rützler MR, Fenton RA. Phosphorylation of aquaporin-2 regulates its endocytosis and protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010.107(1):424-429. 33. Moeller HB, Aroankins TS, Slengerik-Hansen J, Pisitkun T, Fenton RA. Phosphorylation and ubiquitylation are opposing processes that regulate endocytosis of the water channel aquaporin-2. J Cell Sci. 2014.127(Pt 14):3174-3183. 34. Wong KY, Wang WL, Su SH, Liu CF, Yu MJ. Intracellular location of aquaporin-2 serine 269 phosphorylation and dephosphorylation in kidney collecting duct cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2020.319(4):F592-F602. 35. Branon TC, Bosch JA, Sanchez AD, et al. Efficient proximity labeling in living cells and organisms with TurboID. Nat Biotechnol. 2018.36(9):880-887. 36. Yu MJ, Miller RL, Uawithya P, et al. Systems-level analysis of cell-specific AQP2 gene expression in renal collecting duct. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009.106(7):2441-2446. 37. Yang CR, Tongyoo P, Emamian M, Sandoval PC, Raghuram V, Knepper MA. Deep proteomic profiling of vasopressin-sensitive collecting duct cells. I. Virtual Western blots and molecular weight distributions. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2015.309(12):C785-C798. 38. Yang CR, Raghuram V, Emamian M, Sandoval PC, Knepper MA. Deep proteomic profiling of vasopressin-sensitive collecting duct cells. II. Bioinformatic analysis of vasopressin signaling. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2015.309(12):C799-C812. 39. Bradford D, Raghuram V, Wilson JL, et al. Use of LC-MS/MS and Bayes' theorem to identify protein kinases that phosphorylate aquaporin-2 at Ser256. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2014.307(2):C123-C139. 40. Sanghi A, Zaringhalam M, Corcoran CC, et al. A knowledge base of vasopressin actions in the kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2014.307(6):F747-F755. 41. Datta A, Yang CR, Limbutara K, et al. PKA-independent vasopressin signaling in renal collecting duct. FASEB J. 2020.34(5):6129-6146. 42. Ducharme NA, Hales CM, Lapierre LA, et al. MARK2/EMK1/Par-1Balpha phosphorylation of Rab11-family interacting protein 2 is necessary for the timely establishment of polarity in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2006.17(8):3625-3637. 43. Lapierre LA, Avant KM, Caldwell CM, et al. Phosphorylation of Rab11-FIP2 regulates polarity in MDCK cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2012.23(12):2302-2318. 44. McRae R, Lapierre LA, Manning EH, Goldenring JR. Rab11-FIP1 phosphorylation by MARK2 regulates polarity in MDCK cells. Cell Logist. 2017.7(1):e1271498. 45. Cohen D, Rodriguez-Boulan E, Müsch A. Par-1 promotes a hepatic mode of apical protein trafficking in MDCK cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004.101(38):13792-13797. 46. Stiffler MA, Chen JR, Grantcharova VP, et al. PDZ domain binding selectivity is optimized across the mouse proteome. Science. 2007.317(5836):364-369. 47. Bhattacharyya RP, Reményi A, Yeh BJ, Lim WA. Domains, motifs, and scaffolds: the role of modular interactions in the evolution and wiring of cell signaling circuits. Annu Rev Biochem. 2006.75:655-680. 48. Noda Y, Horikawa S, Furukawa T, et al. Aquaporin-2 trafficking is regulated by PDZ-domain containing protein SPA-1. FEBS Lett. 2004.568(1-3):139-145. 49. Dubois T, Paléotti O, Mironov AA, et al. Golgi-localized GAP for Cdc42 functions downstream of ARF1 to control Arp2/3 complex and F-actin dynamics. Nat Cell Biol. 2005.7(4):353-364. 50. Lazarini M, Traina F, Machado-Neto JA, et al. ARHGAP21 is a RhoGAP for RhoA and RhoC with a role in proliferation and migration of prostate adenocarcinoma cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013.1832(2):365-374. 51. Duong Van Huyen J, Bens M, Vandewalle A. Differential effects of aldosterone and vasopressin on chloride fluxes in transimmortalized mouse cortical collecting duct cells. J Membr Biol. 1998.164(1):79-90. 52. Johnson JL, Yaron TM, Huntsman EM, et al. An atlas of substrate specificities for the human serine/threonine kinome. Nature. 2023.613(7945):759-766. 53. Sugiyama N, Imamura H, Ishihama Y. Large-scale Discovery of Substrates of the Human Kinome. Sci Rep. 2019.9(1):10503. 54. Cartharius K, Frech K, Grote K, et al. MatInspector and beyond: promoter analysis based on transcription factor binding sites. Bioinformatics. 2005.21(13):2933-2942. 55. Timm T, von Kries JP, Li X, Zempel H, Mandelkow E, Mandelkow EM. Microtubule affinity regulating kinase activity in living neurons was examined by a genetically encoded fluorescence resonance energy transfer/fluorescence lifetime imaging-based biosensor: inhibitors with therapeutic potential. J Biol Chem. 2011.286(48):41711-41722. 56. Chan KT, Asokan SB, King SJ, et al. LKB1 loss in melanoma disrupts directional migration toward extracellular matrix cues. J Cell Biol. 2014.207(2):299-315. 57. Vanderweyde T, Apicco DJ, Youmans-Kidder K, et al. Interaction of tau with the RNA-Binding Protein TIA1 Regulates tau Pathophysiology and Toxicity. Cell Rep. 2016.15(7):1455-1466. 58. He N, Fan W, Henriquez B, et al. Metabolic control of regulatory T cell (Treg) survival and function by Lkb1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017.114(47):12542-12547. 59. Hayden EY, Putman J, Nunez S, et al. Ischemic axonal injury up-regulates MARK4 in cortical neurons and primes tau phosphorylation and aggregation. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2019.7(1):135. 60. Mashukova A, Forteza R, Shah VN, Salas PJ. The cell polarity kinase Par1b/MARK2 activation selects specific NF-kB transcripts via phosphorylation of core mediator Med17/TRAP80. Mol Biol Cell. 2021.32(8):690-702. 61. Fazakerley DJ, van Gerwen J, Cooke KC, et al. Phosphoproteomics reveals rewiring of the insulin signaling network and multi-nodal defects in insulin resistance. Nat Commun. 2023.14(1):923. 62. van der Zande HJ, Brombacher EC, Lambooij JM, et al. Dendritic cell-intrinsic LKB1-AMPK/SIK signaling controls metabolic homeostasis by limiting the hepatic Th17 response during obesity. JCI Insight. 2023.8(11):e157948. 63. Lu YN, Kavianpour S, Zhang T, et al. MARK2 phosphorylates eIF2α in response to proteotoxic stress. PLoS Biol. 2021.19(3):e3001096. 64. Tornavaca O, Chia M, Dufton N, et al. ZO-1 controls endothelial adherens junctions, cell-cell tension, angiogenesis, and barrier formation. J Cell Biol. 2015.208(6):821-838. 65. Sells MA, Chernoff J. Emerging from the Pak: the p21-activated protein kinase family. Trends Cell Biol. 1997.7(4):162-167. 66. Roig J, Traugh JA. Cytostatic p21 G protein-activated protein kinase gamma-PAK. Vitam Horm. 2001.62:167-198. 67. Bokoch GM. Biology of the p21-activated kinases. Annu Rev Biochem. 2003.72:743-781. 68. Martin GA, Bollag G, McCormick F, Abo A. A novel serine kinase activated by rac1/CDC42Hs-dependent autophosphorylation is related to PAK65 and STE20. EMBO J. 1995.14(9):1970-1978. 69. Rudel T, Bokoch GM. Membrane and morphological changes in apoptotic cells regulated by caspase-mediated activation of PAK2. Science. 1997.276(5318):1571-1574. 70. Jakobi R, McCarthy CC, Koeppel MA, Stringer DK. Caspase-activated PAK-2 is regulated by subcellular targeting and proteasomal degradation. J Biol Chem. 2003.278(40):38675-38685. 71. Vilas GL, Corvi MM, Plummer GJ, Seime AM, Lambkin GR, Berthiaume LG. Posttranslational myristoylation of caspase-activated p21-activated protein kinase 2 (PAK2) potentiates late apoptotic events. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006.103(17):6542-6547. 72. Li T, Zhang J, Zhu F, et al. P21-activated protein kinase (PAK2)-mediated c-Jun phosphorylation at 5 threonine sites promotes cell transformation. Carcinogenesis. 2011.32(5):659-666. 73. Kang B, Pu M, Hu G, et al. Phosphorylation of H4 Ser 47 promotes HIRA-mediated nucleosome assembly. Genes Dev. 2011.25(13):1359-1364. 74. Isobe K, Jung HJ, Yang CR, et al. Systems-level identification of PKA-dependent signaling in epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017.114(42):E8875-E8884. 75. Chou CL, Limbutara K, Kao AR, et al. Collecting Duct Water Permeability Inhibition by EGF Is Associated with Decreased cAMP, PKA activity and AQP2 Phosphorylation at Ser269. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 76. Chou CL, Christensen BM, Frische S, et al. Non-muscle myosin II and myosin light chain kinase are downstream targets for vasopressin signaling in the renal collecting duct. J Biol Chem. 2004.279(47):49026-49035. 77. Isobe K, Raghuram V, Krishnan L, Chou CL, Yang CR, Knepper MA. CRISPR-Cas9/phosphoproteomics identifies multiple noncanonical targets of myosin light chain kinase. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2020.318(3):F600-F616. 78. Park E, Yang CR, Raghuram V, Chen L, Chou CL, Knepper MA. Using CRISPR-Cas9/phosphoproteomics to identify substrates of calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase 2δ. J Biol Chem. 2023.299(12):105371. 79. Chen X, An Y, Gao Y, et al. Rare Deleterious PARD3 Variants in the aPKC-Binding Region are Implicated in the Pathogenesis of Human Cranial Neural Tube Defects Via Disrupting Apical Tight Junction Formation. Hum Mutat. 2017.38(4):378-389. 80. Fernández-Larrea J, Merlos-Suárez A, Ureña JM, Baselga J, Arribas J. A role for a PDZ protein in the early secretory pathway for the targeting of proTGF-alpha to the cell surface. Mol Cell. 1999.3(4):423-433. 81. Shibata H, Oishi K, Yamagiwa A, Matsumoto M, Mukai H, Ono Y. PKNbeta interacts with the SH3 domains of Graf and a novel Graf related protein, Graf2, which are GTPase activating proteins for Rho family. J Biochem. 2001.130(1):23-31. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91670 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 第二型水通道蛋白 (AQP2) 是一種受抗利尿激素 (vasopressin) 所調控的水通道蛋白,在腎臟集尿管細胞中負責水分再吸收。受抗利尿激素刺激時,第二型水通道蛋白會從細胞內囊泡運送到細胞頂尖膜,從而進行滲透性水分輸送。第二型水通道蛋白在細胞頂尖膜的定位與其C端PDZ motif中的絲胺酸269磷酸化密切相關。負責第二型水通道蛋白絲胺酸269磷酸化的激酶以及參與頂尖膜運輸的蛋白質目前尚不清楚。我們先前發現,給予抗利尿激素的刺激時,在Vps35表現量降低 (knockdown) 的細胞中,位於回收型囊泡 (Rab11-positive recycling endosomes) 的第二型水通道蛋白發生了絲胺酸269磷酸化。利用TurboID biotin ligase及蛋白質體學之方法,鑑定位於回收型囊泡附近的蛋白質,其中包括Mark2和Arhgap21。我們假設Mark2會磷酸化第二型水通道蛋白的絲胺酸269,而絲胺酸269磷酸化的第二型水通道蛋白結合具有PDZ domain的Arhgap21,這是一種抑制RhoA的GTPase活化蛋白,藉此促進F-actin解聚,使第二型水通道蛋白能插入至頂尖膜。與上述假設一致的是in vitro kinase assay顯示Mark2磷酸化合成的第二型水通道蛋白peptide中的絲胺酸269。然而,在小鼠腎臟皮質集尿管 (mpkCCD) 細胞中,Mark2表現量降低 (knockdown) 以及Mark抑制劑皆未影響抗利尿激素所誘導的絲胺酸269磷酸化。Arhgap21表現量降低 (knockdown) 未影響mpkCCD細胞中F-actin的結構,也未影響第二型水通道蛋白的頂尖膜運輸。為了找到負責磷酸化第二型水通道蛋白絲胺酸269的激酶,我們使用貝氏定理結合各種資料庫,將521種小鼠的激酶進行了排序。Pak2排名第一。Pak2表現量降低 (knockdown) 使mpkCCD細胞無法極化,降低抗利尿激素所誘導的第二型水通道蛋白表達,仍需要進一步探討其功能。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Aquaporin-2 (AQP2) is a vasopressin-regulated water channel protein responsible for water reabsorption in kidney collecting duct cells. In response to vasopressin, AQP2 traffics from intracellular vesicles to the apical plasma membrane, where it mediates osmotic water transport. Apical localization of AQP2 is tightly associated with AQP2 phosphorylation at serine 269 in the COOH-terminal PDZ motif. The kinases and the trafficking machineries responsible for serine 269 phosphorylation and apical AQP2 trafficking remain unknown. We previously found that AQP2 can be phosphorylated at serine 269 in response to vasopressin while in Rab11-positive recycling endosomes in Vps35 knockdown cells. TurboID biotin ligase-based proximity proteomics identified proteins in the vicinity of Rab11-positive recycling endosomes, including microtubule affinity regulating kinase 2 (Mark2) and Rho GTPase-activating protein 21 (Arhgap21). We hypothesized that Mark2 phosphorylates AQP2 at serine 269 and that serine 269 phosphorylated AQP2 recruits PDZ domain-containing Arhgap21, a GTPase-activating protein for RhoA inhibition, to promote F-actin depolymerization for AQP2 insertion at the apical membrane. Consistent with the hypothesis, in vitro kinase assay showed that Mark2 phosphorylated AQP2 serine 269 in a synthetic AQP2 peptide. However, Mark2 knockdown and Mark family kinase inhibitor did not affect vasopressin-induced serine 269 phosphorylation in the mpkCCD cells. Arhgap21 knockdown did not affect F-actin organization and apical AQP2 trafficking in the mpkCCD cells. To identify new protein kinase candidates for AQP2 serine 269 phosphorylation, we used Bayesian analysis to rank all 521 mouse protein kinases based on previously reported datasets. Pak2 was the top candidate. Pak2 knockdown impaired mpkCCD cell polarization and vasopressin-induced AQP2 expression, obliging further investigation for functional implications. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-02-20T16:28:41Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-02-20T16:28:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Introduction 1
Materials and Methods 7 Results 18 Mark2 phosphorylated AQP2 at serine 269 in vitro 18 Mark2 knockdown did not affect AQP2 serine 269 phosphorylation and apical trafficking 18 Mark inhibition did not affect AQP2 serine 269 phosphorylation and apical trafficking 21 Arhgap21 knockdown did not affect AQP2 apical trafficking and serine 269 phosphorylation 22 Bayes' theorem prioritized Pak2 for AQP2 serine 269 phosphorylation 23 Pak2 knockdown impaired mpkCCD cell polarization 24 Discussion 25 Figures and Legends 30 Figure 1. Hypothesis 30 Figure 2. In vitro phosphorylation of the AQP2 peptide at serine 269 by Mark2 31 Figure 3. Mark2 knockdown in the mpkCCD cells 32 Figure 4. No effect on AQP2 apical trafficking and serine 269 phosphorylation in the Mark2 knockdown cells 34 Figure 5. No effect on AQP2 serine 269 phosphorylation in the Mark2 knockdown cells 35 Figure 6. The reduced levels of eIF2a phosphorylation in the presence of Mark inhibitor 36 Figure 7. No effect on AQP2 apical trafficking and serine 269 phosphorylation in the presence of Mark inhibitor 37 Figure 8. Arhgap21 knockdown in the mpkCCD cells 39 Figure 9. No effect on F-actin in the Arhgap21 knockdown cells 40 Figure 10. No effect on AQP2 apical trafficking and serine 269 phosphorylation in the Arhgap21 knockdown cells 43 Figure 11. Use of Bayes' theorem to rank candidate protein kinases for AQP2 serine 269 phosphorylation 45 Figure 12. Pak2 knockdown in the mpkCCD cells 46 Figure 13. Impaired cell polarization and endogenous AQP2 expression in the Pak2 knockdown cells 48 References 49 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.title | 探討Mark2和Arhgap21在Aqp2絲胺酸269磷酸化及頂尖膜運輸的作用 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Investigating roles of Mark2 and Arhgap21 in Aqp2 serine 269 phosphorylation and apical trafficking | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-1 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳炳宏;潘思宇 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Ping-Hung Chen;Szu-Yu Pan | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 第二型水通道蛋白,絲胺酸269磷酸化,頂尖膜運輸,抗利尿激素, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | AQP2,serine 269 phosphorylation,apical trafficking,vasopressin, | en |
dc.relation.page | 54 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202400734 | - |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2024-02-19 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物化學暨分子生物學研究所 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 生物化學暨分子生物學科研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.39 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。