請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91661
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳敏慧 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Ming-Huey Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 佐珊珊 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Zolzaya Javkhlan | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-20T16:26:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-21 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2024-02-20 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2024-02-17 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Ho-Shui-Ling A, Bolander J, Rustom LE, Johnson AW, Luyten FP, Picart C. Bone regeneration strategies: Engineered scaffolds, bioactive molecules and stem cells current stage and future perspectives. Biomaterials. 2018qpslcm@ikd180:143-162.
2. Huang RL, Kobayashi E, Liu K, Li Q. Bone Graft Prefabrication Following the In Vivo Bioreactor Principle. EBioMedicine. 2016qpslcm@ikd12:43-54. 3. Gamblin AL, Brennan MA, Renaud A, et al. Bone tissue formation with human mesenchymal stem cells and biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics: the local implication of osteoclasts and macrophages. Biomaterials. 2014qpslcm@ikd35:9660-9667. 4. Park SA, Lee HJ, Kim SY, Kim KS, Jo DW, Park SY. Three-dimensionally printed polycaprolactone/beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold was more effective as an rhBMP-2 carrier for new bone formation than polycaprolactone alone. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2021qpslcm@ikd109:840-848. 5. Chung TW, Yang MC, Tseng CC, et al. Promoting regeneration of peripheral nerves in-vivo using new PCL-NGF/Tirofiban nerve conduits. Biomaterials. 2011qpslcm@ikd32:734-743. 6. Riccio M, Marchesini A, Pugliese P, De Francesco F. Nerve repair and regeneration: Biological tubulization limits and future perspectives. J Cell Physiol. 2019qpslcm@ikd234:3362-3375. 7. Gong B, Zhang X, Zahrani AA, et al. Neural tissue engineering: From bioactive scaffolds and in situ monitoring to regeneration. Exploration (Beijing). 2022qpslcm@ikd2:20210035. 8. Zein I, Hutmacher DW, Tan KC, Teoh SH. Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials. 2002qpslcm@ikd23:1169-1185. 9. Liu Q, Yuan S, Guo Y, et al. Modulating the crystallinity, mechanical properties, and degradability of poly(ε-caprolactone) derived polyesters by statistical and alternating copolymerization. Polymer Chemistry. 2019qpslcm@ikd10:2579-2588. 10. Friedenstein AJ, Piatetzky S, II, Petrakova KV. Osteogenesis in transplants of bone marrow cells. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1966qpslcm@ikd16:381-390. 11. Friedenstein AJ, Chailakhjan RK, Lalykina KS. The development of fibroblast colonies in monolayer cultures of guinea-pig bone marrow and spleen cells. Cell Tissue Kinet. 1970qpslcm@ikd3:393-403. 12. Kuehnle I, Goodell MA. The therapeutic potential of stem cells from adults. Bmj. 2002qpslcm@ikd325:372-376. 13. Feng X. Chemical and Biochemical Basis of Cell-Bone Matrix Interaction in Health and Disease. Curr Chem Biol. 2009qpslcm@ikd3:189-196. 14. Tzaphlidou M. Bone architecture: collagen structure and calcium/phosphorus maps. J Biol Phys. 2008qpslcm@ikd34:39-49. 15. Florencio-Silva R, Sasso GR, Sasso-Cerri E, Simões MJ, Cerri PS. Biology of Bone Tissue: Structure, Function, and Factors That Influence Bone Cells. Biomed Res Int. 2015qpslcm@ikd2015:421746. 16. Ma Q, Miri Z, Haugen HJ, Moghanian A, Loca D. Significance of mechanical loading in bone fracture healing, bone regeneration, and vascularization. J Tissue Eng. 2023qpslcm@ikd14:20417314231172573. 17. Bono CM, Einhorn TA. Overview of osteoporosis: pathophysiology and determinants of bone strength. Eur Spine J. 2003qpslcm@ikd12 Suppl 2:S90-96. 18. Gerosa L, Lombardi G. Bone-to-Brain: A Round Trip in the Adaptation to Mechanical Stimuli. Front Physiol. 2021qpslcm@ikd12:623893. 19. Tao R, Mi B, Hu Y, et al. Hallmarks of peripheral nerve function in bone regeneration. Bone Res. 2023qpslcm@ikd11:6. 20. Lanigan LG, Russell DS, Woolard KD, et al. Comparative Pathology of the Peripheral Nervous System. Vet Pathol. 2021qpslcm@ikd58:10-33. 21. Bazira PJ. An overview of the nervous system. Surgery (Oxford). 2021qpslcm@ikd39:451-462. 22. Henkel J, Woodruff MA, Epari DR, et al. Bone Regeneration Based on Tissue Engineering Conceptions - A 21st Century Perspective. Bone Res. 2013qpslcm@ikd1:216-248. 23. Neve A, Corrado A, Cantatore FP. Osteoblast physiology in normal and pathological conditions. Cell Tissue Res. 2011qpslcm@ikd343:289-302. 24. Moreira CA, Dempster DW, Baron R. Anatomy and Ultrastructure of Bone – Histogenesis, Growth and Remodeling. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, et al., eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc. Copyright © 2000-2024, MDText.com, Inc.qpslcm@ikd 2000. 25. Bhattarai HK, Shrestha S, Rokka K, Shakya R. Vitamin D, Calcium, Parathyroid Hormone, and Sex Steroids in Bone Health and Effects of Aging. J Osteoporos. 2020qpslcm@ikd2020:9324505. 26. Latic N, Erben RG. FGF23 and Vitamin D Metabolism. JBMR Plus. 2021qpslcm@ikd5:e10558. 27. Schwetz V, Pieber T, Obermayer-Pietsch B. The endocrine role of the skeleton: background and clinical evidence. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012qpslcm@ikd166:959-967. 28. Motyl KJ, Guntur AR, Carvalho AL, Rosen CJ. Energy Metabolism of Bone. Toxicol Pathol. 2017qpslcm@ikd45:887-893. 29. Dallas SL, Prideaux M, Bonewald LF. The osteocyte: an endocrine cell ... and more. Endocr Rev. 2013qpslcm@ikd34:658-690. 30. Wijenayaka AR, Kogawa M, Lim HP, Bonewald LF, Findlay DM, Atkins GJ. Sclerostin stimulates osteocyte support of osteoclast activity by a RANKL-dependent pathway. Plos One. 2011qpslcm@ikd6:e25900. 31. Vasiliadis ES, Evangelopoulos DS, Kaspiris A, Benetos IS, Vlachos C, Pneumaticos SG. The Role of Sclerostin in Bone Diseases. J Clin Med. 2022qpslcm@ikd11. 32. Xie J, Guo J, Kanwal Z, et al. Calcitonin and Bone Physiology: In Vitro, In Vivo, and Clinical Investigations. Int J Endocrinol. 2020qpslcm@ikd2020:3236828. 33. Robling AG, Bonewald LF. The Osteocyte: New Insights. Annu Rev Physiol. 2020qpslcm@ikd82:485-506. 34. Bjelić D, Finšgar M. Bioactive coatings with anti-osteoclast therapeutic agents for bone implants: Enhanced compliance and prolonged implant life. Pharmacol Res. 2022qpslcm@ikd176:106060. 35. Delaisse JM, Søe K, Andersen TL, Rojek AM, Marcussen N. The Mechanism Switching the Osteoclast From Short to Long Duration Bone Resorption. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021qpslcm@ikd9:644503. 36. Zhao H. Membrane trafficking in osteoblasts and osteoclasts: new avenues for understanding and treating skeletal diseases. Traffic. 2012qpslcm@ikd13:1307-1314. 37. Veis DJ, O''Brien CA. Osteoclasts, Master Sculptors of Bone. Annu Rev Pathol. 2023qpslcm@ikd18:257-281. 38. Lopes D, Martins-Cruz C, Oliveira MB, Mano JF. Bone physiology as inspiration for tissue regenerative therapies. Biomaterials. 2018qpslcm@ikd185:240-275. 39. Baek JE, Choi JY, Kim JE. Skeletal analysis and differential gene expression in Runx2/Osterix double heterozygous embryos. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014qpslcm@ikd451:442-448. 40. Kobayashi Y, Maeda K, Takahashi N. Roles of Wnt signaling in bone formation and resorption. Japanese Dental Science Review. 2008qpslcm@ikd44:76-82. 41. Clarke B. Normal bone anatomy and physiology. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008qpslcm@ikd3 Suppl 3:S131-139. 42. Bianco P, Gehron Robey P. Marrow stromal stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2000qpslcm@ikd105:1663-1668. 43. Debanne D, Campanac E, Bialowas A, Carlier E, Alcaraz G. Axon physiology. Physiol Rev. 2011qpslcm@ikd91:555-602. 44. Oudejans E, Luchicchi A, Strijbis EMM, Geurts JJG, van Dam AM. Is MS affecting the CNS only? Lessons from clinic to myelin pathophysiology. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2021qpslcm@ikd8. 45. Ndubaku U, de Bellard ME. Glial cells: old cells with new twists. Acta Histochem. 2008qpslcm@ikd110:182-195. 46. Thaxton C, Bhat MA. Myelination and regional domain differentiation of the axon. Results Probl Cell Differ. 2009qpslcm@ikd48:1-28. 47. Jessen KR, Mirsky R. The origin and development of glial cells in peripheral nerves. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005qpslcm@ikd6:671-682. 48. Rosso G, Young P, Shahin V. Implications of Schwann Cells Biomechanics and Mechanosensitivity for Peripheral Nervous System Physiology and Pathophysiology. Front Mol Neurosci. 2017qpslcm@ikd10:345. 49. Sulaiman W, Gordon T. Neurobiology of peripheral nerve injury, regeneration, and functional recovery: from bench top research to bedside application. Ochsner J. 2013qpslcm@ikd13:100-108. 50. Breeland G, Aktar A, Patel BC. Anatomy, Head and Neck, Mandible. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2024, StatPearls Publishing LLC.qpslcm@ikd 2024. 51. Wolf KT, Brokaw EJ, Bell A, Joy A. Variant Inferior Alveolar Nerves and Implications for Local Anesthesia. Anesth Prog. 2016qpslcm@ikd63:84-90. 52. Pitirri MK, Durham EL, Romano NA, et al. Meckel''s Cartilage in Mandibular Development and Dysmorphogenesis. Front Genet. 2022qpslcm@ikd13:871927. 53. Amano O, Doi T, Yamada T, et al. Meckel''s Cartilage: Discovery, Embryology and Evolution: —Overview of the Specificity of Meckel''s Cartilage—. Journal of Oral Biosciences. 2010qpslcm@ikd52:125-135. 54. Amini AR, Laurencin CT, Nukavarapu SP. Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2012qpslcm@ikd40:363-408. 55. Liao Y, Zhang XL, Li L, Shen FM, Zhong MK. Stem cell therapy for bone repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies with large animal models. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014qpslcm@ikd78:718-726. 56. Nicolas J, Magli S, Rabbachin L, Sampaolesi S, Nicotra F, Russo L. 3D Extracellular Matrix Mimics: Fundamental Concepts and Role of Materials Chemistry to Influence Stem Cell Fate. Biomacromolecules. 2020qpslcm@ikd21:1968-1994. 57. Wang F, Cai X, Shen Y, Meng L. Cell-scaffold interactions in tissue engineering for oral and craniofacial reconstruction. Bioact Mater. 2023qpslcm@ikd23:16-44. 58. Crupi A, Costa A, Tarnok A, Melzer S, Teodori L. Inflammation in tissue engineering: The Janus between engraftment and rejection. Eur J Immunol. 2015qpslcm@ikd45:3222-3236. 59. Ma PX. Scaffolds for tissue fabrication. Materials Today. 2004qpslcm@ikd7:30-40. 60. Dorozhkin SV. Bioceramics of calcium orthophosphates. Biomaterials. 2010qpslcm@ikd31:1465-1485. 61. Marin E. History of dental biomaterials: biocompatibility, durability and still open challenges. Heritage Science. 2023qpslcm@ikd11:207. 62. Jang HY, Shin JY, Oh SH, Byun JH, Lee JH. PCL/HA Hybrid Microspheres for Effective Osteogenic Differentiation and Bone Regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020qpslcm@ikd6:5172-5180. 63. Ma Y, Dai H, Huang X, Long Y. 3D printing of bioglass-reinforced β-TCP porous bioceramic scaffolds. Journal of Materials Science. 2019qpslcm@ikd54:10437-10446. 64. Guo L, Liang Z, Yang L, et al. The role of natural polymers in bone tissue engineering. J Control Release. 2021qpslcm@ikd338:571-582. 65. Stevens MM. Biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. Materials Today. 2008qpslcm@ikd11:18-25. 66. Bohner M, Santoni BLG, Döbelin N. β-tricalcium phosphate for bone substitution: Synthesis and properties. Acta Biomater. 2020qpslcm@ikd113:23-41. 67. Gattazzo F, Urciuolo A, Bonaldo P. Extracellular matrix: a dynamic microenvironment for stem cell niche. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014qpslcm@ikd1840:2506-2519. 68. Zhu G, Zhang T, Chen M, et al. Bone physiological microenvironment and healing mechanism: Basis for future bone-tissue engineering scaffolds. Bioact Mater. 2021qpslcm@ikd6:4110-4140. 69. Shoulders MD, Raines RT. Collagen structure and stability. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009qpslcm@ikd78:929-958. 70. Li Y, Liu Y, Li R, et al. Collagen-based biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. Mater Design. 2021qpslcm@ikd210:110049. 71. Licini C, Vitale-Brovarone C, Mattioli-Belmonte M. Collagen and non-collagenous proteins molecular crosstalk in the pathophysiology of osteoporosis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2019qpslcm@ikd49:59-69. 72. Muir VG, Burdick JA. Chemically Modified Biopolymers for the Formation of Biomedical Hydrogels. Chem Rev. 2021qpslcm@ikd121:10908-10949. 73. Suamte L, Tirkey A, Barman J, Jayasekhar Babu P. Various manufacturing methods and ideal properties of scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Smart Materials in Manufacturing. 2023qpslcm@ikd1:100011. 74. Liu S, Qin S, He M, Zhou D, Qin Q, Wang H. Current applications of poly(lactic acid) composites in tissue engineering and drug delivery. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2020qpslcm@ikd199:108238. 75. Xu F, Dawson C, Lamb M, et al. Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering: Addressing Key Design Needs Toward Clinical Translation. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022qpslcm@ikd10:849831. 76. Li Z, Du T, Ruan C, Niu X. Bioinspired mineralized collagen scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Bioact Mater. 2021qpslcm@ikd6:1491-1511. 77. Woodard LN, Grunlan MA. Hydrolytic degradation of PCL-PLLA semi-IPNs exhibiting rapid, tunable degradation. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019qpslcm@ikd5:498-508. 78. Bartnikowski M, Dargaville TR, Ivanovski S, Hutmacher DW. Degradation mechanisms of polycaprolactone in the context of chemistry, geometry and environment. Prog Polym Sci. 2019qpslcm@ikd96:1-20. 79. Barbarisi M, Marino G, Armenia E, et al. Use of polycaprolactone (PCL) as scaffolds for the regeneration of nerve tissue. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015qpslcm@ikd103:1755-1760. 80. Nikolova MP, Chavali MS. Recent advances in biomaterials for 3D scaffolds: A review. Bioact Mater. 2019qpslcm@ikd4:271-292. 81. Blau A, Weinl C, Mack J, Kienle S, Jung G, Ziegler C. Promotion of neural cell adhesion by electrochemically generated and functionalized polymer films. J Neurosci Methods. 2001qpslcm@ikd112:65-73. 82. Crompton KE, Goud JD, Bellamkonda RV, et al. Polylysine-functionalised thermoresponsive chitosan hydrogel for neural tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2007qpslcm@ikd28:441-449. 83. Hernandez DS, Schunk HC, Shankar KM, Rosales AM, Suggs LJ. Poly-d-lysine coated nanoparticles to identify pro-inflammatory macrophages. Nanoscale Adv. 2020qpslcm@ikd2:3849-3857. 84. Paetzold R, Coulter FB, Singh G, Kelly DJ, O''Cearbhaill ED. Fused filament fabrication of polycaprolactone bioscaffolds: Influence of fabrication parameters and thermal environment on geometric fidelity and mechanical properties. Bioprinting. 2022qpslcm@ikd27:e00206. 85. Abdelfatah J, Paz R, Alemán-Domínguez ME, Monzón M, Donate R, Winter G. Experimental Analysis of the Enzymatic Degradation of Polycaprolactone: Microcrystalline Cellulose Composites and Numerical Method for the Prediction of the Degraded Geometry. Materials (Basel). 2021qpslcm@ikd14. 86. Shi K, Jing J, Song L, Su T, Wang Z. Enzymatic hydrolysis of polyester: Degradation of poly(ε-caprolactone) by Candida antarctica lipase and Fusarium solani cutinase. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020qpslcm@ikd144:183-189. 87. Dwivedi R, Kumar S, Pandey R, et al. Polycaprolactone as biomaterial for bone scaffolds: Review of literature. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020qpslcm@ikd10:381-388. 88. Yan Y, Chen H, Zhang H, et al. Vascularized 3D printed scaffolds for promoting bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 2019qpslcm@ikd190-191:97-110. 89. Coverdale BDM, Gough JE, Sampson WW, Hoyland JA. Use of lecithin to control fiber morphology in electrospun poly (ɛ-caprolactone) scaffolds for improved tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017qpslcm@ikd105:2865-2874. 90. Guo Z, Poot AA, Grijpma DW. Advanced polymer-based composites and structures for biomedical applications. European Polymer Journal. 2021qpslcm@ikd149:110388. 91. Qu H, Fu H, Han Z, Sun Y. Biomaterials for bone tissue engineering scaffolds: a review. RSC Adv. 2019qpslcm@ikd9:26252-26262. 92. Lee K, Silva EA, Mooney DJ. Growth factor delivery-based tissue engineering: general approaches and a review of recent developments. J R Soc Interface. 2011qpslcm@ikd8:153-170. 93. Wang W, Yeung KWK. Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review. Bioact Mater. 2017qpslcm@ikd2:224-247. 94. Fosca M, Rau JV, Uskoković V. Factors influencing the drug release from calcium phosphate cements. Bioact Mater. 2022qpslcm@ikd7:341-363. 95. Zha K, Yang Y, Tian G, et al. Nerve growth factor (NGF) and NGF receptors in mesenchymal stem/stromal cells: Impact on potential therapies. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2021qpslcm@ikd10:1008-1020. 96. Aloe L, Rocco ML, Bianchi P, Manni L. Nerve growth factor: from the early discoveries to the potential clinical use. J Transl Med. 2012qpslcm@ikd10:239. 97. Aloe L, Rocco ML, Balzamino BO, Micera A. Nerve Growth Factor: A Focus on Neuroscience and Therapy. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2015qpslcm@ikd13:294-303. 98. Zakrzewski W, Dobrzyński M, Szymonowicz M, Rybak Z. Stem cells: past, present, and future. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019qpslcm@ikd10:68. 99. Augello A, Tasso R, Negrini SM, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal progenitor cells inhibit lymphocyte proliferation by activation of the programmed death 1 pathway. Eur J Immunol. 2005qpslcm@ikd35:1482-1490. 100. Wang X. Stem cells in tissues, organoids, and cancers. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019qpslcm@ikd76:4043-4070. 101. Ferrari G, Cusella-De Angelis G, Coletta M, et al. Muscle regeneration by bone marrow-derived myogenic progenitors. Science. 1998qpslcm@ikd279:1528-1530. 102. Hernández R, Jiménez-Luna C, Perales-Adán J, Perazzoli G, Melguizo C, Prados J. Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells towards Neuronal Lineage: Clinical Trials in Nervous System Disorders. Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2020qpslcm@ikd28:34-44. 103. Colter DC, Class R, DiGirolamo CM, Prockop DJ. Rapid expansion of recycling stem cells in cultures of plastic-adherent cells from human bone marrow. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000qpslcm@ikd97:3213-3218. 104. Yang YK, Ogando CR, Wang See C, Chang TY, Barabino GA. Changes in phenotype and differentiation potential of human mesenchymal stem cells aging in vitro. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018qpslcm@ikd9:131. 105. Singh A, Singh A, Sen D. Mesenchymal stem cells in cardiac regeneration: a detailed progress report of the last 6 years (2010-2015). Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016qpslcm@ikd7:82. 106. Dawn B, Bolli R. Adult bone marrow-derived cells: regenerative potential, plasticity, and tissue commitment. Basic Res Cardiol. 2005qpslcm@ikd100:494-503. 107. Guo X, Bai Y, Zhang L, et al. Cardiomyocyte differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow: new regulators and its implications. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018qpslcm@ikd9:44. 108. Wagers AJ, Weissman IL. Plasticity of adult stem cells. Cell. 2004qpslcm@ikd116:639-648. 109. Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, Gurr M, Mülhaupt R. Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing. Chem Rev. 2017qpslcm@ikd117:10212-10290. 110. Paul GM, Rezaienia A, Wen P, et al. Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Recent Developments. Mo Med. 2018qpslcm@ikd115:75-81. 111. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, Nguyen KTQ, Hui D. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2018qpslcm@ikd143:172-196. 112. Chakraborty R, Anoop AG, Thakur A, Mohanta GC, Kumar P. Strategies To Modify the Surface and Bulk Properties of 3D-Printed Solid Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications. ACS Omega. 2023qpslcm@ikd8:5139-5156. 113. Penumakala PK, Santo J, Thomas A. A critical review on the fused deposition modeling of thermoplastic polymer composites. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2020qpslcm@ikd201:108336. 114. Cohn D, Salomon AH. Designing biodegradable multiblock PCL/PLA thermoplastic elastomers. Biomaterials. 2005qpslcm@ikd26:2297-2305. 115. Wang X-L, Yang K-K, Wang Y-Z. Properties of Starch Blends with Biodegradable Polymers. Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part C. 2003qpslcm@ikd43:385-409. 116. Hajiali F, Tajbakhsh S, Shojaei A. Fabrication and Properties of Polycaprolactone Composites Containing Calcium Phosphate-Based Ceramics and Bioactive Glasses in Bone Tissue Engineering: A Review. Polymer Reviews. 2018qpslcm@ikd58:164-207. 117. Park SH, Park SA, Kang YG, et al. PCL/β-TCP Composite Scaffolds Exhibit Positive Osteogenic Differentiation with Mechanical Stimulation. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017qpslcm@ikd14:349-358. 118. Hayashi K, Kishida R, Tsuchiya A, Ishikawa K. Honeycomb blocks composed of carbonate apatite, β-tricalcium phosphate, and hydroxyapatite for bone regeneration: effects of composition on biological responses. Mater Today Bio. 2019qpslcm@ikd4:100031. 119. Oh SH, Park IK, Kim JM, Lee JH. In vitro and in vivo characteristics of PCL scaffolds with pore size gradient fabricated by a centrifugation method. Biomaterials. 2007qpslcm@ikd28:1664-1671. 120. Zhang K, Fan Y, Dunne N, Li X. Effect of microporosity on scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Regen Biomater. 2018qpslcm@ikd5:115-124. 121. Abbasi N, Hamlet S, Love RM, Nguyen N-T. Porous scaffolds for bone regeneration. Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices. 2020qpslcm@ikd5:1-9. 122. Abbasi N, Ivanovski S, Gulati K, Love RM, Hamlet S. Role of offset and gradient architectures of 3-D melt electrowritten scaffold on differentiation and mineralization of osteoblasts. Biomater Res. 2020qpslcm@ikd24:2. 123. Blair HC, Larrouture QC, Li Y, et al. Osteoblast Differentiation and Bone Matrix Formation In Vivo and In Vitro. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2017qpslcm@ikd23:268-280. 124. Vimalraj S. Alkaline phosphatase: Structure, expression and its function in bone mineralization. Gene. 2020qpslcm@ikd754:144855. 125. Shin YM, Park J-S, Jeong SI, et al. Promotion of human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation on bioresorbable polycaprolactone/biphasic calcium phosphate composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering. 2014qpslcm@ikd19:341-349. 126. Turnbull G, Clarke J, Picard F, et al. 3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Bioact Mater. 2018qpslcm@ikd3:278-314. 127. Chang HC, Yang C, Feng F, Lin FH, Wang CH, Chang PC. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 loaded poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres enhance osteogenic potential of gelatin/hydroxyapatite/β-tricalcium phosphate cryogel composite for alveolar ridge augmentation. J Formos Med Assoc. 2017qpslcm@ikd116:973-981. 128. Moskow J, Ferrigno B, Mistry N, et al. Review: Bioengineering approach for the repair and regeneration of peripheral nerve. Bioact Mater. 2019qpslcm@ikd4:107-113. 129. Zhang J, Ge H, Li J, et al. Effective regeneration of rat sciatic nerve using nanofibrous scaffolds containing rat ADSCs with controlled release of rhNGF and melatonin molecules for the treatment of peripheral injury model. Regen Ther. 2023qpslcm@ikd24:180-189. 130. Song R, Murphy M, Li C, Ting K, Soo C, Zheng Z. Current development of biodegradable polymeric materials for biomedical applications. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018qpslcm@ikd12:3117-3145. 131. Samir A, Ashour FH, Hakim AAA, Bassyouni M. Recent advances in biodegradable polymers for sustainable applications. Npj Mat Degrad. 2022qpslcm@ikd6:68. 132. Antheunis H, van der Meer JC, de Geus M, Heise A, Koning CE. Autocatalytic equation describing the change in molecular weight during hydrolytic degradation of aliphatic polyesters. Biomacromolecules. 2010qpslcm@ikd11:1118-1124. 133. Dirauf M, Muljajew I, Weber C, Schubert US. Recent advances in degradable synthetic polymers for biomedical applications ‐ Beyond polyesters. Prog Polym Sci. 2022qpslcm@ikd129:101547. 134. Dumont CE, Born W. Stimulation of neurite outgrowth in a human nerve scaffold designed for peripheral nerve reconstruction. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005qpslcm@ikd73:194-202. 135. Nectow AR, Marra KG, Kaplan DL. Biomaterials for the development of peripheral nerve guidance conduits. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2012qpslcm@ikd18:40-50. 136. Christiani TR, Baroncini E, Stanzione J, Vernengo AJ. In vitro evaluation of 3D printed polycaprolactone scaffolds with angle-ply architecture for annulus fibrosus tissue engineering. Regen Biomater. 2019qpslcm@ikd6:175-184. 137. Falsafi N, Soleimani T, Fallahi H, Azadbakht M. Regulatory networks upon neurogenesis induction in PC12 cell line by small molecules. J Cell Physiol. 2019qpslcm@ikd234:18813-18824. 138. Chua P, Lim WK. Optimisation of a PC12 cell-based in vitro stroke model for screening neuroprotective agents. Sci Rep. 2021qpslcm@ikd11:8096. 139. Wigerius M, Asghar N, Melik W, Johansson M. Scribble controls NGF-mediated neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells. Eur J Cell Biol. 2013qpslcm@ikd92:213-221. 140. Bothwell MA, Schechter AL, Vaughn KM. Clonal variants of PC12 pheochromocytoma cells with altered response to nerve growth factor. Cell. 1980qpslcm@ikd21:857-866. 141. Hughes AL, Gollapudi L, Sladek TL, Neet KE. Mediation of nerve growth factor-driven cell cycle arrest in PC12 cells by p53. Simultaneous differentiation and proliferation subsequent to p53 functional inactivation. J Biol Chem. 2000qpslcm@ikd275:37829-37837. 142. Zhang J, Yan W, Chen X. p53 is required for nerve growth factor-mediated differentiation of PC12 cells via regulation of TrkA levels. Cell Death Differ. 2006qpslcm@ikd13:2118-2128. 143. Harrington AW, St Hillaire C, Zweifel LS, et al. Recruitment of actin modifiers to TrkA endosomes governs retrograde NGF signaling and survival. Cell. 2011qpslcm@ikd146:421-434. 144. Simitzi C, Stratakis E, Fotakis C, Athanassakis I, Ranella A. Microconical silicon structures influence NGF-induced PC12 cell morphology. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2015qpslcm@ikd9:424-434. 145. Lee YW, Stachowiak EK, Birkaya B, et al. NGF-induced cell differentiation and gene activation is mediated by integrative nuclear FGFR1 signaling (INFS). Plos One. 2013qpslcm@ikd8:e68931. 146. Hu R, Cao Q, Sun Z, Chen J, Zheng Q, Xiao F. A novel method of neural differentiation of PC12 cells by using Opti-MEM as a basic induction medium. Int J Mol Med. 2018qpslcm@ikd41:195-201. 147. Javkhlan Z, Hsu SH, Chen RS, Chen MH. 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffolds coated with beta tricalcium phosphate for bone regeneration. J Formos Med Assoc. 2024qpslcm@ikd123:71-77. 148. Javkhlan Z, Hsu S-H, Chen R-S, Chen M-H. Interactions of neural-like cells with 3D-printed polycaprolactone with different inner diameters for neural regeneration. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2024. 149. Muzzarelli RA, Greco F, Busilacchi A, Sollazzo V, Gigante A. Chitosan, hyaluronan and chondroitin sulfate in tissue engineering for cartilage regeneration: a review. Carbohydr Polym. 2012qpslcm@ikd89:723-739. 150. Stratton S, Shelke NB, Hoshino K, Rudraiah S, Kumbar SG. Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering. Bioact Mater. 2016qpslcm@ikd1:93-108. 151. Subramanian A, Krishnan UM, Sethuraman S. Development of biomaterial scaffold for nerve tissue engineering: Biomaterial mediated neural regeneration. J Biomed Sci. 2009qpslcm@ikd16:108. 152. Hao J, Bai B, Ci Z, et al. Large-sized bone defect repair by combining a decalcified bone matrix framework and bone regeneration units based on photo-crosslinkable osteogenic microgels. Bioact Mater. 2022qpslcm@ikd14:97-109. 153. Li Y, Chen SK, Li L, Qin L, Wang XL, Lai YX. Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials. J Orthop Translat. 2015qpslcm@ikd3:95-104. 154. Wanderman NR, Mallet C, Giambini H, et al. An Ovariectomy-Induced Rabbit Osteoporotic Model: A New Perspective. Asian Spine J. 2018qpslcm@ikd12:12-17. 155. Pearce AI, Richards RG, Milz S, Schneider E, Pearce SG. Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review. Eur Cell Mater. 2007qpslcm@ikd13:1-10. 156. Naff KA, Craig S. Chapter 6 - The Domestic Rabbit, Oryctolagus Cuniculus: Origins and History. In: Suckow MA, Stevens KA, Wilson RP, eds. The Laboratory Rabbit, Guinea Pig, Hamster, and Other Rodents. Boston: Academic Pressqpslcm@ikd 2012:157-163. 157. Copyright. In: Suckow MA, Stevens KA, Wilson RP, eds. The Laboratory Rabbit, Guinea Pig, Hamster, and Other Rodents. Boston: Academic Pressqpslcm@ikd 2012:iv. 158. Castañeda S, Largo R, Calvo E, et al. Bone mineral measurements of subchondral and trabecular bone in healthy and osteoporotic rabbits. Skeletal Radiol. 2006qpslcm@ikd35:34-41. 159. Wang X, Mabrey JD, Agrawal CM. An interspecies comparison of bone fracture properties. Biomed Mater Eng. 1998qpslcm@ikd8:1-9. 160. Duranova H, Kovacova V, Babosova R, et al. Sex-related variations in bone microstructure of rabbits intramuscularly exposed to patulin. Acta Vet Scand. 2015qpslcm@ikd57:50. 161. Guo J, Meng Z, Chen G, et al. Restoration of critical-size defects in the rabbit mandible using porous nanohydroxyapatite-polyamide scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A. 2012qpslcm@ikd18:1239-1252. 162. Campillo VE, Langonnet S, Pierrefeu A, Chaux-Bodard AG. Anatomic and histological study of the rabbit mandible as an experimental model for wound healing and surgical therapies. Lab Anim. 2014qpslcm@ikd48:273-277. 163. Rottgers SA, Cray JJ, Jr., Smith DM, Mooney MP, Losee JE, Cooper GM. Bone morphogenetic protein 2–mediated mandible reconstruction successfully heals bony defects but inhibits concurrent inferior alveolar nerve grafting: a rabbit experimental model. J Craniofac Surg. 2014qpslcm@ikd25:2241-2245. 164. De Lucca L, da Costa Marques M, Weinfeld I. Guided bone regeneration with polypropylene barrier in rabbit''s calvaria: A preliminary experimental study. Heliyon. 2018qpslcm@ikd4:e00651. 165. Yuan A, Rao MV, Veeranna, Nixon RA. Neurofilaments at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2012qpslcm@ikd125:3257-3263. 166. Burton PR, Wentz MA. Neurofilaments are prominent in bullfrog olfactory axons but are rarely seen in those of the tiger salamander, Ambystoma tigrinum. J Comp Neurol. 1992qpslcm@ikd317:396-406. 167. Sánchez I, Hassinger L, Sihag RK, Cleveland DW, Mohan P, Nixon RA. Local control of neurofilament accumulation during radial growth of myelinating axons in vivo. Selective role of site-specific phosphorylation. J Cell Biol. 2000qpslcm@ikd151:1013-1024. 168. Schwartz ML, Shneidman PS, Bruce J, Schlaepfer WW. Axonal dependency of the postnatal upregulation in neurofilament expression. J Neurosci Res. 1990qpslcm@ikd27:193-201. 169. Levi-Montalcini R. Effects of mouse tumor transplantation on the nervous system. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1952qpslcm@ikd55:330-344. 170. Levi-Montalcini R, Hamburger V. Selective growth stimulating effects of mouse sarcoma on the sensory and sympathetic nervous system of the chick embryo. J Exp Zool. 1951qpslcm@ikd116:321-361. 171. Miao Z, Lu Z, Luo S, et al. Murine and Chinese cobra venom‑derived nerve growth factor stimulate chondrogenic differentiation of BMSCs in vitro: A comparative study. Mol Med Rep. 2018qpslcm@ikd18:3341-3349. 172. Zheng MG, Sui WY, He ZD, et al. TrkA regulates the regenerative capacity of bone marrow stromal stem cells in nerve grafts. Neural Regen Res. 2019qpslcm@ikd14:1765-1771. 173. Tomellini E, Lagadec C, Polakowska R, Le Bourhis X. Role of p75 neurotrophin receptor in stem cell biology: more than just a marker. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014qpslcm@ikd71:2467-2481. 174. Hartman DS, McCormack M, Schubenel R, Hertel C. Multiple trkA proteins in PC12 cells bind NGF with a slow association rate. J Biol Chem. 1992qpslcm@ikd267:24516-24522. 175. Fiore M, Chaldakov GN, Aloe L. Nerve growth factor as a signaling molecule for nerve cells and also for the neuroendocrine-immune systems. Rev Neurosci. 2009qpslcm@ikd20:133-145. 176. Schor NF. The p75 neurotrophin receptor in human development and disease. Prog Neurobiol. 2005qpslcm@ikd77:201-214. 177. Zheng M, Duan J, He Z, et al. Transplantation of bone marrow stromal stem cells overexpressing tropomyosin receptor kinase A for peripheral nerve repair. Cytotherapy. 2017qpslcm@ikd19:916-926. 178. Shanab AY, Mysona BA, Matragoon S, El-Remessy AB. Silencing p75(NTR) prevents proNGF-induced endothelial cell death and development of acellular capillaries in rat retina. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2015qpslcm@ikd2:15013. 179. Gharibi B, Ghuman MS, Hughes FJ. Akt- and Erk-mediated regulation of proliferation and differentiation during PDGFRβ-induced MSC self-renewal. J Cell Mol Med. 2012qpslcm@ikd16:2789-2801. 180. Krewson CE, Saltzman WM. Transport and elimination of recombinant human NGF during long-term delivery to the brain. Brain Res. 1996qpslcm@ikd727:169-181. 181. Burian E, Probst F, Palla B, et al. Effect of hypoxia on the proliferation of porcine bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in 2- and 3-dimensional culture. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017qpslcm@ikd45:414-419. 182. Sensebé L, Krampera M, Schrezenmeier H, Bourin P, Giordano R. Mesenchymal stem cells for clinical application. Vox Sang. 2010qpslcm@ikd98:93-107. 183. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999qpslcm@ikd284:143-147. 184. Squillaro T, Peluso G, Galderisi U. Clinical Trials With Mesenchymal Stem Cells: An Update. Cell Transplant. 2016qpslcm@ikd25:829-848. 185. Caplan AI. MSCs: The Sentinel and Safe-Guards of Injury. J Cell Physiol. 2016qpslcm@ikd231:1413-1416. 186. Parekkadan B, Milwid JM. Mesenchymal stem cells as therapeutics. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2010qpslcm@ikd12:87-117. 187. Oja S, Komulainen P, Penttilä A, Nystedt J, Korhonen M. Automated image analysis detects aging in clinical-grade mesenchymal stromal cell cultures. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018qpslcm@ikd9:6. 188. Severino V, Alessio N, Farina A, et al. Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins 4 and 7 released by senescent cells promote premature senescence in mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Death Dis. 2013qpslcm@ikd4:e911. 189. Luo X, Fu Y, Loza AJ, et al. Stromal-Initiated Changes in the Bone Promote Metastatic Niche Development. Cell Rep. 2016qpslcm@ikd14:82-92. 190. Kaneshiro S, Ebina K, Shi K, et al. IL-6 negatively regulates osteoblast differentiation through the SHP2/MEK2 and SHP2/Akt2 pathways in vitro. J Bone Miner Metab. 2014qpslcm@ikd32:378-392. 191. Zhu S, He H, Gao C, et al. Ovariectomy-induced bone loss in TNFα and IL6 gene knockout mice is regulated by different mechanisms. J Mol Endocrinol. 2018qpslcm@ikd60:185-198. 192. Zhou S, Greenberger JS, Epperly MW, et al. Age-related intrinsic changes in human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and their differentiation to osteoblasts. Aging Cell. 2008qpslcm@ikd7:335-343. 193. Li S, Liao X, He Y, et al. Exosomes derived from NGF-overexpressing bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell sheet promote spinal cord injury repair in a mouse model. Neurochem Int. 2022qpslcm@ikd157:105339. 194. Probst FA, Fliefel R, Burian E, et al. Bone regeneration of minipig mandibular defect by adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells seeded tri-calcium phosphate- poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) scaffolds. Sci Rep. 2020qpslcm@ikd10:2062. 195. Croker SL, Reed W, Donlon D. Comparative cortical bone thickness between the long bones of humans and five common non-human mammal taxa. Forensic Sci Int. 2016qpslcm@ikd260:104.e101-104.e117. 196. Walters EM, Prather RS. Advancing swine models for human health and diseases. Mo Med. 2013qpslcm@ikd110:212-215. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91661 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: There are still not investigated two different tissue regenerations at the same time with different scaffolds. Mandibular bone and mandibular nerve branch, such as inferior alveolar nerve tissue regeneration, are important issues and still face challenges caused by injuries such as extraction of impacted third molars, dental implants, and also cancer. Recent reports demonstrated that FDA-approved polycaprolactone scaffolds are effective for tissue regeneration. We hypothesized that bone marrow stem cell-loaded and modified 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffolds could regenerate both mandibular bone and inferior alveolar nerves at the same time.
The purposes of this study were as follows: 1) to investigate the mesh-structured 3D-printed PCL scaffolds coated with beta-tricalcium phosphate for bone tissue engineering in vitro for osteoblast-like cell regeneration. 2) to investigate the 3D-printed and poly-D-lysine-coated PCL scaffolds with a half-tubular array for neuron-like cell regeneration in vitro. 3) to investigate the mesh-structured 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffolds coated with beta-tricalcium phosphate and tube 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffolds with inner diameter half tubular array coated with chitosan and loaded with rabbit bone marrow stem cells for both mandibular bone and mandibular nerve regeneration in rabbits at the same time. 4) to investigate the mesh-structured 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffolds coated with beta-tricalcium phosphate and tube 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffolds coated with chitosan and seeded with pig bone marrow stem cells for both mandibular bone and inferior alveolar nerve regeneration in pigs at the same time. Methods: In vitro assays of viability and differentiation were carried out on a 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffold of PC12 and MG-63 cells. The MTT assay is used for assessing cell viability. ALP is a mineralization assay used for MG-63 cell differentiation. Neuronal differentiation induced by nerve growth factor and expression of PC12 cell neuronal differentiation markers such as β3-tubulin and glial fibrillary acidic protein were carried out by immunofluorescence. In addition, experiments were extended to continue with in vivo experiments. Bone marrow stem cells were isolated from both rabbits and pigs, and seeded in the 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffold for transplantation into the bones of the left mandible ramus side and mandibular nerve of the rabbit, the bone of the left mandible body side, and the inferior alveolar nerve of the pig, respectively. Created defects only in the bone of the mandibular ramus side of rabbits (right mandible) and the right mandible of the pigs were transplanted with acellular both bone and neural scaffolds as the control group. Micro-CT was performed for observation of bone-critical defect reconstruction. Cone beam computerized tomography irradiation was used for dynamic assessment. Four and eight weeks post-operation, animals were euthanized, and the mandibles of animals were sectioned and fixed for histological observation with Stevenel‘s blue, alizarin red , hematoxylin, and eosin staining and clinical findings. A confocal microscope was used to evaluate bone mineralization. Immunofluorescence was used for neuronal detection in the cellular 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffold transplantation area. Both bone and neuronal polycaprolactone scaffolds from rabbit and pig experiments were fabricated with a fused deposition modeling 3D-printer. Results: The result shows that 3D-printed mesh polycaprolactone scaffolds coated with beta-tricalcium phosphate for bone regeneration and poly-D-lysine coated polycaprolactone scaffold with a 200 μm inner diameter of a half tubular array for neural regeneration were effective for both osteoblast like MG-63 and neuron like PC12 cells adhesion, growth and differentiation in vitro. Rabbit and pig bone marrow stem cell- loaded mesh-structured 3D-printed polycaprolactone dip coated with beta-tricalcium phosphate and tube structured 3D-printed and chitosan coated polycaprolactone scaffold with a 200 μm inner diameter of half tubular array implantation and reconstruction of the bone and nerve defects, stage of the bone mineralization, remodeling, and clinical finding results in the experimental group with cellular scaffolds were significantly higher resulted than the control group with a cellular scaffold of pig and without scaffolds of rabbit. Neuronal regeneration finding is not clear, however, rabbit bone marrow stem cell loaded and chitosan coated polycaprolactone scaffold areas have found some axons and determined by neurofilament-medium staining. Besides, we could not find neuronal regeneration results in pig animal experiments. Conclusion: This study is the first report demonstrating that 3D-printed mesh polycaprolactone scaffold dip coated with beta-tricalcium phosphate, poly-D-lysine coated polycaprolactone scaffolds with different inner diameters of half tubular arrays, and chitosan coated, different-sized tube polycaprolactone scaffold with a 200 μm inner diameter of half tubular array was capable of both bone and neuronal regeneration in vitro and in vivo. Rabbit bone marrow stem cell-loaded mesh polycaprolactone scaffolds were dip-coated with beta-tricalcium phosphate, and chitosan coated tube polycaprolactone scaffolds with a 200 μm inner diameter of a half tubular array was regenerated with both rabbit mandibular bone and mandibular nerve, respectively. This study was also the first report for in vivo observation of both bone (mesh PCL coated with tricalcium phosphate) and nerve (tube PCL with an inner diameter of a half tubular array coated with chitosan) scaffolds assembled with each other, such as “LEGO TOY” to regenerate both mandibular bone and mandibular and inferior alveolar nerve tissue at the same time in small and large experimental animals. | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background: There are still not investigated two different tissue regenerations at the same time with different scaffolds. Mandibular bone and mandibular nerve branch, such as inferior alveolar nerve tissue regeneration, are important issues and still face challenges caused by injuries such as extraction of impacted third molars, dental implants, and also cancer. Recent reports demonstrated that FDA-approved polycaprolactone scaffolds are effective for tissue regeneration. We hypothesized that bone marrow stem cell-loaded and modified 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffolds could regenerate both mandibular bone and inferior alveolar nerves at the same time.
The purposes of this study were as follows: 1) to investigate the mesh-structured 3D-printed PCL scaffolds coated with beta-tricalcium phosphate for bone tissue engineering in vitro for osteoblast-like cell regeneration. 2) to investigate the 3D-printed and poly-D-lysine-coated PCL scaffolds with a half-tubular array for neuron-like cell regeneration in vitro. 3) to investigate the mesh-structured 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffolds coated with beta-tricalcium phosphate and tube 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffolds with inner diameter half tubular array coated with chitosan and loaded with rabbit bone marrow stem cells for both mandibular bone and mandibular nerve regeneration in rabbits at the same time. 4) to investigate the mesh-structured 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffolds coated with beta-tricalcium phosphate and tube 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffolds coated with chitosan and seeded with pig bone marrow stem cells for both mandibular bone and inferior alveolar nerve regeneration in pigs at the same time. Methods: In vitro assays of viability and differentiation were carried out on a 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffold of PC12 and MG-63 cells. The MTT assay is used for assessing cell viability. ALP is a mineralization assay used for MG-63 cell differentiation. Neuronal differentiation induced by nerve growth factor and expression of PC12 cell neuronal differentiation markers such as β3-tubulin and glial fibrillary acidic protein were carried out by immunofluorescence. In addition, experiments were extended to continue with in vivo experiments. Bone marrow stem cells were isolated from both rabbits and pigs, and seeded in the 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffold for transplantation into the bones of the left mandible ramus side and mandibular nerve of the rabbit, the bone of the left mandible body side, and the inferior alveolar nerve of the pig, respectively. Created defects only in the bone of the mandibular ramus side of rabbits (right mandible) and the right mandible of the pigs were transplanted with acellular both bone and neural scaffolds as the control group. Micro-CT was performed for observation of bone-critical defect reconstruction. Cone beam computerized tomography irradiation was used for dynamic assessment. Four and eight weeks post-operation, animals were euthanized, and the mandibles of animals were sectioned and fixed for histological observation with Stevenel‘s blue, alizarin red , hematoxylin, and eosin staining and clinical findings. A confocal microscope was used to evaluate bone mineralization. Immunofluorescence was used for neuronal detection in the cellular 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffold transplantation area. Both bone and neuronal polycaprolactone scaffolds from rabbit and pig experiments were fabricated with a fused deposition modeling 3D-printer. Results: The result shows that 3D-printed mesh polycaprolactone scaffolds coated with beta-tricalcium phosphate for bone regeneration and poly-D-lysine coated polycaprolactone scaffold with a 200 μm inner diameter of a half tubular array for neural regeneration were effective for both osteoblast like MG-63 and neuron like PC12 cells adhesion, growth and differentiation in vitro. Rabbit and pig bone marrow stem cell- loaded mesh-structured 3D-printed polycaprolactone dip coated with beta-tricalcium phosphate and tube structured 3D-printed and chitosan coated polycaprolactone scaffold with a 200 μm inner diameter of half tubular array implantation and reconstruction of the bone and nerve defects, stage of the bone mineralization, remodeling, and clinical finding results in the experimental group with cellular scaffolds were significantly higher resulted than the control group with a cellular scaffold of pig and without scaffolds of rabbit. Neuronal regeneration finding is not clear, however, rabbit bone marrow stem cell loaded and chitosan coated polycaprolactone scaffold areas have found some axons and determined by neurofilament-medium staining. Besides, we could not find neuronal regeneration results in pig animal experiments. Conclusion: This study is the first report demonstrating that 3D-printed mesh polycaprolactone scaffold dip coated with beta-tricalcium phosphate, poly-D-lysine coated polycaprolactone scaffolds with different inner diameters of half tubular arrays, and chitosan coated, different-sized tube polycaprolactone scaffold with a 200 μm inner diameter of half tubular array was capable of both bone and neuronal regeneration in vitro and in vivo. Rabbit bone marrow stem cell-loaded mesh polycaprolactone scaffolds were dip-coated with beta-tricalcium phosphate, and chitosan coated tube polycaprolactone scaffolds with a 200 μm inner diameter of a half tubular array was regenerated with both rabbit mandibular bone and mandibular nerve, respectively. This study was also the first report for in vivo observation of both bone (mesh PCL coated with tricalcium phosphate) and nerve (tube PCL with an inner diameter of a half tubular array coated with chitosan) scaffolds assembled with each other, such as “LEGO TOY” to regenerate both mandibular bone and mandibular and inferior alveolar nerve tissue at the same time in small and large experimental animals. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-02-20T16:26:12Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-02-20T16:26:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | List of contents
Abstract II List of Contents VI List of Figure XII Abbreviations XX Chapter 1. Background 1 1.1 Motivations and Significance of the Research 1 1.2 Hypothesis 2 1.3 Purposes Specific Aims 2 Chapter 2. Literature Review 4 2.1 Biology of bone and nerve 4 2.1.1 Bone cells 6 2.1.2 Osteoblast cells 6 2.1.3 Osteocyte cells 9 2.1.4 Osteoclasts cells 10 2.1.5 Regulation of bone cell formation 12 2.1.6 Cells for the nervous system 14 2.1.7 Schwann cells in axonal regeneration 16 2.2 Mandibular bone 17 2.3 Development of mandibular bone and infra-alveolar nerve 18 2.4 Treatment nowadays 19 2.5 New Therapy Approaching 20 2.6 Tissue engineering 21 2.6.1 Basic principle of scaffolds 21 2.6.1.1 History of biomaterial 23 2.6.1.2 Bioactive inorganic materials 24 2.6.1.3 Polymers 25 2.6.1.4 Composite materials 30 2.6.1.5 Metal 31 2.6.2 Bioactive molecules 31 2.6.3 Stem cells 33 2.6.3.1 Bone marrow stem cell 34 2.6.3.2 Stem cell trans-differentiation 34 2.7 3D-printing technology 35 2.7.1 Main methods to fabricate 3D scaffolds 36 2.7.2 Fused Deposition Modelling 37 2.8 Flowchart of Experimental design 37 Chapter 3. Materials and Methods of Bone Regeneration in Vitro 40 3.1 PCL scaffold fabrication for bone regeneration 40 3.2 Scanning-electron microscope observation 41 3.3 Cell culture 41 3.4 MTT assay 41 3.5 DAPI staining 42 3.6 ALP activity assay 42 3.7 Mineralization assay 43 3.8 Statistical analysis 43 Chapter 4. Materials and Methods of Peripheral Neural Regeneration in vitro 45 4.1 Fabrication of 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffolds with different inner diameters of half tubular array 45 4.2 Mechanical testing 45 4.3 Cell culture 46 4.4 Surface coating 46 4.5 Cell adhesion and growth morphology analysis 47 4.6 Cell viability assay 47 4.7 Neural differentiation and immunofluorescence assay 48 4.8 Statistical analysis 49 Chapter 5. Materials and Methods of Both Bone and Neural Regeneration in Vivo, Rabbit Model 50 5.1 Fabrication of 3D-printed PCL scaffolds 50 5.2 Rabbit bone marrow stem cell isolation and culture 51 5.3 Surgery of scaffold implantation 52 5.4 Cone beam CT and Micro- CT analysis 53 5.5 Stevenel’s blue and alizarin red staining 54 5.6 Hematoxylin and eosin staining 54 5.7 Immunofluorescence staining 54 5.8 Statistical analysis 55 Chapter 6. Materials and Methods of Bone Regeneration in Vivo Pig Model 56 6.1 Fabrication of 3D-printed PCL scaffolds 56 6.2 Pig bone marrow stem cell isolation and cell culture 57 6.3 Surgery of scaffold implantation 57 6.4 Cone beam-CT and micro-CT 59 6.5 Confocal microscope analysis 59 6.6 Statistical analysis 60 Chapter 7. Results of Bone Regeneration in Vitro 61 7.1 SEM observation of fabricated scaffolds 61 7.2 Cell viability of MG-63 61 7.3 DAPI staining 61 7.4 ALP activity 62 7.5 Mineralization assay 62 Chapter 8. Results of Neural Regeneration in Vitro 63 8.1 Mechanical properties 63 8.1.1 Tensile strength 63 8.1.2 Elongation 63 8.1.3 Young’s modulus 63 8.2 Cell adhesion and growth morphology analysis 64 8.3 Cell viability 64 8.4 Cell differentiation and immunofluorescence staining 64 Chapter 9. Results of Both Bone and Neural Tissue Regeneration, Rabbit Model 67 9.1 Cone beam CT and Micro-CT 67 9.2 Clinical finding 67 9.3 Stevenel’s blue and alizarin red staining 68 9.4 Hematoxylin and eosin staining 68 9.5 Immunofluorescence staining 69 Chapter 10. Results of Both Bone and Neural Tissue Regeneration, Pig Model 70 10.1 Cone beam CT and Micro-CT 70 10.2 Clinical finding 70 10.3 Confocal microscope analysis 71 Chapter 11. Discussion of Bone Regeneration in Vitro 72 Chapter 12. Discussion of Neural Tissue Regeneration in Vitro 76 Chapter 13. Discussion of Both Bone and Neural Tissue Regeneration, Rabbit model 81 Chapter 14. Discussion of Both Bone and Neural Tissue Regeneration, Pig model 88 Chapter 15. Conclusions 93 Chapter 16. Future Work 96 References 97 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.title | Application of 3D-printed Polycaprolactone Scaffolds for both Bone and Neural Tissue Regeneration | zh_TW |
dc.title | Application of 3D-printed Polycaprolactone Scaffolds for both Bone and Neural Tissue Regeneration | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-1 | - |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 章浩宏;王志龍;李亦宸;周涵怡;陳羿貞 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Hao-Hueng Chang;Zhi-Long Wang;Yi-Chen Li;Han-Yi Zhou;Yi-Zhen Chen | en |
dc.subject.keyword | bone tissue engineering,beta-tricalcium phosphate,MG-63 cells,mesh structured polycaprolactone scaffold,neural regeneration,half tubular polycaprolactone scaffold,poly-D-lysine,PC12,chitosan,tube polycaprolactone scaffold,rabbit mandibular bone regeneration,rabbit mandibular nerve regeneration,pig mandibular bone regeneration,pig inferior alveolar nerve regeneration,three-dimensional printing,bone marrow stem cell,nerve growth factor,fused deposition modeling technique, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | bone tissue engineering,beta-tricalcium phosphate,MG-63 cells,mesh structured polycaprolactone scaffold,neural regeneration,half tubular polycaprolactone scaffold,poly-D-lysine,PC12,chitosan,tube polycaprolactone scaffold,rabbit mandibular bone regeneration,rabbit mandibular nerve regeneration,pig mandibular bone regeneration,pig inferior alveolar nerve regeneration,three-dimensional printing,bone marrow stem cell,nerve growth factor,fused deposition modeling technique, | en |
dc.relation.page | 163 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202400680 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2024-02-17 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 臨床牙醫學研究所 | - |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2029-02-15 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 臨床牙醫學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.46 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。